An improved exhaust mixing system is disclosed. Although the improvements are applicable to exhaust mixing systems for turbine engines used for propulsive power in air, the improvements are also applicable to exhaust mixing systems for turbine engines employed in marine, underwater, and land applications.
It has become increasingly desirable to improve the overall system, design, and operation of exhaust mixing systems for jet turbines such as turbofan engines. In an exhaust mixing system coupled to a typical turbofan engine, the exhaust mixing system may serve to increase thrust and decrease engine noise. As such, engine operation may be improved and/or engine wear may be minimized. An inefficient or ineffective exhaust mixing system, however, can lead to decreased engine efficiency and increased noise.
Accordingly, there is room for further improvements in this area.
While the claims are not limited to a specific illustration, an appreciation of the various aspects is best gained through a discussion of various examples thereof. Referring now to the drawings, exemplary illustrations are shown in detail. Although the drawings represent the illustrations, the drawings are not necessarily to scale and certain features may be exaggerated to better illustrate and explain an innovative aspect of an example. Further, the exemplary illustrations described herein are not intended to be exhaustive or otherwise limiting or restricted to the precise form and configuration shown in the drawings and disclosed in the following detailed description. Exemplary illustrations are described in detail by referring to the drawings as follows:
An exemplary gas turbine having an improved exhaust mixing system is disclosed. The mixing system includes an attachment system for securing a lobed mixer to an engine interface. A novel method of manufacturing an exhaust mixing system is further disclosed.
Ambient air 30 enters the fan 12 and is directed across a fan rotor 32 in an annular duct 34, which in part is circumscribed by fan case 36. The bypass airflow 38 provides a large fraction of engine thrust while the primary gas stream 40 (a.k.a. core airflow) is directed to the combustor 18 and the turbines 20, 21, 22, and then exhausted through a nozzle generating thrust. The engine 10 includes an improved exhaust mixing system 44. The system 44 may include a lobed mixer 46 which can be coupled to an engine interface or support 48 (e.g., rear turbine support). The exhaust mixing system 44 enhances the mixing of the core airflow 40 that passes through the low pressure turbine 22 with the bypass airflow 38 that passes over the lobed mixer 46, thus increasing thrust. The mixing of the core airflow 40 and the bypass airflow 38, while each pass over a tail cone 50 and exit at exhaust nozzle 52, may also reduce turbine noise.
With reference now to
The lobed exhaust mixer 204 is fabricated from, for example, ceramic matrix composite (CMC) materials, such as high strength ceramics alumina fibers in an alumina oxide composite matrix. Alternate embodiments may include other CMC materials such as alumino-silicate fibers in a ceramic matrix. Regardless of the CMC materials employed, the CMC lobed exhaust mixer 204 includes a plurality of lobes 208 that enhance mixing of core airflow and bypass airflow in such a manner to increase thrust and decrease engine noise. According to alternate embodiments, the number of lobes of the CMC lobed exhaust mixer may be more or less than the number of lobes illustrated in
The CMC lobed exhaust mixer 204 is configured to mix generally warm or hot core airflow (e.g., primary gas stream 40 of
Structures comprised of CMC materials generally weigh less than similar structures comprised of metallic materials. Further, structures comprised of CMC materials also tend to outperform many comparable metallic structures in their ability to maintain structural shape at higher temperatures. As such, the CMC lobed exhaust mixer 204 generally weighs less and is more durable than comparable mixers comprised of metallic materials. The reduction of weight, in turn, generally enhances fuel efficiencies of the turbofan engine (e.g., gas turbine engine 10 of
As illustrated in
The plurality of projections 212 of the coupling attachment 206 project from the annulus 210 in a first direction 214 that is substantially parallel to a central axis 216 of the annulus 210. The coupling attachment 206 couples the CMC lobed exhaust mixer 204 to an engine support or interface 202 of a turbofan engine (alternatively see, e.g., support 48 of engine 10 illustrated in
It is contemplated that the quantity of projections in the plurality of projections 212 is proportional to the quantity of lobes in the CMC lobed exhaust mixer 204. For example, there may be two to four times as many projections 212 as there are lobes 208. It is noted, however, that there need not be a 2:1, 3:1, or 4:1 relationship between the number of projections and the number of lobes. For example, based on weight and/or size factors of the CMC lobed mixer (e.g., CMC lobed exhaust mixer 204), fewer or more projection may be employed.
In addition to coupling the CMC lobed exhaust mixer 204 to the engine (e.g., engine 10 of
Referring now to
With reference now to
The annulus 306 includes a first leg 314 in union with a second leg 316. The second leg 316 is substantially perpendicular to the first leg 314, while the first leg 314 is substantially parallel with the first direction 310.
The finger coupling 308 includes a void 318 that aligns with a void 320 in the CMC lobed exhaust mixer 304. As such, a fastener or mounting hardware (e.g., the plurality of projection mounting hardware 222 of
Due to the geometry of the finger couplings (e.g., finger coupling 308) and the manner in which the CMC lobed exhaust mixer 304 is coupled to the engine interface 312, loads due to aerodynamic pressure and thermal growth are reduced and substantially in shear.
According to the embodiment illustrated in
Referring now to
As illustrated in
It is noted that, according to the embodiment depicted in
With reference now to
Process control begins at block 402, where the method includes forming a ring having a first leg and a second leg substantially perpendicular to the first leg. Process control then proceeds to block 404, where the method further includes forming a plurality of coupling fingers projecting from the second leg of the ring in a direction substantially parallel to the first leg. Together, the ring and the plurality of coupling fingers form an annular lobed mixer attachment flange. It is contemplated that the ring and coupling fingers may be formed as separate features and then later joined. As such, forming of the coupling fingers may occur prior to, or at the same time as, the forming of the ring. Alternatively, a mold may be employed to fabricate the attachment flange with the ring and coupling fingers as a single unit (or a plurality of semi-annular units).
After fabricating the attachment flange (i.e., blocks 402, 404), process control proceeds to block 406, where the method of manufacturing includes fabricating a CMC lobed mixer. It is noted that, though the flowchart 400 depicts the fabrication of the CMC lobed mixer (i.e., block 406) occurring prior to the fabrication of the attachment flange (i.e., block 402, 404), alternate methods of manufacture may fabricate the CMC mixer prior to, or at the same time as, the fabrication off the attachment flange. For example, the Oxide-Oxide CMC mixer may be formed or shaped as a laminate. The laminate process is similar to a process that employs polymer composites, except it is sintered at high temperature and trimmed to design.
With continued reference to the flowchart 400 of
After the CMC lobed mixer is affixed to the attachment flange, process control proceeds to block 410, where the method includes affixing the second leg of the attachment flange ring to an engine interface (e.g., a rear turbine support). The engine interface is an interface employed to couple the exhaust mixer system (i.e., the CMC lobed mixer and the attachment flange) to the turbofan engine. In other words, the CMC lobed mixer and attachment flange are coupled to a turbofan engine via the engine interface. The attachment flange serves as an intermediary between the engine interface and the CMC lobed mixer and, as such, allows loads to pass through the system while minimizing local stresses. It is noted that rivets, nuts and bolts, and/or another type of fastener may be used to fasten the attachment flange to the engine interface.
Process control then proceeds to an end after affixing the ring to the engine interface.
It is noted that, according to an alternate embodiment, the attachment flange may be attached to the engine interface prior to, or at the same time as, attachment of the CMC lobed mixer to the attachment flange.
With regard to the processes, systems, methods, heuristics, etc. described herein, it should be understood that, although the steps of such processes, etc. have been described as occurring according to a certain ordered sequence, such processes could be practiced with the described steps performed in an order other than the order described herein. It further should be understood that certain steps could be performed simultaneously, that other steps could be added, or that certain steps described herein could be omitted. In other words, the descriptions of processes herein are provided for the purpose of illustrating certain embodiments, and should in no way be construed so as to limit the claims.
All terms used in the claims are intended to be given their broadest reasonable constructions and their ordinary meanings as understood by those knowledgeable in the technologies described herein unless an explicit indication to the contrary in made herein. In particular, use of the singular articles such as “a,” “the,” “said,” etc. should be read to recite one or more of the indicated elements unless a claim recites an explicit limitation to the contrary.
This application claims priority to U.S. Provisional Patent Application No. 62/089,452 filed Dec. 9, 2014, the contents of which are hereby incorporated in their entirety.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
4566270 | Ballard et al. | Jan 1986 | A |
4907743 | Bouiller et al. | Mar 1990 | A |
5440875 | Torkelson | Aug 1995 | A |
6606854 | Siefker et al. | Aug 2003 | B1 |
7677026 | Conete et al. | Mar 2010 | B2 |
8141370 | Bulman | Mar 2012 | B2 |
8590316 | Conete | Nov 2013 | B2 |
8726665 | Moore | May 2014 | B2 |
9995245 | Dindar | Jun 2018 | B2 |
20070117480 | Carper et al. | May 2007 | A1 |
20070240423 | Bulman | Oct 2007 | A1 |
20080115484 | Conete et al. | May 2008 | A1 |
20090064681 | Keith | Mar 2009 | A1 |
20100310764 | Arnold et al. | Dec 2010 | A1 |
20110203255 | Conete | Aug 2011 | A1 |
20120160933 | Vauchel et al. | Jun 2012 | A1 |
20120297791 | Suciu et al. | Nov 2012 | A1 |
20130020408 | Jasklowski et al. | Jan 2013 | A1 |
20140053563 | De Sousa et al. | Feb 2014 | A1 |
20140241863 | Tardif | Aug 2014 | A1 |
20150152788 | De Sousa | Jun 2015 | A1 |
20160131077 | Debray | May 2016 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
1797310 | Jun 2007 | EP |
Entry |
---|
European Search Report for EP15197419. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20160160690 A1 | Jun 2016 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
62089452 | Dec 2014 | US |