The present invention relates generally to ballistic structures such as tiles, plates, or armor whether for a person, vehicle, or aircraft and, more particularly, to a coated ballistic structure capable of encapsulation in a molten metal.
Desired armor protection levels can usually be obtained if weight is not a consideration. However, in many armor applications, there is a premium put on lightweight armor. Some areas of application where lightweight armor are important include ground combat and tactical vehicles, portable hardened shelters, helicopters, and various other aircraft used by the Army and the other Services. Another example of an armor application in need of reduced weight is personnel body armor worn by soldiers and law enforcement personnel.
There are two prevalent hard passive armor technologies in general use. The first and most traditional approach makes use of metals such as armor grade steel. The second approach uses ceramics. Each material has certain advantages and limitations. Broadly speaking, metals are more ductile and are generally superior at withstanding multiple hits. However, they typically have a large weight penalty and are not as efficient at stopping armor-piercing threats. Ceramics are extraordinarily hard, strong in compression, lighter weight, and brittle, making them efficient at eroding and shattering armor-piercing threats, but not as effective at withstanding multiple hits.
Attempts to take advantage of the best characteristics of the metal and the ceramic have been tried. For example, ceramic tiles have been encapsulated in a metal framework using a hot-press process followed by extensive grinding and finishing to produce an acceptable armor article. The grinding and finishing (post-processing) steps are expensive and time consuming processes. Moreover, additional processing is required to build the metal matrix or frame that connects multiple ceramic tiles. The metal frame is typically a piece of solid steel precision machined to create openings that mirror the tile dimensions or is slightly undersized then heated and the tiles are shrink fit into the matrix. Metal plates are then added to both the front and back of the metal frame and super-plastically bonded to the metal frame thus totally encapsulating the tiles. This process is lengthy and costly.
One such method of encasing ceramic tiles in a metal frame is disclosed in U.S. Pat. No. 5,686,689 to Snedeker, et al. Ceramic tiles were placed into individual cells of a metallic frame consisting of a backing plate and thin surrounding walls. A metallic cover was then welded over each cell, encasing the ceramic tiles. A benefit to encasing the ceramic tile is that once fractured pieces cannot move away easily and a degree of protection is maintained in the area of the ceramic tile.
Substantial development efforts are ongoing with metal encapsulated ceramic tiles or plates to find more cost-effective and faster production methods that utilize the advantages of both materials to maintain or lower the armor's weight and to decrease the negative effects of fractured tiles such as reduced penetration resistance and damage to neighboring tiles, while also improving the ceramic's integrity during the metal encapsulation process.
Durable ceramic and metallic coatings applied to ceramic substrates of various shapes and sizes suitable for ballistic and/or armor applications are disclosed herein that protect the tiles while undergoing a molten metal casting operation. The ceramic and metallic coatings are preferably plasma sprayed coating that include a ceramic top coat layer of aluminum oxide, zirconium oxide, or other oxides with or without a metallic bond coat layer. This coating protects the underlying ceramic tile, which is composed of boron carbide, silicon carbide, alumina (Al2O3) or other type of hard ceramic, from reacting chemically with the molten metal. Molten metal is cast around the ceramic tiles to create a lattice of ceramic tiles that are used for protection from projectiles and shrapnel.
The following detailed description will illustrate the general principles of the invention, examples of which are additionally illustrated in the accompanying drawings. In the drawings, like reference numbers indicate identical or functionally similar elements.
Armor components disclosed herein provide the ability for ceramic tiles to be successfully encapsulated in metal via a casting process utilizing molten metal to form an armor member. The armor member and the method of making the same do not chemically degrade or crack the ceramic tiles or the surrounding steel. The armor components comprise a ceramic substrate or other similar hard substrate suitable for ballistic and/or armor applications coated with a material that protects the underlying ceramic tile from chemical and thermal interactions with the molten metal during the casting process. The coating on the tiles also minimizes stresses, coating spallation, delamination caused by the molten metal and/or by the solidifying metal (including the change in stresses when the metal changes from molten to solid).
One challenge is to cast the molten metal (for example, steel) around the tile without cracking the tile. The mismatch in the coefficient of thermal expansion (“CTE”) of the tile relative to the metal causes relatively high thermal loading and strain in both the tile and the surrounding metal, which may both crack. To adequately address the CTE mismatch, reduce processing risk, and improve the ballistic performance, a coating, in particular a thermal sprayed coating such as a plasma sprayed coating, a flamed coating, or any variation of a thermal coating, is applied to the tile. In one embodiment, the coating is applied to a SiC or Al2O3 ceramic tile, which is then cast into a steel matrix.
As seen in
The core of the armor component 10, as mentioned above, is preferably a tile 12 or plate of or including a ceramic material selected from the group consisting of aluminum oxide, silicon carbide, boron carbide, titanium diboride, aluminum nitride, silicon nitride and tungsten carbide. Tile 12 may also be made of any hard, high compressive strength material having a Vickers hardness of about 12 GPa or greater and a compressive strength of about 2 GPa or greater.
The material for the coating 14 may be, but is not limited to, a plasma-sprayable ceramic or cermet material such as aluminum oxide, magnesium aluminate spinel, zirconium oxide, other oxides, and combinations thereof “Cermet” means a material comprising a metal or a metal alloy and a ceramic powder or a mixture of ceramic powders. Cermet is fabricated from the ceramic powder selected from a group of compounds represented and exemplified by the titanium-aluminum oxide system. Other systems, such as and including zirconium, hafnium, beryllium, vanadium oxides, nitrates, silicates or borides, etc., in combination with a metal, such as titanium, aluminum, magnesium, nickel, lithium, calcium, or their alloys are equally suitable for fabrication of cermets of the invention. In addition to these named systems, any other suitable alloy system meeting the general conditions for processing of the cermets may also be advantageously used to fabricate these cermets using the molten-metal-infiltration method and process and are intended to be within the scope of the invention. In one embodiment, the cermet may be a mixture of a ceramic, such as for example, aluminum oxide, zirconium oxide, hafnium oxide, beryllium oxide, vanadium oxide, boron carbide, aluminum nitride, zirconium nitride, hafnium nitride, vanadium nitride, aluminum boride, zirconium boride, hafnium boride, vanadium boride, aluminum silicate, zirconium silicate, hafnium silicate, vanadium silicate powders or their mixtures, in combination with a metal such as titanium, aluminum, magnesium, nickel, lithium, calcium, or other suitable metals, or their alloys, etc.
These materials may be provided as a powder for use in plasma spraying. The powder may have an average particle size of about 5 μm to about 120 μm, preferably about 10 μm to about 50 μm.
The coating 14, which forms a layer on the tile 12 as illustrated in
In one embodiment, the coating 14 may be a functionally graded coating applied to tile 12 where the surface coating CTE will match that of the tile surface and functionally change as one moves further from the tile surface. The outer or exposed part of the coating will ultimately match the surrounding metal matrix CTE (metal that is poured to encapsulate the tiles). When the metal is investment cast around the tiles and begins to solidify, the stresses will be reduced on the metal matrix and the tile surface as the CTE mismatch is minimized. An important feature of these coatings is their ability to form a barrier layer between the tile and the molten metal to eliminate degradation of the tiles whether chemical or mechanical.
As shown in
The optional metallic bond coating 19 may be a metal or metal alloy layer applied to coating 14. The metal or metal alloy may be a powder for thermal spray applications such that the bond coat may be provided as a plasma spray coating. The metallic bond coating 19 may be applied at a thickness of about 0.002 to about 0.004 inches. In one embodiment, the metallic bond coating 19 is about 0.003 inches thick. The metal or metal alloy may be a powder, for example, but not limited to, an aluminum, cobalt, copper, iron, molybdenum, nickel metal or metal alloys.
Referring now to
In another embodiment, the photograph of
One method of encapsulating one or more tiles 12 in molten metal is an investment casting technology called foam pattern technology (“FOPAT”). Foam pattern casting is advantageous over the lost-wax method for casting an array of armor components because it is more rigid and dimensionally more stable. FOPAT uses various polymers in combination with a modified reaction injection molding process and alternate tooling methods to produce investment casting patterns. The reaction injection molding is a polymer fabrication technique involving the extremely rapid impingement mixing of two chemically reactive liquid streams that are injected into a mold, resulting in simultaneous polymerization, cross-linking, and formation of the desired shape.
Thereafter, the foam pattern 54 is invested in a mold, as in conventional investment mold production, for example, as shown in
This process does not require a pattern removal step and eliminates the need for an autoclave, which is used to melt and remove wax patterns. Instead, the foam material portion of the foam pattern is burned out during the firing of the ceramic shell 56. Foam pattern technology, with its stronger patterns and unique flow characteristics, is ideal for thin and complex sections. Other benefits of the foam pattern technology include essentially no pattern shrinkage (i.e., stable pattern yield with no shell cracking defects), stronger patterns (enable insertion of the ceramic tiles without pattern defects), stiffer patterns (improves handling, which avoids creep issue experiences with wax molds), pattern storage and shipment without damage or distortion, cost savings (potentially 30% cheaper per pattern), minimal heating required (foam reaction occurs at room temperature), and reduced cost of injection tooling since the foam is injected at lower pressures than wax.
In an alternate method, the foam pattern 54 may be suspended in a vessel that is filled with compacted sand, which is then heated to evaporate the foam material. Thereafter, molten metal may be poured into the vacancies left by the evaporated foam material to form an armor member.
This application claims the benefit of U.S. Provisional Application No. 61/702,772 filed Sep. 19, 2012.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
4945814 | Huet | Aug 1990 | A |
5043182 | Schultze et al. | Aug 1991 | A |
5194202 | Yun et al. | Mar 1993 | A |
5211776 | Weiman | May 1993 | A |
5361678 | Roopchand et al. | Nov 1994 | A |
5686689 | Snedeker et al. | Nov 1997 | A |
5763813 | Cohen et al. | Jun 1998 | A |
6143432 | de Rochemont et al. | Nov 2000 | A |
6601497 | Ghiorse et al. | Aug 2003 | B2 |
6737105 | Richard | May 2004 | B2 |
7069836 | Palicka et al. | Jul 2006 | B1 |
7077306 | Palicka et al. | Jul 2006 | B2 |
7128963 | Benitsch | Oct 2006 | B2 |
7157158 | Collier et al. | Jan 2007 | B2 |
7833627 | Ferrando | Nov 2010 | B1 |
7910219 | Withers et al. | Mar 2011 | B1 |
7926543 | Sugawara et al. | Apr 2011 | B2 |
8047116 | Neal et al. | Nov 2011 | B2 |
8091204 | DiPietro | Jan 2012 | B2 |
8377512 | Chu et al. | Feb 2013 | B2 |
8628857 | Simovich | Jan 2014 | B2 |
8960262 | Grozdanich et al. | Feb 2015 | B2 |
20110017056 | Chu et al. | Jan 2011 | A1 |
20110220280 | DiPietro | Sep 2011 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
101158564 | Apr 2008 | CN |
101658973 | Mar 2010 | CN |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20140208929 A1 | Jul 2014 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
61702772 | Sep 2012 | US |