Embodiments taught herein are related to shiftable sleeves for opening and closing ports in a tubular and, more particularly, to sleeves, which can be shifted between open and closed positions one or more times.
Sleeve valve assemblies installed in a completion string, such as casing, are known for opening and closing ports to facilitate production and/or treatment of the formation, such as in a fracturing operation. The sleeves are general releasably retained over the ports in a closed position and are actuated to slide or shift within the casing to open the ports. Many different types of sleeves and apparatus to actuate the sleeves are known in the industry.
In wellbore operations, fluids delivered to the wellbore, such as from a treatment tool run into the casing and a bore of the sleeve, are directed into the formation through the open ports. At least one sealing means, such as a packer, is employed to isolate the balance of the wellbore from the treatment fluids, such as below the sleeve.
It is known that tools, such as treatment tools and the like are often set high or low with respect to the sleeve largely because the sleeve has not been positively located within the casing. Failures to properly locate the tool in the casing are costly.
Further, it has been noted that over time and operation of a plurality of open/close cycles, prior art sleeves experience an unacceptable percentage of failed pressure tests. The failed pressure tests are indicative that the sleeve has failed to seal the ports, and may be locked in either the open position or the closed position. Further, the failed pressure tests may be indicative that seals, which normally prevent leakage through the ports particularly in the closed position, may have been damaging during shifting of the sleeve, such as by shifting over debris, may have been eroded as a result of fluid flow within the tool and through the ports, or both.
Sleeve locations and functioning failures significantly impact service reliability, such as during a wellbore fracturing operation. For at least this reason, there is great interest in developing sleeves that are reliably located, that reliably seal, that reliably open and/or close and that remain locked in position until functioned to shift.
Embodiments taught herein utilize co-operating uphole and downhole annular stops and shoulders acting between housing and a sleeve shiftable axially therein to delimit the shifting of the sleeve between uphole and downhole positions for closing and opening ports in the housing. The stops and shoulders are isolated from a housing bore and a sleeve bore. Locating tools, which are run downhole through the housing bore and sleeve bore and are pulled uphole in the sleeve bore to locate, engage in a locating profile in the sleeve for positively locating the tool in the sleeve. Unlike the prior art sleeves, which position the delimiting stops in the bore of the housing, the locating tool cannot engage unintendedly with the annular stops, falsely indicating location of the tool within the sleeve. Thus, in embodiments, the sleeve is positively located.
In embodiments, the locating tool is also used to shift the sleeve and may be conveyed on a treatment tool, such as a frac tool.
In one broad aspect, a sleeve assembly comprises a tubular sleeve housing having a housing bore formed therethrough, the housing having one or more ports formed therethrough; and a shifting profile formed in an inner surface of the housing, the shifting profile having an uphole shoulder and a downhole shoulder. An axially shiftable tubular sleeve is housed within the bore of the sleeve housing and forms a sleeve annulus therebetween. The sleeve has a bore formed therethrough. A locating profile is formed in an interior of the sleeve, adapted for engaging a shifting locator therein. Annular uphole and downhole stops formed on an exterior of the sleeve and extending into the sleeve annulus for engaging the uphole and downhole shoulders of the shifting profile delimit axial movement of the sleeve between a closed position, wherein the sleeve blocks the ports, and an open position, wherein the sleeve is shifted axially away from the ports.
In another broad aspect, a method for positively locating a locating profile in a sleeve, the sleeve being axially moveable within a housing for shifting the sleeve axially therein between uphole and downhole positions, comprises running a locating shifting tool downhole, through a bore of the sleeve, to below a downhole end of the sleeve. The locating shifting tool is pulled uphole, the locating shifting tool being guided uphole past the downhole end of the sleeve by a downhole sleeve ramp formed thereon. The locating shifting tool is continued to be pulled uphole to engage at an uphole stop in the locating profile. The locating shifting tool and sleeve engaged therewith is axially moved between the uphole and downhole positions, wherein uphole and downhole stops in an annulus between the sleeve and the housing engage uphole and downhole shoulders therein, the annular stops and annular shoulders acting between the sleeve and the housing to delimit the axial movement of the sleeve.
Unlike prior art sleeves which limit the travel or shift distance of the sleeve to be shorter in length than the locating profile to minimize engaging the locating tool above or below the sleeve, the annular delimiting stops and shoulders permit an increase in the travel distance of the sleeve. The increased travel distance allows a greater length of sealing interface between the sleeve and the housing for more reliable sealing capability. Further, spacing the uphole end of the sleeve further away from ports in the housing when the sleeve is in the open position improves erosion resistance.
Ramps formed at the uphole and downhole ends of the sleeve and the housing, guide the locating tool into and out of the housing bore and the sleeve bore. Thus, the locating tool does not engage in gaps formed above and below the sleeve and provide a false indication the tool is located in the sleeve. Instead the locating tool engages only within the locating profile and indications at surface can be relied on to positively indicate location of the tool within the sleeve.
The ramps further act, particularly on a low side of a horizontal wellbore to displace debris into the bore and away from ends of the sleeve and housing as the sleeve ramps converge toward the housing ramps as the sleeve is shifted axially between uphole and downhole positions. Removal of debris between the sleeve and the housing allows the sleeve to shift fully to the uphole and downhole positions and increases the reliability of locking mechanisms, such as detents, which act between the sleeve and the housing to hold the sleeve in uphole and downhole positions until functioned to shift therefrom. Removal of debris also minimizes damage to seals which might otherwise occur as the sleeve and seals are shifted thereover.
As shown in
Uphole and downhole internal delimiting shoulders 22,24, such as adjacent an uphole end 26 and a downhole end 28 of the housing 12, protrude radially inwardly into the housing bore 14 and engage uphole 30 and downhole ends 32 of the sleeve 16, respectively. Thus, the distance the sleeve 16 can shift axially in the housing 12 between the open and closed positions is delimited.
Sleeves 16 in the completion string 11 are generally located using a location tool. Prior art sleeves 16 are known to be located using a location tool that engages an uphole stop 33 within a locating cavity or profile 34 in the sleeve bore 18.
Having reference to
Dogs 36, supported on radially outwardly biased dog arms 38 on the treatment tool 40, run into the completion string, such as on coiled tubing (CT), and through the bores 18 of the sleeves 16, engage the uphole stop 33 within the locating profile 34 when pulled uphole to locate. The dogs 36 have uphole and downhole interfaces 42 which are urged radially outwardly into engagement with the locating profile 34. The dogs 36 are urged radially outwardly as an axially manipulated activation mandrel 35, connected to an axially indexing J-slot mechanism (
The prior art sleeves, shown in
As can be best seen in
In normal operation, a leak path P to the reservoir R is created, such as when shear screws 60 engaging the sleeve 16 to the housing 12 during installation and running into the completion string 11 are sheared to allow the sleeve 16 to shift for the first time. Additional leak paths may be present between unsealed areas of an annulus 17 between sleeve 16 and components of the housing 12. In both cases, fluid F under pressure will flow, such as from a tool run into the bore 18, through the leak paths P and to the reservoir R.
If the uphole seal 52, typically an “O” ring seal, is damaged, there is a short period of time between when the sleeve 16 starts to shift to the open position and when the sleeve 16 engages the downhole internal delimiting shoulder 24 in the open position wherein fluid can enter the annulus 17. If this occurs, debris can get into the annulus 17 between the sleeve 16 and the housing 12.
If the downhole “O” ring seal 58 on the sleeve 16 in the prior art sleeve assemblies 10 is damaged when opening the sleeve 16 for the first time, there is a direct leak path P to a set screw, such as is used for filling the annulus 17 with damping grease, to threads securing an uphole section 13 of the housing 12 to a barrel section 15 thereof and to the potentially damaged uphole sleeve seal 52.
If the uphole and downhole seals 52, 58 on the exterior of the sleeve 16 fail, pressure will be allowed into the annulus 17 during the frac treatment. More importantly, if both of the uphole and downhole “O” ring seals 52, 58 are damaged, the sleeve 16 in the prior art sleeve assemblies 10 will not reseal when closed and pressure/fluid will leak to the reservoir R.
Debris D built up at or about the uphole and downhole delimiting shoulders 22,24 may prevent the sleeve 16 from shifting to the fully open and/or closed position. When the sleeve 16 is unable to shift to the fully open or closed positions, uphole and downhole locking arrangements 56, such as detents or the like, located in the annulus 17 and acting between the sleeve and the housing to hold the sleeve 16 in the open or closed position, may not fully engage. As a result, the prior art sleeve 16 cannot reliably remain in the intended open or closed position.
In the prior art sleeve assemblies 10, erosion is highly likely. After fracturing thousands of stages in wellbores, Applicant has observed severe erosion on frac tools when removed from the wellbore after a fracturing operation. It is highly suspected that similar erosion of the prior art sleeves assemblies 10 in the completion string 11 has occurred as well, particularly as the prior art sleeve assemblies 10 appear not to re-seal reliably, as evidenced by pressure testing. Thus, the prior art sleeve assemblies 10 may be unable to maintain successful continuous operation in the field.
As will be appreciated, turbulent flow or channel laminar flow of fluids F about the ports 20 and at least the uphole end 30 of the sleeve 16 during a fracturing operation may result in a wash out area on the internal diameter of the housing 12 or the sealing interface 50, adjacent or about the ports 20. Wash out typically prevents the uphole sleeve seal 52, from sealing at the sealing interface 50 after the fracturing operation is complete.
With the sleeve 16 shifted to the open position as shown in
A downhole sleeve seal 58, such as an “O” ring seal, on the exterior surface 54 of the sleeve 16 or in the housing 12 adjacent the downhole end 32 of the sleeve 16 may also be exposed to debris D, particularly when the sleeve 16 is shifted to the open position for the first time. As is understood generally, seals can be damaged if forced over debris under pressure. Damage to the downhole sleeve seal 58 as a result causes the downhole seal 58 to leak, especially when the sleeve 16 is shifted again to the closed position.
When the downhole seal 58 is damaged by debris, as discussed above, pressure can travel into the annulus 17 between the sleeve 16 and the housing 12 and through the leak paths P to reservoirs R having lower pressure than the wellbore, similar to a thief zone or the like.
As shown in
Further, other tools such as cement wiper plugs and the like, that extend outwardly enough to engage or catch within the prior art sleeve assemblies 10 are at risk of damage when run-in-hole (RIH) or pulled-out-of-hole (POOH). In the case of cement wiper plugs, it is thought that fins on the wiper plug become less effective in cleaning the cement from the wellbore as the wiper plug passes thru and engages the uphole and downhole delimiting shoulders 22,24 of a plurality of the prior art sleeve assemblies 10, located at the plurality of stages within the wellbore.
As noted above, sleeves which are shiftable using a locating shifting tool, as taught in Applicant's US published application US2017-0058644-A1, are known. While not limited thereto, embodiments are described herein in the context of a sleeve assembly 100 wherein the sleeve 16 is located and shifted using a locating shifting tool incorporated in a treatment tool 40.
Having reference to
In embodiments, the annular uphole and downhole delimiting stops 102, 104 are formed at uphole 101 and downhole 103 ends of a radially outwardly extending profile 105, formed intermediate the exterior sleeve surface 54.
The annular uphole and downhole delimiting stops 102,104 engage within an annular shifting profile 106 formed on an interior surface 108 of the housing 12. The annular shifting profile 106 has uphole 107 and downhole 109 annular shoulders formed in the housing 12 at uphole and downhole ends of the annular shifting profile 106. As shown in
As the annular shifting profile 106 is located in the annulus 17, the locating shifting tool 36 on the treatment tool 40, travelling within the sleeve bore 18, cannot engage within the shifting profile 106. Thus, the shift length L1, defined by the uphole and downhole annular shoulders 107,109, is no longer limited in length and can be at least equal to or greater than the locating length L2.
Further, as shown in
Further still, in embodiments taught herein, because there is no longer a limit to the shift length L1 within the sleeve assembly 100, the sealing length L3 of the sealing interface 50 being increased to at least that of the shift length L1 to improve the reliability of sealing of a plurality of the uphole sleeve seals 52 thereat. Increasing the length of the sealing interface 50 allows for a greater number of uphole sleeve seals 52, such as “O” ring seals. Should one or more of the plurality of uphole sleeve seals 52 or the sealing interface 50 closest to the ports 20 be damaged due to fluid flow thereat, the redundancy created by the plurality of the uphole sleeve seals 52 acts to maintain the ability to reliably seal or re-seal after shifting the sleeve 16 to the open or closed positions for fracturing, without compromising the frac operation.
Further, additional downhole sleeve seals 58 on the exterior surface 40 of the sleeve 16 or in the housing 12 adjacent the downhole end 32 of the sleeve 16 are added to provide redundancy in case one or more downhole sleeve seals 58, adjacent the downhole end of the sleeve 16, are damaged as a result of debris D, particularly when the sleeve 16 is shifted the first time.
In embodiments taught herein, the uphole end 26 of the housing 12 and the uphole end 30 of the internal sleeve 16 are bevelled to form opposing ramps: an uphole housing ramp 114 and an uphole sleeve ramp 116. Similarly, the downhole end 28 of the housing 12 and the downhole end 32 of the internal sleeve 16 are bevelled to form opposing ramps: a downhole housing ramp 118 and a downhole sleeve ramp 120. The uphole and downhole ends 26, 28 of the housing 12 are bevelled outwardly, increasing a diameter of the housing bore 14 as the housing 12 approaches the uphole and downhole ends 30,32 of the sleeve 16 and forming the uphole and downhole housing ramps 114, 118. The uphole and downhole ends 30,32 of the sleeve 16 are bevelled outwardly, increasing a diameter of the sleeve bore 18 at uphole and downhole ends 30,32 of the uphole and downhole sleeve ramps 116,120.
The opposing uphole and downhole ramps 114,116,118,120 are not intended to act to delimit shifting of the sleeve 16 as the ramps 114,116,118,120 would “mash” together. Instead the ramps 114,116,118,120 are used to aid in minimizing or eliminating the risk of the dogs 36 engaging within any portion of the sleeve 16 except the intended locating profile 34 therein, as the sleeve 16 is shifted axially therein between the open and closed positions. The locating shifting tool 36, expanded into the housing bore 14 above the sleeve 16, when the sleeve 16 is in the open position, or below the sleeve 16 when the sleeve 16 is in the closed position, is guided into and out of the sleeve bore 18 by the bevelled uphole and downhole ramps 114,116,118,120 and thus, do not engage, other than in the locating profile 34 and cannot falsely locate the position of the sleeve 16.
With respect to debris handling, in embodiments taught herein the uphole and downhole ramps 114,116,118,120 act, primarily on a low side of a directional wellbore, to displace debris D into the sleeve and/or housing bore 18,14 away from ends of the sleeve 16 when the uphole or downhole sleeve ramps 116,120 converge on the uphole or downhole housing ramps 114,118, as the sleeve 16 is shifted between the open closed and open positions. Thus, in embodiments of the sleeve assemblies 100 taught herein debris D does not pack about the ramps and the sleeve 16 is more reliably shifted fully to the open and closed positions
The uphole and downhole ramps 114,116,118,120 also contribute by removing debris from in front of the plurality of uphole sleeve seals 52 and the one or more downhole seals 58, making the seals 52, 58 less susceptible to damage when the sleeve 16 travels axially back and forth during opening and closing of the ports 20.
As best seen in
Embodiments of the sleeve assemblies 100 as taught herein and shown in
In embodiments, hard wiper material may be installed on a leading edge of the “O” ring seals 52, 58 to keep debris D away from the “O” ring seals 52, 58. Thus, debris damage to the seals 52, 58 is at least minimized. In embodiments, wiper seals (not shown) are installed on all leading edges of the seals 52, 58 that may be exposed to debris D during movement of the sleeve 16 to both the open and closed positions.
In contrast to the prior art sleeve assemblies, in embodiments of the sleeve assemblies 100 taught herein, the longer sealing interface 50 area as well as the increased number of uphole sleeve seals 52 to seal thereagainst results in improved sealing and re-sealing when the sleeves 16 are closed after fracturing despite some erosion, as is evidenced by straight line pressure test results. Using embodiments taught herein, downtime as a result of failures to properly seal are minimized and may be eliminated.
Further, as a result of the unlimited travel distance of the sleeve 16, in embodiments the uphole end 30 of the sleeve 16 can be spaced further away from the frac ports 20. Increasing the distance the uphole end 30 is spaced from the ports 20 increases the likelihood that the uphole end 30 of the sleeve 16 will not wash out and that the uphole sleeve seals 52 are protected. Increasing an axial travel distance of the sleeve 16 away from the frac ports 20 in the open position also increases the probability that the uphole sleeve seals 52 are not washed out by the frac treatment.
In the case of embodiments of the sleeve assemblies 100 taught herein, removing the prior art limitation on the shift length L1, which permits the extended sealing interface 50 and the greater number of uphole sleeve seals 52, positioning of the annular delimiting stops 102, 104 and shoulders 107,109 in the annulus 17 between the housing 12 and the sleeve 16, and displacement and removal of debris D as a result of the opposing uphole and downhole ramps 114,116,118,120, greatly improve sleeve performance.
Having reference to
Having reference to
In yet another embodiment, a jar tool is provided, such as above the treatment tool 40. The locating shifting tool 36 on the treatment tool 40 are first engaged with the locating profile 34 and conveyance tubing/coiled tubing weight is used to actuate the jar tool to release the sleeve 16, either uphole or downhole and enable sleeve shifting. Mechanical movement of the conveyance tubing actuates the sleeve 16.
In yet another embodiment, each sleeve 16 is fit to the sleeve housing 12 with a primary hydraulic chamber filled with an incompressible fluid, such as an oil, hydraulic fluid or grease. An orifice is provided to provide an outlet for the fluid from the primary chamber. The locating shifting tool 36 is set to the sleeve's locating profile 34 and a persistent force, uphole or downhole, is applied to the sleeve 16 to displace the fluid from the primary chamber over time to enable free axial shifting movement thereafter. In an embodiment, the hydraulic fluid moves from the primary chamber and into the sleeve bore 18 or the wellbore annulus. In another embodiment, the fluid can move between the primary chamber to a secondary and larger chamber, formed in the annulus 17 between the sleeve housing 12 and sleeve 16, moving fluid from one end of the sleeve 16 to the other.
Embodiments of sleeve assemblies 100 taught herein are generally actuated in accordance with Applicant's co-pending US published application US2017-0058644-A1, incorporated herein by reference in its entirety. The sleeves 16 may be activated in any sequence in the wellbore, from heel to toe, or toe to heel or alternatively, can be individually actuated in any sequence as desired.
Having reference to
Positive location is a significant departure from conventional sleeve tools. The movement of a tool is often many kilometers downhole, and the coiled tubing string mechanics associated therewith are significant.
Positive sleeve location is an important factor in objectives to minimize sleeve length and cost. Without positive dog-to-sleeve indication, optimizing the shortest sleeve possible is difficult if not impossible, as there simply is not enough room for axial placement errors, including setting high or too low. On uphole movement during locating from sleeve 16 to sleeve 16, the dogs 36 are guided through the housing and sleeve bores 14, 18 by the ramps 114, 116, 118, 120 on the housing 12 and sleeve 16 and therefore do not engage any annular recess other than the sleeve's locating profile 34, and once engaged, there is no accidental movement to permit one to pull past the uphole stop 33 and out of the locating profile 34, the dogs 36 being locked in the locating profile 34, unless emergency release tactics are required.
With the dogs 36 engaged in the locating profile 34, only extraordinary efforts will permit the tool 40 to move, transitioning from locating to shifting the sleeve 16. If there was a tool failure, the dogs 36 may be released from the locating profile 34 by cycling the tool 40 or pulling extreme loads on the tool 40 to force the dogs 36 into collapse.
As the dogs 36 move uphole from the casing 11 to the sleeve 16, the dogs 36 are designed not to locate in any gap at the bottom of the sleeve 16 when the sleeve 16 is closed. The dogs 36 engage the locating profile 34 as discussed above preventing the tool 40 from traveling further uphole and providing positive indication at surface, for example about 5,000 to about 10,000 daN, that the sleeve 16 has been located.
To lock the dogs 36 into the locating profile 34, the J-slot is cycled to a “run-in-hole (RIH) position”. During this transition, the tool 40 is held in position by drag blocks while the inner activation mandrel 35 travels downhole, also moving an annular restraining ring about the dogs 36 to its downhole-most position adjacent a pivot, maximizing the dog arm movement. Similarly the cone 37 moves with the activation mandrel 35 downhole to approach the dogs 36. The radially outward biasing of the dogs 36 with the compressed spring 39 is locked with the ramped face of the cone 37 and dog 36 engagement. The cone 37 mechanically forces the dogs 36 outwards.
If it's required, the sleeve 16 can be shifted down with coiled tubing force from surface and/or fluid pressure above the tool 40. With reference to
Herein, having reference again to
Further, a sleeve shift dampening system can be provided as taught in Applicant's U.S. Pat. No. 9,840,888, incorporated herein by reference, to control the acceleration of the sleeve 16 and the shock load when the sleeve 16 reaches the downhole position. By minimizing the shock load, tool longevity is greatly increased and a fluid hammer shock load to the open formation is contained so as not to exceed frac breakdown pressures of the formation.
Opening of the sleeve 16 is indicated at surface by a reduction in coiled tubing string weight. This is important in the event of troubleshooting problems related to breaking down the formation for example, because it eliminates the concern of sleeve malfunction. Again, having the annular uphole and downhole delimiting stops 102.104 and the specific locating profile 34 in the sleeve 16 also eliminates high or low setting of the tool 40, which further minimizes troubleshooting formation breakdown.
Pull or push loads to close and re-open the sleeve 16, after the initial opening of the sleeve 16, are generally controlled by the annular uphole and downhole locking arrangements or detents 56. For example, a detent release load is typically set to 5,000 to 10,000 daN.
After treatment, one can choose to close the sleeve 16 and move the tool 40 to the next zone of interest. In the downhole-shift-to-open embodiment, closing the sleeve 16 can be achieved with an overpull sufficient to overcome the downhole detent 112. Depending on the detent design threshold, the detent 56 can be overcome by over-pulling the coiled tubing string weight beyond a threshold, such as over about 5,000 daN. A typical range is between about 5000 daN to about 10,000 daN, or even above about 10,000 daN to upwards of about 15,000 daN. In embodiments, maximum upper thresholds are in the order of about 13,000 to about 15,000 daN.
When the sleeve 16 is first opened, the downhole detent 112, such as an annular lip about the sleeve 16 at the downhole end of the sleeve 16, is engaged in a corresponding annular detent, ratchet or receiver on the housing 12 to retain the sleeve 16 in the open position until purposefully actuated to the closed position. The tool 40 can be cycled uphole by overcoming the downhole detent 112 and thereafter cycled downhole again at some later time. Cycling uphole either enables J-Slot transition to the next stage, or confirms the sleeve 16 was engaged. Cycling downhole thereafter transitions to the next stage.
One can cycle the tool 40 uphole, at a weight indicated at less than a threshold if it is desired to leave the sleeve 16 open, and thereafter be cycled downhole. Alternately, one can cycle the tool 40 uphole, at a weight indicated greater than a threshold to overcome the downhole detent 112 to close the sleeve 16, and only then cycle the tool 40 down.
Thus, upon completion of the frac, the sleeve 16 may be closed or left open. Thereafter, the coiled tubing is cycled downhole to release the cone 37 from the dogs 36, and the J-Slot mechanism is cycled to the “M2 position” (
During uphole movement for closing the sleeve 16, the inner activation mandrel 35 starts to move uphole, opening a bypass valve and tension release of an annular packer seal. The pressure across the tool 40 is equalized and debris D is flushed from the tool 40. The cone 37 disengages from under the dogs 36 and the inner activation mandrel 35 transitions from locked dogs 36 to spring biased or supported dogs 36. During this transition, the dogs 36 cannot move in the sleeve 16 as the dogs 36 are still engaged with the locating profile 34. The dogs 36 travel axially within the locating profile 34.
When the dogs 36 engage an uphole end of the locating profile 34, a net weight indication is indicated at surface. The weight indication can be set to any loading or threshold, in this case from about 5,000 to about 15,000 daN over coiled tubing string weight. This weight range is an example of a range selected to have a loading significant enough to be realized and observable at surface. Surface weight indication for locating the sleeve, shifting it open and shifting it closed is useful with regards to operational confidence and optimizing operations at surface.
The purpose of closing the sleeve 16 right after the frac includes isolation of the frac treatment in the reservoir by not allowing it to flow back into the well. By isolating the frac treatment the formation is allowed to heal, containing the frac sand and reducing sand production in the well, which ultimately would have to be recovered at some expense. A further purpose includes isolation of the frac treatment from other previously frac'd sleeves/stages to prevent cross flow in the well. Further still closing the sleeve 16 minimizes the amount of clean fluid required to clean the tools 40 travelling to the next stage.
The sleeves 16 may be re-opened at any time. For example, if a well is frac'd from the toe to the heel, once the last sleeve 16 is closed at the heel, the coiled tubing can travel back to the toe and the process of locating and opening all the sleeves 16 can proceed stage to stage back to the heel. The sleeves 16 can be opened days or weeks or months later as another option. Generally, these time periods are reservoir and area specific. Further, in embodiments, only select sleeves 16 are opened or closed as desired to control fluid flow.
When the sleeve 16 shifts from the open to the closed position, the sleeve 16 is dampened in reverse and the shock load of the closing action is transferred to surface through indication, by way of a coiled tubing string weight loss.
Further, when the sleeve 16 is closed, the coiled tubing may be over-pulled, for example, at weight greater than about 10,000 daN, which is observable at surface to confirm closure. In most cases however, this is not necessary.
When the sleeve 16 is closed, the well at that zone is isolated. The tool dogs 36 are released from the sleeve 16 by RIH with the coiled tubing, shifting the J-Slot to the M2 position. The inner activation mandrel 35 travels downhole to a “dog release position” in the J-Slot mechanism. An annular retainer ring forces the dogs' arms 38 to the radially withdrawn position. The outer J-Slot housing is restrained by the drag block and the inner activation mandrel 35 cycles the J-slot mechanism to a “release position”. Once the mandrel 35 travel sufficiently downhole, arm cam's are forced by the retainer ring to collapse the dogs 36 from the locating profile 34, the dogs 36 are unlocked from the sleeve 16 and the tool 40 is free to travel downhole.
Leaving the sleeve 16 open may be accomplished in a couple of ways. A first method is not to exceed the net weight required to overcome the downhole detent 56, such as string weight load plus about 5000 daN, when confirming the engagement of the tool 40 with the locating profile 34 sleeve. If the detent 56 releasing load in the sleeve 16 is not exceeded, the sleeve 16 will not shift. Verification that the sleeve 16 has not shifted is seen as a lack of a weight loss at surface when pulling up on the coiled tubing. As in closing the sleeve 16, the tool 40 is thereafter cycled as described above for unlocking the dogs 36.
After pulling the coiled tubing uphole to a load less than the about 5,000 daN over coiled tubing string load, the operator causes the tool 40 to travel downhole with the coiled tubing. The tool 40 again transitions from dogs 36 being forced outwardly to forcing the dogs inwardly via the retainer ring acting on the arm cams surface. Once the retainer ring forces the dogs 36 to the collapsed position, the tool 40 can travel downhole.
Another method of leaving the sleeve 16 open after the frac or stimulation treatment is to provide an alternate J-Slot pattern so that the sequence to optionally close the sleeve 16 is eliminated. Rather than an uphole path to the “extreme uphole position” (U), the J-slot could terminate at an “intermediate M1 position” for POOH. This would allow the tool 40 to be pulled out of the sleeve 16 without having to travel down to release the tool 40. The J-Slot mechanism may have various configurations and sequence patterns to provide a means to change several of the operating parameters of the tool.
With the tool 40 released from sleeve 16, whether leaving the sleeve 16 open or closed, the tool 40 is run-in-hole (RIH), the tool 40 travelling downhole with all of the dogs 36 retracted. Running the tool 40 strictly shifted to the RIH mode, configures the tool 40 as a slick line tool where no engagement with the sleeves 16 or casing collars is indicated, unless the stacked beam drag block assembly is set up with a backup location dog for the sleeve 16.
After RIH to free the tool 40 from the sleeve 16, the coiled tubing direction is reversed to move uphole for relocation or POOH.
This application claims the benefit of each of U.S. Provisional Patent Application Ser. No. 62/571,591, filed on Oct. 12, 2017, U.S. Provisional Patent Application Ser. No. 62/577,025, filed on Oct. 25, 2017 and U.S. Provisional Patent Application Ser. No. 62/619,667, filed on Jan. 19, 2018, the entirety of each of which is incorporated herein by reference.
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
62571591 | Oct 2017 | US | |
62577025 | Oct 2017 | US | |
62619667 | Jan 2018 | US |