The production of hydrocarbons from a reservoir oftentimes carries with it the incidental production of non-hydrocarbon gases. Such gases include contaminants such as hydrogen sulfide (H2S) and carbon dioxide (CO2). When H2S or CO2 are produced as part of a hydrocarbon stream (such as methane or ethane), the raw gas stream is sometimes referred to as “sour gas.” The H2S and CO2 are often referred to together as “acid gases.”
In addition to hydrocarbon production streams, acid gases may be associated with synthesis gas streams, or with refinery gas streams. Acid gases may also be present within so-called flash-gas streams in gas processing facilities. Further, acid gases may be generated by the combustion of coal, natural gas, or other carbonaceous fuels.
Gas and/or hydrocarbon fluid streams may contain not only H2S or CO2, but may also contain other “acidic” impurities. These include mercaptans and other trace sulfur compounds (SOx). In addition, natural gas streams may contain water. Indeed, water is the most common contaminant in many natural gas streams. Such impurities should be removed prior to industrial or residential use.
Processes have been devised to remove contaminants from a raw natural gas stream. In the case of acid gases, cryogenic gas processing is sometimes used, particularly to remove CO2 to prevent line freezing and plugged orifices. In other instances, particularly with H2S removal, the hydrocarbon fluid stream is treated with a solvent. Solvents may include chemical solvents such as amines. Examples of amines used in sour gas treatment include monoethanol amine (MEA), diethanol amine (DEA), and methyl diethanol amine (MDEA).
Physical solvents are sometimes used in lieu of amine solvents. Examples include physical solvents currently marketed under the brand names Selexol® (comprising dimethyl ethers of polyethylene glycol) and Rectisol™ (comprising methanol). In some instances hybrid solvents, meaning mixtures of physical and chemical solvents, have been used. An example of one such hybrid solvent is currently marketed under the brand name Sulfinol® (comprising sulfolane, water, and one or more amines). However, the use of amine-based acid gas removal solvents is most common.
Amine-based solvents rely on a chemical reaction with the acid gases. The reaction process is sometimes referred to as “gas sweetening.” Such chemical reactions are generally more effective than the physical-based solvents, particularly at feed gas pressures below about 300 pounds per square inch absolute (psia) (about 20 bar). There are instances where special chemical solvents such as Flexsorb® (comprising hindered amine) are used, particularly for selectively removing H2S from H2S and CO2-containing gas and/or hydrocarbon fluid streams.
As a result of the gas sweetening process, a treated or “sweetened” gas stream is created. The sweetened gas stream is substantially depleted of H2S and/or CO2 components. The sweetened gas can be further processed for liquids recovery, that is, by condensing out heavier hydrocarbon gases. The sweet gas may be sold into a pipeline or may be used for liquefied natural gas (LNG) feed. In addition, the sweetened gas stream may be used as feedstock for a gas-to-liquids process, and then ultimately used to make waxes, butanes, lubricants, glycols and other petroleum-based products. The extracted CO2 may be sold, or it may be injected into a subterranean reservoir for enhanced oil recovery operations.
When a natural gas stream contains water, a dehydration process is usually undertaken before or after acid gas removal. This is done through the use of glycol or other desiccant in a water separator. The dehydration of natural gas is done to control the formation of gas hydrates and to prevent corrosion in distribution pipelines. The formation of gas hydrates and corrosion in pipelines can cause a decrease in flow volume as well as frozen control valves, plugged orifices and other operating problems.
Traditionally, the removal of acid gases or water using chemical solvents or desiccants involves counter-currently contacting the raw natural gas stream with the chemical. The raw gas stream is introduced into the bottom section of a contacting tower, or absorption tower. At the same time, the solvent solution is directed into a top section of the tower. The tower has trays, packing, or other “internals.” As the solvent cascades through the internals, it absorbs the undesirable components, carrying them away through the bottom of the contacting tower as part of a “rich” solvent solution. At the same time, gaseous fluid that is largely depleted of the undesirable components exits at the top of the tower.
The rich solvent or rich glycol, as the case may be, that exits the contactor is sometimes referred to as an absorbent liquid. Following absorption, a process of regeneration (also called “desorption”) may be employed to separate contaminants from the active solvent of the absorbent liquid. This produces a “lean” solvent or a “lean” glycol that is then typically recycled into the contacting tower for further absorption.
While perhaps capable of performing desired contacting for removal of contaminants from a gas and/or hydrocarbon-containing fluid stream, historic contactor designs have had difficulty scaling-up from lab and/or pilot-sized units to units capable of efficiently processing up to a billion standard cubic feet per day (BSFD) of gas. Past scale-up designs have high capital expenses (e.g., due to having larger and more pieces of equipment, more complicated transportation and installation, etc.) and high operational expenses (e.g., due to less reliability and/or operability, larger size and weight equipment, etc.). Consequently, a need exists for a contacting designs that is smaller, has fewer pieces of equipment, has improved operability and reliability, is easier to transport and install, and weighs less than traditional contacting equipment.
The disclosure includes a method, comprising passing a fluid into a co-current contactor, passing a solvent into the co-current contactor, dividing the solvent into solvent droplets having a first average droplet size, placing the fluid in contact with the solvent droplets to create a combined stream, coalescing at least a portion of the solvent droplets to create solvent droplets having a second average droplet size, wherein the second average droplet size is greater than the first average droplet size, and separating the fluid and the solvent.
The disclosure includes a co-current contactor apparatus, comprising a first inlet configured to receive a first fluid stream proximate to a first end of the co-current contactor, a second inlet configured to receive a second fluid stream proximate to the first end of the co-current contactor, an inlet section configured to atomize at least a portion of the second fluid stream, a mass transfer section configured to receive the first fluid stream and the atomized second fluid stream, and to pass the atomized second fluid stream and the first fluid stream as a combined stream, a coalescer configured receive the combined stream, and to increase an average droplet size of the atomized second fluid stream, and a separator configured to separate at least a portion of the atomized second fluid stream from the combined stream.
The disclosure includes a co-current contacting system, comprising a plurality of co-current contactors coupled in a counter-current configuration, wherein each co-current contactor comprises a first inlet configured to receive a first fluid stream proximate to a first end of the co-current contactor, a second inlet configured to receive a second fluid stream proximate to the first end of the co-current contactor, an inlet section configured to atomize at least a portion of the second fluid stream, a mass transfer section configured to receive the first fluid stream and the atomized second fluid stream, and to pass the atomized second fluid stream and the first fluid stream as a combined stream, a coalescer configured to receive the combined stream, and to increase the average droplet size of the atomized second fluid stream, and a separator configured to separate at least a portion of the atomized second fluid stream from the combined stream.
It is understood that the methods above may be used to remove a contaminant, e.g., an acid gas component, a water component, etc., from other fluid streams. These separated fluid streams may include, for example, a sour water stream, a flash-gas stream, or a Claus tail gas stream.
So that the manner in which the present invention can be better understood, certain illustrations, charts and/or flow charts are appended hereto. It is to be noted, however, that the drawings illustrate only selected embodiments of the inventions and are therefore not to be considered limiting of scope, for the inventions may admit to other equally effective embodiments and applications.
As used herein, an “acid gas” means any gas that dissolves in water producing an acidic solution. Non-limiting examples of acid gases include hydrogen sulfide (H2S), carbon dioxide (CO2), sulfur dioxide (SO2), carbon disulfide (CS2), carbonyl sulfide (COS), mercaptans, or mixtures thereof.
As used herein, the term “atomize” means to divide, reduce, or otherwise convert a liquid into minute particles, a mist, or a fine spray of droplets having an average droplet size within a predetermined range.
As used herein, the term “co-current contacting device” or “co-current contactor” means an apparatus, e.g., a pipe, a vessel, a housing, an assembly, etc., that receives (i) a stream of gas (or other fluid stream to be treated) and (ii) a separate stream of solvent (or other fluid treating solution) in such a manner that the gas stream and the solvent stream contact one another while flowing in generally the same direction within the contacting device.
As used herein, the term “contaminant” means an acid gas, water, another undesirable component, or a combination thereof absorbable by a selected solvent.
As used herein, the term “flue gas” means any gas stream generated as a by-product of hydrocarbon combustion.
As used herein, the term “fluid” refers to gases, liquids, and combinations of gases and liquids, as well as to combinations of gases and solids, and combinations of liquids and solids.
As used herein, the term “hydrocarbon” refers to an organic compound that includes primarily, if not exclusively, the elements hydrogen and carbon. Hydrocarbons generally fall into two classes: aliphatic, or straight chain hydrocarbons, and cyclic, or closed ring, hydrocarbons including cyclic terpenes. Examples of hydrocarbon-containing materials include any form of natural gas, oil, coal, and bitumen that can be used as a fuel or upgraded into a fuel.
As used herein, the term “industrial plant” refers to any plant that generates a stream containing at least one hydrocarbon or an acid gas. One non-limiting example is a coal-powered electrical generation plant. Another example is a cement plant that emits CO2 at low pressures.
With respect to fluid processing equipment, the term “inline” may mean that two or more items are placed along a flow line such that a fluid stream undergoing fluid separation moves from one item of equipment to the next while maintaining flow in a substantially constant downstream direction, and/or that the two or more items are connected sequentially or, more preferably, are integrated into a single tubular device.
As used herein, the terms “lean” and “rich,” with respect to the absorbent liquid removal of a selected gas component from a gas stream, are relative, merely implying, respectively, a lesser or greater degree of content of the selected gas component. The respective terms “lean” and “rich” do not necessarily indicate or require, respectively, either that an absorbent liquid is totally devoid of the selected gaseous component, or that it is incapable of absorbing more of the selected gas component. In fact, it is preferred, as will be evident hereinafter, that the so called “rich” absorbent liquid produced in a first contactor in a series of two or more contactors retains significant or substantial residual absorptive capacity. Conversely, a “lean” absorbent liquid will be understood to be capable of substantial absorption, but may retain a minor concentration of the gas component being removed.
As used herein, the term “natural gas” refers to a multi-component gas obtained from a crude oil well (associated gas) or from a subterranean gas-bearing formation (non-associated gas). The composition and pressure of natural gas can vary significantly. A typical natural gas stream contains methane (C1) as a significant component. The natural gas stream may also contain ethane (C2), higher molecular weight hydrocarbons, one or more acid gases, and water. The natural gas may also contain minor amounts of contaminants such as nitrogen, iron sulfide, and wax.
As used herein, the term “non-absorbing gas” means a gas that is not absorbed by a solvent during a gas treating or conditioning process, e.g., during co-current contacting.
As used herein, the term “solvent” means a liquid phase fluid or a multiphase fluid (a fluid comprising both a liquid and gas phase) that preferentially absorbs one or more component over other components. For example, a solvent may preferentially absorb a contaminant, e.g., acid gas, thereby removing or “scrubbing” at least a portion of the contaminant from a contaminated stream, e.g., a contaminated natural gas stream.
As used herein, the term “sweetened gas stream” refers to a fluid stream in a substantially gaseous phase that has had at least a portion of acid gas components removed. Further, the term “sweetened” may also refer to a fluid stream that has been subjected to a dehydration or other conditioning process.
The gas processing system 100 may employ a number of vertically oriented co-current contacting systems 104A-F. In some embodiments, each vertically oriented co-current contacting system 104A-F includes vertically oriented co-current contactor upstream of a separation system. In other embodiments, each vertically oriented co-current contacting system 104A-F includes a number of vertically oriented co-current contactors upstream of a single separation system. As would be apparent to those of skill in the art, any or all of the co-current contacting systems 104A-F may be either vertically oriented or horizontally oriented, depending on the details of the specific implementation, and such alternate embodiments are within the scope of this disclosure.
The gas stream 102 may be a natural gas stream from a hydrocarbon production operation. For example, the gas stream 102 may be a flue gas stream from a power plant, or a synthesis gas (syn-gas) stream. If the natural gas stream 102 is a syn-gas stream, the gas stream 102 may be cooled and filtered before being introduced into the gas processing system 100. The gas stream 102 may also be a flash gas stream taken from a flash drum in a gas processing system itself. In addition, the gas stream 102 may be a tail gas stream from a Claus sulfur recovery process or an impurities stream from a regenerator. Furthermore, the gas stream 102 may be an exhaust emission from a cement plant or other industrial plant. In this instance, CO2 may be absorbed from excess air or from a nitrogen-containing flue gas.
The gas stream 102 may include a non-absorbing gas, such as methane, and one or more impurities, such as an acid gas. For example, the gas stream 102 may include CO2 or H2S. The gas processing system 100 may convert the gas stream 102 into a sweetened gas stream 106 by removing the acid gases.
In operation, the gas stream 102 may be flowed into a first co-current contacting system 104A, where it is mixed with a solvent stream 108. If the gas processing system 100 is to be used for the removal of H2S, or other sulfur compounds, the solvent stream 108 may include an amine solution, such as monoethanol amine (MEA), diethanol amine (DEA), or methyldiethanol amine (MDEA). Other solvents, such as physical solvents, alkaline salts solutions, or ionic liquids, may also be used for H2S removal. In embodiments used for other purposes, such as dehydration or reactions, other solvents or reactants, such as glycols, may be used. The solvent stream 108 may include a lean solvent that has undergone a desorption process for the removal of acid gas impurities. For example, in the gas processing system 100 shown in
In various embodiments, the gas processing system 100 employs a series of co-current contacting systems 104A-F. In some embodiments, as shown in
Before entering the first co-current contacting system 104A, the natural gas stream 102 may pass through an inlet separator 114. The inlet separator 114 may be used to clean the natural gas stream 102 by filtering out impurities, such as brine and drilling fluids. Some particle filtration may also take place. The cleaning of the natural gas stream 102 can prevent foaming of solvent during the acid gas treatment process.
As shown in
Once inside the first co-current contacting system 104A, the natural gas stream 102 and the solvent stream 108 move along the longitudinal axis of the first co-current contacting system 104A. As they travel, the solvent stream 108 interacts with the H2S, H2O, and/or other impurities in the natural gas stream 102, causing the H2S, H2O, and/or other impurities to chemically attach to or be absorbed by the amine molecules. A first partially-loaded, or “rich,” gas solvent or treating solution 118A may be flowed out of the first co-current contacting system 104A. In addition, a first partially-sweetened natural gas stream 120A may be flowed out of the first co-current contacting system 104A and into a second co-current contacting system 104B. This general arrangement may be referred to as arranging co-current contactors in a counter current configuration.
As shown in the example illustrated in
As the progressively-sweetened natural gas streams 120A-E are generated, the gas pressure in the gas processing system 100 will gradually decrease. As this occurs, the liquid pressure of the progressively-richer gas treating solutions 118A-F may be correspondingly increased. This may be accomplished by placing one or more booster pumps (not shown) between each co-current contacting system 104A-F to boost liquid pressure in the gas processing system 100.
In the gas processing system 100, solvent streams may be regenerated by flowing the partially-loaded gas treating solutions 118A and 118B through a flash drum 121. Absorbed natural gas 122 may be flashed from the partially-loaded gas treating solutions 118A and 118B within the flash drum 121, and may be flowed out of the flash drum 121 via an overhead line 124.
The resulting rich solvent stream 126 may be flowed from the flash drum 121 to the regenerator 110. The rich solvent stream 126 may be introduced into the regenerator 110 for desorption. The regenerator 110 may include a stripper portion 128 including trays or other internals (not shown). The stripper portion 128 may be located directly above a heating portion 130. A heat source 132 may be provided with the heating portion 130 to generate heat. The regenerator 110 produces the regenerated, lean solvent stream 112 that is recycled for re-use in the final co-current contacting system 104F. Stripped overhead gas from the regenerator 110, which may include concentrated H2S (or CO2), may be flowed out of the regenerator 110 as an overhead impurities stream 134.
The overhead impurities stream 134 may be flowed into a condenser 135, which may cool the overhead impurities stream 134. The resulting cooled impurities stream 138 may be flowed through a reflux accumulator 140. The reflux accumulator 140 may separate any remaining liquid, such as condensed water, from the impurities stream 138. This may result in the generation of a substantially pure acid gas stream 142, which may be flowed out of the reflux accumulator 140 via an overhead line 144.
In some embodiments, if the initial natural gas stream 102 includes CO2, and a CO2-selective solvent stream 108 is used, the acid gas stream 142 includes primarily CO2. The CO2-rich acid gas stream 142 may be used as part of a miscible EOR operation to recover oil. If the oil reservoir to be flooded does not contain a significant amount of H2S or other sulfur compounds, the CO2 to be used for the EOR operation may not contain significant H2S or other sulfur compounds. However, concentrated CO2 streams from oil and gas production operations may be contaminated with small amounts of H2S. Thus, it may be desirable to remove the H2S from the CO2, unless the acid gas stream 142 is to be injected purely for geologic sequestration.
While a gas stream 102 is discussed herein, those of skill in the art will appreciate that generally the same principles may be applied to any fluid stream, including with respect to liquid-liquid contacting. Consequently, use of the phrases “gas stream,” “gas inlet,” “gas outlet,” etc. are to be understood as non-limiting and may optionally be replaced with “fluid stream,” “fluid inlet,” “fluid outlet,” and so forth in various embodiments within the scope of this disclosure. Use of the phrases “gas stream,” “gas inlet,” “gas outlet,” etc. are for the sake of convenience only.
In some embodiments, if the initial natural gas stream 102 includes H2S, an H2S-selective solvent stream 108 may be used to capture the H2S. The H2S may then be converted into elemental sulfur using a sulfur recovery unit (not shown). The sulfur recovery unit may be a so-called Claus unit. Those of ordinary skill in the art will understand that a “Claus process” is a process that is sometimes used by the natural gas and refinery industries to recover elemental sulfur from H2S-containing gas streams.
In practice, the “tail gas” from the Claus process, which may include H2S, SO2, CO2, N2, and water vapor, can be reacted to convert the SO2 to H2S via hydrogenation. The hydrogenated tail gas stream has a high partial pressure, a large amount of CO2, e.g., more than 50%, and a small amount of H2S, e.g., a few percent or less. This type of gas stream, which is typically near atmospheric pressure, is amenable to selective H2S removal. The recovered H2S may be recycled to the front of the Claus unit, or may be sequestered downstream. Alternatively, a direct oxidation of the H2S to elemental sulfur may be performed using various processes known in the field of gas separation.
As shown in
The lean solvent stream 112 may be at a low pressure. Accordingly, the lean solvent stream 112 may be passed through a pressure boosting pump 150. From the pressure boosting pump 150, the lean solvent stream 112 may be flowed through a cooler 154. The cooler 154 may cool the lean solvent stream 112 to ensure that the lean solvent stream 112 will absorb acid gases effectively. The resulting cooled lean solvent stream 156 is then used as the solvent stream for the final co-current contacting system 104F.
In some embodiments, a solvent tank 158 is provided proximate the final co-current contacting system 104F. The cooled lean solvent stream 156 may be flowed from the solvent tank 158. In other embodiments, the solvent tank 158 is off-line and provides a reservoir for the lean solvent stream 156.
The process flow diagram of
Because the partially-loaded gas treating solution 118B received by the first co-current contacting system 104A in
Alternatively, a semi-lean liquid stream could be taken from other sweetening operations in the gas processing system 160 and used, at least in part, as an amine solution for the first or second co-current contacting system 104A or 104B. In this respect, there are situations in which a single type of solvent is used for more than one service in the gas processing system 160. This is referred to as integrated gas treatment. For example, MDEA may be used both for high-pressure, H2S-selective acid gas removal, as well as in a Claus tail gas treating (TGT) process. The rich amine stream from the TGT process is not heavily loaded with H2S and CO2, owing to the low pressure of the process. Thus, in some embodiments, the rich amine stream from the TGT process is used as a semi-lean stream for the first or second co-current contacting system 104A or 104B. The semi-lean stream (not shown) may be pumped to a suitable pressure and injected into the first or second co-current contacting system 104A or 104B, possibly along with the partially-loaded gas treating solution from the succeeding co-current contacting system.
Further, in the gas processing system 160 of
The process flow diagram of
In operation, each contacting unit 202a-202d receives a natural gas stream 102 at an inlet section 220a-220d, where the inlet nozzles 208a-208d atomize a lean solvent stream 206 and expose it to the natural gas stream 102, creating a mixed, two-phase flow or combined stream (not depicted). The mixed, two-phase flow or combined stream passes through a mass transfer section 222 where absorption occurs. The mass transfer section 222 may comprise a tubular body having a substantially empty bore having one or more surface features, e.g., a hydrophobic surface, a superhydrophobic surface, a raised surface, a recessed surface, or any combination thereof, along an inner surface of the mass transfer section 222. A separation section 224 follows the mass transfer section. In the separation section 224, entrained liquid droplets are removed from the gas stream, e.g., using a cyclone inducing element, resulting in an at least partially dehydrated and/or decontaminated treated gas stream. In some embodiments, the inlet section 220 and the mass transfer section 222 may collectively be referred to as a contacting section. The length of the contacting section may be determined based on the residence time required to obtain a predetermined decontamination and/or dehydration level for the natural gas stream 102, e.g., in view of the intended flow rate, pressure drop, etc. The treated gas stream exits the contacting units 202a-202d through the outlet section 226. The contacting units 202a-202d may operate at about 400 psig to about 1,200 psig, or higher. Because the contacting units 202a-202d must be individually constructed so as to tolerate these pressures, weight and/or footprint increases linearly as the number of contacting units 202a-202d is increased.
As co-current contactors become more compact, both in length and diameter, it is important to ensure as much solvent as possible reacts in the increasingly shortened mixing and/or mass transfer section. The H2S reaction is instantaneous relative to the CO2 reactions, lowering the residence time, i.e., the contact time between the vapor and liquid phases, will result in less CO2 being absorbed into the solvent. The design of the co-current contacting systems 104A-F enhances selective H2S removal due to the short contact time inherent in the equipment design. Disclosed herein are techniques for inhibiting or impeding an amount of liquid from propagating along a wall of the mass transfer section using a surface feature. By inhibiting or impeding liquid propagation along a wall of the mass transfer section, a comparatively greater amount of solvent is retained in the interior volume of the mass transfer section and, consequently, remains available for reaction.
In operation, the solvent entering the coalescing section 402 may have an average droplet size in a range from a first average droplet size to a second average droplet size, wherein the first average droplet size is any of: less than about 1 micrometer (μm), about 1 μm, about 5 μm, about 10 μm, about 25 μm, about 50 μm, about 75 μm, about 100 μm, about 250 μm, about 500 μm, or about 750 μm, and wherein the second average droplet size is any of: about 2 μm, about 5 μm, about 10 μm, about 25 μm, about 50 μm, about 75 μm, about 100 μm, about 250 μm, about 500 μm, about 750 μm, or about 1000 μm. After passing through the one or more coalescer(s) 404, the solvent may have an average droplet size in a range from a first average droplet size to a second droplet size, wherein the first average droplet size is any of: about 1 μm, about 5 μm, about 10 μm, about 25 μm, about 50 μm, about 75 μm, about 100 μm, about 250 μm, about 500 μm, about 750 μm, about 1000 μm, about 2500 μm, about 5000 μm, about 7500 μm, or about 9000 μm, and wherein the second average droplet size is any of: about 2 μm, about 5 μm, about 10 μm, about 25 μm, about 50 μm, about 75 μm, about 100 μm, about 250 μm, about 500 μm, about 750 μm, about 1000 μm, about 2500 μm, about 5000 μm, about 7500 μm, or about 10000 μm. In embodiments with a pre-coalescer, after passing through the pre-coalescer, the solvent may have an average droplet size in a range from a first average droplet size to a second droplet size, wherein the first average droplet size is any of: about 1 μm, about 5 μm, about 10 μm, about 25 μm, about 50 μm, about 75 μm, about 100 μm, about 250 μm, about 500 μm, about 750 μm, about 1000 μm, about 2500 μm, about 5000 μm, about 7500 μm, or about 9000 μm, and wherein the second average droplet size is any of: about 2 μm, about 5 μm, about 10 μm, about 25 μm, about 50 μm, about 75 μm, about 100 μm, about 250 μm, about 500 μm, about 750 μm, about 1000 μm, about 2500 μm, about 5000 μm, about 7500 μm, or about 10000 μm.
The average residence time in the coalescer for a gas-liquid contacting system may be in a range from a first average residence time to a second average residence time, wherein the first average residence time is any of: less than about 0.01 seconds (s), about 0.01 s, about 0.1 s, or about 0.2 s, and wherein the second average residence time is any of: about 0.01 s, about 0.1 s, or about 0.2 s. The average residence time in the coalescer for a liquid-liquid contacting system may be in a range from a first average residence time to a second average residence time, wherein the first average residence time is any of: less than about 0.1 seconds (s), about 1 s, about 5 s, or about 10 s, and wherein the second average residence time is any of: about 1 s, about 5 s, about 10 s, or about 15 s.
While it will be apparent that the invention herein described is well calculated to achieve the benefits and advantages set forth above, it will be appreciated that the invention is susceptible to modification, variation and change without departing from the spirit thereof.
This application claims the priority benefit of U.S. Patent Application 62/132,631 filed Mar. 13, 2015 entitled COALESCER FOR CO-CURRENT CONTACTORS, the entirety of which is incorporated by reference herein.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
1951647 | Cooke | Mar 1934 | A |
2847200 | Ung | Aug 1958 | A |
3767766 | Tjoa et al. | Oct 1973 | A |
3773472 | Hausberg et al. | Nov 1973 | A |
3989811 | Hill | Nov 1976 | A |
4073832 | McGann | Feb 1978 | A |
4204934 | Warren et al. | May 1980 | A |
4318717 | Sohier | Mar 1982 | A |
4369167 | Weir, Jr. | Jan 1983 | A |
4405580 | Stogryn et al. | Sep 1983 | A |
4421725 | Dezael et al. | Dec 1983 | A |
4589896 | Chen et al. | May 1986 | A |
4603035 | Connell et al. | Jul 1986 | A |
4678648 | Wynn | Jul 1987 | A |
4701188 | Mims | Oct 1987 | A |
4752307 | Asmus et al. | Jun 1988 | A |
4824645 | Jones et al. | Apr 1989 | A |
4885079 | Eppig et al. | Dec 1989 | A |
5067971 | Bikson et al. | Nov 1991 | A |
5085839 | Scott et al. | Feb 1992 | A |
5091119 | Biddulph et al. | Feb 1992 | A |
5093094 | Van Kleek et al. | Mar 1992 | A |
5186836 | Gauthier et al. | Feb 1993 | A |
5209821 | Shaw et al. | May 1993 | A |
5439509 | Spink et al. | Aug 1995 | A |
5462584 | Gavlin et al. | Oct 1995 | A |
5603908 | Yoshida et al. | Feb 1997 | A |
5648053 | Mimura et al. | Jul 1997 | A |
5664426 | Lu | Sep 1997 | A |
5713985 | Hamilton | Feb 1998 | A |
5735936 | Minkkinen et al. | Apr 1998 | A |
5810897 | Konosu | Sep 1998 | A |
5837105 | Stober et al. | Nov 1998 | A |
5907924 | Collin et al. | Jun 1999 | A |
5988283 | Gann | Nov 1999 | A |
6063163 | Carmody | May 2000 | A |
6071484 | Dingman et al. | Jun 2000 | A |
6089317 | Shaw | Jul 2000 | A |
6214097 | Laslo | Apr 2001 | B1 |
6228145 | Falk-Pedersen et al. | May 2001 | B1 |
6284023 | Torkildsen et al. | Sep 2001 | B1 |
6830608 | Peters | Dec 2004 | B1 |
6881389 | Paulsen et al. | Apr 2005 | B2 |
7018451 | Torkildsen et al. | Mar 2006 | B1 |
7128276 | Nilsen et al. | Oct 2006 | B2 |
7144568 | Ricard et al. | Dec 2006 | B2 |
7152431 | Amin et al. | Dec 2006 | B2 |
7175820 | Minkkinen et al. | Feb 2007 | B2 |
RE39826 | Lu | Sep 2007 | E |
7273513 | Linga et al. | Sep 2007 | B2 |
7560088 | Keller et al. | Jul 2009 | B2 |
7811343 | Toma | Oct 2010 | B2 |
8071046 | Hassan et al. | Dec 2011 | B2 |
8137444 | Farsad et al. | Mar 2012 | B2 |
8240640 | Nakayama | Aug 2012 | B2 |
8268049 | Davydov | Sep 2012 | B2 |
8336863 | Neumann et al. | Dec 2012 | B2 |
8343360 | Schook | Jan 2013 | B2 |
8454727 | Dunne et al. | Jun 2013 | B2 |
8475555 | Betting et al. | Jul 2013 | B2 |
8652237 | Heldebrant et al. | Feb 2014 | B2 |
8741127 | Koseoglu et al. | Jun 2014 | B2 |
8899557 | Cullinane | Dec 2014 | B2 |
8900347 | Boulet et al. | Dec 2014 | B2 |
9149761 | Northrop et al. | Oct 2015 | B2 |
9192896 | Hassan et al. | Nov 2015 | B2 |
9238193 | Ji et al. | Jan 2016 | B2 |
9353315 | Heath et al. | May 2016 | B2 |
9599070 | Huntington et al. | Mar 2017 | B2 |
9764252 | Whitney et al. | Sep 2017 | B2 |
9902914 | Mak | Feb 2018 | B2 |
20010037876 | Oost et al. | Nov 2001 | A1 |
20030005823 | LeBlanc et al. | Jan 2003 | A1 |
20030155438 | Boee et al. | Aug 2003 | A1 |
20040092774 | Mimura et al. | May 2004 | A1 |
20050006086 | Gramme | Jan 2005 | A1 |
20060123993 | Henriksen | Jun 2006 | A1 |
20060185320 | Dureiko | Aug 2006 | A1 |
20070205523 | Kojima | Sep 2007 | A1 |
20080006011 | Larnholm et al. | Jan 2008 | A1 |
20080107581 | Sparling et al. | May 2008 | A1 |
20080115532 | Jager | May 2008 | A1 |
20080190291 | Krehbiel et al. | Aug 2008 | A1 |
20080257788 | Leito | Oct 2008 | A1 |
20080290021 | Buijs et al. | Nov 2008 | A1 |
20090213687 | Linga et al. | Aug 2009 | A1 |
20090241778 | Lechnick et al. | Oct 2009 | A1 |
20100229725 | Farstad et al. | Sep 2010 | A1 |
20110036122 | Betting et al. | Feb 2011 | A1 |
20110168019 | Northrop et al. | Jul 2011 | A1 |
20110185633 | Betting et al. | Aug 2011 | A1 |
20110217218 | Gupta | Sep 2011 | A1 |
20110296869 | Buhrman et al. | Dec 2011 | A1 |
20120060691 | Bieri et al. | Mar 2012 | A1 |
20120204599 | Northrop et al. | Aug 2012 | A1 |
20120240617 | Weiss et al. | Sep 2012 | A1 |
20130017144 | Menzel | Jan 2013 | A1 |
20140033921 | Peck et al. | Feb 2014 | A1 |
20140123851 | Jamtvedt et al. | May 2014 | A1 |
20140245889 | Hamre et al. | Sep 2014 | A1 |
20140331862 | Cullinane et al. | Nov 2014 | A1 |
20140335002 | Northrop et al. | Nov 2014 | A1 |
20140366446 | Sharma et al. | Dec 2014 | A1 |
20140373714 | Cloud et al. | Dec 2014 | A1 |
20150013539 | Eriksen et al. | Jan 2015 | A1 |
20150083425 | Sullivan et al. | Mar 2015 | A1 |
20150135954 | Li et al. | May 2015 | A1 |
20150191360 | Weiss et al. | Jul 2015 | A1 |
20150267871 | Murray, Sr. | Sep 2015 | A1 |
20150322580 | Little | Nov 2015 | A1 |
20150352463 | Grave et al. | Dec 2015 | A1 |
20160060190 | Trucko et al. | Mar 2016 | A1 |
20160136569 | Lee et al. | May 2016 | A1 |
20160199774 | Grave et al. | Jul 2016 | A1 |
20160236140 | Northrop et al. | Aug 2016 | A1 |
20160263516 | Freeman et al. | Sep 2016 | A1 |
20160288045 | Kramer et al. | Oct 2016 | A1 |
20170145803 | Yeh et al. | May 2017 | A1 |
20170157553 | Northrop et al. | Jun 2017 | A1 |
20170184392 | Huntington et al. | Jun 2017 | A1 |
20170239612 | Mondkar et al. | Aug 2017 | A1 |
20180071674 | Freeman et al. | Mar 2018 | A1 |
20180361307 | Yeh et al. | Dec 2018 | A1 |
20180361309 | Yeh et al. | Dec 2018 | A1 |
20180362858 | Ramkumar et al. | Dec 2018 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
2144585 | Jun 1996 | CA |
10162457 | Jul 2003 | DE |
0191985 | Aug 1986 | EP |
0301623 | Feb 1989 | EP |
1438484 | Apr 2003 | EP |
1141520 | May 2003 | EP |
1340536 | Sep 2003 | EP |
2134446 | Sep 2015 | EP |
1234862 | Jun 1971 | GB |
1377026 | Dec 1974 | GB |
1579249 | Nov 1980 | GB |
2079177 | Jan 1982 | GB |
2094951 | Sep 1982 | GB |
2414688 | Dec 2006 | GB |
48-066073 | Sep 1971 | JP |
53-032109 | Mar 1978 | JP |
06-170153 | Dec 1992 | JP |
2014-000500 | Jan 2014 | JP |
WO1993010883 | Jun 1993 | WO |
WO1997046304 | Dec 1997 | WO |
WO1999013966 | Mar 1999 | WO |
WO2000056844 | Sep 2000 | WO |
WO2002032536 | Apr 2002 | WO |
WO2003072226 | Sep 2003 | WO |
WO2004070297 | Aug 2004 | WO |
WO-2009140993 | Nov 2009 | WO |
WO2013136310 | Sep 2013 | WO |
WO2014042529 | Mar 2014 | WO |
WO2014094794 | Jun 2014 | WO |
WO2014106770 | Jul 2014 | WO |
WO2015013539 | Jan 2015 | WO |
WO2015105438 | Jul 2015 | WO |
WO2015167404 | Nov 2015 | WO |
WO2016064825 | Apr 2016 | WO |
Entry |
---|
U.S. Appl. No. 62/117,234, filed Feb. 17, 2015, Northrop, P. Scott et al. |
U.S. Appl. No. 14/948,422, filed Nov. 23, 2015, Grave, Edward J. et al. |
U.S. Appl. No. 62/548,171, filed Aug. 21, 2017, Denton, Robert D. et al. |
U.S. Appl. No. 62/548,172, filed Aug. 21, 2017, Denton, Robert D. et al. |
Carter, T. et al. (1998) “Addition of Static Mixers Increases Capacity in Central Texas Gas Plant,” Proc. of the 77th GPA Annual Conv., pp. 110-113. |
Dow Chemical Company (Mar. 3, 2015) “Product Safety Assessment,” SELEXOL Solvents Product Brochure, 3 pages. |
Garrison, J. et al. (2002) “Keyspan Energy Canada Rimbey Acid Gas Enrichment with FLEXSORB SE PLUS Technology,” Proceedings 2002 Laurance Reid Gas Conditioning Conf., Norman, OK, 8 pgs. |
Hanna, James M. (2009) “Qatargas Expansion Projects: Why Change the Gas Treating Concept from Sulfinol-D?,” OSGAT 2009 Proceedings 5th Int'l Conf., Mar. 31-Apr. 1, Abu Dhabi, UAE, 33 pgs. |
Jones, S. G. et al. (2004) “Design, Cost & Operation of an Acid Gas Enrichment & Injection Facility,” Proceedings 2004 Laurance Reid Gas Conditioning Conf., Norman, OK, 43 pgs. |
Linga, H. et al. (2001) “New Selective H2S Removal Process for the Refining Industry,” Nat'l Petrochemical & Refiners Assoc., AM-01-35, 9 pgs. |
Linga, H. et al. (2006) “Potentials and Applications for the Pro-Pure Co-Current Contactors,” 13th Annual India Oil & Gas Rev. Symp., Mumbai, India, 24 pgs. |
Nilsen, F. et al. (2001) “Selective H2S Removal in 50 Milliseconds,” Gas Processors Assoc., Europe Annual Conference, 12 pgs. |
Nilsen, F. et al. (2002) “Novel Contacting Technology Selectively Removes H2S,” Oil & Gas Journal., 17 pgs. |
Nilsen, F. et al. (2002) “Selective H2S Removal Applications using Novel Contacting Technology,” Gas Processors Assoc., 13 pgs. |
Nova Molecular Technologies, Inc. (Jul. 17, 2008) “Product Brochure,” FLEXSORB SE, 1 page. |
ProSep, Inc. (2007) “Selective H2S-Removal with Amines (ProCap),” Product Brochure, 32 pgs. |
ProSep, Inc. (2014) “ProDry,” Gas Portfolio Product Brochure, 1 pg. |
ProSep, Inc. (2014) “ProScav,” Gas Portfolio Product Brochure, 1 pg. |
Puukilainen, E. et al. (2007) “Superhydrophobic Polyolefin Surfaces: Controlled Micro- an Nanostructures,” Dept. of Chemistry, Univ. of Joensuu, Langmuir, v. 23, No. 13, pp. 7263-7268. |
Royan, T. et al. (1992) “Acid Gas Enrichment using FLEXSORB,” Proceedings 1992 Laurance Reid Gas Conditioning Conf., Norman, OK, Mar. 2-4, 17 pgs. |
Schutte & Koerting (2012) “Gas Scrubbers,” Product Brochure, 14 pgs. |
Smith, W. B. (2010) “Typical Amine and Glycol Treating Unit Compared to Gas Membrane Separation System for Wellhead CO2 Trimming,” Laurance Reid Gas Conditioning Conf., Norman, OK, Feb. 21-24, 2010, pp. 417-436. |
True, Warran R. (1994) “New Mobile Bay Complex Exploits Major Sour Gas Reserve,” Oil & Gas Journal, v. 92, No. 21, 4 pgs. |
Weiland, R. H. (2008) “Acid Gas Enrichment—Maximizing Selectivity,” Proceedings 2008 Laurance Reid Gas Conditioning Conf., Clarita, OK, 16 pgs. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20160263516 A1 | Sep 2016 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
62132631 | Mar 2015 | US |