The present invention relates to a closing device consisting of a plastic material for applying to a closed container consisting of a plastic film material, wherein said closing device comprises a lower part with a cylindrical outlet and a flange for attaching same to the container and a screw cap which is screwably fixed to the lower part. Said closing device further comprises a cylindrical perforating element, which is open to both sides in the axial direction and travels in a threaded section of the outlet of said lower part, wherein means are located in the screw cap, which move the perforating element downwards in a helical manner when said screw cap is first turned and wherein said cylindrical perforating element has at least one tooth and a deflector on the cylindrical wall thereof at the end which is directed towards the container wall.
Closing devices of the type previously mentioned have to date only been mounted on containers produced from laminated film material. These laminated films comprise at least three layers of different types of material. Such a film consists on the one hand of a cardboard layer, which provides the container with the necessary rigidity, an aluminum layer serving as an aroma barrier and a plastic layer which ensures the required denseness. In order to separate these three layers, the corresponding perforating element of the aforementioned closing device must fulfill various functions. A plurality of saw teeth are often recommended for separating the cardboard layer, wherein a raised tooth cuts through the aluminum layer with a forward cutting edge and wherein a perforating tooth breaks through the plastic layer before the aforementioned cutting edge can continue to cut the plastic film. In the case of these containers consisting of laminated film material, the separation of the cardboard material generally represents a problem. Particularly if the partial press cut, which serves as a support and at least separates the cardboard layer to some extent, does not exactly correspond to the cutting line of the perforating element, the teeth are then either too weak or in the case of a considerable number of teeth, the cardboard material comes between the teeth and said teeth can thereafter hardly produce a perforating effect.
The present invention relates, however, to a closing device, which is applied to a pure plastic film material. Such tubular bags, mostly referred to as pouches in the technical language, have not been opened to date by means of the aforementioned closing devices. On the contrary, an opening was already punched out and a closure including the outlet thereof was welded on the pouches so as to be correctly positioned or was shrink-wrapped between two film layers. Because the shelf-life of the filled food material or beverage is thereby solely dependent upon the impermeability of the closure, such closures were virtually used only in unproblematic areas, particularly in the area of cosmetics. When using a closing device of the kind mentioned at the beginning of the application, the container pouch remains completely closed until the point of first being opened. An increased shelf-life is thereby provided. In addition, the plastic film in such applications according to the invention is substantially more robust and is designed having a greater wall thickness than the very thin plastic film layer in the case of a laminated film. This in turn gives rise to other demands being placed on the closing device. Initial trials with closing devices from prior art did not produce any reliable results. Plastic films tend to deform to a substantially greater extent. When using closing devices from prior art, the cutting teeth got caught in the film with the perforating tooth thereof and said film was thereby stretched. As a result of such stretching, the molecules are straightened out in thin plastic films and the material thereby becomes substantially tougher. It has basically been determined that plastic films of the kind of interest here tear easily or can be pierced or cut; however, the actual penetration of the film by the teeth can present a problem. The corresponding cardboard layer, which holds the plastic film in an immovable position, is particularly lacking in this case. The better the film is pre-tightened, the better said film can be perforated and subsequently cut open.
A closing device of the type mentioned at the beginning of the application is known from the WIPO patent publication WO 2008/092289. Said closing device has a plurality of cutting teeth evenly distributed across the circumference thereof, and the perforating element additionally comprises a deflector, the height of which is less than the height of the teeth. Said deflector consequently serves merely to push the partially cut-out rondelle out of the region of the outlet and to hold said rondelle in this deflected position in order to ensure that said rondelle, which has been turned down to the side, is held outside of the outlet region. The invention does not provide for an additional function of said deflector nor is one conceivable.
In contrast thereto, a closing device of similar type for a container consisting of laminated paper or cardboard is further known from the WIPO patent publication WO 2004/083055, which again comprises a deflector that is not as high as the at least one cutting tooth. Said deflector is additionally equipped with a perforating tooth. The corresponding inventive idea is based on the fact that in the event that the plastic film layer is not pierced by at least one cutting tooth, the film is tightened and pressed downwards and the succeeding deflector comprising a perforating tooth would be able to pierce the tightened film. This solution is based, however, on the fact that the plastic film layer of the laminated paper or cardboard, which is fixedly connected thereto, basically does not give way. Thus, if the previous teeth have already partially penetrated the laminated paper or cardboard wall, the unseparated layer continues to extend approximately at the original height. If the container consists, however, of a pure plastic film, the elasticity is therefore substantially greater and the entire layer is thus substantially more stretched and tightened, whereby the strength and toughness of the plastic film is increased and at the same time the perforating tooth of the deflector does not or hardly comes in contact with the downwardly deformed film region. Said solution can thus not be used in the case of a plastic container consisting of pure plastic film.
It is therefore the aim of the present invention to improve a closing device of the kind mentioned at the beginning of the application such that said device is suited to close a container consisting of pure plastic film and containing no proportion of paper or cardboard, wherein an improved and reliable opening of the container is achieved.
This aim is met by a closing device, which is characterized by the deflector protruding at least approximately past the at least one tooth so that during the initial opening of the container, said deflector contacts the container wall, which is to be cut open, simultaneously with or prior to the at least one cutting tooth coming in contact with same. In so doing, a certain pre-tightening of the plastic film is achieved prior to said cutting tooth contacting said film; thus enabling said cutting tooth with the perforating tip thereof to pierce said film in the tightened state and subsequently to cut the same.
A preferred exemplary embodiment of the subject matter of the invention is depicted in the accompanying drawings and subsequently described. The following is shown:
As previously mentioned,
The cylindrical perforating element 5 has an external thread, which meshes with an internal thread of the previously mentioned outlet 6. In so doing, said perforating element 5 is driven by means in the screw cap 4, which are not depicted here and also are not relevant for understanding the invention. These means are normally driving elements, which stay in contact with corresponding driving elements on the inside of the cylindrical perforating element 5. During the initial opening of the closing device 1, the screw cap 4 is unscrewed, wherein said cap is moved away in the direction of the flange 3 and consequently also in the direction of the wall of the container, upon which the closing device 1 is mounted. At the same time, the cylindrical perforating element 5, which has the same rotational direction but an opposite axial component, is moved so that said perforating element 5 moves out of the outlet 6; and in the process the wall of the container, which is not depicted here, is opened.
As mentioned earlier, the initial position is shown in
A developed view of the perforating element 5 is shown in enlarged scale in
Due to the rounded edge 14, said edge cannot get caught in the plastic film and merely presses against the same, whereby said edge simultaneously tightens said plastic film. In so doing, an improved perforation and an improved perforation effect are achieved, and at the same time the cutting edge 9 now operates smoothly. Were the superelevation designed too high, the film would be deformed so far in a downward direction that the cutting teeth subsequently acting on said film would no longer come into contact with the same. It is therefore sufficient if the superelevation is at least the same height as the perforating tip of the at least one cutting tooth 7 or slightly protrudes above the height of said tooth.
The forces arising here are generally relatively large, even on the deflector 10; and there is a risk that this elevated section will be bent. By means of its three dimensional, round form, the forerunning shoulder 13 has a stiffening effect, whereas the part actually having an effect on the force, namely the rounded edge, protrudes only slightly beyond the shoulder edge 18.
Number | Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
10 2009 045 119.6 | Sep 2009 | DE | national |
Filing Document | Filing Date | Country | Kind | 371c Date |
---|---|---|---|---|
PCT/EP2010/064206 | 9/27/2010 | WO | 00 | 6/12/2012 |