The present invention relates to a closure for a closure container that has a peelable seal and that is sterilized using a retort process. The closure causes the seal to maintain a positive pressure against a container lip as the container undergoes sterilization by retort processing thereby minimizing the risk of leakage under the seal.
In recent years, packaged products which are room temperature storage stable yet ready-to-use upon opening, i.e. they require no cooking or heating before use, have become extremely popular with the consumer. For many food products, this trend requires only minor packaging changes, such as modifying the package size to be consistent with the anticipated consumer use pattern. However, for products prone to bacterial contamination and spoilage, such as milk-based beverages, soups, and many other low acid food products, this trend presents some major packaging challenges. For example, milk-based and low acid food products need to be sterilized to reduce the initial viable bacterial concentration in a product, thereby reducing the rate at which the product will spoil and lengthening the product's shelf-life. One procedure for reducing the viable bacterial concentration is sterilization by retort processing. In the retort process, a chilled or ambient temperature product is poured into a container and the container is sealed. The container may be sealed by melding two sections of the container material together, such as by heat-sealing a seam on a pouch, or the container may be sealed by bonding a seal to the lip of the container, such as by induction sealing a foil-lined seal to a barrier polymer material bottle neck. The filled package is then sterilized at high temperature in a high pressure water bath. In a typical commercial production rate retort process, the package is heated from an ambient temperature of about 75° F. to a sterilizing temperature in the range of from about 212° F. to about 270° F. As the exterior surface of the package is heated, the package contents are heated and the internal (vapor) pressure increases. By concurrently, submerging the package in the water bath, a counteracting external pressure increase is applied to the container.
Although the retort process is an efficient sterilization process, it is harsh on packaging materials because of the temperature and pressure variations involved. Materials commonly used for stand-up, reclosable containers, such as plastic bottles, tend to soften and distort during retort processing. Materials used for seals can soften and, because the seal material is distinct from the container material, can form small gaps or pinholes at the bond interface. These gaps or pinholes can allow product to vent out of the container as the internal pressure increases during the retort process and can allow process bath water to enter the container as the internal pressure decreases relative to the external pressure and the package returns to ambient conditions. Because the packaged beverage and the process water may pass through very small gaps at the bond interface, this event may occur even though the product appears to have an acceptable seal. Moreover, the container and seal may enter the retort process in a less than ideal condition because the process to adhere the seal to the container can cause the neck, the lip, the threads or a combination thereof on the container to distort slightly. If the seal is transferred to the neck with a closure mounted on the container, the skirt, top, threads or a combination thereof on the closure may distort during the seal transfer process. These material failures can increase the number of manufacturing errors and can allow for product contamination even on packages that appear to meet quality standards.
Barrier pouches minimize the risk of material failures during retort processing because the pouch usually has sufficient flexibility that it can alter its shape in response to the over-pressure conditions of the retort process. Moreover, barrier pouches generally have minimal headspace within the sealed pouch so the packages are less affected by the external pressure changes than are packages with relative large headspaces, such as semi-rigid bottle-like containers. Further, the seals or bonds are created by melding the pouch material to itself thereby creating strong, non-distinct bonds. Hence, well-sealed packages which are not dependent on maintaining their original shape can be produced. However, the pouches usually require specialized devices, such as sharp-tipped straws, to open the package and do not allow the consumer to reclose the package after opening.
For bottles or similar stand-up containers that are sealed such that the seal can withstand the retort process, a different problem may be created. The seal may adhere so tightly to the container lip that when the consumer attempts to remove the seal, the seal may be very difficult to remove from the container, and/or may tear into small pieces and leave fragments along the container rim. If the product is a beverage or similar liquid product, the product may settle under the seal fragments as the beverage is dispensed. This can make the product aesthetically unacceptable and unpleasant for repeated use by the consumer and increase the probability of bacterial contamination under the seal fragments. Further, the user risks being cut or scratched by the remaining foil bits along the container lip. Semi-rigid containers also have relatively large headspaces thereby allowing the user to shake and remix the product immediately before dispensing. However, during retort processing, the air-filled headspace will be affected more rapidly than the liquid product by the temperature changes increasing the pressure against the seal and thereby increasing the probability of seal failure.
The present invention is for a closure for a container that has a peelable seal wherein the sealed container is sterilized using a retort process. The closure provides a means for maintaining an effective pressure against the seal to prevent seal separation or leakage as the sealed container is subjected to the temperature and pressure deviations of the retort process.
Specifically, the closure includes a resilient liner and a skirt with at least one thread affixed to the skirt interior surface. The liner fits firmly within the closure, defines a resting thickness “t” at ambient temperature and pressure conditions, and is made from a material capable of being compressed to a thickness less than the resting thickness “t” and of recovering to a thickness sufficient to maintain an effective pressure between the closure and the peelable seal affixed to the container. In an embodiment of the present invention, the liner is made from a material capable of being compressed to a thickness less than the resting thickness “t” and of recovering to a thickness not greater than the resting thickness “t”. In an alternative embodiment of the present invention, the liner is made from a material capable of being compressed to a thickness less than the resting thickness “t” and of recovering to a thickness which may be greater than the resting thickness “t”. Also, in an embodiment of the present invention, the thread defines an angle θ between the upper edge and a horizontal plane and the angle θ is less than about 45°.
The present invention is for a closure for a container that has a peelable seal wherein the sealed container is sterilized using a retort process. The closure provides a means for maintaining an effective pressure against the seal to prevent seal separation or leakage as the sealed container is subjected to the temperature and pressure deviations of the retort process. The closure and container depicted in the various Figures is selected solely for the purpose of illustrating the invention. Other and different closures, containers, or combinations thereof, may utilize the inventive features described herein as well.
Reference is first made to
The liner 40 abuts the top interior surface 23 of the cap 20 and is sized to fit firmly within the cap 20, i.e., the diameter of the liner 40 is large enough that the liner 40 can be held within the cap 20 by the thread 26 without the need for a bonding material. Optionally, as shown in
The closure 10 is designed to function cooperatively with the container 60 having the removable seal 80. As shown in
The seal 80 has a top face 82 and a container face 84. The seal 80 is reversibly affixed to the container lip 68, and preferably, is affixed to the lip 68 such that the seal 80 can be completely removed from the lip 68 by the user without tearing, shredding or leaving consumer noticeable fragments on the container lip 68. As is known in the art, the seal 80 may be proportioned to match the periphery 69 of the container neck 62, or it may be proportioned to extend beyond the periphery 69 thereby partially covering the exterior face of the neck 62, or it may be proportioned to match the periphery 69 in some sections and to extend beyond the periphery 69 at other sections, such as by including one or more tabs 86. The seal 80 preferably has sufficient strength and elasticity to allow the seal 80 to conform to the container lip 68 while accommodating any distortions, such as molding nubs or small voids or divots, and to expand and contract in the retort process without rupturing. Further, the seal 80 preferably can be adhered to the container lip 68 to form a semi-permanent bond between the seal 80 and container 60.
In the embodiment shown in
As shown in
During the retort process, the liner 40 functions cooperatively with the cap 20 to provide a pressure against the seal 80 opposing the container lip 68. Specifically, when the closure 10 is attached to the sealed container 60 at ambient temperature and pressure conditions, the cap 20 may be tightened on the container 60 such that the liner 40 is compressed slightly between the container lip 68 and the top interior surface 23 of the cap 20. A sealing zone 46, shown in
During the retort process, the angle θ of the cap and closure threads 26, 70 functions to hold the closure 10 on the container 60. Because of the pressure changes in the container associated with the retort process, the container may be distorted, and the distortion can affect the interaction of the container threads 70 with the cap threads 26. Threads with an essentially horizontal angle θ are stronger than threads having a larger angle θ. As the thread strength increases, the probability of the threads stripping and loosening decreases. Thus, because the threads of the closure 10 have a relatively small angle θ, the closure 10 is held securely on the container 60 and the liner 40 is held against the seal 80.
The closure 10 may remain on the container 60 until removed by the consumer. Optionally, the closure 10 may be removed from the container 60, the exterior surface of the neck 63 may be dried, for example with heated air, and a commercial closure may be applied. The commercial closure may be essentially identical to the closure 10, it may include tamper-evident features, or it may include other consumer-desired or aesthetic features, as are known in the art. However, small droplets of water can migrate under pressure from the water-bath into any void spaces that are present between the container 60 and the closure 10 during the retort process. Thus, if the closure 10 is to remain on the container 60 after processing, the closure 10 is preferably adapted to allow water to drain from spaces between the closure 10 and the container 60.
As shown in
A second alternative embodiment 210 of a closure with a tamper-evident band 234 is shown in
As described in the embodiments of
From a reading of the above, one with ordinary skill in the art should be able to devise variations to the inventive features described herein. These and other variations are believed to fall within the spirit and scope of the attached claims.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
1916977 | Gutmann | Jul 1933 | A |
3879492 | Bontinick | Apr 1975 | A |
4280653 | Elias | Jul 1981 | A |
4358919 | Hirota et al. | Nov 1982 | A |
4392579 | Uhlig et al. | Jul 1983 | A |
4496674 | Ehrhart et al. | Jan 1985 | A |
4625875 | Carr et al. | Dec 1986 | A |
4638913 | Howe, Jr. | Jan 1987 | A |
4705188 | Rahn | Nov 1987 | A |
4722447 | Crisci | Feb 1988 | A |
4754890 | Ullman et al. | Jul 1988 | A |
4818577 | Ou-Yang | Apr 1989 | A |
4842951 | Yamada et al. | Jun 1989 | A |
4881649 | Hsu et al. | Nov 1989 | A |
4894266 | Bauer et al. | Jan 1990 | A |
4896783 | Leoncavallo et al. | Jan 1990 | A |
4935273 | Ou-Yang | Jun 1990 | A |
5002811 | Bauer et al. | Mar 1991 | A |
5006384 | Genske | Apr 1991 | A |
5009323 | Montgomery et al. | Apr 1991 | A |
5011719 | Gehrke et al. | Apr 1991 | A |
5023121 | Pockat et al. | Jun 1991 | A |
5061532 | Yamada | Oct 1991 | A |
5069355 | Matuszak | Dec 1991 | A |
5071686 | Genske et al. | Dec 1991 | A |
5092469 | Takata et al. | Mar 1992 | A |
5093164 | Bauer et al. | Mar 1992 | A |
5110642 | Genske | May 1992 | A |
5151317 | Bothe | Sep 1992 | A |
5160767 | Genske et al. | Nov 1992 | A |
5175035 | Pinsolle et al. | Dec 1992 | A |
5178293 | Suzuki et al. | Jan 1993 | A |
5302442 | O'Brien et al. | Apr 1994 | A |
5447792 | Brandt et al. | Sep 1995 | A |
5492757 | Schuhmann et al. | Feb 1996 | A |
5500265 | Ambroise et al. | Mar 1996 | A |
5533622 | Stockley, III et al. | Jul 1996 | A |
5626929 | Stevenson | May 1997 | A |
5723507 | Markovich et al. | Mar 1998 | A |
5773136 | Alder et al. | Jun 1998 | A |
5785195 | Zwemer et al. | Jul 1998 | A |
5837369 | Grunberger et al. | Nov 1998 | A |
5851640 | Schuhmann et al. | Dec 1998 | A |
5882789 | Jones et al. | Mar 1999 | A |
5925430 | Bayer et al. | Jul 1999 | A |
5973077 | Kan et al. | Oct 1999 | A |
5992661 | Zumbuhl | Nov 1999 | A |
5997968 | Dries et al. | Dec 1999 | A |
6202871 | Kelly | Mar 2001 | B1 |
6206871 | Zanon et al. | Mar 2001 | B1 |
6231975 | Kong et al. | May 2001 | B1 |
6235822 | Whetten et al. | May 2001 | B1 |
6265083 | Tanizaki et al. | Jul 2001 | B1 |
6276543 | German et al. | Aug 2001 | B1 |
6659297 | Gregory et al. | Dec 2003 | B2 |
20020162818 | Williams | Nov 2002 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
0 659 655 | Jun 1995 | EP |
2001261054 | Sep 2001 | JP |
WO 9009935 | Sep 1990 | WO |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20030116524 A1 | Jun 2003 | US |