The present invention relates in general to container closures and closure assemblies that include a nestable and extendable spout. More specifically, the present invention relates to the addition of a thicker material section to the wall of the spout such that the spout can be deflected and set in a desired direction. In another embodiment of the present invention, a flexible, tamper-evident portion is added to a closing cap and is shaped as an arcuate band and fabricated as an integral portion of the closing cap.
Container closures and closure assemblies of the type generally described herein often include some tamper-evident feature incorporating a plurality of frangible elements. One such product has been offered by Rieke Corporation of Auburn, Ind., under its FLEXSPOUT® trademark. This product includes a tamper-evident cap and a closure body with a nestable and extendable spout. The tamper-evident cap threads onto the threaded end of the spout and the cap must be removed in order to gain access to the contents of the container (drum) via the interior of the spout. In one arrangement the closure body is received by a raised surrounding (annular) wall that defines the container opening and when used on a metal drum end, the closure includes an annular retaining member that fits over an outer wall portion of the closure body and, by crimping, secures the outer wall portion to the surrounding wall that defines the container opening. In other arrangements that are suitable for the closure assembly of the present invention, different styles of containers and openings are used. The closure assembly construction further includes a series of frangible elements that connect a pair of bail handles that are used to extend the spout with the remainder of the cap. When a plastic drum or container receives a FLEXSPOUT® closure, the tamper-evident cap includes an outer annular portion that snaps over an outer wall portion of the closure body and secures the outer wall portion to the surrounding wall that defines the container opening. A series of frangible elements connects the outer annular portion of the tamper-evident cap with the remainder of the cap body, principally with a pair of bail handles that are used to extend the spout.
Over the years, as others have tried to imitate the Rieke FLEXSPOUT® closure, the market has provided more choices to consumers, but at a cost. Some of the flexible closing spout imitations do not provide design reliability and predictability. The result is the possibility for some of the tamper-evident frangible elements to be broken at the time of the capping operation. Once customers learn that the frangible elements can be broken without a tampering attempt, these customers begin to pay less attention to the status of the closure. This in turn runs the risk of compromising the efficacy of using frangible elements, at least in the minds of the end user consumers. In other instances with the imitation closures, the frangible elements are hard to see and difficult to determine if one or more of these frangible elements are broken.
In one embodiment of the present invention, there is provided a tamper-evident portion, shaped as an arcuate band, that begins in a tucked and generally concealed orientation by being deflected downwardly in between the closing cap and an outer portion of the spout. This tamper-evident band is then deployed at the time of initial opening so that a majority of the band including its upper surface are visible and this in turn provides a way to alert the end user, for example, of any tampering attempt. This tamper-evident band replaces the use of any frangible elements as the only means of determining whether or not a tampering attempt has been made. Further, there is no risk that the capping operation could ever deploy the tucked in tamper-evident band. As a result, the end user can rely on the closure status as an absolute guarantee for alerting the end user of any tampering attempt. Any attempt by an unauthorized individual to raise the bail handles of the closing cap in order to either remove the closing cap and/or extend the spout will pull the tamper-evident band (portion) out of its tucked and generally concealed initial orientation and this tamper-evident band will be visible to the end user, putting that end user on notice that some tampering attempt may have been made.
An added benefit of the present invention is the ability to use the surface of the tamper-evident band as a marking or embossing surface for some type of message, warning, or alert. Due to the tucked position of the tamper-evident band, as it is initially assembled, this message is not visible and remains concealed until the tamper-evident band is deployed (i.e., pulled out of its tucked position). The type of message, warning, or alert that can be applied to the upper surface of the tamper-evident band is only limited by the surface area, taking into consideration the character height and spacing.
A further feature of the present invention is the addition of a thicker section of material as part of the extendable spout that functions as a memory band. This memory band allows the extended spout to be flexed or bent in a desired direction and then stay there, in that selected orientation, similar in structure and function to how a hospital straw, for example, is able to be bent or flexed in a desired direction or orientation and then remain in that orientation. When a vented closure is used, similar to the structure disclosed in U.S. Pat. No. 4,618,078, issued Oct. 21, 1986 to Hamman et al., the flexing or bending of the spout in a desired direction provides an added benefit. The bending or flexing of the spout into the desired direction for discharge of the contents of the container puts into play only those venting ears that are advantageous to the actual dispensing and takes the other venting ears out of play. This in turn yields a larger dispensing opening and therefore a faster flow rate for the outflow or dispensing of product from the container. The outflow of fluid product from the drum or container is still glug-free due to the fact that some of the venting ears are still used and these venting ears that are in play provide an adequate path and sufficient flow area for air based upon the exiting flow rate. The improvements provided by the present invention can be used together as well as independently.
A closure assembly for a container, the container including a dispensing opening, according to one embodiment of the present invention, comprises a closure body including a nestable and extendable spout, the spout having a generally cylindrical section and a frustoconical section, and an invertible fold between the two sections, the generally cylindrical section defining an outlet opening, a tamper-evident closing cap constructed and arranged for assembly to the spout for closing off the outlet opening, and wherein the frustoconical section includes a wall having a first wall thickness and a memory band portion with a second wall thickness that is greater than the first wall thickness, the memory band portion being constructed and arranged for enabling said closure body to maintain a selected orientation upon deflecting the closure body into the selected orientation for directional discharge of container contents.
One object of the present invention is to provide an improved closure assembly for a container.
Related objects and advantages of the present invention will be apparent from the following description.
For the purposes of promoting an understanding of the principles of the invention, reference will now be made to the embodiments illustrated in the drawings and specific language will be used to describe the same. It will nevertheless be understood that no limitation of the scope of the invention is thereby intended, such alterations and further modifications in the illustrated device, and such further applications of the principles of the invention as illustrated therein being contemplated as would normally occur to one skilled in the art to which the invention relates.
Referring to
Closure assembly 20 includes a closure body 22, tamper-evident closing cap 23, and annular metal retainer 24. Each of these three component parts constitutes a unitary component with the closure body 22 being molded out of plastic, tamper-evident closing cap 23 being molded out of plastic, and retainer 24 being formed as a unitary component out of metal. The details of the closure body 22 are illustrated in
With continued reference to
The tamper-evident closing cap 23 is internally threaded and the dispensing end 30 of the nestable and extendable spout 31 of closure body 22 is externally threaded for receipt of the closing cap 23. The closing cap 23 can be threaded onto spout 31 either before or after the closure body is crimped onto outlet wall 27 by the use of metal retainer 24. However, in terms of an initial subassembly of closure assembly 20 with its three component parts, the metal retainer 24 would be preassembled onto the closure body.
Referring to
With continued reference to
Referring now to
The spout 31 can be considered as having two sections, an inner, generally cylindrical, section 53 and an outer, frustoconical, section 54. These two sections are separated by the invertible fold 48. The outer section 54 includes a series of venting ears 57 that are positioned at fold 58 and depend in an axially downward direction when the closure body 22 is in its nested orientation. When the closure body 22, specifically the spout 31, is extended, the fold 58 moves and flips the venting ears 57 into a lateral orientation, see
When the tamper-evident closing cap 23 is fully threaded onto spout 31, the inner surface 62 pushes down on the free end 50b of the pull ring 50. However, due to the elastic properties of the plastic used for the closure body 22, once the tamper-evident closing cap 23 is removed, the pull ring 50 flexes (pivots) upwardly so that the free end 50b is returned to its free state, slightly above the upper edge 31a of spout 31, as illustrated in
Closing cap 23 includes, as part of its unitary, molded plastic construction, a pair of oppositely-disposed bail handles 44 and 45. Each bail handle 44 and 45 is joined to the remainder of the closing cap 23 by living hinge 67 and 68, respectively. As initially configured, prior to any opening of the closure assembly, the bail handles 44 and 45 lay substantially flat (planar) and the geometric plane in which they lay is substantially parallel with the planar upper surface 19a of the container end. Surrounding the bail handles 44 and 45 and unitarily joined therewith as part of the molded plastic construction of cap 23 is an arcuate, flexible “warning” flap 69. Flap 69 is constructed and arranged for a message to be screened, embossed, or otherwise marked in some fashion, depending on the intended use and circumstances relating to closure assembly 20. Since it may be possible to provide a suitable closure assembly with only one bail handle, the flexible “warning” flap is described as being arcuate in form. It is though contemplated by the present invention that, with the use of two bail handles forming a substantially annular ring around the closing cap 23, the flap 69 would be generally annular in shape. A further option is to configure flap 69 into two similar arcuate sections of approximately 180 degrees, or slightly less, each.
Flap 69, whether as an annular form or as an arcuate section, or as two arcuate sections, is initially deflected and tucked down into the space between the bail handles and the metal retainer 24, up against the annular inner wall 70 of the metal retainer 24, as illustrated in
While the deployment of flap 69, even without any markings, writings, or message, would still indicate an attempt to tamper with the container contents, or at least an attempt to open the closure assembly, the addition of some type of warning or alert message directly onto the flap provides an added reminder to the end user and helps to reinforce the understanding that, if the flap 69 is out of its tucked or inserted condition, the end user should be aware that someone, at some time “upstream”, lifted the bail handles and the only reason to do so would be an attempt to open the closure assembly. The use of flap 69 provides a different style of tamper evidencing and thus the reason to select the term “warning” in describing the construction and use of flap 69. The intended message is some type of statement or explanation that if flap 69 is deployed, be careful when dispensing and using the contents of the container.
When the bail handles 44 and 45 are secured by some type of frangible element connection, that style of connection could serve as another indicator of a tampering attempt. However, that tamper-evident technique would typically not be as visible and not as pronounced as the use of flap 69. Further, some of the products that are currently on the market as an imitation of the Rieke FLEXSPOUT® product may include broken frangible elements due to the manner of construction and design and the presence of broken frangible elements when there has not been any tampering attempt tends to desensitize the end user to the significance of the frangible elements. Preferably frangible elements are not used for either of the bail handles 44 and 45.
The tear-out diaphragm 49 can also serve as another indicator of a tampering attempt if the end user knows and can always remember that the tear-out diaphragm 49 should be present on the interior of spout 31 and should be completely secured to the spout around its entire inside diameter. Even with these alternatives for tamper indicating measures, the use of warning flap 69 is believed to be preferred in that the only way to actually defeat flap 69 is to cut it off completely and with a near perfect, completely smooth edge. That becomes a very difficult, if not virtually impossible task, considering the size, shape, and material of flap 69 and the time and tools available to the individual considering a tampering attempt. Even if the end user may not know or recall that a warning flap should be present, a jagged cut edge will certainly put that end user on notice that something is wrong, or at least may be wrong.
In use, whether or not the bail handles 44 and 45 are each secured in a down and flush orientation by a frangible element, the living hinge and the initially molded condition positions the bail handles down and generally flush with the upper surface of the tamper-evident closing cap 23. The planar orientation of the two bail handles positions them in a geometric plane that is substantially parallel with upper surface 19a. However, when the bail handles are lifted as the only effective way to either remove the closing cap 23 and/or extend spout 31, the living hinges 67 and 68 experience a slight plastic deformation. This causes the bail handles 44 and 45 to remain slightly raised, see
Another feature of the present invention can best be seen in the enlarged detail of
There is a benefit to be realized from simply being able to direct the spout 31 and have it maintain that selected orientation. By remaining in the desired (selected) orientation for dispensing contents from the container, the end user can control the dispensing direction, see
However, an added benefit is realized when the closure body associated with the “directional” spout 31 is configured with the illustrated and disclosed venting ears 57. With reference first to
When the spout 31 is flexed in a direction to achieve a desired orientation, see
Referring now to
Referring now to
The annular outer lip 96 of closure body 97 is configured with a friction fit shape having a flange portion 96a, recessed annular channel 96b, and depending, tapered annular wall 96c. This form of lip 96 is suitable for an axially forced-in (or inserted), friction fit into plastic container 98 opening 98a (see
Opening 98a is generally circular and includes a form and shape that tightly and securely receives lip 96 with a snap-in fit assembly. The tapered form of annular wall 96c facilitates the axial insertion of the closure body 97. Opening 99a is generally circular and includes a form and shape that tightly and securely receives lip 96 with a snap-fit assembly. The tapered form of annular wall 96c facilitates the axial insertion of the closure body 97.
Referring now to
Closure assembly 91 is virtually identical to closure assembly 20 except for the elimination of metal retainer 24 and changing the shape and configuration of the outer lip 28. Otherwise, the closing cap 105 is identical to closing cap 23, including all structural features, materials, dimensions and relationships for the cap body, the bail handles, and flap. Flap 106 is identical to flap 69 and is initially folded and tucked into position in substantially the same way as flap 69. Flap 106 also deploys in the same way as flap 69 when the bail handle or handles 107 are lifted as part of the process to extend the spout 108 from its nested orientation.
The annular outer lip 109 of closure body 110 is configured with an internally-threaded, depending annular wall 111. The threaded wall 111 is constructed and arranged to tightly and securely thread onto outlet wall 102 (see
While the invention has been illustrated and described in detail in the drawings and foregoing description, the same is to be considered as illustrative and not restrictive in character, it being understood that only the preferred embodiment has been shown and described and that all changes and modifications that come within the spirit of the invention are desired to be protected.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
2561596 | Rieke | Jul 1951 | A |
3604740 | Summers | Sep 1971 | A |
3613966 | Summers | Oct 1971 | A |
4236629 | Dwinell | Dec 1980 | A |
4294382 | Summers et al. | Oct 1981 | A |
4320861 | Rieke et al. | Mar 1982 | A |
4555048 | Hamman et al. | Nov 1985 | A |
4568006 | Mueller et al. | Feb 1986 | A |
4618078 | Hamman et al. | Oct 1986 | A |
4632282 | Nagashima | Dec 1986 | A |
4699290 | Adams | Oct 1987 | A |
4718553 | Adamoli et al. | Jan 1988 | A |
4801031 | Barriac | Jan 1989 | A |
4805791 | Begley | Feb 1989 | A |
4877143 | Travisano | Oct 1989 | A |
4921147 | Poirier | May 1990 | A |
4981230 | Marshall et al. | Jan 1991 | A |
5035341 | Heilman et al. | Jul 1991 | A |
5088632 | Odet et al. | Feb 1992 | A |
5096079 | Odet | Mar 1992 | A |
5641099 | McLelland et al. | Jun 1997 | A |
5722570 | Sultzer et al. | Mar 1998 | A |
5788100 | Sturk | Aug 1998 | A |
5899364 | McLelland et al. | May 1999 | A |
5967376 | McLelland et al. | Oct 1999 | A |
6135985 | Fromer | Oct 2000 | A |
6193921 | Nelson | Feb 2001 | B1 |
6641007 | Chung et al. | Nov 2003 | B2 |
6712246 | Nobbio | Mar 2004 | B2 |
20050274815 | Bergholtz et al. | Dec 2005 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
38 05 648 | Sep 1989 | DE |
0 221 419 | May 1987 | EP |
0 161 746 | Apr 1989 | EP |
0 432 059 | Jun 1993 | EP |
2 578 819 | Sep 1986 | FR |
1 270 086 | Apr 1972 | GB |
2 055 772 | Mar 1981 | GB |
2 121 374 | Dec 1983 | GB |
WO 0034133 | Jun 2000 | WO |
WO 0249931 | Jun 2002 | WO |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20070284399 A1 | Dec 2007 | US |