(1) Field of the Invention
This invention relates to the casting of metals, particularly aluminum and aluminum alloys, by direct chill casting techniques. More particularly, the invention relates to the co-casting of metal layers by direct chill casting.
(2) Description of the Related Art
Metal ingots are commonly produced by direct chill (DC) casting of molten metals in which a molten metal is poured into a mold having an open upper end and (after start-up) an open lower end. The metal emerges from the lower end of the mold as a metal ingot that descends as the casting operation proceeds. In other cases, the casting takes place horizontally, but the procedure is essentially the same. Such casting techniques are particularly suited for the casting of aluminum and aluminum alloys, but are suitable for the casting of other metals as well.
Casting techniques of this kind are discussed extensively in U.S. Pat. No. 6,260,602 to Wagstaff, which relates exclusively to the casting of monolithic ingots, i.e. ingots made of the same material throughout cast as a single layer or ingot. Apparatus and methods for casting layered structures by DC casting are disclosed, for example, in U.S. Pat. No. 6,705,384 to Kilmer et al., issued Mar. 16, 2004, and in U.S. Patent Publication No. 2005/0011630 A1 to Anderson et al., published on Jan. 20, 2005. The Kilmer et al. patent makes use of a metallic divider member suspended in a direct-chill mold. The divider member separates the mold into two chambers that may be supplied with different molten metals, and the member becomes part of the ingot as the molten metal freezes. Consequently, the divider member is continuously fed into the mold through the entry end as the casting operation progresses so that part of the divider member is always present in the mold to keep the molten metal pools separated from each other. In contrast, the Anderson et al. publication employs so-called sequential solidification which requires the casting of a first layer (e.g. a core ingot) and allowing it to cool to the extent that it forms a solid (or at least semi-solid) outer surface, and then, subsequently but in the same casting operation, casting one or more layers of other metal on the solidified surface of the first metal layer. This can be achieved by providing a cooled divider wall at the entrance of the mold to divide the mold entrance into two chambers for receiving feeds of different molten metals. The divider wall remains in place during the casting operation and does not become incorporated into the solidified ingot. The length of the divider wall (in the axial direction of the mold) is long enough to permit the first layer to form its solid shell before it comes into contact with molten metal forming additional layers. The disclosures of the Wagstaff, Kilmer et al. and Anderson et al. references are specifically incorporated herein by this reference.
Ingots produced by both of these co-casting techniques, i.e. the use of a continuously supplied divider member that becomes incorporated into the ingot, and the provision of a cooled divider wall, may suffer from certain disadvantages, especially when intended for subsequent rolling into sheet products, such as brazing strip. One problem is that a relatively thin coating layer formed on a thicker core ingot may be “wiped off” during rolling at the leading and trailing ends of the ingot (i.e. at the ingot head and butt ends), and also at the width sides of the ingot. These phenomena are referred to, respectively, as head-, butt- and edge-wiping, and involve a squeezing of the metal of the coating layer beyond the ends or sides of the ingot at the points where localized rolling pressures may be higher than those over the remainder of the ingot. Another problem is that, because the ingot is subjected to different cooling dynamics during the main stage of the casting operation than at the start and end of casting, so that the cooling ingot is subjected to different rates of contraction in these stages, the interface between the layers may become non-planar in the final cast ingot. This may cause differences of thickness of the coating layer after rolling.
There is therefore a need for improvements to casting apparatus and methods of this kind.
An exemplary embodiment of the invention provides an apparatus for casting a composite metal ingot, comprising: an open-ended generally rectangular mold cavity having an entry end portion, a discharge end opening, and a movable bottom block adapted to fit within the discharge end and to move axially of the mold during casting, said mold cavity having opposed side walls and opposed end walls adapted to cast a rectangular composite ingot having opposed faces and opposed ends; a divider positioned in said mold cavity and extending across the cavity towards opposite end walls thereof, thereby dividing at least the entry end portion of the mold cavity into first and second feed chambers; a first molten metal feed arrangement for feeding molten metal for a first layer of said composite ingot to one of said feed chambers; and a second molten metal feed arrangement for feeding molten metal for a second layer of said composite ingot to said second feed chamber; wherein said divider has a central part and two opposite end parts, said end parts being oriented relative to said central part such that said second layer of said composite ingot emerging from said discharge end of said mold cavity has end regions adjacent to said opposed ends of said ingot of greater thickness than a central region positioned between said end regions.
Another exemplary embodiment provides an apparatus for casting a composite metal ingot, comprising: an open-ended generally rectangular mold cavity having an entry end portion, a discharge end opening, and a movable bottom block adapted to fit within the discharge end and to move axially of the mold during casting, said mold cavity having opposed side walls and opposed end walls adapted to cast a rectangular composite ingot having opposed faces and opposed ends; a longitudinal divider positioned in said mold cavity and extending across the cavity towards opposite end walls thereof, thereby dividing at least the entry end portion of the mold cavity into first and second feed chambers, said divider being flexible in directions towards and away from said opposed side walls of the mold cavity; a first molten metal feed arrangement for feeding molten metal for a first layer of said composite ingot to one of said feed chambers; a second molten metal feed arrangement for feeding molten metal for a second layer of said composite ingot to said second feed chamber; and flexing equipment acting on said divider to produce flexing of at least a central part of said divider towards and away from one of said opposed side walls at different times during casting.
Yet another exemplary embodiment provides an apparatus for casting a composite metal ingot, comprising: an open-ended generally rectangular mold cavity having an entry end portion, a discharge end opening, and a movable bottom block adapted to fit within the discharge end and to move axially of the mold during casting, said mold cavity having opposed side walls and opposed end walls adapted to cast a rectangular composite ingot having opposed faces and opposed ends; a divider positioned in said mold cavity and extending across the cavity towards opposite end walls thereof, thereby dividing at least the entry end portion of the mold cavity into first and second feed chambers; a first molten metal feed arrangement for feeding molten metal for a first layer of said composite ingot to one of said feed chambers; a second molten metal feed arrangement for feeding molten metal for a second layer of said composite ingot to said second feed chamber, and a guide for said divider, said guide being movable, thereby allowing said divider to be moved at times during casting relative to said mold cavity in directions towards or away from one of said side walls of the mold cavity.
Other exemplary embodiments relate to methods of casting for producing ingots as indicated above.
The term “divider” as used in this specification (both in the description and claims) is intended to include any means for dividing an entry portion of a direct chill casting mold into two internal chambers for continuous metal casting. If the divider is in the form of a continuous sheet or plate fed into the mold and intended to become part of the ingot (e.g. as disclosed in Kilmer et al.), it is referred to herein as a “divider member”. On the other hand, a divider that is cooled and remains stationary in the mold (e.g. as disclosed in Anderson et al.) is referred to herein as a “divider wall”. Of course, the divider may be rigid (as is normally the case for divider walls) or fully or partially flexible (normally more suitable for divider members), at least at the operational temperature of the casting apparatus. The divider may be only movable or only flexible or both movable and flexible. By an appropriate combination of such features, it is possible to produce an ingot having an outer layer that is thicker in any one or all of the head, butt and lateral edge regions to compensate for wiping-off of the peripheral parts of the outer layer during later rolling. It should also be appreciated that, despite such differences in thickness of parts of the outer layer, the overall thickness of the cast ingot is preferably constant throughout (i.e. the thickness of the inner layer is adjusted in such parts to maintain the overall thickness the same).
It is to be noted that that the term “rectangular” as used in this specification is meant to include the term “square”, although ingots intended for rolling are generally not square. The term “generally rectangular” includes small variations from the rectangular outline that are common in ingot casting of this kind. For example, contraction may cause ingot walls to be slightly concave. Precise geometrical shapes are often hard to produce, or unnecessary, in casting procedures of this kind, so the reference to “rectangular” or “square” should be interpreted with this in mind.
It will be seen that the divider member 14 is essentially planar so that the metal layers on each side are of constant thickness at all points between the divider member 14 and the respective rolling face 23 or 24 of the metal layers, both in the transverse and in the longitudinal directions. While this kind of structure is desirable in certain applications, most ingots produced in this way are intended for rolling into sheet or plate of reduced thickness compared to the ingot itself. This involves passing the ingot several times through a rolling mill and there is a tendency for a thinner surface layer 21 (cladding) to be “wiped off” an inner layer 22 (core) towards the ends and the edges of the ingot where pressures exerted by rollers may be significantly increased compared to the remaining area of the ingot structure. The resulting thinning of the cladding layer in the rolled structure can result in significant wastage because the parts of the rolled sheet or plate product not having a required thickness of coating may have to be trimmed off and discarded.
The disadvantage of layer thinning at the transverse edges (width edges) of the rolled structure is addressed by the arrangement shown in
During rolling of an ingot of this structure, the increased thickness of the cladding layer at the lateral edges of the ingot compensates for the loss of the material of this layer caused by “edge-wipe” and thereby reduces or eliminates the need for waste-causing edge-trimming of resulting sheet or plate products. The profile of the divider member is preferably kept constant throughout the entire casting operation to produce a cast ingot having a cladding layer with side edges of increased thickness along the entire length of the ingot. The positions where the ends 26 of the divider member are bent out of the plane of the central section 25, and the angle of the bend in these positions, is of course chosen to cause the thickness of the coating layer to be as uniform as possible in the direction from one lateral side edge to the other in the finished rolled plate or sheet product. Generally, the angle between the ends and central part (i.e. the angle by which the end parts deviate from the planar position) is no more than 30°, and more preferably 15 to 25°. The lengths of the angled ends, in an ingot having a width of 69 inches (753 mm), may be, for example, up to 15 inches (381 mm). The length and angle may have to be varied according to the inherent properties of the metals being cast (particularly the properties of the metal used for the outer layer), the pressures employed during rolling, and the ultimate thickness of the sheet or plate products as well as the cast ingot. However, the required length and thickness for each case can be obtained empirically by carrying out test casts and rollings, or theoretically based on knowledge of the materials involved and the rolling pressures employed. For example, when using aluminum alloy AA4045 as the metal of the outer layer for an ingot, the ingot dimensions may be as follows:
A shown in
As noted above, as well as lateral edge-wiping, so-called head- and butt-wiping may also be experienced during rolling, i.e. loss of cladding metal at the longitudinal ends (head and butt) of a product rolled from an ingot. Suitable compensation for this metal loss can be provided according to the apparatus shown in
Once again, the positions at which the divider member 14 is moved during casting depends on the metals being cast (particularly the metal and thickness of the cladding layer) and can be determined empirically or by calculation. The objective, of course, is to produce a rolled plate or sheet product having a cladding layer with a constant thickness along the entire length the length of the ingot. For example, when using alloy AA4045 as the cladding material for an ingot dimensioned as above, the divider member may be moved at positions approximately 20 inches (508 mm) from the head and the butt ends. The extent by which the divider member is moved again depends on the product being cast, but may represent up to 17% of the thickness of the cladding layer produced during the casting run. However, increases of less than 5%, or even less than 2%, may be satisfactory, depending on the properties desired.
The desired movability of the guiding apparatus 38 can be provided by mounting the guiding apparatus 38 on rails 48 and 49 positioned at the top surface 40 of the mold and moved by a suitable motor, e.g. a linear drive or worm gear (not shown). Once again, the flexibility of the divider member makes this movement possible, as explained above.
In some circumstances, for example with a particular combination of metals used for the core and cladding layers, it may be desirable to provide the divider member 14 with a suitable curve or arch (as seen in a top plan view), at least during a particular stage of the casting procedure, either over the entire width of the divider member or at least in the central part 25 when using the apparatus of
To compensate for such contraction issues, the divider member 14 may be outwardly curved as it is fed into the mold so that, upon solidification of the ingot, the divider member adopts a more planar configuration. This can be achieved, for example, by employing apparatus as shown in
thinning of a cladding layer due to lateral edge-wipe during rolling;
thinning of a cladding layer at the head and butt of an ingot due to head- and butt-wiping during rolling;
concavity of the interface between a core layer and a cladding layer at a central part of an ingot due to metal contraction in the casting run; and
concavity of the rolling faces of the ingot due to metal contraction in the casting run.
When employing sequential casting apparatus of the kind disclosed by Anderson et al., a fixed divider wall is used rather than an elongated flexible divider member that is incorporated into the ingot. As the divider wall remains within the entry portion of the mold, there is no need for the guide rollers shown in the earlier embodiments provided to guide and support the divider member as it moves downwardly through the mold in concert with the casting of the ingot.
This invention claims the priority right of patent application Ser. No. 60/904,212 filed on Feb. 28, 2007 by applicants herein.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
3206808 | Robinson | Sep 1965 | A |
3353934 | Robinson | Nov 1967 | A |
3421569 | Neumann | Jan 1969 | A |
3911996 | Veillette | Oct 1975 | A |
4030536 | Rodenchuk et al. | Jun 1977 | A |
4449568 | Narasimham | May 1984 | A |
4498521 | Takeda et al. | Feb 1985 | A |
4567936 | Binczewski | Feb 1986 | A |
4598763 | Wagstaff et al. | Jul 1986 | A |
4828015 | Takeuchi et al. | May 1989 | A |
5526870 | Odegård et al. | Jun 1996 | A |
5947184 | Steen et al. | Sep 1999 | A |
6158498 | Wagstaff | Dec 2000 | A |
6224992 | Delbeke et al. | May 2001 | B1 |
6260602 | Wagstaff | Jul 2001 | B1 |
6705384 | Kilmer et al. | Mar 2004 | B2 |
6848233 | Haszler et al. | Feb 2005 | B1 |
20020192493 | Magnusen et al. | Dec 2002 | A1 |
20030062143 | Haszler et al. | Apr 2003 | A1 |
20050011630 | Anderson et al. | Jan 2005 | A1 |
20060185816 | Anderson et al. | Aug 2006 | A1 |
20070215312 | Gallerneault | Sep 2007 | A1 |
20070215313 | Wagstaff | Sep 2007 | A1 |
20080008903 | Bull et al. | Jan 2008 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
844 806 | Jul 1952 | DE |
44 20 697 | Dec 1995 | DE |
0 189 313 | Jul 1986 | EP |
0 219 581 | Apr 1987 | EP |
0 636 440 | Feb 1995 | EP |
2835455 | Aug 2003 | FR |
856 424 | Dec 1960 | GB |
1174764 | Dec 1969 | GB |
1184764 | Mar 1970 | GB |
1266570 | Mar 1972 | GB |
2003556 | Mar 1979 | GB |
2204518 | Nov 1988 | GB |
55-68156 | May 1980 | JP |
61-276746 | Dec 1986 | JP |
6-297092 | Oct 1994 | JP |
451496 | Jan 1975 | SU |
1447544 | Dec 1988 | SU |
WO 03006697 | Jan 2003 | WO |
WO 03035305 | May 2003 | WO |
WO 2004112992 | Dec 2004 | WO |
WO 2006053701 | May 2006 | WO |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20080202720 A1 | Aug 2008 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
60904212 | Feb 2007 | US |