The present description relates generally to wired communications, and more particularly, but not exclusively, to common mode (CM) clamping methods and circuits for wired communication applications.
In some applications, including automotive applications, the line drivers are expected to be able to tolerate common mode (CM) noise (e.g., a CM surge) to a specific level. The CM surge can result from an electromagnetic interference (EMI). For example, in an automotive application, the line driver has to be able to tolerate, at the output pins, up to 2V of CM surge voltage based on EMI. Accommodation of such a CM signal (e.g., in an automotive chip or in an Ethernet PHY chip for transmission at 100 Mbps or higher speed) can bring about undesirable consequences. For example, higher supply voltage (e.g., at least 3.3 V) is needed which results in higher power consumption. A thick oxide device has to be employed to tolerate the over-voltage stress, which exacerbates speed and power issues. Bulkier and more costly CM chokes (CMCs) or transformers may be needed, which can lead to an increased bill of material (BOM) and potentially differential mode (DM) noise due to a mismatch between mutually coupled inductors.
The above undesirable consequences can become more significant with the data rates scaled by 10× to 1 Gbps for reduced twisted-pair gigabit Ethernet (RTPGE). Therefore, it is highly desirable to clamp at the output pin with a very low (e.g., zero) CM impedance, when the surge occurs, while keeping the DM impedance and the CM termination, at normal common mode noise levels, intact. Existing clamping solutions, although may work for their intended purposes, are facing a number of drawbacks such as limited performance in terms of band-width (BW), capacity, scalability, and flexibility in choice of the CM impedance and operation mode.
Certain features of the subject technology are set forth in the appended claims. However, for purpose of explanation, several embodiments of the subject technology are set forth in the following figures.
The detailed description set forth below is intended as a description of various configurations of the subject technology and is not intended to represent the only configurations in which the subject technology can be practiced. The appended drawings are incorporated herein and constitute a part of the detailed description. The detailed description includes specific details for the purpose of providing a thorough understanding of the subject technology. However, it will be clear and apparent to those skilled in the art that the subject technology is not limited to the specific details set forth herein and can be practiced using one or more implementations. In one or more instances, well-known structures and components are shown in block diagram form in order to avoid obscuring the concepts of the subject technology.
The subject technology provides common mode (CM) clamping devices and methods for a number of applications. Examples of the applications include automotive applications, broadband applications with wired connectivity such as Ethernet, and other applications. The disclosed solution allows achieving very low (e.g., close to zero) CM impedance, while keeping the differential mode (DM) impedance and CM termination, at normal noise levels, intact. The subject technology provides a CM clamp circuit that can be independently designed, optimized, and applied to differential nodes, while meeting the CM impedance requirements without affecting DM design and performance. The disclosed CM clamp circuit can be merged with the main circuit, for example, to share an output stage. The subject technology provides a universal solution to CM problems including, but not limited to, CM stability, CM noise rejection, and CM termination. The disclosed clamp circuit can be used with a lower supply voltage (e.g., 1.8 V) and thinner oxide device and provides a higher bandwidth, while achieving significantly higher level electromagnetic compatibility (EMC) and immunity at a lower cost and power consumption.
In some implementations, the CM clamp circuit of the subject technology can be used at various nodes of the transmitter circuit 110 and/or the receiver circuit 120, including the respective output and input ports 112 and 122, and any other nodes such as nodes of the CMCs 130 and 132 and/or nodes of the transformers 140 and 142. In some aspects, the addition of one or more of the disclosed CM clamp circuits to the transmitter circuit 110 and/or the receiver circuit 120 may sufficiently reduce the CM impedance at the desired nodes of the transmitter circuit 110 and/or the receiver circuit 120, such that one or more of the CMCs 130 and 132 and/or the transformers 140 and 142 can be conserved. For data rates up to or higher than 1 Gbps, using reduced twisted pair gigabit Ethernet (RTPGE) for the wireline 150, it is highly desirable to clamp at the output and input ports 112 and 122 with nearly zero CM impedance, when a CM surge such as an electromagnetic interference (EMI) occurs, for example, over the wireline 150. The nearly zero CM impedance has to be provided while keeping the termination at normal CM noise and differential mode impedance intact.
In the implementation 200B, a circuit (e.g., a chip) 230 is coupled at an output port (e.g., nodes) 234, via an off-chip CM choke 252 to a wireline (not shown in
The second circuit 320 is a DM-in-CM-out transconductance circuit (e.g., with a transconductance Gm) that can reject the DM input by the CM voltage sense and the matched pair of current signals iA=iB=Gm (Vp−Vn), where Vp and Vn, are voltages at respective input nodes p and n of the transconductance circuit 320. In other words, the matched pair of current signals iA and iB are only provided when the output voltage 312 of the CM sense circuit 310 is different from the reference voltage Vcm. In some aspects, the CM sense circuit 310 is configured to provide an output voltage 312 equal to Vcm, when only a differential voltage is sensed at the clamp terminals 322. In practice, the reference voltage Vcm can be set to a desired value based on the application.
In some implementations, the CM clamp circuit 300 is configurable to operate in one or more of a number of modes of operations including class A, class AB, class B, or class C modes of operation. The CM clamp circuit 300 is also configurable to provide the desired CM impedance for multiple levels of CM noise (e.g., EMI).
In one or more implementations, the second circuit 320 (e.g., the DM-in-CM-out transconductance circuit) includes an input stage and a pair of replicated push-pull output stages. The input stage is formed by a transconductance circuit 340 having a transconductance gm1, which is coupled through a biasing circuit to the push-pull output stages. The biasing circuit is formed by a pair of transistors (e.g., MOS transistors) M1 and M2 and current sources Ib coupling the transistors to supply voltages Vdd and Vss. The respective gate nodes 352 and 354 of the transistors M1 and M2 can be coupled to suitable bias voltages.
The replicated push-pull output stages are formed by transistor pairs (e.g., CMOS pairs) MPA and MNA, and MPB and MNB. The second circuit 320 can provide the desired CM impedance that is approximately equal to 1/(2Gm), where Gm is the transconductance of the second circuit 320. The second circuit 320 can operate in one of class A, class B, or class AB modes, and can include a pair of matched offset current sources IOS that can facilitate class B or class C operations. The injection of currents by the offset current sources IOS can be programmable in order to allow setting of the class B or C dead-zone. Operation in class B or C, with a dead zone around Vcm where Gm=0, has the following benefits. First, the output transistors MPA, MNA. MPB, and MNB are off for most of the time when there is no CM noise (e.g., CM surge), which reduces power consumption and loading. Second, the push-up transistors MPA and MPB, and the Pull-down transistors MNA and MNB have more headroom when turned on, therefore can reduce DM conversion. The DM conversion can be reduced to a lowest value by, for example, well matching of the transistors of the replicated push-pull output stages at the layout stage (e.g., in ABAB . . . AB pattern).
In one or more implementations, method 400 includes coupling clamp terminals (e.g., 322 of
Those of skill in the art would appreciate that the various illustrative blocks, modules, elements, components, and methods described herein can be implemented as electronic hardware, computer software, or combinations of both. To illustrate this interchangeability of hardware and software, various illustrative blocks, modules, elements, components, and methods have been described above generally in terms of their functionality. Whether such functionality is implemented as hardware or software depends upon the particular application and design constraints imposed on the overall system. Skilled artisans can implement the described functionality in varying ways for each particular application. Various components and blocks can be arranged differently (e.g., arranged in a different order, or partitioned in a different way) all without departing from the scope of the subject technology.
As used herein, the phrase “at least one of” preceding a series of items, with the term “and” or “or” to separate any of the items, modifies the list as a whole, rather than each member of the list (i.e., each item). The phrase “at least one of” does not require selection of at least one of each item listed; rather, the phrase allows a meaning that includes at least one of any one of the items, and/or at least one of any combination of the items, and/or at least one of each of the items. By way of example, the phrases “at least one of A, B, and C” or “at least one of A, B, or C” each refer to only A, only B, or only C; any combination of A, B, and C; and/or at least one of each of A, B, and C.
A phrase such as “an aspect” does not imply that such aspect is essential to the subject technology or that such aspect applies to all configurations of the subject technology. A disclosure relating to an aspect can apply to all configurations, or one or more configurations. An aspect can provide one or more examples of the disclosure. A phrase such as an “aspect” refers to one or more aspects and vice versa. A phrase such as an “embodiment” does not imply that such embodiment is essential to the subject technology or that such embodiment applies to all configurations of the subject technology. A disclosure relating to an embodiment can apply to all embodiments, or one or more embodiments. An embodiment can provide one or more examples of the disclosure. A phrase such an “embodiment” can refer to one or more embodiments and vice versa. A phrase such as a “configuration” does not imply that such configuration is essential to the subject technology or that such configuration applies to all configurations of the subject technology. A disclosure relating to a configuration can apply to all configurations, or one or more configurations. A configuration can provide one or more examples of the disclosure. A phrase such as a “configuration” can refer to one or more configurations and vice versa.
The word “exemplary” is used herein to mean “serving as an example, instance, or illustration.” Any embodiment described herein as “exemplary” or as an “example” is not necessarily to be construed as preferred or advantageous over other embodiments. Furthermore, to the extent that the term “include,” “have,” or the like is used in the description or the claims, such term is intended to be inclusive in a manner similar to the term “comprise” as “comprise” is interpreted when employed as a transitional word in a claim.
All structural and functional equivalents to the elements of the various aspects described throughout this disclosure that are known or later come to be known to those of ordinary skill in the art are expressly incorporated herein by reference and are intended to be encompassed by the claims. Moreover, nothing disclosed herein is intended to be dedicated to the public regardless of whether such disclosure is explicitly recited in the claims. No claim element is to be construed under the provisions of 35 U.S.C. §112, sixth paragraph, unless the element is expressly recited using the phrase “means for” or, in the case of a method claim, the element is recited using the phrase “step for.”
The previous description is provided to enable any person skilled in the art to practice the various aspects described herein. Various modifications to these aspects will be readily apparent to those skilled in the art, and the generic principles defined herein can be applied to other aspects. Thus, the claims are not intended to be limited to the aspects shown herein, but are to be accorded the full scope consistent with the language claims, wherein reference to an element in the singular is not intended to mean “one and only one” unless specifically so stated, but rather “one or more.” Unless specifically stated otherwise, the term “some” refers to one or more. Pronouns in the masculine (e.g., his) include the feminine and neuter gender (e.g., her and its) and vice versa. Headings and subheadings, if any, are used for convenience only and do not limit the subject disclosure.
This application claims the benefit of priority under 35 U.S.C. §119 from U.S. Provisional Patent Application 61/980,496 filed Apr. 16, 2014, which is incorporated herein by reference in its entirety.
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
61980496 | Apr 2014 | US |