This application is a national entry application of PCT Application WO 2008/064746 filed on Oct. 19, 2007, entitled “Closure Device For Explosion Forming” which claims priority from German Patent No. 10 2006 056 788 filed on Dec. 1, 2006, entitled “Verschlusseinrichtung für das Explosionsumformen” (Closure Device For Explosion Forming), the disclosures of which are incorporated herein by reference for all purposes.
The invention relates to a closure device for explosive forming.
During explosive forming, a generally tubular work piece is plastically widened by the developing internal pressure. Before the forming process, the work piece is situated in a closed die and then forced against the die cavity by the internal pressure. The high internal pressure required for this forms by ignition of a gas mixture in the interior; at detonation velocities to 5000 m/s, the die must withstand forces equivalent to about 400 t. Tight closure of the forming die is therefore of special significance for explosive forming.
An explosive forming method is described in the subsequently published German Patent Application 10 2005 025 660 “Device and Method for Explosive Forming.” The described device is used, in particular, to form a seal between the closed die and the tube-like work piece by a conical plug. This plug forms the continuation of an ignition tube, which can be moved between a work position against the die and a rest position at a standoff from the die. For this purpose, the force and stroke of a hydraulic cylinder are transmitted by a control element. In the laterally opened control element operated by the hydraulic cylinder, an oblique groove is situated for the ignition tube and an axially running straight groove for an engagement element. The axially guided ignition tube is moved over the oblique groove by movement of the control element. The engagement element is not engaged by movement of the control element, since it is guided to move in the straight groove.
The underlying task of the invention is to configure a closure device for explosive forming, with which an explosive forming die can be closed and the explosion forces supported in a simple and reliable manner by means of a movement of a connection unit.
This task is solved according to the invention by a closure device for explosive forming of a work piece. The closure device includes an explosive forming die that defines a cavity for forming the work piece. A connection unit is moveable relative to the explosive forming die along an axis between a working position and a rest position. In the working position, the connection unit is moved towards the explosive forming die to situate the connection unit on the explosive forming die. In the rest position, the connection unit is moved away the explosive forming die. A static holding structure is disposed about at least a portion of the connection unit. A wedge structure engages the connection unit and is disposed within the static holding structure. The wedge structure is moveable relative to the static holding structure transverse to the axis to move the connection unit between the working position and the rest position.
The static holding structure, as an additional element, permits separation of the two functions, fastening of the closure device on the molding die and wedge-transmitting motion coupling between the wedge structure and the connection unit. Guiding of the moving wedge structure on the static holding structure permits a uniform motion process of same, despite high activation and explosive forces. In addition, these forces acting transversely partly through the bypass can be supported laterally on the static holding structure.
In a favorable practical example, the static holding structure encloses the wedge structure like a frame. At the occurring significant explosive forces, this can contribute to stability and torsional stiffness of the closure device and ensure roughly equivalent alignment of the components relative to each other.
In a special variant of the invention, sliding aids are provided on the surfaces moved relative to each other between the wedge structure and the static holding structure. These sliding aids can support uniform movement of the wedge structure on the static holding structure and promote force support via the static holding structure.
Advantageously, these sliding aids are metallic antifriction coatings. Metallic antifriction coatings withstand high occurring forces, as here during activation and as a result of the explosion.
In a particularly favorable variant, the static holding structure is fastened to the explosive forming die. The static holding structure can therefore be supported on the explosive molding die and remain static in its position relative to the die, despite the closure and explosive forces.
It can be advantageous to connect the static holding structure by at least one anchoring element to the explosive molding die. The static holding structure can therefore be reliably and effectively supported on the explosive molding die.
The at least one anchoring element can be mounted especially on the static holding structure in at least one shape-mated receptacle. The closure and explosive forces can be reliably transferred via engagement.
In an advantageous variant, movement of the connection unit is guided on the anchoring element. This guarantees reliable alignment of the movement of the connection unit relative to the die and the static holding structure.
Advantageously, friction-reducing intermediate elements are provided on the surfaces moved relative to each other between the connection unit and the anchoring element, in order to be able to support uniform movement of the connection unit on the anchoring element.
The friction-reducing intermediate elements are advantageously metallic antifriction coatings, which have a long lifetime and limited wear at high loading forces.
In an advantageous variant, the wedge structure encloses the connection unit roughly U-shaped across the direction of movement of the connection unit. The forces acting on the wedge structure are therefore taken up well by it, in which case the movement of the connection unit is made possible.
The connection unit has at least one transfer element motion-coupled to the wedge structure across the direction of movement of the connection unit, on which the wedge structure is movable. The forces and movements of the wedge structure are transferred to the connection unit on the transfer element.
In a favorable variant, the wedge structure has a wedge guide, with which the at least one transfer element is engaged. The wedge guide is particularly suited for guiding the transfer element in it, without tilting.
In a favorable variant of the invention, the at least one transfer element and the at least one wedge guide are sloped in the same direction and to the same degree relative to the movement direction of the connection unit. This can improve transfer of forces and strokes and permit uniform movements of the transfer element in the wedge guide.
Advantageously, on the surfaces that are moved relative to each other, slide-promoting intermediate structures are provided between the at least one transfer element and the at least one wedge guide. This permits more effective force transfer between the transfer element and the wedge mount.
In a favorable practical example, the slide-promoting intermediate structures are metallic antifriction coatings. Metallic antifriction coatings are characterized by a general low attrition at high forces.
The wedge structure is advantageously moved by means of an operating element, especially a hydraulic actuator. The operating element can be selected according to the requirements in terms of force and stroke. Hydraulic actuators are suitable because of the high attainable forces connected with sufficient precision.
It can be advantageous that the operating element extends across the wall of the static holding structure. “Wall” in this sense means side, cover and/or bottom walls. Good access of the operating element to the wedge structure in the closure device is therefore guaranteed.
In a special variant of the invention, the closure device is fastened releasably to the explosive forming die as a unit. The closure device, depending on the application, can be mounted on a desired die and later optionally mounted on another die for a new application.
The static holding structure favorably has a roughly ring-like closed structure. Such closed structures can be extremely stable and torsionally stiff, which can be a major advantage at the forces occurring in explosive forming.
In one variant, the static holding structure is closed roughly ring-like by a yoke. The yoke closes the holding structure in reinforcing fashion and can ensure good accessibility to the parts situated in the static holding structure during assembly and disassembly. During manufacture, the mentioned multipart characteristic can also be an advantage in terms of manufacturing demands and costs.
It is advantageous if the connection unit is supported to slide on the yoke. This additional guiding can support uniform movement of the connection unit and contribute to torsional stiffness of the entire device.
At least one of the surfaces moved relative to each other advantageously has at least one sliding element between the connection unit and the yoke. These additional elements can also have the advantage, in addition to reducing friction, of compensating manufacturing tolerances.
Favorably, the sliding elements have metallic antifriction coatings. In particular, metallic antifriction coatings can be produced with very close tolerances.
In a favorable practical example of the invention, the connection unit has two transfer elements and the wedge structure has two wedge guides across the direction of movement of the connection unit. The presence of two elements in engagement can ensure that force flow is divided and better supported.
In an advantageous variant, the connection unit has at least one gas feed unit and/or ignition device and/or die closure and/or die seal.
This and other objects of the invention can be more fully appreciated from the following detailed description of the preferred embodiments.
Exemplary embodiments of the invention will now be described in conjunction with the following drawings wherein like numerals represent like elements, and wherein:
The same reference numbers refer to the same parts or features, regardless of the figure in which they are shown.
The closure device 1 is connected to the explosive forming die 5 and 6 via an anchoring element 7. This anchoring element 7 is accommodated in a shape-mated receptacle 8 of a static holding structure 9. A wedge structure 10 is guided to move in the static holding structure 9, which is operated by a hydraulic actuator 11. The connection unit 14 with the plug 38 formed on it can be moved via a transfer element 13 guided in a wedge guide 12. The connection unit 14 is guided axially in the anchoring element 7, so that movements can only be transferred in this direction 28.
The ratio of the force to be applied to operate the wedge structure 10 to the resulting force that moves the connection unit 14 is about 3-5:1, especially 3.5-4.5:1, and, in particular, about 4:1. For this purpose, the wedge guide 12 is sloped about 60° to 85°, especially 75° to 80°, and, in particular, about 77°, relative to the movement direction 28 of connection unit 14. This guarantees a favorable force ratio, in order to properly take up brief high force peaks and thus hold the connection unit 14 in the desired position 15 even during the explosion. Depending on the slope of the wedge guide 12, the inertia of the wedge structure 10 also contributes to this task.
In a working position 15 of the connection unit 14, the connection unit 14 is situated on forming die 5 and 6 and the plug 38 in die cavity 37. Hydraulic actuator 11 is then also situated in its working position 16. If the hydraulic actuator 11 is now operated in direction 27, so that it is moved from its working position 15 into its rest position 17, shown by the dashed line, the wedge structure 10 moves to the same degree with the hydraulic actuator 11. The transfer elements 13 of connection unit 14 guided in wedge guide 12 are forced to movement 28 across the mentioned movement 27 of hydraulic actuator 11 and therefore wedge structure 10. Because of this, the connection element 14 executes an axial movement from its working position 15 into its rest position 18, shown by the dashed line, in which it is at a standoff from the forming die 5 and 6.
In the cross-section of connection unit 14, a gas feed and ignition system 19 with a straight ignition tube and transversely perforated gas feed lines is shown. The gas system 19 is supplied via corresponding lines 35 with valves 20. Ignition of the gas mixture occurs via an ignition device 39.
From the schematic view in
An embodiment of the individual components of the closure device 1, especially the transfer elements 13, is apparent in detail from the following
For example, a yoke 21 and an actuator plate 22 are also only shown in the subsequent figures, in the interest of simplicity, for which reason plug 38 is not further discussed.
The gas feed 19 is apparent on the connection unit 14. The anchoring element 7, formed in two parts here, is also apparent. The dash-dot line 26 shows the axis of the closure device 1 and, at the same time, the motion direction of the connection unit 14.
By omitting the upper anchoring element 7 in the drawing,
A work piece to be formed is introduced to die 5, 6, which is closed, together with the two-part anchoring element 7, corresponding to upper 5 and lower box 6. The anchoring element 7 is then guided in the mount 8 aligned in the direction of the closure movement. For explosive forming of the work piece, the connection unit 14 is moved to the die 5, 6. For this purpose, the hydraulic actuator 11 operates the wedge structure 10 via actuator plate 22. The transfer elements 13, guided in the wedge guide 12 of wedge structure 10, together with the axial guide of connection unit 14 into the anchoring element 7, produce a movement of the connection unit to the forming die 5, 6. Because of the slope of wedge guide 12 relative to mount 8 of the anchoring element 7 and the movement direction 27 of wedge structure 10 and hydraulic actuator 11, axial offset of the connection unit 14 occurs in direction 28 toward die 5, 6.
An ignitable gas mixture is introduced through gas lines 35 and valves 20 by a gas feed and ignition system 19 into the work piece interior and ignited by ignition 39. The high recoil following the explosion acts against the operating direction on the connection unit 14, but is supported by the static holding structure 9 and partly diverted via its connection to the molding die 5, 6 via anchoring element 7, so that the forces can be used for sealing closure of the die 5, 6 by connection unit 14. After forming, the connection unit 14 is separated again from molding die 5, 6 in the rest position 18 by opposite movements of the hydraulic actuator 11 and wedge structure 10.
Number | Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
10 2006 056 788 | Dec 2006 | DE | national |
Filing Document | Filing Date | Country | Kind | 371c Date |
---|---|---|---|---|
PCT/EP2007/009113 | 10/19/2007 | WO | 00 | 6/1/2009 |
Publishing Document | Publishing Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
WO2008/064746 | 6/5/2008 | WO | A |
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
392635 | Powers | May 1933 | A |
3160949 | Bussey et al. | Dec 1964 | A |
3252312 | Maier | May 1966 | A |
3342048 | Johnson et al. | Sep 1967 | A |
3600921 | Schwarz | Aug 1971 | A |
3640110 | Inoue | Feb 1972 | A |
3654788 | Kimura | Apr 1972 | A |
3661004 | Lee et al. | May 1972 | A |
1280451 | Hagen | Jul 1972 | A |
3737975 | McKinnon, Jr. | Jun 1973 | A |
3742746 | Erlandson | Jul 1973 | A |
4187709 | Legate et al. | Feb 1980 | A |
4471640 | Kortenski et al. | Sep 1984 | A |
4492104 | Weaver et al. | Jan 1985 | A |
4494392 | Schroeder | Jan 1985 | A |
4571800 | Faupell | Feb 1986 | A |
4738012 | Hughes et al. | Apr 1988 | A |
4788841 | Calhoun et al. | Dec 1988 | A |
4856311 | Conaway | Aug 1989 | A |
5187962 | Bilko et al. | Feb 1993 | A |
5220727 | Hochstein | Jun 1993 | A |
5339666 | Suzuki et al. | Aug 1994 | A |
5377594 | Alford | Jan 1995 | A |
5890698 | Domytrak | Apr 1999 | A |
8047036 | Trubert et al. | Nov 2011 | B2 |
20060060601 | Kubacki et al. | Mar 2006 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
248838 | Aug 1966 | AT |
276032 | Nov 1969 | AT |
371384 | Jun 1983 | AT |
409831 | Oct 1966 | CH |
1452667 | Dec 1938 | DE |
1218986 | Jan 1967 | DE |
1235246 | Mar 1967 | DE |
1129562 | Oct 1968 | DE |
1452665 | May 1969 | DE |
1452667 | May 1969 | DE |
1527949 | Nov 1969 | DE |
1801784 | Jun 1970 | DE |
1808942 | Jun 1970 | DE |
2043251 | Sep 1970 | DE |
1777207 | Apr 1971 | DE |
1777208 | Apr 1971 | DE |
2043251 | Mar 1972 | DE |
2059181 | Jun 1972 | DE |
2107460 | Aug 1972 | DE |
2357295 | May 1974 | DE |
2337176 | Jun 1975 | DE |
114231 | Jul 1975 | DE |
2622317 | Jan 1977 | DE |
2628579 | Dec 1977 | DE |
2908561 | Oct 1979 | DE |
158364 | Dec 1983 | DE |
3341488 | May 1984 | DE |
3305615 | Aug 1984 | DE |
217154 | Jan 1985 | DE |
3590248 | Jun 1986 | DE |
3512015 | Oct 1986 | DE |
260450 | Sep 1988 | DE |
3709181 | Sep 1988 | DE |
4035894 | Jan 1992 | DE |
4232913 | Apr 1994 | DE |
19536292 | Apr 1997 | DE |
19638679 | Mar 1998 | DE |
19638688 | Mar 1998 | DE |
19709918 | Sep 1998 | DE |
19818572 | Nov 1999 | DE |
19852302 | May 2000 | DE |
19915383 | Oct 2000 | DE |
19957836 | Jun 2001 | DE |
10328154 | Dec 2004 | DE |
102005025660 | Dec 2006 | DE |
102006056788 | Dec 2006 | DE |
102007007330 | Feb 2007 | DE |
102007023669 | May 2007 | DE |
102006008533 | Aug 2007 | DE |
102007036196 | Aug 2007 | DE |
102006019856 | Nov 2007 | DE |
102006037754 | Jan 2008 | DE |
102008006979 | Jan 2008 | DE |
102006037742 | Feb 2008 | DE |
102006060372 | Jun 2008 | DE |
0151490 | Aug 1985 | EP |
148459 | Nov 1987 | EP |
0288705 | Nov 1988 | EP |
00371018 | Jul 1992 | EP |
0592068 | Apr 1994 | EP |
0590262 | Apr 1996 | EP |
0765675 | Apr 1997 | EP |
0830906 | Mar 1998 | EP |
0830907 | Mar 1998 | EP |
1702695 | Sep 2006 | EP |
1849551 | Oct 2007 | EP |
1342377 | Sep 1963 | FR |
2300322 | Feb 1975 | FR |
2280465 | Feb 1976 | FR |
7503396 | Sep 1976 | FR |
742460 | Jun 1952 | GB |
878178 | Sep 1961 | GB |
1129562 | Oct 1968 | GB |
1280451 | Jul 1972 | GB |
1419889 | Dec 1975 | GB |
1436538 | May 1976 | GB |
1501049 | Feb 1978 | GB |
1542519 | Mar 1979 | GB |
2009651 | Jun 1979 | GB |
2047147 | Nov 1980 | GB |
55-139128 | Oct 1980 | JP |
58145381 | Aug 1983 | JP |
2117728 | May 1990 | JP |
739958 | Feb 1995 | JP |
70505176 | Feb 1995 | JP |
2001054866 | Feb 2001 | JP |
2002093379 | Mar 2002 | JP |
2007-222778 | Sep 2007 | JP |
9933590 | Jul 1999 | WO |
0000309 | Jan 2000 | WO |
2004028719 | Apr 2004 | WO |
2006128519 | Dec 2006 | WO |
2008098608 | Aug 2008 | WO |
2009095042 | Aug 2009 | WO |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20100064752 A1 | Mar 2010 | US |