1. Technical Field of the Invention
The present invention relates generally to a double-shell closure. More particularly, the present invention relates to a double-shell closure having first and second intersecting triangles for cutting a container liner but which leaves a portion of the liner connected to the container rim such that the cut liner does not fall into the container and contact the product therein.
2. Description of the Related Art
Various closure designs are known which provide a piercing element in order to open a liner. However, the prior art patents fails to disclose a closure having a cutter formed of intersecting perpendicular triangles for opening a liner.
In view of currently known closures, it is preferable to have a closure which vents the internal product pressure when a container or package is initially opened while minimizing a consumer's exposure to the product dust produced from internal package pressure during initial package opening.
The present invention provides a double-shell closure for a container having a liner seal extending across a container rim sealing the container and allowing for build up of internal container pressure. The double-shell closure includes an outer skirt depending from a peripheral edge of a top wall and an inner skirt depending from the top wall. The inner skirt comprises at least one thread helically extending along an inner surface of the inner skirt. Extending along the outer surface of the inner skirt from the top wall downward are a plurality of strengthening ribs in a spaced apart relationship. In one exemplary configuration, the strengthening ribs are spaced apart about 11.25 degrees from each other but alternatively the strengthening ribs may be spaced apart in a plurality of configurations.
Along an upper portion of the outer shell are a plurality of knurls for aid in gripping the closure during removal and application of the closure to the container threads and when the closure is inverted for cutting the liner seal during initial opening of the container.
Depending from the lower edge portion of the closure outer skirt are diametrically opposed locking lugs. The locking lugs engage lugs on the container neck to provide a child resistance feature. The locking lugs may be substantially triangular in shape having an inner surface, a tapered deflection surface, and an engaging surface. During application of the closure to the container neck, each deflection surface cams against an inner surface of the container neck locking lug deflecting the closure lugs inward and causing ovalized flexing of the closure outer skirt. The strengthening ribs inhibit any flexing of the inner skirt. Once the closure lugs pass by the container lugs the closure returns to its circular shape and the engaging surface of the closure lug engages the container neck lug so that the closure may not back-off. The engaging surface prevents the closure from backing off of the container neck. Thus the diametrically opposed gripping ribs, each spaced about ninety degrees from the closure lugs, must be squeezed causing ovalized flexing of the closure and radially outward movement of the lugs allowing the closure lugs to move outward beyond the container neck lugs and the closure to be removed from the container neck.
Extending upwardly from the top wall and radially inset from the peripheral edge is a deflection wall. The upwardly extending wall has a diameter slightly larger than the outer diameter of a container neck thread. Also extending from the top wall is an cutter device comprising a first axial cutter and a second radial cutter. When the closure is inverted and placed over a container having a liner seal over the container rim, the axial cutter punctures the seal causing a the liner seal to tear. The radial cutter spreads the liner apart along the tear caused by the axial cutter and pushes the liner into the container. This action continues as the closure is rotated until a small portion of the uncut liner remains connected to the container rim. In other words the liner is not completely broken by the cutter but instead a portion is left intact to prevent the liner from completely falling into the container and thereby minimizing liner contact with the product in the container.
The aspects and advantages of the present invention will be better understood when the detailed description of the preferred embodiment is taken in conjunction with the accompanying drawings, in which:
The present invention will now be described in conjunction with the drawings, referring initially to
Also located along the outer surface of the outer skirt 16 are a plurality of gripping ribs 28. The gripping ribs 28 are exemplified in
Referring now to
Extending upwardly from the top wall 12 is a deflecting wall 36. The deflecting wall 36 has a diameter which is slightly larger than the maximum outer diameter of a container thread 74. With this arrangement and as shown in
As shown in
The second radial cutter 44 is also an isosceles triangle however, the radial cutter may alternatively be an equilateral triangle. The radial cutter 44 extends in a radial direction, substantially orthogonal to the axial cutter 42 and intersecting the axial cutter 42 at vertical centerlines. The radial cutter 44 has a height that is less than the height of the axial cutter 42. The radial cutter 44 has at least two functions. First, the radial cutter 44 inhibits the seal liner from sealing around the axial cutter 42 when the seal liner is initially pierced. More specifically the spaces defined by about 90 degrees between the radial and axial cutter inhibit the seal liner from sealing against the axial cutter 42. Therefore pressure is relieved from within the container immediately when the closure 10 is inverted and placed over the container neck 72. Second, the radial cutter 44 spreads the seal liner where it is cut by the axial cutter 42 and pushes the seal liner downward into the container.
Extending radially inward from the deflecting wall 36 are feet 50. As best exemplified in
In use, the closure 10 is threadably disposed on the container neck 72 as shown in
Upon removing the closure 10 from the container neck 72, the closure 10 is inverted, the deflection wall 36 is aligned over the container rim, and the cutter 40 is pressed through a liner disposed over the container 70 opening, as shown in
The foregoing detailed description is given primarily for clearness of understanding and no unnecessary limitations are to be understood therefrom for modifications will become obvious to those skilled in the art upon reading this disclosure and may be made without departing from the spirit of the invention and scope of the appended claims.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
1100433 | Johnson | Jun 1914 | A |
2200029 | Kulling | May 1940 | A |
2297592 | Walter | Sep 1942 | A |
3931905 | Shumway et al. | Jan 1976 | A |
4340147 | McIntosh | Jul 1982 | A |
4634013 | Bar-Kokhba | Jan 1987 | A |
4709822 | Vataru | Dec 1987 | A |
4747501 | Greaves | May 1988 | A |
4898293 | Morel | Feb 1990 | A |
5090582 | Art et al. | Feb 1992 | A |
5238130 | Marques et al. | Aug 1993 | A |
5469980 | O'Meara et al. | Nov 1995 | A |
5657895 | Rogge | Aug 1997 | A |
5709311 | Butler et al. | Jan 1998 | A |
5797506 | Lehmukuhl et al. | Aug 1998 | A |
5915576 | Robinson | Jun 1999 | A |
6024234 | Rink et al. | Feb 2000 | A |
6039198 | Wolfe et al. | Mar 2000 | A |
6182845 | Wolfe et al. | Feb 2001 | B1 |
6386385 | Amanat et al. | May 2002 | B1 |
20020117501 | Amanat et al. | Aug 2002 | A1 |