The field of this invention is surface controlled subsurface safety valves and more particularly actuating mechanisms for the closure element.
Traditionally, sub-surface safety valves (SSSV) have had a flat or curved closure element known as a flapper, or a ball-shaped closure element, which rotates approximately 90 degrees, from opened to closed positions, under the bias of a closure spring generally mounted to the hinge holding the closure element to the valve body. The closure spring acts on the closure element after a flow tube or other actuating element is retracted. The flow tube and actuator mechanism are typically mounted above the closure element and inside the seat against which the closure element contacts for closure. The flow tube and actuator are biased in the uphole (closed) direction by a separate spring, commonly known as the power spring, and are driven down against the spring bias and into the closure element by pressure (or other appropriate signal) delivered through a control line extending to the SSSV from the surface. As long as control line pressure (or other appropriate signal) is applied to the actuator the power spring bias on the flow tube is overcome and the flow tube stays in a down (open) position. In the down position of the flow tube, the closure element is rotated against the bias of the closure spring, and away from contact with the mating seat. The closure element winds up behind or adjacent to the flow tube when the SSSV is open. If control line pressure (or signal) is lost, the power spring bias on the flow tube pushes it and the actuator mechanism uphole. This movement, in turn, allows the closure spring, acting on the closure element, to rotate the closure element on its hinge in an uphole direction until it makes contact with the mating seat.
Traditionally, the flow tube and the actuator mechanism have always been above the closure element. This required the bias (power) spring on the flow tube to support the weight and overcome friction of the flow tube as well as to bias it uphole to allow the closure element to shut. Since the flapper had to rotate 90 degrees in the uphole direction to close the SSSV, a hinge closure spring was always necessary to create that motion to overcome the weight of the flapper and apply a contact force to it to hold it against its mating seat. As a result of this configuration, the overall length of SSSVs was longer than it needed to be. In low pressure applications, there was concern about the ability of the closure spring on the flapper to apply a sufficient closing force against the mating seat to keep the SSSV closed. This concern also arose when there was sand, paraffin, asphaltine or other friction increasing compounds in the well fluids, creating doubt as to the available closure force on the flow tube from its power spring. If the flow tube gets stuck, the SSSV cannot close.
The present invention presents a unique design where the actuator mechanism is below the flapper. The power spring acts on a sleeve or rod operably connected to the flapper on an opposed side of the pivot mounting. The spring pushes the sleeve or rod downhole to rotate the flapper closed, upon loss of control line signal. The details and other features of the invention will become more readily apparent from a detailed review of the description of the preferred embodiment, which appears below.
A subsurface safety valve has a closure sleeve or rod mounted below the closure mechanism. Control signal pushes the sleeve up (uphole) or down (downhole), whichever is applicable, which causes the closure element to rotate (or slide, or otherwise translate) to its open position. A loss of control signal allows the closure spring to push the sleeve or rod downhole (or uphole, whichever is appropriate). This movement causes the closure element to be driven to its closed position against the seat.
Referring to
The arm 18 extending into the groove 20 can be replaced with a rack and pinion design, as shown in FIG. 3. Annular piston 22′ has teeth 34 which extend into contact with pinion 36. Pinion 36 is attached or made integral with the flapper 10. In each instance movement of the annular piston 22 or 22′ in opposed directions results in a desired 90 degree rotational movement of the flapper 10. The torsion spring for flapper closure in prior designs has been eliminated. In this design there is only one spring 24. Due to the orientation of the annular piston 22 below the flapper 10, the weight of the annular piston 22 adds to the closure force of spring 24 on flapper 10. Additionally using arm 18 extending into groove 20 or the rack and pinion connection shown in
Those skilled in the art will appreciate that the present invention allows SSVs to be made shorter and more economically. Fewer moving parts also imply increased reliability. The torsion spring, the flow tube, and the components linking the piston to the flow tube are eliminated. A single spring forcibly moves the flapper and the piston to the closed position. The closure spring 24 does not have to support the weight of the piston 22 or 38 when moving the flapper 10 to its closed position. Control line pressure or other signal moves the piston 22 or 38, either of which is linked directly to the flapper for application of a moment to rotate it to the open position. Those skilled in the art will appreciate that a variety of connections can be used between a piston mounted below the flapper and the flapper, as being contemplated by the invention. While direct contact, such as arm 32 extending into groove 20 is preferred, indirect contact is also envisioned. For example, an arrangement of components can be envisioned such that the piston is urged in the opposite direction as that described above. In this case, indirect contact between the arm (or sleeve) and the closure element may be appropriate.
Those skilled in the art will appreciate that the closure element can be a flapper, a ball, a sliding gate or any other device that effects closure. Reference to one type of closure element is intended to encompass any of the known alternative designs. The actuator can be linked to the closure member directly such as when the rack and pinion mechanism illustrated in
The full extent of the invention is delineated in the claims below.
This application claims the benefit of U.S. Provisional Application No. 60/334,321 filed on Nov. 30, 2001.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
2780290 | Natho | Feb 1957 | A |
2798561 | True | Jul 1957 | A |
3482603 | Outcalt | Dec 1969 | A |
3817278 | Elliott | Jun 1974 | A |
3830306 | Brown | Aug 1974 | A |
3958633 | Britch et al. | May 1976 | A |
3980135 | Garrett | Sep 1976 | A |
4019532 | Schittek | Apr 1977 | A |
4168772 | Eberle | Sep 1979 | A |
4407325 | Chernik | Oct 1983 | A |
4422618 | Lawson | Dec 1983 | A |
4503913 | Carmody | Mar 1985 | A |
4531587 | Fineberg | Jul 1985 | A |
4585026 | Norton | Apr 1986 | A |
4669500 | Strelow | Jun 1987 | A |
4782895 | Jacob et al. | Nov 1988 | A |
5137090 | Hare et al. | Aug 1992 | A |
5145005 | Dollison | Sep 1992 | A |
5156374 | Fort et al. | Oct 1992 | A |
5159981 | Le | Nov 1992 | A |
5201371 | Allen | Apr 1993 | A |
5310005 | Dollison | May 1994 | A |
5411056 | Solaroli | May 1995 | A |
5564502 | Crow et al. | Oct 1996 | A |
5794655 | Funderburk et al. | Aug 1998 | A |
6003605 | Dickson et al. | Dec 1999 | A |
6199381 | Unger et al. | Mar 2001 | B1 |
6227299 | Dennistoun | May 2001 | B1 |
6253843 | Rawson et al. | Jul 2001 | B1 |
6269874 | Rawson et al. | Aug 2001 | B1 |
6328062 | Williams et al. | Dec 2001 | B1 |
20030178199 | Deaton | Sep 2003 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
1308954 | Mar 1973 | GB |
1563487 | Mar 1980 | GB |
2198170 | Jun 1988 | GB |
2236549 | Apr 1991 | GB |
WO 8605853 | Oct 1986 | WO |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20030121665 A1 | Jul 2003 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
60334321 | Nov 2001 | US |