The present invention relates to a continuous, chemical vapor deposition (CVD) method for producing a coated glass article, particularly coated architectural glass, and to the coated article so produced. Specifically, the invention relates to an improved method for producing a glass article coated with a layer of iron oxide (FexOy) and the coated glass article formed thereby.
Known processes for producing coated glass articles can yield coated glass articles with varying properties. One of the properties controllable through selection of coatings is the apparent color of the coated article. One aesthetically pleasing color for glass articles, particularly for glass used as architectural glass, is glass with a gold appearance. Therefore, an object of the present invention is to provide a coated glass article with an aesthetically pleasing gold appearance.
A method is defined for producing an iron oxide coating on a glass article. The article is preferably for use as an architectural glazing. The method includes providing a heated glass substrate having a surface on which the coating is to be deposited. Ferrocene and an oxidant are directed toward and along the surface to be coated, and the ferrocene and the oxidant are reacted at or near the surface of the glass substrate to form an iron oxide coating.
In accordance with the present invention, there is provided a method for the deposition of an iron oxide layer on a substrate, particularly a glass substrate. An iron oxide layer, as defined herein, is a coating containing primarily iron oxide, with the iron typically present in varying valences, and possibly containing trace contaminants, for example carbon. Specifically, the invention relates to the atmospheric pressure chemical vapor deposition of an iron oxide layer from a combination of: ferrocene and an oxidant. Preferably, an inert carrier gas is combined with the ferrocene and the oxidant. Additionally, within the scope of the present invention, it is also possible that a solvent can be used in conjunction with the other precursors. The preferred oxidant for use in the present invention is elemental oxygen gas.
It has been found, in conjunction with the method of the present invention, that the use of ferrocene allows the deposition of an iron oxide layer with significant control over the valence of the iron deposited. Control of the valence of the product layer is significant in terms of properties of the layer, including, but not limited to the color of the layer. Additionally, the use of ferrocene in conjunction with the present invention results in increased deposition rates allowing for the deposition of thicker iron oxide coatings, again resulting in control of the properties of the resultant coated glass article.
The iron oxide coating can be used alone or in combination with additional coatings applied to the substrate. Preferably, the invention can be used in conjunction with additional layers to produce solar control, low emissivity products, with an aesthetically pleasing gold color for architectural glazing applications. Most preferably, the deposited iron oxide layer is primarily, in the form Fe2O3.
The method of the present invention is preferably carried out in an on-line, float glass production process, which is well known in the art. An example of such a process can be found in U.S. Pat. No. 5,798,142, which is hereby incorporated by reference as if set forth in its entirety herein.
In a preferred embodiment of the present invention, a heated glass substrate is provided, the substrate having a surface on which the coating is to be deposited. Ferrocene, an oxidant and preferably an inert carrier gas are directed toward and along the surface to be coated. The mixture is reacted at or near the surface of the glass substrate to form the iron oxide coating. Subsequently, the coated glass substrate is cooled to ambient temperature. Preferably, the inert carrier gas is either helium or nitrogen or a combination thereof. Oxygen gas is the preferred oxidant for use in the present invention, but it is possible, and within the scope of the present invention, that other oxidants may be used. Typically, according to the present invention, growth (deposition) rates of ≧about 200 Å/sec can be achieved.
The precursor mixture used in the present invention can preferably contain gas phase concentrations of ferrocene in the range of about 0.1 to about 5.0%. Preferably, the ferrocene concentration is in the range of from about 0.3 to about 3.0% and most preferably from about 0.6 to about 2.5%.
Oxygen is preferably present, as expressed in gas phase concentrations, in the amount of about 1 to about 50%. Preferably, the oxygen is present in the range of from about 3 to about 40% and most preferably from about 5 to about 35%.
As stated previously, an optional solvent may be used to dissolve the ferrocene, depending on the precise method of deposition. If a solvent is used, the concentrations of solvent will depend on the concentration of the individual ferrocene solutions and the flow rate needed to generate the ferrocene concentrations desired.
The preferred method of delivery, as described above, is through a chemical vapor deposition process, in an on-line float glass production process. Some possible methods of preparing precursors for use in the CVD process can include the use of a bubbler as well as solution delivery in conjunction with a thin film evaporator. U.S. Pat. No. 6,521,295 (column 3, line 60 etc.) discloses such a process and is hereby incorporated by reference as if set forth in its entirety herein.
The product made from the inventive process described herein will preferably be gold colored in both transmission and reflection (T and Rg). Such a product was previously unknown, as known gold tinted products based on silicon and even actual sputtered gold (i.e. sputtered elemental gold) products are green in transmission (i.e., a*<0).
As used herein, the term gold colored indicates: an a* value ≧about −5 and ≦about 10 and a b* value ≧about 10 and ≦about 40. Aesthetically pleasing gold colors, which may be most preferable in embodiments of the present invention, can have an a* value ≧about −1 and ≦about 8; and a b* value ≧about 18 and ≦about 40, wherein a* and b* are defined on the CIElab color scale.
The iron oxide coating deposited according to the present invention preferably has a thickness between about 300 to about 700 angstroms; more preferably between about 400 to about 650 angstroms; and most preferably between about 500 to about 625 angstroms.
The deposition rates indicated above (greater than about 200 Å/sec) can yield thicknesses of iron oxide layers greater than those known in the art. This can be advantageous in that the iron oxide layers are highly absorbing (especially in the blue range) and the thicker layers will thus absorb more light. These thicker layers than previously attained can thus yield more aesthetically pleasing colors, and can also result in the article having a gold color in both reflectance and transmittance.
An additional advantage of glass produced according to the present invention is that the coated article can be relatively more resistant to stress than known iron oxide articles. Specifically, the glass article described herein can retain the aesthetically pleasing color when tempered or after being bent or shaped.
As stated above, it is also possible in conjunction with the present invention to provide additional coatings with the iron oxide coating discussed herein. Coatings may be applied between the iron oxide coating and the substrate, and/or above the iron oxide coating. It is to be especially appreciated that it is possible to produce an iron oxide coating according to the present invention that is applied in conjunction with other layers appropriate to form a “low E” coating. An example of such a low E coating that could be used in conjunction with the present invention is the fluorine doped tin oxide coating that can be found in U.S. Pat. No. 5,698,262, which is hereby incorporated by reference as if set forth in its entirety herein.
The following examples, which constitute the best mode presently contemplated by the inventors for practicing the present invention, are presented solely for the purpose of further illustrating and disclosing the present invention, and are not to be construed as a limitation on the invention
All examples given depict actual experimental results. Depositions were carried out on a laboratory conveyor furnace at 1170 degrees F. at a line speed of 200 ipm (inches per minute). Total flow was between 35 and 45 slm (standard liters per minute) for all examples. Substrates were 12″×48″ soda-lime float glass coated with a nominal 200 angstrom thick film of SiO2.
Table 1 provides examples in which the ferrocene was delivered via a bubbler system. The ferrocene bubbler was held at 374 degrees F. In each table, thickness is reported in angstroms. O denotes a thickness determined optically while P represents a thickness established by chemical etching and profiling. Where thickness values are unlisted, the results were not obtained. Reflection was measured using a Minolta Spectrophotometer CM-2002 and the values are an average of several measurements across the 10″ width of coating.
Table 2 demonstrates the method of delivering the ferrocene as a solution using ethyl acetate (EtOAc) as the solvent. The thin film evaporator was kept at 500 degrees F.
Similarly, Table 3 illustrates the efficacy of delivering ferrocene dissolved in the solvent THF (tetrahydrofuran). The thin film evaporator was kept at 500 degrees F.
Table 4 displays the repeatability of the process. An additional seventeen samples were produced at a total flow of 41.5 slm comprising 0.2% ferrocene and 14.4% oxygen.
As stated previously, the coating of the present invention can be used in conjunction with additional layers to provide added functionality to the final product. This has been demonstrated by depositing iron oxide according to the present invention on Pilkington Energy Advantage™ The resulting monolithic properties are summarized in Table 5.
For calculation of the solar and thermal properties of 6 mm samples, the properties of the iron oxide film grown on 3 mm glass substrates was extrapolated to 6 mm substrates. This 6 mm monolithic sample provides a solar heat gain coefficient (SHGC) of 0.54 and a Uwinter value of 0.65. When placed in an IG unit using a 6 mm clear inboard light, with the coating on the number two surface and air as the insulating gas, one can obtain a SHGC of 0.47 and a Uwinter value of 0.34.
As used hereinabove, the U-factor measures how well a product prevents heat from escaping. The rate of heat loss is indicated in terms of the U-factor of a window assembly. U-factor ratings generally fall between 0.20 and 1.20. The lower the U-factor, the greater a window's resistance to heat flow and the better its insulating value. The U-factor is included in the energy performance rating (label) offered by the National Fenestration Rating Council (NFRC).
As used hereinabove, the Solar Heat Gain Coefficient (SHGC) measures how well a product blocks heat caused by sunlight. The SHGC is the fraction of incident solar radiation admitted through a window, both directly transmitted and absorbed, then subsequently released inward. SHGC is expressed as a number between 0 and 1. The lower a window's SHGC, the less solar heat it transmits.
In accordance with the provisions of the patent statutes, the present invention has been described in what is considered to represent its preferred embodiment. However, it should be noted that the invention can be practiced otherwise than as specifically illustrated and described without departing from its spirit or scope.
This application is a divisional application of application Ser. No. 10/765,256 filed Jan. 6, 2004, now U.S. Pat. No. 7,939,129, which is hereby incorporated by reference in its entirety.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
3695908 | Szupillo | Oct 1972 | A |
3852098 | Bloss et al. | Dec 1974 | A |
3892888 | Halaby et al. | Jul 1975 | A |
3920454 | Thompson | Nov 1975 | A |
3996395 | Chen et al. | Dec 1976 | A |
4027056 | Thompson | May 1977 | A |
4217392 | Vong | Aug 1980 | A |
4717584 | Aoki et al. | Jan 1988 | A |
4975324 | Torii et al. | Dec 1990 | A |
5006395 | Hori et al. | Apr 1991 | A |
5080847 | Hazeyama | Jan 1992 | A |
5133805 | Kurata et al. | Jul 1992 | A |
5183510 | Kimura | Feb 1993 | A |
5235936 | Kracklauer | Aug 1993 | A |
5464683 | Rudigier et al. | Nov 1995 | A |
5686178 | Stevens et al. | Nov 1997 | A |
5725672 | Schmitt et al. | Mar 1998 | A |
5753371 | Sullivan et al. | May 1998 | A |
5780372 | Higby | Jul 1998 | A |
6037091 | MacLeod et al. | Mar 2000 | A |
6187462 | Doi et al. | Feb 2001 | B1 |
6238738 | McCurdy | May 2001 | B1 |
6274207 | Balkus, Jr. et al. | Aug 2001 | B1 |
6291074 | Sakai et al. | Sep 2001 | B1 |
6524647 | Varanasi et al. | Feb 2003 | B1 |
6599355 | Schmidt et al. | Jul 2003 | B1 |
6692561 | Schoen et al. | Feb 2004 | B1 |
6706407 | Sugiyama et al. | Mar 2004 | B2 |
6783719 | Robinson et al. | Aug 2004 | B2 |
6821618 | Koujima et al. | Nov 2004 | B2 |
6827970 | Varanasi et al. | Dec 2004 | B2 |
7303658 | Sugiyama et al. | Dec 2007 | B2 |
20010039771 | Town | Nov 2001 | A1 |
20020136905 | Medwick et al. | Sep 2002 | A1 |
20030039844 | Sugiyama et al. | Feb 2003 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
1349464 | Apr 1974 | GB |
2000-119856 | Apr 2000 | JP |
WO-0130921 | May 2001 | WO |
Entry |
---|
Pflitsch, Christian, et al., “Growth of Thin Iron Oxide Films on Si(100) by MOCVD”. J. Electrochem. Soc., vol. 153, Issue 8, pp. C546-0550 (2006). |
Eiji Fuji, et al., Low-Temperature Preparation and Properties of Spinel-Type Iron Oxide Films by ECR Plasma-Enhanced Metalorganic Chemical Vapor Deposition; Japanese Journal of Applied Physics, Publication Office of Japanese Journal of Applied Physics, Tokyo, JP, vol. 32, No. 10B, Oct. 15, 1993, pp. L1527-L1529. |
Sharon, M. et al., Preparation and Characterization of Iron Oxide Thin Film Electrodes, Solar Energy Materials Netherlands, vol. 8, No. 4, Apr. 1983; pp. 457-469. |
Patent Abstracts of Japan, vol. 14, No. 582, Dec. 26, 1990 & JP 02 254155, Daido Steel Co., Ltd., Oct. 12, 1990. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20110281109 A1 | Nov 2011 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 10765256 | Jan 2004 | US |
Child | 13079129 | US |