The present invention relates to systems and methods for enhancing reagent flow on slides for tissue slide staining, more particularly to a closed-system flow cell system that allows for enhanced passive mixing of reagents on a slide. The flow cell system may also provide temperature control through preheating reagents.
Automated tissue slide staining machines often utilize methods and systems (e.g., open systems) for depositing amounts of reagents on the top surface of a slide. Typically, molecular diffusion is relied upon to allow the reagents to flow across the slide surface appropriately. A major disadvantage attendant to such “open systems” is that the diffusion process can be slow, which in turn may result in low staining rates of the slide components (e.g., tissue or cells). Also, in such “open systems” the reagents are exposed to air (and possibly high temperatures), resulting in excessive reagent evaporation, which may ultimately result in the drying of the slide components, e.g., tissue. While the reagent(s) could be replenished in order to help prevent slide drying, this increases reagent consumption and thus cost as well as increasing system complexity and run time. In addition, in “open systems”, wicking of the reagents, e.g., to a different side of the slide, may have negative effects on the stain quality. Reaction covers (e.g., cover tiles) may be used atop the slide components (e.g., tissue) to help create an environment less prone to reagent evaporation and to help enhance reagent flow. However, reaction covers may obscure the view of the slide (and tissues and components).
The present invention is based, in part, on the surprising discovery of a closed-system flow cell system (FCS) that would find use in enhanced passive mixing of reagents on a slide. In one embodiment, the flow cell system (FCS) comprises an encasement that provides a channel or reservoir for reagents to contact the tissue on the slide. At least a portion of the encasement (e.g., a portion within the encasement that contacts the reagents in the channel) comprises a groove pattern, e.g., a herringbone groove pattern. The pattern can be constructed to create a chaotic flow profile, even under laminar flow regime (e.g., the Reynolds number (Re)—a quantity that is used to help predict flow patterns in fluid flow systems—of liquid flow in the system would normally be low, such that chaotic mixing would not occur without the pattern). The closed system of the flow cell can, in particular embodiments, enhance fluid mixing and prevent reagent evaporation and drying of the tissue. Further, the system of the present invention will also enable a clear view of the slide (e.g., tissue on the slide), if desired.
In an exemplary embodiment, the present invention features a closed-system flow cell system. In some embodiments, the system comprises an encasement with an inner cavity adapted to hold a slide and form a channel atop the slide, wherein the encasement comprises a groove pattern within the channel and the groove pattern provides a chaotic advection regime to fluid within the channel. In some embodiments, the system comprises an encasement and the encasement comprises: a bottom portion with a slide indentation adapted to accept a slide; and a top portion having a flow surface (the flow surface being the surface facing the slide), wherein a channel indentation is disposed in the flow surface and is sunken in a distance as compared to the flow surface, the channel indentation forms a channel, wherein a groove pattern is disposed on at least a portion of the channel indentation, the groove pattern provides a chaotic advection regime to fluid within the channel.
In some embodiments, the system further comprises an inlet fluidly connected to the channel and an outlet fluidly connected to the channel. The outlet may be positioned opposite the inlet. The inlet allows reagents to enter the channel and the outlet allows reagents to exit the channel.
In some embodiments, the system further comprises a perimeter groove disposed in the flow surface surrounding the channel indentation. In some embodiments, an o-ring is disposed in the perimeter groove.
In some embodiments, the groove pattern allows for multiple helical flow cycles over a length of the channel. In some embodiments, the groove pattern comprises a staggered herringbone pattern. In some embodiments, the groove pattern is effective for inducing chaotic stirring, e.g., at a Re from 0 to 100.
In some embodiments, the encasement can be assembled and disassembled to provide access to the slide.
In some embodiments, the channel indentation has a shape with a middle portion that is generally rectangular and two end portions disposed on opposite sides of the middle portion. In some embodiments, the inlet is fluidly connected to an end portion, and the outlet is fluidly connected to the other end portion.
In some embodiments, the bottom portion is constructed such that the slide extends at least a distance above a top surface of the bottom portion.
In some embodiments, the system is hermetically sealed. In some embodiments, the system allows for the introduction of preheated reagents. In some embodiments, the system is constructed from a translucent or transparent material. In some embodiments, the system is constructed to allow a user is able to visualize fluid mixing in the system. In some embodiments, the system allows for controlling a rate of mixing from a mixing index from 0 to 1. In some embodiments, the system allows for achieving flow speeds from 0 to 200 mm/s. In some embodiments, the system further comprises an image capturing system operatively connected to the system, wherein the image capturing system is adapted to visualize flow in the channel. In some embodiments, the image capturing system comprises a light microscope, or a fluorescent microscope.
In some embodiments, the system comprises an automated staining machine.
The present invention also features a system comprising an automated stainer machine and a closed-system flow cell system according to the present invention.
The present invention also features a method (e.g., an automated method) of introducing a chaotic advection regime to fluid in contact with a slide. In some embodiments, the method comprises introducing a reagent into a system of the present invention, wherein the system provides a chaotic advection regime to fluid within the channel in contact with the slide.
The present invention also features an automated slide stainer comprising a system according to the present invention, wherein the slide stainer is capable of performing a method of the present invention.
The present invention also features an automated slide stainer comprising a processor, and a memory coupled to the processor. The memory stores computer-readable instructions that, when executed by the processor, cause the processor to perform operations to perform methods of the present invention. For example, in some embodiments, the operations comprise instructing the slide stainer to introduce a reagent to the channel of the system (e.g., of the encasement).
Any feature or combination of features described herein are included within the scope of the present invention provided that the features included in any such combination are not mutually inconsistent as will be apparent from the context, this specification, and the knowledge of one of ordinary skill in the art. Additional advantages and aspects of the present invention are apparent in the following detailed description and claims.
The following is a list of elements corresponding to a particular element referred to herein:
Unless otherwise explained, all technical and scientific terms used herein have the same meaning as commonly understood by one of ordinary skill in the art to which a disclosed invention belongs. The singular terms “a,” “an,” and “the” include plural referents unless context clearly indicates otherwise. Similarly, the word “or” is intended to include “and” unless the context clearly indicates otherwise. “Comprising” means “including.” Hence “comprising A or B” means “including A” or “including B” or “including A and B.”
All publications, patent applications, patents, and other references mentioned herein are incorporated by reference in their entirety for all purposes. In case of conflict, the present specification, including explanations of terms, will control.
Although methods and materials similar or equivalent to those described herein can be used to practice or test the disclosed technology, suitable methods and materials are described below. The materials, methods, and examples are illustrative only and not intended to be limiting.
Referring now to
Mixing Technologies Comparison
The diminutive scale of flow channels in microfluidic/mini-channel systems increases the surface to volume ratio of the channels, and may therefore be useful for many applications. However, the specific Reynolds number (Re=ρvL/η) of fluid flows in such channels is relatively small. In the system (100) of the present invention, the Reynolds number is of the order of 100 with a characteristic dimension L of 1 mm, a fluid flow rate of 100 mm/s, a fluid density of 1 g/cm3 and a fluid viscosity of 0.001 Ns/m2. In such low Reynolds number regimes, turbulent mixing does not occur, and hence diffusive mixing plays an important role (but is an inherently slow process). Increasing the contact area between the fluid species to be mixed is one of the most efficient means of enhancing the diffusive mixing efficiency. In general, mixing techniques can be categorized as passive mixing and active mixing. Active mixers use the disturbance generated by an external field for the mixing process. Thus, active mixers can be categorized by the types of external disturbance effects such as pressure gradients, temperature, electrohydrodynamics, dielectrophoretics, electrokinetics, magnetohydrodynamics and acoustics. With external fields and the corresponding integrated components, the structures of active mixers may be complicated and require complex fabrication processes. Furthermore, external power sources are needed for the operation of active mixers. Thus, the integration of active mixers in a microfluidic/mini-channel system may be both challenging and expensive. In contrast, passive mixers do not require external energy except those for fluid delivery. In addition, passive structures may be robust, stable in operation, and relatively easily integrated in a more complex system. Passive mixers can be further categorized by the arrangement of the mixed phases: parallel lamination, serial lamination, injection, chaotic advection and droplet formation.
Due to the dominating laminar flow, mixing processes in passive mixing techniques may rely on molecular diffusion and chaotic advection. To improve molecular diffusion, increasing contact surface between the different fluid species and decreasing the diffusion path between them may be required. This may be achieved through the use of a large channel dimension; however, this may require increased reagent consumption. In the present invention, a chaotic advection technique is employed to achieve fluid mixing during the staining process.
Staggered Herringbone Structure
A staggered herringbone structure (SHS) has been demonstrated to be effective in inducing chaotic stirring at low Re (0<Re<100).
The ability to generate transverse flows in channels makes it possible to design steady chaotic flows for use in micro/mini-fluidic systems. A developed mixer based on patterns of slanted grooves on the floor of the channel is shown in
Structures for Enhanced Mixing
The present invention features structures for enhanced mixing. For example, the present invention may comprise herringbone structures (e.g., staggered herringbone structure) along the length (or a portion thereof) of the channel. As previously discussed, the staggered herringbone structure helps to create chaotic advection and enhance mixing in a laminar flow regime. The staggered herringbone design may allow for the completion of multiple helical flow cycles. Without wishing to limit the present invention to any theory or mechanism, it is believed that the more cycles it completes, the better mixing will be. However, size of the system (100) may limit the number of cycles that can be achieved (e.g., in some embodiments, to two cycles, to three cycles, etc.).
The staggered herringbone structure can be used to generate fluid mixing in the system of the present invention. In the system of the present invention, groove patterns are designed in the top of the system flow channel (since the slide with tissue is placed at the bottom of the channel). However, whether placing the staggered herringbone structure on the top or the bottom of the channel, two counter-rotating helical flows will generally be created and will generally lead to chaotic advection. The rotating direction of the helical flows will be different, but this will not change the functions of the staggered herringbone structure.
It has been reported that the asymmetry index (ws/wl), the geometry of the patterns (a/b and θ), the number of herringbones per half cycle (N), and depth ratio of the groove (d/h) control the efficiency of mixing. In particular, helical flow increases significantly as the groove length to ridge length ratio a/b is maximized, and as N increases (Lynn et al., 2007, Lab on a Chip 7.5: 580-587). However, these two parameters counteract each other. Because the total length of the channel of the system is limited, having a large a/b value will result in a small N value. It has been found that the mixing performance is most sensitive to the asymmetry index and the depth ratio of the groove. In addition, when the design parameter ws/wl is equal to 0.21 and θ is 90°, the SHM will have a maximum mixing efficiency (Yang et al., 2005, Lab on a Chip 5.10: 1140-1147). Other factors to be considered in designing the parameters are channel depth (h) and groove length (a). Since the system may be adapted to provide high flow rate (up to 3 mL/s), the channel depth (h) may not be very large for the purpose of saving reagent consumption. Additionally, the smallest groove length may be constrained due to fabrication limitations, e.g., limitations of CNC machine on plastics. As a result, based on all the above-mentioned considerations, an example of design parameters for a staggered herringbone structure is shown in Table. 1. The present invention is not limited to the design parameters of Table 1.
Flow Cell System
The flow cell system (FCS) (100) comprises an encasement (200) wherein the encasement is adapted to enclose a slide (101). The flow cell system (100) can be configured to accept an appropriate slide, e.g., a standard slide size, a slide with a tissue cut, etc. In some embodiments, the encasement (200) provides a hermetically sealed environment for the slide (101). In some embodiments, the encasement (200) provides an environment that is at least a partially closed system, e.g., the encasement (200) reduces the amount of exposure the slide has to the outside environment.
The encasement (200) of the flow cell system (100) may be constructed to allow a slide to be inserted, e.g., prior to staining, and removed, e.g., at the end of the staining process. Without wishing to limit the present invention to any theory or mechanism, it may be advantageous to construct an encasement (200) from separated (e.g., two or more) parts. For example, the encasement (200) of the system (100) may then be able to be disassembled and reassembled for slide entry and removal or the structure of the channel (e.g., the area the system creates atop the slide so as to provide a reservoir for reagents) may then be more easily modified. For example, a user may find it easier to change the pattern of the top portion (herringbone, flat surface, etc.) or the height of the channel by switching out top portions. As such, the encasement (200) of the flow cell system (100) of the present invention may be constructed in a single piece or multiple pieces (e.g., two pieces, three pieces, four pieces, more than four pieces, etc.). The present invention is not limited to the configurations described herein.
Top Portion
Examples of top portions (210) are shown in
In some embodiments, the channel indentation (216) is shaped as shown in
The channel indentation (216) (or at least a portion thereof), e.g., a middle section of the channel indentation (216) or a portion thereof, comprises a pattern, e.g., a groove pattern (218). For example, a groove pattern (218) may be machined into at least a portion of the channel indentation (216). In some embodiments, the groove pattern (218) covers the entire surface of the channel indentation (216). In some embodiments, the groove pattern (218) covers a portion of the surface of the channel indentation (216).
The groove pattern (218) may have a variety of different designs. For example, in some embodiments, the groove pattern (218) comprises a staggered herringbone design.
In some embodiments, a perimeter groove (219) is disposed in the flow surface (212) of the top portion (210) of the encasement (200) surrounding the channel indentation (216). The perimeter groove (219) may provide space for a sealing component such as an o-ring (240). In some embodiments, the perimeter groove (219) surrounds or encompasses the entire groove pattern (218) or all of the channel indentation (216).
In some embodiments, the perimeter groove (219) is similar in shape to the channel indentation (216). For example, in some embodiments, the perimeter groove (219) is shaped as shown in
The examples shown herein show holes (e.g., for screws) around the perimeter groove (219). In some embodiments, the holes are positioned a distance (e.g., 3 mm) from the groove (219) so as to help provide a leak-free environment. The present invention is not limited to this configuration.
Bottom Portion
Examples of bottom portions (220) are shown in
In some embodiments, an access groove (225) is disposed adjacent to the slide indentation (224). The access groove (225) may help remove the slide (101) from the slide indentation (224). The access groove (225) may be constructed in any appropriate shape and size. For example, in some embodiments, the access groove (225) has a semi-circle shape.
Channel-Layer Portion
As previously discussed, in some embodiments, the encasement (200) comprises a channel-flow portion (230) adapted to lie atop a portion of the top surface of the slide (101) and atop a portion of the bottom portion (220) of the encasement (200) (see
In some embodiments, the channel-layer portion (230) can be removed from the encasement (200) and a different channel-layer portion (230) can be inserted into the encasement. The different channel-layer portions (230) may provide different channel heights or channel configurations. The channel layer portion (230) may be constructed in a variety of thicknesses to create a channel height as desired. For example, in some embodiments, the thickness of the channel layer portion (230) is from about 0.25 to 1.0 mm (e.g., 0.794 mm). The present invention is not limited to these dimensions of the channel layer portion (230). The channel layer portion (230) may be constructed from a variety of materials. For example, in some embodiments, the channel layer portion (230) is constructed from a material comprising polycarbonate. However, the present invention is not limited to this material.
The shape and size of the slit (238) may be constructed as appropriate. In some embodiments, the slit (238) has a shape that resembles the shape created by the channel indentation (216) and/or perimeter groove (219).
Flow Cell System Features
In some embodiments, during operation, the flow cell system (100) of the present invention is hermetically sealed, for example so as to prevent interactions between the outside environment and the reagents/tissues or cells, prevent reagent concentration change, and/or prevent the tissue from drying out. In some embodiments, the system (100) allows for controlling of the rate of mixing (e.g., mixing index from 0 to 1). In some embodiments, the system (100) allows for mixing in longitudinal and transverse directions.
In some embodiments, the system (100) allows for achieving flow speeds from 0 to 200 mm/s. In some embodiments, the system (100) is adapted to help reduce or avoid cross contamination, e.g., reagent to reagent, reagent to system, etc. Without wishing to limit the present invention to any theory or mechanism, it may be possible that the system (100) can help provide a laminar flow profile in the channel in comparison with the chaotic mixing flow profile such that users shall be able to calculate the shear stress at the tissue at different flow rates.
The system (100) of the present invention may comprise at least one or more inlet and one or more outlet for fluid flow. As an example, holes may be inserted through the top portion (210) of the encasement (200). In some embodiments, the segment of the through holes that are closed to the top surface are tapped for assembling flat-bottom fittings, which may firmly connect the flow channel and tubing. An inverted cone type fitting (⅛″ OD) can provide operation pressure up to 250 psi. Other types of fittings with advanced features (Type P or Gripper) can offer even higher operation pressure. In some embodiments, the system is configured to run different reagents through it. For example, the system may be configured to have multiple inlets where each inlet is for conducting a specific reagent.
In some embodiments, the fluid flow speed in the channel is adjustable, e.g., from 0 to 200 mm/s. As an example, if the channel cross-sectional area is 13 mm2, the maximum flow rate will be about 2.6 mL/s. This is a very high flow rate for reagents that are expensive, like antibody solution. In some embodiments, reagents may be collected from the outlet and infused back to the channel. This may be performed in a continuous way, e.g., a push-pull continuous cycle syringe pump may be used to support infusion and withdrawal simultaneously, e.g., at flow rates from 0 to 3 mL/s and with selectable target volumes.
The system of the present invention may further comprise tubing. In some embodiments, the tubing is constructed from material that has low compliance, e.g., to achieve high connection strength and quick response to flow rate change, for example PTFE, THV, etc. The fluidic resistance in the tubing may be lowered as much as possible (e.g., by using tubing with larger ID) while the dead volume in tubing may be kept as low as possible (e.g., by using tubing with smaller ID). To solve this conflict, tubing with moderate ID may be used.
The system (100) of the present invention is adapted to help create a closed system for tissue slide staining. In some embodiments, the system (100) may also help provide temperature control over reagents. For example, the system may be constructed from material that helps maintain appropriate temperatures for staining. In some embodiments, the reagent temperature at the tissue may be adjustable, e.g., between 25˜45° C. In some embodiments, the reagent temperature may be maintained at a temperature, e.g., with an accuracy of ±2° C. This may be achieved, for example, by configuring the system (100) to allow for the introduction of preheated reagents (e.g., heating the reagents prior to entering the channel of the system (100) of the present invention). In some embodiments, syringes are wrapped with heating pads and controlled using a thermo-kinetic heater control unit to heat up the reagents in the syringes quickly, e.g., between 25˜45° C.
The system (100) of the present invention may be constructed from material that allows for observation of the tissue, e.g., material that is transparent or translucent. In some embodiments, the system (100) is constructed such that a user is able to visualize fluid mixing in the system (100), e.g., from a top view, e.g., by means of microscopy or camera imaging. For example, some users may need to observe fluid flow in the system's channel during the staining process. In some embodiments, the image capturing system comprises a regular light microscope or an inverted microscope. In some embodiments, in order to visualize fluid mixing and assess the degree of mixing, tracers (e.g. color dyes or fluorescent particles) may be added to the reagent to indicate the streamlines of flows. In some embodiments, fluorescent particles are used in reagents and images of fluid flow are taken using a fluorescence microscope. Captured images may be analyzed to determine the degree of fluid mixing. In some embodiments, the system further comprises the image capturing system.
Example 1 describes materials and systems used for constructing a FCS of the present invention. The present invention is not limited to the materials and systems in Example 1.
In order to visualize fluid flows inside the channel, the system (100) may be made of transparent materials. One way to fabricate the system (100) is to use a 3D printer to build the parts. Another way to fabricate the system (100) is using CNC machining. An example of a 3D printer is a Stratasys Fortus 400mc, which works with engineering thermoplastics, like Acetal, ABS, ULTEM 9850, etc. However, these materials are non-transparent (note that ULTEM 1000, a transparent amber brown material, is not compatible with this printer). Polycarbonate (PC) is a commonly used and well-understood engineering thermoplastic material. Its inherent strength, excellent optical clarity, high heat distortion temperature, and dimensional stability make it an option for demanding, critical healthcare applications. Accordingly, polycarbonate may be chosen as the material to build the system (100). The following list shows the materials and software used for system (100) design, fabrication, and analysis.
Example 2 describes a flow cell test-bed setup for a system of the present invention. The present invention is not limited to the materials, configurations, and systems in Example 2.
Test 1: The goal of the test was to check if the system can prevent reagent leaking and air trapping throughout the entire flow rate range, from 0 to at least 2.6 mL/s (equal to 200 mm/s). The steps were as follows: The system was set up (system, a push/pull syringe pump, two syringes (140 mL for each), tubing, and tubing fittings). DI-water was applied to the system, and it was ensured that there were no visible air bubbles trapped in the system. Maximum required flow rate (3 mL/s) was applied to the system for 5 min. (Note: If there is no additional air bubble formed and no leaking occurs during the test, it means the goal is met). The test was repeated for other reagents with different viscosities, including proK. The output was a pass/fail evaluation.
Test 2: The goal of this test was to visualize and assess the degree of mixing in the channel. Two systems were tested and compared: (a) one with the herringbone structure, and (b) one without the herringbone structure (flat surface). The Test A steps were as follows: Four different gel color dyes (10 μL for each) were put at glass slide surface (towards the leading edge of the herringbone structure). The reagent was prepared: water with 0.4% detergent (e.g., works as a surfactant to lower the surface energy of water). The system was set up, including the system with the herringbone structure, a push/pull syringe pump, a 140 mL syringe with the reagent, tubing, and tubing fittings. The flow rate was set to 0.5 mL/min and a run was started. The reagent was collected from the outlet using a beaker. A CMOS camera was used to record videos at for 1 min from the top view. The flow rate was gradually increased to 5, 10, 20, 60, 140, and 180 mL/min. Steps were repeated for the system without the herringbone structure. The Test B steps were as follows: Four different gel color dyes (10 μL for each) were put at glass slide surface (towards both the leading and trailing edges of the herringbone structure). The reagent was prepared: water with 0.4% detergent (e.g., works as a surfactant to lower the surface energy of water). The system was set up, including the system with the herringbone structure, a push/pull syringe pump, two 140 mL syringes with the reagent, tubing, and tubing fittings. The flow rate was set to 3 mL/min and a run was started to transport 1 mL of reagent back and forth in the channel. A CMOS camera was used to record videos at for 10 min from the top view. The steps were repeated at a flow rate of 10 mL/min. The steps were repeated for the system without the herringbone structure. Image analysis: Images were selected from the recorded videos at an interval of 30 s from the initial state to the complete mixing state. A fixed region of interest across the channel on each image was selected. The mean pixel intensity (i.e. gray value, li) was measured, as well as the standard deviation of each image (Iσ). The maximum mean pixel intensity was found and was set as the Imax. Ii and Iσ were normalized to Imax, and the data was plotted. The normalized Ii and Iσ of each case for (a) and (b) were compared. The output was the plot of the normalized mean pixel intensity and standard deviation of each case.
Test 3: The goal of this test was to characterize the relationship between the reagent volume used in the system and the usable maximum flow rate. The steps were as follows: The achievable maximum flow rate was calculated for each syringe including, 10 mL, 30 mL, 60 mL, and 140 mL. The minimum required reagent volume was calculated for each syringe to perform a single run. The relationship was built between the steps. The output was a chart showing this relationship.
Test 4: The goal of this test was to evaluate if the system design can avoid cross contamination. The design allowed users to disassemble the system. The design allowed users to clean the system surface using ethanol wipes or general detergent. The output was a pass/fail evaluation.
Test 5: The goal of this test was to check if the heating system could meet the requirement. The steps were as follows: A thermistor was installed in channel through a fluidic port to assess on-slide temperature. The heating pads were wrapped around two 60 mL syringes and the reagent was heated up using a syringe heating unit. The pump was working and was providing a flow rate of 30 mL/min. (Note: If the target temperature is achieved and maintained with an accuracy of ±2° C. after 10 min, then the goal is met. If it is not met, then extend the test time to 15 min and recheck it.) The output was a pass/fail evaluation.
The mixing efficiencies of different flow cell designs were evaluated first by conducting a single directional flow experiment. There were three groups of testing in this experiment (1) a system with a flat surface top part, (2) a system with a herringbone structure top part, and (3) the same system as that in group (2) but with a reversed flow direction. Four gel color dyes (i.e. blue, yellow, green, and red) were placed close to the inlet of each system. Each dye was about 10 μL in volume, and was dispensed on the slide using a pipette. The distance between each gel dye is about 1 mm. The flow rate of DI-water (with 0.4% detergent) was increased gradually from 0-10 mL/min. Bright field images of the flow for each group were captured using a CMOS camera.
The results are shown in
A back and forth flow experiment was conducted to test the mixing efficiency of different systems in real working environment. In this experiment, four gel color dyes (10 μL for each) were placed at both the inlet and outlet of the system with a same order. 1 mL of DI-water (with 0.4% detergent) was transported back and forth across the system channel using a push/pull continuous cycle mode of the syringe pump. Two sets of testing were performed at fluid flow rate of 3 mL/min and 10 mL/min, respectively. Bright field images of the flow for each set were captured using a CMOS camera.
Similarly, this back and forth experiment was repeated at a higher flow rate, 10 mL/min. The image comparison was shown in
The reagent temperature control setup is shown in
The disclosures of the following documents are incorporated in their entirety by reference herein: Nguyen et al., 2005, Journal of Micromechanics and Microengineering 15.2: R1; Stroock et al., 2004, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences 362.1818: 971-986; Stroock et al., 2002, Science 295.5555: 647-651; Lynn et al., 2007, Lab on a Chip 7.5: 580-587; Yang et al., 2005, Lab on a Chip 5.10: 1140-1147, Lee et al., 2011, International Journal of Molecular Sciences 12.5: 3263-3287.
Various modifications of the invention, in addition to those described herein, will be apparent to those skilled in the art from the foregoing description. For example the disclosed system can not only be used to treat a tissue sample disposed on a microscope slide but to any sample disposed on a substrate. Non-limiting, further examples include a system for applying a reagent to a tissue, nucleic acid or protein array, or a system to treat a biological sample dispose on a MALDI-TOF target. Such modifications are also intended to fall within the scope of the appended claims. Each reference cited in the present application is incorporated herein by reference in its entirety.
Although there has been shown and described the preferred embodiment of the present invention, it will be readily apparent to those skilled in the art that modifications may be made thereto which do not exceed the scope of the appended claims. Therefore, the scope of the invention is only to be limited by the following claims. Reference numbers recited in the claims are exemplary and for ease of review by the patent office only, and are not limiting in any way. In some embodiments, the figures presented in this patent application are drawn to scale, including the angles, ratios of dimensions, etc. In some embodiments, the figures are representative only and the claims are not limited by the dimensions of the figures. In some embodiments, descriptions of the inventions described herein using the phrase “comprising” includes embodiments that could be described as “consisting of”, and as such the written description requirement for claiming one or more embodiments of the present invention using the phrase “consisting of” is met.
The reference numbers recited in the below claims are solely for ease of examination of this patent application, and are exemplary, and are not intended in any way to limit the scope of the claims to the particular features having the corresponding reference numbers in the drawings.
This disclosure claims priority to and the benefit of PCT Application PCT/EP2016/077199, filed Nov. 10, 2016, which claims priority to and the benefit of U.S. Provisional Patent Application No. 62/255,112, filed Nov. 13, 2015, both of which applications are incorporated by reference herein.
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
62255112 | Nov 2015 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | PCT/EP2016/077199 | Nov 2016 | US |
Child | 15976771 | US |