The present invention relates to a closure for a closure-container combination having a peelable seal and that is sterilized using a retort process. The closure causes the seal to maintain a positive pressure against a container lip as the container undergoes sterilization by retort processing thereby minimizing the risk of leakage under the seal.
In recent years, packaged products which are room temperature storage stable yet ready-to-use upon opening, i.e. they require no cooking or heating before use, have become extremely popular with the consumer. For many food products, this trend requires only minor packaging changes, such as modifying the package size to be consistent with the anticipated consumer use pattern. However, for products prone to bacterial contamination and spoilage, such as milk-based beverages, soups, and many other low acid food products, this trend presents some major packaging challenges.
For example, milk-based and low acid food products need to be sterilized to reduce the initial viable bacterial concentration in a product, thereby reducing the rate at which the product will spoil and lengthening the product's shelf-life. One procedure for reducing the viable bacterial concentration is sterilization by retort processing. In the retort process, a chilled or ambient temperature product is poured into a container and the container is sealed. The container may be sealed by melding two sections of the container material together, such as by heat-sealing a seam on a pouch, or the container may be sealed by bonding a seal to the lip of the container, such as by induction sealing a foil-lined seal to a barrier polymer material bottle neck. The filled package is then sterilized at high temperature in a high pressure water bath. In a typical commercial production rate retort process, the package is heated from an ambient temperature of about 75° F. to a sterilizing temperature in the range of from about 212° F. to about 270° F. As the exterior surface of the package is heated, the package contents are heated and the internal (vapor) pressure increases. By concurrently, submerging the package in the water bath, a counteracting external pressure increase is applied to the container. Although the retort process is an efficient sterilization process, it is harsh on packaging materials because of the temperature and pressure variations involved. Materials commonly used for stand-up, reclosable containers, such as plastic bottles, tend to soften and distort during retort processing. Materials used for seals can soften and, because the seal material is distinct from the container material, can form small gaps or pinholes at the bond interface. These gaps or pinholes can allow product to vent out of the container as the internal pressure increases during the retort process and can allow process bath water to enter the container as the internal pressure decreases relative to the external pressure and the package returns to ambient conditions. Because the packaged beverage and the process water may pass through very small gaps at the bond interface, this event may occur even though the product appears to have an acceptable seal. Moreover, the container and seal may enter the retort process in a less than ideal condition because the process to adhere the seal to the container can cause the neck, the lip, the threads or a combination thereof on the container to distort slightly. If the seal is transferred to the neck with a closure mounted on the container, the skirt, top, threads or a combination thereof on the closure may distort during the seal transfer process. These material failures can increase the number of manufacturing errors and can allow for product contamination even on packages that appear to meet quality standards.
Barrier pouches minimize the risk of material failures during retort processing because the pouch usually has sufficient flexibility that it can alter its shape in response to the over-pressure conditions of the retort process. Moreover, barrier pouches generally have minimal headspace within the sealed pouch so the packages are less affected by the external pressure changes than are packages with relative large headspaces, such as semi-rigid bottle-like containers. Further, the seals or bonds are created by melding the pouch material to itself thereby creating strong, non-distinct bonds. Hence, well-sealed packages which are not dependent on maintaining their original shape can be produced. However, the pouches usually require specialized devices, such as sharp-tipped straws, to open the package and do not allow the consumer to reclose the package after opening.
For bottles or similar stand-up containers that are sealed such that the seal can withstand the retort process, a different problem may be created. The seal may adhere so tightly to the container lip that when the consumer attempts to remove the seal, the seal may be very difficult to remove from the container, and/or may tear into small pieces and leave fragments along the container rim. If the product is a beverage or similar liquid product, the product may settle under the seal fragments as the beverage is dispensed. This can make the product aesthetically unacceptable and unpleasant for repeated use by the consumer and increase the probability of bacterial contamination under the seal fragments. Further, the user risks being cut or scratched by the remaining foil bits along the container lip. Semi-rigid containers also have relatively large headspaces thereby allowing the user to shake and remix the product immediately before dispensing. However, during retort processing, the air-filled headspace will be affected more rapidly than the liquid product by the temperature changes increasing the pressure against the seal and thereby increasing the probability of seal failure.
The present invention is for a closure for a container that has a peelable seal wherein the sealed container is sterilized using a retort process. The closure provides a means for maintaining an effective pressure against the seal to prevent seal separation or leakage as the sealed container is subjected to the temperature and pressure deviations of the retort process.
Specifically, the closure includes a resilient liner and a skirt with at least one thread affixed to the skirt interior surface. The liner fits firmly within the closure, defines a resting thickness “t” at ambient temperature and pressure conditions, and is made from a material capable of being compressed to a thickness less than the resting thickness “t” and of recovering to a thickness sufficient to maintain an effective pressure between the closure and the peelable seal affixed to the container. In an embodiment of the present invention, the liner is made from a material capable of being compressed to a thickness less than the resting thickness “t” and of recovering to a thickness not greater than the resting thickness “t”. In an alternative embodiment of the present invention, the liner is made from a material capable of being compressed to a thickness less than the resting thickness “t” and of recovering to a thickness which may be greater than the resting thickness “t”. Also, in an embodiment of the present invention, the thread defines an angle θ between the upper edge and a horizontal plane and the angle θ is less than about 45°.
More specifically, the closure includes a top wall and an annular skirt depending from said top wall, a retaining structure extending radially inward from an inner surface of the annular skirt, a reseal structure or layer disposed above the retaining structure and adjacent the top wall of the closure wherein the reseal structure may have at least one slip layer on an upper surface, a lower surface, or both. The closure further comprises an inner seal positioned above the retaining structure abutting a lower surface of said reseal structure. The reseal structure may be formed of rubber and synthetic olefin rubber and the slip layer may be formed of a smooth, low friction polymeric material such as polypropylene. The retaining structure may be a bead, continuous or interrupted, or a thread. The slip layer may further include a lubricant or the reseal structure may be integral with the closure and the closure may comprise a lubricant.
The present invention is for a closure for a container that has a peelable seal wherein the sealed container is sterilized using a retort process. The closure provides a means for maintaining an effective pressure against the seal to prevent seal separation or leakage as the sealed container is subjected to the temperature and pressure deviations of the retort process. The closure and container depicted in the various Figures is selected solely for the purpose of illustrating the invention. Other and different closures, containers, or combinations thereof, may utilize the inventive features described herein as well.
Reference is first made to
The liner 40 abuts the top interior surface 23 of the cap 20 and is sized to fit firmly within the cap 20, i.e., the diameter of the liner 40 is large enough that the liner 40 can be held within the cap 20 by the thread 26 without the need for a bonding material. Optionally, as shown in
The closure 10 is designed to function cooperatively with the container 60 having the removable seal 80. As shown in
The seal 80 has a top face 82 and a container face 84. The seal 80 is reversibly affixed to the container lip 68, and preferably, is affixed to the lip 68 such that the seal 80 can be completely removed from the lip 68 by the user without tearing, shredding or leaving consumer noticeable fragments on the container lip 68. As is known in the art, the seal 80 may be proportioned to match the periphery 69 of the container neck 62, or it may be proportioned to extend beyond the periphery 69 thereby partially covering the exterior face of the neck 62, or it may be proportioned to match the periphery 69 in some sections and to extend beyond the periphery 69 at other sections, such as by including one or more tabs 86. The seal 80 preferably has sufficient strength and elasticity to allow the seal 80 to conform to the container lip 68 while accommodating any distortions, such as molding nubs or small voids or divots, and to expand and contract in the retort process without rupturing. Further, the seal 80 preferably can be adhered to the container lip 68 to form a semi-permanent bond between the seal 80 and container 60.
In the embodiment shown in
As shown in
During the retort process, the liner 40 functions cooperatively with the cap 20 to provide a pressure against the seal 80 opposing the container lip 68. Specifically, when the closure 10 is attached to the sealed container 60 at ambient temperature and pressure conditions, the cap 20 may be tightened on the container 60 such that the liner 40 is compressed slightly between the container lip 68 and the top interior surface 23 of the cap 20. A sealing zone 46, shown in
During the retort process, the angle θ of the cap and closure threads 26, 70 functions to hold the closure 10 on the container 60. Because of the pressure changes in the container associated with the retort process, the container may be distorted, and the distortion can affect the interaction of the container threads 70 with the cap threads 26. Threads with an essentially horizontal angle θ are stronger than threads having a larger angle θ. As the thread strength increases, the probability of the threads stripping and loosening decreases. Thus, because the threads of the closure 10 have a relatively small angle θ, the closure 10 is held securely on the container 60 and the liner 40 is held against the seal 80.
The closure 10 may remain on the container 60 until removed by the consumer. Optionally, the closure 10 may be removed from the container 60, the exterior surface of the neck 63 may be dried, for example with heated air, and a commercial closure may be applied. The commercial closure may be essentially identical to the closure 10, it may include tamper-evident features, or it may include other consumer-desired or aesthetic features, as are known in the art. However, small droplets of water can migrate under pressure from the water-bath into any void spaces that are present between the container 60 and the closure 10 during the retort process. Thus, if the closure 10 is to remain on the container 60 after processing, the closure 10 is preferably adapted to allow water to drain from spaces between the closure 10 and the container 60.
As shown in
A second alternative embodiment 210 of a closure with a tamper-evident band 234 is shown in
As described in the embodiments of
Referring now to
Referring again to
Referring again to
Referring still to
Referring now to
In operation, the reseal layer 440 and inner seal 480 are snapped into place above the retaining structure 450 of the closure 410 so that the liner 440 and seal 480 can rotate freely within the closure 410. Once in place, the closure 410 is rotationally applied to a container neck and moves linearly downward along the neck. As the inner seal 480 engages the container neck, the seal grips the container neck. The slip layer 442 which abuts the stepped portion 413 of the roof of the closure 410 allows the closure to continue to rotate without gripping the reseal layer 440 and without placing damaging torque on the reseal layer 440 or the inner seal 480. In other words, the inner seal 480 has a coefficient of friction greater than slip layer 442. Thus, the reseal layer 440 stops rotating with the closure because the inner seal 480 stops rotating when it engages the container rim. After the closure 410 is positioned on the container neck, the container and closure are moved through an induction welding or other such heat welding process to seal the container. Next, the sealed container may go through a thermal sterilization or retort process and cooling bath.
When the container is initially opened by a consumer, the inner seal 480 is removed from the container rim. Upon replacement of the closure 410 on the container neck, the lower surface of the reseal layer 440 encounters the container rim and the tacky surface of the reseal layer 440 grabs the container rim, inhibiting rotation and preventing the reseal layer 440 from being damaged by the imperfections in the container rim. In addition, the slip layer 442 on the upper surface of the reseal layer 440 allows the closure 410 to rotate while the reseal layer 440 stops on the container rim. This inhibits transmission of damaging torque to the reseal layer 440. In other words, the coefficient of friction of the lower surface of the reseal layer 440 is greater than the coefficient of friction of the slip layer 442. Thus, only a downward force is placed on the reseal layer 440.
From a reading of the above, one of ordinary skill in the art should be able to devise variations to the inventive features described herein. These and other variations are believed to fall within the spirit and scope of the attached claims.
This application is a continuation of and claims priority to and benefit from, currently, U.S. patent application Ser. No. 10/628,599, filed on Jul. 28, 2003, which will be issued as U.S. Pat. No. 7,168,581 on Jan. 30, 2007. Ser. No. 10/628,599 is a continuation-in-part of and claims priority to and benefit from, currently pending, U.S. patent application Ser. No. 10/026,161, filed on Dec. 21, 2001, which is incorporated by reference.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
1346112 | Bruns | Jul 1920 | A |
1556020 | Noll | Oct 1925 | A |
1910913 | Conner | May 1933 | A |
1916977 | Gutmann | Jul 1933 | A |
1937492 | Merolle | Nov 1933 | A |
1961033 | Bicks | May 1934 | A |
1995350 | Hoag | Mar 1935 | A |
2039757 | Von Till | May 1936 | A |
2085934 | Von Till | Jul 1937 | A |
2188946 | Gutmann | Feb 1940 | A |
2242256 | McManus | May 1941 | A |
2312513 | Wilson | Mar 1943 | A |
2620939 | Weisgerber | Dec 1952 | A |
2643021 | Freedman | Jun 1953 | A |
2670869 | Martin | Mar 1954 | A |
2681742 | Miller | Jun 1954 | A |
2686606 | Froitzheim | Aug 1954 | A |
2686607 | Zander | Aug 1954 | A |
2748969 | Leary | Jun 1956 | A |
2904837 | Crabbe | Sep 1959 | A |
2929525 | Glover | Mar 1960 | A |
3143364 | Klein | Aug 1964 | A |
3169656 | Wieckmann | Feb 1965 | A |
3186209 | Friedman | Jun 1965 | A |
3189209 | Owens | Jun 1965 | A |
3224617 | Hohl | Dec 1965 | A |
3245857 | Rutledge | Apr 1966 | A |
3255907 | Eddy | Jun 1966 | A |
3266658 | Meissner | Aug 1966 | A |
3331523 | Exton | Jul 1967 | A |
3360149 | Roth | Dec 1967 | A |
3501042 | Risch | Mar 1970 | A |
3527372 | Manning | Sep 1970 | A |
3530917 | Donovan | Sep 1970 | A |
3547294 | Williams | Dec 1970 | A |
3612325 | Williams | Oct 1971 | A |
3632004 | Grimes | Jan 1972 | A |
3788510 | Collins | Jan 1974 | A |
3815314 | Pollock et al. | Jun 1974 | A |
3823182 | Nonaka et al. | Jul 1974 | A |
3845525 | Gaylord | Nov 1974 | A |
3879492 | Botinick | Apr 1975 | A |
3910410 | Shaw | Oct 1975 | A |
3917100 | Dukess | Nov 1975 | A |
3923179 | Choksi | Dec 1975 | A |
3923182 | Choksi | Dec 1975 | A |
3923183 | Choksi | Dec 1975 | A |
3923184 | Choksi | Dec 1975 | A |
3923185 | Choksi | Dec 1975 | A |
3944103 | Cros | Mar 1976 | A |
3980194 | Costa | Sep 1976 | A |
4007848 | Snyder | Feb 1977 | A |
4009793 | Minesinger et al. | Mar 1977 | A |
4013188 | Ray | Mar 1977 | A |
4066181 | Robinson et al. | Jan 1978 | A |
4076152 | Mumford | Feb 1978 | A |
4091949 | Fowles et al. | May 1978 | A |
4093093 | Fowles et al. | Jun 1978 | A |
4109815 | Collins, III | Aug 1978 | A |
4128184 | Northup | Dec 1978 | A |
4151924 | Jameson | May 1979 | A |
4181232 | Bellamy et al. | Jan 1980 | A |
4204604 | Morin et al. | May 1980 | A |
4207990 | Weiler et al. | Jun 1980 | A |
4209126 | Elias | Jun 1980 | A |
4266687 | Cummings | May 1981 | A |
4275817 | Patton | Jun 1981 | A |
4276989 | Hicks | Jul 1981 | A |
4280653 | Elias | Jul 1981 | A |
4358919 | Hirota et al. | Nov 1982 | A |
4364485 | Knapp | Dec 1982 | A |
4369889 | Ostrowsky | Jan 1983 | A |
4378894 | Willis et al. | Apr 1983 | A |
4381840 | Ostrowsky | May 1983 | A |
4382521 | Ostrowsky | May 1983 | A |
4392579 | Uhlig et al. | Jul 1983 | A |
4423821 | McIntosh | Jan 1984 | A |
4427126 | Ostrowsky | Jan 1984 | A |
4430288 | Bonis | Feb 1984 | A |
4434904 | D'Amico et al. | Mar 1984 | A |
4457440 | Dukess | Jul 1984 | A |
4473163 | Geiger | Sep 1984 | A |
4493427 | Wolkonsky | Jan 1985 | A |
4496674 | Ehrhart et al. | Jan 1985 | A |
4501371 | Smalley | Feb 1985 | A |
4526279 | Weiler et al. | Jul 1985 | A |
4527705 | Prades | Jul 1985 | A |
4564117 | Herbert | Jan 1986 | A |
4576297 | Larson | Mar 1986 | A |
4583665 | Barriac | Apr 1986 | A |
4588099 | Diez | May 1986 | A |
4625875 | Carr et al. | Dec 1986 | A |
4637519 | Dutt et al. | Jan 1987 | A |
4638913 | Howe, Jr. | Jan 1987 | A |
4643330 | Kennedy | Feb 1987 | A |
4648520 | Stull | Mar 1987 | A |
4651886 | Stull | Mar 1987 | A |
4662529 | Moore | May 1987 | A |
4668458 | Whitney | May 1987 | A |
4674642 | Towns et al. | Jun 1987 | A |
4674643 | Wilde et al. | Jun 1987 | A |
4682463 | Foldesi | Jul 1987 | A |
4683016 | Dutt et al. | Jul 1987 | A |
4704180 | Marsella et al. | Nov 1987 | A |
4705188 | Rahn | Nov 1987 | A |
4706835 | Kreiseder | Nov 1987 | A |
4709815 | Price et al. | Dec 1987 | A |
4721215 | Bertaud | Jan 1988 | A |
4722447 | Crisci | Feb 1988 | A |
4723685 | Fillmore et al. | Feb 1988 | A |
4730748 | Bane | Mar 1988 | A |
4738370 | Urmston et al. | Apr 1988 | A |
4747500 | Gach et al. | May 1988 | A |
4747502 | Luenser | May 1988 | A |
4754890 | Ullman et al. | Jul 1988 | A |
4754892 | Retief | Jul 1988 | A |
4757914 | Roth et al. | Jul 1988 | A |
4764403 | Ajmera | Aug 1988 | A |
4778698 | Ou-Yang | Oct 1988 | A |
4779750 | Armstrong | Oct 1988 | A |
4782968 | Hayes | Nov 1988 | A |
4801037 | Hayashida et al. | Jan 1989 | A |
4807745 | Langley et al. | Feb 1989 | A |
4807770 | Barriac | Feb 1989 | A |
4809858 | Ochs | Mar 1989 | A |
4810541 | Newman et al. | Mar 1989 | A |
4815617 | Cullum | Mar 1989 | A |
4818577 | Ou-Yang | Apr 1989 | A |
4842951 | Yamada et al. | Jun 1989 | A |
4846359 | Baird et al. | Jul 1989 | A |
4875594 | Ochs | Oct 1989 | A |
4879147 | Newman et al. | Nov 1989 | A |
4881649 | Hsu et al. | Nov 1989 | A |
4892911 | Genske | Jan 1990 | A |
4893718 | Delespaul et al. | Jan 1990 | A |
4894266 | Bauer et al. | Jan 1990 | A |
4896783 | Leoncavallo et al. | Jan 1990 | A |
4935273 | Ou-Yang | Jun 1990 | A |
4981229 | Lanham | Jan 1991 | A |
4981230 | Marshall et al. | Jan 1991 | A |
4991731 | Osip et al. | Feb 1991 | A |
4997097 | Krautkramer | Mar 1991 | A |
5002811 | Bauer et al. | Mar 1991 | A |
5006384 | Genske | Apr 1991 | A |
5007546 | Rose et al. | Apr 1991 | A |
5009323 | Montgomery et al. | Apr 1991 | A |
5009324 | Ochs | Apr 1991 | A |
5011719 | Gehrke et al. | Apr 1991 | A |
5012946 | McCarthy | May 1991 | A |
5023121 | Pockat et al. | Jun 1991 | A |
5031787 | Ochs | Jul 1991 | A |
5058755 | Hayes | Oct 1991 | A |
5061532 | Yamada | Oct 1991 | A |
5069355 | Matuszak | Dec 1991 | A |
5071686 | Genske et al. | Dec 1991 | A |
5078290 | Ochs | Jan 1992 | A |
5092469 | Takata et al. | Mar 1992 | A |
5093164 | Bauer et al. | Mar 1992 | A |
5110642 | Genske | May 1992 | A |
5120787 | Drasner | Jun 1992 | A |
5135125 | Andel et al. | Aug 1992 | A |
5151317 | Bothe | Sep 1992 | A |
5160767 | Genske et al. | Nov 1992 | A |
5175035 | Pinsolle et al. | Dec 1992 | A |
5176271 | Painchaud et al. | Jan 1993 | A |
5178293 | Suzuki et al. | Jan 1993 | A |
5197618 | Goth | Mar 1993 | A |
5197620 | Gregory | Mar 1993 | A |
5197621 | Bartl et al. | Mar 1993 | A |
5255813 | Berggren et al. | Oct 1993 | A |
5258191 | Hayes | Nov 1993 | A |
5259522 | Morton | Nov 1993 | A |
5265745 | Pereyra et al. | Nov 1993 | A |
5302442 | O'Brien et al. | Apr 1994 | A |
5342684 | Carespodi | Aug 1994 | A |
5346082 | Ochs et al. | Sep 1994 | A |
5381913 | Peeters | Jan 1995 | A |
5407751 | Genske et al. | Apr 1995 | A |
5415306 | Luch et al. | May 1995 | A |
5421470 | Dudzik | Jun 1995 | A |
5433992 | Galda et al. | Jul 1995 | A |
5447792 | Brandt et al. | Sep 1995 | A |
5469968 | Matthews et al. | Nov 1995 | A |
5492757 | Schuhmann et al. | Feb 1996 | A |
5500265 | Ambroise et al. | Mar 1996 | A |
5513781 | Ullrich et al. | May 1996 | A |
5523136 | Fischer et al. | Jun 1996 | A |
5533622 | Stockley, III et al. | Jul 1996 | A |
5551608 | Moore et al. | Sep 1996 | A |
5615789 | Finkelstein et al. | Apr 1997 | A |
5626929 | Stevenson | May 1997 | A |
5664694 | Bietzer et al. | Sep 1997 | A |
5685443 | Taber et al. | Nov 1997 | A |
5702015 | Giles et al. | Dec 1997 | A |
5720401 | Moore | Feb 1998 | A |
5723507 | Markovich et al. | Mar 1998 | A |
5738231 | Montgomery | Apr 1998 | A |
5756178 | Obadia | May 1998 | A |
5773136 | Alder et al. | Jun 1998 | A |
5785195 | Zwemer et al. | Jul 1998 | A |
5788101 | King | Aug 1998 | A |
5837369 | Grunberger et al. | Nov 1998 | A |
5850951 | Hayes | Dec 1998 | A |
5851640 | Schuhmann et al. | Dec 1998 | A |
5860544 | Brucker | Jan 1999 | A |
5862928 | Breuer et al. | Jan 1999 | A |
5875909 | Guglielmini | Mar 1999 | A |
5882789 | Jones et al. | Mar 1999 | A |
5884788 | Wilde | Mar 1999 | A |
5902075 | Krings | May 1999 | A |
5915577 | Levine | Jun 1999 | A |
5925430 | Bayer et al. | Jul 1999 | A |
5927530 | Moore | Jul 1999 | A |
5929128 | Whetten et al. | Jul 1999 | A |
5947311 | Gregory | Sep 1999 | A |
5973077 | Kan et al. | Oct 1999 | A |
5992661 | Zumbuhl | Nov 1999 | A |
5997968 | Dries et al. | Dec 1999 | A |
6006930 | Dreyer et al. | Dec 1999 | A |
6044994 | Miller | Apr 2000 | A |
6056136 | Taber et al. | May 2000 | A |
6056141 | Navarini et al. | May 2000 | A |
6068933 | Shepard et al. | May 2000 | A |
6082566 | Yousif et al. | Jul 2000 | A |
6082568 | Flanagan | Jul 2000 | A |
6089390 | Druitt et al. | Jul 2000 | A |
6105800 | Czesak | Aug 2000 | A |
6119422 | Clear et al. | Sep 2000 | A |
6119883 | Hock et al. | Sep 2000 | A |
6123212 | Russell et al. | Sep 2000 | A |
6152316 | Niese | Nov 2000 | A |
6152319 | Kamachi et al. | Nov 2000 | A |
6158604 | Larguia, Sr. et al. | Dec 2000 | A |
6165576 | Freedman et al. | Dec 2000 | A |
6179139 | Heilman | Jan 2001 | B1 |
6202871 | Kelly | Mar 2001 | B1 |
6206871 | Zanon et al. | Mar 2001 | B1 |
6220466 | Hayes et al. | Apr 2001 | B1 |
6231975 | Kong et al. | May 2001 | B1 |
6234338 | Searle | May 2001 | B1 |
6235822 | Whetten et al. | May 2001 | B1 |
6237789 | Zhu | May 2001 | B1 |
6239210 | Kim et al. | May 2001 | B1 |
6253939 | Wan et al. | Jul 2001 | B1 |
6253940 | Graham et al. | Jul 2001 | B1 |
6257430 | Rinnie et al. | Jul 2001 | B1 |
6265083 | Tanizaki et al. | Jul 2001 | B1 |
6276543 | German et al. | Aug 2001 | B1 |
6277478 | Kurita et al. | Aug 2001 | B1 |
6302321 | Reese et al. | Oct 2001 | B1 |
6315140 | Nadel | Nov 2001 | B1 |
6382443 | Gregory | May 2002 | B1 |
6382445 | McCandless | May 2002 | B1 |
6419101 | Hessel et al. | Jul 2002 | B1 |
6477823 | Kitterman et al. | Nov 2002 | B1 |
6488165 | Hidding | Dec 2002 | B1 |
6502710 | Bosl et al. | Jan 2003 | B1 |
6659297 | Gregory et al. | Dec 2003 | B2 |
6848590 | Brozell et al. | Feb 2005 | B2 |
6854614 | Sprick | Feb 2005 | B2 |
6874647 | Bloom et al. | Apr 2005 | B2 |
6893672 | Ingraham | May 2005 | B2 |
6902075 | O'Brien et al. | Jun 2005 | B2 |
6913157 | Oh | Jul 2005 | B2 |
6948630 | Julian et al. | Sep 2005 | B2 |
7004340 | Belden, Jr. | Feb 2006 | B2 |
7021478 | Hock | Apr 2006 | B1 |
7168581 | Robinson et al. | Jan 2007 | B2 |
7175039 | German et al. | Feb 2007 | B2 |
7217454 | Smelko et al. | May 2007 | B2 |
20010012868 | Chen et al. | Aug 2001 | A1 |
20020027123 | Druitt et al. | Mar 2002 | A1 |
20020066713 | Ma | Jun 2002 | A1 |
20020162818 | Williams | Nov 2002 | A1 |
20030071007 | Ma et al. | Apr 2003 | A1 |
20030098285 | Gregory et al. | May 2003 | A1 |
20030116524 | Robinson et al. | Jun 2003 | A1 |
20030150833 | Shenkar | Aug 2003 | A1 |
20040055992 | Robinson et al. | Mar 2004 | A1 |
20040173944 | Mueller et al. | Sep 2004 | A1 |
20050003125 | Barber et al. | Jan 2005 | A1 |
20050211657 | Mallet et al. | Sep 2005 | A1 |
20050284837 | Taber et al. | Dec 2005 | A1 |
20070125785 | Robinson et al. | Jun 2007 | A1 |
20070138125 | Granger | Jun 2007 | A1 |
20070187352 | Kras et al. | Aug 2007 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
CA- 2572379 | Dec 2006 | CA |
DE- 3237634 | Apr 1984 | DE |
DE- 4206244 | Sep 1993 | DE |
EP- 0269920 | Jun 1988 | EP |
EP- 275102 | Jul 1988 | EP |
EP- 405365 | Jan 1991 | EP |
EP- 0421821 | Apr 1991 | EP |
EP- 589033 | Oct 1993 | EP |
GB- 2034288 | Jun 1980 | GB |
JP- 02205574 | Aug 1990 | JP |
JP- 02219769 | Sep 1990 | JP |
JP- 2000052982 | Feb 2000 | JP |
JP- 2001261054 | Sep 2001 | JP |
WO- 9009935 | Sep 1990 | WO |
WO- 2006002922 | Jan 2006 | WO |
WO- 2007042205 | Apr 2007 | WO |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20070125785 A1 | Jun 2007 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 10628599 | Jul 2003 | US |
Child | 11668211 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 10026161 | Dec 2001 | US |
Child | 10628599 | US |