The invention relates to the field of RF power detectors and controllers, and in particular to RF power detectors and controllers used in mobile handset terminals for wireless applications.
The demand for greater bandwidth for mobile systems in a highly competitive landscape has forced network providers to look for low cost ways to expand existing networks. One such system that is being used is Enhanced Data Rate for Global Evolution (EDGE). The EDGE system enables the providers to expand the existing Global System for Mobile Communications (GSM) system, the standard for 70% of the worldwide market, to offer bandwidths of up to 300 kbps. This bandwidth and capacity extension can be accomplished with a relatively small upgrade to the existing infrastructure network. The system, however, does present some technical challenges. One of these is accurate power control in the transmitter section in the handset terminals.
Accurate power control is required by many RF wireless communications standards, such as GSM, CDMA, EDGE, as disclosed, for example, in U.S. Published Patent Application No. 2003/0139153 (the disclosure of which is hereby incorporated by reference), etc. This necessarily accurate power control may be difficult to implement or achieve using open loop techniques because of variations in the gains of various components due to temperature variations, frequency dependences, power supply variations, and manufacturing tolerances. It may be expensive or impossible to calibrate for all these variables during manufacture. Closed loop control of the power or amplitude of the signal is desirable for these reasons.
Closed Loop power control for Non-Constant Envelope (NCE) modulated signals, such as CDMA or EDGE however, is complicated by the fact that the instantaneous amplitude of the signal varies during transmission. Conventional systems for constant envelope modulation waveforms may compare the measured output power level to a ramp (or power profile) signal in a feedback loop. Applying this technique to non-constant waveforms, which have amplitude variations, has the effect of wiping off the desired amplitude information these signals, creating unacceptable distortion of the modulated waveform. This technique is therefore unsuitable for NCE signals.
Closed loop power or amplitude control of NCE waveforms may be accomplished by means of a gain measurement, where a priori power level information of a modulated reference signal is used and compared with a measurement of the power level of the final output signal. This a priori information provides the necessary information regarding the amplitude variations of the original modulated signal for the feedback scheme to work properly. This method of closed loop feedback however, may be sensitive to variations in the average input power applied to the reference signal input. In many applications, the reference signal average power will exhibit these variations due to a number of factors, such as temperature, frequency and part-to-part variations, making this technique unsuitable.
There is a need, therefore, for an efficient and economical system for providing closed loop power control.
The invention provides a radio frequency output power control system for use in communication systems. The power control system is used for a modulation scheme having a non-constant amplitude envelope and comprises a power amplifier having a power amplifier input for receiving an input signal with a non-constant amplitude envelope, a power control input for receiving a power control input, and a power amplifier output for providing an amplified output signal. The power control system also includes a track and hold circuit for tracking a measured reference power signal that is representative of a modulation of the input signal, and subtraction means for subtracting an output of the track and hold circuit from the measured reference power signal to provide a difference signal that is coupled to the power control input in accordance with an embodiment of the invention.
The following description may be further understood with reference to the accompanying drawings in which:
The drawings are shown for illustrative purposes only.
In accordance with various embodiments of the invention, a reference signal may be used to provide information regarding a desired power level of the output signal. The reference signal may be a modulated signal that has, for example, a frequency that is the same as the transmitted frequency or may use an intermediate frequency (IF) as the reference signal. The reference signal provides envelope information regarding the desired power level of the output signal, and this information is critical for this system. A further embodiment of the invention involves using the baseband I and Q signals as the reference signal.
The system incorporates a track-and-hold circuit in a power control system to accomplish closed loop power control that is insensitive to variations in the reference signal that are not a consequence of the intended modulation of the reference signal. As shown in
Initially, the track-and-hold unit 26 tracks the measured reference power signal. The track-and-hold unit output is subtracted from the measured reference power signal, canceling out the influence of the measured reference power signal on the error signal. This causes the error signal to correspond solely to the difference between the ramp signal and the measured output power signal, and not the gain of the power amplifier or the reference signal power. When the track-and-hold unit is tracking, this system behaves identically to some GSM GMSK type closed loop power control systems.
The track-and-hold unit is switched to hold mode prior to beginning of the power ramp, holding the measured reference power level at the switching instant. During the hold time, the difference between the reference detector output and the track-and-hold output corresponds to the instantaneous envelope variations in the reference signal relative to the power level at the hold instant. These instantaneous variations are compared with the detected output power, and the control loop ensures that the output signal envelope variations track any instantaneous envelope variations on the reference signal, within the bandwidth of the feedback loop.
The power ramp signal is summed at the integrator input. In addition to any amplitude variations present on the output signal due to the non-constant envelope modulation of the reference signal, the feedback loop imposes additional amplitude variations to the output signal corresponding to the ramp signal.
Applying the difference between the instantaneous measured reference signal level to the measured reference signal level at a point in time corresponding to its average ensures that the feedback loop sets output power level independently of the average reference signal level. The output power, instead, becomes a function of the power detector characteristics, the instantaneous reference envelope variation, and the power ramp signal.
In accordance with another embodiment, a system that uses a modulated IF signal for the reference information is shown in
In addition to providing power control, this circuit can provide linearization of the power amplifier. If the power amplifier gain varies due to compression or thermal effects while the system is in the hold mode this circuit can correct for the gain variations in the power amplifier. To do this, it is necessary that the control loop bandwidth exceed the modulation bandwidth of the reference signal. If it is not necessary to correct for gain variations in the power amplifier, then it is not necessary that the control loop bandwidth exceed the modulation bandwidth and the control loop bandwidth need only exceed the bandwidth of the ramp signal.
This invention may be useful for multimode transmitters involving constant and non-constant envelope signals, such as GSM (constant-envelope) and EDGE (non-constant envelope). In this situation, the track-and-hold circuit is kept in track mode for any GSM burst, giving a circuit which is equivalent to a conventional GMSK closed loop power controller. For any EDGE burst, the track-and-hold circuit is switched to hold in the manner previously discussed.
The above systems differ from other RF power control methods in that they use a track-and-hold function to track and hold a measurement signal corresponding to the power level of a reference NCE modulation signal. The track-and-hold circuit enables the systems to perform closed loop power control in a manner that is insensitive to variations in the reference signal, when these variations are not a consequence of the intended modulation. Such systems should also be robust and relatively easy to implement.
In further embodiments, the baseband I and Q signals may be used for the reference information. In many conventional radio transmitters, these i(t) and q(t) signals are generated by means of digital baseband processors. By various means, the carrier signal is modulated with these I and Q baseband signals. The instantaneous power level of the modulated signal will be a function of these I and Q baseband signals. A modulated waveform may be described with an equation of the form:
S(t)=i(t)cos ωct+q(t)sin ωct
The power level therefore, of the reference signal may be determined using the baseband signals instead of a modulated signal at some carrier frequency. As shown in
Using baseband signals permits computation of the reference power level in the digital domain. Digital computation of the reference power may be more efficient than analog computation. This efficiency may be in terms of circuitry, size, power consumption, and other considerations. Determination of the reference power level may be done more accurately using the baseband signals instead of modulated carrier signals. This is due to imperfections in the modulation process.
Those skilled in the art will appreciate that numerous modifications and variations may be made to the above disclosed embodiments without departing from the spirit and scope of the invention.
The present application claims priority to U.S. Provisional Patent Application Ser. No. 60/454,032 filed Mar. 12, 2003.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
5054116 | Davidson | Oct 1991 | A |
5196806 | Ichihara | Mar 1993 | A |
5379346 | Pecora et al. | Jan 1995 | A |
5507016 | Okuhara | Apr 1996 | A |
5656929 | Humpherys | Aug 1997 | A |
5737697 | Yamada | Apr 1998 | A |
5802451 | Adachi et al. | Sep 1998 | A |
5834979 | Yatsuka | Nov 1998 | A |
6091296 | Rha | Jul 2000 | A |
6212367 | Tolson | Apr 2001 | B1 |
6240144 | Ha | May 2001 | B1 |
6452446 | Eisenberg et al. | Sep 2002 | B1 |
6566944 | Pehlke et al. | May 2003 | B1 |
6580901 | Mochizuki | Jun 2003 | B1 |
6617930 | Nitta | Sep 2003 | B2 |
6795712 | Vakilian et al. | Sep 2004 | B1 |
20030092407 | Nitta | May 2003 | A1 |
20030139153 | McMorrow et al. | Jul 2003 | A1 |
20040166802 | McKay et al. | Aug 2004 | A1 |
20060111060 | Kuriyama et al. | May 2006 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
0654899 | May 1995 | EP |
1276232 | Jan 2003 | EP |
05-22159 | Jan 1993 | JP |
06-53919 | Feb 1994 | JP |
06-177680 | Jun 1994 | JP |
06177680 | Jun 1994 | JP |
09199963 | Jul 1997 | JP |
WO 9705697 | Feb 1997 | WO |
WO 0103292 | Jan 2001 | WO |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20040235437 A1 | Nov 2004 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
60454032 | Mar 2003 | US |