The present disclosure generally relates to thermal barrier coatings for high-temperature mechanical systems, such as gas turbine engines, and more particularly to thermal barrier coatings including rare earth oxides.
The components of high-temperature mechanical systems, such as, for example, gas-turbine engines, must operate in severe environments. For example, the high-pressure turbine blades and vanes exposed to hot gases in commercial aeronautical engines typically experience metal surface temperatures of about 1000° C., with short-term peaks as high as 1100° C. Typical components of high-temperature mechanical systems include a Ni or Co-based superalloy substrate. In an attempt to reduce the temperatures experienced by the substrate, the substrate can be coated with a thermal barrier coating (TBC). The thermal barrier coating may include a thermally insulative ceramic topcoat and is bonded to the substrate by an underlying metallic bond coat. The TBC, usually applied either by air plasma spraying or electron beam physical vapor deposition, is most often a layer of yttria-stabilized zirconia (YSZ) with a thickness of about 100-500 μm. The properties of YSZ include low thermal conductivity, high oxygen permeability, and a relatively high coefficient of thermal expansion. The YSZ TBC is also typically made “strain tolerant” and the thermal conductivity further lowered by depositing a structure that contains numerous pores and/or pathways.
Economic and environmental concerns, i.e., the desire for improved efficiency and reduced emissions, continue to drive the development of advanced gas turbine engines with higher inlet temperatures. As the turbine inlet temperature continues to increase, there is a demand for a TBC with lower thermal conductivity and higher temperature stability to minimize the increase in, maintain, or even lower the temperatures experienced by substrate.
In general, the invention is directed to a TBC or EBC topcoat having enhanced CMAS-resistance compared to conventional YSZ topcoats. CMAS is a calcia-magnesia-alumina-silicate deposit resulting from the ingestion of siliceous minerals (dust, sand, volcanic ashes, runway debris, and the like) with the intake of air in gas turbine engines.
In one aspect, the disclosure is directed to a coating with a CMAS-resistant layer including a rare earth oxide, wherein the CMAS-resistant layer is essentially free of zirconia and hafnia.
In another aspect the disclosure is directed to a coating with a CMAS-resistant layer including a rare earth oxide and a second layer. The second layer includes a compound selected from a MCrAlY alloy, wherein M is selected from Ni, Co, and NiCo; a β-NiAl alloy; a γ-Ni+γ′-Ni3Al alloy; rare earth oxide-stabilized zirconia, rare earth oxide-stabilized hafnia, mullite, silicon, barium strontium aluminosilicate, calcium aluminosilicate, cordierite, lithium aluminosilicate, rare earth silicates, and combinations thereof. The CMAS-resistant layer is adjacent the second layer.
In yet another aspect, the disclosure is directed to an article with a substrate and a CMAS-resistant layer including a rare earth oxide, wherein the first layer is essentially free of zirconia and hafnia.
The details of one or more embodiments of the invention are set forth in the accompanying drawings and the description below. Other features, objects, and advantages of the invention will be apparent from the description and drawings, and from the claims.
In general, the disclosure is directed to thermal barrier coating (TBC) compositions that possess increased CMAS (calcia-magnesia-alumina-silicate) degradation resistance compared to conventional yttria-stabilized zirconia (YSZ) TBCs, and articles coated with such TBCs. More specifically, the disclosure is directed to a thermal barrier coating including a CMAS-resistant layer that reacts with CMAS leading to increased CMAS degradation resistance compared to conventional YSZ TBCs.
As turbine inlet temperatures continue to increase, new thermal barrier coatings are required with better high temperature performance. As described briefly above, TBCs are typically deposited as a porous structure, which increases the stress tolerance and reduces the thermal conductivity of the TBC. However, this porous structure is susceptible to damage. Higher turbine inlet temperatures may lead to damage of the TBC when CMAS, a calcia-magnesia-alumina-silicate deposit, is formed from the ingestion of siliceous minerals (dust, sand, volcanic ashes, runway debris, and the like) with the intake of air in gas turbine engines. Typical CMAS deposits have a melting temperature of about 1200° C. to about 1250° C. (about 2200° F. to about 2300° F.). As advanced engines run at TBC surface temperatures above the CMAS melting temperature, the molten CMAS may infiltrate the pores of the TBC. When the component is cooled below the CMAS melting temperature, the CMAS solidifies, which exerts a strain on the TBC and may reduce its useful life. The filling of the pores of the TBC with molten CMAS may also increase the thermal conductivity of the TBC, which is detrimental to the TBC performance and causes higher thermal stress on the component substrate.
Additionally, the molten CMAS may dissolve the YSZ TBC. The YSZ TBC dissolves preferentially along grain boundaries, and depending on the melt chemistry, zirconia with lower yttria content may precipitate out of the molten solution, thus decreasing the effectiveness of the TBC.
The substrate 12 may be a component of a high temperature mechanical system, such as, for example, a gas turbine engine or the like. Typical superalloy substrates 12 include alloys based on Ni, Co, Ni/Fe, and the like. The superalloy substrate 12 may include other additive elements to alter its mechanical properties, such as toughness, hardness, temperature stability, corrosion resistance, oxidation resistance, and the like, as is well known in the art. Any useful superalloy substrate 12 may be utilized, including, for example, those available from Martin-Marietta Corp., Bethesda, Md., under the trade designation MAR-M247; those available from Cannon-Muskegon Corp., Muskegon, Mich., under the trade designations CMSX-4 and CMSX-10; and the like.
The substrate 12 may also include a ceramic matrix composite (CMC). The CMC may include any useful ceramic matrix material, including, for example, silicon carbide, silicon nitride, alumina, silica, and the like. The CMC may further include any desired filler material, and the filler material may include a continuous reinforcement or a discontinuous reinforcement. For example, the filler material may include discontinuous whiskers, platelets, or particulates. As another example, the filler material may include a continuous monofilament or multifilament weave.
The filler composition, shape, size, and the like may be selected to provide the desired properties to the CMC. For example, in some embodiments, the filler material may be chosen to increase the toughness of a brittle ceramic matrix. In other embodiments, the filler may be chosen to provide a desired property to the CMC, such as thermal conductivity, electrical conductivity, thermal expansion, hardness, or the like.
In some embodiments, the filler composition may be the same as the ceramic matrix material. For example, a silicon carbide matrix may surround silicon carbide whiskers. In other embodiments, the filler material may include a different composition than the ceramic matrix, such as mullite fibers in an alumina matrix, or the like. One preferred CMC includes silicon carbide continuous fibers embedded in a silicon carbide matrix.
The article 10 may include a bond coat 11 adjacent to or overlying substrate 12. The bond coat 11 may improve adhesion between the TBC/EBC 13 and the substrate 12. The bond coat 11 may include any useful alloy, such as a conventional MCrAlY alloy (where M is Ni, Co, or NiCo), a β-NiAl nickel aluminide alloy (either unmodified or modified by Pt, Cr, Hf, Zr, Y, Si, and combinations thereof), a γ-Ni+γ′-Ni3Al nickel aluminide alloy (either unmodified or modified by Pt, Cr, Hf, Zr, Y, Si, and combination thereof), or the like.
The bond coat 11 may also include ceramics or other materials that are compatible with a CMC substrate 12. For example, the bond coat 11 may include mullite, silicon, or the like. The bond coat 11 may further include other elements, such as silicates of rare earth elements including lutetium, ytterbium, erbium, dysprosium, gadolinium, europium, samarium, neodymium, cerium, lanthanum, scandium, yttrium, or the like. Some preferred bond coat 11 compositions for overlying a CMC substrate 12 include silicon, mullite, yttrium silicates and ytterbium silicates.
The bond coat 11 may be selected based on a number of considerations, including the chemical composition and phase constitution of the TBC/EBC 13 and the substrate 12. For example, when the substrate 12 includes a superalloy with γ-Ni+γ′-Ni3Al phase constitution, the bond coat 11 preferably includes aγ-Ni+γ′-Ni3Al phase constitution to better match the coefficient of thermal expansion of the superalloy substrate 12, and therefore increase the mechanical stability (adhesion) of the bond coat 11 to the substrate 12. Alternatively, when the substrate 12 includes a CMC, the bond coat 11 is preferably silicon or a ceramic, such as, for example, mullite.
In some embodiments, a bond coat 11 including a single layer may not fulfill all the functions desired of a bond coat 11. Thus, in some cases, the bond coat 11 may include multiple layers. For example, in some embodiments where the substrate 12 is a CMC comprising silicon carbide, a bond coat including a layer of silicon followed by a layer of mullite (aluminum silicate, Al6Si2O13), a rare earth silicate, or a mullite/rare earth silicate dual layer is deposited on the CMC substrate 12. A bond coat 11 comprising multiple layers may be desirable on a CMC substrate 12 to accomplish the desired functions of the bond coat 11, such as, for example, adhesion of the substrate 12 to the TBC/EBC 13, chemical compatibility of the bond coat 11 with each of the substrate 12 and the TBC/EBC 13, a desirable CTE match between adjacent layers, and the like.
In yet other embodiments, the article 10 may not include a bond coat 11. For example, in some embodiments, the TBC/EBC 13 may be applied directly to the substrate 12. A bond coat 11 may not be required or desired when the TBC/EBC 13 and the substrate 12 are chemically and/or mechanically compatible. For example, in embodiments where the TBC/EBC 13 and substrate 12 adhere sufficiently strongly to each other, a bond coat 11 may not be necessary. Additionally, in embodiments where the coefficients of thermal expansion of the substrate 12 and TBC/EBC 13 are sufficiently similar, a bond coat 11 may not be necessary. In this way, TBC/EBC 13 may be either adjacent to or overlie bond coat 11 or be adjacent to or overlie substrate 12.
TBC/EBC 13 may be selected to provide a desired type of protection to substrate 12. For example, when a substrate 12 including a superalloy is utilized, a thermal barrier coating may be desired to provide temperature resistance to substrate 12. A TBC, then, may provide thermal insulation to substrate 12 to lower the temperature experienced by substrate 12. On the other hand, when a substrate 12 including a CMC is utilized, an EBC or an EBC/TBC bilayer or multilayer coating may be desired to provide resistance to oxidation, water vapor attack, or the like.
A TBC may include any useful insulative layer. Common TBCs include ceramic layers comprising zirconia or hafnia. The zirconia or hafnia TBC may include other elements or compounds to modify a desired characteristic of the TBC, such as, for example, phase stability, thermal conductivity, or the like. Exemplary additive elements or compounds include, for example, rare earth oxides. The TBC may be applied by any useful technique, including, for example, plasma spraying, electron beam physical vapor deposition, chemical vapor deposition, and the like.
An EBC may include any useful layer which prevents environmental attack of the substrate. For example, the EBC may include materials that are resistant to oxidation or water vapor attack. Exemplary EBCs include mullite; glass ceramics such as barium strontium aluminosilicate (BaO—SrO—Al2O3-2SiO2), calcium aluminosilicate (CaAl2Si2O8), cordierite (magnesium aluminosilicate), and lithium aluminosilicate; and rare earth silicates. The EBC may be applied by any useful technique, such as plasma spraying, electron beam physical vapor deposition, chemical vapor deposition and the like.
Regardless of whether coating 14 includes an EBC or a TBC, a CMAS-resistant layer 15 may be provided adjacent to or overlying TBC/EBC 13 to protect the TBC/EBC 13 from infiltration of CMAS into the pores of the TBC/EBC 13. The CMAS-resistant layer 15 may react with any CMAS present on the coating 14 and form a reaction layer 16, as shown in
In some embodiments, the CMAS-resistant layer 15 may be a distinct layer, separate from TBC/EBC 13, as shown in
The CMAS-resistant layer 15 may include any element that reacts with CMAS to form a solid or a highly-viscous reaction product (i.e., a reaction product that is a solid or highly viscous at the temperatures experienced by the article 10). The reaction product may have a melting temperature significantly higher than CMAS (e.g., higher than about 1200-1250° C.). A solid or highly viscous reaction product is desired because the CMAS-resistant layer 15 is consumed as it reacts with CMAS to form reaction layer 16. If, for example, the reaction product of CMAS-resistant layer 15 and CMAS was a relatively low viscosity liquid, the low viscosity liquid would infiltrate the porous EBC/TBC 13 once the CMAS-resistant layer 15 is consumed by the reaction, which is the very occurrence the CMAS-resistant layer 15 is designed to prevent.
If the reaction product is a solid or highly viscous, however, a reaction layer 16 will form on the surface of CMAS-resistant layer 15, which will lower the reaction rate of the CMAS with the CMAS-resistant layer 15. That is, once a solid or highly viscous reaction layer 16 forms on the surface of the CMAS-resistant layer 15, the reaction between the CMAS-resistant layer 15 and CMAS will slow, because any further reaction will require the diffusion of CMAS through the reaction layer 16 to encounter the CMAS-resistant layer 15, or diffusion of a component of the CMAS-resistant layer 15 through the reaction layer 16 to encounter the CMAS. In either case, the diffusion of either CMAS or the component of the CMAS-resistant layer 15 is expected to be the limiting step in the reaction once a solid reaction layer 16 is formed on the surface of CMAS-resistant layer 15, because diffusion will be the slowest process.
The CMAS-resistant layer 15 includes at least one rare earth oxide. Useful rare earth oxides include oxides of rare earth elements, including, for example, Sc, Y, La, Ce, Pr, Nd, Pm, Sm, Eu, Gd, Tb, Dy, Ho, Er, Tm, Yb, Lu, and combinations thereof. In some embodiments, the CMAS-resistant layer 15 is essentially free of zirconia and hafnia. That is, in these embodiments, the coating includes at most trace amounts of zirconia and hafnia, such as, for example, the amounts present in commercially-available rare earth oxides.
The CMAS-resistant layer 15 may also include alumina and/or silica in addition to the at least one rare earth oxide. For example, the CMAS-resistant layer 15 may include alumina and at least one rare earth oxide, silica and at least one rare earth oxide, or alumina, silica, and at least one rare earth oxide. Alumina and/or silica may be added to the CMAS-resistant layer 15 to tailor one or more properties of the CMAS-resistant layer 15, such as, for example, the chemical reactivity of the layer 15 with CMAS, the viscosity of the reaction products, the coefficient of thermal expansion, the chemical compatibility of the layer 15 with the EBC/TBC 13, and the like.
Further, in some embodiments, the CMAS-resistant layer 15 may optionally include other additive components, such as, for example, Ta2O5, HfSiO4, alkali oxides, alkaline earth oxides, or mixtures thereof. The additive components may be added to the CMAS-resistant layer 15 to modify one or more desired properties of the layer 15. For example, the additive components may increase or decrease the reaction rate of the CMAS-resistant layer 15 With CMAS, may modify the viscosity of the reaction product from the reaction of CMAS and the CMAS-resistant layer 15, may increase adhesion of the CMAS-resistant layer 15 to the TBC/EBC 13, may increase or decrease the chemical stability of the CMAS resistant layer 15, or the like.
The CMAS-resistant layer 15 may include from about 1 mol. % to about 100 mol. % of the at least one rare earth oxide, ±1 mol. %. In some embodiments, the CMAS-resistant layer 15 may also include up to about 99 mol. % of at least one of alumina, silica and combinations thereof, ±1 mol. %, with a total of 100 mol. %.
In some preferred embodiments, the CMAS-resistant layer 15 may include about 10 mol. % to about 90 mol. % of at least one rare earth oxide, and about 10 mol. % to about 90 mol. % of at least one of alumina, silica, and combinations thereof and, optionally, about 0.1 mol. % to about 50 mol. % of the additive components. In other preferred embodiments, the CMAS-resistant layer 15 may include about 20 mol. % to about 80 mol. % of at least one rare earth oxide and about 20 mol. % to about 80 mol. % of at least one of alumina, silica, and combinations thereof and, optionally, about 1 mol. % to about 30 mol. % of the additive components.
The thickness of the CMAS-resistant layer 15 may vary widely depending on the conditions under which article 10 is to be used. For example, if CMAS deposits are expected to be extensive, CMAS-resistant layer 15 may be thicker. Additionally, if CMAS-resistant layer 15 is to replace TBC/EBC 13, as will be described in further detail below, the thickness of CMAS-resistant layer 15 may be determined by the thermal conditions to which article 10 is exposed. The thickness depending on the intended application may range from about 0.1 mils (1 mil=0.001 inch) to about 60 mils, ±0.1 mil. In some embodiments, the thickness of CMAS-resistant layer 15 may range from about 0.1 mils to about 30 mils. In other embodiments, the thickness of CMAS-resistant layer 15 may range from about 0.5 mils to about 15 mils.
It may also be preferred that the coefficient of thermal expansion of the CMAS-resistant layer is similar to the coefficient of thermal expansion of the TBC/EBC 13. Thus, the coefficient of thermal expansion of the component or components comprising the CMAS-resistant layer 15 may be an important consideration when designing the CMAS-resistant layer 15. Table 1 shows some exemplary rare earth silicates (e.g., a rare earth oxide mixed with silica (SiO2)) and their corresponding coefficients of thermal expansion.
The exemplary rare earth silicates have coefficients of thermal expansion that differ by as much as a factor of two (e.g., Gd2SiO5 (Gd2O3+SiO2) and Yb2Si2O7 (Yb2O3+2SiO2)). This permits a fairly wide range of tailoring of the coefficient of thermal expansion of CMAS-resistant layer 15 to be similar to the TBC/EBC 13. For example, a TBC including yttria-stabilized zirconia has a coefficient of thermal expansion of about 10×10−6/° C. Thus, either neodymium silicate (Nd2SiO5)-based or gadolinium silicate (Gd2SiO5)-based compositions may be particularly desirable for including in a CMAS-resistant layer 15, along with any desired additive components. As a second example, a CMC substrate may have a coefficient of thermal expansion of about 4×10−6/° C. to about 5×10−6/° C. In embodiments where the CMAS-resistant layer 15 is applied directly to a CMC substrate 12 or to a bond coat 11 attached to a CMC substrate 12 (as will be described in further detail below), ytterbium silicate (Yb2Si2O7)-based compositions may be a desirable choice to include in the CMAS-resistant layer 15, along with any other desired additive components.
Other coating geometries may also be used to reduce the stress placed on the interface of CMAS-resistant layer 15 and TBC/EBC 13 during thermal cycles due to different coefficients of thermal expansion. For example, as shown in
The transitional layer 28 may be applied as a separate layer from the CMAS-resistant layer 25 and the TBC/EBC 23. For example, the TBC/EBC 23 may be applied first by plasma spraying. The desired mixture of TBC/EBC 23 components and CMAS-resistant layer 25 components may then be mixed and applied to the TBC/EBC 23 by plasma spraying, followed by application of pure CMAS-resistant layer 25 on the transitional layer 28.
Additionally, as shown in
Sub-layer 38a is preferably compositionally most similar to TBC/EBC 33, e.g., sub-layer 38a may include more than 50% (by weight, volume, moles, or the like) of components that form TBC/EBC 33. For example, sub-layer 38a may include about 90% (by weight, volume, moles, or the like) TBC/EBC 33 components, and about 10% (by weight, volume, moles, or the like) CMAS-resistant layer 35 components. Sub-layer 38b, then, may include an approximately equal amount of components from TBC/EBC 33 and CMAS-resistant layer 35, or approximately 50% (by weight, volume, moles, or the like) TBC/EBC 33 components, and about 50% (by weight, volume, moles, or the like) CMAS-resistant layer 35 components. Finally, sub-layer 38c may be more compositionally similar to the CMAS-resistant layer. For example, sub-layer 38c may include more than 50% (by weight, volume, moles, or the like) of CMAS-resistant layer 35 components. In one embodiment, sub-layer 38c may include about 90% (by weight, volume, moles, or the like) CMAS-resistant layer 35 components and about 10% (by weight, volume, moles, or the like) TBC/EBC 33 components.
The inclusion of the transitional layer 28, 38 may reduce the coefficient of thermal expansion gradient, or in other words, make the compositional transition from the TBC/EBC 23, 33 to the CMAS-resistant layer 25, 35 more gradual, thus making the change of coefficients of thermal expansion more gradual.
As one example,
As a final example,
It may be understood that the more sub-layers included in the transitional layer, the lower the interfacial stresses due to mismatches of coefficients of thermal expansion. The number of sub-layers in the transitional layer need not be limited, but may be chosen according to the desired properties of the article and the time and expense involved in producing the article.
The article may also include a transition layer that is not divided into sub-layers, but which includes a continuously graded composition. For example, the transition layer may be compositionally most similar to the TBC/EBC at the TBC/EBC-transitional layer interface, and most similar to the CMAS-resistant layer at the CMAS-resistant layer-transitional layer interface, with a composition that continuously transitions from the TBC/EBC composition to the CMAS-resistant layer composition along the depth of the transitional layer.
As shown in
The article 50 may include a CMAS-resistant layer 55 applied to a bond coat 51, as shown in
When CMAS-resistant layer 55 replaces the TBC or EBC, the CMAS-resistant layer 55 may also include alumina, silica, or a mixture of alumina and silica.
In some embodiments, the CMAS-resistant layer 55 may optionally include up to about 50 mol. % additive components, such as, for example, Ta2O5, HfSiO4, alkali oxides, alkaline earth oxide, or mixtures thereof. The additive components may be added to the CMAS-resistant layer 55 to modify one or more desired properties. For example, the additive components may increase or decrease the reaction rate of the CMAS-resistant layer 55 With CMAS, may modify the viscosity of the reaction product from the reaction of CMAS and the CMAS-resistant layer 55, may increase adhesion of the CMAS-resistant layer 55 to the bond coat 51 or substrate 52, may increase or decrease the chemical stability of the CMAS resistant layer 55, or the like.
In some preferred embodiments, the CMAS-resistant layer 55 may include about 10 mol. % to about 90 mol. % of at least one rare earth oxide and about 10 mol. % to about 90 mol. % of at least one of alumina, silica, and combinations thereof, and optionally, about 0.1 mol. % to about 50 mol. % of the additive components. In other preferred embodiments, the CMAS-resistant layer 15 may include about 20 mol. % to about 80 mol. % of at least one rare earth oxide and about 20 mol. % to about 80 mol. % of at least one of alumina, silica, and combinations thereof, and optionally, about 1 mol. % to about 30 mol. % of the additive components. All measurements are ±1 mol. %
The CMAS-resistant layer may be applied to the bond coat 51 or substrate 52 using any useful technique, including, for example, electron beam physical vapor deposition, plasma spraying, chemical vapor deposition, and the like.
Various embodiments of the invention have been described. These and other embodiments are within the scope of the following claims.
This application is a continuation of U.S. application Ser. No. 12/016,649, filed on Jan. 18, 2008, entitled, “CMAS-RESISTANT THERMAL BARRIER COATINGS,” which is incorporated herein by reference in its entirety.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
3962059 | Kaup et al. | Jun 1976 | A |
3964877 | Bessen et al. | Jun 1976 | A |
4094673 | Erickson et al. | Jun 1978 | A |
4386968 | Hinkel et al. | Jun 1983 | A |
4588607 | Matarese et al. | May 1986 | A |
4663250 | Ong et al. | May 1987 | A |
4914794 | Strangman | Apr 1990 | A |
4996117 | Chu et al. | Feb 1991 | A |
5320909 | Scharman et al. | Jun 1994 | A |
5350599 | Rigney et al. | Sep 1994 | A |
5391404 | Lee et al. | Feb 1995 | A |
5496644 | Lee et al. | Mar 1996 | A |
5660885 | Hasz et al. | Aug 1997 | A |
5704759 | Draskovich et al. | Jan 1998 | A |
5714202 | Lemelson et al. | Feb 1998 | A |
5773141 | Hasz et al. | Jun 1998 | A |
5851678 | Hasz et al. | Dec 1998 | A |
5869146 | McCluskey et al. | Feb 1999 | A |
5871820 | Hasz et al. | Feb 1999 | A |
5876850 | Skowronski et al. | Mar 1999 | A |
5876860 | Marijnissen et al. | Mar 1999 | A |
5914189 | Hasz et al. | Jun 1999 | A |
5985470 | Spitsberg et al. | Nov 1999 | A |
6057047 | Maloney | May 2000 | A |
6261643 | Hasz et al. | Jul 2001 | B1 |
6284325 | Eaton, Jr. et al. | Sep 2001 | B1 |
6296942 | Eaton et al. | Oct 2001 | B1 |
6299988 | Wang et al. | Oct 2001 | B1 |
6312763 | Eaton, Jr. et al. | Nov 2001 | B1 |
6410148 | Eaton, Jr. et al. | Jun 2002 | B1 |
6465090 | Stowell et al. | Oct 2002 | B1 |
6468648 | McCluskey et al. | Oct 2002 | B1 |
6485848 | Wang et al. | Nov 2002 | B1 |
6562409 | Koshkarian et al. | May 2003 | B2 |
6587534 | Hassoun et al. | Jul 2003 | B2 |
6613445 | Sangeeta et al. | Sep 2003 | B2 |
6617036 | Eaton et al. | Sep 2003 | B2 |
6617037 | Sun et al. | Sep 2003 | B2 |
6627323 | Nagaraj et al. | Sep 2003 | B2 |
6645649 | Tanaka et al. | Nov 2003 | B2 |
6720038 | Darolia et al. | Apr 2004 | B2 |
6723674 | Wang et al. | Apr 2004 | B2 |
6733908 | Lee et al. | May 2004 | B1 |
6759151 | Lee | Jul 2004 | B1 |
6787195 | Wang et al. | Sep 2004 | B2 |
6812176 | Zhu et al. | Nov 2004 | B1 |
6835465 | Allen et al. | Dec 2004 | B2 |
6849334 | Horne et al. | Feb 2005 | B2 |
6869508 | Darolia et al. | Mar 2005 | B2 |
6887528 | Lau et al. | May 2005 | B2 |
6887595 | Darolia et al. | May 2005 | B1 |
6890668 | Bruce et al. | May 2005 | B2 |
6893750 | Nagaraj et al. | May 2005 | B2 |
6902662 | Eaton et al. | Jun 2005 | B2 |
6902836 | Eaton et al. | Jun 2005 | B2 |
6903162 | Nygard et al. | Jun 2005 | B2 |
6933061 | Nagaraj et al. | Aug 2005 | B2 |
6933066 | Nagaraj et al. | Aug 2005 | B2 |
6960395 | Spitsberg et al. | Nov 2005 | B2 |
6969555 | Meschter et al. | Nov 2005 | B2 |
7008674 | Nagaraj et al. | Mar 2006 | B2 |
7063894 | Sun et al. | Jun 2006 | B2 |
7090894 | Carper et al. | Aug 2006 | B2 |
7186466 | Zhu et al. | Mar 2007 | B2 |
7226668 | Nagaraj et al. | Jun 2007 | B2 |
7247393 | Hazel et al. | Jul 2007 | B2 |
7291408 | Litton et al. | Nov 2007 | B2 |
7306860 | Strangman et al. | Dec 2007 | B2 |
7354651 | Hazel et al. | Apr 2008 | B2 |
7357994 | Hazel et al. | Apr 2008 | B2 |
7364802 | Spitsberg et al. | Apr 2008 | B2 |
7374818 | Bhatia et al. | May 2008 | B2 |
7374825 | Hazel et al. | May 2008 | B2 |
7422671 | Bhatia et al. | Sep 2008 | B2 |
7442444 | Hazel et al. | Oct 2008 | B2 |
7449254 | Spitsberg et al. | Nov 2008 | B2 |
7510777 | Darolia et al. | Mar 2009 | B2 |
7510785 | Fukudome et al. | Mar 2009 | B2 |
7544394 | Boutwell et al. | Jun 2009 | B2 |
7579085 | Hazel | Aug 2009 | B2 |
7595114 | Meschter et al. | Sep 2009 | B2 |
7666512 | Bhatia et al. | Feb 2010 | B2 |
7695830 | Strangman et al. | Apr 2010 | B2 |
7740960 | Zhu et al. | Jun 2010 | B1 |
7780832 | Hasz | Aug 2010 | B2 |
7824744 | Darolia et al. | Nov 2010 | B2 |
7858212 | Schlichting et al. | Dec 2010 | B2 |
7862901 | Darolia et al. | Jan 2011 | B2 |
7867575 | Boutwell et al. | Jan 2011 | B2 |
7879411 | Hass et al. | Feb 2011 | B2 |
7927722 | Schlichting et al. | Apr 2011 | B2 |
7951459 | Tang et al. | May 2011 | B2 |
7968217 | Sarrafi-Nour et al. | Jun 2011 | B2 |
7981530 | Sporer et al. | Jul 2011 | B2 |
7994022 | Kakehata | Aug 2011 | B2 |
8017062 | Narendar et al. | Sep 2011 | B2 |
8034153 | Marchiando et al. | Oct 2011 | B2 |
8039113 | Kirby et al. | Oct 2011 | B2 |
8062759 | Fu et al. | Nov 2011 | B2 |
8084086 | Hass et al. | Dec 2011 | B2 |
8119247 | Kirby et al. | Feb 2012 | B2 |
8124252 | Cybulsky et al. | Feb 2012 | B2 |
8216689 | Witz et al. | Jul 2012 | B2 |
8273231 | Creech | Sep 2012 | B2 |
8470460 | Lee | Jun 2013 | B2 |
8501840 | Kirby et al. | Aug 2013 | B2 |
8586169 | Namba et al. | Nov 2013 | B2 |
8658255 | Kirby et al. | Feb 2014 | B2 |
8722270 | Pastula et al. | May 2014 | B2 |
8940417 | Courcot et al. | Jan 2015 | B2 |
8999457 | Kirby et al. | Apr 2015 | B2 |
9005716 | Kirby et al. | Apr 2015 | B2 |
9005717 | Kirby et al. | Apr 2015 | B2 |
9023435 | Kirby et al. | May 2015 | B2 |
9056802 | Kirby et al. | Jun 2015 | B2 |
9062564 | Kirby et al. | Jun 2015 | B2 |
9133541 | Kirby et al. | Sep 2015 | B2 |
9194242 | Lee | Nov 2015 | B2 |
9212100 | Kirby et al. | Dec 2015 | B2 |
20010033630 | Hassoun et al. | Oct 2001 | A1 |
20020098391 | Tanaka et al. | Jul 2002 | A1 |
20030113553 | Sun et al. | Jun 2003 | A1 |
20030113559 | Eaton et al. | Jun 2003 | A1 |
20030118841 | Horne et al. | Jun 2003 | A1 |
20030138658 | Taylor et al. | Jul 2003 | A1 |
20040038085 | Litton et al. | Feb 2004 | A1 |
20040043244 | Bruce et al. | Mar 2004 | A1 |
20040115351 | Lau et al. | Jun 2004 | A1 |
20040151840 | Wang et al. | Aug 2004 | A1 |
20040170849 | Ackerman et al. | Sep 2004 | A1 |
20050003172 | Wheeler et al. | Jan 2005 | A1 |
20050003175 | Wheeler et al. | Jan 2005 | A1 |
20050126494 | Darolia et al. | Jun 2005 | A1 |
20050129511 | Allen | Jun 2005 | A1 |
20050129973 | Eaton et al. | Jun 2005 | A1 |
20050142392 | Spitsberg et al. | Jun 2005 | A1 |
20050164027 | Lau et al. | Jul 2005 | A1 |
20050255648 | Bhatia et al. | Nov 2005 | A1 |
20060014029 | Saak et al. | Jan 2006 | A1 |
20060024513 | Schlichting et al. | Feb 2006 | A1 |
20060024527 | Schlichting et al. | Feb 2006 | A1 |
20060024528 | Strangman et al. | Feb 2006 | A1 |
20060029733 | Bhatia et al. | Feb 2006 | A1 |
20060046450 | Narendar et al. | Mar 2006 | A1 |
20060073361 | Fukudome et al. | Apr 2006 | A1 |
20060078750 | Zhu et al. | Apr 2006 | A1 |
20060115659 | Hazel et al. | Jun 2006 | A1 |
20060115661 | Hazel et al. | Jun 2006 | A1 |
20060154093 | Meschter et al. | Jul 2006 | A1 |
20060166018 | Spitsberg et al. | Jul 2006 | A1 |
20060210800 | Spitsberg et al. | Sep 2006 | A1 |
20060211241 | Govern et al. | Sep 2006 | A1 |
20060280952 | Hazel et al. | Dec 2006 | A1 |
20060280953 | Hazel et al. | Dec 2006 | A1 |
20060280954 | Spitsberg et al. | Dec 2006 | A1 |
20060280955 | Spitsberg et al. | Dec 2006 | A1 |
20060280963 | Hazel et al. | Dec 2006 | A1 |
20070014996 | Bhatia et al. | Jan 2007 | A1 |
20070071996 | Hazel et al. | Mar 2007 | A1 |
20070082131 | Doesberg et al. | Apr 2007 | A1 |
20070119713 | Hasz | May 2007 | A1 |
20070141367 | Darolia et al. | Jun 2007 | A1 |
20070160859 | Darolia et al. | Jul 2007 | A1 |
20070184204 | Balagopal et al. | Aug 2007 | A1 |
20070207330 | Tulyani et al. | Sep 2007 | A1 |
20070224411 | Hazel et al. | Sep 2007 | A1 |
20070227299 | Marchiando et al. | Oct 2007 | A1 |
20080124479 | Hazel et al. | May 2008 | A1 |
20080145674 | Darolia et al. | Jun 2008 | A1 |
20080206542 | Vance et al. | Aug 2008 | A1 |
20080274336 | Merrill et al. | Nov 2008 | A1 |
20090004427 | Sarrafi-Nour et al. | Jan 2009 | A1 |
20090102008 | Kakehata | Apr 2009 | A1 |
20090110953 | Margolies | Apr 2009 | A1 |
20090155554 | Gentleman et al. | Jun 2009 | A1 |
20090162539 | Boutwell et al. | Jun 2009 | A1 |
20090162556 | Boutwell et al. | Jun 2009 | A1 |
20090162684 | Creech | Jun 2009 | A1 |
20090169914 | Fu et al. | Jul 2009 | A1 |
20090176059 | Namba et al. | Jul 2009 | A1 |
20090178413 | Lee | Jul 2009 | A1 |
20090184280 | Lee | Jul 2009 | A1 |
20090186237 | Lee | Jul 2009 | A1 |
20090297866 | Raybould et al. | Dec 2009 | A1 |
20090324930 | Tulyani et al. | Dec 2009 | A1 |
20100080984 | Lee | Apr 2010 | A1 |
20100129636 | Cybulsky et al. | May 2010 | A1 |
20100136349 | Lee | Jun 2010 | A1 |
20100159150 | Kirby et al. | Jun 2010 | A1 |
20100159253 | Kirby et al. | Jun 2010 | A1 |
20110027467 | Kirby et al. | Feb 2011 | A1 |
20110027469 | Kirby et al. | Feb 2011 | A1 |
20110027470 | Kirby et al. | Feb 2011 | A1 |
20110027476 | Kirby et al. | Feb 2011 | A1 |
20110027484 | Kirby et al. | Feb 2011 | A1 |
20110027517 | Kirby et al. | Feb 2011 | A1 |
20110027557 | Kirby et al. | Feb 2011 | A1 |
20110027558 | Kirby et al. | Feb 2011 | A1 |
20110027559 | Kirby et al. | Feb 2011 | A1 |
20110027578 | Kirby et al. | Feb 2011 | A1 |
20110033630 | Naik et al. | Feb 2011 | A1 |
20110111310 | Pastula et al. | May 2011 | A1 |
20110256411 | Courcot et al. | Oct 2011 | A1 |
20120076943 | Kirby et al. | Mar 2012 | A1 |
20120077004 | Kirby et al. | Mar 2012 | A1 |
20120128879 | Cybulsky et al. | May 2012 | A1 |
20120244383 | Meschter et al. | Sep 2012 | A1 |
20130011578 | Hass et al. | Jan 2013 | A1 |
20130136915 | Naik | May 2013 | A1 |
20130189531 | Lee | Jul 2013 | A1 |
20130224457 | Lee | Aug 2013 | A1 |
20140065438 | Lee | Mar 2014 | A1 |
20140072816 | Lee | Mar 2014 | A1 |
20140199163 | Lee | Jul 2014 | A1 |
20150267058 | Lee | Sep 2015 | A1 |
20170044930 | Luthra et al. | Feb 2017 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
2712248 | Sep 2012 | CA |
0972853 | Jan 2000 | EP |
1335040 | Aug 2003 | EP |
1400611 | Mar 2004 | EP |
1428902 | Jun 2004 | EP |
1479661 | Nov 2004 | EP |
1626039 | Feb 2006 | EP |
1666638 | Jun 2006 | EP |
1795515 | Jun 2007 | EP |
1806435 | Jul 2007 | EP |
1806435 | Aug 2007 | EP |
1829847 | Sep 2007 | EP |
1975258 | Oct 2008 | EP |
2108715 | Oct 2009 | EP |
2189504 | May 2010 | EP |
2192098 | Jun 2010 | EP |
2194164 | Jun 2010 | EP |
2208805 | Jul 2010 | EP |
2245096 | Nov 2010 | EP |
2287131 | Feb 2011 | EP |
2287134 | Feb 2011 | EP |
2287138 | Feb 2011 | EP |
2468918 | Jun 2012 | EP |
2319248 | May 1998 | GB |
163216 | Mar 2013 | SG |
WO2007116547 | Oct 2007 | WF |
WO2012012431 | Jul 2001 | WO |
WO2006023894 | Mar 2006 | WO |
WO2007098152 | Aug 2007 | WO |
WO2008103163 | Aug 2008 | WO |
WO2008109214 | Sep 2008 | WO |
WO2009091721 | Jul 2009 | WO |
WO2009091724 | Jul 2009 | WO |
WO2010039699 | Apr 2010 | WO |
2011085109 | Jul 2011 | WO |
2011085376 | Jul 2011 | WO |
WO2011123432 | Oct 2011 | WO |
2012027442 | Mar 2012 | WO |
2012122373 | Sep 2012 | WO |
WO2012129431 | Sep 2012 | WO |
Entry |
---|
Anderson, et al., “Ultrasonic Measurement of the Kearns Texture Factors in Zircaloy, Zirconium, and Titanium,” vol. 30A, Aug. 1999, Metallurgical and Materials Transactions, 8 pp. |
Lee, et al., “Rare earth silicate environmental barrier coatings for Si/C/SiC composites and Si3N4 ceramics,” Journal of the European Ceramic Society 25, 2005, pp. 1705-1715. |
Shelby, et al., “Rare earth Aluminosilicate glasses,” Journal of American Ceramic Society, vol. 73, No. 1, 1990, pp. 39-42. |
International Preliminary Report on Patentability from corresponding international application No. PCT/US2009/030826, dated Jul. 29, 2010, 7 pp. |
Notification of Transmittal of the International Search Report and PCT Written Opinion, or the Declaration from corresponding international patent application No. PCT/US2009/030826, dated Jul. 27, 2009, 16 pp. |
U.S. Appl. No. 14/006,848, by Kang N. Lee, filed Mar. 22, 2012. |
Prosecution History from U.S. Appl. No. 12/016,649, dated Aug. 8, 2008 through Jun. 20, 2013, 128 pp. |
Prosecution History from U.S. Appl. No. 13/811,361, dated Jan. 21, 2013 through May 7, 2013, 16 pp. |
Prosecution History from U.S. Appl. No. 13/638,277, dated Sep. 28, 2012 through Sep. 28, 2012 8 pp. |
Prosecution History from U.S. Pat. No. 8,470,460, dated Oct. 31, 2012 through May 28, 2013, 25 pp. |
Invitation to Pay Additional Fees and, Where Applicable, Protest Fee and Annex to the Invitation to Pay Additional Fees and Communication Relating to the Results of the Partial International Search for counterpart application No. PCT/US2009/030826 dated Jun. 8, 2009, 5 pp. |
Office Action from corresponding Canadian application No. 2,712,248, dated Jun. 10, 2011, 3 pp. |
Examination Report from corresponding Singapore application No. 201005160-5, dated Jun. 19, 2012, 6 pp. |
Notification Concerning Transmittal of International Preliminary Report on Patentability (Chapter I of the Patent Cooperation Treaty) from corresponding PCT Application No. PCT/US2009/030826, dated Jul. 29, 2010, (8 pages). |
Office Action from the Intellectual Property Office of Singapore (IPOS) with Invitation to Respond to the Search Report and Written Opinion for corresponding Singapore application No. 201005160-5, dated Nov. 15, 2011, 6 pp. |
Directed Vapor Technologies International, Inc., “Coating Technology for the Future”, downloaded on Dec. 9, 2013 at http://www.directedvapor.com/Capabilities_Brochure.pdf, 7 pp. |
Kramer et al., “Thermochemical Interaction of Thermal Barrier Coatings with Molten CaO—MgO—A1203—SiO2 (CMAS) Deposits,” Journal of the American Ceramic Society, vol. 89, No. 10, Aug. 9, 2006, 9 pp. |
Harder et al., “Chemical and Mechanical Consequences of Environmental Barrier Coating Exposure to Calcium-Magnesium-Aluminosilicate,” Journal of the American Ceramic Society, vol. 94, No. S1, Mar. 17, 2011, 8 pp. |
Grant, et al., “CMAS degradation of environmental barrier coatings,” Surface and Coatings Technology, vol. 202, Jul. 4, 2007, 5 pp. |
Office Action from U.S. Appl. No. 13/638,277, dated Oct. 9, 2014, 15 pp. |
Office Action from U.S. Appl. No. 13/811,361, dated Oct. 16, 2014, 12 pp. |
Amendment in Response to Office Action dated Oct. 16, 2014, from U.S. Appl. No. 13/811,361, filed Feb. 16, 2015, 16 pp. |
Amendment in Response to Office Action dated Oct. 9, 2014, from U.S. Appl. No. 13/638,277, filed Feb. 5, 2015, 14 pp. |
Final Office Action from U.S. Appl. No. 13/638,277, dated Jun. 1, 2015, 16 pp. |
Final Office Action from U.S. Appl. No. 13/811,361, dated Apr. 13, 2015, 19 pp. |
Response to Final Office Action dated Jun. 1, 2015, from U.S. Appl. No. 13/638,277, filed Jul. 29, 2015, 13 pp. |
Response to Final Office Action dated Apr. 13, 2015, from U.S. Appl. No. 13/811,361, filed Jun. 30, 2015, 12 pp. |
Response to Final Office Action dated Apr. 13, 2015 and Advisory Action dated Jul. 16, 2015, from U.S. Appl. No. 13/811,361, filed Aug. 13, 2015, 9 pp. |
Notice of Allowance from U.S. Appl. No. 13/811,361, dated Sep. 2, 2015, 5 pp. |
Intent to Grant dated Dec. 21, 2017, from counterpart European Application No. 09702198.4, 6 pp. |
Final Office Action from U.S. Appl. No. 13/638,277, dated Dec. 6, 2017, 19 pp. |
Examination Report from counterpart European Application No. 09702198.4, dated Dec. 7, 2016, 5 pp. |
Response to Examination Report dated Dec. 7, 2017, from counterpart European Application No. 09702198.4, filed Mar. 21, 2017, 5 pp. |
Amendment in Response to Office Action dated May 25, 2017, from U.S. Appl. No. 13/638,277, filed Aug. 24, 2017, 17 pp. |
Ndamka, “Microstructural Damage of Thermal Barrier Coating Due to CMAS Attack,” Cranfield University, School of Applied Sciences Surface Engineering and Nanotechnology Institute (SENTI), Oct. 2013, pp. 332. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20140065438 A1 | Mar 2014 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 12016649 | Jan 2008 | US |
Child | 14033043 | US |