Not Applicable.
Not applicable.
Not applicable.
This invention relates generally to vented plastic food containers. The invention is more specifically related to venting mechanisms for disposable tamper evident plastic food containers.
It is known to use plastic containers in the food preparation and restaurant industry to package prepared foods. The typical food container of the prior art consists of a clear or solid colored base and a clear lid. In order to maintain the quality of food contents and prevent tampering with the contents of a sealed container, it is desirable that the food container, once initially sealed, not be capable of being initially opened without visible indication of the container having been opened. To achieve this feature, container manufacturers have designed containers having integral tamper evident features. Typically, these containers consist of a lid that is hingedly attached to a base. The lid seals to the base by superposing the rim of the lid upon the rim of the base. These types of plastic containers are sold as one-piece containers and are often referred to as “clamshell” containers or packages.
Some manufacturers of tamper evident clamshell containers have incorporated tamper evident features as part of the structure that forms or includes the hinge. In these containers, the container is designed to require a severance near the hinge in order to unseal (initially open) the container. This construct make the hinge a single use hinge. One example of a container with a tamper evident hinge structure is shown in U.S. Pat. No. 9,580,219 (Cimmerer, et al).
One deficit of the prior art tamper evident container lies in the fact that they are not adapted to hold warm foods or cut produce that create internal vapor or gas (collectively referred to herein as “vapor” pressure). In fact, if the container is not vented properly, the buildup of pressure in a sealed container can overcome the force of the container's rim engagement and cause the container to pop open, thereby defeating its tamper evident quality. On the other hand, one cannot simply utilize the common venting techniques used with standard containers on a tamper evident container. In this respect, in the food packaging industry it is known to provide apertures or slits in the top surface of a plastic container for purposes of venting the container. However, adding such vents to a tamper evident container provides access ports into the container that defeat the purpose of the tamper evident structures of the container. Holes and slits in the container top surface also permit the leakage or spillage of food contents should the container turn over. They also allow the ingress of bacteria into the container.
It is also known in the food packaging industry to provide venting structures in the engaging rims of the container so as to allow for venting through the rims of the container. An example of a container with such structures is disclosed in U.S. Pat. No. 8,875,927 (Pohlman, et al). The venting mechanism of the container of Pohlman is built into the rim-engaging surfaces of the lid and base rims and utilizes internal vapor pressure to cause at least one of the rims to move slightly relative to the other to create a venting path through the rims when the container is under pressure. The known through-the-rim venting solutions, however, do not work with prior art tamper evident containers because the lid rims and base rims of such containers are designed to strongly and immovably engage when the container is sealed. Hence, the rims, once engaged, do not allow for a secondary venting movement vis-à-vis each other once the container is sealed. This is because these rigid rim engagement designs prevent opening of the containers via any technique other than through deployment of the opening mechanism built into the container. Providing for through-the-rim venting around the periphery of the container could therefore focally weaken the frictional engagement of the lid and base rims and thereby circumvent the need to use the provided-for opening mechanism. Also, providing vent channels in the accessible rims could provide possible leverage or insertion points at which to insert a slender tool or object through the rims of the container,
There is thus a need in the art for a tamper evident plastic food container that allows for the elimination of excess vapor pressure yet allows the container to retain its tamper evident functionality.
The present invention satisfies the need in the art and provides an aesthetically appealing food container that is easy to use, while allowing for removal of excessive steam pressure from a tamper evident container that employs a container opening mechanism in the container's hinge-forming structure. In this respect, the present invention plastic food container comprises a lid adapted for sealing with a base. The lid has a perimeter rim structure that complementarily engages the rim structure of the base to achieve a substantially leak-proof seal via the mating of the lid and base rim structures at certain zones, referred to herein as seal zones.
In particular, a preferred embodiment of the present invention food container is capable of assuming a loading state and an initially sealed state. The container comprises a base and a lid. The base has a base rim peripherally encompassing the base and the lid has a lid rim peripherally encompassing the lid. Hinge-forming structure extends from a first hinge-joining section of the lid rim to a second hinge-joining section on the base rim. In the initially sealed state the first hinge-joining section superposes over all or part of the second hinge-joining section. The area of the container at which the first hinge-joining-section superposes the second hinge-joining section defines an overlapping portion of the first and second hinge-joining sections. For brevity's sake this overlapping portion of the first hinge-joining section and the second hinge-joining section is referred to herein as the “overlapping portion.”
In the initially sealed state the base rim and lid rim frictionally engage each other such that they form one or more proximal seal zones. One or more vent channels are formed in either of the lid rim or base rim and located within the overlapping portion. When the container is in the sealed state, the one or more channels form a complete discontinuity in the one or more proximal seal zones. To ensure tamper evidence, the plastic food container should not have any vents outside of the overlapping area. Additionally, in a preferred embodiment, when the container is in the initially sealed state, the base rim and lid rim frictionally engage each other such that they form a first distal seal zone in the engaged rim structure. The one or more channels each form a partial discontinuity in this first distal seal zone. When the embodiment container is constructed in the fashion described above, the lid of the container remains engaged to the base, but allows the egress of gases and vapors inside the initially sealed container through the one or more vent channels upon the pressure in the sealed container reaching a certain level without manually repositioning of the lid on the base.
In the preferred embodiment container the lid rim has a lid retaining bead. The lid retaining bead has a peripherally projecting bottom segment, a peripherally projecting lid rim flange and an outer vertically oriented segment disposed between the peripherally projecting horizontal segment and the peripherally projecting lid rim flange. The base rim has a base retaining bead. The base retaining bead has a peripherally projecting platform segment, a peripherally projecting top segment and an inner vertical wall disposed between the peripherally projecting platform segment and the peripherally projecting top segment. In the initially sealed state the base rim and lid rim frictionally engage each other such that the peripherally projecting bottom segment of the lid rim and peripherally projecting platform segment of the base rim contact each other and form a first proximal seal zone. Additionally, in the initially sealed state the outer vertically oriented segment of the lid rim and the inner vertical wall of the base rim contact each other and form a second proximal seal zone. When the container is in the sealed state, the one or more channels found within the overlapping portion form a complete discontinuity in the first proximal seal zone and in the second proximal seal zone. In a more preferred embodiment of the container, when it is in the initially sealed state the base rim and lid rim frictionally engage each other such that the peripherally projecting lid rim flange of the lid rim and the peripherally projecting top segment of the base rim contact each other and form a first distal seal zone. The one or more channels found within the overlapping portion each form a partial discontinuity in the first distal seal zone.
As just described, the one or more vent channels are formed in either or both of the lid rim and base rim structures so as to create areas of discontinuity in the seal zones. These areas of discontinuity serve as channels in which pressurized vapor may travel out from the container and through the engaged rims of the sealed container. The channels are confined to the overlapping portion of the container, which in more specific detail is located in the area of the engaged rims proximate the hinge-forming structure and which are within the endpoints of both the first hinge-joining section and the second hinge-joining section. Preferably, these vent channels are located at a distance inboard from those endpoints such that they are not directly accessible by finger or implement. When the channels are so limitedly located, they are protected from access and manipulation by the hinge-forming structure of the container. Thus, pressurized vapor is emitted through the rims of the container and into the empty hinge space defined by the hinge-forming structure of the container. An initially sealed container thus fully retains its tamper evidence, but also allows for venting.
A preferred embodiment container 1 of the present invention in the initially sealed state and loading state is shown in
The container includes hinge-forming structure 40 that includes an opening mechanism 45 which an end user will use to open the container from the initially sealed state. In the case of the shown preferred embodiment container, the opening mechanism 45 is representatively shown to be that as depicted in U.S. Pat. No. 9,580,219 (Cimmerer, et al). This is merely exemplary as the invention described herein will work with containers using other opening mechanisms that are located in hinge-forming structure. When the opening mechanism 45 for the initially sealed container has been utilized, the container is then in a ready-to-open state. When the lid is separated from the base from this ready-to-open state, the container is in an opened state.
As shown by these figures, container 1 includes lid 2 and base 3. Lid 2 includes cover portion 33, which extends outwardly to form inner wall 18 of preferred embodiment multi-segment rim 4. Rim 4 preferably includes a bead formed from inner vertical wall 18, outer vertical wall 19 and peripherally projecting bottom segment 20 disposed in between inner wall 18 and outer wall 19. Lid 2 and base 3 are manufactured from a conventional plastic material. Lid 2 is preferably clear. Cover portion 33 may be flat or domed and may include cover bead 34 in accordance with the prior art to enhance such factors as restricting access to lid rim flange 9 and stacking of sealed containers. Base 3 has a base rim 5 that peripherally encompasses base 3 so as to form container cavity 7. Lid 2 has a lid rim 4 that peripherally encompasses lid 2.
The structure of preferred embodiment lid rim 4 will now be discussed in further detail. As best shown in
Base 3 includes a bottom-most level or floor 26 adjoined to sidewall 27. Sidewall 27 extends between base floor 26 and preferred embodiment, multi-segment rim 5. Sidewall 27 preferably includes beveled corners 30 for strength. Rim 5 includes ascending inner wall 12. The structure of preferred embodiment base 3 and its rim structure 5 are best shown in
As shown in the figures, in the preferred embodiment wall 12 comprises three sections: upper section 12a; middle section 12b; and lower section 12c. Upper section 12a is preferably formed as a chamfer between top segment 14 and middle wall section 12b. Lower section 12c curves or chamfers upward from platform 6 to middle section 12b. Middle section 12b is disposed between upper section 12a and lower section 12c. As seen in the figures and described below, the engagement of rims 4, 5 creates one or more proximal seal zones and one or more distal seal zones.
By virtue of the canting of inner wall 12 of rim 5 and outer wall 19 of rim 4, when container 1 is in the sealed state peripherally projecting segment 20 of lid rim 4 is pressed down upon and firmly contacts platform segment 6 of base rim 5 to form a first proximal seal zone A. In the preferred embodiment, this first proximal seal zone A is horizontally oriented. Also, when container 1 is in the sealed state, wall 12 (preferably at section 12b) of base rim 5 firmly contacts wall 19 of lid rim 4 to form a second proximal seal zone B. In the preferred embodiment, this second seal zone B is vertically oriented. By virtue of the shape and structure of the components of rims 4, 5, when lid 2 is sealed upon base 3, rims 4, 5 tightly engage. Thus, in the normally sealed state, the mating rim surfaces provide a leakproof seal. Additionally, when container 1 is in the sealed state, lid rim flange (an outer peripherally projecting segment) 9 contacts outer peripherally projecting top segment 14 of base rim 5 to form a first distal seal zone C. In the preferred embodiment, this first distal seal zone C is horizontally oriented. Flange 9 is accessible by those handling container 1, but its short length and the tight tolerances of the structures of rims 4, 5 make it very difficult to grasp.
As shown in the
As seen in
As seen in
As shown in
The vent feature described above means that a true tamper evident container can be provided with a venting mechanism that does not compromise the tamper evident quality of the container. The inventive container thus eliminates the need for a typical lid vent hole, which reduces the probability of tampering with the package contents after lidding. Additionally, the vent feature utilizes a seal area, between the vent groove and atmosphere, allowing the package to remain leak resistant while the contents are not under pressure. When the package contents create pressure, as in the case of cut fruit, the pressure is relieved as it forces open the seal area between the vent groove and the atmosphere. Additionally, if a consumer squeezes the sides of the package with too great a force, the vent feature allows pressure release before the lid might otherwise “pop” off the base. Placement of the vent feature, beneath the hinge, reduces visibility and detection of the feature. In carrying out the invention it is not important which rim, lid or base, is provided with the one or more venting channels 50. Accordingly, in another embodiment, outer wall 19 and segment 20 of lid rim 4 could be provided with venting channel 50.
A container constructed in accordance with the present invention can be manufactured in a variety of shapes and sizes, and is preferably formed of resins or plastic materials including, but not limited to, polyethylene, polypropylene, polyvinyl chloride or polyethylene terephthalate (“PET”). The container may be thermoformed, blow-molded or injection molded. The container lid and base can be transparent or translucent, and may be colored in either instance. Further, the container can be of any shape, including round or polygonal.
Having described the invention in detail, those skilled in the art will appreciate that modifications may be made of the invention without departing from its spirit. Therefore, it is not intended that the scope of the invention be limited to the specific embodiment illustrated and described.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
3216148 | Amberg | Nov 1965 | A |
4770318 | Earl | Sep 1988 | A |
6164484 | Fiore | Dec 2000 | A |
8875927 | Pohlman | Nov 2014 | B2 |
9580219 | Cimmerer | Feb 2017 | B2 |
9656785 | Cimmerer | May 2017 | B2 |
9796511 | Cimmerer | Oct 2017 | B2 |
20030173325 | Mavin | Sep 2003 | A1 |
20050269319 | Tang | Dec 2005 | A1 |
20100140267 | Sellari | Jun 2010 | A1 |
20100181323 | Thaler | Jul 2010 | A1 |
20100320210 | Cimmerer | Dec 2010 | A1 |
20110068105 | Pohlman | Mar 2011 | A1 |
20120181280 | Barbier et al. | Jul 2012 | A1 |
20170001775 | Cimmerer | Jan 2017 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
2389322 | Nov 2011 | EP |
201033089 | Sep 2010 | TW |
WO2010-147667 | Dec 2010 | WO |
Entry |
---|
International Search Report and Written Opinion from co-pending U.S. Appl. No. 15/790,285, filed Oct. 23, 2017, Cimmerer et al. |
European Search Report from co-pending EP Patent Application No. 18194146.9, dated Feb. 19, 2019. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20190084736 A1 | Mar 2019 | US |