Coated cemented carbide cutting tool insert

Information

  • Patent Grant
  • 8455116
  • Patent Number
    8,455,116
  • Date Filed
    Thursday, May 29, 2008
    16 years ago
  • Date Issued
    Tuesday, June 4, 2013
    11 years ago
Abstract
The present invention relates to PVD coated cemented carbide cutting tool inserts semifinishing and finishing metal cutting operations. The cemented carbide cutting tool insert comprises a substrate and a wear resistant coating. The substrate comprises in addition to WC, from about 5.5 to about 8.5 wt-% Co and Cr such that the Cr/Co weight ratio is from about 0.08 to about 0.12 and also small amounts of Ti and Ta. The wear resistant coating is a homogeneous AlxTi1−xN-layer with x equals from about 0.6 to about 0.67. The thickness of this layer is from about 1 to about 3.8 μm.
Description
CROSS-REFERENCE TO PRIOR APPLICATION

This application claims priority to Swedish Patent Application No. 0701320-4 filed Jun. 1, 2007 and Swedish Patent Application No. 0800367-5 filed Feb. 18, 2008, which is incorporated by reference herein.


BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION

The present invention relates to a coated cemented carbide cutting tool insert. More specifically the invention relates to PVD coated cemented carbide cutting tool inserts for semifinishing or finishing metal cutting operations.


High performance cutting tools must possess high wear resistance, high toughness properties and good resistance to plastic deformation. This is particularly valid when the cutting operation is carried out at high cutting speeds and/or at high feed rates when large amount of heat is generated.


Cemented carbide grades for metal machining applications generally contain WC, γ-phase, which is a solid solution of generally TiC, NbC, TaC and WC, and a binder phase, generally Co and/or Ni. WC—Co cemented carbides having a fine grain size less than about 1 μm are produced through the incorporation of grain growth inhibitors such as V, Cr, Ti, Ta and combinations thereof in the initial powder blend. Typical inhibitor additions are from about 0.5 to about 5 wt-% of the binder phase.


OBJECTS AND SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION

It is an object of the present invention to provide inserts with a coated cemented carbide with improved wear resistance without sacrificing toughness and edge security, particularly useful for semifinishing or finishing operations of metal materials.


This object is solved by providing a cemented carbide insert of a WC+Co— substrate with fine grain size provided with a PVD coating.


In one aspect of the present invention, there is provided a cemented carbide cutting tool insert comprising a substrate and a wear resistant coating wherein the substrate comprises WC, from about 5.5 to about 8.5 wt-% Co and Cr such that the Cr/Co weight ratio is from about 0.08 to about 0.12, and also Ti and Ta in such amounts that the ratio of Me/Co=(at % Ti+at % Ta)/at % Co is less than or equal to about 0.014−(CW—Cr)*0.008 and higher than about 0.0005 and CW—Cr is from about 0.75 to about 0.95, whereby the CW—Cr is defined as CW—Cr=(magnetic-% Co+1.13*wt-% Cr)/wt-% Co where magnetic-% Co is the weight percentage of magnetic Co and wt-% Co is the weight percentage of Co in the cemented carbide, the coercivity is more than about 20 kA/m, and the wear resistant coating is a homogeneous AlxTi1−xN-layer where x equals from about 0.6 to about 0.67, with thickness of more than about 1 μm, but less than about 3.8 μm, both composition and thickness being measured on the flank face about 0.2 mm below the nose radius and in the center of the cutting edge.


In another aspect of the present invention, there is provided a method of making a cemented carbide cutting tool insert comprising a substrate and a wear resistant coating comprising the following steps: providing a substrate comprising WC, from about 5.5 to about 8.5, wt-% Co and Cr such that the Cr/Co weight ratio is 0.08-0.12 and also Ti and Ta in such amounts that the ratio of Me/Co=(at % Ti+at % Ta)/at % Co is less than or equal to about 0.014−(CW—Cr)*0.008 and higher than about 0.0005 and the CW—Cr is from about 0.75 to about 0.95, where the CW—Cr is defined as CW—Cr=(magnetic-% Co+1.13*wt-% Cr)/wt-% Co where magnetic-% Co is the weight percentage of magnetic Co and wt-% Co is the weight percentage of Co in the cemented carbide and the coercivity is more than about 20 kA/m by: wet milling submicron powders of tungsten carbide, cobalt, Ti and Ta added as TiC, TaC, (Ti,W)C, (Ta,W)C or (Ti,Ta,W)C and at least one of Cr3C2, Cr23C6 and Cr7C3 to obtain a slurry, drying the slurry to obtain a powder, pressing the powder to inserts, sintering the inserts in vacuum, possibly performing an isostatic gas pressure step during sintering temperature or at the final stage of sintering, possibly grinding the inserts to requested shapes, depositing by arc evaporation technique whilst maintaining a partial pressure of nitrogen in the recipient and using the appropriate selection of active evaporation sources and rates, a wear resistant coating comprising a homogeneous AlxTi1−xN-layer with x equals from about 0.6 to about 0.67, and a thickness of the layer of more than about 1 μm, but less than about 3.8 μm, the composition and the thickness being measured on the flank face about 0.2 mm below the nose radius and in the center of the cutting edge.


Still further aspects of the invention relate to the uses of the cemented carbide cutting tool insert described above in certain milling and turning operations.







DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE PREFERRED EMBODIMENTS

According to the present invention, there is provided coated cemented carbide shaped inserts for semifinishing or finishing machining of metals, comprising a cemented carbide substrate, a wear resistant coating, and different insert geometries. The substrate comprises in addition to WC from about 5.5 to about 8.5, preferably from about 6 to about 8, wt-% Co and Cr such that the Cr/Co weight ratio is from about 0.08 to about 0. 12, preferably from about 0.09 to about 0.11. The substrate also contains Ti and Ta in such amounts that the ratio

Me/Co=(at % Ti+at % Ta)/at % Co

is less than or equal to about 0.014−(CW—Cr)*0.008 and higher than 0.0005, preferably higher than about 0.0007 and the CW—Cr ratio is from about 0.75 to about 0.95, preferably from about 0.78 to about 0.93, where

CW—Cr=(magnetic-% Co+1.13*wt-% Cr)/wt-% Co

where magnetic-% Co is the weight percentage of magnetic Co and wt-% Co is the weight percentage of Co in the cemented carbide. The CW—Cr ratio is a function of the W content in the Co binder phase. A CW—Cr of about 1 corresponds to a low W-content in the binder phase and a CW—Cr of from about 0.75 to about 0.8 corresponds to a high W-content in the binder phase.


The coercivity is more than about 20 kA/m, preferably from about 23 to about 29 kA/m.


The sintered body may also contain small amounts of precipitations of additional phase or phases such as eta-phase, MX or M7X3, M3X2 where M=(Ti+Ta+Co+Cr+W) and X═C or N allowed to a maximum of 5.0 vol % without detrimental effects.


The wear resistant coating comprises a homogeneous AlxTi1−xN-layer with x equals from about 0.6 to about 0.67, preferably x equals about 0.62. The thickness of the layer is more than about 1 μm, preferably more than about 1.8 μm but less than about 3.8 μm, preferably less than about 3.0 μm. Both the composition and the thickness are measured on the flank face of the insert from about 0.2 mm below the nose radius and in the center of the cutting edge.


The present invention also relates to a method of making cemented carbide cutting tool inserts for semifinishing or finishing operations in milling applications, comprising the following steps:


providing a cemented carbide substrate with a composition according to above by:

    • wet milling submicron powders of tungsten carbide, cobalt, Ti and Ta added as TiC, TaC, (Ti,W)C, (Ta,W)C or (Ti,Ta,W)C and at least one of Cr3C2, Cr23C6 and Cr7C3 to obtain a slurry,
    • drying the slurry to obtain a powder,
    • pressing the powder to inserts,
    • sintering the inserts in vacuum,
    • possibly performing an isostatic gas pressure step during sintering temperature or at the final stage of sintering
    • possibly grinding the inserts to desired shapes
    • depositing by arc evaporation technique whilst maintaining a partial pressure of nitrogen in the recipient, and using the appropriate selection of active evaporation sources and rates, a wear resistant coating comprising a homogeneous AlxTi1−xN-layer with x equals from about 0.6 to about 0.67, preferably x equals about 0.62. The thickness of the layer is more than about 1 μm, preferably more than about 1.8 μm but less than about 3.8 μm, preferably less than about 3.0 μm, the composition and the thickness being measured on the flank face from about 0.2 mm below the nose radius and in the center of the cutting edge.


A first embodiment the present invention relates to the use of inserts according to above for die and mold semifinishing and finishing operations in milling applications of work pieces with a hardness of from about 30 to about 65 HRC.


A second embodiment the present invention relates to the use of inserts according to above for machining of heat resistant super alloys (HRSA), as Inconel 718, Inconel 625, Waspaloy or Udimet 720,

    • at cutting speeds of from about 20 to about 180 m/min, feed rates of from about 0.05 to about 0.3 mm/rev and depth of cut of from about 0.2 to about 0.6 mm in turning applications and
    • at cutting speeds of from about 15 to about 180 m/min, tooth feed of from about 0.05 to about 0.2 mm/tooth and axial depth of cut of from about 0.25 to about 7 mm in milling applications.


A third embodiment the present invention relates to the use of inserts according to above for machining of stainless steel, such as AISI/SAE 304, San-Mac 316L, SAF2205 or SAF2507,

    • at cutting speeds of from about 7 to about 200 m/min, feed rates of from about 0.1 to about 0.4 mm/rev and depth of cut of from about 0.3 to about 2.5 mm in turning applications and
    • at cutting speeds of from about 60 to about 200 m/min, tooth feed of from about 0.05 to about 0.2 mm/tooth and axial depth of cut of from about 0.5 to about 2.5 mm in milling applications.


A fourth embodiment the present invention relates to the use of inserts according to above for milling of tool steel at a cutting speed from about 70 up to about 120 m/min, a feed from about 0.1 to about 0.35 mm/tooth and depth of cut from about 1 to about 3 mm.


A fifth embodiment the present invention relates to the use of inserts according to above for turning of hardened steel, at a cutting speed from about 40 up to about 60 m/min and a feed from about 0.03 to about 0.05 mm/rev and depth of cut from about 0.2 to about 0.5 mm.


A sixth embodiment the present invention relates to the use of inserts according to above for milling of hard cast steel, at a cutting speed from about 50 up to about 100 m/min and a feed from about 0.1 to about 0.3 mm/tooth and depth of cut from about 0.50 to about 1.5 mm.


A seventh embodiment the present invention relates to the use of inserts according to above for machining of cast iron,

    • at cutting speeds of from about 200 to about 400 m/min, feed rates of from about 0.1 to about 0.5 mm/rev and depth of cut of from about 0.5 to about 4 mm in turning applications and
    • at cutting speeds of from about 150 to about 350 m/min, tooth feed of from about 0.05 to about 0.3 mm/tooth and axial depth of cut of from about 0.05 to about 2.5 mm in milling applications.


The invention is additionally illustrated in connection with the following examples, which are to be considered as illustrative of the present invention. It should be understood, however, that the invention is not limited to the specific details of the examples.


EXAMPLE 1

Tungsten carbide powder, 7 wt % very fine grained cobalt powder and 0.7 wt-% Cr added as H. C. Starck fine grained Cr3C2-powder, 0.014 wt-% Ti and 0.010 wt-% Ta, added as TiC and TaC, were wet milled together with conventional pressing agents. After milling and spray drying, the powder was pressed to shape blanks for inserts and sintered at 1410° C. The sintered material had a coercivity of 27 kA/m corresponding to a WC grain size of about 0.8-0.9 μm. Substrate data are summarized in the table below.





























0.014-



W % Ti
W % Ta
Me/Co
W % Co
W % Cr
W % Cr/w % Co
CW—Cr
(CW—Cr)*0.008
























Substrate
0.014
0.010
0.0029
7.00
0.70
0.10
0.85
0.0062


data









The so obtained cemented carbide inserts were ground to obtain the finished shapes.


The as-ground inserts were wet cleaned. A homogeneous (Ti,Al)N layer was deposited by cathodic arc evaporation using a target material consisting of a Ti0.33Al0.67 alloy in an N2 gas atmosphere. The thickness of the layer was 2.5 μm and was a homogeneous layer with the composition Al0.62Ti0.38N as determined by EDS-analysis.


EXAMPLE 2

Inserts from Example 1 were tested and compared with inserts of a commercially available market reference (grade, coating, shape) for the intended application area. Wear resistance test was done.


The test represents the upper range in terms of work piece hardness.


Type of Test


A die and mold application, a straight shaped mold with the cutter body in the orthogonal milling position.


















Machine:
Deckel Maho, DMU60T



Work piece steel
DIN 1.2320, HRC 62



Cuffing speed, Vc (m/min)
70



Insert ref:
PPH1600CL1



Tooth feed, fz, (mm/tooth)
0.36



Depth of cut, Axial/Radial(mm)
0.25/0.3



Ø effective
3.40 mm = constant



Cooling
Dry



Tool life criterion
Max flank wear 0.15 mm



Result:
Tool life



Invention (from Example 1)
100 min (flank wear = 0.12 mm)



Commercial reference leader
45 min (flank wear = 0.15 mm)










There is a significant improvement in comparison to the commercial reference which is optimised for this range of work piece hardness. This clearly expresses the superior wear resistance of the invented tool. The commercial tool failed to meet the demanded tool life, whereas the invented tool had a superior tool life with better cutting edge integrity.


EXAMPLE 3

Inserts from Example 1 were tested and compared with inserts of a commercially available reference (grade, coating, shape) for the intended application area. This is a toughness demanding test in die and mold application before tempering the material. The machining situation was a very typical application. It represents, in terms of work piece hardness, the lower end of the application area in die and mold applications.


Type of Test


Semifinishing a cavity, with the cutter body orthogonally oriented to the bottom surface of the mold


















Work piece steel
DIN 1.2343 at 32 HRC



Cutting speed, Vc (m/min)
196



Insert ref:
RDHW12T3MOENF6-91



Tooth feed, fz, mm/tooth
1



Depth of cut, Axial/Radial (mm)
1/35



Cooling
dry



Tool life criterion
cutting time



Result:



Invention (from Example 1)
135 min



Commercial reference
120 min










The improvement compared to the commercial reference, which is fully designed for semi-finishing machining in this application, shows the excellent comportment of the invented tool.


EXAMPLE 4

Inserts from Example 1 were tested and compared with inserts of a commercially available market reference (grade, coating, shape) for Milling-Finishing of heat resistant super alloys (HRSA).












Test 1


















Machine:
AXA VSC50



Work piece:
INCONEL 718



Cutting speed Vc (m/min)
20



Milling cutter reference
RT10032005QWC32050R



Insert ref:
RT100304R11



Tooth feed, fz (mm/tooth)
0.1



Depth of cut Axial/Radial (mm)
2/20



Coolant:
Emulsion 6%



Tool life criterion
cutting time 22 min










Result invention vs commercial reference leader


flank wear invention=0.04 mm


flank wear commercial ref=0.4 mm












Test 2
















Machine:
DMG DMU60T


Work piece:
UNS R 31537 (Co = 28%; Cr = 6%)


Cutting speed Vc (m/min)
20


Milling cutter diameter
RT1002003QWC20030R


Insert ref:
RT100304R11


Tooth feed, fz (mm/tooth)
0.1


Depth of cut Axial/Radial (mm)
7/10


Coolant:
Emulsion









Result invention vs commercial reference leader


flank wear invention=0.05 mm (cutting time 11 min)


flank wear commercial ref=0.35 mm (cutting time 11 min)


EXAMPLE 5

Inserts from Example 1 were tested and compared with inserts of a commercially available market reference (grade, coating, shape) for Milling-Finishing of Stainless Steel












Test 1


















Machine:
CU HURCO VMX80



Work piece:
304L



Cutting speed Vc (m/min)
200



Milling cutter reference
RT1002504CMC3040R



Insert ref:
RT10T3C5ER81



Tooth feed, fz (mm/tooth)
0.1



Depth of cut Axial/Radial (mm)
2/12



Coolant:
Dry










Tool life criterion cutting time 12 min


Result invention vs commercial reference leader


Flank wear invention=0.04 mm


flank wear commercial ref=0.1 mm












Test 2


















Machine:
DMG DMU60T



Work piece:
304L



Cutting speed Vc (m/min)
150



Milling cutter reference
RT1002003QWC20030R



Insert ref:
RT100304R11



Tooth feed, fz (mm/tooth)
0.07



Depth of cut Axial/Radial (mm)
2/15



Coolant:
dry










Result invention vs commercial reference leader


flank wear invention=0.05 mm (cutting time 12 min)


flank wear commercial ref=0.8 mm (cutting time 4 min)


EXAMPLE 6

Inserts from Example 1 were tested and compared with inserts of a commercially available market reference (grade, coating, shape) for Milling-Finishing of Cast Iron












Test 1


















Machine:
LINEA



Work piece:
DIN 0.6030



Cutting speed Vc (m/min)
250



Milling cutter ref =
NN85-12/125-24-AL40-063



Insert ref:
SNHF1204FN-EN11ET



Tooth feed, fz (mm/tooth)
0.05



Depth of cut Axial/Radial (mm)
0.07/175










Coolant: Emulsion


Result invention vs commercial reference leader=Increase in tool life by 30%












Test 2


















Machine:
HERMLE U 1130



Work piece:
DIN 0.7040



Cutting speed Vc (m/min)
300



Milling cutter diameter
Ø160



Insert ref:
TPKN1603PDSR2C



Tooth feed, fz (mm/tooth) =
0.1



Depth of cut Axial/Radial(mm)
0.05/100



Coolant:
Emulsion










EXAMPLE 7

Inserts from Example 1 were tested and compared with inserts of a commercially available market reference (grade, coating, shape) for Milling-Finishing of hard cast steel












Test 1
















Machine:
AXA VSC 50


Work piece steel:
Austenitic steel with



Carbides, C = 1.15 (Hardness 55HRc)


Cutting speed Vc (m/min)
80


Milling cutter diameter
Ø130


Insert ref:
SPEN120408


Tooth feed, fz (mm/tooth)
0.2


Depth of cut Axial/Radial (mm)
1.5/25


Coolant:
dry









Result invention vs commercial reference leader


improvement of 20% in tool life












Test 2


















Machine:
DMG DMU60T



Work piece steel:
DIN 1.2739 (60 HRc)



Cutting speed Vc (m/min)
65



Milling cutter reference
RT1003205QWC32050R



Insert ref:
RT10T3C5R81



Tooth feed, fz (mm/tooth)
0.1



Depth of cut Axial/Radial (mm)
1/10



Coolant:
Dry










Result invention vs commercial reference leader


flank wear invention=0.2 mm


flank wear commercial ref=0.35 mm


EXAMPLE 8

Inserts from Example 1 were tested and compared with inserts of a commercially available market reference (grade, coating, shape) for Milling Semi Finishing & Light Roughing of tool steel












Test 1


















Machine:
Line C3N 2 FR



Work piece steel:
DIN 1.3401



Cutting speed Vc (m/min)
80



Milling cutter diameter
Ø130



Insert ref:
SPEN120408



Tooth feed, fz (mm/tooth)
0.3



Depth of cut Axial/Radial (mm)
2/10



Coolant:
dry










Result invention vs commercial reference leader


improvement of 30% in tool life












Test 2


















Machine:
AXA VSC50



Work piece steel:
1.2340



Cutting speed Vc (m/min)
100



Milling cutter reference
RT1003205QWC32050R



Insert ref:
RT10T3C5R81



Tooth feed, fz (mm/tooth)
0.15



Depth of cut Axial/Radial (mm)
2/25



Coolant:
Dry










Result invention vs commercial reference leader


flank wear invention=0.1 mm (9 parts machined)


flank wear commercial ref=0.4 mm (1 part machined)


EXAMPLE 9

Inserts from Example 1 were tested and compared with inserts of a commercially available market reference (grade, coating, shape) for Milling-SemiFinishing & Light Roughing of HRSA












Test 1


















Machine:
Milling Center



Work piece:
2.4375



Cutting speed Vc (m/min)
100



Milling cutter reference
PPH16/02-QW16-032



Insert ref:
PPH1600CL1



Tooth feed, fz (mm/tooth)
0.1



Depth of cut Axial/Radial (mm)
0.25/0.25



Coolant:
Emulsion



Tool life criterion
5 parts










Result invention vs commercial reference leader


flank wear invention=0.06 mm


flank wear commercial ref=0.3 mm












Test 2


















Machine:
CU Correa



Work piece:
STELLITE 21



Cutting speed Vc (m/min)
180



Milling cutter diameter
PPH32/02-QC32-186



Insert ref:
PPH3200CL1



Tooth feed. fz (mm/tooth)
0.16



Depth of cut Axial/Radial (mm)
1/1.6



Coolant:
Yes










Result invention vs commercial reference leader


cutting speed increased by 50%


EXAMPLE 10

Inserts from Example 1 were tested and compared with inserts of a commercially available market reference (grade, coating, shape) for Milling-Semi Finishing and Light Roughing of Stainless Steel












Test 1


















Machine:
CU HURCO VMX80



Work piece:
304L



Cutting speed Vc (m/min)
120



Milling cutter reference
RT1002504CMC3040R



Insert ref:
RT10T3C5ER81



Tooth feed, fz (mm/tooth)
0.15



Depth of cut Axial/Radial (mm)
2/10



Coolant:
Dry



Tool life criterion
cutting time 5 min










Result invention vs commercial reference leader


flank wear invention=0.08 mm


flank wear commercial ref=0.12 mm












Test 2


















Machine:
PCI Meteor 10



Work piece:
304L



Cutting speed Vc (m/min)
150



Milling cutter reference
RT1002003QWC20030R



Insert ref:
RT100308R31



Tooth feed, fz (mm/tooth)
0.1



Depth of cut Axial/Radial (mm)
2/15



Coolant:
Yes



Tool life criterion
Max flank wear 0.3 mm










Result invention vs commercial reference leader


Tool life multiplied by 3 with the invention


EXAMPLE 11

Inserts from Example 1 were tested and compared with inserts of a commercially available market reference (grade, coating, shape) for Milling-Semi Finishing and Light Roughing of Cast Iron












Test 1


















Machine:
MAZAK VTC-20C



Work piece:
DIN 0.7040



Cutting speed Vc (m/min) =
177



Milling cutter reference =
PS09/125-08-AL40-063R



Insert ref:
PDMT0905DESR-91



Tooth feed, fz (mm/tooth) =
0.28



Depth of cut Axial/Radial (mm)
1/50



Coolant:
Emulsion










Tool life criterion


Result invention vs commercial reference leader


Flank wear invention=0.1 mm


flank wear commercial ref=0.3 mm












Test 2


















Machine:
Deckel Maho



Work piece:
EN-GJS-400-18-LT



Cutting speed Vc (m/min)
200



Milling cutter diameter
Ø125



Insert ref:
SEKR1203AFEN41



Tooth feed, fz (mm/tooth)
0.25



Depth of cut Axial/Radial (mm)
1.5/100



Coolant:
Emulsion










EXAMPLE 12

Inserts from Example 1 were tested and compared with inserts of a commercially available market reference (grade, coating, shape) for Turning-Finishing of hardened Steel












Test 1


















Machine:
SOMAB Unimab 500



Work piece steel:
M2 (DIN 1.1003) Hv = 65



Cutting speed Vc (m/min)
50



Insert ref:
DNMA150604



Feed rate, (mm/rev)
0.05



Depth of cut, ap (mm)
0.25



Coolant:
Emulsion



Tool life criterion
1 part










Result invention vs commercial reference leader


flank wear invention=0.11 mm


flank wear commercial ref=0.21 mm












Test 2


















Machine:
SOMAB Unimab 500



Work piece steel:
M2 (DIN 1.1003) Hv = 65



Cutting speed Vc (m/min)
40



insert ref:
TCGT0902022M



Feed rate, (mm/rev)
0.04



Depth of cut, ap (mm)
0.5



Coolant:
Emulsion



Tool life criterion
Max flank wear = 0.1 mm










Result invention vs commercial reference leader


Tool life invention=9 min


Tool life commercial reference leader=3 min (CERMET)


EXAMPLE 13

Inserts from Example 1 were tested and compared with inserts of a commercially available market reference (grade, coating, shape) for Turning-Finishing of Cast Iron












Test 1


















Machine:
FAMAR



Work piece:
FGL200 (NFA32011)



Cutting speed Vc (m/min) =
300



insert ref:
CCMT09T30433



Feed rate, (mm/rev)
0.16



Depth of cut, ap (mm)
1 to 2



Coolant:
Emulsion










Result invention vs commercial reference leader=Tool life increased by 50%












Test 2


















Machine:
Mori Seiki



Work piece:
GL300 (EN-GJL-300)



Cutting speed Vc (m/min) =
300



Insert ref:
CNMA120412



Feed rate, (mm/rev)
0.15



Depth of cut, ap (mm)
0.5



Coolant:
Emulsion










Result invention vs commercial reference leader=Tool life increased by 30%


EXAMPLE 14

Inserts from Example 1 were tested and compared with inserts of a commercially available market reference (grade, coating, shape) for Turning-Semi finishing & Light Roughing of hardened steel












Test 1


















Machine:
GILDEMEISTER



Work piece steel:
DIN 1.7228 (55HRC)



Cutting speed Vc (m/min) =
80



Insert ref:
WNMA080408



Feed rate, (mm/rev)
0.1



Depth of cut, ap (mm)
2



Coolant:
Emulsion










Result invention vs commercial reference leader


flank wear invention=0.25 mm


flank wear commercial ref=0.5 mm












Test 2


















Machine:
Mori Seiki



Work piece steel:
DIN 1.2739 (60 HRC)



Cutting speed Vc (m/min) =
70



Insert ref:
CNGA120408



Feed rate, (mm/rev)
0.08



Depth of cut, ap (mm)
0.5



Coolant:
Emulsion










Result invention vs commercial reference leader=Tool life increased by 30%


EXAMPLE 15

Inserts from Example 1 were tested and compared with inserts of a commercially available market reference (grade, coating, shape) for Turning semi-Finishing of HRSA












Test 1


















Machine:
MORANDO 80HP



Work piece steel:
INCONEL 706



Cutting speed Vc (m/min)
65



Insert ref:
CNMG120412M2



Feed rate, (mm/rev)
0.25



Depth of cut, ap (mm)
0.3



Coolant:
Emulsion










Result invention vs commercial reference leader


tool life invention=11 min (20% better than reference leader)












Test 2


















Machine:
Bermhel TFM125M



Work piece steel:
INCONEL 718



Cutting speed Vc (m/min) =
28



Insert ref:
DCMT11T304-2M



Feed rate, (mm/rev)
0.08



Depth of cut, ap (mm)
0.5



Coolant:
Emulsion










Result invention vs commercial reference leader=increase tool life by 35%


EXAMPLE 16

Inserts from Example 1 were tested and compared with inserts of a commercially available market reference (grade, coating, shape) for Turning-Semi finishing & Light Roughing of Stainless Steel












Test 1


















Machine:
WEISSER 1485



Work piece steel:
DIN 1.4718



Cutting speed Vc (m/min)
130



insert ref:
RNMG120400-11



Feed rate, (mm/rev)
0.3



Depth of cut, ap (mm)
0.5



Coolant:
Emulsion










Result invention vs commercial reference leader


480 parts machined (valves) with invention


150 parts machined with commercial reference leader












Test 2
















Machine:
HERNAUL SOMUA


Work piece steel:
X1NiCrMoCu22-24-6 (URANUS B66)


Cutting speed Vc (m/min)
80


Insert ref:
CNMG120412M5


Feed rate, (mm/rev)
0.2


Depth of cut, ap (mm)
4


Coolant:
Emulsion









Result invention vs commercial reference leader


2 parts machined with the invention


1 part machined with the commercial reference leader












Test 3


















Machine:
SOMAB Unimab 500



Work piece steel:
316LTi (interrupted cut)



Cutting speed Vc (m/min)
70



Insert ref:
CNMG120412M2



Feed rate, (mm/rev)
0.2



Depth of cut, ap (mm)
0.25



Coolant:
Emulsion










Result invention vs commercial reference leader


tool life invention=14 min (three times better than reference leader)


EXAMPLE 17

Inserts from Example 1 were tested and compared with inserts of a commercially available market reference (grade, coating, shape) for Turning-Semi finishing & Light Roughing of Cast Iron












Test 1


















Machine:
Nakamura



Work piece:
G25 (UNI 5007)



Cutting speed Vc (m/min) =
300



insert ref:
CNMA160612



Feed rate, (mm/rev)
0.5



Depth of cut, ap (mm)
4



Coolant:
Emulsion










Result invention vs commercial reference leader=Tool life increased by 20%












Test 2


















Machine:
Diedsheim



Work piece:
FGS50 (EN-GJS 5007)



Cutting speed Vc (m/min) =
150



Insert ref:
CNMG160616-7B



Feed rate, (mm/rev)
0.5



Depth of cut, ap(mm)
3



Coolant:
Emulsion










Although the present invention has been described in connection with preferred embodiments thereof, it will be appreciated by those skilled in the art that additions, deletions, modifications, and substitutions not specifically described may be made without department from the spirit and scope of the invention as defined in the appended claims.

Claims
  • 1. Cemented carbide cutting tool insert comprising a substrate and a wear resistant coating wherein: the substrate comprises WC, from about 5.5 to about 8.5 wt-% Co and Cr such that the Cr/Co weight ratio is from about 0.08 to about 0.12, and also Ti and Ta in such amounts that the ratio of Me/Co=(at % Ti+at % Ta)/at % Co is less than or equal to about 0.014−(CW—Cr)*0.008 and higher than about 0.0005 and CW—Cr is from about 0.75 to about 0.95, whereby the CW—Cr is defined as CW—Cr=(magnetic-% Co+1.13*wt-% Cr)/wt-% Cowhere magnetic-% Co is the weight percentage of magnetic Co and wt-% Co is the weight percentage of Co in the cemented carbide, the coercivity is more than about 20 kA/m, andthe wear resistant coating is a homogeneous AlxTi1−xN-layer where x equals from about 0.6 to about 0.67, with thickness of more than about 1 μm, but less than about 3.8 μm, both composition and thickness being measured on the flank face about 0.2 mm below the nose radius and in the center of the cutting edge.
  • 2. The cemented carbide cutting tool insert of claim 1 wherein the substrate comprises from about 6 to about 8 wt-% Co, the Cr/Co weight ratio is from about 0.09 to about 0.11, the ratio of Me/Co is higher than about 0.0007, CW—Cr is from about 0.78 to about 0.93 and the coercivity is from about 23 to about 29 kA/m.
  • 3. The cemented carbide cutting tool insert of claim 1 wherein in said coating, x is about 0.62 and the coating thickness is greater than about 1.0 μm but less than about 3.0 μm.
Priority Claims (2)
Number Date Country Kind
0701320 Jun 2007 SE national
0800367 Feb 2008 SE national
US Referenced Citations (22)
Number Name Date Kind
5679448 Kawata Oct 1997 A
5761593 Ostlund et al. Jun 1998 A
6103357 Selinder et al. Aug 2000 A
6214287 Waldenström Apr 2001 B1
6250855 Persson et al. Jun 2001 B1
6261673 Reineck et al. Jul 2001 B1
6273930 Waldenstrom Aug 2001 B1
6309738 Sakurai Oct 2001 B1
6342291 Jonsson et al. Jan 2002 B1
6413293 Grearson et al. Jul 2002 B1
6575671 North et al. Jun 2003 B1
6612787 North et al. Sep 2003 B1
6884499 Penich et al. Apr 2005 B2
7179319 Heinrich et al. Feb 2007 B2
7727621 Nordlof et al. Jun 2010 B2
20020051887 Jonsson et al. May 2002 A1
20050072269 Banerjee Apr 2005 A1
20060029511 Gustafson et al. Feb 2006 A1
20060286410 Ahlgren et al. Dec 2006 A1
20070154739 Martensson et al. Jul 2007 A1
20070292671 Akesson et al. Dec 2007 A1
20080276544 Hirose et al. Nov 2008 A1
Foreign Referenced Citations (37)
Number Date Country
101 35 790 Jul 2005 DE
0 773 080 Oct 1996 EP
1 038 989 Sep 2000 EP
1 347 076 Sep 2003 EP
1 470 879 Oct 2004 EP
1 526 189 Apr 2005 EP
1 749 601 Jun 2006 EP
1 676 939 Jul 2006 EP
1 043 413 Sep 2006 EP
1 795 628 Jun 2007 EP
1 798 308 Jun 2007 EP
1 798 310 Jun 2007 EP
1 803 830 Jul 2007 EP
1 500 713 Aug 2007 EP
1 900 849 Mar 2008 EP
1 593 326 Jul 1981 GB
7-97679 Apr 1995 JP
8-209333 Aug 1996 JP
10-324942 Aug 1998 JP
10-324943 Aug 1998 JP
11-12718 Jan 1999 JP
11152535 Jun 1999 JP
2000-23320 Aug 2000 JP
2001-329360 Nov 2001 JP
2003193171 (A) Jul 2003 JP
2004-315904 Nov 2004 JP
2004-315904 Nov 2004 JP
2006-117974 May 2006 JP
2007-44807 Feb 2007 JP
2008-1918 Jan 2008 JP
2009-61579 Mar 2009 JP
2009-66747 Apr 2009 JP
WO 9720082 Jun 1997 WO
WO 9913120 Mar 1999 WO
WO 2006041366 Apr 2006 WO
WO 2006043421 Apr 2006 WO
WO 2006080888 Aug 2006 WO
Non-Patent Literature Citations (21)
Entry
Hsieh et al “Deposition and characterization of TiAIN and multilayered TiN/TiAIN coatings using unbalanced magnetron sputtering” Surface & Coatings Technology 108-109 (1998) p. 132-137.
Anderson et al “Deposition, microstructure and mechanical and tribological properties of magnetron sputtered TiN/TiAIN multilayers” Surface & Coatings Technology 123 (2000) p. 219-226.
European Search Report dated Nov. 12, 2008 issued in European Application No. 08157076.4.
Office Action mailed Sep. 3, 2010, in U.S. Appl. No. 12/129,963.
Office Action mailed Aug. 13, 2010, in U.S. Appl. No. 12/147,587.
Office Action mailed Aug. 13, 2010, in U.S. Appl. No. 12/126,195.
European Search Report dated Nov. 13, 2008, issued in EP 08 10 4014.
European Search Report dated Nov. 11, 2008, issued in EP 08 15 6044.
European Search Report dated Nov. 12, 2008, issued in EP 08 15 7076.
European Search Report dated Nov. 12, 2008, issued in EP 08 15 6057.
International Search Report dated Oct. 3, 2008, issued in PCT/SE2008/050777.
Swedish Office Action mailed Jul. 12, 2007, issued in 0701449-1.
S. Liu, “Magnetic Property of Binder in WC-Co Cemented Carbides”, Transactions of NFsoc, vol. 2, No. 3, (Aug. 1992), pp. 83-86.
B. Roebuck, “Magnetic Moment (Saturation) Measurements on Hardmetals”, Int. J. of Refractory Metals & Hard Materials 14(1996), 419-424.
Notice of Opposition against EP 2 011 890, dated Jul. 13, 2011.
Notice of Opposition against EP 2006413, dated Jul. 18, 2011.
Kolaska, Hans, “Pulvermetallurgie der Hartmetalle”, Hagen: Fachverband Pulvermetallurgie, 1992.
Letter from Opponent in Opposition against EP2006413, dated Jul. 16, 2012.
Letter from Opponent in Opposition against EP2011890, dated Mar. 13, 2012.
Reply from Proprietor in Opposition against EP2006413, dated Feb. 28, 2012.
Reply from Proprietor in Opposition against EP2011890, dated Feb. 20, 2012.
Related Publications (1)
Number Date Country
20080295658 A1 Dec 2008 US