The present invention relates to activation circuits, and more particularly, this invention relates to low-power activation circuits for wireless devices.
Receiving serial data from a source is normally performed by shifting pulses across a medium from one location to another. This medium can be electrical wire or Radio Frequency (RF) signals. When data is received at its destination, the clock and data must be recovered.
One technology area holding much promise for the future of data transmission is the emerging Radio Frequency Identification (RFID) technology. RFID technology employs an RF wireless link and ultra-small embedded computer chips. RFID technology enables such things as allowing physical objects to be identified and tracked via wireless “tags”.
RFID systems, and particularly tags, are designed to operate on minimal power. Passive tags rely on the RF carrier signal for energy. The farther a passive tag is from the source of the carrier signal, the less power is generated. Accordingly, the range of a passive tag from the source of the carrier signal varies as a function of the power requirements of the tag.
Battery powered tags are constrained by a finite battery life, which in turn depends on power consumption. To extend the battery life, portions of active tags are typically powered down during a hibernate period. Upon receiving an activation signal, unpowered portions of the battery powered tag are activated. Thus, power consumption is critical in battery powered tags since any clock recovery circuit at the front end of a serial data input retrieval consumes power as it continuously samples the incoming signal for an activation signal.
Thus, in a low power tag, data signals must be decoded and recovered with minimum power. Current RFID clock recovery circuits use a Phase Locked Loop/Clock Data Recovery (PLL/CDR) circuit to recover the clock from an incoming data stream. One major problem is that the PLL circuit takes a long time to lock and consumes significant area and power, which is undesirable for RFID tags. The lock time can be reduced but it can never approach 2-3 cycles of preamble because it works in a feedback loop. Another traditional method to recover data is to over-sample the data at a higher frequency than the incoming data. Both of these methods consume unacceptable amounts of power, making the methods detrimental for implementation in RFID tags and impractical for such things as remote sensing devices.
What is needed is a low power circuit and method for recovering and decoding an incoming data pattern without requiring an active clock signal. What is also needed is a low power circuit and method for recovering and decoding an activation pattern, indicating that the device (e.g., tag) is to go from the hibernate state to the active state.
The present invention presents a low power circuit and method for recovering and decoding the pattern that indicates the device is to go from the hibernate state to the active state. The methods of data and clock recovery mentioned here can potentially reduce power consumption to 300 nanoAmps (nA) or less. This would result in 7.8 milliAmp (mA)-hours of current consumption in three years.
A circuit for recovering data from an incoming data stream according to one embodiment includes a capacitor and a substantially constant current source for charging the capacitor. A subcircuit generates a signal causing the capacitor to discharge upon detecting a first type of transition in the incoming data stream, the capacitor re-charging upon being at least partially or fully discharged. A comparator compares a voltage on a node coupled to the capacitor to a reference voltage, the comparator outputting a first signal if the voltage on the node is higher than the reference voltage and outputting a second signal if the voltage on the node is lower than the reference voltage, the first signal being associated with a first logic value, the second signal being associated with a second logic value.
A circuit for recovering data from an incoming data stream according to another embodiment includes a time-to-voltage converter for generating first and second signals based on transitions in an incoming data stream, the first signal being associated with a first logic value, the second signal being associated with a second logic value. The circuit also includes logic for identifying transitions in the incoming data stream, the transitions being used to identify individual logic values from the first and second signals.
The circuits presented herein may further include logic for detecting a pattern in the incoming data stream based on the first and second signals. This logic may, for example, generate an interrupt upon detecting the pattern. In further embodiments, additional circuitry is activated upon generation of the interrupt, the additional circuitry being for detecting an activate code in the incoming data stream. The additional circuitry may activate a host device upon detecting the activate code in the incoming data stream.
To eliminate the need for an external clock, transitions in the incoming data stream may be used to identify and store individual logic values.
The circuits presented herein are well adapted for use as part of an activation system of a Radio Frequency Identification (RFID) tag.
A method for recovering data from an incoming data stream includes charging a capacitor and sequentially performing the following sequence: discharging the capacitor upon detecting a first type of transition in the incoming data stream and charging the capacitor after the capacitor is at least partially or fully discharged. A voltage on a node coupled to the capacitor is compared to a reference voltage. A first signal is output if the voltage on the node is higher than the reference voltage, the first signal being associated with a first logic value. A second signal is output if the voltage on the node is lower than the reference voltage, the second signal being associated with a second logic value.
A pattern can be detected in the incoming data stream based on the first and second signals. An interrupt can be generated upon detecting the pattern. Additional circuitry may be activated upon generating the interrupt. The additional circuitry may, for example, analyze the incoming data stream for detecting an activate code in the incoming data stream. If the activate code is detected in the incoming data stream, the additional circuitry may activate a host device.
Another method for recovering data in an incoming data stream, includes using a time-to-voltage converter to generate first and second signals based on transitions in an incoming data stream. The first signal is output if the voltage of the time-to-voltage converter is higher than a reference voltage, the first signal being associated with a first logic value. A second signal is output if the voltage of the time-to-voltage converter is lower than the reference voltage, the second signal being associated with a second logic value. Transitions in the incoming data stream are used to identify individual logic values from the first and second signals.
A RFID system includes a plurality of RFID tags having one or more of the circuits described above or performing a method described above, and an RFID interrogator in communication with the RFID tags.
Other aspects and advantages of the present invention will become apparent from the following detailed description, which, when taken in conjunction with the drawings, illustrate by way of example the principles of the invention.
For a fuller understanding of the nature and advantages of the present invention, as well as the preferred mode of use, reference should be made to the following detailed description read in conjunction with the accompanying drawings.
The following description is the best embodiment presently contemplated for carrying out the present invention. This description is made for the purpose of illustrating the general principles of the present invention and is not meant to limit the inventive concepts claimed herein.
The following specification describes systems and methods which can recover, decode and/or identify a particular data pattern in an incoming data stream with very low power consumption and without reliance on a clock signal.
Many types of devices can take advantage of the embodiments disclosed herein, including but not limited to Radio Frequency Identification (RFID) systems and other wireless devices/systems; pacemakers; portable electronic devices; audio devices and other electronic devices; smoke detectors; etc. To provide a context, and to aid in understanding the embodiments of the invention, much of the present description shall be presented in terms of an RFID system such as that shown in
As shown in
Communication begins with a reader 104 sending out signals to find the tag 102. When the radio wave hits the tag 102 and the tag 102 recognizes and responds to the reader's signal, the reader 104 decodes the data programmed into the tag 102. The information is then passed to a server 106 for processing, storage, and/or propagation to another computing device. By tagging a variety of items, information about the nature and location of goods can be known instantly and automatically.
Many RFID systems use reflected or “backscattered” radio frequency (RF) waves to transmit information from the tag 102 to the reader 104. Since passive (Class-1 and Class-2) tags get all of their power from the reader signal, the tags are only powered when in the beam of the reader 104.
The Auto ID Center EPC-Compliant tag classes are set forth below:
Class-1
Class-2
Class-3
Class-4
In RFID systems where passive receivers (i.e., Class-1 and Class-2 tags) are able to capture enough energy from the transmitted RF to power the device, no batteries are necessary. In systems where distance prevents powering a device in this manner, an alternative power source must be used. For these “alternate” systems (also known as active or semi-passive), batteries are the most common form of power. This greatly increases read range, and the reliability of tag reads, because the tag doesn't need power from the reader. Class-3 tags only need a 10 mV signal from the reader in comparison to the 500 mV that a Class-1 tag needs to operate. This 2,500:1 reduction in power requirement permits Class-3 tags to operate out to a distance of 100 meters or more compared with a Class-1 range of only about 3 meters.
Embodiments of the present invention are preferably implemented in a Class-3 or higher Class chip.
A battery activation circuit 214 is also present to act as a wake-up trigger. In brief, the battery activation circuit 214 may include an ultra-low-power, narrow-bandwidth preamplifier with an ultra low power static current drain. The battery activation circuit 214 may also include a self-clocking interrupt circuit and uses an innovative user-programmable digital wake-up code. The battery activation circuit 214 draws less power during its sleeping state and is much better protected against both accidental and malicious false wake-up trigger events that otherwise would lead to pre-mature exhaustion of the Class-3 tag battery 210.
A battery monitor 215 can be provided to monitor power usage in the device. The information collected can then be used to estimate a useful remaining life of the battery.
A forward link AM decoder 216 uses a simplified phase-lock-loop oscillator that requires an absolute minimum amount of chip area. Preferably, the circuit 216 requires only a minimum string of reference pulses.
A backscatter modulator block 218 preferably increases the backscatter modulation depth to more than 50%.
A memory cell, e.g., EEPROM is also present. In one embodiment, a pure, Fowler-Nordheim direct-tunneling-through-oxide mechanism 220 is present to reduce both the WRITE and ERASE currents to less than 0.1 μA/cell in the EEPROM memory array. Unlike any RFID tags built to date, this will permit designing of tags to operate at maximum range even when WRITE and ERASE operations are being performed.
The module 200 may also incorporates a highly-simplified, yet very effective, security encryption circuit 222. Other security schemes, secret handshakes with readers, etc. can be used.
Only four connection pads (not shown) are required for the chip 200 to function: Vdd to the battery, ground, plus two antenna leads to support multi-element omni-directional antennas. Sensors to monitor temperature, shock, tampering, etc. can be added by appending an industry-standard I2C interface to the core chip.
It should be kept in mind that the present invention can be implemented in any type of tag, and the circuit 200 described above is presented as only one possible implementation.
The description below describes a circuit that can recover and decode a pattern in an incoming signal. To place the invention in context, much of the description will be written in terms of a tag activation process. However, it is to be understood that the circuits described herein have application beyond such activation processes and systems.
The basic features of the “Activate” command 300 are:
The preamble portion 302 of the Activate command 300 preferably includes a predefined clock synchronization signal at an incoming rate of, for example, 8 KHz, which in this example represents a logic-0.
The next section is the Interrupt or violation section 304. This may include, for example, two cycles of 50% duty cycle based on a 2 KHz incoming rate (two instances of a logic-1). The interrupt marks the beginning of the code section which is the third component of the Activate command. By observing the interrupt portion 304, the receiver (tag) will realize that it has received an “Activate” command. Correct reception of the interrupt portion 304 moves the tag from the hibernate state into the code search state. A device (tag) preferably will only stay in the code search state for a maximum time period, such as 1-5 ms, preferably ˜2 ms. If the tag is not moved into the ready or active state within that time, the tag will automatically revert back into the hibernate state. A circuit for generating a timeout period without requiring a running clock is also described below.
The receiving device listens for the interrupt, in this example a logic 1-1 in sequence. Upon encountering any logic 1-1, the device then processes the incoming activate code 306 as described below. If a value in the next sequence of bits matches a value stored locally on the receiving device, the device wakes up. If one of the bits in the sequence fails to match, the device resets, looks for the next interrupt, and begins monitoring the sequence of bits after the next interrupt (here, logic 1-1). It should be noted that a logic 1-1 in the activate code portion 306 will not cause the device to begin analyzing the incoming bit stream again because the interrupt detection circuit will not function after issuing an interrupt signal until either the activation code search is completed or a pre-set time-out period is reached. However, if the code does not match the device will reset again.
The activate code portion 306, according to one embodiment, can be described in two parts: first the signaling or communications protocol, and second the command protocol. Signaling can be described as two different frequencies where, for example, a one is observed as a 2 KHz tone and a zero is observed as an 8 KHz tone. These two tones (otherwise described as FQF for frequency, quad frequency) describe a command, which when matching an internal register, move the tag from a hibernate state to an active state (ready state in the state machine).
While the tag is waiting to activate, preferably no clock is running in order to minimize power consumption. The following description describes how an activate command 300 can be decoded and identified from an incoming data stream without requiring an incoming clock signal. Again, it should be noted that the incoming data stream need not be an activate command as presented here by way of example, but rather can be any incoming signal.
With a specific incoming data sequence of known pulse widths, such as where one pulse width is 4× the other pulse width as in the preamble portion 302 or interrupt portion 304 of the activate command 300 (
As mentioned above, the reset of the capacitor 402 (
The time constant of the capacitor is important, as it should correlate somewhat to the 8 or 2 kHz period (or whichever period is being used) in the sense that the time constant allows differentiation between the two pulse widths. Referring again to
On the device, in the example where a logic-1-1 triggers the interrupt, only the first stage of the activation circuit consumes switching current until the first two consecutive logic-1 data pulses in the incoming stream initiate an interrupt signal that triggers activation of additional portions of the activation circuit 800. After issuing an interrupt, the logic searching for the interrupt in the incoming data stream is preferably stopped. The capacitor continues to be charged and discharged in relation to the incoming data pattern of 2 KHz or 8 KHz pulse width data. The clock recovered is the data that is passed to additional logic to serially capture the data. The data is determined by the pulse width with a 2 KHz signal represented as a logic-1 and an 8 Khz pulse represented as a logic-0 (or vice versa). Depending on the specific input data stream after interrupt, e.g., if the data stream matches an activate command, the rest of the device may then activate. This activation preferably disables the activation circuit and data will then pass directly to the general logic section of the device and be recovered by conventional clock oversampling means. After the activation sequence is complete, unnecessary portions of the device de-activate and the activation circuit is enabled to again monitor the incoming data stream for the interrupt pattern and activation sequence.
With continued reference to
If a value in the next sequence of bits matches a value stored locally on the receiving device, here in EEPROM 810, the device wakes up (as described below). If one of the bits in the sequence fails to match, the device resets, looks for the next interrupt, and begins monitoring the sequence of bits after the next interrupt (here, logic 1-1). It should be noted that a logic 1-1 in the activate code portion 306 (
With continued reference to
Meanwhile, the data from the time-to-voltage converter 400 is passed to a digital block, along with a clock that is based on the high to low transitions (or vice versa) in the incoming data stream Vin. The data is clocked into a shift register 814. When 32 bits (or however many are used) are loaded into the shift register 814, as indicated by the counter 812, the values in the shift register 814 are compared with the activation code stored in memory 810 and optionally loaded into a second shift register 818. If the code matches, an activation signal Activate is generated.
When the activate signal Activate is sent, or when the counter 812 reaches a predetermined value (here, 32), a stop signal STOP is sent to stop the clock from being sent out to the digital block. This is accomplished in this embodiment by passing the stop signal STOP to an OR gate 820 to stop the clock signal passing through.
When all functions in the digital block have been completed, a clear signal Clear is generated. The clear signal Clear clears the register and interrupt flip flops, so that the circuit begins searching for an activate signal again. The clear signal Clear can be controlled, for example, by either power-on-reset or digital state machine.
A delay circuit 822 generates a timeout, e.g., >60 ms delay, which can trigger the clear signal Clear. The way the delay circuit fits in is that if noise gets into the incoming data stream or system, the circuit 800 may not recognize the activate code and the digital block remains inactive. If the interrogator, e.g., tag reader, does not receive a response back from the host device, the interrogator can resend the code until the host device responds.
One embodiment of the delay circuit 822 charges and discharges a capacitor, creating a ramp up and a ramp down. The charging and discharging of the capacitor continues in a loop. A clock is generated from the ramping. For example, the delay circuit 822 can use a 1 ms up and 1 ms down capacitor charge/discharge cycle, which creates a 2 ms pulse width. The charge up triggers a one shot. Then the current source is switched to charge the capacitor down. Once the capacitor charges down, the delay circuit creates another one shot. This cycle is repeated. The resulting signals are processed to generate sharp edges representing a clock signal.
The clock thus generated can be divided down until a prespecified time is reached. The delay circuit 822 then sends a timeout signal (which can be the same as the clear signal Clear), instructing the digital block to reset and begin searching for the activate code again. Thus, a delay is generated without requiring a clocking signal from outside the circuit, e.g., from a PLL/CDR.
An implementation of the comparator 406 is shown in
Logic necessary to decode the initial interrupt sequence and then to pass data and clock to the next stage to determine that actual activation code sequence is shown in
The methods of data and clock recovery mentioned here can potentially reduce power consumption to 300 nA or less. This would result in 7.8 mA-hours of current consumption in three years.
While various embodiments have been described above, it should be understood that they have been presented by way of example only, and not limitation. Thus, the breadth and scope of a preferred embodiment should not be limited by any of the above-described exemplary embodiments, but should be defined only in accordance with the following claims and their equivalents.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
3689885 | Kaplan et al. | Sep 1972 | A |
3890581 | Stuart et al. | Jun 1975 | A |
4325146 | Lennington | Apr 1982 | A |
4525713 | Barletta et al. | Jun 1985 | A |
4646090 | Mawhinney | Feb 1987 | A |
4730188 | Milheiser | Mar 1988 | A |
4839642 | Batz et al. | Jun 1989 | A |
4879756 | Stevens et al. | Nov 1989 | A |
4928275 | Moore et al. | May 1990 | A |
4937586 | Stevens et al. | Jun 1990 | A |
4955038 | Lee et al. | Sep 1990 | A |
5028918 | Giles et al. | Jul 1991 | A |
5041826 | Milheiser | Aug 1991 | A |
5109221 | Lambropoulos et al. | Apr 1992 | A |
5166676 | Milheiser | Nov 1992 | A |
5245332 | Katzenstein | Sep 1993 | A |
5305008 | Turner et al. | Apr 1994 | A |
5345231 | Koo et al. | Sep 1994 | A |
5410315 | Huber | Apr 1995 | A |
5489908 | Orthmann et al. | Feb 1996 | A |
5491482 | Dingwall et al. | Feb 1996 | A |
5502445 | Dingwall et al. | Mar 1996 | A |
5521601 | Kandlur et al. | May 1996 | A |
5525992 | Froschermeier | Jun 1996 | A |
5530702 | Palmer et al. | Jun 1996 | A |
5548291 | Meier et al. | Aug 1996 | A |
5550536 | Flaxl | Aug 1996 | A |
5606313 | Allen et al. | Feb 1997 | A |
5621412 | Sharpe et al. | Apr 1997 | A |
5673037 | Cesar et al. | Sep 1997 | A |
5684828 | Bolan et al. | Nov 1997 | A |
5774064 | Lambropoulos et al. | Jun 1998 | A |
5790607 | Burke et al. | Aug 1998 | A |
5838257 | Lambropoulos | Nov 1998 | A |
5856788 | Walter et al. | Jan 1999 | A |
5887176 | Griffith et al. | Mar 1999 | A |
6104333 | Wood, Jr. | Aug 2000 | A |
6130602 | O'Toole et al. | Oct 2000 | A |
6130603 | Briechle | Oct 2000 | A |
6150921 | Werb et al. | Nov 2000 | A |
6172596 | Cesar et al. | Jan 2001 | B1 |
6177858 | Raimbault et al. | Jan 2001 | B1 |
6239690 | Burbidge et al. | May 2001 | B1 |
6249212 | Beigel et al. | Jun 2001 | B1 |
6265963 | Wood, Jr. | Jul 2001 | B1 |
6278698 | O'Toole et al. | Aug 2001 | B1 |
6310558 | Minami | Oct 2001 | B1 |
6329944 | Richardson et al. | Dec 2001 | B1 |
6333690 | Nelson et al. | Dec 2001 | B1 |
6337634 | O'Toole et al. | Jan 2002 | B1 |
6342830 | Want et al. | Jan 2002 | B1 |
6351215 | Rodgers et al. | Feb 2002 | B2 |
6353406 | Lanzl et al. | Mar 2002 | B1 |
6362738 | Vega | Mar 2002 | B1 |
6388575 | Galloway | May 2002 | B1 |
6411199 | Geiszler et al. | Jun 2002 | B1 |
6452980 | Zalud et al. | Sep 2002 | B1 |
6466634 | O'Toole et al. | Oct 2002 | B1 |
6469618 | Gaultier | Oct 2002 | B1 |
6535109 | Mahdavi | Mar 2003 | B1 |
6593845 | Friedman et al. | Jul 2003 | B1 |
6600428 | O'Toole et al. | Jul 2003 | B1 |
6603391 | Greeff et al. | Aug 2003 | B1 |
6611198 | Geiszler et al. | Aug 2003 | B1 |
6617963 | Watters et al. | Sep 2003 | B1 |
6630885 | Hardman et al. | Oct 2003 | B2 |
6653937 | Nelson et al. | Nov 2003 | B2 |
6661336 | Atkins et al. | Dec 2003 | B1 |
6690264 | Dalglish | Feb 2004 | B2 |
6693511 | Seal | Feb 2004 | B1 |
6696879 | O'Toole et al. | Feb 2004 | B1 |
6721289 | O'Toole et al. | Apr 2004 | B1 |
6735183 | O'Toole et al. | May 2004 | B2 |
6765476 | Steele et al. | Jul 2004 | B2 |
6765484 | Eagleson et al. | Jul 2004 | B2 |
6771613 | O'Toole et al. | Aug 2004 | B1 |
6774685 | O'Toole et al. | Aug 2004 | B2 |
6781353 | Rozsypal | Aug 2004 | B2 |
6831548 | Eber et al. | Dec 2004 | B1 |
6971058 | Evans et al. | Nov 2005 | B2 |
7016450 | Lin et al. | Mar 2006 | B2 |
20010050580 | O'Toole et al. | Dec 2001 | A1 |
20020024422 | Turner et al. | Feb 2002 | A1 |
20020063622 | Armstrong et al. | May 2002 | A1 |
20020109597 | Nelson et al. | Aug 2002 | A1 |
20020126005 | Hardman et al. | Sep 2002 | A1 |
20020175805 | Armstrong et al. | Nov 2002 | A9 |
20020175806 | Marneweck et al. | Nov 2002 | A1 |
20030104848 | Brideglall | Jun 2003 | A1 |
20030128100 | Burkhardt et al. | Jul 2003 | A1 |
20030149526 | Zhou et al. | Aug 2003 | A1 |
20030178974 | Rozsypal | Sep 2003 | A1 |
20040017291 | Hardman et al. | Jan 2004 | A1 |
20040027240 | Greeff et al. | Feb 2004 | A1 |
20040046642 | Becker et al. | Mar 2004 | A1 |
20040140884 | Gallagher, III et al. | Jul 2004 | A1 |
20040160306 | Stilp | Aug 2004 | A1 |
20040160309 | Stilp | Aug 2004 | A1 |
20040201457 | O'Toole et al. | Oct 2004 | A1 |
20040223481 | Juels et al. | Nov 2004 | A1 |
20050052283 | Collins et al. | Mar 2005 | A1 |
20050057368 | Corbett et al. | Mar 2005 | A1 |
20050077349 | Bonalle et al. | Apr 2005 | A1 |
20050121526 | Stewart et al. | Jun 2005 | A1 |
20050220089 | Kawashima | Oct 2005 | A1 |
20050225433 | Diorio et al. | Oct 2005 | A1 |
Entry |
---|
International Search Report and Written Opinion from PCT Application No. PCT/US2006/46341 mailed on Oct. 9, 2007. |
International Preliminary Report on Patentability from PCT Application No. PCT/US06/46341 dated Jan. 28, 2011. |
Chinese Office Action from Application No. 200680051389.6 mailed Jul. 6, 2011. |
Japanese Office Action from Application No. 545640/2008 mailed Sep. 6, 2011. |
Japanese Office Action from application No. 2008-545640 dated Feb. 5, 2013 (no translation). |
Japanese Office Action from application No. 2008-545640 dated Sep. 4, 2012. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20070141983 A1 | Jun 2007 | US |