The bond strength of coatings, such as thermal spay coatings, is of interest to those who use as well as those who develop these coatings. One current method of evaluating the bond strength of coating is test method ASTM-C633. The bond strength of some coatings, however, is too great to be measured with this test, due to failures that occur on test specimens in locations other than at the desired bond location. The industry would therefore be receptive to new test methods that allow for evaluation of the bond location of interest.
Disclosed herein is a coating bond test method. The method includes, attaching with an adhesive a pull-off bar to a coating on a planar surface of a substrate for which a normal bond strength between the coating and the substrate is sought, reducing a first area defined by an interface between the substrate and the coating to a value less than a second area defined by an interface between the adhesive and the coating, urging the pull-off bar away from the substrate in a direction normal to the planar surface until failure occurs, and recording a load at which failure occurred.
Further disclosed herein is a method of making a specimen for testing bond strength of a coating. The method includes, forming a substrate with a planar surface, applying a coating to the planar surface, attaching with adhesive a pull-off bar to the coating, and reducing a first area defined by an interface between the substrate and the coating to a value less than a second area defined by an interface between the adhesive and the coating.
The subject matter which is regarded as the invention is particularly pointed out and distinctly claimed in the claims at the conclusion of the specification. The foregoing and other features, and advantages of the invention are apparent from the following detailed description taken in conjunction with the accompanying drawings in which:
Referring to
The specimen 10 of the illustrated embodiment includes two engagement holes 42, with one being in the substrate 14 and the other being in the pull-off bar 30. The engagement holes 42 may be tapped with threads or have other features that enable a mandrel of a test machine (not shown) to be retained there within. Alternate methods of engaging the substrate 14 and the pull-off bar 30 to the machine are also contemplated. Such engagements allow the test machine to pull the substrate 14 away from the pull-off bar 30 in opposing directions that are essentially along a shared axis 46 of the pull-off bar 30 and the substrate 14 that is normal to the planar surface 18. The test machine monitors forces that are acting on the specimen 10. These forces are recorded at least until failure of the bond between the coating 22 and the planar surface 18 occurs. The stress at failure can be calculated by dividing the maximum force needed to cause the bond between the coating 22 and the planar surface 18 to fail by the first area 34.
The specimen 10 has advantages over those employed in other coating bond strength tests including ASTM-C633. ASTM-C633 calls for a specimen wherein an area between the coating and the substrate is the same as an area between the adhesive and the coating. It is not uncommon for samples tested in ASTM-C633 to fail at the adhesive-to-coating interface instead of the coating-to-substrate interface. Such a failure prevents determination of stress at the interface of interest which is the coating-to-substrate interface. The specimen 10 and methods disclosed herein, by setting the first area 34 be smaller than the second area 38, assures that the interface of interest, that is the interface between the coating 22 and the substrate 14 (at the planar surface 18) is where the bond failure occurs thereby providing useful data as to the actual strength of the bond in question, that is the bond of the coating 22 to the substrate 14.
The first area 34 can be made as small as is desired in relation to the second area 38. This area reduction allows the same tensile forces acting on both the adhesive 26 bonds (i.e. between the adhesive 26 and the coating 22 and the adhesive 26 and the pull-off bar 30) and the coating 22 bond (i.e. between the coating 22 and the substrate 14) to be distributed over the much smaller first area 34 and the larger second area 38. In so doing, a greater stress is applied to the coating bond than to the adhesive bonds. In an embodiment disclosed herein the first area 34 is reduced to a value that is less than half that of the second area 38. The first area 34 has a circular shape with a first diameter 54 of 0.4 inches while a second diameter 58 where the coating 22 is adhered to by the adhesive 26 is 1.0 inches. These diameters 54, 58 result in the first area 34 being 0.126 inches squared and the second area 38 being 0.785 inches squared. As such the ratio of the first area 34 to the second area 38 is just 0.16 or 16 percent. During fabrication of the test specimen 10, care should be taken to make the pull-off bar 30, the second area 38, the coating 22, and the end 74 (
Referring to
Once the adhesive 26 is fully cured a portion of at least the substrate 14 and the coating 22 can be reduced to that of the first area 34 (
While the invention has been described in detail in connection with only a limited number of embodiments, it should be readily understood that the invention is not limited to such disclosed embodiments. Rather, the invention can be modified to incorporate any number of variations, alterations, substitutions or equivalent arrangements not heretofore described, but which are commensurate with the spirit and scope of the invention. Additionally, while various embodiments of the invention have been described, it is to be understood that aspects of the invention may include only some of the described embodiments. Accordingly, the invention is not to be seen as limited by the foregoing description, but is only limited by the scope of the appended claims.
The present application is a 371 National Stage of International Patent Application No. PCT/US2015/055973, filed on Oct. 16, 2015, which claims priority to U.S. Provisional Application No. 62/064,568, filed on Oct. 16, 2014, the contents of which are incorporated herein by reference in their entirety.
Filing Document | Filing Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
PCT/US2015/055973 | 10/16/2015 | WO | 00 |
Publishing Document | Publishing Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
WO2016/061477 | 4/21/2016 | WO | A |
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
4548083 | Schuerer | Oct 1985 | A |
4586371 | Ivie et al. | May 1986 | A |
4606225 | Thomason | Aug 1986 | A |
4993268 | Thompson | Feb 1991 | A |
5768936 | Mann | Jun 1998 | A |
6117695 | Murphy | Sep 2000 | A |
6176141 | Chuang et al. | Jan 2001 | B1 |
6282950 | Taylor, Jr. et al. | Sep 2001 | B1 |
6289741 | Ghetzler | Sep 2001 | B1 |
6393905 | Steele | May 2002 | B1 |
7448279 | Brinz | Nov 2008 | B2 |
7497115 | Menendez Martin | Mar 2009 | B2 |
7669467 | Breuer | Mar 2010 | B2 |
7739918 | Lapeyronnie | Jun 2010 | B1 |
8096190 | Rey | Jan 2012 | B2 |
8387467 | Bassot | Mar 2013 | B2 |
8677813 | Sellars et al. | Mar 2014 | B2 |
8707798 | Gregg | Apr 2014 | B2 |
20050193829 | Brinz | Sep 2005 | A1 |
20060159513 | Breuer | Jul 2006 | A1 |
20070228591 | Rey | Oct 2007 | A1 |
20080011075 | Menendez Martin | Jan 2008 | A1 |
20110138926 | Bassot | Jun 2011 | A1 |
20110214497 | Sellars | Sep 2011 | A1 |
20130340534 | Gregg | Dec 2013 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
S5866837 | Apr 1983 | JP |
2004023111 | Mar 2004 | WO |
Entry |
---|
International Search Report and Written Opinion of the International Search Authority dated Jan. 4, 2016 in related PCT Application No. PCT/US2015/055973, 6 pages. |
Extended European Search Report for EP Application No. 15850011.6, dated Jun. 7, 2018, 9 pages. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20170234784 A1 | Aug 2017 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
62064568 | Oct 2014 | US |