This disclosure relates to energy management, and more particularly to energy management of household consumer appliances. The present disclosure finds particular application to energy management of a clothes washer appliance, and is also referred to as a clothes washer demand response.
Currently, utilities charge a flat rate. Increasing costs of fuel prices and high energy use during certain parts of the day make it highly likely that utilities will begin to require customers to pay a higher rate during peak demand. Accordingly, a potential cost savings is available to the homeowner by managing energy use of various household appliances, particularly during the peak demand periods. As is taught in the cross-referenced applications, a controller is configured to receive and process a signal, typically from a utility, indicative of a current cost of supplied energy. The controller is configured to change the operation of an appliance from a normal mode (e.g., when the demand and cost of the energy is lowest) to an energy savings mode (which can be at various levels, e.g., medium, high, critical). Thus, various responses are desired in an effort to reduce energy consumption and the associated cost.
More particularly, the parent application noted above generally teaches adjusting operation schedule, an operation delay, an operation adjustment and a select deactivation on at least one or more power consuming features or functions to reduce power consumption of the clothes washer in the energy savings mode. For example, the operation delay may include a delay in start time, an extension of time to a delayed start, pausing an existing cycle, delaying a restart or any combination of these examples. A need exists for providing alternative courses of operation in a peak demand state where a consumer's flexibility and convenience is maximized during peak pricing events.
A clothes washer includes at least one power-consuming feature, including a heater assembly. A controller is adapted to receive and process a signal from a utility indicative of the current cost of supplied energy. The controller operates the clothes washer in one of a plurality of operating modes, including at least a normal mode and an energy savings mode based on the received signal. The controller is configured to change the operation of the heater assembly for a period of time based on input received from the signal.
The heater assembly preferably includes a first heater and a second heater, or a dual wattage heater, and in the normal operating mode, only the first heater is used. In another normal operating mode, both of the first and second heaters are used, and in the energy savings mode, only one of the first and second heaters is used.
In one arrangement, the first heater has a greater wattage rating than the second heater.
In a normal operating mode, a water heating cycle is active for a shorter period of time than in the energy savings mode, and in the normal operating mode, one or both of the first and second heaters are used.
In another arrangement, only the lower wattage heater is operated during a water heating cycle in an energy savings mode.
A method of operating a clothes washer having a controller that receives and processes a signal from a utility indicative of the current cost of supplied energy includes providing a dual wattage heater assembly and operating the heater assembly at a lower wattage in the energy savings mode.
The method further includes extending a first time period of operating the selected cycle in the energy savings mode in comparison to a second time period of operating the selected cycle in the normal mode.
The present disclosure reduces the average power used by the clothes washer during peak pricing times, and/or reduces the overall energy used by the clothes washer during peak pricing times.
The present arrangement saves on costs, and adds convenience and flexibility for the consumer to deal with pricing events.
Still another benefit resides in completing the cycle faster while still shedding electrical load without having to pause or delay the cycle entirely.
Selected ones of the solutions are easy to execute, i.e., requiring only software to change the clothes washer operation as a result of received signals.
Still other benefits and advantages of this disclosure will become more apparent upon reading and understanding the following detailed description.
An exemplary embodiment of a demand managed appliance 100 is clothes washer 110 schematically illustrated in
The controller 104 can operate the clothes washer 110 in one of a plurality of operating modes, including a normal operating mode and an energy savings mode, in response to the received signal. Specifically, the clothes washer 110 can be operated in the normal mode in response to a signal indicating an off-peak demand state or period and can be operated in an energy savings mode in response to a signal indicating a peak demand state or period. As will be discussed in greater detail below, the controller 104 is configured to at least selectively adjust and/or disable the power consuming feature/function to reduce power consumption of the clothes washer 110 in the energy savings mode.
The clothes washer 110 generally includes an outer case or housing 112 and a control panel or user interface 116. The clothes washer further includes a lid pivotally mounted in the top wall. Though not shown in the drawings, clothes washer 110 includes within outer case 112, for example, a tub and/or wash basket 114 disposed for receiving clothes items to be washed, a drive system or motor 118 operatively connected to the controller and the basket 114 to tumble and/or agitate the wash load (also referred to herein as mechanical action) during wash and rinse cycles and spinning the basket during spin cycles, and a liquid distribution system comprising a water valve, for delivering water to the tub and basket and a pump for removing liquid from the tub, all of which may be of conventional design. Controller 104 is configured with a plurality of clothes washing algorithms preprogrammed in the memory to implement user selectable cycles for washing a variety of types and sizes of clothes loads. Each such cycle comprises a combination of pre-wash, wash, rinse, and spin sub-cycles. Each sub-cycle is a power consuming feature/function involving energization of a motor or other power consuming components. The amount of energy consumed by each cycle depends on the nature, number and duration of each of the sub-cycles comprising the cycle. The user interface 116 can include a display 120 and control buttons for enabling the user to make various operational selections. Instructions and selections are typically displayed on the display 120. The clothes washer further includes a door or lid 126 mounted within a top wall 128. Clothes washing algorithms can be preprogrammed in the memory accessed by the controller for many different types of cycles.
One response to a peak demand state is to delay operation, reschedule operation for a later start time, and/or alter one or more of selected functions/features in order to reduce energy demands. For example, clothes washers have the capacity to run at off-peak hours because demand is either not constant and/or the functions are such that immediate response is not necessary. However, a cost savings associated with reduced energy use during a peak demand period when energy costs are elevated must be evaluated with convenience for the consumer/homeowner. As one illustrative example, the clothes washer 110 that has been loaded during the daytime, i.e., typical peak demand period hours, can be programmed to delay operations for a later, albeit off-peak demand hours.
In order to reduce the peak energy consumed by a clothes washer, modifications and/or delays of individual clothes washer cycles can be adjusted in order to reduce the total and/or instantaneous energy consumed. Reducing total and/or instantaneous energy consumed also encompasses reducing the energy consumed at peak times and/or reducing the overall electricity demands during peak times and non-peak times.
In conjunction with the scheduling delays described above, or as separate operational changes, the following operation adjustments can be selected in order to reduce energy demands. The operation adjustments to be described hereinafter, can be implemented in conjunction with off-peak mode hours and/or can be implemented during on-peak mode hours. Associated with a clothes washer, the operational adjustments can include one or more of the following: a reduction in operating temperature (i.e. temperature set point adjustments) in one or more cycles, a disablement of one or more heaters in one or more cycles, reduction in power to one or more heaters, a switch from a selected cycle to a reduced power consumption cycle, a reduction in a duration of cycle time in one or more cycles, a disablement of one or more cycles, a skipping of one or more cycles, a reduction of water volume and/or water temperature in one or more cycles, and an adjustment to the wash additives (i.e., detergent, fabric softener, bleach, etc.) in one or more cycles. Illustratively, a switch from a selected cycle to a reduced power consumption cycle could include a change to the cycle definition when a command is received. For example, if a customer/user pushes “heavy duty wash” cycle, the selected cycle would then switch to a “regular” cycle, or the customer/user pushes “normal” cycle which would then switch to a “permanent press” cycle. As described, the switching is in response to lowering the energy demands from a selected cycle to a reduced power consumption cycle that meets a similar functional cycle.
With reference to
It is to be appreciated that a selectable override option can be provided on the user interface 116 providing a user the ability to select which of the one or more power consuming features/functions are adjusted by the controller in the energy savings mode. The user can selectively override adjustments, whether time related or function related, to any of the power consuming functions. The operational adjustments, particularly an energy savings operation can be accompanied by a display on the panel which communicates activation of the energy savings mode. The energy savings mode display can include a display of “ECO”, “Eco”, “EP”, “ER”, “CP”, “CPP”, “DR”, or “PP” or some other representation on the appliance display 120. In cases with displays having additional characters available, messaging can be enhanced accordingly.
Another load management program offered by an energy supplier may use price tiers which the utility manages dynamically to reflect the total cost of energy delivery to its customers. These tiers provide the customer a relative indicator of the price of energy and in one exemplary embodiment are defined as being LOW (level 1), MEDIUM (level 2), HIGH (level 3), and CRITICAL (level 4). In the illustrative embodiments the appliance control response to the LOW and MEDIUM tiers is the same namely the appliance remains in the normal operating mode. Likewise the response to the HIGH and CRITICAL tiers is the same, namely operating the appliance in the energy saving mode. However, it will be appreciated that the controller could be configured to implement a unique operating mode for each tier which provides a desired balance between compromised performance and cost savings/energy savings. If the utility offers more than two rate/cost conditions, different combinations of energy saving control steps may be programmed to provide satisfactory cost savings/performance tradeoff. The operational and functional adjustments described above, and others, can be initiated and/or dependent upon the tiers. For example, the clothes washer 110 hot water selection can be prevented or ‘blocked’ from activating if the pricing tier is at level 3 or 4. The display 120 can include an audible and visual alert of pricing tier 3 and 4. Some communication line with the utility can be established including, but not limited to, the communication arrangements hereinbefore described. In addition, the display 120 can provide the actual cost of running the appliance in the selected mode of operation, as well as, maintain a running display of the present cost of energy. If the utility offers more than two rate/cost conditions, different combinations of energy saving control steps may be programmed to provide satisfactory cost savings/performance tradeoff.
Turning next to
As shown in
Two potential solutions simultaneously satisfy a desire to save energy and reduce costs while also limiting the inconvenience to the homeowner. For example, as illustrated in
If a dual wattage heater is provided in the clothes washer, or alternatively a second, lower wattage heater 142 is used, then lower wattage heater operation will result in a substantial reduction in instantaneous wattage used during the wash cycle, and particularly during the sanitizing portion of the wash cycle. Thus, plot 410 represents the instantaneous wattage during this energy savings mode of operation that uses the low wattage heater to heat the water. The instantaneous wattage ranges, for example, between 450 and 700 watts as shown in region 412 of the plot 410. It will also be appreciated that the reduced instantaneous wattage will take longer to heat the water to the desired temperature and thus this portion 412 of the graph, when compared to 404 representative of instantaneous wattage during normal operation with a higher wattage heater, is substantially extended. In this slower heating arrangement the cycle time is longer but there is a slight reduction in the cost and total energy consumption as evident from a comparison of total energy consumption during normal operation represented by plot 416 and the total energy consumption during the energy saving operation using the low wattage heater as represented by plot 418.
It is believed that a dual wattage heater where the first and second wattage ratings are used for the same function (heating of the water), or alternatively use of a second heater having a lower wattage rating than the first heater and again used for the same function (such as heating the water), has not been used in a clothes washers. This is contrasted with a dual wattage heater or use of a second heater for use with a different function, e.g., a steam cycle. The concept of the present disclosure allows a washer cycle to employ a heater for use with a sanitize cycle to be completed without undue delay and while still benefiting the grid and saving the consumer money even if the consumer does not want to wait. Although the cycle time will be longer than compared to the normal mode of operation, the wash cycle will not itself be delayed (inactive) during these critical time periods. Using the lower wattage heater during the costly operation times minimizes the cost impact of running a sanitization cycle if the consumer wants to run the cycle at an expensive time period. The required temperature used in a sanitization cycle can still be achieved and adequately treat various soiled garments or laundry items.
In addition, if the DSM signal reduces to a non-high or a non-peak level during the extended heating cycle, the controller 104 can be configured to allow the clothes washer to return to the normal operation mode or could continue with the energy savings mode of operation until the wash cycle is complete
The disclosure has been described with reference to the preferred embodiments. Obviously, modifications and alterations will occur to others upon reading and understanding the preceding detailed description. It is intended that the invention be construed as including all such modifications and alterations.
The present application is a continuation-in-part application and claims priority from U.S. patent application Ser. No. 12/559,751, filed 15 Sep. 2009, which application is expressly incorporated herein by reference in its entirety.
| Number | Name | Date | Kind |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2545054 | Stitz | Mar 1951 | A |
| 3683343 | Feldman et al. | Aug 1972 | A |
| 3720073 | McCarty | Mar 1973 | A |
| 4048812 | Thomason | Sep 1977 | A |
| 4167786 | Miller et al. | Sep 1979 | A |
| 4190756 | Foerstner | Feb 1980 | A |
| 4216658 | Baker et al. | Aug 1980 | A |
| 4247786 | Hedges | Jan 1981 | A |
| 4362970 | Grady | Dec 1982 | A |
| 4454509 | Buennagel et al. | Jun 1984 | A |
| 4637219 | Grose | Jan 1987 | A |
| 4659943 | Virant | Apr 1987 | A |
| 4718403 | McCall | Jan 1988 | A |
| 4731547 | Alenduff et al. | Mar 1988 | A |
| 4903502 | Hanson et al. | Feb 1990 | A |
| 4998024 | Kirk et al. | Mar 1991 | A |
| 5040724 | Brinkruff et al. | Aug 1991 | A |
| 5137041 | Hall et al. | Aug 1992 | A |
| 5183998 | Hoffman et al. | Feb 1993 | A |
| 5220807 | Bourne et al. | Jun 1993 | A |
| 5224355 | So et al. | Jul 1993 | A |
| 5230467 | Kubsch et al. | Jul 1993 | A |
| 5289362 | Liebl et al. | Feb 1994 | A |
| 5408578 | Bolivar | Apr 1995 | A |
| 5430430 | Gilbert | Jul 1995 | A |
| 5451843 | Kahn et al. | Sep 1995 | A |
| 5462225 | Massara et al. | Oct 1995 | A |
| 5479157 | Suman et al. | Dec 1995 | A |
| 5479558 | White et al. | Dec 1995 | A |
| 5481140 | Maruyama et al. | Jan 1996 | A |
| 5495551 | Robinson et al. | Feb 1996 | A |
| 5504306 | Russell et al. | Apr 1996 | A |
| 5505377 | Weiss | Apr 1996 | A |
| 5515692 | Sterber et al. | May 1996 | A |
| 5574979 | West | Nov 1996 | A |
| 5581132 | Chadwick | Dec 1996 | A |
| 5635895 | Murr | Jun 1997 | A |
| 5706191 | Bassett et al. | Jan 1998 | A |
| 5761083 | Brown et al. | Jun 1998 | A |
| 5816491 | Berkeley et al. | Oct 1998 | A |
| 5866880 | Seitz et al. | Feb 1999 | A |
| 5874902 | Heinrich et al. | Feb 1999 | A |
| 5880536 | Mardirossian | Mar 1999 | A |
| 5883802 | Harris | Mar 1999 | A |
| 5886647 | Badger et al. | Mar 1999 | A |
| 5926776 | Glorioso et al. | Jul 1999 | A |
| 5937942 | Bias et al. | Aug 1999 | A |
| 5956462 | Langford | Sep 1999 | A |
| 6018150 | Maher | Jan 2000 | A |
| 6026651 | Sandelman | Feb 2000 | A |
| 6080971 | Seitz | Jun 2000 | A |
| 6118099 | Lake | Sep 2000 | A |
| 6179213 | Gibino et al. | Jan 2001 | B1 |
| 6185483 | Drees | Feb 2001 | B1 |
| 6229433 | Rye et al. | May 2001 | B1 |
| 6246831 | Seitz et al. | Jun 2001 | B1 |
| 6380866 | Sizer et al. | Apr 2002 | B1 |
| 6400103 | Adamson | Jun 2002 | B1 |
| 6480753 | Calder et al. | Nov 2002 | B1 |
| 6489597 | Hornung | Dec 2002 | B1 |
| 6553595 | Bruntz et al. | Apr 2003 | B1 |
| 6631622 | Ghent et al. | Oct 2003 | B1 |
| 6694753 | Lanz et al. | Feb 2004 | B1 |
| 6694927 | Pouchak et al. | Feb 2004 | B1 |
| 6704401 | Piepho et al. | Mar 2004 | B2 |
| 6778868 | Imamura et al. | Aug 2004 | B2 |
| 6784872 | Matsui et al. | Aug 2004 | B1 |
| 6806446 | Neale | Oct 2004 | B1 |
| 6817195 | Rafalovich et al. | Nov 2004 | B2 |
| 6828695 | Hansen | Dec 2004 | B1 |
| 6860431 | Jayadev | Mar 2005 | B2 |
| 6873876 | Aisa | Mar 2005 | B1 |
| 6879059 | Sleva | Apr 2005 | B2 |
| 6904385 | Budike | Jun 2005 | B1 |
| 6922598 | Lim et al. | Jul 2005 | B2 |
| 6943321 | Carbone et al. | Sep 2005 | B2 |
| 6961642 | Horst | Nov 2005 | B2 |
| 6983210 | Matsubayashi et al. | Jan 2006 | B2 |
| 7010363 | Donnelly et al. | Mar 2006 | B2 |
| 7039575 | Juneau | May 2006 | B2 |
| 7043380 | Rodenberg et al. | May 2006 | B2 |
| 7053790 | Jang et al. | May 2006 | B2 |
| 7057140 | Pittman | Jun 2006 | B2 |
| 7069090 | Huffington et al. | Jun 2006 | B2 |
| 7082380 | Wiebe et al. | Jul 2006 | B2 |
| 7110832 | Ghent | Sep 2006 | B2 |
| 7155305 | Hayes et al. | Dec 2006 | B2 |
| 7164851 | Sturm et al. | Jan 2007 | B2 |
| 7206670 | Pimputkar et al. | Apr 2007 | B2 |
| 7266962 | Montuoro et al. | Sep 2007 | B2 |
| 7274973 | Nichols et al. | Sep 2007 | B2 |
| 7274975 | Miller et al. | Sep 2007 | B2 |
| 7368686 | Etheredge et al. | May 2008 | B2 |
| 7372002 | Nakamura et al. | May 2008 | B2 |
| 7420140 | Lenhart et al. | Sep 2008 | B2 |
| 7420293 | Donnelly et al. | Sep 2008 | B2 |
| 7446646 | Huomo | Nov 2008 | B2 |
| 7478070 | Fukui et al. | Jan 2009 | B2 |
| 7541941 | Bogolea et al. | Jun 2009 | B2 |
| 7561977 | Horst et al. | Jul 2009 | B2 |
| 7565813 | Pouchak | Jul 2009 | B2 |
| 7685849 | Worthington | Mar 2010 | B2 |
| 7720035 | Oh et al. | May 2010 | B2 |
| 7751339 | Melton et al. | Jul 2010 | B2 |
| 7783390 | Miller | Aug 2010 | B2 |
| 7919729 | Hsu | Apr 2011 | B2 |
| 7925388 | Ying | Apr 2011 | B2 |
| 7962248 | Flohr | Jun 2011 | B2 |
| 7991513 | Pitt | Aug 2011 | B2 |
| 8024073 | Imes et al. | Sep 2011 | B2 |
| 8027752 | Castaldo et al. | Sep 2011 | B2 |
| 8033686 | Recker et al. | Oct 2011 | B2 |
| 8094037 | Unger | Jan 2012 | B2 |
| 8185252 | Besore | May 2012 | B2 |
| 8190302 | Burt et al. | May 2012 | B2 |
| 8355748 | Abe et al. | Jan 2013 | B2 |
| 8367984 | Besore et al. | Feb 2013 | B2 |
| 20010025349 | Sharood et al. | Sep 2001 | A1 |
| 20010048361 | Mays et al. | Dec 2001 | A1 |
| 20020024332 | Gardner | Feb 2002 | A1 |
| 20020071689 | Miyamoto | Jun 2002 | A1 |
| 20020125246 | Cho et al. | Sep 2002 | A1 |
| 20020175806 | Marneweck et al. | Nov 2002 | A1 |
| 20020196124 | Howard et al. | Dec 2002 | A1 |
| 20020198629 | Ellis | Dec 2002 | A1 |
| 20030036820 | Yellepeddy et al. | Feb 2003 | A1 |
| 20030043845 | Lim et al. | Mar 2003 | A1 |
| 20030178894 | Ghent | Sep 2003 | A1 |
| 20030193405 | Hunt et al. | Oct 2003 | A1 |
| 20030194979 | Richards et al. | Oct 2003 | A1 |
| 20030233201 | Horst et al. | Dec 2003 | A1 |
| 20040024483 | Holcombe | Feb 2004 | A1 |
| 20040034484 | Solomita et al. | Feb 2004 | A1 |
| 20040098171 | Horst | May 2004 | A1 |
| 20040100199 | Yang | May 2004 | A1 |
| 20040107510 | Buckroyd et al. | Jun 2004 | A1 |
| 20040112070 | Schanin | Jun 2004 | A1 |
| 20040117330 | Ehlers et al. | Jun 2004 | A1 |
| 20040118008 | Jeong et al. | Jun 2004 | A1 |
| 20040128266 | Yellepeddy et al. | Jul 2004 | A1 |
| 20040133314 | Ehlers et al. | Jul 2004 | A1 |
| 20040139038 | Ehlers et al. | Jul 2004 | A1 |
| 20040254654 | Donnelly et al. | Dec 2004 | A1 |
| 20050011205 | Holmes et al. | Jan 2005 | A1 |
| 20050134469 | Odorcic et al. | Jun 2005 | A1 |
| 20050138929 | Enis et al. | Jun 2005 | A1 |
| 20050173401 | Bakanowski et al. | Aug 2005 | A1 |
| 20050184046 | Sterling | Aug 2005 | A1 |
| 20050190074 | Cumeralto et al. | Sep 2005 | A1 |
| 20060031180 | Tamarkin et al. | Feb 2006 | A1 |
| 20060036338 | Harkcom et al. | Feb 2006 | A1 |
| 20060068728 | Ishidoshiro et al. | Mar 2006 | A1 |
| 20060095164 | Donnelly et al. | May 2006 | A1 |
| 20060123807 | Sullivan et al. | Jun 2006 | A1 |
| 20060159043 | Delp et al. | Jul 2006 | A1 |
| 20060190139 | Reaume et al. | Aug 2006 | A1 |
| 20060208570 | Christian et al. | Sep 2006 | A1 |
| 20060272830 | Fima et al. | Dec 2006 | A1 |
| 20060276938 | Miller | Dec 2006 | A1 |
| 20060289436 | Carbone et al. | Dec 2006 | A1 |
| 20070005195 | Pasquale et al. | Jan 2007 | A1 |
| 20070030116 | Feher | Feb 2007 | A1 |
| 20070043478 | Ehlers et al. | Feb 2007 | A1 |
| 20070136217 | Johnson et al. | Jun 2007 | A1 |
| 20070151311 | McAllister et al. | Jul 2007 | A1 |
| 20070185675 | Papamichael et al. | Aug 2007 | A1 |
| 20070203860 | Golden et al. | Aug 2007 | A1 |
| 20070213880 | Ehlers | Sep 2007 | A1 |
| 20070220907 | Ehlers | Sep 2007 | A1 |
| 20070229236 | Mercer et al. | Oct 2007 | A1 |
| 20070271006 | Golden et al. | Nov 2007 | A1 |
| 20070276547 | Miller | Nov 2007 | A1 |
| 20080029081 | Gagas et al. | Feb 2008 | A1 |
| 20080034768 | Pimentel et al. | Feb 2008 | A1 |
| 20080083729 | Etheredge et al. | Apr 2008 | A1 |
| 20080106147 | Caggiano et al. | May 2008 | A1 |
| 20080120790 | Ashrafzadeh | May 2008 | A1 |
| 20080122585 | Castaldo et al. | May 2008 | A1 |
| 20080136581 | Heilman et al. | Jun 2008 | A1 |
| 20080144550 | Makhlouf et al. | Jun 2008 | A1 |
| 20080167756 | Golden et al. | Jul 2008 | A1 |
| 20080167931 | Gerstemeier et al. | Jul 2008 | A1 |
| 20080172312 | Synesiou et al. | Jul 2008 | A1 |
| 20080177678 | Di Martini et al. | Jul 2008 | A1 |
| 20080179052 | Kates | Jul 2008 | A1 |
| 20080204240 | Hilgers et al. | Aug 2008 | A1 |
| 20080215263 | Flohr | Sep 2008 | A1 |
| 20080258633 | Voysey | Oct 2008 | A1 |
| 20080272934 | Wang et al. | Nov 2008 | A1 |
| 20080277487 | Mueller et al. | Nov 2008 | A1 |
| 20090006878 | Borghetti et al. | Jan 2009 | A1 |
| 20090038369 | Vondras | Feb 2009 | A1 |
| 20090063257 | Zak et al. | Mar 2009 | A1 |
| 20090105888 | Flohr et al. | Apr 2009 | A1 |
| 20090146838 | Katz | Jun 2009 | A1 |
| 20090171862 | Harrod et al. | Jul 2009 | A1 |
| 20090235675 | Chang et al. | Sep 2009 | A1 |
| 20090240381 | Lane | Sep 2009 | A1 |
| 20090326728 | Chrisop et al. | Dec 2009 | A1 |
| 20100017242 | Hamilton et al. | Jan 2010 | A1 |
| 20100070091 | Watson et al. | Mar 2010 | A1 |
| 20100092625 | Finch et al. | Apr 2010 | A1 |
| 20100131117 | Mattiocco et al. | May 2010 | A1 |
| 20100175719 | Finch et al. | Jul 2010 | A1 |
| 20100179708 | Watson et al. | Jul 2010 | A1 |
| 20100262963 | Wassermann et al. | Oct 2010 | A1 |
| 20100301774 | Chemel et al. | Dec 2010 | A1 |
| 20110001438 | Chemel et al. | Jan 2011 | A1 |
| 20110062142 | Steurer | Mar 2011 | A1 |
| 20110085287 | Ebrom et al. | Apr 2011 | A1 |
| 20110087382 | Santacatterina et al. | Apr 2011 | A1 |
| 20110095017 | Steurer | Apr 2011 | A1 |
| 20110106328 | Zhou et al. | May 2011 | A1 |
| 20110114627 | Burt | May 2011 | A1 |
| 20110123179 | Roetker et al. | May 2011 | A1 |
| 20110148390 | Burt et al. | Jun 2011 | A1 |
| 20110181114 | Hodges et al. | Jul 2011 | A1 |
| 20110290781 | Burt et al. | Dec 2011 | A1 |
| 20120054123 | Broniak et al. | Mar 2012 | A1 |
| Number | Date | Country |
|---|---|---|
| 1692317 | Nov 2005 | CN |
| 101013979 | Aug 2007 | CN |
| 1496324 | Jan 2005 | EP |
| 2105127 | Mar 1983 | GB |
| 11313441 | Nov 1999 | JP |
| 20060085711 | Jul 2006 | KR |
| 8600976 | Feb 1986 | WO |
| 9012261 | Oct 1990 | WO |
| 9848335 | Oct 1998 | WO |
| WO 2007060059 | May 2007 | WO |
| 2007136456 | Nov 2007 | WO |
| Entry |
|---|
| PCT/US2009/056919 International Search Report. |
| International Search Report from PCT Application No. PCT/US2009/056878, Nov. 17, 2009. |
| International Search Report from PCT Application No. PCT/US2009/056882, Nov. 4, 2009. |
| International Search Report from PCT Application No. PCT/US2009/056883, Oct. 26, 2009. |
| International Search Report from PCT Application No. PCT/US2009/056886, Nov. 5, 2009. |
| International Search Report from PCT Application No. PCT/US2009/056889, Nov. 10, 2009. |
| International Search Report from PCT Application No. PCT/US2009/056894, Nov. 13, 2009. |
| International Search Report from PCT Application No. PCT/US2009/056895, Nov. 9, 2009. |
| International Search Report from PCT Application No. PCT/US2009/056901, Nov. 10, 2009. |
| International Search Report from PCT Application No. PCT/US2009/056906, Nov. 10, 2009. |
| International Search Report from PCT Application No. PCT/US2009/056913, Nov. 10, 2009. |
| International Search Report from PCT Application No. PCT/US2009/056914, Nov. 2, 2009. |
| Search Report from EP Application No. 10153695.1, May 24, 2012. |
| Real-Time Feedback, Natural Resources Canada via website www.nrcan.gc.ca , 2008, http://oee.nrcan.gc.ca/publications/equipment/10918. |
| International Search Report from PCT Application No. PCT/US2009/056911, Mar. 10, 2010. |
| Lemay et al., An Integrated Architecture for Demand Response Communications and Control, University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign, Oct. 28, 2008. |
| Search Report from CN Application No. 201010135268.8 dated Oct. 24, 2012. |
| Weisstein, Eric W. “At Least One.”, From MathWorld—A Wolfram Web Resource, http://mathworld.com/AtLeastOne.html, p. 1, |
| Number | Date | Country | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 20110061175 A1 | Mar 2011 | US |
| Number | Date | Country | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Parent | 12559751 | Sep 2009 | US |
| Child | 12899920 | US |