Patent Grant
6887570
This invention relates generally to absorbent materials, and more specifically to, various litter compositions used for the control and removal of animal waste.
Known litter compositions are fabricated primarily from one of four materials: clay; vegetable matter such as grass, hay or alfalfa; wood chips, shavings or sawdust; and paper, such as shredded, flaked or pelletized paper. Known clay litters are prone to produce dust, and tracking out by the animal. Further, production of such clay litters results in a large quantity of dust being produced, sometimes referred to as clay fines. Clay fines present a problem to the litter manufacturers since the fines are a waste product and require disposal. In addition such clay products are not biodegradable.
Sodium bentonite clay is one known material used in the production of litters and is known for its excellent absorption and clumping qualities, as well as for odor retention. However, sodium bentonite is relatively expensive compared to other litter components. Therefore, attempts have been made to reduce the amount of sodium bentonite in clumping litters, for example, mixing pellets of non-absorbing clays with pellets of sodium bentonite clay in varying ratios. However, in these known litters, the properties which are most desirable in the sodium bentonite have been underutilized as most of the clumping and binding qualities of sodium bentonite occur at or near the surface of the clay.
In one aspect, an animal litter is disclosed which comprises non-swelling particles and a swelling agent coated on the non-swelling particles.
In another aspect, an absorbent material is disclosed which comprises clay particles in a size range of −10 to +50 mesh and a coating for the particles which comprises a bentonite powder.
In still another aspect, a clumping animal litter is disclosed which comprises clay particles in a size range of about −10 to +50 mesh which are agglomerated from clay fines of about −50 mesh size. A coating surrounds the particles.
In a further aspect, a method for manufacturing a clumping animal litter is disclosed which comprises agglomerating clay fines into particles and coating the particles with a powder.
In yet another aspect, a clumping animal litter is disclosed which comprises clay particles in a size range of about −10 to +50 mesh in size and bentonite powder of about 200 mesh size. The powder is applied as a coating to the particles in an amount of about 20% to about 40% by weight.
Referring to
In an exemplary embodiment, the clay fines are agglomerated using a pin mixer. A powder 14 is applied to particles 12 to form a coating. Powder 14 is the active ingredient of the litter. Exemplary coating powders include at least one of a sodium bentonite powder and a bentonite/guar gum blended powder. However, the powder coatings may be augmented with either or both of an odor control agent and an anti-microbial agent. Particle 10 is spherical in shape, the shape shown is by way of example only as it is contemplated that a host of shapes and sizes of coated particles can be produced by the embodiments and processes described herein.
One specific embodiment includes recovery of waste fines which include Calcium-Montmorillonite. The Calcium-Montmorillonite fines are agglomerated in a pin mixer using water as a binder. The agglomerated fines have a moisture content of about 20% to about 40%. In another embodiment, the fines have a moisture content of about 28% to about 34%. The agglomerated fines are then coated with a bentonite powder of about 200 mesh using a centrifugal coater or a rotary coater/dryer system.
In one embodiment, the clay fines are fed into a pin mixer using a screw extruder. Moisture (water) is added to the fines to act as a binder, in one embodiment about 28%, while in the extruder. The fines and the moisture result in a cake like substance as it enters the pin mixer. A pin mixer includes a shaft with a series of pins which breaks up the cake and results in the formation of small, spherically shaped particles which are separated from the cake-like batch using shaker screens. As previously described, in one embodiment, the clay fines are about −50 mesh in size and after addition of the moisture and the pin mixing process, resulting in particles 12 of between about −10 mesh and +50 mesh in size. Other methods are contemplated which include using binders of guar gum and water or starch and water.
Another embodiment utilizes a blend of clay fines and bentonite fines with water as a binder to produce particles 12 through the pin mixing process. Still another embodiment utilizes sodium bentonite fines with water as a binder to produce particles 12 of between about −10 mesh and +50 mesh in size through the pin mixing process. The agglomerated fines, including the clay and bentonite embodiment, or the bentonite embodiment, are then coated with a bentonite powder of about 200 mesh using a centrifugal coater or a rotary coater/dryer system for improved clumping capability.
In alternative embodiments, methods for coating an outer surface of clay particles 12 with powder 14 include utilization of at least one of a fluidized bed dryer, a semi-continuous centrifugal coater or a rotary coating and drying system. In the rotary system, clay particles 12 and powder 14 are tumbled in a drum to mix for about 60 seconds. The litter is then removed from the drum and the drum is heated to about 300° to about 400° Farenheit and the litter is returned to the drum and dried until about an 8% moisture content is obtained.
The resulting coated litter is typically in the −10 to +50 mesh size range, with a moisture content from about 15% to about 5%, preferably with a moisture content of about 8%. In one embodiment, the bentonite coating is about 20% to about 40% by weight of a coated particle. In an alternative embodiment, the bentonite coating is about 25% to about 35% by weight of a coated particle. In a further alternative embodiment, the bentonite coating is about 30% by weight of a coated particle.
In alternative method for producing the litter, the agglomerated fines are placed in a fluidized bed and bentonite coating is sprayed in a low concentration solution.
The litter resulting from the compositions and methods described above has superior clumping properties as the active clumping agent is kept on the surface of the particles, where the clumping bonds are formed. In addition, the litter has a dust content which is lower than known clumping litters, resulting in less tracking, as the coating processes described above result in a shell being formed around the agglomerated particles. Further, the litter is easier to remove from litter boxes than known clumping litters as the litter described herein is less likely to attach to litter boxes.
In the above described embodiments, coating with bentonite provides a litter which includes the clumping and absorption qualities of a litter which is composed solely of sodium bentonite. However, due to the coating process, the amount by weight of sodium bentonite is reduced over known clumping litters, resulting in more efficient use of the sodium bentonite while providing a production cost savings over those litters with higher percentage amounts of sodium bentonite. In addition, the coated litter produced provides a lighter weight product and has a unique, homogeneous appearance that appeals to consumers. Further, the agglomeration process results in a utilization of clay product fines, which heretofore have been considered waste products, and since clay is not biodegradable, clay fines have traditionally required space for disposal.
While the invention has been described in terms of various specific embodiments, those skilled in the art will recognize that the invention can be practiced with modification within the spirit and scope of the claims.
| Number | Name | Date | Kind |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2531427 | Hauser | Nov 1950 | A |
| 3586478 | Neumann | Jun 1971 | A |
| 3789797 | Brewer | Feb 1974 | A |
| 4036928 | Valenta | Jul 1977 | A |
| 4085704 | Frazier | Apr 1978 | A |
| 4157696 | Carlberg | Jun 1979 | A |
| 4163674 | Been | Aug 1979 | A |
| 4187803 | Valenta | Feb 1980 | A |
| 4278047 | Luca | Jul 1981 | A |
| 4407231 | Colborn et al. | Oct 1983 | A |
| 4459368 | Jaffee et al. | Jul 1984 | A |
| 4622920 | Goss | Nov 1986 | A |
| 4641605 | Gordon | Feb 1987 | A |
| 4689297 | Good et al. | Aug 1987 | A |
| 4976977 | Johnson et al. | Dec 1990 | A |
| 5094189 | Aylen et al. | Mar 1992 | A |
| 5101771 | Goss | Apr 1992 | A |
| RE33983 | Hughes | Jul 1992 | E |
| 5129365 | Hughes | Jul 1992 | A |
| 5146877 | Jaffee et al. | Sep 1992 | A |
| 5176107 | Buschur | Jan 1993 | A |
| 5188064 | House | Feb 1993 | A |
| 5193489 | Hardin | Mar 1993 | A |
| 5196473 | Valenta et al. | Mar 1993 | A |
| 5303676 | Lawson | Apr 1994 | A |
| 5317990 | Hughes | Jun 1994 | A |
| 5339769 | Toth et al. | Aug 1994 | A |
| 5359961 | Goss et al. | Nov 1994 | A |
| 5386803 | Hughes | Feb 1995 | A |
| 5421291 | Lawson et al. | Jun 1995 | A |
| 5452684 | Elazier-Davis et al. | Sep 1995 | A |
| 5469809 | Coleman | Nov 1995 | A |
| 5503111 | Hughes | Apr 1996 | A |
| 5542374 | Palmer, Jr. | Aug 1996 | A |
| 5577463 | Elazier-Davis et al. | Nov 1996 | A |
| 5664523 | Ochi et al. | Sep 1997 | A |
| 5735232 | Lang et al. | Apr 1998 | A |
| 5762023 | Carter | Jun 1998 | A |
| 5806462 | Parr | Sep 1998 | A |
| 5824226 | Boyd et al. | Oct 1998 | A |
| 5836263 | Goss et al. | Nov 1998 | A |
| 5901661 | Pattengill et al. | May 1999 | A |
| 5960743 | Taylor | Oct 1999 | A |
| 5975019 | Goss et al. | Nov 1999 | A |
| 5992351 | Jenkins | Nov 1999 | A |
| 6020282 | Taylor et al. | Feb 2000 | A |
| 6039004 | Goss et al. | Mar 2000 | A |
| 6089189 | Goss et al. | Jul 2000 | A |
| 6089190 | Jaffee et al. | Jul 2000 | A |
| 6210625 | Matsushita et al. | Apr 2001 | B1 |
| Number | Date | Country | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 20030148100 A1 | Aug 2003 | US |
