The present disclosure relates generally to signal communication.
CDR circuits (or systems) are generally used to sample an incoming data signal, extract the clock from the incoming data signal, and retime the sampled data. A phase-locked loop (PLL)-based CDR circuit is a conventional type of CDR circuit. By way of example, in a conventional PLL based CDR, a phase detector compares the phase between input data bits from a serial input data stream and a clock signal from a voltage-controlled oscillator (VCO). In response to the phase difference between the input data and the clock, the phase detector generates signals UP and DN. A charge pump drives a current to or from a loop filter according to the UP and DN signals. The loop filter generates a control voltage VCTRL for the VCO based on the UP and DN signals. The loop acts as a feedback control system that tracks the phase of input data stream with the phase of the clock that the loop generates. The dynamics of the loop are generally determined by the open loop gain and the location of open loop zeroes and poles (predominantly in the loop filter).
When multiple phases of a periodic signal are needed, such as with a clock signal used for clock and data recovery (CDR), a challenge is to accurately generate these multiple phases. Conventionally, delay-locked loops (DLL) and phase interpolators (PI) have been used to generate the needed phases in conjunction with conventional voltage-controlled oscillators. One problem with these devices is the accuracy obtained when generating phases having intermediate degree increments.
Various applications such as DLLs, 90 degree shifters, phase interpolators, and generators of adjustable clock phases require a high-speed phase detector whose output is zero for a 90 degree or other non-zero phase offset between inputs. The speed of conventional phase detectors, such as a phase and frequency detector (PFD) or an Alexander Detector, are limited by the speed of the flip-flops which are their integral parts. In addition, these conventional phase detectors are designed to output zero for nominal zero input phase offset, and are typically asymmetric in that the output of such phase detectors has a built-in phase offset between its inputs. The phase offset output from the phase detector typically cannot be compensated.
Particular embodiments relate to a clock and data recovery (CDR) circuit. Particular embodiments relate to a CDR circuit that includes a phase interpolator integrated with a phase detector. Particular embodiments relate to the generation of an 8-phase clock signal from a 4-phase clock signal for use as a sampling clock signal in a 40 Gb/s quarter-rate CDR circuit. Particular embodiments relate to a 10 GHz phase interpolator for a 40 Gb/s CDR circuit. Particular embodiments relate to a phase detector that is symmetric with respect to the inputs to the phase detector. Particular embodiments relate to a high-speed phase detector for periodic input signals (e.g., clock signals). Particular embodiments relate to a phase detector having an output that is zero for a 90° or other non-zero phase offset between the inputs to the phase detector. Particular embodiments further relate to the use of parallel cross-coupled Gilbert cells for use in a phase detector. In particular embodiments, the signals described below are differential signals where appropriate. In particular embodiments, various signals described below are periodic signals, where appropriate.
In particular embodiments, to relax the bandwidth requirements in PD 102 and VCO 108, the operating frequency of the CDR may be 1/n of the data rate of Din, which requires that PD 102 receive multiple clock phases. By way of example, half-rate CDR architectures require four clock phases (e.g., 0°, 90° (π/2), 180° (π), and 270° (3π/2)) and quarter-rate CDR architectures require eight clock phases (e.g., 0°, 45°, 90°, 135°, 180°, 225°, 270°, and 315°). In general, 1/n-rate CDR architectures require m=2×n clock phases. Furthermore, other CDR architectures may require more than two samples per clock cycle. By way of example, if j samples per clock cycle are required, then the corresponding 1/n-rate CDR would require m=j×n clock phases. For purposes of simplified illustration of example embodiments, the following disclosure focuses on embodiments utilizing conventional CDRs with one edge and one center sample per cycle (m=2×n).
Generally, one requirement of a CDR is the capability to adjust the decision phase (i.e., the center sample time relative to the edge sample). In particular embodiments, this phase adjustment functionality may be implemented with the use of a phase interpolator (PI) block 210 connected between PD 102 and VCO 108, as illustrated in
High data rate CDRs are often implemented as quarter-rate architectures with inductor-capacitor (LC)-based VCOs. By way of example, high data rates may refer to data rates equal or greater than 10 Gb/s, equal or greater than 20 Gb/s, or equal or greater than 40 Gb/s. Quarter-rate CDRs generally require eight or more clock phases, the generation and delivery of which present numerous difficulties using LC-based VCOs, partly due to the number of inductors required. LC-based VCOs can relatively easily produce two or four clock phases, but become difficult to deal with when more phases (e.g., 8, 12 or more) are required.
In particular embodiments, the generation of the extra intermediate phases needed for, by way of example, quarter-rate CDRs, is combined with the phase adjustment requirement using a single PI block 410 as illustrated in
In particular embodiments, PI 612 takes as input the 4-phase clock signal including clock signals φ0, φ90, φ180, and φ270, having phases of approximately 0°, 90°, 180°, and 270°, respectively, from VCO 508. Using these signals, PI 612 outputs an 8-phase clock signal that includes clock signals Φ0, Φ90, Φ180, and Φ270, having phases of approximately 0°, 90°, 180°, and 270°, respectively, along with four additional intermediately-phased clock signals Φ45, Φ135, Φ225, and Φ315, having phases of approximately 45°, 135°, 225°, and 315°, respectively. As described above, PD 614 provides feedback to PI 612 in the form of error (or control) signals that are used by PI 612 to adjust the 8-phase clock signal output. By way of example, a first PI 612 may use the input signals Φ0 and Φ90 to generate the output signal Φ45, while other PIs 612 in parallel with the first PI 612 generate the other intermediately-phase clock signals, respectively.
In particular embodiments, PD 802 further includes an adder 824 that receives the first and second MC output signals and adds the first and second MC output signals to produce a summed output signal. In particular embodiments, PD 802 additionally includes an integrator 826 that filters the summed output signal to produce an integrated (e.g., DC) output signal that represents the PD output signal Vout output over the PD output. In the embodiment illustrated in
In particular embodiments, first mixer cell 820 is a multiplying mixer cell and second mixer cell 822 is a multiplying mixer cell. In more particular embodiments, first mixer cell 820 is a Gilbert cell and second mixer cell 822 is a Gilbert cell. As those of skill in the art may appreciate, a Gilbert cell is an electronic multiplying mixer. By way of reference, the output current of a Gilbert cell is an accurate multiplication of the (differential) base currents of both inputs.
In even more particular embodiments, first mixer cell 820 includes a first Gilbert cell 830 and a second Gilbert cell 832 cross-coupled in parallel, while second mixer cell 822 includes a third Gilbert cell 834 and a fourth Gilbert cell 836 cross-coupled in parallel, as illustrated in
In this way, the first MC output signal output from first mixer cell 820 is symmetric with respect to the inputs Vin1 and Vin2 and the second MC output signal output from second mixer cell 822 is symmetric with respect to the inputs Vin2 and Vin3. More specifically, the delay between the first input of any Gilbert cell and the output of the Gilbert cell is generally different than the delay between the second input of the Gilbert cell and the output of the Gilbert cell. This results in a static phase offset in the output signal output from the Gilbert cell. However, by cross-coupling two Gilbert cells in parallel as illustrated in each of the mixer cells 820 and 822 of
The output, Vout, of PD 802 represents an error signal that is proportional to the difference in phase between the phase of Vin3 and the average of the phases of Vin1 and Vin2. By way of example, assume Vin1 represents Φ0, Vin2 represents Φ90, and Vin3 represents Φ45. In this example, Vout represent an error signal that is proportional to the difference between the phase of Φ45, which is approximately 45° (as noted above, VCOs have difficulty generating intermediately-phased signals such as 45°, and as such the phase of Φ45 is only roughly equal to 45°), and the average of the phases of Φ0 and Φ90, which is approximately 45° since the phase of Φ0 and Φ90 are approximately 0° and 90°, respectively. The error signal, Vout, is then fed to PI 612, which then adjusts the phase of Φ45 to eliminate the phase difference (which would then result in a zero-valued error signal), which results in a Φ45 having a phase truer to 45°. In this manner, PD 614 provides a feedback loop to PI 612 to compensate for the inaccuracy of PI 612.
In particular embodiments, PD 614 also utilizes this circuit and process to adjust or verify the other intermediately-phased signals Φ135, Φ225, and Φ315 generated by PIs 612. In particular embodiments, PD 614 generates four error signals Vout in parallel to adjust or verify signals Φ45, Φ135, Φ225, and Φ315. By way of example, to adjust or verify Φ135, PD 614 may receive Φ90 as Vin1, Φ135 as Vin2, and Φ180 as Vin3. To adjust or verify Φ225, PD 614 may receive Φ180 as Vin1, Φ225 as Vin2, and Φ270 as Vin3. To adjust or verify Φ315, PD 614 may receive Φ270 as Vin1, Φ315 as Vin2 and Φ0 as Vin3. Note that since the clock signals are differential signals, the signals may be inverted to obtain signals having 180° phase offsets.
It should also be appreciated that this circuit and method may be used to adjust any of the signals Φ0, Φ45, Φ90, Φ135, Φ180, Φ225, Φ270, and Φ315, as well as any other signal have any desired intermediate phase in between any of these signals. By way of example, PD 614 may receive Φ0 as Vin1, an additional signal δ having phase in the range between Φ0 and Φ45 as Vin2, and Φ45 as Vin3. After a number of iterations, δ will have a phase of approximately 22.5°. Additionally, by adding deliberate offsets in the feedback path an arbitrary phase (other than, for example, 45° and 135°) may be created. By way of example, the phases offset may either be introduced as a weighted difference of the tail currents of the multipliers (Gilbert cells) as illustrated in
Referring back to
The present disclosure encompasses all changes, substitutions, variations, alterations, and modifications to the example embodiments herein that a person having ordinary skill in the art would comprehend. Similarly, where appropriate, the appended claims encompass all changes, substitutions, variations, alterations, and modifications to the example embodiments herein that a person having ordinary skill in the art would comprehend.
This application claims the benefit, under 35 U.S.C. §119(e), of U.S. Provisional Patent Application No. 61/084,483, entitled Clock and Data Recovery System Using Phase Interpolation, filed 29 Jul. 2008.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
4920278 | Nawata | Apr 1990 | A |
5039889 | Janta | Aug 1991 | A |
5343097 | Takeuchi | Aug 1994 | A |
6381291 | Yom | Apr 2002 | B1 |
6426662 | Arcus | Jul 2002 | B1 |
6496077 | Ahn | Dec 2002 | B2 |
7012474 | Yen | Mar 2006 | B2 |
7286625 | Lee et al. | Oct 2007 | B2 |
7420870 | Park et al. | Sep 2008 | B2 |
7444085 | Ikeuchi | Oct 2008 | B2 |
7446616 | Lee | Nov 2008 | B2 |
7489743 | Koh et al. | Feb 2009 | B2 |
7532038 | Lin | May 2009 | B2 |
7535271 | Kizer | May 2009 | B2 |
7679453 | Min | Mar 2010 | B2 |
7737791 | Sareen et al. | Jun 2010 | B2 |
7881419 | Shin | Feb 2011 | B2 |
7924071 | Hiraku | Apr 2011 | B2 |
8058914 | Kristensson | Nov 2011 | B2 |
8138798 | Nedovic | Mar 2012 | B2 |
20020131539 | Li et al. | Sep 2002 | A1 |
20030189464 | Drapkin et al. | Oct 2003 | A1 |
20030198105 | Yamaguchi | Oct 2003 | A1 |
20030198311 | Song et al. | Oct 2003 | A1 |
20040022339 | Nakao | Feb 2004 | A1 |
20040210790 | Moon et al. | Oct 2004 | A1 |
20060208811 | Lee | Sep 2006 | A1 |
20060255866 | Hirai | Nov 2006 | A1 |
20070006053 | Otto | Jan 2007 | A1 |
20070041486 | Shin | Feb 2007 | A1 |
20070047972 | Ikeuchi | Mar 2007 | A1 |
20080100364 | Hiraku | May 2008 | A1 |
20080111634 | Min | May 2008 | A1 |
20080192873 | Tamura | Aug 2008 | A1 |
20080260071 | Sidiropoulos et al. | Oct 2008 | A1 |
20080309319 | Hermann | Dec 2008 | A1 |
20090009228 | Jang | Jan 2009 | A1 |
20090066423 | Sareen et al. | Mar 2009 | A1 |
20090125652 | Huff | May 2009 | A1 |
20090149149 | Rujis | Jun 2009 | A1 |
20090237128 | Qiao | Sep 2009 | A1 |
20100085086 | Nedovic | Apr 2010 | A1 |
20100086075 | Parikh | Apr 2010 | A1 |
20100090723 | Nedovic | Apr 2010 | A1 |
20100090733 | Kristensson | Apr 2010 | A1 |
20100091925 | Nedovic | Apr 2010 | A1 |
20100104057 | Nedovic | Apr 2010 | A1 |
20100119024 | Shumarayev et al. | May 2010 | A1 |
20100241918 | Nedovic | Sep 2010 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
2008018034 | Feb 2008 | WO |
Entry |
---|
SerDes Framer Interface Level 5 Phase 2 (SFI-5.2): Implementation Agreement for 40Gb/s Interface for Physical Layer Devices, IA# OIF-SFI5-02.0, Oct. 2, 2006. |
Hanumolu, P. K. et al., “A Wide-Tracking Range Clock and Data Recovery Circuit”, IEEE JSSC, 43:2, Feb. 2008. |
Lee, J. et al., “A 40-Gb/s Clock and Data Recovery Circuit in O.18-/-tm CMOS Technology”, IEEE Journal of Solid-State Circuits, 38:12, Dec. 2003. |
Nedovic, N. et al., “A 40-44Gb/s 3x Oversampling CMOS CDR /1: 16 DEMUX”, ISSCC Digest of Technical Papers, 2007. |
Staszewski, R. B. et al, “All-Digital TX Frequency Synthesizer and Discrete-Time Receiver for Bluetooth Radio in 130-nm CMOS”, IEEE JSSC, 39:12, Dec. 2004. |
Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 12/510,211, Aug. 23, 2010. |
Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 12/511,340, Sep. 28, 2010. |
Dally, William et al., “Digital Systems Engineering,” Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK, 2008. |
Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 12/511,352, Oct. 29, 2010. |
Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 12/510,211, Feb. 10, 2011. |
Scalable SerDes Framer Interface (SFI-S): Implementation Agreement for Interfaces beyond 40G for Physical Layer Devices, IA# OIF-SFI-S-01.0, Nov. 2008. |
Von Bueren, George et al, “5.75 to 44Gb/s Quarter Rate CDR with Data Rate Selection in 90nm Bulk CMOS,” 34th European Solid-State Circuits Conference, ESSCIRC, 2008. |
Savoj, Jafar et al., “Design of Half-Rate Clock and Data Recovery Circuits for Optical Communication Systems,” Proceedings of Design Automation Conference, 2001. |
Nedovic, N., U.S. Appl. No. 13/424,728, USPTO, filed Mar. 20, 2012, Symmetric Phase Detector. |
Nedovic, N., U.S. Appl. No. 12/510,211, USPTO, Amendment after non-final Office Action filed Dec. 2, 2010. |
Nedovic, N., U.S. Appl. No. 12/510,211, USPTO, Notice of Appeal and Pre-Brief Appeal filed Jun. 8, 2011. |
Nedovic, N., U.S. Appl. No. 12/510,211, USPTO, Appeal Brief filed Sep. 6, 2011. |
Nedovic, N., U.S. Appl. No. 12/510,211, USPTO, Examiner's Answer to Appeal Brief dated Nov. 10, 2011. |
Nedovic, N., U.S. Appl. No. 12/510,211, USPTO, Reply Brief filed Jan. 9, 2012. |
Nedovic, N., U.S. Appl. No. 12/511,340, USPTO, Amendment after non-final Office Action filed Dec. 28, 2010. |
Nedovic, N., U.S. Appl. No. 12/511,340, USPTO, Notice of Allowance dated Jan. 19, 2012. |
Nedovic, N., U.S. Appl. No. 12/511,352, USPTO, Amendment after non-final Office Action filed Feb. 8, 2011. |
Nedovic, N., U.S. Appl. No. 12/511,352, USPTO, Notice of Allowance dated Aug. 23, 2011. |
Parikh, S., U.S. Appl. No. 12/511,917, USPTO, Non-final Office Action dated May 29, 2012. |
Nedovic, N., U.S. Appl. No. 13/424,728, USPTO, Non-final Office Action dated Apr. 26, 2012. |
Response to USPTO Nonfinal Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 13/424,728, Jul. 26, 2012. |
USPTO Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 13/424,728, Aug. 22, 2012. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20100091927 A1 | Apr 2010 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
61084483 | Jul 2008 | US |