The present invention relates in general to time distribution, particularly but not exclusively to time distribution in virtual environments, and further particularly but not exclusively to PTP distribution in virtual environments.
Precision Time Protocol (PTP), which is defined inter alia, in IEEE 1588-2002 and in IEEE 1588-2008, is a protocol useful for synchronizing clocks in a computer network. The mention of particular IEEE documents is not intended to be limiting; it is anticipated that exemplary embodiments of the present invention will also be useful in other contexts, including but not limited to future versions of IEEE 1588.
The present invention, in certain embodiments thereof, seeks to provide an improved system for time synchronization (particularly but not exclusively for PTP time synchronization), suitable particularly, but not exclusively, for PTP distribution in virtual environments.
There is thus provided in accordance with an exemplary embodiment of the present invention apparatus including a shared device in communication with a plurality of computing machines external to the shared device, the shared device including at least one PTP domain coefficient storage area, the at least one PTP domain coefficient storage area receiving a PTP coefficient from a computing machine having a PTP client, and providing the PTP coefficient to a computing machine not having a PTP client.
Further in accordance with an exemplary embodiment of the present invention the computing machine not having a PTP client includes a plurality of computing machines not having a PTP client.
Still further in accordance with an exemplary embodiment of the present invention each computing machine includes a virtual machine.
Additionally in accordance with an exemplary embodiment of the present invention upon receiving a PTP coefficient from a computing machine having a PTP client, the shared device sends an update event to a computing machine not having a PTP client.
Moreover in accordance with an exemplary embodiment of the present invention upon receiving a PTP coefficient from a computing machine having a PTP client, the shared device sends an update event to each computing machine not having a PTP client.
Further in accordance with an exemplary embodiment of the present invention at least one computing machine having a PTP client is in communication with a PTP grandmaster external thereto.
There is also provided in accordance with another exemplary embodiment of the present invention a method including providing a shared device in communication with a plurality of computing machines external to the shared device, the shared device including at least one PTP domain coefficient storage area, the at least one PTP domain coefficient storage area receiving a PTP coefficient from a computing machine having a PTP client, and the at least one PTP domain coefficient storage area providing the PTP coefficient to a computing machine not having a PTP client.
Further in accordance with an exemplary embodiment of the present invention the computing machine not having a PTP client includes a plurality of computing machines not having a PTP client.
Still further in accordance with an exemplary embodiment of the present invention each computing machine includes a virtual machine.
Additionally in accordance with an exemplary embodiment of the present invention upon receiving a PTP coefficient from a computing machine having a PTP client, the shared device sends an update event to a computing machine not having a PTP client.
Moreover in accordance with an exemplary embodiment of the present invention upon receiving a PTP coefficient from a computing machine having a PTP client, the shared device sends an update event to each computing machine not having a PTP client.
Further in accordance with an exemplary embodiment of the present invention at least one computing machine having a PTP client is in communication with a PTP grandmaster external thereto.
There is also provided in accordance with another exemplary embodiment of the present invention apparatus including shared means for communicating with a plurality of computing machines external to the shared means, and at least one PTP domain coefficient storage means, the at least one PTP domain coefficient storage means receiving a PTP coefficient from a computing machine having a PTP client, and providing the PTP coefficient to a computing machine not having a PTP client.
The present invention will be understood and appreciated more fully from the following detailed description, taken in conjunction with the drawings in which:
In the context of providing/distributing time synchronization (of which PTP is one particular non-limiting example, used herein for simplicity of description and without limiting the generality of the present invention) in virtual environments, the inventors of the present invention believe that in currently known systems a PTP slave is used per virtual machine (VM) (virtual machines being used by way of non-limiting example, it being appreciated that a computing machine which is not a virtual machine may alternatively be used). The PTP slave synchronizes the relevant time on the virtual machine, where the PTP slave runs based on synchronization (directly or indirectly via a PTP master) to a PTP grandmaster clock. When using PTP in a virtual machine environment in such a way, the inventors of the present invention believe that there are several drawbacks at least:
1. Each PTP client generates its own PTP traffic which causes load on the network and on the PTP grandmaster server, especially when there is a large number of VMs. Furthermore, the PTP grandmaster is limited in the amount of PTP clients that can be supported.
2. Generally speaking, a given physical device (computer) on which a plurality of virtual machines are instantiated usually has a single hardware (HW) clock and hence only a single PTP client can use the HW clock, while the rest of the PTP clients use a software (SW) clock which is less accurate.
In exemplary embodiments, as described herein, one or more of the following advantages may be obtained:
1. Security is enhanced, as various virtual machines do not communicate directly (compare to the situation shown in
2. Efficiency is enhanced, since the PTP master need not update every PTP client (again, compare to the situation shown in
3. Ease of management is enhanced, since each PTP client registers to the same place, and need not find an appropriate PTP master to which to register.
A general view of a system in accordance with such exemplary embodiments, as described in more detail below, is shown in
Reference is now made to
It is appreciated that, as is known in the art, each of VM0/HV0102, VM1/HV1104, VM2/HV2106, VM3/HV3108, . . . and VMn/HVn 110 is instantiated within a host device 112 (shown as a single host device 112, although it is appreciated that, in alternative exemplary embodiments, more than one host device may be used, with each host device having one or a plurality of virtual machines); the host device 112 fills the role of the physical computer as described above.
The host device 112 includes a PTP master 114, which may be in communication with a PTP grandmaster (not shown) external to the system of
An exemplary mode of operation of the system of
Certain of the virtual machines shown in
Similarly, domain 1 PTP client 120 and domain 2 PTP client 122 send PTP coefficient parameters, via the client synchronization driver 126, to a domain coefficient storage area 142 for domains 1 and 2, respectively. Then, each clock synchronization client 134, 136, and 138 receives PTP coefficient parameters for its time domain via the respective client synchronization driver 128, 130, 132 from the appropriate coefficient storage area 142 for the appropriate PTP domain. By way of non-limiting example, it is appreciated that a given PTP domain might represent PTP time for a given time zone.
The drawbacks mentioned above may be overcome by using the system of
Reference is now additionally made to
A shared memory (e.g., shown in
When a PTP client/provider's clock (for example, PTP clock) is updated, it updates (reference numeral 220) the driver for the virtual machine on which that client/provider runs, and the shared memory is also updated by the master synchronization unit (which may, e.g., may be implemented in firmware, hardware or software) that then runs with the new coefficient parameters. Once the shared memory is updated, an update event (reference numeral 230) to all clock synchronization clients of the domain is generated by the master synchronization unit. The clock synchronization client driver updates PTP timestamp (TS) and provides appropriate timing (generally world clock timing, such as, by way of non-limiting example: UTC; TAI; GPS; or another appropriate timing), according to the coefficient parameters provided by the time provider. The clock synchronization client updates its coefficient parameters, typically each time an update event is received.
More specifically, the update is done from the time providers to the clock synchronization clients. The update event generally includes appropriate adjustment-relevant information (also referred to herein and in the drawings as “coefficient”) and allows the clock synchronization clients to adjust the time (such as PTP time) according to their respective domains. For example, such an update event may include an adjustment offset and a frequency offset from a domain's hardware clock, which will allow a clock synchronization client to reconstruct PTP time from hardware time.
Update process: A PTP client on the time provider machine synchronizes to the PTP grandmaster using PTP protocol, such synching being a well-known PTP process. Once the PTP client updates the hardware clock in accordance with the PTP time thus obtained, the shared device (as also mentioned above) generates an update event to the clock synchronization clients, announcing the update. In exemplary embodiments, the clock synchronization clients use the most updated coefficient parameters available to them in order to translate the hardware clock time available to them to PTP format.
Reference is now additionally made to
It is appreciated that software components of the present invention may, if desired, be implemented in ROM (read only memory) form. The software components may, generally, be implemented in hardware, if desired, using conventional techniques. It is further appreciated that the software components may be instantiated, for example: as a computer program product or on a tangible medium. In some cases, it may be possible to instantiate the software components as a signal interpretable by an appropriate computer, although such an instantiation may be excluded in certain embodiments of the present invention.
It is appreciated that various features of the invention which are, for clarity, described in the contexts of separate embodiments may also be provided in combination in a single embodiment. Conversely, various features of the invention which are, for brevity, described in the context of a single embodiment may also be provided separately or in any suitable subcombination.
It will be appreciated by persons skilled in the art that the present invention is not limited by what has been particularly shown and described hereinabove.
The present application claims priority from U.S. Provisional Patent Application Ser. 62/768,920 of Almog et al, filed 18 Nov. 2018.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
5392421 | Lennartsson | Feb 1995 | A |
5402394 | Turski | Mar 1995 | A |
5416808 | Witsaman et al. | May 1995 | A |
5491792 | Grisham et al. | Feb 1996 | A |
5564285 | Jurewicz et al. | Oct 1996 | A |
5592486 | Lo et al. | Jan 1997 | A |
5896524 | Halstead, Jr. et al. | Apr 1999 | A |
6055246 | Jones | Apr 2000 | A |
6084856 | Simmons et al. | Jul 2000 | A |
6144714 | Bleiweiss et al. | Nov 2000 | A |
6199169 | Voth | Mar 2001 | B1 |
6289023 | Dowling et al. | Sep 2001 | B1 |
6449291 | Burns et al. | Sep 2002 | B1 |
6535926 | Esker | Mar 2003 | B1 |
6556638 | Blackburn | Apr 2003 | B1 |
6918049 | Lamb et al. | Jul 2005 | B2 |
7111184 | Thomas, Jr. et al. | Sep 2006 | B2 |
7191354 | Purho | Mar 2007 | B2 |
7245627 | Goldenberg et al. | Jul 2007 | B2 |
7254646 | Aguilera et al. | Aug 2007 | B2 |
7334124 | Pham et al. | Feb 2008 | B2 |
7412475 | Govindarajalu | Aug 2008 | B1 |
7440474 | Goldman et al. | Oct 2008 | B1 |
7447975 | Riley | Nov 2008 | B2 |
7483448 | Bhandari et al. | Jan 2009 | B2 |
7496686 | Coyle | Feb 2009 | B2 |
7535933 | Zerbe et al. | May 2009 | B2 |
7623552 | Jordan et al. | Nov 2009 | B2 |
7636767 | Lev-Ran et al. | Dec 2009 | B2 |
7650158 | Indirabhai | Jan 2010 | B2 |
7656751 | Rischar et al. | Feb 2010 | B2 |
7750685 | Bunch et al. | Jul 2010 | B1 |
7904713 | Zajkowski et al. | Mar 2011 | B1 |
7941684 | Serebrin et al. | May 2011 | B2 |
8065052 | Fredriksson et al. | Nov 2011 | B2 |
8341454 | Kondapalli | Dec 2012 | B1 |
8370675 | Kagan | Feb 2013 | B2 |
8407478 | Kagan et al. | Mar 2013 | B2 |
8607086 | Cullimore | Dec 2013 | B2 |
8699406 | Charles et al. | Apr 2014 | B1 |
8879552 | Zheng | Nov 2014 | B2 |
8930647 | Smith | Jan 2015 | B1 |
9344265 | Karnes | May 2016 | B2 |
9397960 | Arad et al. | Jul 2016 | B2 |
9979998 | Pogue et al. | May 2018 | B1 |
10027601 | Narkis et al. | Jul 2018 | B2 |
10054977 | Mikhaylov et al. | Aug 2018 | B2 |
10164759 | Volpe | Dec 2018 | B1 |
10320646 | Mirsky et al. | Jun 2019 | B2 |
10637776 | Iwasaki | Apr 2020 | B2 |
10727966 | Izenberg | Jul 2020 | B1 |
20010006500 | Nakajima et al. | Jul 2001 | A1 |
20020027886 | Fischer et al. | Mar 2002 | A1 |
20040096013 | Laturell et al. | May 2004 | A1 |
20040153907 | Gibart | Aug 2004 | A1 |
20050033947 | Morris et al. | Feb 2005 | A1 |
20050268183 | Barmettler | Dec 2005 | A1 |
20060109376 | Chaffee et al. | May 2006 | A1 |
20070008044 | Shimamoto | Jan 2007 | A1 |
20070072451 | Tazawa et al. | Mar 2007 | A1 |
20070104098 | Kimura et al. | May 2007 | A1 |
20070124415 | Lev-Ran et al. | May 2007 | A1 |
20070159924 | Vook et al. | Jul 2007 | A1 |
20070266119 | Ohly | Nov 2007 | A1 |
20080069150 | Badt et al. | Mar 2008 | A1 |
20080285597 | Downey et al. | Nov 2008 | A1 |
20090257458 | Cui et al. | Oct 2009 | A1 |
20100189206 | Kagan | Jul 2010 | A1 |
20100280858 | Bugenhagen | Nov 2010 | A1 |
20110182191 | Jackson | Jul 2011 | A1 |
20120076319 | Terwal | Mar 2012 | A1 |
20130045014 | Mottahedin et al. | Feb 2013 | A1 |
20130215889 | Zheng et al. | Aug 2013 | A1 |
20130294144 | Wang et al. | Nov 2013 | A1 |
20130315265 | Webb, III et al. | Nov 2013 | A1 |
20140185632 | Steiner et al. | Jul 2014 | A1 |
20140253387 | Gunn et al. | Sep 2014 | A1 |
20140321285 | Chew et al. | Oct 2014 | A1 |
20150078405 | Roberts | Mar 2015 | A1 |
20150127978 | Cui | May 2015 | A1 |
20150318941 | Zheng et al. | Nov 2015 | A1 |
20160072602 | Earl et al. | Mar 2016 | A1 |
20160110211 | Karnes | Apr 2016 | A1 |
20160112182 | Karnes | Apr 2016 | A1 |
20160277138 | Garg | Sep 2016 | A1 |
20160315756 | Tenea et al. | Oct 2016 | A1 |
20170005903 | Mirsky | Jan 2017 | A1 |
20170302392 | Farra | Oct 2017 | A1 |
20170359137 | Butterworth et al. | Dec 2017 | A1 |
20180059167 | Sharf et al. | Mar 2018 | A1 |
20180152286 | Kemparaj | May 2018 | A1 |
20180191802 | Yang | Jul 2018 | A1 |
20180227067 | Hu | Aug 2018 | A1 |
20190014526 | Bader et al. | Jan 2019 | A1 |
20190089615 | Branscomb | Mar 2019 | A1 |
20190149258 | Araki et al. | May 2019 | A1 |
20190158909 | Kulkarni et al. | May 2019 | A1 |
20190273571 | Bordogna et al. | Sep 2019 | A1 |
20190319729 | Leong et al. | Oct 2019 | A1 |
20190349392 | Wetterwald | Nov 2019 | A1 |
20200304224 | Neugeboren | Sep 2020 | A1 |
20200331480 | Zhang et al. | Oct 2020 | A1 |
20200344333 | Hawari et al. | Oct 2020 | A1 |
20200396050 | Perras et al. | Dec 2020 | A1 |
20200401434 | Thampi et al. | Dec 2020 | A1 |
20210218431 | Narayanan et al. | Jul 2021 | A1 |
20210297230 | Dror et al. | Sep 2021 | A1 |
20210318978 | Hsung | Oct 2021 | A1 |
20220066978 | Mishra et al. | Mar 2022 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
106817183 | Jun 2017 | CN |
108829493 | Nov 2018 | CN |
1215559 | Sep 2007 | EP |
2770678 | Aug 2014 | EP |
2011091676 | May 2011 | JP |
2012007276 | Jan 2012 | WO |
2013124782 | Aug 2013 | WO |
2013143112 | Oct 2013 | WO |
2014029533 | Feb 2014 | WO |
Entry |
---|
Weibel, H., “High Precision Clock Synchronization according to IEEE 1588 Implementation and Performance Issues”, Zurich University of Applied Sciences, pp. 1-9, Jan. 17, 2005. |
Lu et al., “A Fast CRC Update Implementation”, Computer Engineering Laboratory, Electrical Engineering Department, pp. 113-120, Oct. 8, 2003. |
Dlugy-Hegwer et al., “Designing and Testing IEEE 1588 Timing Networks”, Symmetricom, pp. 1-10, Jan. 2007. |
Mellanox Technologies, “How to test 1PPS on Mellanox Adapters”, pp. 1-6, Oct. 22, 2019 downloaded from https://community.mellanox.com/s/article/How-To-Test-1PPS-on-Mellanox-Adapters. |
IEEE Standard 1588™—2008: “IEEE Standard for a Precision Clock Synchronization Protocol for Networked Measurement and Control Systems”, IEEE Instrumentation and Measurement Society, Revision of IEEE Standard 1588-2002, USA, pp. 1-289, Jul. 24, 2008. |
Weibel et al., “Implementation and Performance of Time Stamping Techniques”, 2004 Conference on IEEE 1588, pp. 1-29, Sep. 28, 2004. |
Working Draft Project American National Standard T10/1799-D, “Information Technology—SCSI Block Commands—3 (SBC-3)”, pp. 1-220, Revision 19, May 29, 2009. |
“Infiniband Architecture: Specification vol. 1”, pp. 1-1727, Release 1.2.1, Infiniband Trade Association, Nov. 2007. |
Mellanox Technologies, “Mellanox ConnectX IB: Dual-Port InfiniBand Adapter Cards with PCI Express 2.0”, pp. 1-2, USA, year 2008. |
Gaist et al., U.S. Appl. No. 16/199,312, filed Nov. 26, 2018. |
Levi et al., U.S. Appl. No. 16/779,611, filed Feb. 2, 2020. |
Wikiepdia—“Precision Time Protocol”, pp. 1-8, Aug. 24, 2019. |
IEEE Std 1588-2002, “IEEE Standard for a Precision Clock Synchronization Protocol for Networked Measurement and Control Systems”, IEEE Instrumentation and Measurement Society, pp. 1-154, Nov. 8, 2002. |
ITU-T recommendation, “G.8273.2/Y.1368.2—Timing characteristics of telecom boundary clocks and telecom time slave clocks”, pp. 1-50, Jan. 2017. |
Texas Instruments, “LMK05318 Ultra-Low Jitter Network Synchronizer Clock With Two Frequency Domains,” Product Folder, pp. 1-86, Dec. 2018. |
IPCLOCK, “IEEE 1588 Primer,” ip-clock.com, pp. 1-3, May 1, 2017 (downloaded from https://web.archive.org/web/20170501192647/http://ip-clock.com/ieee-1588-primer/). |
U.S. Appl. No. 16/900,931 Office Action dated Apr. 28, 2022. |
U.S. Appl. No. 17/191,736 Office Action dated Apr. 26, 2022. |
U.S. Appl. No. 16/779,611 Office Action dated Mar. 17, 2022. |
U.S. Appl. No. 17/120,313 Office Action dated Mar. 28, 2022. |
EP Application # 21214269 Search Report dated May 2, 2022. |
U.S. Appl. No. 17/148,605 Office Action dated May 17, 2022. |
“Precision Time Protocol,” PTP Clock Types, CISCO, pp. 1-52, Jul. 30, 2020, as downloaded from https://www.cisco.com/c/en/us/td/docs/dcn/aci/apic/5x/system-management-configuration/cisco-apic-system-management-configuration-guide-52x/m-precision-time-protocol.pdf. |
EP Application #22151451.6 Search Report dated Jun. 17, 2022. |
U.S. Appl. No. 16/779,611 Office Action dated Jun. 24, 2022. |
U.S. Appl. No. 17/120,313 Office Action dated Aug. 29, 2022. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20200162234 A1 | May 2020 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
62768920 | Nov 2018 | US |