Coal slurries are made up of very small particles of coal suspended in water. The particle diameter is typically in the range of 30-90 μm. These slurries present disposal problems for coal mines as well as creating environmental hazards. The purpose of the present invention is to provide an economical method for dewatering the coal slurry in order to be able to substantially reduce or eliminate the waste problem and to be able to put the dried coal particles to use for various beneficial purposes.
Prior art arrangements for dewatering of slurries involve filtration, primarily obtained by passing a pair of filtering cloths and belts through a system of rollers. The feed slurry is introduced between the two filter cloths, which are supported by perforated belts that allow water to fall through the belts. As the belts pass through the rollers, the water is squeezed out of the slurry. After the last set of rollers, the belts are separated and the filter cake is scraped off before the belts are washed by means of water sprays positioned on the return section of the belts.
Since the slurry is in direct contact with the filtering cloths, the cloths tend to become clogged with solids. Eventually, the cleaning with the water sprays fails to clean the filtering cloths sufficiently and they become blinded and must be replaced. A substantial amount of clean water is used for washing the filtering cloths, and this water becomes contaminated with the residual slurry on the filtering cloths and creates an additional waste disposal problem.
One embodiment described herein includes a belt filter with upper and lower belts, wherein the coal slurry is trapped between the two belts. Each belt has a cross-sectional profile with three layers. On a first side of the belt is a porous belt layer. On a second side of the belt is a non-porous belt layer. Between the porous belt layer and the non-porous belt layer is an absorbent belt layer. In operation, the coal slurry is placed in contact with the porous belt layer on the first side of the belt.
As a result of this arrangement, the coal slurry only contacts the porous belt layer. Water from the slurry migrates through this porous belt layer, while the coal slurry solids are “filtered out” and remain on the surface of the porous belt layer where they form a coal slurry cake. The moisture that does get through the porous belt layer is absorbed by the adjacent, absorbent belt layer.
As the belts are fed through the rollers, more of the water is squeezed through the porous belt layer and absorbed by the absorbent belt layer. After the final set of pressure rollers in the process, the slurry cake resting on the surface of the porous belt layer is scraped away and the belts proceed to a wringing station wherein all three layers of each belt are squeezed together to extract the moisture from the absorbent belt layer. At this point, the moisture content of the slurry cake has been reduced from the initial moisture content of about 50% to a moisture content of about 20-25%.
As the belt is squeezed, the absorbed water cannot escape through the non-porous belt layer, as this layer is made from an impermeable material. The primary avenue available for the water to be expelled is by going back through the porous belt layer, wherein the absorbed water backwashes and cleans the porous belt layer. The particles resting on the porous belt layer are pushed back out in a direction that is opposite to the direction in which they entered (backwashed). The water which is used for backwashing is the same water that was removed from the coal slurry (instead of fresh, clean water), resulting in substantial water savings and substantial reduction in waste in the process.
Very briefly, the coal slurry is first deposited on a belt filter press 12 for initial dewatering, as explained in more detail later. The coal cake exiting the filtration stage 12 is then transported by a conveyor belt through a microwave heating chamber 14 where the coal is heated, opening up microscopic pores and fissures to allow the steam generated in the heating process to escape the coal cake. This steam is recycled to the steam jacketed drying stage 16 where the latent heat of vaporization, released by the steam as it condenses on the jacketed wall of the vessel, is used to further heat the coal before it is transferred to the last stage. In the convection drying stage 18, conventional heating is used to drive out the last bit of moisture required to reach the desired degree of moisture in the coal.
Referring to
As the lower belt 24 is driven in the direction of the arrow 34 (clockwise direction), and the upper belt 30 is driven in the direction of the arrow 35 (counterclockwise direction), the coal slurry progresses between a plurality of upper and lower pressure rollers 37, which press the upper and lower belts 30, 24 into intimate contact with the coal slurry, compressing the coal slurry 50 (See
The belts 24, 30 continue traveling, which each belt 24, 30 going through a respective wringing station 40, 42, where the water in the absorbent layer of each belt 24, 30 is squeezed out, as explained later.
Referring to
Referring to
As the absorbed water escapes through the water permeable side 58, it backflushes coal particles remaining on the water permeable side 58, which were not scraped off by the scraper blades 38 (See
As the absorbed water is backflushed out of the belt, it is received in a trough 46 (See
It will be obvious to those skilled in the art that modifications may be made to the embodiments described above without departing from the scope of the present invention as defined by the claims.
This application claims priority from U.S. Provisional Application Ser. No. 61/548,680, filed Oct. 18, 2011. The present invention relates to a coal slurry dewatering arrangement. In particular, it relates to a filter belt arrangement for use in dewatering a coal slurry.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
1986897 | Shaw | Jan 1935 | A |
2176902 | Horrocks | Oct 1939 | A |
2207278 | Albrecht | Jul 1940 | A |
3018563 | Bridges et al. | Jan 1962 | A |
3204764 | Prins | Sep 1965 | A |
3338411 | Von Der Gathen et al. | Aug 1967 | A |
3361259 | Von Der Gathen et al. | Jan 1968 | A |
3552031 | Evans et al. | Jan 1971 | A |
3601039 | Schover | Aug 1971 | A |
3669011 | Jacquelin | Jun 1972 | A |
3982052 | Bearce | Sep 1976 | A |
4011623 | Pabst et al. | Mar 1977 | A |
4208188 | Dick, Jr. | Jun 1980 | A |
4285816 | Lee | Aug 1981 | A |
4330413 | Wilson | May 1982 | A |
4347137 | Dick, Jr. | Aug 1982 | A |
4371376 | Dick, Jr. | Feb 1983 | A |
4475453 | Davis | Oct 1984 | A |
4477358 | Heintges et al. | Oct 1984 | A |
4526121 | Shudo et al. | Jul 1985 | A |
4544490 | Erickson et al. | Oct 1985 | A |
4662894 | Greenwald, Sr. | May 1987 | A |
4681033 | Crandall et al. | Jul 1987 | A |
4961862 | Janecek | Oct 1990 | A |
5236596 | Greenwald, Sr. | Aug 1993 | A |
5413703 | Greenwald, Sr. | May 1995 | A |
5462425 | Kuss et al. | Oct 1995 | A |
5795484 | Greenwald, Sr. | Aug 1998 | A |
5862746 | Bielfeldt | Jan 1999 | A |
6544425 | Miller | Apr 2003 | B2 |
7381329 | Moss | Jun 2008 | B1 |
7383766 | McIntosh et al. | Jun 2008 | B2 |
7571816 | Osborne et al. | Aug 2009 | B2 |
7964105 | Moss | Jun 2011 | B2 |
8092691 | Youngs et al. | Jan 2012 | B2 |
8286801 | Youngs et al. | Oct 2012 | B2 |
20020139754 | Miller | Oct 2002 | A1 |
20030146167 | Miller | Aug 2003 | A1 |
20040237809 | McIntosh et al. | Dec 2004 | A1 |
20070151147 | Learey et al. | Jul 2007 | A1 |
20070215527 | Osborne | Sep 2007 | A1 |
20100025306 | Osborne et al. | Feb 2010 | A1 |
20100032384 | Moss | Feb 2010 | A1 |
20100224574 | Youngs et al. | Sep 2010 | A1 |
20110089122 | Smith | Apr 2011 | A1 |
20120103893 | Youngs et al. | May 2012 | A1 |
20130233778 | Moss | Sep 2013 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
61548680 | Oct 2011 | US |