This application claims priority to Swedish Patent Application No. 0701320-4 filed Jun. 1, 2007 and Swedish Patent Application No. 0800367-5 filed Feb. 18, 2008, which is incorporated by reference herein.
The present invention relates to a coated cemented carbide cutting tool insert. More specifically the invention relates to PVD coated cemented carbide cutting tool inserts for semifinishing or finishing metal cutting operations.
High performance cutting tools must possess high wear resistance, high toughness properties and good resistance to plastic deformation. This is particularly valid when the cutting operation is carried out at high cutting speeds and/or at high feed rates when large amount of heat is generated.
Cemented carbide grades for metal machining applications generally contain WC, γ-phase, which is a solid solution of generally TiC, NbC, TaC and WC, and a binder phase, generally Co and/or Ni. WC—Co cemented carbides having a fine grain size less than about 1 μm are produced through the incorporation of grain growth inhibitors such as V, Cr, Ti, Ta and combinations thereof in the initial powder blend. Typical inhibitor additions are from about 0.5 to about 5 wt-% of the binder phase.
It is an object of the present invention to provide inserts with a coated cemented carbide with improved wear resistance without sacrificing toughness and edge security, particularly useful for semifinishing or finishing operations of metal materials.
This object is solved by providing a cemented carbide insert of a WC+Co— substrate with fine grain size provided with a PVD coating.
In one aspect of the present invention, there is provided a cemented carbide cutting tool insert comprising a substrate and a wear resistant coating wherein the substrate comprises WC, from about 5.5 to about 8.5 wt-% Co and Cr such that the Cr/Co weight ratio is from about 0.08 to about 0.12, and also Ti and Ta in such amounts that the ratio of Me/Co=(at % Ti+at % Ta)/at % Co is less than or equal to about 0.014−(CW—Cr)*0.008 and higher than about 0.0005 and CW—Cr is from about 0.75 to about 0.95, whereby the CW—Cr is defined as CW—Cr=(magnetic-% Co+1.13*wt-% Cr)/wt-% Co where magnetic-% Co is the weight percentage of magnetic Co and wt-% Co is the weight percentage of Co in the cemented carbide, the coercivity is more than about 20 kA/m, and the wear resistant coating is a homogeneous AlxTi1−xN-layer where x equals from about 0.6 to about 0.67, with thickness of more than about 1 μm, but less than about 3.8 μm, both composition and thickness being measured on the flank face about 0.2 mm below the nose radius and in the center of the cutting edge.
In another aspect of the present invention, there is provided a method of making a cemented carbide cutting tool insert comprising a substrate and a wear resistant coating comprising the following steps: providing a substrate comprising WC, from about 5.5 to about 8.5, wt-% Co and Cr such that the Cr/Co weight ratio is 0.08-0.12 and also Ti and Ta in such amounts that the ratio of Me/Co=(at % Ti+at % Ta)/at % Co is less than or equal to about 0.014−(CW—Cr)*0.008 and higher than about 0.0005 and the CW—Cr is from about 0.75 to about 0.95, where the CW—Cr is defined as CW—Cr=(magnetic-% Co+1.13*wt-% Cr)/wt-% Co where magnetic-% Co is the weight percentage of magnetic Co and wt-% Co is the weight percentage of Co in the cemented carbide and the coercivity is more than about 20 kA/m by: wet milling submicron powders of tungsten carbide, cobalt, Ti and Ta added as TiC, TaC, (Ti,W)C, (Ta,W)C or (Ti,Ta,W)C and at least one of Cr3C2, Cr23C6 and Cr7C3 to obtain a slurry, drying the slurry to obtain a powder, pressing the powder to inserts, sintering the inserts in vacuum, possibly performing an isostatic gas pressure step during sintering temperature or at the final stage of sintering, possibly grinding the inserts to requested shapes, depositing by arc evaporation technique whilst maintaining a partial pressure of nitrogen in the recipient and using the appropriate selection of active evaporation sources and rates, a wear resistant coating comprising a homogeneous AlxTi1−xN-layer with x equals from about 0.6 to about 0.67, and a thickness of the layer of more than about 1 μm, but less than about 3.8 μm, the composition and the thickness being measured on the flank face about 0.2 mm below the nose radius and in the center of the cutting edge.
Still further aspects of the invention relate to the uses of the cemented carbide cutting tool insert described above in certain milling and turning operations.
According to the present invention, there is provided coated cemented carbide shaped inserts for semifinishing or finishing machining of metals, comprising a cemented carbide substrate, a wear resistant coating, and different insert geometries. The substrate comprises in addition to WC from about 5.5 to about 8.5, preferably from about 6 to about 8, wt-% Co and Cr such that the Cr/Co weight ratio is from about 0.08 to about 0. 12, preferably from about 0.09 to about 0.11. The substrate also contains Ti and Ta in such amounts that the ratio
Me/Co=(at % Ti+at % Ta)/at % Co
is less than or equal to about 0.014−(CW—Cr)*0.008 and higher than 0.0005, preferably higher than about 0.0007 and the CW—Cr ratio is from about 0.75 to about 0.95, preferably from about 0.78 to about 0.93, where
CW—Cr=(magnetic-% Co+1.13*wt-% Cr)/wt-% Co
where magnetic-% Co is the weight percentage of magnetic Co and wt-% Co is the weight percentage of Co in the cemented carbide. The CW—Cr ratio is a function of the W content in the Co binder phase. A CW—Cr of about 1 corresponds to a low W-content in the binder phase and a CW—Cr of from about 0.75 to about 0.8 corresponds to a high W-content in the binder phase.
The coercivity is more than about 20 kA/m, preferably from about 23 to about 29 kA/m.
The sintered body may also contain small amounts of precipitations of additional phase or phases such as eta-phase, MX or M7X3, M3X2 where M=(Ti+Ta+Co+Cr+W) and X═C or N allowed to a maximum of 5.0 vol % without detrimental effects.
The wear resistant coating comprises a homogeneous AlxTi1−xN-layer with x equals from about 0.6 to about 0.67, preferably x equals about 0.62. The thickness of the layer is more than about 1 μm, preferably more than about 1.8 μm but less than about 3.8 μm, preferably less than about 3.0 μm. Both the composition and the thickness are measured on the flank face of the insert from about 0.2 mm below the nose radius and in the center of the cutting edge.
The present invention also relates to a method of making cemented carbide cutting tool inserts for semifinishing or finishing operations in milling applications, comprising the following steps:
providing a cemented carbide substrate with a composition according to above by:
A first embodiment the present invention relates to the use of inserts according to above for die and mold semifinishing and finishing operations in milling applications of work pieces with a hardness of from about 30 to about 65 HRC.
A second embodiment the present invention relates to the use of inserts according to above for machining of heat resistant super alloys (HRSA), as Inconel 718, Inconel 625, Waspaloy or Udimet 720,
A third embodiment the present invention relates to the use of inserts according to above for machining of stainless steel, such as AISI/SAE 304, San-Mac 316L, SAF2205 or SAF2507,
A fourth embodiment the present invention relates to the use of inserts according to above for milling of tool steel at a cutting speed from about 70 up to about 120 m/min, a feed from about 0.1 to about 0.35 mm/tooth and depth of cut from about 1 to about 3 mm.
A fifth embodiment the present invention relates to the use of inserts according to above for turning of hardened steel, at a cutting speed from about 40 up to about 60 m/min and a feed from about 0.03 to about 0.05 mm/rev and depth of cut from about 0.2 to about 0.5 mm.
A sixth embodiment the present invention relates to the use of inserts according to above for milling of hard cast steel, at a cutting speed from about 50 up to about 100 m/min and a feed from about 0.1 to about 0.3 mm/tooth and depth of cut from about 0.50 to about 1.5 mm.
A seventh embodiment the present invention relates to the use of inserts according to above for machining of cast iron,
The invention is additionally illustrated in connection with the following examples, which are to be considered as illustrative of the present invention. It should be understood, however, that the invention is not limited to the specific details of the examples.
Tungsten carbide powder, 7 wt % very fine grained cobalt powder and 0.7 wt-% Cr added as H. C. Starck fine grained Cr3C2-powder, 0.014 wt-% Ti and 0.010 wt-% Ta, added as TiC and TaC, were wet milled together with conventional pressing agents. After milling and spray drying, the powder was pressed to shape blanks for inserts and sintered at 1410° C. The sintered material had a coercivity of 27 kA/m corresponding to a WC grain size of about 0.8-0.9 μm. Substrate data are summarized in the table below.
The so obtained cemented carbide inserts were ground to obtain the finished shapes.
The as-ground inserts were wet cleaned. A homogeneous (Ti,Al)N layer was deposited by cathodic arc evaporation using a target material consisting of a Ti0.33Al0.67 alloy in an N2 gas atmosphere. The thickness of the layer was 2.5 μm and was a homogeneous layer with the composition Al0.62Ti0.38N as determined by EDS-analysis.
Inserts from Example 1 were tested and compared with inserts of a commercially available market reference (grade, coating, shape) for the intended application area. Wear resistance test was done.
The test represents the upper range in terms of work piece hardness.
Type of Test
A die and mold application, a straight shaped mold with the cutter body in the orthogonal milling position.
There is a significant improvement in comparison to the commercial reference which is optimised for this range of work piece hardness. This clearly expresses the superior wear resistance of the invented tool. The commercial tool failed to meet the demanded tool life, whereas the invented tool had a superior tool life with better cutting edge integrity.
Inserts from Example 1 were tested and compared with inserts of a commercially available reference (grade, coating, shape) for the intended application area. This is a toughness demanding test in die and mold application before tempering the material. The machining situation was a very typical application. It represents, in terms of work piece hardness, the lower end of the application area in die and mold applications.
Type of Test
Semifinishing a cavity, with the cutter body orthogonally oriented to the bottom surface of the mold
The improvement compared to the commercial reference, which is fully designed for semi-finishing machining in this application, shows the excellent comportment of the invented tool.
Inserts from Example 1 were tested and compared with inserts of a commercially available market reference (grade, coating, shape) for Milling-Finishing of heat resistant super alloys (HRSA).
Result invention vs commercial reference leader
flank wear invention=0.04 mm
flank wear commercial ref=0.4 mm
Result invention vs commercial reference leader
flank wear invention=0.05 mm (cutting time 11 min)
flank wear commercial ref=0.35 mm (cutting time 11 min)
Inserts from Example 1 were tested and compared with inserts of a commercially available market reference (grade, coating, shape) for Milling-Finishing of Stainless Steel
Tool life criterion cutting time 12 min
Result invention vs commercial reference leader
Flank wear invention=0.04 mm
flank wear commercial ref=0.1 mm
Result invention vs commercial reference leader
flank wear invention=0.05 mm (cutting time 12 min)
flank wear commercial ref=0.8 mm (cutting time 4 min)
Inserts from Example 1 were tested and compared with inserts of a commercially available market reference (grade, coating, shape) for Milling-Finishing of Cast Iron
Coolant: Emulsion
Result invention vs commercial reference leader=Increase in tool life by 30%
Inserts from Example 1 were tested and compared with inserts of a commercially available market reference (grade, coating, shape) for Milling-Finishing of hard cast steel
Result invention vs commercial reference leader
improvement of 20% in tool life
Result invention vs commercial reference leader
flank wear invention=0.2 mm
flank wear commercial ref=0.35 mm
Inserts from Example 1 were tested and compared with inserts of a commercially available market reference (grade, coating, shape) for Milling Semi Finishing & Light Roughing of tool steel
Result invention vs commercial reference leader
improvement of 30% in tool life
Result invention vs commercial reference leader
flank wear invention=0.1 mm (9 parts machined)
flank wear commercial ref=0.4 mm (1 part machined)
Inserts from Example 1 were tested and compared with inserts of a commercially available market reference (grade, coating, shape) for Milling-SemiFinishing & Light Roughing of HRSA
Result invention vs commercial reference leader
flank wear invention=0.06 mm
flank wear commercial ref=0.3 mm
Result invention vs commercial reference leader
cutting speed increased by 50%
Inserts from Example 1 were tested and compared with inserts of a commercially available market reference (grade, coating, shape) for Milling-Semi Finishing and Light Roughing of Stainless Steel
Result invention vs commercial reference leader
flank wear invention=0.08 mm
flank wear commercial ref=0.12 mm
Result invention vs commercial reference leader
Tool life multiplied by 3 with the invention
Inserts from Example 1 were tested and compared with inserts of a commercially available market reference (grade, coating, shape) for Milling-Semi Finishing and Light Roughing of Cast Iron
Tool life criterion
Result invention vs commercial reference leader
Flank wear invention=0.1 mm
flank wear commercial ref=0.3 mm
Inserts from Example 1 were tested and compared with inserts of a commercially available market reference (grade, coating, shape) for Turning-Finishing of hardened Steel
Result invention vs commercial reference leader
flank wear invention=0.11 mm
flank wear commercial ref=0.21 mm
Result invention vs commercial reference leader
Tool life invention=9 min
Tool life commercial reference leader=3 min (CERMET)
Inserts from Example 1 were tested and compared with inserts of a commercially available market reference (grade, coating, shape) for Turning-Finishing of Cast Iron
Result invention vs commercial reference leader=Tool life increased by 50%
Result invention vs commercial reference leader=Tool life increased by 30%
Inserts from Example 1 were tested and compared with inserts of a commercially available market reference (grade, coating, shape) for Turning-Semi finishing & Light Roughing of hardened steel
Result invention vs commercial reference leader
flank wear invention=0.25 mm
flank wear commercial ref=0.5 mm
Result invention vs commercial reference leader=Tool life increased by 30%
Inserts from Example 1 were tested and compared with inserts of a commercially available market reference (grade, coating, shape) for Turning semi-Finishing of HRSA
Result invention vs commercial reference leader
tool life invention=11 min (20% better than reference leader)
Result invention vs commercial reference leader=increase tool life by 35%
Inserts from Example 1 were tested and compared with inserts of a commercially available market reference (grade, coating, shape) for Turning-Semi finishing & Light Roughing of Stainless Steel
Result invention vs commercial reference leader
480 parts machined (valves) with invention
150 parts machined with commercial reference leader
Result invention vs commercial reference leader
2 parts machined with the invention
1 part machined with the commercial reference leader
Result invention vs commercial reference leader
tool life invention=14 min (three times better than reference leader)
Inserts from Example 1 were tested and compared with inserts of a commercially available market reference (grade, coating, shape) for Turning-Semi finishing & Light Roughing of Cast Iron
Result invention vs commercial reference leader=Tool life increased by 20%
Although the present invention has been described in connection with preferred embodiments thereof, it will be appreciated by those skilled in the art that additions, deletions, modifications, and substitutions not specifically described may be made without department from the spirit and scope of the invention as defined in the appended claims.
Number | Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
0701320 | Jun 2007 | SE | national |
0800367 | Feb 2008 | SE | national |
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
5679448 | Kawata | Oct 1997 | A |
5761593 | Ostlund et al. | Jun 1998 | A |
6103357 | Selinder et al. | Aug 2000 | A |
6214287 | Waldenström | Apr 2001 | B1 |
6250855 | Persson et al. | Jun 2001 | B1 |
6261673 | Reineck et al. | Jul 2001 | B1 |
6273930 | Waldenstrom | Aug 2001 | B1 |
6309738 | Sakurai | Oct 2001 | B1 |
6342291 | Jonsson et al. | Jan 2002 | B1 |
6413293 | Grearson et al. | Jul 2002 | B1 |
6575671 | North et al. | Jun 2003 | B1 |
6612787 | North et al. | Sep 2003 | B1 |
6884499 | Penich et al. | Apr 2005 | B2 |
7179319 | Heinrich et al. | Feb 2007 | B2 |
7727621 | Nordlof et al. | Jun 2010 | B2 |
20020051887 | Jonsson et al. | May 2002 | A1 |
20050072269 | Banerjee | Apr 2005 | A1 |
20060029511 | Gustafson et al. | Feb 2006 | A1 |
20060286410 | Ahlgren et al. | Dec 2006 | A1 |
20070154739 | Martensson et al. | Jul 2007 | A1 |
20070292671 | Akesson et al. | Dec 2007 | A1 |
20080276544 | Hirose et al. | Nov 2008 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
101 35 790 | Jul 2005 | DE |
0 773 080 | Oct 1996 | EP |
1 038 989 | Sep 2000 | EP |
1 347 076 | Sep 2003 | EP |
1 470 879 | Oct 2004 | EP |
1 526 189 | Apr 2005 | EP |
1 749 601 | Jun 2006 | EP |
1 676 939 | Jul 2006 | EP |
1 043 413 | Sep 2006 | EP |
1 795 628 | Jun 2007 | EP |
1 798 308 | Jun 2007 | EP |
1 798 310 | Jun 2007 | EP |
1 803 830 | Jul 2007 | EP |
1 500 713 | Aug 2007 | EP |
1 900 849 | Mar 2008 | EP |
1 593 326 | Jul 1981 | GB |
7-97679 | Apr 1995 | JP |
8-209333 | Aug 1996 | JP |
10-324942 | Aug 1998 | JP |
10-324943 | Aug 1998 | JP |
11-12718 | Jan 1999 | JP |
11152535 | Jun 1999 | JP |
2000-23320 | Aug 2000 | JP |
2001-329360 | Nov 2001 | JP |
2003193171 (A) | Jul 2003 | JP |
2004-315904 | Nov 2004 | JP |
2004-315904 | Nov 2004 | JP |
2006-117974 | May 2006 | JP |
2007-44807 | Feb 2007 | JP |
2008-1918 | Jan 2008 | JP |
2009-61579 | Mar 2009 | JP |
2009-66747 | Apr 2009 | JP |
WO 9720082 | Jun 1997 | WO |
WO 9913120 | Mar 1999 | WO |
WO 2006041366 | Apr 2006 | WO |
WO 2006043421 | Apr 2006 | WO |
WO 2006080888 | Aug 2006 | WO |
Entry |
---|
Hsieh et al “Deposition and characterization of TiAIN and multilayered TiN/TiAIN coatings using unbalanced magnetron sputtering” Surface & Coatings Technology 108-109 (1998) p. 132-137. |
Anderson et al “Deposition, microstructure and mechanical and tribological properties of magnetron sputtered TiN/TiAIN multilayers” Surface & Coatings Technology 123 (2000) p. 219-226. |
European Search Report dated Nov. 12, 2008 issued in European Application No. 08157076.4. |
Office Action mailed Sep. 3, 2010, in U.S. Appl. No. 12/129,963. |
Office Action mailed Aug. 13, 2010, in U.S. Appl. No. 12/147,587. |
Office Action mailed Aug. 13, 2010, in U.S. Appl. No. 12/126,195. |
European Search Report dated Nov. 13, 2008, issued in EP 08 10 4014. |
European Search Report dated Nov. 11, 2008, issued in EP 08 15 6044. |
European Search Report dated Nov. 12, 2008, issued in EP 08 15 7076. |
European Search Report dated Nov. 12, 2008, issued in EP 08 15 6057. |
International Search Report dated Oct. 3, 2008, issued in PCT/SE2008/050777. |
Swedish Office Action mailed Jul. 12, 2007, issued in 0701449-1. |
S. Liu, “Magnetic Property of Binder in WC-Co Cemented Carbides”, Transactions of NFsoc, vol. 2, No. 3, (Aug. 1992), pp. 83-86. |
B. Roebuck, “Magnetic Moment (Saturation) Measurements on Hardmetals”, Int. J. of Refractory Metals & Hard Materials 14(1996), 419-424. |
Notice of Opposition against EP 2 011 890, dated Jul. 13, 2011. |
Notice of Opposition against EP 2006413, dated Jul. 18, 2011. |
Kolaska, Hans, “Pulvermetallurgie der Hartmetalle”, Hagen: Fachverband Pulvermetallurgie, 1992. |
Letter from Opponent in Opposition against EP2006413, dated Jul. 16, 2012. |
Letter from Opponent in Opposition against EP2011890, dated Mar. 13, 2012. |
Reply from Proprietor in Opposition against EP2006413, dated Feb. 28, 2012. |
Reply from Proprietor in Opposition against EP2011890, dated Feb. 20, 2012. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20080295658 A1 | Dec 2008 | US |