Coating device for coating components

Information

  • Patent Grant
  • 11944990
  • Patent Number
    11,944,990
  • Date Filed
    Friday, December 1, 2017
    6 years ago
  • Date Issued
    Tuesday, April 2, 2024
    a month ago
Abstract
The disclosure concerns a coating device for coating components with a coating agent, in particular for painting motor vehicle body components, with a printhead, a multi-axis coating robot and with a robot control which controls the coating robot. The disclosure additionally provides for a separate printhead control which controls the printhead valve of the printhead.
Description
CROSS-REFERENCE TO RELATED APPLICATIONS

This application is a national stage of, and claims priority to, Patent Cooperation Treaty Application No. PCT/EP2017/081102, filed on Dec. 1, 2017, which application claims priority to German Application No. DE 10 2016 014 952.3, filed on Dec. 14, 2016, which applications are hereby incorporated herein by reference in their entireties.


BACKGROUND

The disclosure concerns a coating device for coating components with a coating agent, in particular for painting vehicle body parts.


For the serial painting of car body components, rotary atomizers are usually used as application devices, which have the disadvantage of a limited application efficiency, i.e. only a part of the applied paint is deposited on the components to be coated, while the rest of the applied paint has to be disposed of as so-called overspray.


A newer development line, on the other hand, provides for so-called printheads as application device, as known for example from DE 10 2013 002 412 A1, U.S. Pat. No. 9,108,424 B2 and DE 10 2010 019 612 A1. In contrast to the known rotary atomizers, such printheads do not emit a spray of the paint to be applied, but rather a narrowly confined paint jet, which is deposited almost completely on the component to be painted, so that virtually no overspray occurs.


However, when coating a limited area (e.g. a decor) on a component surface using such a printhead, the paint jet must be controlled very precisely in terms of time and space so that the boundaries of the area to be coated are adhered to without exceeding or falling below the boundaries of the area to be coated during painting. In order to be able to produce cost-effectively and competitively or to achieve high area performances, the applicators must be moved quickly with the robot, e.g. at a drawing speed in the range of 0.5 m/s to 0.75 m/s. The combination of exact switch-on and switch-off positions of the applicators or their individual valves as well as the high painting speed results in the necessity of very short reaction times or control pulses (e.g. 1 ms, 500 μs, 100 μs, 10 μs), which are usually not possible with robot controls. For this purpose, printhead valves in the printhead must be switched on or off very precisely in order to switch the painting beam on or off accordingly. However, this is not possible with the usual robot controls, since these robot controls work with a specified cycle time, whereby the cycle time of the robot control is too long, in order to achieve the necessary temporal accuracy with the control of the printhead valves.


From EP 2 196 267 A2 a coating system is known, in which a coating robot moves a printhead over the components to be coated. The coating robot is controlled by a robot control. In addition to the robot control, a separate control unit is provided, which controls a metering unit and sets the desired paint flow. A separate printhead control is not known from this publication.


With regard to the general technical background of the disclosure, reference is made to DE 10 2010 004 496 A1 and DE 10 2014 013 158 A1.





BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS


FIG. 1 shows a highly simplified schematic representation of a painting installation according to the disclosure,



FIG. 2 gives a schematic representation to explain the problem underlying the disclosure and the solution in accordance with the disclosure,



FIG. 3 shows a schematic representation of a printhead moving along a programmed path across the component surface,



FIG. 4 a schematic illustration to illustrate the problem of delayed printhead valve response, and



FIG. 5 shows a schematic diagram to illustrate the interpolation of the positions in the printhead control from the positions in the robot control.





DETAILED DESCRIPTION

The disclosure comprises the general technical teaching that the printhead valves in the printhead are not controlled by the robot control that controls the coating robot. Instead, the disclosure provides for a separate printhead control which controls the printhead valves in the printhead and operates sufficiently fast to achieve the required temporal and spatial accuracy in the control of the paint jets emitted. There should be communication with the robot control in order to instruct the printhead control accordingly.


The coating device according to the disclosure is used for coating components, such as vehicle body parts. However, the disclosure is not limited to vehicle body components with regard to the type of components to be coated. Rather, the components to be coated may also be other components.


It should also be mentioned that the coating device is preferably designed for coating components with a paint, i.e. the coating agent to be applied is preferably a paint, such as a solvent-based paint, a water-based paint, a colouring base coat or a clear coat, to name just a few examples. However, the disclosure is not limited to paints with regard to the type of coating to be applied, but can also be realized with other types of coating agents, such as adhesives, insulating materials, sealants, primers, etc., to name just a few examples.


The coating device according to the disclosure has a printhead with at least one nozzle as application device in order to deliver a coating agent jet onto the component to be coated, whereby the coating agent delivery through the nozzle is controlled by means of a printhead valve.


The term “printhead” used in the context of the disclosure is initially to be understood generally and serves only to distinguish it from conventional atomizers (e.g. rotary atomizers), which do not emit a spatially narrowly limited jet of coating agent, but a spray of the coating agent. Preferably, however, the printhead is a printhead as described for example in DE 10 2013 002 412 A1, U.S. Pat. No. 9,108,424 B2 and DE 10 2010 019 612 A1.


Furthermore, the coating device according to the disclosure includes a multi-axis coating robot that guides the printhead over the surface of the component to be coated. The coating robot preferably features serial robot kinematics with at least six or seven movable robot axes and a robot hand axis to guide the printhead over the component surface in a highly movable manner. Such coating robots are known from the state of the art and therefore do not need to be described in detail.


In addition, the coating device in accordance with the disclosure features a state-of-the-art robot control that controls the coating robot.


As already mentioned briefly above, the coating device according to the disclosure now distinguishes itself from the state of the art by a separate printhead control which is separated from the robot control and which controls at least one printhead valve, whereby the printhead control works sufficiently fast to achieve the required temporal and spatial accuracy in the control of the coating agent release.


It has already been mentioned briefly at the beginning that the robot control usually controls the coating robot with a specified first cycle time, whereby this first cycle time is too long to achieve the desired temporal and spatial accuracy of the coating release when controlling the printhead valve. The printhead control according to the disclosure works preferably clocked with a specified second cycle time, whereby this second cycle time of the printhead control is shorter than the first cycle time of the robot control, so that the printhead control can achieve the required temporal and spatial accuracy of the control of the coating release when controlling the printhead valve.


At a printhead travel speed, the position of the printhead is known only in quantized units of the robot control clock rate. At a travel speed of v=750 mm/s and a robot control clock rate of 4 ms, this position quantization is 3 mm. This is not sufficient for a more precise positioning (<1 mm, <0.1 mm) of the switch-on or switch-off point of the coating agent on the substrate, e.g. exactly at the edge of the substrate.


The second cycle time of the printhead position is therefore preferably at most 100 ms, 50 ms, 20 ms, 10 ms, 5 ms, 1 ms or even at most 100 μs.


The printhead control is preferably connected to the robot control on the input side and receives the current spatial position, the current spatial position and/or the current speed and/or the current spatial orientation of the printhead and/or the coating object as input information from the robot control at the robot control clock rate, so that the printhead control can take this information into account when controlling the printhead valve.


The printhead control interpolates or extrapolates (e.g. linear, with splines, cubically) these positions to its own time steps so that it obtains a higher position resolution. Thus the switch-on or switch-off point of the coating agent flow or coating agent drop can be set exactly.


The printhead control can also be integrated into the robot control as an independently operating module, for example.


It should also be mentioned that the coating device according to the disclosure preferably includes a colour changer which selects one of several coating agents and forwards the selected coating agent to the printhead.


In addition, the coating device according to the disclosure preferably includes a metering pump which meters the coating agent to be applied and transports it to the printhead.


In the preferred example of the disclosure, the printhead control controls not only the at least one printhead valve of the printhead, but preferably also the color changer and/or the metering pump.


It has already been mentioned above that the printhead control can switch the coating agent jet applied by the printhead on and off highly dynamically and precisely timed in order to achieve coating patterns with a very precise spatial resolution on the component surface. This is important, for example, if a surface to be coated has a sharp edge that must be adhered to exactly during the coating process. The printhead control works therefore preferably so fast and exact that the coating agent jet on the component surface reaches an exact spatial resolution of less than ±2 mm, ±1 mm, ±0.5 mm or even less than ±0.1 mm.


To achieve such an accurate coating, a measuring device is preferably provided which measures the spatial position and/or orientation of the component to be coated and transmits the determined position and/or orientation to the printhead control so that the printhead control can take this into account when controlling the printhead valves. The measuring device can be connected either directly to the printhead control or indirectly to the printhead control via the robot control. The only decisive factor in the disclosure is that the determined position or orientation of the component to be coated can be taken into account when controlling the printhead valves.


In a preferred embodiment of the disclosure, the measuring device has a camera which takes an image of the component to be coated, whereby this image is evaluated by an image evaluation unit which determines the spatial position or orientation of the component to be coated. Within the scope of the disclosure, it is also possible that several cameras are arranged at different positions in order to increase the accuracy of the position determination.


In one example of the disclosure, the measuring device can determine the spatial position and/or orientation of the component to be coated with a very high accuracy and a correspondingly low position tolerance, whereby the position tolerance is preferably smaller than ±2 mm, ±1 mm, ±0.5 mm, ±0.25 mm or even smaller than ±0.1 mm.


In one example of the disclosure, the coating device has, in addition to the printhead control and the robot control, an additional metering control for the aforementioned metering device (e.g. metering cylinder, metering pump, etc.), which meters the coating agent and conveys it to the printhead.


The metering control is preferably connected to the printhead control in order to synchronize the control of the metering pump with the control of the printhead valves of the printhead. If, for example, numerous printhead valves are suddenly opened, the consumption of coating agent suddenly increases, so that the metering pump should also be operated at a higher capacity.


In addition, the metering control is preferably also connected to the robot control in order to synchronize the control of the metering pump with the control of the coating robot. If, for example, the robot control controls the coating robot in such a way that the printhead is moved over the component surface at a high drawing speed, a large coating quantity usually also has to be conveyed by the metering pump, so that synchronisation of the robot control on the one hand and the metering control on the other hand is advantageous.


It has already been mentioned several times that the disclosure enables a highly dynamic and precise control of the printhead valves by providing a separate printhead control that works sufficiently fast. However, this only makes sense if the printhead valves themselves work sufficiently fast. The printhead valves therefore preferably have a very short switching time of at most 100 ms, 50 ms, 20 ms, 5 ms, 1 ms or even at most 100 μs. A very good reproducibility or repeatability of the switching times of all valves is even more important in order to correct them individually if necessary.


It should also be mentioned that the coating device according to the disclosure may have a first data interface for communicating with production planning, but this is known from the state of the art and therefore does not need to be described in detail.


In addition, the disclosure-based coating device may have a second data interface for recording a control file, whereby the control file may, for example, specify a graphic that is to be applied to the component surface by the coating device. This second data interface can, for example, be implemented using a USB stick reader (USB: Universal Serial Bus) or a memory card reader, to name just a few examples.


Furthermore, the disclosure offers the possibility of maintaining paint statistics. Furthermore, a paint requirement quantity calculation can follow within the framework of the disclosure. In addition, it is possible to communicate with a graphic visualization computer. Furthermore, the disclosure offers the possibility of communication with a safety control. In this case, a paint release can be carried out by a higher-level control system, which also checks whether a supply air system is in operation and whether there are any safety-relevant malfunctions. In addition, the printhead control can also release the paint if it determines that the colour print is in order, the metering pump is working, the coating robot is in its initial position, the optical measurement is complete, the vehicle has been measured and a position correction has been carried out.


It is also worth mentioning that the printhead preferably emits a narrowly limited jet of coating agent as opposed to a spray mist, as is the case with conventional atomizers (e.g. rotary atomizers).


In a variant of the disclosure, the printhead emits a droplet jet consisting of numerous droplets separated from each other in the longitudinal direction of the droplet jet, as opposed to a jet of coating agent hanging together in the longitudinal direction of the jet.


In another variant of the disclosure, the printhead, on the other hand, emits a coating medium jet being continuous in the longitudinal direction of the jet, in contrast to a droplet jet.


These two variants (droplet jet and continuous coating agent jet) can also be combined within the scope of the disclosure. For example, the printhead can alternately emit a droplet jet and a continuous coating agent jet. Furthermore, in the frame of the disclosure there is the possibility that a part of the nozzles of the printhead emits a droplet jet, while at the same time another part of the nozzles of the same printhead emits a continuous coating agent jet in the longitudinal direction of the jet.


It should also be mentioned that the coating medium pressure is preferably controlled with a relatively small fluctuation range of maximum ±500 mbar, ±200 mbar, ±100 mbar or even ±50 mbar.


The advantage of using a printhead as an application device is the high application efficiency, which is preferably greater than 80%, 90%, 95% or even 99%, so that the printhead is essentially overspray-free.


It should also be mentioned that the printhead preferably has a sufficiently high area coating performance to be able to paint vehicle body components efficiently. The printhead therefore preferably has a surface coating performance of at least 0.5 m2/min, 1 m2/min, 2 m2/min or even 3 m2/min.


It should also be mentioned that the volume flow of the applied coating agent and thus the exit speed of the coating agent is preferably adjusted in such a way that the coating agent does not bounce off the component after hitting it or does not penetrate the lower paint layer wet-on-wet or push it to the side or displace it in the case of a paint application.


The coating agent exit velocity from the printhead can therefore be in the range of 5 m/s to 30 m/s, for example, and any intermediate intervals are possible.


The application distance (i.e. the distance between nozzle and component surface) is preferably in the range of 4 mm to 200 mm.


It should also be mentioned that the printhead valve preferably has an electrically controllable actuator, such as a magnetic actuator or a piezo actuator, to enable the desired fast response.



FIG. 1 shows a highly simplified schematic representation of a painting system according to the disclosure for painting car body components 1 with a paint.


The car body components 1 are conventionally conveyed by a conveyor along a painting line through the painting installation, which is known from the state of the art and is therefore not shown for simplification.


The painting is done by a multi-axis painting robot 2 with a serial robot kinematics and several robot arms and a highly movable robot hand axis, which guides a printhead 3 as application device. The printhead 3 then emits coating agent jets 4 onto the surface of the vehicle body part 1, as shown schematically.


It should be mentioned here that the painting robot 2 is arranged in a painting booth, which typically contains several such painting robots 2 on both sides of the painting line, whereby only one single painting robot 2 is shown for simplification.


The painting robot 2 can be controlled in a conventional way by a robot control 5, whereby the robot control 5 operates with a specified cycle time and therefore only allows positioning with a limited spatial resolution according to the cycle time. The spatial resolution that can be achieved in this way, however, is not sufficiently accurate to allow the printhead 3 to coat the component surface with local accuracy.


The coating device according to the disclosure therefore additionally has a camera 6, which takes a picture of the motor vehicle body component 1 and the painting robot 2 in order to enable an exact relative positioning of the painting robot 2 with the printhead 3 relative to the motor vehicle body component 1.


The image captured by camera 6 is then evaluated by an image evaluation unit, whereby the image evaluation unit is not shown here for simplification.


It should also be mentioned that within the scope of the disclosure there is the possibility that several such cameras 6 are provided, which record the painting robot 2 and the vehicle body part 1 from different perspectives and thus enable a higher accuracy in position determination.


It has already been mentioned above that the robot control 5 has a relatively long cycle time which does not allow the required spatial accuracy to control the printhead 3 with high accuracy. The coating device according to the disclosure therefore preferably has a separate printhead control 7, which controls the printhead valves located in the printhead 3, which are not shown for simplification, highly precisely and highly dynamically.


The printhead control 7 is connected on the input side to the robot control 5 and receives from the robot control 5 the current position and orientation of the vehicle body series component 1 relative to the printhead 3, in order to be able to take this input information into account when controlling the printhead valves in the printhead 3.


It should also be mentioned that the coating device has, among other things, a colour changer and a metering pump, which are not shown for simplification. The colour changer and the metering pump are controlled by an additional metering control 8, which is connected to the printhead control 7 and the robot control 5.


In addition, a data interface to production planning 9 is provided.


Production planning 9 in turn has a data interface, for example in the form of a USB stick reader, so that a control file can be read in using a USB stick 10, which defines a graphic (e.g. a decor) that is to be applied to the component surface of the vehicle body component.


Here it is possible for the control file to be transferred directly from the end customer to the factory via the car dealerships. In the production software, the graphic is then assigned to the number of the car body. Data is then transferred to the robot control via an interface of the production software and identification is usually carried out via reading points and data carriers on the body. Not only the serial number can be stored on the data carrier, but also other data, if necessary the graphic data.


In general it should be mentioned that the robot control 5, the printhead control 7 and the metering control 8 are preferably designed as separate hardware components and are separated from each other.


Within the scope of the disclosure, however, there is also the possibility that the robot control 5, the printhead control 7 and the metering control 8 can only be implemented as separate software components in an otherwise uniform control unit.


In the following, the schematic representation in FIG. 2 is explained. FIG. 2 shows a programmed movement path 11 in the upper area, whereby the printhead 3 is moved along the programmed movement path 11 over the surface of the motor vehicle body component 1.


In addition, FIG. 2 shows in the upper area a limited area 12 to be coated, which is covered by the printhead 3 along the programmed movement path 11. At the time t=t1 the printhead 3 then passes the left boundary of the area 12 to be coated, so that the coating should also begin at this time. At the time t=t2 the printhead 3 then passes the opposite boundary of the surface 12 to be coated, so that the printhead 3 should stop the coating at exactly this time.



FIG. 2 shows in the middle area the actual opening times 13 of the printhead valves of the printhead 3. For simplification it is assumed that the printhead 3 has six nozzles in a row. In practice, however, printhead 3 actually has a larger number of nozzles and a larger number of nozzle rows, which is irrelevant for the principle of the disclosure.


If the printhead valves of printhead 3 are controlled exactly in time, the actual opening times 13 of the printhead valves of printhead 3 are exactly within the area 12 to be coated, as shown in FIG. 2, bottom right.


In fact, however, the printhead valves in printhead 3 would open with a time offset Δt when controlled by the relatively slow robot control 5 when printhead 3 passes the boundary of the area to be coated 12 along the programmed movement path 11. This means that the surface 12 to be coated is only coated with a corresponding spatial offset Δs=v·Δt, as shown in FIG. 4. The spatial offset Δs and thus the achievable spatial resolution during coating depends here on the drawing speed v of the printhead 3 along the programmed movement path 11 and the temporal offset Δt. The offset can, for example, be compensated by a lead time. One problem, however, is the timing of the control, which generates a repeat error (“jitter”). It is therefore important that the control of the printhead valves in the printhead 3 is highly dynamic and highly precise in terms and timing.



FIG. 3 shows a simplified schematic representation of the printhead 3 with six nozzles 14 arranged in a single nozzle row. In practice, however, the printhead 3 typically has a larger number of nozzles 14 per nozzle row and a larger number of nozzle rows, which is not significant for the disclosure.



FIG. 5 shows a schematic diagram to illustrate the interpolation of the printhead control positions from the robot control positions.


The upper part of the drawing shows the positions stored in the robot control along a time axis, whereby the positions are represented as time markers ♦ or time markers ⋄. Below this, the drawing shows the positions along the time axis stored in the printhead control.


The filled-in time markers ♦ each illustrate a time at which coating agent is applied, while the blank time markers ⋄ each symbolize a time at which no coating agent is applied.


It can be seen from the drawing that the temporal resolution and thus also the spatial resolution of the positions in the robot control is considerably coarser and thus less accurate than in the printhead control.


The printhead control enables this finer spatial resolution of the positions by the printhead control interpolating finer positions from the relatively coarse positions of the robot control.


The printhead is moved along a given movement path over the component surface, where the coating should start at time t=t1 and end again at time t=t2. It can be seen from the drawing that the coating is started or finished very precisely at the desired points in time t=t1 or t=t2, which is made possible by the aforementioned interpolation.


The disclosure is not limited to the embodiment described above. Rather, the disclosure also claims protection for the subject-matter and the features of the dependent claims independently of the referenced claims and in particular also without the features of the main claim.

Claims
  • 1. Coating device for coating components with a coating agent, with a) a printhead with a plurality of nozzles for delivering a coating agent jet to the component to be coated, anda plurality of printhead valves controlling the release of coating agent through the plurality of nozzles,b) a multi-axis coating robot which guides the printhead over the surface of the component to be coated,c) a robot control which controls the coating robot, andd) a printhead control that controls the printhead valves, the printhead control connected on the input side to the robot control and receives from the robot control at least one of a current spatial position, a current speed, and a current spatial orientation of the printhead as input information.
  • 2. Coating device according to claim 1, wherein a) the robot control controls the coating robot with a specific first cycle time in a clocked manner, andb) the printhead control controls a printhead valve of the plurality of printhead valves of the printhead in a clocked manner with a specific second cycle time,c) the second cycle time of the printhead control is shorter than the first cycle time of the robot control.
  • 3. Coating device according to claim 2, wherein the second cycle time of the printhead control is at most 100 ms.
  • 4. Coating device according to claim 1, wherein the printhead control controls at least one of the following in addition to the plurality of printhead valves of the printhead: a) a color changer which selects one of a plurality of coating means and forwards the selected coating means to the printhead,b) a metering device which meters the coating agent to be applied.
  • 5. Coating device according to claim 1, wherein the printhead control can switch on and switch off the coating agent jet applied by the printhead in a time-controlled manner with a spatial resolution on the surface of the component to be coated of less than ±2 mm.
  • 6. Coating device according to claim 1, further comprising: a) a measuring device for measuring the spatial position of the component to be coated, the measuring device being connected on the output side to the printhead control and transmitting the spatial position of the component to be coated to the printhead control, andb) a mechanical positioning device for precise positioning of the component to be coated.
  • 7. Coating device according to claim 6, wherein the measuring device comprises the following: a) at least one sensor for position determination, andb) an evaluation unit which evaluates a sensor signal of the sensor and determines therefrom the spatial position of the component to be coated.
  • 8. Coating device according to claim 6, wherein the measuring device determines the spatial position of the component to be coated with a position tolerance of less than ±2 mm.
  • 9. Coating device according to claim 1, wherein a) the coating device has a metering control for controlling a metering device which meters the coating agent and conveys it to the printhead, andb) the metering control is connected to the robot control in order to synchronize the control of the metering device with the control of at least one printhead valve of the plurality of printhead valves of the printhead, andc) the metering control is connected to the robot control in order to synchronize the control of the metering device with the control of the coating robot.
  • 10. Coating device according to claim 1, wherein the at least one printhead valve of the printhead has a short switching time of at most 100 ms.
  • 11. Coating device according to claim 1, further comprising a first data interface for communication with a production planning.
  • 12. Coating device according to claim 11, further comprising a second data interface for receiving a control file for coating the component with a graphic, the graphic being predetermined by the control file.
  • 13. Coating device in accordance with claim 1, wherein the printhead emits a continuous jet of coating medium in a longitudinal direction or a droplet jet consisting of numerous droplets separated from each other in the longitudinal direction and aligned along the longitudinal direction, in contrast to a spray mist.
  • 14. Coating device according to claim 1, wherein coating agent pressure is controlled with a maximum variation of ±500 mbar.
  • 15. Coating device according to claim 1, wherein the printhead has an application efficiency of at least 90% so that substantially all of the applied coating agent is completely deposited on the component without overspray.
  • 16. Coating device according to claim 1, wherein the printhead has a surface coating performance of at least 0.5 m2/min.
  • 17. Coating device according to claim 1, wherein a printhead valve of the plurality of printhead valves has an electrically controllable actuator in order to eject drops of the coating agent from the printhead.
  • 18. Coating device according to claim 6, wherein the measuring device for measuring the spatial position of the component to be coated is a camera.
  • 19. Coating device according to claim 18, further comprising an evaluation unit that evaluates a picture of the component to be coated and the printhead taken by the camera to extract the position of the printhead relative to the component to be coated.
  • 20. Coating device for coating components with a coating agent, with a) a printhead with a plurality of nozzles for delivering a coating agent jet to the component to be coated, anda plurality of printhead valves controlling the release of coating agent through the plurality of nozzles,b) a multi-axis coating robot which guides the printhead over the surface of the component to be coated,c) a robot control which controls the coating robot, andd) a printhead control that controls the printhead valves and at least one of a color changer which selects one of a plurality of coating means and forwards the selected coating means to the printhead and a metering device which meters the coating agent to be applied.
  • 21. Coating device in accordance with claim 20, wherein the printhead emits a continuous jet of coating medium in a longitudinal direction or a droplet jet consisting of numerous droplets separated from each other in the longitudinal direction and aligned along the longitudinal direction, in contrast to a spray mist.
Priority Claims (1)
Number Date Country Kind
10 2016 014 952.3 Dec 2016 DE national
PCT Information
Filing Document Filing Date Country Kind
PCT/EP2017/081102 12/1/2017 WO
Publishing Document Publishing Date Country Kind
WO2018/108565 6/21/2018 WO A
US Referenced Citations (175)
Number Name Date Kind
3421694 Muller Jan 1969 A
3717306 Hushon et al. Feb 1973 A
3981320 Wiggins Sep 1976 A
4141231 Kudlich Feb 1979 A
4375865 Springer Mar 1983 A
4383264 Lewis May 1983 A
4423999 Choly Jan 1984 A
4430010 Zrenner et al. Feb 1984 A
4435719 Snaper Mar 1984 A
4478241 Cardenas-Franco Oct 1984 A
4555719 Arway et al. Nov 1985 A
4593360 Cocks Jun 1986 A
4668948 Merkel May 1987 A
4714044 Kikuchi Dec 1987 A
4734711 Piatt et al. Mar 1988 A
4826135 Mielke May 1989 A
4894252 Bongen et al. Jan 1990 A
4941778 Lehmann Jul 1990 A
4974780 Nakamura et al. Dec 1990 A
4985715 Cyphert et al. Jan 1991 A
5050533 Zaber Sep 1991 A
5072881 Taube, III Dec 1991 A
5429682 Harlow, Jr. Jul 1995 A
5435884 Simmons et al. Jul 1995 A
5538221 Joswig Jul 1996 A
5556466 Martin et al. Sep 1996 A
5602575 Pauly Feb 1997 A
5636795 Sedgwick et al. Jun 1997 A
5647542 Diana Jul 1997 A
5659347 Taylor Aug 1997 A
5681619 Ogasawara Oct 1997 A
5740967 Simmons et al. Apr 1998 A
5843515 Crum et al. Dec 1998 A
5951882 Simmons et al. Sep 1999 A
5964407 Sandkleiva Oct 1999 A
5976343 Schlaak Nov 1999 A
6179217 Yoshida et al. Jan 2001 B1
6325302 Guzowski Dec 2001 B1
6540835 Kim et al. Apr 2003 B2
6607145 Boriani et al. Aug 2003 B1
6641667 Ochiai et al. Nov 2003 B2
6712285 Provenaz et al. Mar 2004 B2
6777032 Ogasahara et al. Aug 2004 B2
6811807 Zimmermann et al. Nov 2004 B1
6849684 Poppe et al. Feb 2005 B2
7160105 Edwards Jan 2007 B2
7178742 Nellentine et al. Feb 2007 B2
7182815 Katagami et al. Feb 2007 B2
7244310 Edwards Jul 2007 B2
7270712 Edwards Sep 2007 B2
7357959 Bauer Apr 2008 B2
7387071 Heinke et al. Jun 2008 B2
7449070 Fellingham Nov 2008 B2
7604333 Horsnell Oct 2009 B2
7757632 Edwards Jul 2010 B2
7837071 Achrainer Nov 2010 B2
7901741 Katagami et al. Mar 2011 B2
8028651 Rademacher et al. Oct 2011 B2
8118385 Van De Wynckel et al. Feb 2012 B2
8449087 Kataoka et al. May 2013 B2
8545943 Frankenberger et al. Oct 2013 B2
8652581 Merchant Feb 2014 B2
8678535 Beier et al. Mar 2014 B2
8875655 Pettersson et al. Nov 2014 B2
8882242 Beier et al. Nov 2014 B2
9010899 Harjee et al. Apr 2015 B2
9108424 Wallsten et al. Aug 2015 B2
9140247 Herre et al. Sep 2015 B2
9156054 Ikushima Oct 2015 B2
9266353 Beier et al. Feb 2016 B2
9393787 Ikushima Jul 2016 B2
9464573 Remy et al. Oct 2016 B2
9592524 Fritz et al. Mar 2017 B2
9701143 Ikushima Jul 2017 B2
9707585 Reimert et al. Jul 2017 B2
9844792 Pettersson et al. Dec 2017 B2
9901945 Fehr et al. Feb 2018 B2
9914150 Pettersson et al. Mar 2018 B2
10016977 Stefani et al. Jul 2018 B2
10105946 Nakamura et al. Oct 2018 B2
10150304 Herre et al. Dec 2018 B2
10252552 Pitz et al. Apr 2019 B2
10272677 Stefani et al. Apr 2019 B2
10532569 Wallsten et al. Jan 2020 B2
20010017085 Kubo et al. Aug 2001 A1
20010019340 Kubo et al. Sep 2001 A1
20020024544 Codos Feb 2002 A1
20020043280 Ochiai et al. Apr 2002 A1
20020043567 Provenaz et al. Apr 2002 A1
20020105688 Katagami et al. Aug 2002 A1
20020109741 Okabe et al. Aug 2002 A1
20020128371 Poppe et al. Sep 2002 A1
20030020783 Sanada Jan 2003 A1
20030041884 Bahr Mar 2003 A1
20030049383 Ogasahara et al. Mar 2003 A1
20040028830 Bauer Feb 2004 A1
20040089234 Hagglund et al. May 2004 A1
20040107900 Clifford et al. Jun 2004 A1
20040123159 Kerstens Jun 2004 A1
20040173144 Edwards Sep 2004 A1
20040221804 Zimmermann et al. Nov 2004 A1
20040231594 Edwards Nov 2004 A1
20040238522 Edwards Dec 2004 A1
20040256501 Mellentine et al. Dec 2004 A1
20040261700 Edwards Dec 2004 A1
20050000422 Edwards Jan 2005 A1
20050015050 Mowery et al. Jan 2005 A1
20050016451 Edwards Jan 2005 A1
20050023367 Reighard et al. Feb 2005 A1
20050156963 Song et al. Jul 2005 A1
20050243112 Kobayashi et al. Nov 2005 A1
20060061613 Fienup et al. Mar 2006 A1
20060068109 Frankenberger et al. Mar 2006 A1
20060146379 Katagami et al. Jul 2006 A1
20060238587 Horsnell Oct 2006 A1
20060251796 Fellingham Nov 2006 A1
20070062383 Gazeau Mar 2007 A1
20070292626 Larsson et al. Dec 2007 A1
20080271674 Rademarcher Nov 2008 A1
20080309698 Nakano et al. Dec 2008 A1
20090027433 Van De Wynckel et al. Jan 2009 A1
20090029069 Edwards Jan 2009 A1
20090117283 Herre May 2009 A1
20090181182 Sloan Jul 2009 A1
20100132612 Achrainer Jun 2010 A1
20100156970 Ikushima Jun 2010 A1
20100170918 Achrainer Jul 2010 A1
20100225685 Kwon et al. Sep 2010 A1
20100279013 Frankenberger et al. Nov 2010 A1
20100282283 Bauer Nov 2010 A1
20100321448 Buestgens et al. Dec 2010 A1
20110014371 Herre et al. Jan 2011 A1
20110084150 Merchant Apr 2011 A1
20110248046 Simion Oct 2011 A1
20110262622 Herre Oct 2011 A1
20120085842 Ciardella Apr 2012 A1
20120105522 Wallsten May 2012 A1
20120114849 Melcher May 2012 A1
20120162331 Kataoka Jun 2012 A1
20120186518 Herre Jul 2012 A1
20120219699 Pettersson et al. Aug 2012 A1
20120249679 Beier et al. Oct 2012 A1
20120282405 Herre Nov 2012 A1
20130201243 Yoshida Aug 2013 A1
20130215203 Chen Aug 2013 A1
20130257984 Beier et al. Oct 2013 A1
20130284833 Fritz et al. Oct 2013 A1
20140076985 Pettersson et al. Mar 2014 A1
20140242285 Pettersson et al. Aug 2014 A1
20140329001 Rouaud Nov 2014 A1
20150009254 Kaiba et al. Jan 2015 A1
20150042716 Beier et al. Feb 2015 A1
20150086723 Bustgens Mar 2015 A1
20150098028 Ohnishi Apr 2015 A1
20150328654 Schwab Nov 2015 A1
20150375258 Fritz et al. Dec 2015 A1
20150375507 Ikushima Dec 2015 A1
20160052312 Pitz et al. Feb 2016 A1
20160074822 Han Mar 2016 A1
20160288552 Ikushima Oct 2016 A1
20160306364 Ikushima et al. Oct 2016 A1
20170087837 Stefani et al. Mar 2017 A1
20170106393 Hamspon et al. Apr 2017 A1
20170136481 Fritz et al. May 2017 A1
20170252765 Medard Sep 2017 A1
20170267002 Pitz et al. Sep 2017 A1
20170299088 Rau Oct 2017 A1
20170361346 Lahidjanian et al. Dec 2017 A1
20180022105 Nakamura et al. Jan 2018 A1
20180056670 Kerr Mar 2018 A1
20180093491 Murayama et al. Apr 2018 A1
20180178505 Stefani et al. Jun 2018 A1
20180222186 Stefani et al. Aug 2018 A1
20180250955 Herre Sep 2018 A1
20190091712 Medard et al. Mar 2019 A1
Foreign Referenced Citations (198)
Number Date Country
2287527 Aug 1998 CN
1331661 Jan 2002 CN
1438942 Aug 2003 CN
1512919 Jul 2004 CN
1176815 Nov 2004 CN
1668386 Sep 2005 CN
1761530 Apr 2006 CN
101264698 Sep 2008 CN
101309755 Nov 2008 CN
101657264 Feb 2010 CN
101784348 Jul 2010 CN
102177002 Sep 2011 CN
102198434 Sep 2011 CN
102971080 Mar 2013 CN
103153483 Jun 2013 CN
103909743 Jul 2014 CN
104613205 May 2015 CN
104994966 Oct 2015 CN
105358259 Feb 2016 CN
205042649 Feb 2016 CN
106414081 Feb 2017 CN
1284250 Nov 1968 DE
7710895 Sep 1977 DE
3045401 Jul 1982 DE
3221327 Sep 1983 DE
3225554 Jan 1984 DE
3634747 Aug 1987 DE
3804092 Sep 1988 DE
4013322 Oct 1991 DE
4115111 Nov 1991 DE
4138491 May 1993 DE
9405600 Jun 1994 DE
68924202 Feb 1996 DE
19606716 Aug 1997 DE
19630290 Jan 1998 DE
19731829 Jan 1999 DE
19743804 Apr 1999 DE
9422327 Mar 2000 DE
19852079 May 2000 DE
19936790 Feb 2001 DE
20017629 Mar 2001 DE
10048749 Apr 2002 DE
69429354 May 2002 DE
69622407 Mar 2003 DE
10307719 Sep 2003 DE
60001898 Feb 2004 DE
102004021223 Dec 2004 DE
10331206 Jan 2005 DE
102004034270 Feb 2006 DE
102004044655 Mar 2006 DE
102004049471 Apr 2006 DE
60212523 Feb 2007 DE
69836128 Aug 2007 DE
60125369 Oct 2007 DE
102006021623 Nov 2007 DE
102006056051 May 2008 DE
102007018877 Oct 2008 DE
60132100 Dec 2008 DE
102007037663 Feb 2009 DE
10 2008 018 881 Sep 2009 DE
102008053178 May 2010 DE
102009029946 Dec 2010 DE
102009038462 Mar 2011 DE
102010004496 Jul 2011 DE
102010019612 Nov 2011 DE
102012006371 Jul 2012 DE
102012005087 Oct 2012 DE
102012005650 Sep 2013 DE
102012212469 Jan 2014 DE
102012109123 Mar 2014 DE
202013101134 Jun 2014 DE
102013002412 Aug 2014 DE
102013011107 Aug 2014 DE
102013205171 Sep 2014 DE
102014006991 Dec 2014 DE
102014007523 Nov 2015 DE
102014008183 Dec 2015 DE
10 2014 217 892 Mar 2016 DE
102014012705 Mar 2016 DE
102014013158 Mar 2016 DE
10 2016 014 952 Jun 2018 DE
0138322 Apr 1985 EP
0297309 Jan 1989 EP
0665106 Aug 1995 EP
1120258 Aug 2001 EP
1270086 Jan 2003 EP
1764226 Mar 2007 EP
1852733 Nov 2007 EP
1884365 Feb 2008 EP
1946846 Jul 2008 EP
2002898 Dec 2008 EP
2133154 Dec 2009 EP
2151282 Feb 2010 EP
2196267 Jun 2010 EP
2380744 Oct 2011 EP
2433716 Mar 2012 EP
2468512 Jun 2012 EP
2641661 Sep 2013 EP
2644392 Oct 2013 EP
2777938 Sep 2014 EP
2799150 Nov 2014 EP
2842753 Mar 2015 EP
3002128 Apr 2016 EP
3156138 Apr 2017 EP
3213823 Sep 2017 EP
3257590 Dec 2017 EP
3272669 Jan 2018 EP
3068626 Oct 2019 EP
3010918 Mar 2015 FR
2200433 Aug 1988 GB
2367771 Apr 2002 GB
2507069 Apr 2014 GB
S5722070 Feb 1982 JP
S62116442 May 1987 JP
H04-106669 Sep 1992 JP
H0798171 Oct 1995 JP
H09192583 Jul 1997 JP
2000158670 Jun 2000 JP
2000317354 Nov 2000 JP
2001129456 May 2001 JP
2001157863 Jun 2001 JP
2001239652 Sep 2001 JP
2001300404 Oct 2001 JP
2005501745 Jan 2002 JP
2002361863 Dec 2002 JP
2003506210 Feb 2003 JP
2003136030 May 2003 JP
2003164780 Jun 2003 JP
2004142382 May 2004 JP
2004528956 Sep 2004 JP
2004337710 Dec 2004 JP
2005526234 Sep 2005 JP
2007021760 Feb 2007 JP
2007152666 Jun 2007 JP
2007520340 Jul 2007 JP
2007245633 Sep 2007 JP
2007289848 Nov 2007 JP
2008110332 May 2008 JP
2009006324 Jan 2009 JP
2010528852 Aug 2010 JP
2010531213 Sep 2010 JP
2010531729 Sep 2010 JP
2010241003 Oct 2010 JP
2011206958 Oct 2011 JP
2012011310 Jan 2012 JP
2012506305 Mar 2012 JP
2012135925 Jul 2012 JP
2012206116 Oct 2012 JP
2012228643 Nov 2012 JP
2012228660 Nov 2012 JP
2013067179 Apr 2013 JP
2013530816 Aug 2013 JP
2013530816 Aug 2013 JP
2013188706 Sep 2013 JP
2014019140 Feb 2014 JP
2014050832 Mar 2014 JP
2014111307 Jun 2014 JP
2015-009222 Jan 2015 JP
2015027636 Feb 2015 JP
2015096322 May 2015 JP
2015520011 Jul 2015 JP
2015193129 Nov 2015 JP
2015535735 Dec 2015 JP
2016507372 Mar 2016 JP
2016526910 Sep 2016 JP
2016175077 Oct 2016 JP
2016175662 Oct 2016 JP
2018012065 Jan 2018 JP
2020513311 May 2020 JP
2020513314 May 2020 JP
8601775 Mar 1986 WO
9856585 Dec 1998 WO
02098576 Dec 2002 WO
03021519 Mar 2003 WO
2003062129 Jul 2003 WO
2004048112 Jun 2004 WO
2004085738 Oct 2004 WO
2005016556 Feb 2005 WO
2005075170 Aug 2005 WO
2006022217 Mar 2006 WO
2007121905 Nov 2007 WO
2009019036 Feb 2009 WO
2010046064 Apr 2010 WO
2010146473 Dec 2010 WO
2011044491 Apr 2011 WO
2011128439 Oct 2011 WO
2011138048 Nov 2011 WO
2013121565 Aug 2013 WO
2015071270 May 2015 WO
2015096322 Jul 2015 WO
2015186014 Dec 2015 WO
2016-087016 Jun 2016 WO
2016142510 Sep 2016 WO
2016145000 Sep 2016 WO
2017006245 Jan 2017 WO
2017006246 Jan 2017 WO
2018102846 Jun 2018 WO
2018108565 Jun 2018 WO
Non-Patent Literature Citations (64)
Entry
Chinese Office Action and Search Report for CN201780077603.3 dated Oct. 12, 2020 (15 pages; English translation not available).
Non-Final Office Action dated Feb. 5, 2021 for U.S. Appl. No. 16/468,701 (80 pages).
Non-Final Office Action dated Feb. 18, 2021 for U.S. Appl. No. 16/468,692 (97 pages).
EPO Official Notification of Opposition for Application No. 17821803.8 mailed Feb. 10, 2021 (64 pages; with English machine translation).
Ghasem, G. et al.; “Chapter 2 Background on Sprays and Their Production”, Industrial Sprays and Atomization: Design, Analysis and Applications, Jan. 1, 2002, Springer, London, pp. 7-33, XP009195118, ISBN: 978-1-4471-3816-7.
International Search Report and Written Opinion for PCT/EP2017/081141 dated Feb. 26, 2018 (17 pages; with English translation).
International Search Report and Written Opinion for PCT/EP2017/081114 dated May 15, 2018 (33 pages; with English translation).
Anonymous: “Roboterkalibrierung—Wikipedia”, Nov. 7, 2016, XP055471615, Gefunden im Internet: URL: https://de.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Roboterkalibrierung&oldid=159460756 [gefunden am Apr. 30, 2018] das ganze dockument (8 pages; with English translation).
Beyer, Lukas: “Genauigkeitssteigerung von Industrierobotern”, Forschungsberichte Aus Dem Laboratorium Fertigungstechnik/Helmut-Schmidt-Universitat, Universitat Der Bundeswehr Hamburg, Dec. 31, 2005, Seiten 1-4, XP009505118; ISSN: 1860-2886; ISBN: 978-3-8322-3681-6 (13 pages; with English machine translation).
International Search Report and Written Opinion for PCT/EP2017/081108 dated Feb. 28, 2018 (with English translation; 18 pages).
International Search Report and Written Opinion for PCT/EP2017/081099 dated Feb. 26, 2018 (21 pages; with English translation).
International Search Report and Written Opinion for PCT/EP2017/081102 dated Mar. 14, 2018 (16 pages; with English translation).
International Search Report and Written Opinion for PCT/EP2017/081105 dated Feb. 26, 2018 (19 pages; with English translation).
International Search Report and Written Opinion for PCT/EP2017/081152 dated May 15, 2018 (25 pages; with English translation).
International Search Report and Written Opinion for PCT/EP2017/081098 dated May 14, 2018 (26 pages; with English translation).
International Search Report and Written Opinion for PCT/EP2017/081101 dated Feb. 28, 2018 (14 pages; with English translation).
International Search Report and Written Opinion for PCT/EP2017/081121 dated Feb. 26, 2018 (20 pages; with English translation).
International Search Report and Written Opinion for PCT/EP2017/081117 dated Mar. 12, 2018 (27 pages; with English translation).
International Search Report and Written Opinion for PCT/EP2017/081123 dated Feb. 26, 2018 (20 pages; with English translation).
EPO Examination Report for Application No. 201702818.1 dated Dec. 18, 2020 (with English machine translation; 6 pages).
Chinese Office Action for Application No. CN20178007017.9 dated Aug. 31, 2020 (8 pages; with English translation).
Non Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 16/468,697 dated Oct. 22, 2020 (78 pages).
Non Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 16/468,696 dated Nov. 2, 2020 (58 pages).
Non Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 16/468,689 dated Oct. 15, 2020 (77 pages).
Chinese Office Action for CN201780077476.7 dated Sep. 23, 2020 (12 pages; English translation not available).
Non Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 16/468,700 dated Dec. 1, 2020 (73 pages).
JPO Submission for JP2019-531096; submitted Dec. 21, 2020 (32 pages; with English translation).
JPO Submission for JP2019-531957; submitted Dec. 21, 2020 (21 pages; with English translation).
Non-Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 16/468,691 dated Jan. 7, 2021 (79 pages).
European Search Report for EP20170638.9 dated Sep. 14, 2020 (4 pages—English translation not available).
European Search Report for EP20170021.8 dated Sep. 8, 2020 (11 pages—English translation not available).
European Search Report for EP20170025.9 dated Sep. 9, 2020 (4 pages—English translation not available).
European Search Report for EP20170016.8 dated Sep. 7, 2020 (4 pages—English translation not available).
China National Intellectual Property Administration Office Action and Search Report for CN Application No. 201780077018.3 dated Aug. 27, 2020 (11 pages; Search Report in English).
Final Office Action dated Mar. 19, 2021 for U.S. Appl. No. 16/468,696 (45 pages).
Final Office Action dated Jun. 11, 2021 for U.S. Appl. No. 16/468,701 (53 pages).
Notification of Reasons for Refusal for Application No. JP2019-532012 dated Jun. 22, 2021 (6 pages; with English machine translation).
Notification of Reasons for Refusal for Application No. JP2019-527330 dated Jun. 22, 2021 (10 pages; with English machine translation).
JPO Office Action dated Jul. 3, 2021 for Application No. JP2019-532024 (12 pages; with English machine translation).
Non-Final Office Action dated Aug. 27, 2021 for U.S. Appl. No. 16/468,695 (149 pages).
Final Office Action dated Apr. 19, 2021 for U.S. Appl. No. 16/468,700 (62 pages).
Japenese Patent Office Notice of Reasons of Refusal for Application No. JP 2019-531967 dated Jun. 8, 2021 (8 pages; with English machine translation).
Notice of Allowance mailed in U.S. Appl. No. 16/468,689 dated Jun. 2, 2021 (38 pages).
JPO Notification of Reasons for Rejection for Application No. JP2019-532030 dated May 18, 2021 (6 pages; with English translation).
CIPO Office Action for Application No. CN201780077474.8 dated Apr. 26, 2021 (17 pages; with English translation).
Chinese Office Action dated Jun. 2, 2021 for Application No. CN201780077017.9 (17 pages; with English machine translation).
Japanese Notification of Reasons for Rejection dated Jun. 1, 2021 for Application No. JP2019-531944 (14 pages; with English machine translation).
Japanese Notification of Reasons for Rejection dated Jun. 8, 2021 for Application No. JP2019-531957 (13 pages; with English machine translation).
Supplemental Notice of Allowability dated Jul. 8, 2021 for U.S. Appl. No. 16/468,696 (11 pages).
Liptak, Bela. (2006). Instrument Engineers' Handbook (4th Edition)—Process Control and Optimization, vol. 2—2.1.3.5 Process Time Constant, (pp. 99-102). Taylor & Francis. Retrieved from https://app.knovel.eom/hotlink/pdf/id:kt00CC7HL1/instrument-engineers/process-time-constant (Year: 2006).
Fianl Office Action dated May 13, 2021 for U.S. Appl. No. 16/468,691 (70 pages).
JPO Office Action for Application No. JP2019-531097 dated Jun. 29, 2021 (10 pages; with English machine translation).
JPO Office Action for Application No. 2019-531096 dated Jul. 6, 2021 (9 pages; with English machine translation).
JPO Office Action for Application No. 2019-531098 dated Jul. 6, 2021 (5 pages; English translation only).
JPO Office Action for Application No. 2019-531459 dated Jul. 6, 2021 (8 pages; with English machine translation).
JPO Decision to Grant dated Oct. 3, 2021 for Application No. JP2019-532113 (7 pages; with English machine translation).
Final Office Action dated Oct. 7, 2021 for U.S. Appl. No. 16/468,693 (58 pages).
Non Final Office Action dated Nov. 23, 2021 for U.S. Appl. No. 16/468,694 (163 pages).
Chinese Office Action in related application No. CN201780077045.0 dated Jan. 29, 2022 (17 pages; English machine translation provided).
JPO Decision to Grant in related application No. JP2019-532030 dated Dec. 1, 2022 (6 pages; English machine translation provided).
Non-Final Office Action dated Jan. 6, 2022 for related U.S. Appl. No. 16/468,701 (36 pages).
JPO Decision to Grant in related application JP2019-532012 dated Jan. 25, 2022 (6 pages; with English machine translation).
Non-Final Office Action for related U.S. Appl. No. 16/468,699 dated Mar. 9, 2022 (180 pages).
EPO Notification of Objection dated May 18, 2022 for related Patent No. EP3718643 (55 pages; with English machine translation).
Related Publications (1)
Number Date Country
20200078813 A1 Mar 2020 US