This application is a national stage of, and claims priority to, Patent Cooperation Treaty Application No. PCT/EP2017/081102, filed on Dec. 1, 2017, which application claims priority to German Application No. DE 10 2016 014 952.3, filed on Dec. 14, 2016, which applications are hereby incorporated herein by reference in their entireties.
The disclosure concerns a coating device for coating components with a coating agent, in particular for painting vehicle body parts.
For the serial painting of car body components, rotary atomizers are usually used as application devices, which have the disadvantage of a limited application efficiency, i.e. only a part of the applied paint is deposited on the components to be coated, while the rest of the applied paint has to be disposed of as so-called overspray.
A newer development line, on the other hand, provides for so-called printheads as application device, as known for example from DE 10 2013 002 412 A1, U.S. Pat. No. 9,108,424 B2 and DE 10 2010 019 612 A1. In contrast to the known rotary atomizers, such printheads do not emit a spray of the paint to be applied, but rather a narrowly confined paint jet, which is deposited almost completely on the component to be painted, so that virtually no overspray occurs.
However, when coating a limited area (e.g. a decor) on a component surface using such a printhead, the paint jet must be controlled very precisely in terms of time and space so that the boundaries of the area to be coated are adhered to without exceeding or falling below the boundaries of the area to be coated during painting. In order to be able to produce cost-effectively and competitively or to achieve high area performances, the applicators must be moved quickly with the robot, e.g. at a drawing speed in the range of 0.5 m/s to 0.75 m/s. The combination of exact switch-on and switch-off positions of the applicators or their individual valves as well as the high painting speed results in the necessity of very short reaction times or control pulses (e.g. 1 ms, 500 μs, 100 μs, 10 μs), which are usually not possible with robot controls. For this purpose, printhead valves in the printhead must be switched on or off very precisely in order to switch the painting beam on or off accordingly. However, this is not possible with the usual robot controls, since these robot controls work with a specified cycle time, whereby the cycle time of the robot control is too long, in order to achieve the necessary temporal accuracy with the control of the printhead valves.
From EP 2 196 267 A2 a coating system is known, in which a coating robot moves a printhead over the components to be coated. The coating robot is controlled by a robot control. In addition to the robot control, a separate control unit is provided, which controls a metering unit and sets the desired paint flow. A separate printhead control is not known from this publication.
With regard to the general technical background of the disclosure, reference is made to DE 10 2010 004 496 A1 and DE 10 2014 013 158 A1.
The disclosure comprises the general technical teaching that the printhead valves in the printhead are not controlled by the robot control that controls the coating robot. Instead, the disclosure provides for a separate printhead control which controls the printhead valves in the printhead and operates sufficiently fast to achieve the required temporal and spatial accuracy in the control of the paint jets emitted. There should be communication with the robot control in order to instruct the printhead control accordingly.
The coating device according to the disclosure is used for coating components, such as vehicle body parts. However, the disclosure is not limited to vehicle body components with regard to the type of components to be coated. Rather, the components to be coated may also be other components.
It should also be mentioned that the coating device is preferably designed for coating components with a paint, i.e. the coating agent to be applied is preferably a paint, such as a solvent-based paint, a water-based paint, a colouring base coat or a clear coat, to name just a few examples. However, the disclosure is not limited to paints with regard to the type of coating to be applied, but can also be realized with other types of coating agents, such as adhesives, insulating materials, sealants, primers, etc., to name just a few examples.
The coating device according to the disclosure has a printhead with at least one nozzle as application device in order to deliver a coating agent jet onto the component to be coated, whereby the coating agent delivery through the nozzle is controlled by means of a printhead valve.
The term “printhead” used in the context of the disclosure is initially to be understood generally and serves only to distinguish it from conventional atomizers (e.g. rotary atomizers), which do not emit a spatially narrowly limited jet of coating agent, but a spray of the coating agent. Preferably, however, the printhead is a printhead as described for example in DE 10 2013 002 412 A1, U.S. Pat. No. 9,108,424 B2 and DE 10 2010 019 612 A1.
Furthermore, the coating device according to the disclosure includes a multi-axis coating robot that guides the printhead over the surface of the component to be coated. The coating robot preferably features serial robot kinematics with at least six or seven movable robot axes and a robot hand axis to guide the printhead over the component surface in a highly movable manner. Such coating robots are known from the state of the art and therefore do not need to be described in detail.
In addition, the coating device in accordance with the disclosure features a state-of-the-art robot control that controls the coating robot.
As already mentioned briefly above, the coating device according to the disclosure now distinguishes itself from the state of the art by a separate printhead control which is separated from the robot control and which controls at least one printhead valve, whereby the printhead control works sufficiently fast to achieve the required temporal and spatial accuracy in the control of the coating agent release.
It has already been mentioned briefly at the beginning that the robot control usually controls the coating robot with a specified first cycle time, whereby this first cycle time is too long to achieve the desired temporal and spatial accuracy of the coating release when controlling the printhead valve. The printhead control according to the disclosure works preferably clocked with a specified second cycle time, whereby this second cycle time of the printhead control is shorter than the first cycle time of the robot control, so that the printhead control can achieve the required temporal and spatial accuracy of the control of the coating release when controlling the printhead valve.
At a printhead travel speed, the position of the printhead is known only in quantized units of the robot control clock rate. At a travel speed of v=750 mm/s and a robot control clock rate of 4 ms, this position quantization is 3 mm. This is not sufficient for a more precise positioning (<1 mm, <0.1 mm) of the switch-on or switch-off point of the coating agent on the substrate, e.g. exactly at the edge of the substrate.
The second cycle time of the printhead position is therefore preferably at most 100 ms, 50 ms, 20 ms, 10 ms, 5 ms, 1 ms or even at most 100 μs.
The printhead control is preferably connected to the robot control on the input side and receives the current spatial position, the current spatial position and/or the current speed and/or the current spatial orientation of the printhead and/or the coating object as input information from the robot control at the robot control clock rate, so that the printhead control can take this information into account when controlling the printhead valve.
The printhead control interpolates or extrapolates (e.g. linear, with splines, cubically) these positions to its own time steps so that it obtains a higher position resolution. Thus the switch-on or switch-off point of the coating agent flow or coating agent drop can be set exactly.
The printhead control can also be integrated into the robot control as an independently operating module, for example.
It should also be mentioned that the coating device according to the disclosure preferably includes a colour changer which selects one of several coating agents and forwards the selected coating agent to the printhead.
In addition, the coating device according to the disclosure preferably includes a metering pump which meters the coating agent to be applied and transports it to the printhead.
In the preferred example of the disclosure, the printhead control controls not only the at least one printhead valve of the printhead, but preferably also the color changer and/or the metering pump.
It has already been mentioned above that the printhead control can switch the coating agent jet applied by the printhead on and off highly dynamically and precisely timed in order to achieve coating patterns with a very precise spatial resolution on the component surface. This is important, for example, if a surface to be coated has a sharp edge that must be adhered to exactly during the coating process. The printhead control works therefore preferably so fast and exact that the coating agent jet on the component surface reaches an exact spatial resolution of less than ±2 mm, ±1 mm, ±0.5 mm or even less than ±0.1 mm.
To achieve such an accurate coating, a measuring device is preferably provided which measures the spatial position and/or orientation of the component to be coated and transmits the determined position and/or orientation to the printhead control so that the printhead control can take this into account when controlling the printhead valves. The measuring device can be connected either directly to the printhead control or indirectly to the printhead control via the robot control. The only decisive factor in the disclosure is that the determined position or orientation of the component to be coated can be taken into account when controlling the printhead valves.
In a preferred embodiment of the disclosure, the measuring device has a camera which takes an image of the component to be coated, whereby this image is evaluated by an image evaluation unit which determines the spatial position or orientation of the component to be coated. Within the scope of the disclosure, it is also possible that several cameras are arranged at different positions in order to increase the accuracy of the position determination.
In one example of the disclosure, the measuring device can determine the spatial position and/or orientation of the component to be coated with a very high accuracy and a correspondingly low position tolerance, whereby the position tolerance is preferably smaller than ±2 mm, ±1 mm, ±0.5 mm, ±0.25 mm or even smaller than ±0.1 mm.
In one example of the disclosure, the coating device has, in addition to the printhead control and the robot control, an additional metering control for the aforementioned metering device (e.g. metering cylinder, metering pump, etc.), which meters the coating agent and conveys it to the printhead.
The metering control is preferably connected to the printhead control in order to synchronize the control of the metering pump with the control of the printhead valves of the printhead. If, for example, numerous printhead valves are suddenly opened, the consumption of coating agent suddenly increases, so that the metering pump should also be operated at a higher capacity.
In addition, the metering control is preferably also connected to the robot control in order to synchronize the control of the metering pump with the control of the coating robot. If, for example, the robot control controls the coating robot in such a way that the printhead is moved over the component surface at a high drawing speed, a large coating quantity usually also has to be conveyed by the metering pump, so that synchronisation of the robot control on the one hand and the metering control on the other hand is advantageous.
It has already been mentioned several times that the disclosure enables a highly dynamic and precise control of the printhead valves by providing a separate printhead control that works sufficiently fast. However, this only makes sense if the printhead valves themselves work sufficiently fast. The printhead valves therefore preferably have a very short switching time of at most 100 ms, 50 ms, 20 ms, 5 ms, 1 ms or even at most 100 μs. A very good reproducibility or repeatability of the switching times of all valves is even more important in order to correct them individually if necessary.
It should also be mentioned that the coating device according to the disclosure may have a first data interface for communicating with production planning, but this is known from the state of the art and therefore does not need to be described in detail.
In addition, the disclosure-based coating device may have a second data interface for recording a control file, whereby the control file may, for example, specify a graphic that is to be applied to the component surface by the coating device. This second data interface can, for example, be implemented using a USB stick reader (USB: Universal Serial Bus) or a memory card reader, to name just a few examples.
Furthermore, the disclosure offers the possibility of maintaining paint statistics. Furthermore, a paint requirement quantity calculation can follow within the framework of the disclosure. In addition, it is possible to communicate with a graphic visualization computer. Furthermore, the disclosure offers the possibility of communication with a safety control. In this case, a paint release can be carried out by a higher-level control system, which also checks whether a supply air system is in operation and whether there are any safety-relevant malfunctions. In addition, the printhead control can also release the paint if it determines that the colour print is in order, the metering pump is working, the coating robot is in its initial position, the optical measurement is complete, the vehicle has been measured and a position correction has been carried out.
It is also worth mentioning that the printhead preferably emits a narrowly limited jet of coating agent as opposed to a spray mist, as is the case with conventional atomizers (e.g. rotary atomizers).
In a variant of the disclosure, the printhead emits a droplet jet consisting of numerous droplets separated from each other in the longitudinal direction of the droplet jet, as opposed to a jet of coating agent hanging together in the longitudinal direction of the jet.
In another variant of the disclosure, the printhead, on the other hand, emits a coating medium jet being continuous in the longitudinal direction of the jet, in contrast to a droplet jet.
These two variants (droplet jet and continuous coating agent jet) can also be combined within the scope of the disclosure. For example, the printhead can alternately emit a droplet jet and a continuous coating agent jet. Furthermore, in the frame of the disclosure there is the possibility that a part of the nozzles of the printhead emits a droplet jet, while at the same time another part of the nozzles of the same printhead emits a continuous coating agent jet in the longitudinal direction of the jet.
It should also be mentioned that the coating medium pressure is preferably controlled with a relatively small fluctuation range of maximum ±500 mbar, ±200 mbar, ±100 mbar or even ±50 mbar.
The advantage of using a printhead as an application device is the high application efficiency, which is preferably greater than 80%, 90%, 95% or even 99%, so that the printhead is essentially overspray-free.
It should also be mentioned that the printhead preferably has a sufficiently high area coating performance to be able to paint vehicle body components efficiently. The printhead therefore preferably has a surface coating performance of at least 0.5 m2/min, 1 m2/min, 2 m2/min or even 3 m2/min.
It should also be mentioned that the volume flow of the applied coating agent and thus the exit speed of the coating agent is preferably adjusted in such a way that the coating agent does not bounce off the component after hitting it or does not penetrate the lower paint layer wet-on-wet or push it to the side or displace it in the case of a paint application.
The coating agent exit velocity from the printhead can therefore be in the range of 5 m/s to 30 m/s, for example, and any intermediate intervals are possible.
The application distance (i.e. the distance between nozzle and component surface) is preferably in the range of 4 mm to 200 mm.
It should also be mentioned that the printhead valve preferably has an electrically controllable actuator, such as a magnetic actuator or a piezo actuator, to enable the desired fast response.
The car body components 1 are conventionally conveyed by a conveyor along a painting line through the painting installation, which is known from the state of the art and is therefore not shown for simplification.
The painting is done by a multi-axis painting robot 2 with a serial robot kinematics and several robot arms and a highly movable robot hand axis, which guides a printhead 3 as application device. The printhead 3 then emits coating agent jets 4 onto the surface of the vehicle body part 1, as shown schematically.
It should be mentioned here that the painting robot 2 is arranged in a painting booth, which typically contains several such painting robots 2 on both sides of the painting line, whereby only one single painting robot 2 is shown for simplification.
The painting robot 2 can be controlled in a conventional way by a robot control 5, whereby the robot control 5 operates with a specified cycle time and therefore only allows positioning with a limited spatial resolution according to the cycle time. The spatial resolution that can be achieved in this way, however, is not sufficiently accurate to allow the printhead 3 to coat the component surface with local accuracy.
The coating device according to the disclosure therefore additionally has a camera 6, which takes a picture of the motor vehicle body component 1 and the painting robot 2 in order to enable an exact relative positioning of the painting robot 2 with the printhead 3 relative to the motor vehicle body component 1.
The image captured by camera 6 is then evaluated by an image evaluation unit, whereby the image evaluation unit is not shown here for simplification.
It should also be mentioned that within the scope of the disclosure there is the possibility that several such cameras 6 are provided, which record the painting robot 2 and the vehicle body part 1 from different perspectives and thus enable a higher accuracy in position determination.
It has already been mentioned above that the robot control 5 has a relatively long cycle time which does not allow the required spatial accuracy to control the printhead 3 with high accuracy. The coating device according to the disclosure therefore preferably has a separate printhead control 7, which controls the printhead valves located in the printhead 3, which are not shown for simplification, highly precisely and highly dynamically.
The printhead control 7 is connected on the input side to the robot control 5 and receives from the robot control 5 the current position and orientation of the vehicle body series component 1 relative to the printhead 3, in order to be able to take this input information into account when controlling the printhead valves in the printhead 3.
It should also be mentioned that the coating device has, among other things, a colour changer and a metering pump, which are not shown for simplification. The colour changer and the metering pump are controlled by an additional metering control 8, which is connected to the printhead control 7 and the robot control 5.
In addition, a data interface to production planning 9 is provided.
Production planning 9 in turn has a data interface, for example in the form of a USB stick reader, so that a control file can be read in using a USB stick 10, which defines a graphic (e.g. a decor) that is to be applied to the component surface of the vehicle body component.
Here it is possible for the control file to be transferred directly from the end customer to the factory via the car dealerships. In the production software, the graphic is then assigned to the number of the car body. Data is then transferred to the robot control via an interface of the production software and identification is usually carried out via reading points and data carriers on the body. Not only the serial number can be stored on the data carrier, but also other data, if necessary the graphic data.
In general it should be mentioned that the robot control 5, the printhead control 7 and the metering control 8 are preferably designed as separate hardware components and are separated from each other.
Within the scope of the disclosure, however, there is also the possibility that the robot control 5, the printhead control 7 and the metering control 8 can only be implemented as separate software components in an otherwise uniform control unit.
In the following, the schematic representation in
In addition,
If the printhead valves of printhead 3 are controlled exactly in time, the actual opening times 13 of the printhead valves of printhead 3 are exactly within the area 12 to be coated, as shown in
In fact, however, the printhead valves in printhead 3 would open with a time offset Δt when controlled by the relatively slow robot control 5 when printhead 3 passes the boundary of the area to be coated 12 along the programmed movement path 11. This means that the surface 12 to be coated is only coated with a corresponding spatial offset Δs=v·Δt, as shown in
The upper part of the drawing shows the positions stored in the robot control along a time axis, whereby the positions are represented as time markers ♦ or time markers ⋄. Below this, the drawing shows the positions along the time axis stored in the printhead control.
The filled-in time markers ♦ each illustrate a time at which coating agent is applied, while the blank time markers ⋄ each symbolize a time at which no coating agent is applied.
It can be seen from the drawing that the temporal resolution and thus also the spatial resolution of the positions in the robot control is considerably coarser and thus less accurate than in the printhead control.
The printhead control enables this finer spatial resolution of the positions by the printhead control interpolating finer positions from the relatively coarse positions of the robot control.
The printhead is moved along a given movement path over the component surface, where the coating should start at time t=t1 and end again at time t=t2. It can be seen from the drawing that the coating is started or finished very precisely at the desired points in time t=t1 or t=t2, which is made possible by the aforementioned interpolation.
The disclosure is not limited to the embodiment described above. Rather, the disclosure also claims protection for the subject-matter and the features of the dependent claims independently of the referenced claims and in particular also without the features of the main claim.
Number | Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
10 2016 014 952.3 | Dec 2016 | DE | national |
Filing Document | Filing Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
PCT/EP2017/081102 | 12/1/2017 | WO |
Publishing Document | Publishing Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
WO2018/108565 | 6/21/2018 | WO | A |
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
3421694 | Muller | Jan 1969 | A |
3717306 | Hushon et al. | Feb 1973 | A |
3981320 | Wiggins | Sep 1976 | A |
4141231 | Kudlich | Feb 1979 | A |
4375865 | Springer | Mar 1983 | A |
4383264 | Lewis | May 1983 | A |
4423999 | Choly | Jan 1984 | A |
4430010 | Zrenner et al. | Feb 1984 | A |
4435719 | Snaper | Mar 1984 | A |
4478241 | Cardenas-Franco | Oct 1984 | A |
4555719 | Arway et al. | Nov 1985 | A |
4593360 | Cocks | Jun 1986 | A |
4668948 | Merkel | May 1987 | A |
4714044 | Kikuchi | Dec 1987 | A |
4734711 | Piatt et al. | Mar 1988 | A |
4826135 | Mielke | May 1989 | A |
4894252 | Bongen et al. | Jan 1990 | A |
4941778 | Lehmann | Jul 1990 | A |
4974780 | Nakamura et al. | Dec 1990 | A |
4985715 | Cyphert et al. | Jan 1991 | A |
5050533 | Zaber | Sep 1991 | A |
5072881 | Taube, III | Dec 1991 | A |
5429682 | Harlow, Jr. | Jul 1995 | A |
5435884 | Simmons et al. | Jul 1995 | A |
5538221 | Joswig | Jul 1996 | A |
5556466 | Martin et al. | Sep 1996 | A |
5602575 | Pauly | Feb 1997 | A |
5636795 | Sedgwick et al. | Jun 1997 | A |
5647542 | Diana | Jul 1997 | A |
5659347 | Taylor | Aug 1997 | A |
5681619 | Ogasawara | Oct 1997 | A |
5740967 | Simmons et al. | Apr 1998 | A |
5843515 | Crum et al. | Dec 1998 | A |
5951882 | Simmons et al. | Sep 1999 | A |
5964407 | Sandkleiva | Oct 1999 | A |
5976343 | Schlaak | Nov 1999 | A |
6179217 | Yoshida et al. | Jan 2001 | B1 |
6325302 | Guzowski | Dec 2001 | B1 |
6540835 | Kim et al. | Apr 2003 | B2 |
6607145 | Boriani et al. | Aug 2003 | B1 |
6641667 | Ochiai et al. | Nov 2003 | B2 |
6712285 | Provenaz et al. | Mar 2004 | B2 |
6777032 | Ogasahara et al. | Aug 2004 | B2 |
6811807 | Zimmermann et al. | Nov 2004 | B1 |
6849684 | Poppe et al. | Feb 2005 | B2 |
7160105 | Edwards | Jan 2007 | B2 |
7178742 | Nellentine et al. | Feb 2007 | B2 |
7182815 | Katagami et al. | Feb 2007 | B2 |
7244310 | Edwards | Jul 2007 | B2 |
7270712 | Edwards | Sep 2007 | B2 |
7357959 | Bauer | Apr 2008 | B2 |
7387071 | Heinke et al. | Jun 2008 | B2 |
7449070 | Fellingham | Nov 2008 | B2 |
7604333 | Horsnell | Oct 2009 | B2 |
7757632 | Edwards | Jul 2010 | B2 |
7837071 | Achrainer | Nov 2010 | B2 |
7901741 | Katagami et al. | Mar 2011 | B2 |
8028651 | Rademacher et al. | Oct 2011 | B2 |
8118385 | Van De Wynckel et al. | Feb 2012 | B2 |
8449087 | Kataoka et al. | May 2013 | B2 |
8545943 | Frankenberger et al. | Oct 2013 | B2 |
8652581 | Merchant | Feb 2014 | B2 |
8678535 | Beier et al. | Mar 2014 | B2 |
8875655 | Pettersson et al. | Nov 2014 | B2 |
8882242 | Beier et al. | Nov 2014 | B2 |
9010899 | Harjee et al. | Apr 2015 | B2 |
9108424 | Wallsten et al. | Aug 2015 | B2 |
9140247 | Herre et al. | Sep 2015 | B2 |
9156054 | Ikushima | Oct 2015 | B2 |
9266353 | Beier et al. | Feb 2016 | B2 |
9393787 | Ikushima | Jul 2016 | B2 |
9464573 | Remy et al. | Oct 2016 | B2 |
9592524 | Fritz et al. | Mar 2017 | B2 |
9701143 | Ikushima | Jul 2017 | B2 |
9707585 | Reimert et al. | Jul 2017 | B2 |
9844792 | Pettersson et al. | Dec 2017 | B2 |
9901945 | Fehr et al. | Feb 2018 | B2 |
9914150 | Pettersson et al. | Mar 2018 | B2 |
10016977 | Stefani et al. | Jul 2018 | B2 |
10105946 | Nakamura et al. | Oct 2018 | B2 |
10150304 | Herre et al. | Dec 2018 | B2 |
10252552 | Pitz et al. | Apr 2019 | B2 |
10272677 | Stefani et al. | Apr 2019 | B2 |
10532569 | Wallsten et al. | Jan 2020 | B2 |
20010017085 | Kubo et al. | Aug 2001 | A1 |
20010019340 | Kubo et al. | Sep 2001 | A1 |
20020024544 | Codos | Feb 2002 | A1 |
20020043280 | Ochiai et al. | Apr 2002 | A1 |
20020043567 | Provenaz et al. | Apr 2002 | A1 |
20020105688 | Katagami et al. | Aug 2002 | A1 |
20020109741 | Okabe et al. | Aug 2002 | A1 |
20020128371 | Poppe et al. | Sep 2002 | A1 |
20030020783 | Sanada | Jan 2003 | A1 |
20030041884 | Bahr | Mar 2003 | A1 |
20030049383 | Ogasahara et al. | Mar 2003 | A1 |
20040028830 | Bauer | Feb 2004 | A1 |
20040089234 | Hagglund et al. | May 2004 | A1 |
20040107900 | Clifford et al. | Jun 2004 | A1 |
20040123159 | Kerstens | Jun 2004 | A1 |
20040173144 | Edwards | Sep 2004 | A1 |
20040221804 | Zimmermann et al. | Nov 2004 | A1 |
20040231594 | Edwards | Nov 2004 | A1 |
20040238522 | Edwards | Dec 2004 | A1 |
20040256501 | Mellentine et al. | Dec 2004 | A1 |
20040261700 | Edwards | Dec 2004 | A1 |
20050000422 | Edwards | Jan 2005 | A1 |
20050015050 | Mowery et al. | Jan 2005 | A1 |
20050016451 | Edwards | Jan 2005 | A1 |
20050023367 | Reighard et al. | Feb 2005 | A1 |
20050156963 | Song et al. | Jul 2005 | A1 |
20050243112 | Kobayashi et al. | Nov 2005 | A1 |
20060061613 | Fienup et al. | Mar 2006 | A1 |
20060068109 | Frankenberger et al. | Mar 2006 | A1 |
20060146379 | Katagami et al. | Jul 2006 | A1 |
20060238587 | Horsnell | Oct 2006 | A1 |
20060251796 | Fellingham | Nov 2006 | A1 |
20070062383 | Gazeau | Mar 2007 | A1 |
20070292626 | Larsson et al. | Dec 2007 | A1 |
20080271674 | Rademarcher | Nov 2008 | A1 |
20080309698 | Nakano et al. | Dec 2008 | A1 |
20090027433 | Van De Wynckel et al. | Jan 2009 | A1 |
20090029069 | Edwards | Jan 2009 | A1 |
20090117283 | Herre | May 2009 | A1 |
20090181182 | Sloan | Jul 2009 | A1 |
20100132612 | Achrainer | Jun 2010 | A1 |
20100156970 | Ikushima | Jun 2010 | A1 |
20100170918 | Achrainer | Jul 2010 | A1 |
20100225685 | Kwon et al. | Sep 2010 | A1 |
20100279013 | Frankenberger et al. | Nov 2010 | A1 |
20100282283 | Bauer | Nov 2010 | A1 |
20100321448 | Buestgens et al. | Dec 2010 | A1 |
20110014371 | Herre et al. | Jan 2011 | A1 |
20110084150 | Merchant | Apr 2011 | A1 |
20110248046 | Simion | Oct 2011 | A1 |
20110262622 | Herre | Oct 2011 | A1 |
20120085842 | Ciardella | Apr 2012 | A1 |
20120105522 | Wallsten | May 2012 | A1 |
20120114849 | Melcher | May 2012 | A1 |
20120162331 | Kataoka | Jun 2012 | A1 |
20120186518 | Herre | Jul 2012 | A1 |
20120219699 | Pettersson et al. | Aug 2012 | A1 |
20120249679 | Beier et al. | Oct 2012 | A1 |
20120282405 | Herre | Nov 2012 | A1 |
20130201243 | Yoshida | Aug 2013 | A1 |
20130215203 | Chen | Aug 2013 | A1 |
20130257984 | Beier et al. | Oct 2013 | A1 |
20130284833 | Fritz et al. | Oct 2013 | A1 |
20140076985 | Pettersson et al. | Mar 2014 | A1 |
20140242285 | Pettersson et al. | Aug 2014 | A1 |
20140329001 | Rouaud | Nov 2014 | A1 |
20150009254 | Kaiba et al. | Jan 2015 | A1 |
20150042716 | Beier et al. | Feb 2015 | A1 |
20150086723 | Bustgens | Mar 2015 | A1 |
20150098028 | Ohnishi | Apr 2015 | A1 |
20150328654 | Schwab | Nov 2015 | A1 |
20150375258 | Fritz et al. | Dec 2015 | A1 |
20150375507 | Ikushima | Dec 2015 | A1 |
20160052312 | Pitz et al. | Feb 2016 | A1 |
20160074822 | Han | Mar 2016 | A1 |
20160288552 | Ikushima | Oct 2016 | A1 |
20160306364 | Ikushima et al. | Oct 2016 | A1 |
20170087837 | Stefani et al. | Mar 2017 | A1 |
20170106393 | Hamspon et al. | Apr 2017 | A1 |
20170136481 | Fritz et al. | May 2017 | A1 |
20170252765 | Medard | Sep 2017 | A1 |
20170267002 | Pitz et al. | Sep 2017 | A1 |
20170299088 | Rau | Oct 2017 | A1 |
20170361346 | Lahidjanian et al. | Dec 2017 | A1 |
20180022105 | Nakamura et al. | Jan 2018 | A1 |
20180056670 | Kerr | Mar 2018 | A1 |
20180093491 | Murayama et al. | Apr 2018 | A1 |
20180178505 | Stefani et al. | Jun 2018 | A1 |
20180222186 | Stefani et al. | Aug 2018 | A1 |
20180250955 | Herre | Sep 2018 | A1 |
20190091712 | Medard et al. | Mar 2019 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
2287527 | Aug 1998 | CN |
1331661 | Jan 2002 | CN |
1438942 | Aug 2003 | CN |
1512919 | Jul 2004 | CN |
1176815 | Nov 2004 | CN |
1668386 | Sep 2005 | CN |
1761530 | Apr 2006 | CN |
101264698 | Sep 2008 | CN |
101309755 | Nov 2008 | CN |
101657264 | Feb 2010 | CN |
101784348 | Jul 2010 | CN |
102177002 | Sep 2011 | CN |
102198434 | Sep 2011 | CN |
102971080 | Mar 2013 | CN |
103153483 | Jun 2013 | CN |
103909743 | Jul 2014 | CN |
104613205 | May 2015 | CN |
104994966 | Oct 2015 | CN |
105358259 | Feb 2016 | CN |
205042649 | Feb 2016 | CN |
106414081 | Feb 2017 | CN |
1284250 | Nov 1968 | DE |
7710895 | Sep 1977 | DE |
3045401 | Jul 1982 | DE |
3221327 | Sep 1983 | DE |
3225554 | Jan 1984 | DE |
3634747 | Aug 1987 | DE |
3804092 | Sep 1988 | DE |
4013322 | Oct 1991 | DE |
4115111 | Nov 1991 | DE |
4138491 | May 1993 | DE |
9405600 | Jun 1994 | DE |
68924202 | Feb 1996 | DE |
19606716 | Aug 1997 | DE |
19630290 | Jan 1998 | DE |
19731829 | Jan 1999 | DE |
19743804 | Apr 1999 | DE |
9422327 | Mar 2000 | DE |
19852079 | May 2000 | DE |
19936790 | Feb 2001 | DE |
20017629 | Mar 2001 | DE |
10048749 | Apr 2002 | DE |
69429354 | May 2002 | DE |
69622407 | Mar 2003 | DE |
10307719 | Sep 2003 | DE |
60001898 | Feb 2004 | DE |
102004021223 | Dec 2004 | DE |
10331206 | Jan 2005 | DE |
102004034270 | Feb 2006 | DE |
102004044655 | Mar 2006 | DE |
102004049471 | Apr 2006 | DE |
60212523 | Feb 2007 | DE |
69836128 | Aug 2007 | DE |
60125369 | Oct 2007 | DE |
102006021623 | Nov 2007 | DE |
102006056051 | May 2008 | DE |
102007018877 | Oct 2008 | DE |
60132100 | Dec 2008 | DE |
102007037663 | Feb 2009 | DE |
10 2008 018 881 | Sep 2009 | DE |
102008053178 | May 2010 | DE |
102009029946 | Dec 2010 | DE |
102009038462 | Mar 2011 | DE |
102010004496 | Jul 2011 | DE |
102010019612 | Nov 2011 | DE |
102012006371 | Jul 2012 | DE |
102012005087 | Oct 2012 | DE |
102012005650 | Sep 2013 | DE |
102012212469 | Jan 2014 | DE |
102012109123 | Mar 2014 | DE |
202013101134 | Jun 2014 | DE |
102013002412 | Aug 2014 | DE |
102013011107 | Aug 2014 | DE |
102013205171 | Sep 2014 | DE |
102014006991 | Dec 2014 | DE |
102014007523 | Nov 2015 | DE |
102014008183 | Dec 2015 | DE |
10 2014 217 892 | Mar 2016 | DE |
102014012705 | Mar 2016 | DE |
102014013158 | Mar 2016 | DE |
10 2016 014 952 | Jun 2018 | DE |
0138322 | Apr 1985 | EP |
0297309 | Jan 1989 | EP |
0665106 | Aug 1995 | EP |
1120258 | Aug 2001 | EP |
1270086 | Jan 2003 | EP |
1764226 | Mar 2007 | EP |
1852733 | Nov 2007 | EP |
1884365 | Feb 2008 | EP |
1946846 | Jul 2008 | EP |
2002898 | Dec 2008 | EP |
2133154 | Dec 2009 | EP |
2151282 | Feb 2010 | EP |
2196267 | Jun 2010 | EP |
2380744 | Oct 2011 | EP |
2433716 | Mar 2012 | EP |
2468512 | Jun 2012 | EP |
2641661 | Sep 2013 | EP |
2644392 | Oct 2013 | EP |
2777938 | Sep 2014 | EP |
2799150 | Nov 2014 | EP |
2842753 | Mar 2015 | EP |
3002128 | Apr 2016 | EP |
3156138 | Apr 2017 | EP |
3213823 | Sep 2017 | EP |
3257590 | Dec 2017 | EP |
3272669 | Jan 2018 | EP |
3068626 | Oct 2019 | EP |
3010918 | Mar 2015 | FR |
2200433 | Aug 1988 | GB |
2367771 | Apr 2002 | GB |
2507069 | Apr 2014 | GB |
S5722070 | Feb 1982 | JP |
S62116442 | May 1987 | JP |
H04-106669 | Sep 1992 | JP |
H0798171 | Oct 1995 | JP |
H09192583 | Jul 1997 | JP |
2000158670 | Jun 2000 | JP |
2000317354 | Nov 2000 | JP |
2001129456 | May 2001 | JP |
2001157863 | Jun 2001 | JP |
2001239652 | Sep 2001 | JP |
2001300404 | Oct 2001 | JP |
2005501745 | Jan 2002 | JP |
2002361863 | Dec 2002 | JP |
2003506210 | Feb 2003 | JP |
2003136030 | May 2003 | JP |
2003164780 | Jun 2003 | JP |
2004142382 | May 2004 | JP |
2004528956 | Sep 2004 | JP |
2004337710 | Dec 2004 | JP |
2005526234 | Sep 2005 | JP |
2007021760 | Feb 2007 | JP |
2007152666 | Jun 2007 | JP |
2007520340 | Jul 2007 | JP |
2007245633 | Sep 2007 | JP |
2007289848 | Nov 2007 | JP |
2008110332 | May 2008 | JP |
2009006324 | Jan 2009 | JP |
2010528852 | Aug 2010 | JP |
2010531213 | Sep 2010 | JP |
2010531729 | Sep 2010 | JP |
2010241003 | Oct 2010 | JP |
2011206958 | Oct 2011 | JP |
2012011310 | Jan 2012 | JP |
2012506305 | Mar 2012 | JP |
2012135925 | Jul 2012 | JP |
2012206116 | Oct 2012 | JP |
2012228643 | Nov 2012 | JP |
2012228660 | Nov 2012 | JP |
2013067179 | Apr 2013 | JP |
2013530816 | Aug 2013 | JP |
2013530816 | Aug 2013 | JP |
2013188706 | Sep 2013 | JP |
2014019140 | Feb 2014 | JP |
2014050832 | Mar 2014 | JP |
2014111307 | Jun 2014 | JP |
2015-009222 | Jan 2015 | JP |
2015027636 | Feb 2015 | JP |
2015096322 | May 2015 | JP |
2015520011 | Jul 2015 | JP |
2015193129 | Nov 2015 | JP |
2015535735 | Dec 2015 | JP |
2016507372 | Mar 2016 | JP |
2016526910 | Sep 2016 | JP |
2016175077 | Oct 2016 | JP |
2016175662 | Oct 2016 | JP |
2018012065 | Jan 2018 | JP |
2020513311 | May 2020 | JP |
2020513314 | May 2020 | JP |
8601775 | Mar 1986 | WO |
9856585 | Dec 1998 | WO |
02098576 | Dec 2002 | WO |
03021519 | Mar 2003 | WO |
2003062129 | Jul 2003 | WO |
2004048112 | Jun 2004 | WO |
2004085738 | Oct 2004 | WO |
2005016556 | Feb 2005 | WO |
2005075170 | Aug 2005 | WO |
2006022217 | Mar 2006 | WO |
2007121905 | Nov 2007 | WO |
2009019036 | Feb 2009 | WO |
2010046064 | Apr 2010 | WO |
2010146473 | Dec 2010 | WO |
2011044491 | Apr 2011 | WO |
2011128439 | Oct 2011 | WO |
2011138048 | Nov 2011 | WO |
2013121565 | Aug 2013 | WO |
2015071270 | May 2015 | WO |
2015096322 | Jul 2015 | WO |
2015186014 | Dec 2015 | WO |
2016-087016 | Jun 2016 | WO |
2016142510 | Sep 2016 | WO |
2016145000 | Sep 2016 | WO |
2017006245 | Jan 2017 | WO |
2017006246 | Jan 2017 | WO |
2018102846 | Jun 2018 | WO |
2018108565 | Jun 2018 | WO |
Entry |
---|
Chinese Office Action and Search Report for CN201780077603.3 dated Oct. 12, 2020 (15 pages; English translation not available). |
Non-Final Office Action dated Feb. 5, 2021 for U.S. Appl. No. 16/468,701 (80 pages). |
Non-Final Office Action dated Feb. 18, 2021 for U.S. Appl. No. 16/468,692 (97 pages). |
EPO Official Notification of Opposition for Application No. 17821803.8 mailed Feb. 10, 2021 (64 pages; with English machine translation). |
Ghasem, G. et al.; “Chapter 2 Background on Sprays and Their Production”, Industrial Sprays and Atomization: Design, Analysis and Applications, Jan. 1, 2002, Springer, London, pp. 7-33, XP009195118, ISBN: 978-1-4471-3816-7. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion for PCT/EP2017/081141 dated Feb. 26, 2018 (17 pages; with English translation). |
International Search Report and Written Opinion for PCT/EP2017/081114 dated May 15, 2018 (33 pages; with English translation). |
Anonymous: “Roboterkalibrierung—Wikipedia”, Nov. 7, 2016, XP055471615, Gefunden im Internet: URL: https://de.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Roboterkalibrierung&oldid=159460756 [gefunden am Apr. 30, 2018] das ganze dockument (8 pages; with English translation). |
Beyer, Lukas: “Genauigkeitssteigerung von Industrierobotern”, Forschungsberichte Aus Dem Laboratorium Fertigungstechnik/Helmut-Schmidt-Universitat, Universitat Der Bundeswehr Hamburg, Dec. 31, 2005, Seiten 1-4, XP009505118; ISSN: 1860-2886; ISBN: 978-3-8322-3681-6 (13 pages; with English machine translation). |
International Search Report and Written Opinion for PCT/EP2017/081108 dated Feb. 28, 2018 (with English translation; 18 pages). |
International Search Report and Written Opinion for PCT/EP2017/081099 dated Feb. 26, 2018 (21 pages; with English translation). |
International Search Report and Written Opinion for PCT/EP2017/081102 dated Mar. 14, 2018 (16 pages; with English translation). |
International Search Report and Written Opinion for PCT/EP2017/081105 dated Feb. 26, 2018 (19 pages; with English translation). |
International Search Report and Written Opinion for PCT/EP2017/081152 dated May 15, 2018 (25 pages; with English translation). |
International Search Report and Written Opinion for PCT/EP2017/081098 dated May 14, 2018 (26 pages; with English translation). |
International Search Report and Written Opinion for PCT/EP2017/081101 dated Feb. 28, 2018 (14 pages; with English translation). |
International Search Report and Written Opinion for PCT/EP2017/081121 dated Feb. 26, 2018 (20 pages; with English translation). |
International Search Report and Written Opinion for PCT/EP2017/081117 dated Mar. 12, 2018 (27 pages; with English translation). |
International Search Report and Written Opinion for PCT/EP2017/081123 dated Feb. 26, 2018 (20 pages; with English translation). |
EPO Examination Report for Application No. 201702818.1 dated Dec. 18, 2020 (with English machine translation; 6 pages). |
Chinese Office Action for Application No. CN20178007017.9 dated Aug. 31, 2020 (8 pages; with English translation). |
Non Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 16/468,697 dated Oct. 22, 2020 (78 pages). |
Non Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 16/468,696 dated Nov. 2, 2020 (58 pages). |
Non Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 16/468,689 dated Oct. 15, 2020 (77 pages). |
Chinese Office Action for CN201780077476.7 dated Sep. 23, 2020 (12 pages; English translation not available). |
Non Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 16/468,700 dated Dec. 1, 2020 (73 pages). |
JPO Submission for JP2019-531096; submitted Dec. 21, 2020 (32 pages; with English translation). |
JPO Submission for JP2019-531957; submitted Dec. 21, 2020 (21 pages; with English translation). |
Non-Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 16/468,691 dated Jan. 7, 2021 (79 pages). |
European Search Report for EP20170638.9 dated Sep. 14, 2020 (4 pages—English translation not available). |
European Search Report for EP20170021.8 dated Sep. 8, 2020 (11 pages—English translation not available). |
European Search Report for EP20170025.9 dated Sep. 9, 2020 (4 pages—English translation not available). |
European Search Report for EP20170016.8 dated Sep. 7, 2020 (4 pages—English translation not available). |
China National Intellectual Property Administration Office Action and Search Report for CN Application No. 201780077018.3 dated Aug. 27, 2020 (11 pages; Search Report in English). |
Final Office Action dated Mar. 19, 2021 for U.S. Appl. No. 16/468,696 (45 pages). |
Final Office Action dated Jun. 11, 2021 for U.S. Appl. No. 16/468,701 (53 pages). |
Notification of Reasons for Refusal for Application No. JP2019-532012 dated Jun. 22, 2021 (6 pages; with English machine translation). |
Notification of Reasons for Refusal for Application No. JP2019-527330 dated Jun. 22, 2021 (10 pages; with English machine translation). |
JPO Office Action dated Jul. 3, 2021 for Application No. JP2019-532024 (12 pages; with English machine translation). |
Non-Final Office Action dated Aug. 27, 2021 for U.S. Appl. No. 16/468,695 (149 pages). |
Final Office Action dated Apr. 19, 2021 for U.S. Appl. No. 16/468,700 (62 pages). |
Japenese Patent Office Notice of Reasons of Refusal for Application No. JP 2019-531967 dated Jun. 8, 2021 (8 pages; with English machine translation). |
Notice of Allowance mailed in U.S. Appl. No. 16/468,689 dated Jun. 2, 2021 (38 pages). |
JPO Notification of Reasons for Rejection for Application No. JP2019-532030 dated May 18, 2021 (6 pages; with English translation). |
CIPO Office Action for Application No. CN201780077474.8 dated Apr. 26, 2021 (17 pages; with English translation). |
Chinese Office Action dated Jun. 2, 2021 for Application No. CN201780077017.9 (17 pages; with English machine translation). |
Japanese Notification of Reasons for Rejection dated Jun. 1, 2021 for Application No. JP2019-531944 (14 pages; with English machine translation). |
Japanese Notification of Reasons for Rejection dated Jun. 8, 2021 for Application No. JP2019-531957 (13 pages; with English machine translation). |
Supplemental Notice of Allowability dated Jul. 8, 2021 for U.S. Appl. No. 16/468,696 (11 pages). |
Liptak, Bela. (2006). Instrument Engineers' Handbook (4th Edition)—Process Control and Optimization, vol. 2—2.1.3.5 Process Time Constant, (pp. 99-102). Taylor & Francis. Retrieved from https://app.knovel.eom/hotlink/pdf/id:kt00CC7HL1/instrument-engineers/process-time-constant (Year: 2006). |
Fianl Office Action dated May 13, 2021 for U.S. Appl. No. 16/468,691 (70 pages). |
JPO Office Action for Application No. JP2019-531097 dated Jun. 29, 2021 (10 pages; with English machine translation). |
JPO Office Action for Application No. 2019-531096 dated Jul. 6, 2021 (9 pages; with English machine translation). |
JPO Office Action for Application No. 2019-531098 dated Jul. 6, 2021 (5 pages; English translation only). |
JPO Office Action for Application No. 2019-531459 dated Jul. 6, 2021 (8 pages; with English machine translation). |
JPO Decision to Grant dated Oct. 3, 2021 for Application No. JP2019-532113 (7 pages; with English machine translation). |
Final Office Action dated Oct. 7, 2021 for U.S. Appl. No. 16/468,693 (58 pages). |
Non Final Office Action dated Nov. 23, 2021 for U.S. Appl. No. 16/468,694 (163 pages). |
Chinese Office Action in related application No. CN201780077045.0 dated Jan. 29, 2022 (17 pages; English machine translation provided). |
JPO Decision to Grant in related application No. JP2019-532030 dated Dec. 1, 2022 (6 pages; English machine translation provided). |
Non-Final Office Action dated Jan. 6, 2022 for related U.S. Appl. No. 16/468,701 (36 pages). |
JPO Decision to Grant in related application JP2019-532012 dated Jan. 25, 2022 (6 pages; with English machine translation). |
Non-Final Office Action for related U.S. Appl. No. 16/468,699 dated Mar. 9, 2022 (180 pages). |
EPO Notification of Objection dated May 18, 2022 for related Patent No. EP3718643 (55 pages; with English machine translation). |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20200078813 A1 | Mar 2020 | US |