Coating formulations for scoring or cutting balloon catheters

Information

  • Patent Grant
  • 10314947
  • Patent Number
    10,314,947
  • Date Filed
    Monday, July 31, 2017
    6 years ago
  • Date Issued
    Tuesday, June 11, 2019
    4 years ago
Abstract
The present invention is related to scoring or cutting balloon catheters carrying at least on a portion of their surface at least one drug or drug preparation and at least one lipophilic antioxidant at a ratio of 3-100% by weight of the at least one lipophilic antioxidant in relation to 100% by weight of the drug, wherein a combination of the at least one drug being a limus drug and the at least one lipophilic antioxidant being butylated hydroxytoluene is excluded.
Description
BACKGROUND
1. Field of the Invention

The invention relates to the transfer of a drug loosely adhering to the surface of a scoring or cutting balloon catheter to a site inside the body, usually in a diseased blood vessel. The preferred application is local drug therapy during percutaneous transluminal angioplasty (PTA) or percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty (PTCA). The interventions are performed to restore blood flow in stenotic or occluded blood vessels, usually into arteries. A catheter is introduced in a major artery. At the distal end the catheter carries a cylindrical balloon in folded state with very small diameter and additional tools or structures which scratch or cut the luminal surface of the treated blood vessel or tissue. In the folded state the balloon can enter or pass the stenotic or occluded segment of e.g. a blood vessel. Once positioned in the narrowed segment, the balloon is inflated to enlarge the lumen of the blood vessel to its original diameter. Simultaneously, a drug may be transferred to the vessel wall to prevent early and late re-narrowing due to hyperproliferation of the injured vessel wall.


Medical devices may contain drugs either to improve the tolerance, efficacy or in vivo life-time of the device or the device serves as carrier for the drug. In any case the dosedensity (e g. mg drug/mg device or mg drug/mm2 device surface), chemical stability, adherence, release rate, and total amount released are important and frequently critical features of the drug formulation. These properties are the more critical the more the requirements during production and application of the device vary or may even be contradictory. Drug-coated angioplasty catheters are typical examples: the drug coating must adhere firmly to tolerate mechanical stress during production including folding of balloons, crimping of stents, packaging, transportation to customers, and during final application, which involves the passage through a narrow hemostatic valve, an introductory sheath or guiding catheter and a variable distance through possibly tortuous and narrow blood vessels. When the balloon is inflated the drug should be released within a minute or less as rapidly and as completely as possible. The problem was demonstrated by Cremers et al. (Cremers B, Biedermann M, Mahnkopf D, Bohm M, Scheller B. Comparison of two different paclitaxel-coated balloon catheters in the porcine coronary restenosis model. Clin Res Cardiol 2009; 98:325-330) who retrieved as much as 50% of the dose from balloons after expansion for one minute in coronary arteries of pigs, whereas other catheters coated with the same drug and dose but in a different formulation released more than 95%. Almost perfect results (i.e., loss of only 10% of dose and residual drug on the balloon after expansion in an artery of about 10%) were achieved with a rigid prototype balloon (Scheller B, Speck U, Abramjuk C, Bernhardt U, Bohm M, Nickenig G. Paclitaxel balloon coating—a novel method for prevention and therapy of restenosis. Circulation 2004; 110: 810-814). The application of the same coating composition to more flexible modern balloon catheters resulted in problems, i.e., larger premature loss of the drug. The coating of scoring or cutting balloons with drugs in a reliable way with a dose which sufficient to be efficacious imposes additional problems because of the more complex structure of the device and the more complex production process.


2. Prior Art

Protection from premature drug release. Premature release of a drug from a balloon is a major problem which has been addressed by a variety of methods. Some of them are mechanical, e.g. the use of protection tubes, sleeves, envelops. Examples are U.S. Pat. Nos. 5,370,614, 6,306,166, and 6,616,650 disclosing various protective sheaths which are retracted before the balloon is inflated, or U.S. Pat. No. 6,419,692 proposing a cover which bursts during balloon expansion. A different approach is taken in U.S. Pat. No. 5,893,840 disclosing structured balloon membranes with tiny cavities, WO 94/23787 with roughened balloon membranes to enhance the adherence of coating, or more recently U.S. Pat. No. 7,108,684 proposing a pouch which protects the drug-containing layer on the balloon and WO 2009/066330 disclosing methods placing the drug selectively under the folds of a folded balloon. Although efficacious these methods have the disadvantage of increasing the complexity and cost of production or make handling of the devices more difficult or add to the diameter of the devices (which must be kept as small as possible to facilitate passage through stenotic lesions). In some embodiments the protective membranes or perforated membranes interfere with the scoring components of the balloons or prevent a homogeneous transfer of the drug to the tissue or even put the patient at risk. None of these methods has been applied to scoring or cutting balloons and nothing is known about problems which will arise from the increasing complexity and mechanical problems arising from a disturbance of the protecting envelops by the scoring or cutting structures and vice-versa.


Other approaches use either physical or chemical methods to control the release of drugs from a balloon surface, e.g. U.S. Pat. No. 5,304,121 describes a hydrogel which releases the drug only after exposure to a triggering agent; U.S. Pat. No. 5,199,951 relies on thermal activation; according to U.S. Pat. No. 7,445,792 a lipophilic ‘hydration inhibitor’ protects water-soluble drugs from premature release; and according to U.S. Pat. No. 5,370,614 a viscous matrix protects the drug from premature release, however, the viscous matrix must be protected by a sheath during the passage to the stenotic vessel segment. None of the methods has been tested in practice and proven to fulfill the requirements for fast, reliable and complete drug transfer to the target tissue. None of the methods has been designed to be used with scoring or cutting balloons.


Numerous methods of sustained drug release are known and successfully used in practice but are not applicable to medical devices which are in contact with the target tissue for only a few seconds or minutes. Sustained drug release is usually achieved by embedding the drug in a polymer which restricts the diffusion rate to the surface and in this way controls the transfer into the adjacent tissue.


Therefore, a need remains for a method or formulation which protects the coating from premature losses during production, handling, and on the way to the lesion and still allows the immediate and complete release of the active ingredient at a location and point in time determined by the user. During the production process this problem is even more severe for scoring and cutting balloons because of the more complex structure of the product. Scoring and cutting balloons have merits in the treatment of certain lesions, e.g. if the conventional smooth balloons tend to dislocate during inflation or if a controlled and predetermined injury of the vessel wall is preferred to an uncontrolled dissection during balloon inflation. Nevertheless, the problem of renarrowing of the vessel lumen due to excessive neointimal proliferation as a reaction to the unavoidable injury during dilatation is the same as with conventional balloon catheters.


An advantageous way to control adherence and release of a drug from a medical device, e.g., an angioplasty balloon, is the selection of a suitable formulation and coating which do not require mechanical protection, or additional physical or chemical interaction with the coating except the usual operation of the device e.g. inflation of a folded balloon to induce the release of the drug. Although desirable and frequently tried, the conflicting objectives of perfect adherence during production and before use and immediate release at the site of action make it a difficult task. A large variety of patent applications vaguely disclose measures, compositions and devices to solve this problem for conventional balloon catheters either by the selection of drugs, the choice of specific coating processes or formulations containing various additives. Long lists of compounds have been copied from textbooks of chemistry, pharmacology, or pharmacy but even with extensive experimentation disclosures are not sufficiently clear to allow a person familiar with the subject and skilled in the art to come to a satisfactory solution without an inventive step. Examples of prior art are US 2008/0118544 reciting an excessive number of substances and substance classes or U.S. Pat. No. 7,445,795 which discloses the use of hydration inhibitors' not applicable to the preferred class of very lipophilic drugs which require ‘hydration enhancers’ as e.g. disclosed in WO 2004/028582. Although the hydrophilic additives (which may be regarded as ‘hydration enhancer’) work quite well on certain conventional balloon membranes (Scheller B, Speck U, Abramjuk C, Bernhardt U, Bohm M, Nickenig G. Pa-clitaxel balloon coating—a novel method for prevention and therapy of restenosis. Circulation 2004; 110: 810-814) the adherence to various modern conventional or scoring PTA or PTCA balloons is either too weak or too tight resulting in premature loss of a major proportion of the drug or incomplete release at the target site. None of the known compositions has been tried on scoring or cutting balloon catheters.


Prior Art: Antioxidants.


In theory, antioxidants address an almost universal feature of diseased tissue, namely the Reactive oxygen species', and should have widespread medical applications. In practice, only very few controlled clinical trials have shown beneficial effects of antioxidants (Suzuki K. Antioxidants for therapeutic use: Why are only a few drugs in clinical use?Advanced Drug Delivery Reviews 2009; 61:287-289). Antioxidants are mentioned as potentially useful drugs for the treatment of focal vascular disease such as stenosis, restenosis, atherosclerotic plaques, and vulnerable plaques in US 2009/0136560 with no additive, in U.S. Pat. No. 5,571,523 as agents inducing apoptosis in vascular smooth muscle cells, in WO 2004/022124 either as active drugs or as ‘hydration inhibitors’. In US 2008/0241215 probucol, a drug approved for the treatment of hyperlipidemia, a known risk factor for atheriosclerosis, is proposed as the active ingredient in stent coating, either alone or combined with rapamycin or another anti-restenotic agent in a slow-release formulation. None of the above-mentioned documents contains data encouraging the use as additives to a lipophilic drug to delay the release rate of the drug and no specific compositions are disclosed which address the above-mentioned problems of adhesion of a drug before the target lesion is reached and immediate release when required.


Small proportions of antioxidants are commonly used to protect drugs or nutrients from decomposition by oxygen or oxidation, an application which has also been proposed for drugs coated on implantable medical devices such as stents (US 2007/0020380, US 2009/0246253) or balloon catheters (US 2009/0246252, especially paragraph [105]). However, antioxidants are commonly used in proportions of less than 1% by weight in relation to 100% by weight of the drug. Normally it is intended to use as less antioxidant as possible, i.e., less than 0.1% by weight in relation to 100% by weight of the drug (Voigt R. Lehrbuch der pharmazeutischen Technologie. 5. Edition, Verlag Chemie, Weinheim—Deer-field Beach, Fla.—Basel, 1984).


Present Invention.


The problem underlying the present invention was the provision of a scoring or cutting balloon catheter with an improved adherence of the drug without negative effect on the release of the drug at the target site.


The problem was solved by a scoring or cutting balloon catheter according to claim 1. In other words, the problem was solved by a scoring or cutting balloon catheter carrying at least on a portion of its surface at least one drug or drug preparation and at least one lipophilic antioxidant at a ratio of 3-100% by weight of the at least one lipophilic antioxidant in relation to 100% by weight of the drug, wherein a combination of limus drugs with butylated hydroxytoluene as the lipophilic antioxidant is excluded. Preferred embodiments are disclosed in the dependant claims.


During testing of a large variety of coating methods, additives and drug combinations the surprising discovery was made that certain lipophilic antioxidants added to even more lipophilic and less water soluble drugs in a defined mass ratio significantly increase the adherence of the drug to scoring and cutting balloons during handling and on the way to the target lesion even if the target lesion is located far away from the site where the device first enters a blood-filled introductory sheath, guiding catheter or vessel containing rapidly flowing blood. This was also tested with scoring balloons. In spite of the additional mechanical stress (as compared to conventional balloons) imposed on the coating due the movement of the scoring wires surrounding the folded balloons the loss of the drug during the passage through a narrow hemostatic valve and a 3 curved guiding catheter was very low. Thus, at least one lipophilic antioxidant in an amount of 3-100% by weight is used as an adherence improver for drugs coated on a scoring or cutting balloon catheter. The wording “at least one lipophilic antioxidant” means that single antioxidants but also mixtures of different antioxidants are included.


Preferred examples of active drugs are inhibitors of cell proliferation, preferably taxanes such as paclitaxel, do-cetaxel and protaxel, immunosuppressants belonging to the class of substances binding to the mammalian target of ra-pamycin (mTOR), i.e., mTOR inhibitors such as sirolimus, everolimus, zotarolimus, biolimus and temsirolimus, most preferred is sirolimus, referred to as limus-drugs. Alternatively, specific inhibitors of neovascularization such as thalidomide, statins like atorvastatin, cerivastatin, flu-vastatin or anti-inflammatory drugs like corticoids or even more preferred lipophilic derivatives of corticoids such as betamethasone diproprionate or dexamethasone-21-palmitate. Various drugs may be applied or combined if different pharmacological actions are required or efficacy or tolerance is to be improved. Thus, the wording “at least one drug or drug preparation” means that single drugs but also mixtures of different drugs are included. Preferred drugs are either lipophilic (partition coefficient between n-butanol and water >10, or display very poor water solubility (<1 mg/ml, 20° C.).


Preferred additives to the active drugs are lipophilic antioxidants, particularly preferred are antioxidants which are solid at temperatures up to 40° C. Preferred are buty-lated hydroxytoluene, butylated hydroxyanisole, nordihy-droguaiaretic acid, propyl gallate and ascorbyl palmitate. Probucol is not a preferred additive. The combination of mTOR-binding limus-drugs with butylated hydroxytoluene is excluded as already mentioned above. This applies to combinations of the single drug with the single antioxidant as well as to combinations of butylated hydroxytoluene with mixtures consisting of different Limus drugs.


Lipophilic antioxidant means that the partition coefficient of the antioxidant between n-butanol and water is >1, more preferred >10 and even more preferred >100.


Preferably, the drug is more lipophilic than the antioxidant, i.e., the partition coefficient between n-butanol and water of the drug is higher than the partition coefficient between n-butanol and water of the antioxidant.


At the dose density used the chosen antioxidants do not display relevant therapeutic or prophylactic effects in respect of the disease which is treated by the coated medical device nor is the relative amount of the antioxidant chosen to protect the drug from oxidative decomposition. The dose density and the mass relation of the antioxidant to the drug are solely optimized in respect of adherence of the drug to and release from the medical device surface. The antioxidant dose on the medical device is too low to provide the desired pharmacological effect, i.e., it is ineffective on its own. The antioxidant on the medical device is not required to protect the active drug (e.g., the antiproliferative drug) from oxidative decomposition during production, sterilization and storage; at least it is not required at the dose or concentration applied according to this invention. ‘Not required’ means that the active drug is stable enough without the antioxidant or at an antioxidant dose or dose density or ratio to the active drug below the dose according to the present invention. ‘Sufficient stability’ means that less than 5% of the active drug is lost due to oxidative decomposition between the coating of the device and the use in patients one year after production if stored at ambient temperature (=drug or drug preparation stable against oxidative decomposition).


The dose of the antioxidant on the surface of a medical device may be defined in respect of the therapeutic drug. Preferred relationships (weight/weight) are 3-100% antioxidant of the weight of the drug. For example, if the dose density of the drug is 5 μg/mm2 device surface, the amount of antioxidant is 0.15-5.0 μg/mm2. Higher proportions of the antioxidant may be selected if either the drug is applied at a dose below 3 μg/mm2 device surface or the adherence of the drug to the device surface is further improved. The antioxidant load of the device may reach 10 μg/mm2. A higher load is possible. Other preferred ranges for the relationship of antioxidant to drug on a weight/weight basis are 5-100%, more preferred 10-100%, and even more preferred 20-100% in relation to 100% of the drug. The relationship may also be defined in respect of moles in a preferred embodiment the antioxidant is present from 10 mole % relative to the drug to 200 mole %. Higher amounts of the antioxidant may be useful; they are only excluded if they display on their own significant pharmacological prophylactic or therapeutic effects in respect of the disease to be treated application of the same coating composition to more flexible modern balloon catheters resulted in problems, i.e., larger premature loss of the drug. The coating of scoring or cutting balloons with drugs in a reliable way with a dose which is sufficient to be efficacious imposes additional problems because of the more complex structure of the device and the more complex production process.


If more than one drug is used the total weight of the drugs or the total moles of the drugs serve as basis for the calculation of the amount of the antioxidant. If more than one antioxidant is used the total weight of the antioxidants or the total moles of the antioxidants serve as basis for the calculation of the amount of the antioxidants.


Polymer-free coating compositions are preferred. It is a special advantage of the present compositions that they do not require the use of polymers to prevent premature release of the drug.


Usually, drugs and mixtures of drugs with additives are coated on medical devices as liquid formulations in volatile solvents. The choice of solvent is important for the distribution of the drug on the device, especially if the device is coated at an advanced stage of production. An advanced stage of production of a scoring or cutting balloon may include the scoring or cutting elements of the device, the structures required to fix these elements and an already folded balloon. The solvents further determine the structure of the coating in dry state and the adherence and release of the drug from the surface. Preferred organic solvents are acetone, tetrahydrofuran, and various alcohols such as methanol and ethanol. Usually, 1 to 30% (volume/volume) water is added. The drug or drugs and the antioxidant may be applied at the same time dissolved in the same solvent or mixture of solvents. Alternatively, they may be separately dissolved in the same or different solvents and sequentially applied. In a preferred embodiment, the scoring or cutting balloon catheter has been coated with at least one drug and at least one antioxidant both together ore each separately dissolved in tetrahydrofuran or a mixture of solvents containing more than 25% (v/v) tetrahydrofuran. Another preferred embodiment is based on a scoring or cutting balloon catheter, which has been coated with at least one drug and at least one antioxidant both together or each separately dissolved in acetone or a mixture of solvents containing more than 25% (v/v) acetone. Coating with dry particles such as micro- or nanoparticles, crystals, capsules etc. or particles suspended in a liquid preparation is possible. Coating with particles may be facilitated by a roughened or sticky surface of the medical device.


A variety of coating procedures providing more or less uniform layers on medical devices are known from the literature and are disclosed in patent applications. These include simple dipping, spraying, and methods providing precise doses and homogeneous distributions (e.g., WO 2009/018816). Coating may be applied stepwise, either as multiple layers of the same composition or as layers with different compositions e.g. the drug first and the antioxidant second or in the opposite order. All these methods may be applied to the formulations of the current invention. Furthermore, coated medical devices may be dried under different conditions such as temperature, air flow, gas composition, and pressure at different stages of the production process. They may be stored in water-vapor-tight seals with a separately packed water absorbing-agent within the seal.


Subject of the current invention are scoring or cutting balloon catheters, e.g., catheters for angioplasty or coronary angioplasty. Preferred are scoring or cutting balloon catheters for short-lasting use during an interventional image guided therapy. Short lasting use means that the device is not implanted but eliminated from the body when the procedure is finished, usually within less than 10 minutes, but never later than a few, preferably 5, hours after the end of the procedure. Catheters may contain balloon membranes made from various polymers and copolymers, polyam-ides (nylon 12, pebax), polyethylenes, polyurethanes, various polyvinyls and the like. Independently of the type of material, the adherence and release properties of drugs are improved by the addition of lipophilic antioxidants. Furthermore, catheters comprise elements which are aimed at scoring or cutting the surfaces in direct contact with the inflated balloons, e.g. wires with various profiles, or protrusions of the balloon surface.


The scoring or cutting balloon catheter carries the at least one drug or drug preparation and the at least one lipophilic antioxidant at least on a portion of its surface which is aimed at coming into close contact with the tissue to be treated, e.g., the balloon at the distal portion of a catheter shaft. This means that at least 5%, preferably more than 50%, most preferably more than 90% of the surface is coated. The balloon of a scoring or cutting balloon catheter has a central cylindrical part and two opposite conical ends. If less than 100% of the balloon catheter's surface is coated, it is preferred that the cylindrical part is coated and that at least parts of or the complete conical ends remain uncoated.


Below, the invention is described by means of Examples.







EXAMPLE 1

Balloons for percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty type A (AngioSculpt 3.5-20 mm, AngioScore, Inc., Fremont Calif., USA were coated either with paclitaxel alone or combined with iopromide (iodinated contrast agent according to WO 02/076509) or different amounts of butylated hydroxy-toluene (BHT); solvent:acetone/ethanol/H2O. Coated balloons were tested in respect of paclitaxel loss during the passage through a hemostatic valve, Medtronic Launcher JL 3.5 6F guiding catheter and one minute in stirred blood (37° C.). When admixed at sufficient concentration to the coating solution, BHT improved the adhesion of paclitaxel.



















Loss on the way




Catheter
to the lesion



Coating solution
labeling
% of dose




















No additive
1
24




2
40



Iopromide as an additive;
3
49



ca. 0.5 mg/mg paclitaxel
4
34



BHT 5%-0.05 mg BHT/mg
5
15



paclitaxel
6
26



BHT 24%-0.24 mg BHT/mg
7
10



paclitaxel
8
6










EXAMPLE 2

Balloons for percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty type A were coated either with paclitaxel alone or combined with iopromide (iodinated contrast agent according to WO 02/076509), see example 2, or butylated hydroxytoluene (BHT) or nordihydroguaj arctic acid. Coated balloons were tested in respect of paclitaxel loss during the passage through a hemostatic valve, a Medtronic Launcher JL 3.5 6F guiding catheter and in stirred blood (37° C.) for one minute. When admixed at sufficient concentration to the coating solution, lipophilic antioxidants improve the adhesion of paclitaxel whereas the release during balloon inflation in a coronary artery (determined in separate experiments) was not impaired.

















Loss on
Residual




the way to
paclitaxel




the lesion
on balloons


Coating solution
Labeling
% of dose
% of dose


















No additive
Control
32
no data


acetone/ethanol/H2O
1, 2




Iopromide as an additive
Control
42
~10


ca. 0.5 mg/mg paclitaxel;
3, 4




acetone/ethanol/H2O





BHT 24% = 0.24 mg BHT/mg
A
15.3 ± 9.5 
11


paclitaxel, acetone/ethanol/H2O





BHT 24% = 0.24 mg BHT/mg
B
3.4 ± 4.8
13


paclitaxel; tetrahydrofuran/





ethanol/H2O





Nordihydroguaiaretic acid
C
4.2 ± 7.2
no data


35% = 0.35 mg/mg paclitaxel;





acetone/ethanol/H2O








Claims
  • 1. A method for performing angioplasty, comprising: providing a balloon catheter, the balloon catheter comprising: a shaft having a proximal portion and a distal portion;an inflatable balloon coupled to the distal portion of the shaft;a nonimplantable scoring structure surrounding the balloon;a coating composition carried on at least a portion of a surface of the balloon catheter, the coating composition comprising at least one drug and at least one lipophilic antioxidant, the coating composition being 3-100% by weight of the at least one drug, wherein the at least one drug is selected from the group consisting of a Limus drug, a cell proliferation inhibitor, and an inhibitor of neovascularization, wherein the at least one lipophilic antioxidant is selected from the group consisting of butylated hydroxytoluene, butylated hydroxyanisole, nordihydroguaiaretic acid, ascorbyl palmitate, and propyl gallate, wherein a combination of a Limus drug with butylated hydroxytoluene as the lipophilic antioxidant is excluded;moving the inflatable balloon, nonimplantable scoring structure, and coating composition toward an angioplasty site, the at least one lipophilic antioxidant protecting the at least one drug from premature loss when moving toward the angioplasty site; andinflating the inflatable balloon to cause the scoring structure to score a luminal surface of a blood vessel at the angioplasty site and deliver the at least one drug to the angioplasty site.
  • 2. The method according to claim 1, wherein the scoring structure comprises one or more wires, and inflating the inflatable balloon causes the one or more wires to score the luminal surface of the blood vessel.
  • 3. The method according to claim 1, wherein the at least one drug comprises an oxidation-insensitive taxane selected from the group consisting of paclitaxel, protaxel and docetaxel.
  • 4. The method according to claim 3, wherein the at least one lipophilic antioxidant is nordihydroguaiaretic acid.
  • 5. The method according to claim 3, wherein the oxidation-insensitive taxane is oxidation-insensitive paclitaxel.
  • 6. The method according to claim 5, wherein the at least one lipophilic antioxidant is nordihydroguaiaretic acid.
  • 7. The method according to claim 1, wherein the at least one lipophilic antioxidant is nordihydroguaiaretic acid.
  • 8. The method according to claim 1, wherein the at least one antioxidant load is up to 10 μg/mm2 of coated catheter surface.
  • 9. The method according to claim 8, wherein the at least one lipophilic antioxidant is nordihydroguaiaretic acid.
  • 10. The method according to claim 1, wherein the at least one lipophilic antioxidant is contained at a ratio of 5-100% by weight, in relation to 100% by weight of the at least one drug.
  • 11. The method according to claim 10, wherein the at least one lipophilic antioxidant is nordihydroguaiaretic acid and the at least drug comprises oxidation-insensitive paclitaxel.
  • 12. The method according to claim 1, wherein the at least one lipophilic antioxidant is contained at a ratio of 10-100% by weight, in relation to 100% by weight of the at least one drug.
  • 13. The method according to claim 12, wherein the at least one lipophilic antioxidant is nordihydroguaiaretic acid and the at least drug comprises oxidation-insensitive paclitaxel.
  • 14. The method according to claim 1, wherein the at least one lipophilic antioxidant is contained at a ratio of 20-100% by weight, in relation to 100% by weight of the at least one drug.
  • 15. The method according to claim 14, wherein the at least one lipophilic antioxidant is nordihydroguaiaretic acid and the at least drug comprises oxidation-insensitive paclitaxel.
  • 16. The method according to claim 1, wherein the at least one lipophilic antioxidant is contained at a ratio of 50-100% by weight, in relation to 100% by weight of the at least one drug.
  • 17. The method according to claim 16, wherein the at least one lipophilic antioxidant is nordihydroguaiaretic acid and the at least drug comprises oxidation-insensitive paclitaxel.
  • 18. The method according to claim 1, wherein the balloon catheter further comprises a coating composition including the therapeutically effective amount of at least one drug and an amount of at least one lipophilic antioxidant, wherein the coating composition is polymer-free.
  • 19. The method according to claim 18, wherein the at least one lipophilic antioxidant is nordihydroguaiaretic acid and the at least drug comprises oxidation-insensitive paclitaxel.
Priority Claims (1)
Number Date Country Kind
10160347 Apr 2010 EP regional
CROSS REFERENCE TO RELATED APPLICATIONS

This application is a continuation of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 14/877,284, filed Oct. 7, 2015, and issued as U.S. Pat. No. 9,770,536, which is a continuation of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 13/628,627, filed Sep. 27, 2012, and issued as U.S. Pat. No. 9,173,977, which is a continuation of PCT Application No. PCT/EP2011/056179, filed Apr. 18, 2011, which claims the benefit of EP Application No. 10160347.0, filed Apr. 19, 2010, the full disclosures of each of which are incorporated herein by reference in their entirety.

US Referenced Citations (481)
Number Name Date Kind
2701559 Cooper Feb 1955 A
2854983 Baskin Oct 1958 A
3045677 Wallace Jul 1962 A
3467101 Fogarty et al. Sep 1969 A
3825013 Craven Jul 1974 A
4327736 Inoue May 1982 A
4456011 Warnecke Jun 1984 A
4483340 Fogarty et al. Nov 1984 A
4578061 Lemelson Mar 1986 A
4604762 Robinson Aug 1986 A
4637396 Cook Jan 1987 A
4649922 Wiktor Mar 1987 A
4723549 Wholey et al. Feb 1988 A
4796629 Grayzel Jan 1989 A
4838853 Parisi Jun 1989 A
4887613 Farr et al. Dec 1989 A
4895166 Farr et al. Jan 1990 A
4921484 Hillstead May 1990 A
4942788 Farr et al. Jul 1990 A
4950277 Farr Aug 1990 A
4956830 Mock et al. Sep 1990 A
4966604 Reiss Oct 1990 A
4969458 Wiktor Nov 1990 A
4976711 Parins et al. Dec 1990 A
4986807 Farr Jan 1991 A
4986830 Owens et al. Jan 1991 A
4998539 Delsanti Mar 1991 A
5003918 Olson et al. Apr 1991 A
5019088 Farr May 1991 A
5019089 Farr May 1991 A
5026384 Farr et al. Jun 1991 A
5062384 Foley et al. Nov 1991 A
5062648 Gomringer Nov 1991 A
5071407 Termin et al. Dec 1991 A
5098440 Hillstead Mar 1992 A
5100386 Inoue Mar 1992 A
5100423 Fearnot Mar 1992 A
5101682 Radisch et al. Apr 1992 A
5102402 Dror et al. Apr 1992 A
5102417 Palmaz Apr 1992 A
5108416 Ryan et al. Apr 1992 A
5112345 Farr May 1992 A
5116318 Hillstead May 1992 A
5120322 Davis et al. Jun 1992 A
5133732 Wiktor Jul 1992 A
5176693 Pannek et al. Jan 1993 A
5181911 Shturman Jan 1993 A
5190058 Jones et al. Mar 1993 A
5192291 Pannek et al. Mar 1993 A
5196024 Barath Mar 1993 A
5199951 Spears Apr 1993 A
5209727 Radisch et al. May 1993 A
5221261 Termin et al. Jun 1993 A
5221727 Kumpf et al. Jun 1993 A
5222971 Willard et al. Jun 1993 A
5224945 Pannek et al. Jul 1993 A
5224949 Gomringer et al. Jul 1993 A
5226887 Farr et al. Jul 1993 A
5243997 Uflacker et al. Sep 1993 A
5263963 Garrison et al. Nov 1993 A
5295493 Radisch et al. Mar 1994 A
5295959 Gurbel et al. Mar 1994 A
5304121 Sahatjian Apr 1994 A
5306250 March et al. Apr 1994 A
5308354 Zacca et al. May 1994 A
5308356 Blackshear, Jr. et al. May 1994 A
5318576 Plassche et al. Jun 1994 A
5320634 Vigil et al. Jun 1994 A
5336178 Kaplan et al. Aug 1994 A
5336234 Vigil et al. Aug 1994 A
5344401 Radisch et al. Sep 1994 A
5344419 Spears Sep 1994 A
5350101 Godlewski Sep 1994 A
5354279 Hofling Oct 1994 A
5370614 Amundson et al. Dec 1994 A
5376077 Gomringer Dec 1994 A
5419777 Hofling May 1995 A
5423745 Todd et al. Jun 1995 A
5443078 Uflacker Aug 1995 A
5443446 Shturman Aug 1995 A
5443496 Schwartz et al. Aug 1995 A
5449372 Schmaltz et al. Sep 1995 A
5449373 Pinchasik et al. Sep 1995 A
5456666 Campbell et al. Oct 1995 A
5456667 Ham et al. Oct 1995 A
5458568 Racchini et al. Oct 1995 A
5460607 Miyata et al. Oct 1995 A
5470314 Walinsky Nov 1995 A
5501694 Ressemann et al. Mar 1996 A
5524635 Uflacker et al. Jun 1996 A
5527282 Segal Jun 1996 A
5536178 Novelli Jul 1996 A
5538504 Linden et al. Jul 1996 A
5545132 Fagan et al. Aug 1996 A
5556405 Lary Sep 1996 A
5556408 Farhat Sep 1996 A
5562620 Klein et al. Oct 1996 A
5569195 Saab Oct 1996 A
5571086 Kaplan et al. Nov 1996 A
5571523 Lee et al. Nov 1996 A
5607442 Fischell et al. Mar 1997 A
5609574 Kaplan et al. Mar 1997 A
5616149 Barath Apr 1997 A
5620457 Pinchasik et al. Apr 1997 A
5624433 Radisch et al. Apr 1997 A
5628746 Clayman May 1997 A
5628755 Heller et al. May 1997 A
5643210 Iacob Jul 1997 A
5649941 Lary Jul 1997 A
5681281 Vigil et al. Oct 1997 A
5690642 Osborne et al. Nov 1997 A
5695469 Segal Dec 1997 A
5697944 Lary Dec 1997 A
5697971 Fischell et al. Dec 1997 A
5702410 Klunder et al. Dec 1997 A
5707385 Williams Jan 1998 A
5713863 Vigil et al. Feb 1998 A
5713913 Lary et al. Feb 1998 A
5730698 Fischell et al. Mar 1998 A
5733303 Israel et al. Mar 1998 A
5735816 Lieber et al. Apr 1998 A
5742019 Radisch et al. Apr 1998 A
5746716 Vigil et al. May 1998 A
5746968 Radisch et al. May 1998 A
5755708 Segal May 1998 A
5755778 Kleshinski May 1998 A
5755781 Jayaraman May 1998 A
5766201 Ravenscroft et al. Jun 1998 A
5766238 Lau et al. Jun 1998 A
5772681 Leoni Jun 1998 A
5776141 Klein et al. Jul 1998 A
5776181 Lee et al. Jul 1998 A
5779698 Clayman et al. Jul 1998 A
5792144 Fischell et al. Aug 1998 A
5792415 Hijlkema Aug 1998 A
5797935 Barath Aug 1998 A
5800450 Lary et al. Sep 1998 A
5807355 Ramzipoor et al. Sep 1998 A
5810767 Klein Sep 1998 A
5814061 Osborne et al. Sep 1998 A
5827321 Roubin et al. Oct 1998 A
5863284 Klein Jan 1999 A
5868708 Hart et al. Feb 1999 A
5868719 Tsukernik Feb 1999 A
5868779 Ruiz Feb 1999 A
5868783 Tower Feb 1999 A
5869284 Cao et al. Feb 1999 A
5873852 Vigil et al. Feb 1999 A
5891090 Thornton Apr 1999 A
5893840 Hull et al. Apr 1999 A
5902475 Trozera et al. May 1999 A
5904679 Clayman May 1999 A
5904698 Thomas et al. May 1999 A
5906639 Rudnick et al. May 1999 A
5916166 Reiss et al. Jun 1999 A
5919200 Stambaugh et al. Jul 1999 A
5954742 Osypka Sep 1999 A
5961490 Adams Oct 1999 A
5967984 Chu et al. Oct 1999 A
5980486 Enger Nov 1999 A
5987661 Peterson Nov 1999 A
5994667 Merdan et al. Nov 1999 A
6004295 Langer et al. Dec 1999 A
6013055 Bampos et al. Jan 2000 A
6036686 Griswold Mar 2000 A
6036689 Tu et al. Mar 2000 A
6036708 Sciver Mar 2000 A
6048356 Ravenscroft et al. Apr 2000 A
6053913 Tu et al. Apr 2000 A
6059811 Pinchasik et al. May 2000 A
6071285 Lashinski et al. Jun 2000 A
6071286 Mawad Jun 2000 A
6077298 Tu et al. Jun 2000 A
RE36764 Zacca et al. Jul 2000 E
6102904 Vigil et al. Aug 2000 A
6106548 Roubin et al. Aug 2000 A
6117104 Fitz Sep 2000 A
6117153 Lary et al. Sep 2000 A
6123718 Tu et al. Sep 2000 A
6129706 Janacek Oct 2000 A
6129708 Enger Oct 2000 A
6136011 Stambaugh Oct 2000 A
6146323 Fischell Nov 2000 A
6152944 Holman et al. Nov 2000 A
6156254 Andrews et al. Dec 2000 A
6156265 Sugimoto Dec 2000 A
6165187 Reger Dec 2000 A
6190356 Bersin Feb 2001 B1
6190403 Fischell et al. Feb 2001 B1
6193686 Estrada et al. Feb 2001 B1
6197013 Reed et al. Mar 2001 B1
6203569 Wijay Mar 2001 B1
6206910 Berry et al. Mar 2001 B1
6210392 Vigil et al. Apr 2001 B1
6211247 Goodman Apr 2001 B1
6224625 Jayaraman May 2001 B1
6235043 Reiley et al. May 2001 B1
6241762 Shanley Jun 2001 B1
6245040 Inderbitzen et al. Jun 2001 B1
6258087 Edwards et al. Jul 2001 B1
6258108 Lary Jul 2001 B1
6261319 Kveen et al. Jul 2001 B1
6280411 Lennox Aug 2001 B1
6283947 Mirzaee Sep 2001 B1
6283951 Flaherty et al. Sep 2001 B1
6287336 Globerman et al. Sep 2001 B1
6289568 Miller et al. Sep 2001 B1
6296651 Lary et al. Oct 2001 B1
6299604 Ragheb et al. Oct 2001 B1
6306151 Lary Oct 2001 B1
6306166 Barry et al. Oct 2001 B1
6309414 Rolando et al. Oct 2001 B1
6312459 Huang et al. Nov 2001 B1
6319229 Kim et al. Nov 2001 B1
6319230 Palasis et al. Nov 2001 B1
6319242 Patterson et al. Nov 2001 B1
6319251 Tu et al. Nov 2001 B1
6325779 Zedler Dec 2001 B1
6325813 Hektner Dec 2001 B1
6332880 Yang et al. Dec 2001 B1
6355013 van Muiden Mar 2002 B1
6355059 Richter et al. Mar 2002 B1
6361545 Macoviak et al. Mar 2002 B1
6364856 Ding et al. Apr 2002 B1
6371961 Osborne et al. Apr 2002 B1
6394995 Solar et al. May 2002 B1
6415009 Toporov et al. Jul 2002 B1
6416494 Wilkins Jul 2002 B1
6416539 Hassdenteufel Jul 2002 B1
6419692 Yang et al. Jul 2002 B1
6425882 Vigil Jul 2002 B1
6425908 Ravenscroft et al. Jul 2002 B2
6440158 Saab Aug 2002 B1
6447501 Solar et al. Sep 2002 B1
6450988 Bradshaw Sep 2002 B1
6450989 Dubrul et al. Sep 2002 B2
6454775 Demarais et al. Sep 2002 B1
6471979 New et al. Oct 2002 B2
6475233 Trozera Nov 2002 B2
6475234 Richter et al. Nov 2002 B1
6475236 Roubin et al. Nov 2002 B1
6478807 Foreman et al. Nov 2002 B1
6500186 Lafontaine et al. Dec 2002 B2
6515099 Sato et al. Feb 2003 B2
6517765 Kelley Feb 2003 B1
6540722 Boyle et al. Apr 2003 B1
6551310 Ganz et al. Apr 2003 B1
6554795 Bagaoisan et al. Apr 2003 B2
6562062 Jenusaitis et al. May 2003 B2
6565528 Mueller May 2003 B1
6569180 Sirhan et al. May 2003 B1
6575993 Yock Jun 2003 B1
6592548 Jayaraman Jul 2003 B2
6602281 Klein Aug 2003 B1
6605107 Klein Aug 2003 B1
6607442 Ogata et al. Aug 2003 B2
6613072 Lau et al. Sep 2003 B2
6616650 Rowe Sep 2003 B1
6616678 Nishtala et al. Sep 2003 B2
6626861 Hart et al. Sep 2003 B1
6632231 Radisch et al. Oct 2003 B2
6648912 Trout et al. Nov 2003 B2
6652548 Evans et al. Nov 2003 B2
6656156 Yang et al. Dec 2003 B2
6656351 Boyle Dec 2003 B2
6663660 Dusbabek et al. Dec 2003 B2
6682545 Kester Jan 2004 B1
6695813 Boyle et al. Feb 2004 B1
6730064 Ragheb et al. May 2004 B2
6743196 Barbut et al. Jun 2004 B2
6746463 Schwartz Jun 2004 B1
6783542 Eidenschink Aug 2004 B2
6840950 Stanford et al. Jan 2005 B2
6872206 Edwards et al. Mar 2005 B2
6918920 Wang et al. Jul 2005 B1
6939320 Lennox Sep 2005 B2
6942680 Grayzel et al. Sep 2005 B2
6951566 Lary Oct 2005 B2
7011654 Dubrul et al. Mar 2006 B2
7011670 Radisch et al. Mar 2006 B2
7029483 Schwartz Apr 2006 B2
7060051 Palasis Jun 2006 B2
7108684 Farnan Sep 2006 B2
7131981 Appling et al. Nov 2006 B2
7172609 Radisch et al. Feb 2007 B2
7186237 Meyer et al. Mar 2007 B2
7232432 Fulton et al. Jun 2007 B2
7303572 Melsheimer et al. Dec 2007 B2
7354445 Nicholson et al. Apr 2008 B2
7357813 Burgermeister Apr 2008 B2
7396358 Appling et al. Jul 2008 B2
7445792 Toner et al. Nov 2008 B2
7445795 Bakhshaee et al. Nov 2008 B2
7455652 Laird Nov 2008 B2
7465311 Wang et al. Dec 2008 B2
7494497 Weber Feb 2009 B2
7517352 Evans et al. Apr 2009 B2
7524319 Dubrul Apr 2009 B2
7566319 McAuley et al. Jul 2009 B2
7686824 Konstantino et al. Mar 2010 B2
7691119 Farnan Apr 2010 B2
7708748 Weisenburgh, II et al. May 2010 B2
7708753 Hardert May 2010 B2
7736375 Crow Jun 2010 B2
7763043 Goodin et al. Jul 2010 B2
7780715 Shaked et al. Aug 2010 B2
7780798 Stinson et al. Aug 2010 B2
7803149 Bates et al. Sep 2010 B2
7811622 Bates et al. Oct 2010 B2
7875284 Reyes et al. Jan 2011 B2
7931663 Farnan et al. Apr 2011 B2
7955350 Konstantino et al. Jun 2011 B2
7963942 Chen Jun 2011 B2
7976557 Kunis Jul 2011 B2
7998184 Eidenschink Aug 2011 B2
8043259 Radisch et al. Oct 2011 B2
8052703 St. Martin et al. Nov 2011 B2
8066726 Kelley Nov 2011 B2
8080026 Konstantino et al. Dec 2011 B2
8123770 Olsen et al. Feb 2012 B2
8192675 Burton et al. Jun 2012 B2
8221444 Wang et al. Jul 2012 B2
8323307 Hardert Dec 2012 B2
8348987 Eaton Jan 2013 B2
8382820 Addonizio et al. Feb 2013 B2
8454637 Aggerholm et al. Jun 2013 B2
8574248 Kassab Nov 2013 B2
8673387 Bates et al. Mar 2014 B2
8685050 Schur et al. Apr 2014 B2
8685990 Coats et al. Apr 2014 B2
9011896 Speck Apr 2015 B2
9072812 Speck Jul 2015 B2
9078951 Speck Jul 2015 B2
9101684 Speck Aug 2015 B2
9173977 Speck Nov 2015 B2
9629942 Speck Apr 2017 B2
9770536 Speck et al. Sep 2017 B2
20010001113 Lim et al. May 2001 A1
20010001823 Ryan May 2001 A1
20010007082 Dusbabek et al. Jul 2001 A1
20010012950 Nishtala et al. Aug 2001 A1
20010016753 Caprio et al. Aug 2001 A1
20020010487 Evans et al. Jan 2002 A1
20020010489 Grayzel et al. Jan 2002 A1
20020029015 Camenzind et al. Mar 2002 A1
20020037358 Barry et al. Mar 2002 A1
20020038144 Trout et al. Mar 2002 A1
20020045930 Burg et al. Apr 2002 A1
20020065548 Birdsall et al. May 2002 A1
20020091438 Trozera Jul 2002 A1
20020111633 Stoltze et al. Aug 2002 A1
20020165599 Nasralla Nov 2002 A1
20020193873 Brucker et al. Dec 2002 A1
20030018376 Solar et al. Jan 2003 A1
20030023200 Barbut et al. Jan 2003 A1
20030028235 McIntosh et al. Feb 2003 A1
20030032973 Jenusaitis et al. Feb 2003 A1
20030065381 Solar et al. Apr 2003 A1
20030074046 Richter Apr 2003 A1
20030078606 Lafontaine et al. Apr 2003 A1
20030097169 Brucker et al. May 2003 A1
20030105509 Jang et al. Jun 2003 A1
20030114915 Mareiro et al. Jun 2003 A1
20030144683 Sirhan et al. Jul 2003 A1
20030149468 Wallsten Aug 2003 A1
20030152870 Huang Aug 2003 A1
20030153870 Meyer et al. Aug 2003 A1
20030171799 Lee et al. Sep 2003 A1
20030187494 Loaldi Oct 2003 A1
20030195609 Berenstein et al. Oct 2003 A1
20030199970 Shanley Oct 2003 A1
20030199988 Devonec et al. Oct 2003 A1
20030208244 Stein et al. Nov 2003 A1
20030208255 O'Shaughnessy et al. Nov 2003 A1
20040034384 Fukaya Feb 2004 A1
20040106975 Solovay et al. Jun 2004 A1
20040111108 Robert Faman Jun 2004 A1
20040127475 New et al. Jul 2004 A1
20040133223 Weber Jul 2004 A1
20040143287 Konstantino et al. Jul 2004 A1
20040193257 Wu et al. Sep 2004 A1
20040208985 Rowan et al. Oct 2004 A1
20040210299 Rogers et al. Oct 2004 A1
20040230293 Yip et al. Nov 2004 A1
20040243158 Konstantino et al. Dec 2004 A1
20050010278 Vardi et al. Jan 2005 A1
20050021070 Feld et al. Jan 2005 A1
20050021071 Konstantino et al. Jan 2005 A1
20050033417 Borges et al. Feb 2005 A1
20050037048 Song Feb 2005 A1
20050070888 DiMatteo et al. Mar 2005 A1
20050080478 Barongan Apr 2005 A1
20050083768 Hara Apr 2005 A1
20050119723 Peacock Jun 2005 A1
20050131512 Vonderwalde Jun 2005 A1
20050137690 Salahieh et al. Jun 2005 A1
20050271844 Mapes et al. Dec 2005 A1
20050278021 Bates et al. Dec 2005 A1
20050288629 Kunis Dec 2005 A1
20060004323 Chang et al. Jan 2006 A1
20060015133 Grayzel et al. Jan 2006 A1
20060020243 Speck et al. Jan 2006 A1
20060074484 Huber Apr 2006 A1
20060085025 Farnan et al. Apr 2006 A1
20060111736 Kelley May 2006 A1
20060112536 Herweck et al. Jun 2006 A1
20060129093 Jackson Jun 2006 A1
20060149308 Melsheimer et al. Jul 2006 A1
20060173487 Uflacker et al. Aug 2006 A1
20060184191 O'Brien Aug 2006 A1
20060240014 Sukhatme Oct 2006 A1
20060247674 Roman Nov 2006 A1
20060259005 Konstantino et al. Nov 2006 A1
20060259062 Konstantino Nov 2006 A1
20060270193 Hidaka et al. Nov 2006 A1
20070020380 Ding Jan 2007 A1
20070037739 Wang et al. Feb 2007 A1
20070112422 Dehdashtian May 2007 A1
20070128242 Zhao Jun 2007 A1
20070185513 Woolfson et al. Aug 2007 A1
20070190103 Hossainy et al. Aug 2007 A1
20070198047 Schon et al. Aug 2007 A1
20070212394 Reyes et al. Sep 2007 A1
20070213808 Roubin et al. Sep 2007 A1
20080021385 Barry et al. Jan 2008 A1
20080118544 Wang May 2008 A1
20080181927 Zhao Jul 2008 A1
20080241215 Falotico et al. Oct 2008 A1
20080300610 Chambers Dec 2008 A1
20090105686 Snow et al. Apr 2009 A1
20090105687 Deckman et al. Apr 2009 A1
20090136560 Bates et al. May 2009 A1
20090246252 Arps et al. Oct 2009 A1
20090246253 Ding Oct 2009 A1
20090264859 Mas Oct 2009 A1
20090281490 McAuley et al. Nov 2009 A1
20090306582 Granada et al. Dec 2009 A1
20100042121 Schneider et al. Feb 2010 A1
20100121372 Farnan May 2010 A1
20100179647 Carpenter et al. Jul 2010 A1
20100209472 Wang Aug 2010 A1
20100233228 Speck Sep 2010 A1
20100233236 Zhao Sep 2010 A1
20100278997 Speck et al. Nov 2010 A1
20100285085 Stankus et al. Nov 2010 A1
20100286720 Shaked et al. Nov 2010 A1
20100286721 Goodin et al. Nov 2010 A1
20100324645 Stankus et al. Dec 2010 A1
20110054396 Kangas et al. Mar 2011 A1
20110082483 Diamant et al. Apr 2011 A1
20110125247 Farnan et al. May 2011 A1
20110143014 Stankus et al. Jun 2011 A1
20110160756 Aggerholm et al. Jun 2011 A1
20110196340 Barry et al. Aug 2011 A1
20110230818 Kunis Sep 2011 A1
20110264039 Thielen et al. Oct 2011 A1
20110270177 Chambers et al. Nov 2011 A1
20110295200 Speck et al. Dec 2011 A1
20120059401 Konstantino et al. Mar 2012 A1
20120172787 McClain et al. Jul 2012 A1
20120215251 Burton et al. Aug 2012 A1
20120239001 Barry et al. Sep 2012 A1
20120277626 Burbank et al. Nov 2012 A1
20130023817 Speck et al. Jan 2013 A1
20130037777 Mikawa et al. Feb 2013 A1
20130041315 Speck Feb 2013 A1
20130041391 Spencer et al. Feb 2013 A1
20130041399 Hardert Feb 2013 A1
20130046237 Speck et al. Feb 2013 A1
20130060127 Burton et al. Mar 2013 A1
20130066346 Pigott Mar 2013 A1
20130096604 Hanson et al. Apr 2013 A1
20130150874 Kassab Jun 2013 A1
20130211381 Feld Aug 2013 A1
20130218181 Feld et al. Aug 2013 A1
20130231638 Speck et al. Sep 2013 A1
20140058358 Kassab Feb 2014 A1
20140066960 Feld et al. Mar 2014 A1
20140128801 Speck et al. May 2014 A1
20140257181 Speck Sep 2014 A1
20150297797 Speck et al. Oct 2015 A1
Foreign Referenced Citations (56)
Number Date Country
1688350 Oct 2005 CN
104689377 Jun 2015 CN
0565796 May 1997 EP
0623315 Jun 1999 EP
1169970 Jan 2002 EP
1179323 Feb 2002 EP
0832608 Mar 2003 EP
1042997 Mar 2005 EP
1581298 Aug 2006 EP
1414373 May 2008 EP
1337198 Jun 2009 EP
1748816 Jul 2010 EP
2063924 Oct 2010 EP
2283890 Feb 2011 EP
1962696 Mar 2012 EP
1737530 Mar 2013 EP
2564890 Mar 2013 EP
2886136 Jun 2015 EP
2886137 Jun 2015 EP
2002126086 May 2002 JP
2002126086 May 2002 JP
2004148013 May 2004 JP
2008504059 May 2005 JP
2005343897 Dec 2005 JP
5745030 Jun 2013 JP
WO1991002494 Mar 1991 WO
9217118 Oct 1992 WO
WO1993001753 Feb 1993 WO
WO1994010919 May 1994 WO
1994023787 Oct 1994 WO
WO1994023787 Oct 1994 WO
WO1994024946 Nov 1994 WO
WO1995003083 Feb 1995 WO
WO1998005377 Feb 1998 WO
WO1998045506 Oct 1998 WO
1999017680 Apr 1999 WO
1999055253 Nov 1999 WO
1999062430 Dec 1999 WO
02083011 Oct 2002 WO
2002076509 Oct 2002 WO
WO2002083011 Oct 2002 WO
WO2003026536 Apr 2003 WO
WO2003039628 May 2003 WO
WO2003041760 May 2003 WO
2004022124 Mar 2004 WO
2004028582 Apr 2004 WO
WO2004028610 Apr 2004 WO
WO2004060460 Jul 2004 WO
WO2004066852 Aug 2004 WO
2004108130 Dec 2004 WO
WO2005025458 Mar 2005 WO
2006007173 Jan 2006 WO
2009018816 Feb 2009 WO
2009066330 May 2009 WO
2009155405 Dec 2009 WO
2013177175 Nov 2013 WO
Non-Patent Literature Citations (25)
Entry
Cremers et al. Comparison of Two Different Paclitaxel-Coated Balloon Catheters in the Porcine Coronary Restenosis Model; Clin Res Cardiol (2009) 98:325-350; DOI 10.1007/s00392-009-0008-2.
EP Examination Report dated Oct. 9, 2013 from corresponding EP Application No. 10775805.4, 6 pages.
European Search Opinion issued in EP Application No. 15154222, dated May 18, 2015, 5 pages.
European search report and search opinion dated May 4, 2010 for EP 06770116.9.
European search report and search opinion dated Dec. 28, 2009 for EP 05792875.6.
European Search Report issued in EP Application No. 15154222 dated May 18, 2015. 2 pages.
Extended European Search Report issued in EP Application No. 11827369.7, dated Apr. 7, 2014. 6 pages.
File History for U.S. Appl. No. 11/411,635, filed Apr. 26, 2006.
File History for U.S. Appl. No. 13/044,425, filed Mar. 9, 2011.
File History for U.S. Appl. No. 13/842,080, filed Mar. 15, 2013.
First Examination Report dated Feb. 5, 2014 from corresponding EP Application No. 05733012.8.
International search report and written opinion dated Feb. 27, 2007 for PCT/US2006/017872.
International search report and written opinion dated May 23, 2006 for PCT /2005/009571.
International search report and written opinion dated Jul. 26, 2007 for PCT/2005/028809.
International search report and written opinion dated Nov. 4, 2004 for PCT/2004/000177.
International Search Report and Written Opinion issued in PCT Application No. PCTEP2010066754 dated May 1, 2011, 11 pages.
International Search Report and Written Opinion issued in PCT/US2011/052392 dated Jan. 11, 2012, 7 pages.
International Search Report issued in PCT/US2002/035547 dated May 20, 2003 , 3 Pages.
International Search Report issued in PCT/US2004/027836 dated Dec. 30, 2004 , 1 Page.
Japanese office action dated Jul. 9, 2010 for JP 2007-505113. (in Japanese with English translation).
Notification of Office Action dated Aug. 14, 2014 from corresponding JP Application No. 2013-505347.
Notification of the First Office Action dated Jan. 16, 2014, from corresponding Chinese Application No. 201080066293.3.
Scheller et al. Paclitaxel Balloon Coating, A Novel Method for Prevention and Therapy of Restenosis; Circulation. 2004;110:810-814, Aug. 9, 2004.
Supplementary European Search Report dated Nov. 20, 2013 from corresponding EP Application No. 05733012.8.
Suzuki et al. Anti-Oxidants for Therapeutic Use: Why Are Only a Few Drugs in Clinical Use? Advanced Drug Delivery Reviews, vol. 61, 2009, pp. 287-289.
Related Publications (1)
Number Date Country
20170340778 A1 Nov 2017 US
Continuations (3)
Number Date Country
Parent 14877284 Oct 2015 US
Child 15664941 US
Parent 13628627 Sep 2012 US
Child 14877284 US
Parent PCT/EP2011/056179 Apr 2011 US
Child 13628627 US