The present invention relates generally to CMP pad conditioners used to remove material from (e.g., smooth, polish, dress, etc.) CMP pads. Accordingly, the present invention involves the fields of chemistry, physics, and materials science.
The semiconductor industry currently spends in excess of one billion U.S. Dollars each year manufacturing silicon wafers that must exhibit very flat and smooth surfaces. Known techniques to manufacture smooth and even-surfaced silicon wafers are plentiful. The most common of these involves the process known as Chemical Mechanical Polishing (CMP) which includes the use of a polishing pad in combination with an abrasive slurry. Of central importance in all CMP processes is the attainment of high performance levels in aspects such as uniformity of polished wafer, smoothness of the IC circuitry, removal rate for productivity, longevity of consumables for CMP economics, etc.
In accordance with one embodiment, the present invention provides a CMP pad conditioner, including a plurality of abrasive segments. In one aspect, for example, a CMP pad conditioner is provided including a plurality of blade abrasive segments, where each blade abrasive segment includes an elongated blade segment blank and an abrasive layer attached to the blade segment blank, the abrasive layer including a superhard abrasive material. The conditioner can also include a plurality of particle abrasive segments, where each particle abrasive segment includes a particle segment blank and an abrasive layer attached to the particle segment blank, the abrasive layer including a plurality of superabrasive particles. Furthermore, the conditioner can include a pad conditioner substrate, where each of the plurality of blade abrasive segments and the particle abrasive segments are permanently affixed to the pad conditioner substrate in an alternating pattern and in an orientation that enables removal of material from a CMP pad by the abrasive layers as the pad conditioner and the CMP pad are moved relative to one another.
In another aspect of the present invention, a method of conditioning a CMP pad surface is provided. Such a method can include moving a dresser surface and the CMP pad surface relative to one another, such that the dresser surface alternately shaves and furrows the CMP pad surface.
In yet another aspect, a method of forming a CMP pad conditioner can include positioning a plurality of blade abrasive segments and a plurality of particle abrasive segments as described in an alternating arrangement on a face of a pad conditioner substrate in an orientation that enables removal of material from a CMP pad by the abrasive layers as the pad conditioner and the CMP pad are moved relative to one another. The method can further include permanently affixing the plurality of blade abrasive segments and the plurality of particle abrasive segments to the pad conditioner substrate.
There has thus been outlined, rather broadly, various features of the invention so that the detailed description thereof that follows may be better understood, and so that the present contribution to the art may be better appreciated. Other features of the present invention will become clearer from the following detailed description of the invention, taken with any accompanying or following claims, or may be learned by the practice of the invention.
It will be understood that the above figures are merely for illustrative purposes in furthering an understanding of the invention. Further, the figures may not be drawn to scale, thus dimensions, particle sizes, and other aspects may, and generally are, exaggerated to make illustrations thereof clearer. For example, an abrasive layer is illustrated in some of the figures as including a plurality of abrasive particles: however, many of the specific embodiments disclosed herein do not necessarily include abrasive particles. Therefore, it will be appreciated that departure can and likely will be made from the specific dimensions and aspects shown in the figures in order to produce the pad conditioners of the present invention.
Before the present invention is disclosed and described, it is to be understood that this invention is not limited to the particular structures, process steps, or materials disclosed herein, but is extended to equivalents thereof as would be recognized by those ordinarily skilled in the relevant arts. It should also be understood that terminology employed herein is used for the purpose of describing particular embodiments only and is not intended to be limiting.
It must be noted that, as used in this specification and any appended or following claims, the singular forms “a,” “an” and “the” include plural referents unless the context clearly dictates otherwise. Thus, for example, reference to “an abrasive segment” can include one or more of such segments.
In describing and claiming the present invention, the following terminology will be used in accordance with the definitions set forth below.
All mesh sizes that may be referred to herein are U.S. mesh sizes unless otherwise indicated. Further, mesh sizes are generally understood to indicate an average mesh size of a given collection of particles since each particle within a particular “mesh size” may actually vary over a small distribution of sizes.
As used herein, the term “substantially” refers to the complete or nearly complete extent or degree of an action, characteristic, property, state, structure, item, or result. As an arbitrary example, when two or more objects are referred to as being spaced a “substantially” constant distance from one another, it is understood that the two or more objects are spaced a completely unchanging distance from one another, or so nearly an unchanging distance from one another that a typical person would be unable to appreciate the difference. The exact allowable degree of deviation from absolute completeness may in some cases depend upon the specific context. However, generally speaking the nearness of completion will be so as to have the same overall result as if absolute and total completion were obtained.
The use of “substantially” is equally applicable when used in a negative connotation to refer to the complete or near complete lack of an action, characteristic, property, state, structure, item, or result. As an arbitrary example, a cavity that is “substantially free of” foreign matter would either completely lack any foreign matter, or so nearly completely lack foreign matter that the effect would be the same as if it completely lacked foreign matter. In other words, a cavity that is “substantially free of” foreign matter may still actually contain minute portions of foreign matter so long as there is no measurable effect upon the cavity as a result thereof.
As used herein, a pad conditioner “substrate” means a portion of a pad conditioner that supports abrasive materials, and to which abrasive materials and/or segment blanks that carry abrasive materials may be affixed. Substrates useful in the present invention may of a variety of shapes, thicknesses, or materials that are capable of supporting abrasive materials in a manner that is sufficient to provide a pad conditioner useful for its intended purpose. Substrates may be of a solid material, a powdered material that becomes solid when processed, or a flexible material. Examples of typical substrate materials include without limitation, metals, metal alloys, ceramics, relatively hard polymers or other organic materials, glasses, and mixtures thereof. Further, the substrate may include a material that aids in attaching abrasive materials to the substrate, including, without limitation, brazing alloy material, sintering aids and the like.
As used herein, “segment blank” refers to a structure similar in many respects to the pad conditioner substrates defined above. Segment blanks are utilized in the present invention to carry abrasive layers: attachment of the abrasive layers to the pad conditioner substrates is typically achieved by way of attaching the segment blanks to the pad conditioner substrates. It is important to note that a variety of techniques of attaching the segment blanks to the substrates, and a variety of techniques of attaching the abrasive layers to the segment blanks, are discussed herein. It is to be understood that all of these various attachment mechanisms can be used interchangeably herein: that is, if a method of attaching a segment blank to a substrate is discussed herein, the method of attachment discussed can also be used to attach an abrasive layer to a segment blank. For any particular CMP pad dresser being discussed, however, it is understood that attachment methods of the abrasive layers to the segment blanks can differ from, or can be the same as, the method used to attach the segment blanks to the pad conditioner substrate.
As used herein, “geometric configuration” refers to a shape that is capable of being described in readily understood and recognized mathematical terms. Examples of shapes qualifying as “geometric configurations” include, without limitation, cubic shapes, polyhedral (including regular polyhedral) shapes, triangular shapes (including equilateral triangles, isosceles triangles and three-dimensional triangular shapes), pyramidal shapes, spheres, rectangles, “pie” shapes, wedge shapes, octagonal shapes, circles, etc.
As used herein, “vapor deposition” refers to a process of depositing materials on a substrate through the vapor phase. Vapor deposition processes can include any process such as, but not limited to, chemical vapor deposition (CVD) and physical vapor deposition (PVD). A wide variety of variations of each vapor deposition method can be performed by those skilled in the art. Examples of vapor deposition methods include hot filament CVD, rf-CVD, laser CVD (LCVD), metal-organic CVD (MOCVD), sputtering, thermal evaporation PVD, ionized metal PVD (IMPVD), electron beam PVD (EBPVD), reactive PVD, and the like.
As used herein, “abrasive profile” is to be understood to refer to a shape, configuration, or a space defined by abrasive materials that can be used to remove material from a CMP pad. Examples of abrasive profiles include, without limitation, rectangular shapes, tapering rectangular shapes, truncated wedge shapes, wedge shapes, a “saw tooth” profile and the like. In some embodiments, the abrasive profile exhibited by abrasive segments of the present invention will be apparent when viewed through a plane in which the CMP pad will be oriented during removal of material from the CMP pad.
As used herein, an “abrading surface or point” may be used to refer to a surface, edge, face, point or peak of an abrasive segment that contacts and removes material from a CMP pad. Generally speaking, the abrading surface or point is the portion of the abrasive segment that first contacts the CMP pad as the abrasive segment and the CMP pad are brought into contact with one another.
As used herein, “superhard” may be used to refer to any crystalline, or polycrystalline material, or mixture of such materials which has a Mohr's hardness of about 8 or greater. In some aspects, the Mohr's hardness may be about 9.5 or greater. Such materials include but are not limited to diamond, polycrystalline diamond (PCD), cubic boron nitride (cBN), polycrystalline cubic boron nitride (PcBN), corundum and sapphire, as well as other superhard materials known to those skilled in the art. Superhard materials may be incorporated into the present invention in a variety of forms including particles, grits, films, layers, pieces, segments, etc. In some cases, the superhard materials of the present invention are in the form of polycrystalline superhard materials, such as PCD and PcBN materials.
As used herein, “organic material” refers to a semisolid or solid complex or mix of organic compounds. As such, “organic material layer” and “organic material matrix” may be used interchangeably, refer to a layer or mass of a semisolid or solid complex amorphous mix of organic compounds, including resins, polymers, gums, etc. Preferably the organic material will be a polymer or copolymer formed from the polymerization of one or more monomers. In some cases, such organic material may be adhesive.
As used herein, the process of “brazing” is intended to refer to the creation of chemical bonds between the carbon atoms of the superabrasive particles/materials and the braze material. Further, “chemical bond” means a covalent bond, such as a carbide or boride bond, rather than mechanical or weaker inter-atom attractive forces. Thus, when “brazing” is used in connection with superabrasive particles a true chemical bond is being formed. However, when “brazing” is used in connection with metal to metal bonding the term is used in the more traditional sense of a metallurgical bond. Therefore, brazing of a superabrasive segment to a tool body does not necessarily require the presence of a carbide former.
As used herein, “particle” and “grit” may be used interchangeably.
As used herein, an “abrasive layer” describes a variety of structures capable of removing (e.g., cutting, polishing, scraping) material from a CMP pad. An abrasive layer can include a mass having several cutting points, ridges or mesas formed thereon or therein. It is notable that such cutting points, ridges or mesas may be from a multiplicity of protrusions or asperities included in the mass. Furthermore, an abrasive layer can include a plurality of individual abrasive particles that may have only one cutting point, ridge or mesa formed thereon or therein. An abrasive layer can also include composite masses, such as PCD pieces, segment or blanks, either individually comprising the abrasive layer or collectively comprising the abrasive layer.
As used herein, “metallic” includes any type of metal, metal alloy, or mixture thereof, and specifically includes but is not limited to steel, iron, and stainless steel.
As used herein, a plurality of items, structural elements, compositional elements, and/or materials may be presented in a common list for convenience. However, these lists should be construed as though each member of the list is individually identified as a separate and unique member. Thus, no individual member of such list should be construed as a de facto equivalent of any other member of the same list solely based on their presentation in a common group without indications to the contrary.
Concentrations, amounts, particle sizes, volumes, and other numerical data may be expressed or presented herein in a range format. It is to be understood that such a range format is used merely for convenience and brevity and thus should be interpreted flexibly to include not only the numerical values explicitly recited as the limits of the range, but also to include all the individual numerical values or sub-ranges encompassed within that range as if each numerical value and sub-range is explicitly recited.
As an illustration, a numerical range of “about 1 micrometer to about 5 micrometers” should be interpreted to include not only the explicitly recited values of about 1 micrometer to about 5 micrometers, but also include individual values and sub-ranges within the indicated range. Thus, included in this numerical range are individual values such as 2, 3, and 4 and sub-ranges such as from 1-3, from 2-4, and from 3-5, etc. This same principle applies to ranges reciting only one numerical value. Furthermore, such an interpretation should apply regardless of the breadth of the range or the characteristics being described.
The present invention generally provides pad conditioners and associated methods that can be utilized in conditioning (e.g., smoothing, polishing, dressing) or otherwise affecting a CMP pad to remove material from the CMP pad in order to provide a finished, smooth and/or flat surface to the pad. Pad conditioners of the present invention can be advantageously utilized, for example, in dressing CMP pads that are used in polishing, finishing or otherwise affecting silicon wafers.
It has now been discovered that improved CMP pad dressing can be accomplished using by alternating cutting and furrowing in the same dressing operation. Such can be accomplished by utilizing a CMP pad dresser having a dressing surface containing blade abrasive segments and particle abrasive segments arranged in an alternating fashion. Thus as the CMP pad dresser moves relative to the CMP pad, the surface of the CMP pad is alternately cut with the blade abrasive segments and furrowed with the particle abrasive segments.
Additionally, by alternating particle abrasive segments between adjacent blade abrasive segments, compression of the CMP pad by the blade abrasive segments is minimized. As an explanatory example, a CMP pad dresser having blade abrasive segments spaced far apart requires more downward compression into the pad to facilitate cutting as compared to a CMP pad dresser having blade abrasive segments closer together due to the upwelling of CMP pad material between the abrasive segments. A CMP pad dresser having abrasive segments positioned more closely together facilitates the cutting of the pad with less compression, thus reducing damage to the pad from overcutting. By alternating particle abrasive segments in between adjacent blade abrasive segments, the compression required to dress the CMP pad is reduced because upwelling of the pad material between the abrasive segments is minimized. Such a configuration is particularly effective when using CMP pads made from the soft materials required for many current delicate polishing procedures. Such soft materials are more effectively dressed using lower dresser compression due to the nature of the material which can experience high degrees of deformation when pressure from a dresser is applied. In one aspect, for example, the soft material can be about as soft as a conventional polyurethane pad. In another aspect, the soft material can be softer than a conventional polyurethane pad. In yet another aspect, the soft material can be at least about 10% softer than a conventional polyurethane pad. In a further aspect, the soft material can be at least about 25% softer than a conventional polyurethane pad. In yet a further aspect, the soft material can be at least about 50% softer than a conventional polyurethane pad. In one specific aspect, as is shown in
The CMP pad conditioner can also include multiple annular rings of abrasive segments, as opposed to the single annular ring shown in
The pad conditioner substrate 16 can vary according to the applications for which the pad conditioner is designed, but in one aspect includes a face on which the abrasive segments can be affixed to allow the pad conditioner to be used to grind, plane, cut or otherwise remove material from a CMP pad (not shown). The abrasive segments can be permanently fixed to the pad conditioner 16 in an orientation that enables removal of material from the CMP pad by the abrasive layer as the pad conditioner and the pad are moved relative to one another. For example, as has been described and as shown in
The present invention provides a number of advantages over conventional devices. One such advantage lies in the ability to customize methods of attachment of the abrasive layer to the segment blank independently of methods of attachment of the segment blank or blanks to the pad conditioner substrate. For example, as various attachment methods may involve very high temperatures and/or pressures, very demanding environmental conditions, or simply are very labor intensive when attempted with pad conditioners of large or complex surface areas, performing the attachment method on distinct, easily handled segment blanks can improve costs, efficiencies and integrities of the attachment process. Also, leveling of the components of the abrasive layer on each segment blank can be performed more easily when done in discrete, relatively small lots. The resulting plurality of abrasive segments can likewise be more easily positioned, leveled, spaced, oriented, etc., across the face of the pad conditioner substrate after the abrasive layer is individually attached to each of the abrasive segments.
In addition, by obtaining a plurality of abrasive segments, each with an abrasive layer already attached thereto, an abrasive pattern across the face of the pad conditioner substrate can be designed to optimize various conditioning procedures. For example, the spacing between adjacent abrasive segments can be carefully selected to aid in, or better control, the flow of various fluids (e.g., slurry) around and through the abrasive segments to increase the efficacy and efficiency of the material removing process. Also, as shown in
Numerous configurations of abrasive segments are contemplated, depending on the nature of the CMP pad and the desired dressing characteristics. In one aspect, as exemplified in
In another aspect, as exemplified in
The cutting action of the blade abrasive segments is now shown to be advantageous to the dressing of a CMP pad. As is shown in
The conditioner shown in
By angling the cutting face 46 at 90 degrees or less, relative to a finished surface to be applied to the pad 42, the dressing process can cleanly shave a layer of pad material from the pad. The resultant surface applied to the pad can be safely used in the CMP process without damaging expensive silicon wafers. The present pad conditioners can be used to shave even a very shallow, thin layer of material from the pad and leave behind a clean, smooth and even finished surface on the pad. This technique can be used to remove thin layers of glaze that can be formed on the surface of the CMP pad.
The cutting face 46 is shown in
Those embodiments illustrated in the figures that include angled cutting faces each include a cutting face that is formed having the corresponding angle. In some embodiments, however, it is to be understood that a relatively normal (e.g., 90 degree) cutting face can be utilized, except that the abrasive segment on which the cutting face is formed can be “tilted” when attached to the substrate. In other words, the cutting face is not angled relative to the abrasive segment, rather angling of the abrasive segment results in angling of the cutting face. In this manner, an angled cutting face is provided without requiring that the referenced angle be formed on (or in) the abrasive segment.
Additional and varying abrasive segments for use in the present invention are also contemplated. For example, use is contemplated of the various cutting elements/abrasive segments detailed in U.S. patent application Ser. No. 11/357,713, filed Feb. 17, 2006, which is hereby incorporated herein by reference. In addition, formation of the abrasive layer on the segment blanks can be accomplished by way of a variety of techniques, including but not limited to vapor deposition techniques similar to those outlined in U.S. patent application Ser. No. 11/512,755, filed Aug. 29, 2006, which is hereby incorporated herein by reference. In addition, the abrasive segments can be formed utilizing ceramic components (as either or both the segment blank and/or the abrasive layer); electroplating techniques, etc.
In the embodiment illustrated in
Numerous materials and methods of manufacturing are contemplated for constructing the CMP pad conditioners of the present invention. It should be noted that the materials and techniques disclosed herein are exemplary, and additional materials and techniques can be utilized without departing from the present scope.
The various segment blanks shown and discussed herein can be formed from a variety of materials, including, without limitation, metallic materials such as aluminum, copper, steel, metal alloys, etc., ceramic materials, glasses, polymers, composite materials, etc. Generally speaking, virtually any material to which an abrasive segment can be attached thereto will suffice.
In some embodiments, the material of the segment blank can be chosen to provide superior results during the process of attaching the abrasive layer thereto. The abrasive layer can be attached to the segment blank in a variety of manners, including epoxy bonding methods (e.g., organic bonding methods), metal brazing, sintering, electrodeposition, etc. The material of the segment blank can thus be chosen based upon the attachment process anticipated. For example, a segment blank formed partially or fully from nickel, or stainless steel, can be utilized in some processes involving brazing and/or sintering. Also, ceramic or metallic materials might be utilized in organic attachment methods.
Various embodiments of the invention employ various methods of attachment of the abrasive layer to the segment blank. In one aspect, an organic material layer can be deposited on the segment blank, and one or more abrasive particles, chips, segments, etc., can be fixed to the segment blank by way of the organic material layer. Examples of suitable organic materials include, without limitation, amino resins, acrylate resins, alkyd resins, polyester resins, polyamide resins, polyimide resins, polyurethane resins, phenolic resins, phenolic/latex resins, epoxy resins, isocyanate resins, isocyanurate resins, polysiloxane resins, reactive vinyl resins, polyethylene resins, polypropylene resins, polystyrene resins, phenoxy resins, perylene resins, polysulfone resins, acrylonitrile-butadiene-styrene resins, acrylic resins, polycarbonate resins, polyimide resins, and mixtures thereof.
So-called “reverse casting” methods can be used to accurately and controllably orient and attach the abrasive material on the segment blank (and to orient and attach the segment blanks to the pad conditioner substrate). Such methods can include initially securing a superabrasive material, e.g., a plurality of superabrasive particles, to a substrate using a “mask” material. The portions of the particles protruding from the mask material can then be attached to a substrate, such as a segment blank, using the methods discussed herein, after which (or during which), the masking material can be removed.
Suitable reverse casting methods can be found in various patents and patent applications to the present inventor, including U.S. Patent Application Ser. No. 60/992,966, filed Dec. 6, 2007; U.S. patent application Ser. No. 11/804,221, filed May 16, 2007; and U.S. patent application Ser. No. 11/805,549, filed May 22, 2007, each of which is hereby incorporated herein by reference. These techniques can also be used when attaching the abrasive segments of the present invention to pad conditioner substrate in addition to attaching the abrasive layers of the present invention to the segment blanks. Such techniques allow very precise control of lateral placement of the abrasive segments or abrasive layers, as well as very precise control of relative elevation of the abrasive segments or abrasive layers.
When an organic bonding material layer is utilized, methods of curing the organic material layer can be a variety of processes known to one skilled in the art that cause a phase transition in the organic material from at least a pliable state to at least a rigid state. Curing can occur, without limitation, by exposing the organic material to energy in the form of heat, electromagnetic radiation, such as ultraviolet, infrared, and microwave radiation, particle bombardment, such as an electron beam, organic catalysts, inorganic catalysts, or any other curing method known to one skilled in the art.
In one aspect of the present invention, the organic material layer may be a thermoplastic material. Thermoplastic materials can be reversibly hardened and softened by cooling and heating respectively. In another aspect, the organic material layer may be a thermosetting material. Thermosetting materials cannot be reversibly hardened and softened as with the thermoplastic materials. In other words, once curing has occurred, the process can be essentially irreversible, if desired.
As a more detailed list of what is described above, organic materials that may be useful in embodiments of the present invention include, but are not limited to: amino resins including alkylated urea-formaldehyde resins, melamine-formaldehyde resins, and alkylated benzoguanamine-formaldehyde resins; acrylate resins including vinyl acrylates, acrylated epoxies, acrylated urethanes, acrylated polyesters, acrylated acrylics, acrylated polyethers, vinyl ethers, acrylated oils, acrylated silicons, and associated methacrylates; alkyd resins such as urethane alkyd resins; polyester resins; polyamide resins; polyimide resins; reactive urethane resins; polyurethane resins; phenolic resins such as resole and novolac resins; phenolic/latex resins; epoxy resins such as bisphenol epoxy resins; isocyanate resins; isocyanurate resins; polysiloxane resins including alkylalkoxysilane resins; reactive vinyl resins; resins marketed under the Bakelite™ trade name, including polyethylene resins, polypropylene resins, epoxy resins, phenolic resins, polystyrene resins, phenoxy resins, perylene resins, polysulfone resins, ethylene copolymer resins, acrylonitrile-butadiene-styrene (ABS) resins, acrylic resins, and vinyl resins; acrylic resins; polycarbonate resins; and mixtures and combinations thereof. In one aspect of the present invention, the organic material may be an epoxy resin. In another aspect, the organic material may be a polyimide resin. In yet another aspect, the organic material may be a polyurethane resin. In yet another aspect, the organic material may be a polyurethane resin.
Numerous additives may be included in the organic material to facilitate its use. For example, additional crosslinking agents and fillers may be used to improve the cured characteristics of the organic material layer. Additionally, solvents may be utilized to alter the characteristics of the organic material in the uncured state. Also, a reinforcing material may be disposed within at least a portion of the solidified organic material layer. Such reinforcing material may function to increase the strength of the organic material layer, and thus further improve the retention of the individual abrasive segments. In one aspect, the reinforcing material may include ceramics, metals, or combinations thereof. Examples of ceramics include alumina, aluminum carbide, silica, silicon carbide, zirconia, zirconium carbide, and mixtures thereof.
Additionally, in one aspect a coupling agent or an organometallic compound may be coated onto the surface of each superabrasive material to facilitate the retention of the superabrasive material in the organic material via chemical bonding. A wide variety of organic and organometallic compounds is known to those of ordinary skill in the art and may be used. Organometallic coupling agents can form chemicals bonds between the superabrasive materials and the organic material matrix, thus increasing the retention of the superabrasive materials therein. In this way, the organometallic coupling agent can serve as a bridge to form bonds between the organic material matrix and the surface of the superabrasive material. In one aspect of the present invention, the organometallic coupling agent can be a titanate, zirconate, silane, or mixture thereof. The amount of organometallic coupling agent used can depend upon the coupling agent and on the surface area of the superabrasive material. Oftentimes, 0.05% to 10% by weight of the organic material layer can be sufficient.
Specific non-limiting examples of silanes suitable for use in the present invention include: 3-glycidoxypropyltrimethoxy silane (available from Dow Corning as Z-6040); γ-methacryloxy propyltrimethoxy silane (available from Union Carbide Chemicals Company as A-174); β-(3,4-epoxycyclohexyl)ethyltrimethoxy silane, γ-aminopropyltriethoxy silane, N-(β-aminoethyl)-γ-aminopropylmethyldimethoxy silane (available from Union Carbide, Shin-etsu Kagaku Kogyo K.K., etc.).
Specific non-limiting examples of titanate coupling agents include: isopropyltriisostearoyl titanate, di(cumylphenylate)oxyacetate titanate, 4-aminobenzenesulfonyldodecylbenzenesulfonyl titanate, tetraoctylbis(ditridecylphosphite)titanate, isopropyltri(N-ethylamino-ethylamino) titanate (available from Kenrich Petrochemicals. Inc.), neoalkyoxy titanates such as LICA-01, LICA-09, LICA-28, LICA-44 and LICA-97 (also available from Kenrich), and the like.
Specific non-limiting examples of aluminum coupling agents include acetoalkoxy aluminum diisopropylate (available from Ajinomoto K.K.), and the like.
Specific non-limiting examples of zirconate coupling agents include: neoalkoxy zirconates, LZ-01, LZ-09, LZ-12, LZ-38, LZ-44, LZ-97 (all available from Kenrich Petrochemicals, Inc.), and the like. Other known organometallic coupling agents, e.g., thiolate based compounds, can be used in the present invention and are considered within the scope of the present invention.
Metal brazing can also be utilized to attach the abrasive layer to the segment blank. Metal brazing techniques are known in the art. For example, in fabricating a diamond particle abrasive segment, the process can include mixing diamond particles (e.g., 40/50 U.S. mesh grit) with a suitable metal support matrix (bond) powder (e.g., cobalt powder of 1.5 micrometer in size). The mixture is then compressed in a mold to form a desired shape. This “green” form of the tool can then be consolidated by sintering at a temperature between 700-1200 degrees C. to form a single body with a plurality of abrasive particles disposed therein. Finally, the consolidated body can be attached (e.g., by brazing) to a segment blank. Many other exemplary uses of this technology are known to those having ordinary skill in the art.
It should also be noted that various sintering methods can also be utilized to attach the abrasive layer to the segment blank. Suitable sintering methods will be easily appreciated by one of ordinary skill in the art having possession of this disclosure.
The abrasive layer can also be attached to the segment blank by way of known electroplating and/or electrodeposition processes. As an example of a suitable method for positioning and retaining abrasive materials prior to and during the electrodeposition process, a mold can be used that includes an insulating material that can effectively prevent the accumulation of electrodeposited material on the molding surface. Abrasive particles can be held on the molding surface of the mold during electrodeposition. As such, the accumulation of electrodeposited material can be prevented from occurring on the particle tips and the working surface of the pad conditioner substrate. Such techniques are described in U.S. patent application Ser. No. 11/292,938, filed Dec. 2, 2005, which is hereby incorporated herein by reference.
One or more apertures can extend through the insulating material to allow for circulation of an electrolytic fluid from an area outside the mold through the mold and to the surface of the pad conditioner substrate in order to facilitate electrodeposition. Such circulation can be advantageous as it is generally necessary to keep a sufficient concentration of ions in an electrolytic fluid at the location of electrodeposition. Other well known techniques can also be utilized, it being understood that the above-provided example is only one of many suitable techniques.
The segment blank can similarly be attached to the pad conditioner substrate in a variety of manners. Depending upon the material from which the segment blank is formed, various manners of fixing the segment blank to the pad conditioner substrate may be utilizing. Suitable attachment methods include, without limitation, organic binding, brazing, welding, etc.
The geometric configuration of a given abrasive segment can vary. For example, in one aspect the abrasive segment can include a generally rectangular or trapezoidal segment blank with a layer of abrasive material attached to an upper portion thereof. The size of the segment blank can vary. In one aspect of the invention, segment blank size can be adjusted to achieve uniform distribution of diamond particles and/or cutting blades about an annular ring array. In the case of particle abrasive segments, each segment can contain a plurality of diamond particles with pitch set from 3× to 10× of the diamond size. Smaller segments can be better distributed to share the loading during dressings.
The modular nature of the present systems allows a great deal of flexibility in attaching the abrasive layer to the segment blanks. As the segment blanks can be prepared separately from the pad conditioner substrate, a variety of manufacturing advantages can be realized when applying the abrasive layer to the segment blank, without regard to the size, shape, mass, material, etc., of the pad conditioner substrate to which the segment blanks will eventually be attached.
In one aspect, the abrasive segments arranged about the face of the conditioner substrate can each be substantially the same in size, shape, abrasive composition, height relative to one another, etc. In other embodiments, the size, shape, abrasive composition, height relative to one another, etc., can be purposefully varied, to achieve optimal design flexibility for any particular application. Also, each of the afore-mentioned qualities can be varied from one segment to another: e.g., alternating segments can include PCD abrasive pieces, chips or slats, with adjacent segments including abrasive particles.
The retention of abrasive segments on the pad conditioner substrate can be improved by arranging the abrasive segments such that mechanical stress impinging on any individual abrasive segment is minimized. By reducing the stress impinging on each abrasive segment they can be more readily retained in place on the substrate, particularly for delicate tasks. Minimizing of stress variations between segments can be accomplished by spacing the segments evenly (or consistently) from one another, leveling to a uniform height (relative to the face of the pad conditioner substrate) an uppermost portion of each segment, radially aligning the segments about the face of the pad conditioner substrate, etc. Various other height and spacing techniques can be utilized to obtain a desired affect.
In one embodiment of the invention, the spacing of the abrasive segments can be adjusted to alter the contact pressure of the contact portion (e.g., the portion of the segment that engages and removes material from the CMP pad) of each segment. In general, the farther the segments are spaced from one another, the higher the contact pressure between the segment and the CMP pad. Thus, a higher density of abrasive segments across the face of the pad conditioner substrate can, in some cases, provide a more desirable abrasive interface between the pad conditioner substrate and the CMP pad. In other applications, a lower density of abrasive segments may be beneficial. In either case, the present invention provides a great deal of design flexibility to obtain the optimal abrading profile.
By forming the abrasive segments in individual units having defined geometric shapes, arrangement of the abrasive segments in a very precise manner becomes much easier. As the defined geometric shapes can be replicated fairly precisely from one abrasive segment to another, the positioning of, and accordingly, the stress impinged upon, each abrasive segment can be accomplished fairly consistently across the face of the pad conditioner substrate in question. With prior art abrasive grits, for example, the overall shape and size of each a plurality of grits might change considerably from one grit to another, making precise placement of the grits difficult to accomplish. This problem is adequately addressed by the advantageous features of the present invention.
It has been found that diamond pad conditioners used commercially normally contain about ten thousand diamond particles. Due to the distortion of the substrate, particularly when the disk is manufactured by a high temperature process (e.g. by brazing), and also the distribution of particle sizes and diamond orientations, the cutting tips are located at different heights. When they are pressed against a polishing pad, only about 1% of the protruded diamond can be in engagement with a pad. This can increase the stress on the diamond cutting most deeply into the pad, and the diamond may break and cause catastrophic scratching of the expensive wafers.
By utilizing the reverse casting methods as described above, the height difference of between particles can be greatly reduced. In one aspect of the invention, abrasive segments are set on a flat metal (e.g. stainless steel) mold with designed spacing in a retainer ring. Epoxy with hardener fully mixed can be poured into the retainer ring to fill up and cover all segments. The diamond grits on the mold can be shielded by the penetration of the epoxy flow. After curing (with or without heating), the retainer ring and the mold can be removed. The diamond segments are thereby firmly embedded in the epoxy matrix. Due to the leveling of diamond by the flat mold, the tip height variations of the tallest diamond grits are minimized.
The following examples present various methods for making the pad conditioners of the present invention. Such examples are illustrative only, and no limitation on the present invention is to be thereby realized.
A pad conditioner was formed by first arranging diamond grit (e.g. 50/60 mesh) on a stainless steel flat mold (also, a slightly convex or contoured mold can be utilized) having a layer of adhesive (e.g. acrylic). A hard rubber material was used to press individual diamond grits into the adhesive while tips of the grits were leveled by the flat mold. A mixture of epoxy and hardener was then poured onto the grit protruding outside the adhesive (a containment ring oriented outside the mold can retain the epoxy). After curing, the mold was then removed and the adhesive was peeled away. The remaining ODD contains diamond grit protruding outside a solidified epoxy substrate. The back of the epoxy can be machined and the disk adhered to a stainless steel (e.g. 316) plate with fastening holes for mounting on a CMP machine.
A pad conditioner was formed by radially arranging serrated PCD blades. As in the previous example, the teeth of the PCD blade were leveled with a mold that can be positioned either on the bottom or on the top of the pad conditioner. Epoxy was then cast as in the previous example. In the case that the mold is on the top, the blades are pressed slightly into the slot of a substrate and the slot is sealed by epoxy or silicone.
A composite design married the embodiments of Example 1 and Example 2 discussed above. This design leverages the many cutting tips of Example 1 with the cutting efficiency of Example 2. In this Example 3, smaller organic abrasive segments were formed by using a fiber reinforced polymer that is generally harder than epoxy. The organic segments were then radially arranged about a pad conditioner substrate with the blades of Example 2 interspersed therebetween. The cutting tips of the blades were leveled so as to be about 20 microns higher than were the tips of the organic abrasive segments. In this manner, the penetration depth of blade cutting teeth is controlled, while the organic cutting teeth play a secondary role in dressing the pad with the effect of removing glaze and also grooving the pad.
It is to be understood that the above-described arrangements are only illustrative of the application of the principles of the present invention. Numerous modifications and alternative arrangements may be devised by those skilled in the art without departing from the spirit and scope of the present invention and any appended or following claims are intended to cover such modifications and arrangements. Thus, while the present invention has been described above with particularity and detail in connection with what is presently deemed to be the most practical and preferred embodiments of the invention, it will be apparent to those of ordinary skill in the art that numerous modifications, including, but not limited to, variations in size, materials, shape, form, function and manner of operation, assembly and use may be made without departing from the principles and concepts set forth herein.
This application is a continuation in part of copending U.S. patent application Ser. No. 12/168,110, filed on Jul. 5, 2008, which claims the benefit of U.S. Provisional Patent Application Ser. No. 60/976,198, filed Sep. 28, 2007; this application is also a continuation-in-part of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 11/560,817, filed Nov. 16, 2006 now U.S. Pat. No. 7,762,872, each of which are hereby incorporated herein by reference.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
187593 | Brown et al. | Feb 1877 | A |
1854071 | Schacht | Apr 1932 | A |
1988065 | Wooddell | Jan 1935 | A |
2027087 | Buckner | Jan 1936 | A |
2027307 | Schacht | Jan 1936 | A |
2033991 | Melton | Mar 1936 | A |
2035521 | Benner | Mar 1936 | A |
RE20660 | Schacht | Feb 1938 | E |
2184348 | Kirchner | Dec 1939 | A |
2187624 | Melton | Jan 1940 | A |
2194253 | Benner | Mar 1940 | A |
2268663 | Kuzmick | Jan 1942 | A |
2281558 | Cross | May 1942 | A |
2318570 | Carlton | May 1943 | A |
2334572 | Melton | Nov 1943 | A |
2612348 | Catallo | Sep 1952 | A |
2725693 | Smith | Dec 1955 | A |
2811960 | Fessel | Nov 1957 | A |
2867086 | Haley | Jan 1959 | A |
2876086 | Raymond | Mar 1959 | A |
2947608 | Hall | Aug 1960 | A |
2652951 | Simpson | Sep 1960 | A |
2952951 | Simpson | Sep 1960 | A |
3067551 | Maginnis | Dec 1962 | A |
3121981 | Hurst | Feb 1964 | A |
3127715 | Christensen | Apr 1964 | A |
3146560 | Hurst | Sep 1964 | A |
3276852 | Lemelson | Oct 1966 | A |
3293012 | Smiley | Dec 1966 | A |
3372010 | Parsons | Mar 1968 | A |
3377411 | Charvat | Apr 1968 | A |
3416560 | Bruno | Dec 1968 | A |
3440774 | Cum | Apr 1969 | A |
3608134 | Cook | Sep 1971 | A |
3625666 | James | Dec 1971 | A |
3631638 | Yoshikawa et al. | Jan 1972 | A |
2078354 | Webster | Apr 1973 | A |
3743489 | Wentorf et al. | Jul 1973 | A |
3767371 | Wentorf, Jr. et al. | Oct 1973 | A |
3802130 | Lindenbeck | Apr 1974 | A |
3819814 | Pope | Jun 1974 | A |
3852078 | Wakatsuki et al. | Dec 1974 | A |
3894673 | Lowder et al. | Jul 1975 | A |
3982358 | Fukuda | Sep 1976 | A |
4018576 | Lowder et al. | Apr 1977 | A |
4078906 | Green | Mar 1978 | A |
4149881 | D'Silva | Apr 1979 | A |
4155721 | Fletcher | May 1979 | A |
4182628 | D'Silva | Jan 1980 | A |
4188194 | Corrigan | Feb 1980 | A |
4201601 | D'Silva | May 1980 | A |
4211294 | Multakh | Jul 1980 | A |
4211924 | Muller et al. | Jul 1980 | A |
4224380 | Bovenkerk et al. | Sep 1980 | A |
4228214 | Steigelman et al. | Oct 1980 | A |
4229186 | Wilson | Oct 1980 | A |
4273561 | Villalobos | Jun 1981 | A |
4287168 | Wentorf et al. | Sep 1981 | A |
4289503 | Corrigan | Sep 1981 | A |
4341532 | Oide | Jul 1982 | A |
4355489 | Heyer et al. | Oct 1982 | A |
4481016 | Campbell et al. | Nov 1984 | A |
4525179 | Gigl | Jun 1985 | A |
4547257 | Iizuka et al. | Oct 1985 | A |
4551195 | Iizuka et al. | Nov 1985 | A |
4565034 | Sekiya | Jan 1986 | A |
4610699 | Yazu et al. | Sep 1986 | A |
4617181 | Yazu et al. | Oct 1986 | A |
4629373 | Hall | Dec 1986 | A |
4632817 | Yazu et al. | Dec 1986 | A |
4662896 | Dennis | May 1987 | A |
4669522 | Griffin | Jun 1987 | A |
4680199 | Vontell et al. | Jul 1987 | A |
4712552 | Pangburn | Dec 1987 | A |
4749514 | Murakami et al. | Jun 1988 | A |
4776861 | Frushour | Oct 1988 | A |
4780274 | Barr | Oct 1988 | A |
4797241 | Peterson et al. | Jan 1989 | A |
4828582 | Frushour | May 1989 | A |
4849602 | Gardner | Jul 1989 | A |
4866888 | Murai et al. | Sep 1989 | A |
4883500 | Deakins et al. | Nov 1989 | A |
4908046 | Wiand | Mar 1990 | A |
4916869 | Oliver | Apr 1990 | A |
4923490 | Johnson et al. | May 1990 | A |
4925457 | deKok et al. | May 1990 | A |
4927619 | Tsuji | May 1990 | A |
4943488 | Sung et al. | Jul 1990 | A |
4945686 | Wiand | Aug 1990 | A |
4949511 | Endo et al. | Aug 1990 | A |
4954139 | Cerutti | Sep 1990 | A |
4968326 | Wiand | Nov 1990 | A |
5000273 | Horton et al. | Mar 1991 | A |
5011513 | Zador et al. | Apr 1991 | A |
5022895 | Wiand | Jun 1991 | A |
5024680 | Chen et al. | Jun 1991 | A |
5030276 | Sung et al. | Jul 1991 | A |
5037451 | Burnand et al. | Aug 1991 | A |
5043120 | Corrigan | Aug 1991 | A |
5049165 | Tselesin | Sep 1991 | A |
5092082 | Padberg | Mar 1992 | A |
5092910 | deKok et al. | Mar 1992 | A |
5116568 | Sung | May 1992 | A |
5131924 | Wiand | Jul 1992 | A |
5133782 | Wiand | Jul 1992 | A |
5137543 | Heath et al. | Aug 1992 | A |
5151107 | Cho et al. | Sep 1992 | A |
5164247 | Solanki et al. | Nov 1992 | A |
5176155 | Rudolph, Jr. | Jan 1993 | A |
5190568 | Tselesin | Mar 1993 | A |
5194070 | Sumiya et al. | Mar 1993 | A |
5194071 | Corrigan | Mar 1993 | A |
5195403 | Sani et al. | Mar 1993 | A |
5195404 | Notter et al. | Mar 1993 | A |
5197249 | Wiand | Mar 1993 | A |
5203881 | Wiand | Apr 1993 | A |
5232320 | Tank et al. | Aug 1993 | A |
5243790 | Gagne | Sep 1993 | A |
5247765 | Quintana | Sep 1993 | A |
5248317 | Tank | Sep 1993 | A |
5264011 | Brown et al. | Nov 1993 | A |
5266236 | Bovenkerk | Nov 1993 | A |
5271547 | Carlson | Dec 1993 | A |
5273730 | Yoshida et al. | Dec 1993 | A |
5295402 | Bovenkerk | Mar 1994 | A |
5314513 | Miller et al. | May 1994 | A |
5328548 | Tsuji et al. | Jul 1994 | A |
5364423 | Bigelow et al. | Nov 1994 | A |
5374293 | Takashita et al. | Dec 1994 | A |
5380390 | Tselesin | Jan 1995 | A |
5443032 | Vichr et al. | Aug 1995 | A |
5453106 | Roberts | Sep 1995 | A |
5454343 | Eun et al. | Oct 1995 | A |
5458754 | Sathrum et al. | Oct 1995 | A |
5486131 | Cesna et al. | Jan 1996 | A |
5492771 | Lowder et al. | Feb 1996 | A |
5496386 | Broberg et al. | Mar 1996 | A |
5500248 | Iacovangelo et al. | Mar 1996 | A |
5505272 | Clark | Apr 1996 | A |
5518443 | Fisher | May 1996 | A |
5527424 | Mullins | Jun 1996 | A |
5536202 | Appel et al. | Jul 1996 | A |
5547417 | Breivogel et al. | Aug 1996 | A |
5551959 | Martin et al. | Sep 1996 | A |
5560745 | Roberts | Oct 1996 | A |
5560754 | Johnson et al. | Oct 1996 | A |
5609286 | Anthon | Mar 1997 | A |
5620489 | Tselesin | Apr 1997 | A |
5660894 | Chen et al. | Aug 1997 | A |
5669943 | Horton et al. | Sep 1997 | A |
5674572 | Sarin et al. | Oct 1997 | A |
5725421 | Goers et al. | Mar 1998 | A |
5746931 | Graebner et al. | May 1998 | A |
RE35812 | Oliver | Jun 1998 | E |
5772756 | Davies et al. | Jun 1998 | A |
5776214 | Wood | Jul 1998 | A |
5779743 | Wood | Jul 1998 | A |
5791975 | Cesna et al. | Aug 1998 | A |
5801073 | Robbins et al. | Sep 1998 | A |
5816891 | Woo | Oct 1998 | A |
5820450 | Calhoun | Oct 1998 | A |
5833519 | Moore | Nov 1998 | A |
5851138 | Hempel, Jr. | Dec 1998 | A |
5855314 | Shiue et al. | Jan 1999 | A |
5885137 | Ploessl | Mar 1999 | A |
5902173 | Tanaka | May 1999 | A |
5916011 | Kim et al. | Jun 1999 | A |
5919084 | Powell et al. | Jul 1999 | A |
5921856 | Zimmer | Jul 1999 | A |
5924917 | Benedict et al. | Jul 1999 | A |
5961373 | Lai et al. | Oct 1999 | A |
5975988 | Christianson | Nov 1999 | A |
5976001 | Powell et al. | Nov 1999 | A |
5976205 | Andrews et al. | Nov 1999 | A |
5980852 | Burns et al. | Nov 1999 | A |
5980982 | Degawa et al. | Nov 1999 | A |
5985228 | Corrigan et al. | Nov 1999 | A |
6001008 | Fujimori et al. | Dec 1999 | A |
6001174 | Fang | Dec 1999 | A |
6024824 | Krech | Feb 2000 | A |
6027659 | Billett | Feb 2000 | A |
6030595 | Sumiya et al. | Feb 2000 | A |
6039641 | Sung | Mar 2000 | A |
6054183 | Zimmer et al. | Apr 2000 | A |
6093280 | Kirchner et al. | Jul 2000 | A |
6106382 | Sakaguchi | Aug 2000 | A |
6123612 | Goers | Sep 2000 | A |
6159286 | Sung | Dec 2000 | A |
6179886 | Gordeev et al. | Jan 2001 | B1 |
6190240 | Kinoshita et al. | Feb 2001 | B1 |
6196911 | Preston et al. | Mar 2001 | B1 |
6206942 | Wood | Mar 2001 | B1 |
6213856 | Cho et al. | Apr 2001 | B1 |
6217413 | Christianson | Apr 2001 | B1 |
6224469 | Ohmori et al. | May 2001 | B1 |
6258138 | DeVoe et al. | Jul 2001 | B1 |
6258201 | Krech | Jul 2001 | B1 |
6258237 | Gal-Or et al. | Jul 2001 | B1 |
6277304 | Wei et al. | Aug 2001 | B1 |
6281129 | Easter et al. | Aug 2001 | B1 |
6284556 | Wang et al. | Sep 2001 | B1 |
6286498 | Sung | Sep 2001 | B1 |
6293854 | Kimura et al. | Sep 2001 | B1 |
6299508 | Gagliardi et al. | Oct 2001 | B1 |
6319108 | Adefris et al. | Nov 2001 | B1 |
6325709 | Nanda et al. | Dec 2001 | B1 |
6346202 | Molnar | Feb 2002 | B1 |
6354918 | Togawa et al. | Mar 2002 | B1 |
6354929 | Adefris et al. | Mar 2002 | B1 |
6368198 | Sung et al. | Apr 2002 | B1 |
6371838 | Holzapfel | Apr 2002 | B1 |
6371842 | Romero | Apr 2002 | B1 |
6394886 | Chen et al. | May 2002 | B1 |
6409580 | Lougher et al. | Jun 2002 | B1 |
6439986 | Myoung et al. | Aug 2002 | B1 |
6446740 | Eyre | Sep 2002 | B2 |
6458018 | Goers et al. | Oct 2002 | B1 |
6478831 | Tselesin | Nov 2002 | B2 |
6497853 | Davies et al. | Dec 2002 | B1 |
6544599 | Brown et al. | Apr 2003 | B1 |
6551176 | Garretson | Apr 2003 | B1 |
6607423 | Arcayan et al. | Aug 2003 | B1 |
6616725 | Cho et al. | Sep 2003 | B2 |
6626167 | Kim et al. | Sep 2003 | B2 |
6627168 | Ohtsubo et al. | Sep 2003 | B1 |
6629884 | Goers | Oct 2003 | B1 |
6672943 | Vogtmann et al. | Jan 2004 | B2 |
6679243 | Sung | Jan 2004 | B2 |
6694847 | Hiroyasu et al. | Feb 2004 | B2 |
6722952 | Goers et al. | Apr 2004 | B2 |
6749485 | James et al. | Jun 2004 | B1 |
6755720 | Ishizaki et al. | Jun 2004 | B1 |
6790126 | Wood et al. | Sep 2004 | B2 |
6818029 | Myoung et al. | Nov 2004 | B2 |
6824455 | Osterheld et al. | Nov 2004 | B2 |
6835365 | Davies et al. | Dec 2004 | B1 |
6884155 | Sung et al. | Apr 2005 | B2 |
6899592 | Kojima et al. | May 2005 | B1 |
6905571 | Sakuma et al. | Jun 2005 | B2 |
6945857 | Doan et al. | Sep 2005 | B1 |
6979357 | Fries et al. | Dec 2005 | B2 |
7021995 | Toge et al. | Apr 2006 | B2 |
7033408 | Fries et al. | Apr 2006 | B2 |
7044990 | Ishizaki et al. | May 2006 | B2 |
7066795 | Balagani et al. | Jun 2006 | B2 |
7124753 | Sung | Oct 2006 | B2 |
7150677 | Yamashita et al. | Dec 2006 | B2 |
7198553 | Goers | Apr 2007 | B2 |
7201645 | Sung | Apr 2007 | B2 |
7247577 | Palmgren et al. | Jul 2007 | B2 |
7258708 | Sung | Aug 2007 | B2 |
7261621 | Moon et al. | Aug 2007 | B2 |
7323049 | Sung | Jan 2008 | B2 |
7368013 | Sung | May 2008 | B2 |
7384436 | Sung | Jun 2008 | B2 |
7404857 | Sung | Jul 2008 | B2 |
7465217 | Kinoshita et al. | Dec 2008 | B2 |
7585366 | Sung | Sep 2009 | B2 |
7641538 | Goers | Jan 2010 | B2 |
7651386 | Sung | Jan 2010 | B2 |
7658666 | Sung | Feb 2010 | B2 |
7690971 | Sung | Apr 2010 | B2 |
7840305 | Behr et al. | Nov 2010 | B2 |
8104464 | Sung | Jan 2012 | B2 |
20010003884 | Wei et al. | Jun 2001 | A1 |
20010009844 | Cho et al. | Jul 2001 | A1 |
20020042200 | Fawcett | Apr 2002 | A1 |
20020127962 | Cho et al. | Sep 2002 | A1 |
20020164928 | Tolles | Nov 2002 | A1 |
20020173234 | Sung et al. | Nov 2002 | A1 |
20030054746 | Nussbaumer et al. | Mar 2003 | A1 |
20030084894 | Sung | May 2003 | A1 |
20030114094 | Myoung et al. | Jun 2003 | A1 |
20030207659 | Annen et al. | Nov 2003 | A1 |
20040009742 | Lin et al. | Jan 2004 | A1 |
20040060243 | Fries et al. | Apr 2004 | A1 |
20040079033 | Long | Apr 2004 | A1 |
20040091627 | Ohara et al. | May 2004 | A1 |
20040107648 | Sung | Jun 2004 | A1 |
20040180617 | Goers | Sep 2004 | A1 |
20040203325 | Donohue | Oct 2004 | A1 |
20050032462 | Gagliardi et al. | Feb 2005 | A1 |
20050060941 | Provow et al. | Mar 2005 | A1 |
20050118939 | Duescher | Jun 2005 | A1 |
20050215188 | Toge et al. | Sep 2005 | A1 |
20050260939 | Andrews et al. | Nov 2005 | A1 |
20060073774 | Sung | Apr 2006 | A1 |
20060079160 | Balagani et al. | Apr 2006 | A1 |
20060079162 | Yamashita et al. | Apr 2006 | A1 |
20060128288 | An et al. | Jun 2006 | A1 |
20060135050 | Petersen et al. | Jun 2006 | A1 |
20060143991 | Sung | Jul 2006 | A1 |
20060254154 | Huang et al. | Nov 2006 | A1 |
20060258276 | Sung | Nov 2006 | A1 |
20070051354 | Sung | Mar 2007 | A1 |
20070051355 | Sung | Mar 2007 | A1 |
20070060026 | Sung | Mar 2007 | A1 |
20070066194 | Wielonski et al. | Mar 2007 | A1 |
20070093181 | Lugg et al. | Apr 2007 | A1 |
20070128994 | Sung | Jun 2007 | A1 |
20070155298 | Sung | Jul 2007 | A1 |
20070249270 | Sung | Oct 2007 | A1 |
20070254566 | Sung | Nov 2007 | A1 |
20070264918 | Sung | Nov 2007 | A1 |
20070266639 | Sung | Nov 2007 | A1 |
20070295267 | Sung | Dec 2007 | A1 |
20080076338 | Andrews et al. | Mar 2008 | A1 |
20080096479 | Sung | Apr 2008 | A1 |
20080153398 | Sung | Jun 2008 | A1 |
20080171503 | Sung | Jul 2008 | A1 |
20080271384 | Puthanangady et al. | Nov 2008 | A1 |
20080292869 | Sung | Nov 2008 | A1 |
20090068937 | Sung | Mar 2009 | A1 |
20090093195 | Sung | Apr 2009 | A1 |
20090145045 | Sung | Jun 2009 | A1 |
20090283089 | Sung | Nov 2009 | A1 |
20100015898 | An et al. | Jan 2010 | A1 |
20100139174 | Sung | Jun 2010 | A1 |
20100186479 | Borucki et al. | Jul 2010 | A1 |
20100203811 | Philipossian et al. | Aug 2010 | A1 |
20100221990 | Sung | Sep 2010 | A1 |
20100248595 | Dinh-Ngoc | Sep 2010 | A1 |
20100248596 | Sung | Sep 2010 | A1 |
20100261419 | Sung | Oct 2010 | A1 |
20110212670 | Sung | Sep 2011 | A1 |
20110275288 | Sung | Nov 2011 | A1 |
20110296766 | Sung | Dec 2011 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
1351922 | Jun 2002 | CN |
1494984 | May 2004 | CN |
0712941 | May 1966 | EP |
0238434 | Mar 1987 | EP |
0280657 | Aug 1988 | EP |
0331344 | Feb 1989 | EP |
0264674 | Sep 1995 | EP |
1075898 | Feb 2001 | EP |
2239011 | Jun 1991 | GB |
06182184 | Apr 1994 | JP |
10128654 | May 1998 | JP |
10180618 | Jul 1998 | JP |
11048122 | Feb 1999 | JP |
11077536 | Mar 1999 | JP |
200167774 | Jun 2000 | JP |
2000343436 | Dec 2000 | JP |
2003-071718 | Mar 2003 | JP |
2004025401 | Jan 2004 | JP |
2007-044823 | Feb 2007 | JP |
20-0339181 | Jan 2004 | KR |
WO 9427883 | Dec 1994 | WO |
WO 9527596 | Oct 1995 | WO |
WO 9606732 | Mar 1996 | WO |
WO 9810897 | Mar 1998 | WO |
WO 9845091 | Mar 1998 | WO |
WO 9851448 | Mar 1998 | WO |
WO 9845092 | Oct 1998 | WO |
WO 0231078 | Apr 2002 | WO |
WO2004094106 | Nov 2004 | WO |
WO 2006124792 | Nov 2006 | WO |
WO 2007032946 | Mar 2007 | WO |
WO 2008063599 | May 2008 | WO |
Entry |
---|
U.S. Appl. No. 12/715,583, filed Mar. 2, 2010; Chien-Min Sung; office action issued Oct. 25, 2011. |
Sung, U.S. Appl. No. 11/804,221, filed May 16, 2007. Office Action issued on Jan. 16, 2009. |
U.S. Appl. No. 12/328,338, filed Dec. 4, 2008; Chien-Min Sung; office action issued May 10, 2011. |
U.S. Appl. No. 13/021,350, filed Feb. 4, 2011; Chien-Min Sung; office action issued Aug. 31, 2011. |
U.S. Appl. No. 11/512,755, filed Aug. 29, 2006, Chien-Min Sung. Office action issued Oct. 13, 2009. |
Syndite, CTM302. Announcement, elementsix Advancing Diamond. Jan. 14, 2003. http://www.e6.com/en/resourcestannouncementsheets/CTM302.pdf. As accessed on Dec. 16, 2008. |
PCT Application PCT/US2007/024165; filed Nov. 16, 2007; Chien-Min Sung; International Search Report mailed May 23, 2011. |
U.S. Appl. No. 12/255,823, filed Oct. 22, 2005; Chien-Min Sung; office action issued Mar. 7, 2012. |
U.S. Appl. No. 12/168,110, filed Jul. 5, 2008; Chien-Min Sung; office action issued May 14, 2012. |
U.S. Appl. No. 12/715,583, filed Mar. 2, 2010; Chien-Min Sung; office action issued Mar. 21, 2012. |
U.S. Appl. No. 13/021,350, filed Feb. 4, 2011; Chien-Min Sung; office action issued Feb. 7, 2012. |
U.S. Appl. No. 12/267,172, filed Nov. 7, 2008; Chien-Min Sung; office action issued Jan. 3, 2012. |
Colmonoy Technical Data Sheet; No. DSP-A; 1993. |
Endecott's Specifications; 2004. |
Kennametal Specification for DMHPM002 Hot Press Matrix N-50 Dec. 6, 2001. |
Material Safety Data Sheet (MSDS), Wall Colmonoy Corporation; prepared Jul. 20, 1989. |
Material Safety Data Sheet MSDS); Kennametal; issued Jun. 11, 2004. |
Sung et al.; The Eastern Wind of Diamond Synthesis; New Diamond and Frontier Carpon Technology; 2003; pp. 47-61; vol. 13, No. 1. |
Sung et al; Mechanism of the Solvent-Assisted Graphite to Diamond Transition Under High Pressure: Implications for the Selection of Catalysts, High Temperatures-High Pressure; 1995/1996; pp. 523-546; vol. 27/28. |
Syndite, Elementsix Advancing Diamond; 2 pages. |
U.S. Appl. No. 08/832,852, filed Apr. 4, 1997; Chien-Min Sung. |
U.S. Appl. No. 09/447,620, filed Nov. 22, 1999; Chien-Min Sung. |
Yasinaga et al; Advances in Abrasive Technology, III; Soc. Of Grinding Engineers (SGE) in Japan; 2000. |
U.S. Appl. No. 11/512/755, filed Aug. 29, 2006; Chien-Min Sung. |
U.S. Appl. No. 13/021,350, filed Feb. 4, 2011; Chien-Min Sung; office action issued Aug. 10, 2012. |
U.S. Appl. No. 12/715,583, filed Mar. 2, 2010; Chien-Min Sung; office action issued Aug. 9, 2012. |
U.S. Appl. No. 12/267,172, filed Nov. 7, 2008; Chien-Min Sung; office action issued Jul. 9, 2012. |
U.S. Appl. No. 13/362,917, filed Jan. 31, 2012; Chien-Min Sung; office action issued Jun. 14, 2012. |
U.S. Appl. No. 12/255,823, filed Oct. 22, 2008; Chien-Min Sung; notice of allowance issued Sep. 21, 2012. |
U.S. Appl. No. 12/267,172, filed Nov. 7, 2008; Chien-Min Sung; notice of allowance dated Oct. 22, 2012. |
U.S. Appl. No. 12/328,338, filed Dec. 4, 2008, Chien-Min Sung, Office Action issued Jan. 3, 2011. |
U.S. Appl. No. 11/805,549, filed May 22, 2007, Chien-Min Sung, Office Action issued Oct. 6, 2010. |
U.S. Appl. No. 12/715,583, filed Mar. 2, 2010; Chien-Min Sung; notice of allowance dated Dec. 7, 2012. |
PCT/US2012/039199; filed May 23, 2012; Chien-Min Sung; International Search Report dated Dec. 18, 2012. |
U.S. Appl. No. 13/362,917, filed Jan. 13, 2012; Chien-Min Sung; office action dated Dec. 31, 2012. |
U.S. Appl. No. 12/267,172, filed Nov. 7, 2008; Chien-Min Sung; notice of allowance dated Jan. 7, 2013. |
U.S. Appl. No. 12/168,110, filed Jul. 5, 2008; Chien-Min Sung; notice of allowance dated Jan. 18, 2013. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20090093195 A1 | Apr 2009 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
60976198 | Sep 2007 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 12168110 | Jul 2008 | US |
Child | 12255823 | US | |
Parent | 11560817 | Nov 2006 | US |
Child | 12168110 | US |