The invention relates to the transfer of a drug loosely adhering to the surface of a scoring or cutting balloon catheter to a site inside the body, usually in a diseased blood vessel. The preferred application is local drug therapy during percutaneous transluminal angioplasty (PTA) or percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty (PTCA). The interventions are performed to restore blood flow in stenotic or occluded blood vessels, usually into arteries. A catheter is introduced in a major artery. At the distal end the catheter carries a cylindrical balloon in folded state with very small diameter and additional tools or structures which scratch or cut the luminal surface of the treated blood vessel or tissue. In the folded state the balloon can enter or pass the stenotic or occluded segment of e.g. a blood vessel. Once positioned in the narrowed segment, the balloon is inflated to enlarge the lumen of the blood vessel to its original diameter. Simultaneously, a drug may be transferred to the vessel wall to prevent early and late re-narrowing due to hyperproliferation of the injured vessel wall.
Medical devices may contain drugs either to improve the tolerance, efficacy or in vivo life-time of the device or the device serves as carrier for the drug. In any case the dosedensity (e g. mg drug/mg device or mg drug/mm2 device surface), chemical stability, adherence, release rate, and total amount released are important and frequently critical features of the drug formulation. These properties are the more critical the more the requirements during production and application of the device vary or may even be contradictory. Drug-coated angioplasty catheters are typical examples: the drug coating must adhere firmly to tolerate mechanical stress during production including folding of balloons, crimping of stents, packaging, transportation to customers, and during final application, which involves the passage through a narrow hemostatic valve, an introductory sheath or guiding catheter and a variable distance through possibly tortuous and narrow blood vessels. When the balloon is inflated the drug should be released within a minute or less as rapidly and as completely as possible. The problem was demonstrated by Cremers et al. (Cremers B, Biedermann M, Mahnkopf D, Bohm M, Scheller B. Comparison of two different paclitaxel-coated balloon catheters in the porcine coronary restenosis model. Clin Res Cardiol 2009; 98:325-330) who retrieved as much as 50% of the dose from balloons after expansion for one minute in coronary arteries of pigs, whereas other catheters coated with the same drug and dose but in a different formulation released more than 95%. Almost perfect results (i.e., loss of only 10% of dose and residual drug on the balloon after expansion in an artery of about 10%) were achieved with a rigid prototype balloon (Scheller B, Speck U, Abramjuk C, Bernhardt U, Bohm M, Nickenig G. Paclitaxel balloon coating—a novel method for prevention and therapy of restenosis. Circulation 2004; 110: 810-814). The application of the same coating composition to more flexible modern balloon catheters resulted in problems, i.e., larger premature loss of the drug. The coating of scoring or cutting balloons with drugs in a reliable way with a dose which sufficient to be efficacious imposes additional problems because of the more complex structure of the device and the more complex production process.
Protection from premature drug release. Premature release of a drug from a balloon is a major problem which has been addressed by a variety of methods. Some of them are mechanical, e.g. the use of protection tubes, sleeves, envelops. Examples are U.S. Pat. Nos. 5,370,614, 6,306,166, and 6,616,650 disclosing various protective sheaths which are retracted before the balloon is inflated, or U.S. Pat. No. 6,419,692 proposing a cover which bursts during balloon expansion. A different approach is taken in U.S. Pat. No. 5,893,840 disclosing structured balloon membranes with tiny cavities, WO 94/23787 with roughened balloon membranes to enhance the adherence of coating, or more recently U.S. Pat. No. 7,108,684 proposing a pouch which protects the drug-containing layer on the balloon and WO 2009/066330 disclosing methods placing the drug selectively under the folds of a folded balloon. Although efficacious these methods have the disadvantage of increasing the complexity and cost of production or make handling of the devices more difficult or add to the diameter of the devices (which must be kept as small as possible to facilitate passage through stenotic lesions). In some embodiments the protective membranes or perforated membranes interfere with the scoring components of the balloons or prevent a homogeneous transfer of the drug to the tissue or even put the patient at risk. None of these methods has been applied to scoring or cutting balloons and nothing is known about problems which will arise from the increasing complexity and mechanical problems arising from a disturbance of the protecting envelops by the scoring or cutting structures and vice-versa.
Other approaches use either physical or chemical methods to control the release of drugs from a balloon surface, e.g. U.S. Pat. No. 5,304,121 describes a hydrogel which releases the drug only after exposure to a triggering agent; U.S. Pat. No. 5,199,951 relies on thermal activation; according to U.S. Pat. No. 7,445,792 a lipophilic ‘hydration inhibitor’ protects water-soluble drugs from premature release; and according to U.S. Pat. No. 5,370,614 a viscous matrix protects the drug from premature release, however, the viscous matrix must be protected by a sheath during the passage to the stenotic vessel segment. None of the methods has been tested in practice and proven to fulfill the requirements for fast, reliable and complete drug transfer to the target tissue. None of the methods has been designed to be used with scoring or cutting balloons.
Numerous methods of sustained drug release are known and successfully used in practice but are not applicable to medical devices which are in contact with the target tissue for only a few seconds or minutes. Sustained drug release is usually achieved by embedding the drug in a polymer which restricts the diffusion rate to the surface and in this way controls the transfer into the adjacent tissue.
Therefore, a need remains for a method or formulation which protects the coating from premature losses during production, handling, and on the way to the lesion and still allows the immediate and complete release of the active ingredient at a location and point in time determined by the user. During the production process this problem is even more severe for scoring and cutting balloons because of the more complex structure of the product. Scoring and cutting balloons have merits in the treatment of certain lesions, e.g. if the conventional smooth balloons tend to dislocate during inflation or if a controlled and predetermined injury of the vessel wall is preferred to an uncontrolled dissection during balloon inflation. Nevertheless, the problem of renarrowing of the vessel lumen due to excessive neointimal proliferation as a reaction to the unavoidable injury during dilatation is the same as with conventional balloon catheters.
An advantageous way to control adherence and release of a drug from a medical device, e.g., an angioplasty balloon, is the selection of a suitable formulation and coating which do not require mechanical protection, or additional physical or chemical interaction with the coating except the usual operation of the device e.g. inflation of a folded balloon to induce the release of the drug. Although desirable and frequently tried, the conflicting objectives of perfect adherence during production and before use and immediate release at the site of action make it a difficult task. A large variety of patent applications vaguely disclose measures, compositions and devices to solve this problem for conventional balloon catheters either by the selection of drugs, the choice of specific coating processes or formulations containing various additives. Long lists of compounds have been copied from textbooks of chemistry, pharmacology, or pharmacy but even with extensive experimentation disclosures are not sufficiently clear to allow a person familiar with the subject and skilled in the art to come to a satisfactory solution without an inventive step. Examples of prior art are US 2008/0118544 reciting an excessive number of substances and substance classes or U.S. Pat. No. 7,445,795 which discloses the use of hydration inhibitors' not applicable to the preferred class of very lipophilic drugs which require ‘hydration enhancers’ as e.g. disclosed in WO 2004/028582. Although the hydrophilic additives (which may be regarded as ‘hydration enhancer’) work quite well on certain conventional balloon membranes (Scheller B, Speck U, Abramjuk C, Bernhardt U, Bohm M, Nickenig G. Pa-clitaxel balloon coating—a novel method for prevention and therapy of restenosis. Circulation 2004; 110: 810-814) the adherence to various modern conventional or scoring PTA or PTCA balloons is either too weak or too tight resulting in premature loss of a major proportion of the drug or incomplete release at the target site. None of the known compositions has been tried on scoring or cutting balloon catheters.
Prior Art: Antioxidants.
In theory, antioxidants address an almost universal feature of diseased tissue, namely the Reactive oxygen species', and should have widespread medical applications. In practice, only very few controlled clinical trials have shown beneficial effects of antioxidants (Suzuki K. Antioxidants for therapeutic use: Why are only a few drugs in clinical use?Advanced Drug Delivery Reviews 2009; 61:287-289). Antioxidants are mentioned as potentially useful drugs for the treatment of focal vascular disease such as stenosis, restenosis, atherosclerotic plaques, and vulnerable plaques in US 2009/0136560 with no additive, in U.S. Pat. No. 5,571,523 as agents inducing apoptosis in vascular smooth muscle cells, in WO 2004/022124 either as active drugs or as ‘hydration inhibitors’. In US 2008/0241215 probucol, a drug approved for the treatment of hyperlipidemia, a known risk factor for atheriosclerosis, is proposed as the active ingredient in stent coating, either alone or combined with rapamycin or another anti-restenotic agent in a slow-release formulation. None of the above-mentioned documents contains data encouraging the use as additives to a lipophilic drug to delay the release rate of the drug and no specific compositions are disclosed which address the above-mentioned problems of adhesion of a drug before the target lesion is reached and immediate release when required.
Small proportions of antioxidants are commonly used to protect drugs or nutrients from decomposition by oxygen or oxidation, an application which has also been proposed for drugs coated on implantable medical devices such as stents (US 2007/0020380, US 2009/0246253) or balloon catheters (US 2009/0246252, especially paragraph [105]). However, antioxidants are commonly used in proportions of less than 1% by weight in relation to 100% by weight of the drug. Normally it is intended to use as less antioxidant as possible, i.e., less than 0.1% by weight in relation to 100% by weight of the drug (Voigt R. Lehrbuch der pharmazeutischen Technologie. 5. Edition, Verlag Chemie, Weinheim—Deer-field Beach, Fla.—Basel, 1984).
Present Invention.
The problem underlying the present invention was the provision of a scoring or cutting balloon catheter with an improved adherence of the drug without negative effect on the release of the drug at the target site.
The problem was solved by a scoring or cutting balloon catheter according to claim 1. In other words, the problem was solved by a scoring or cutting balloon catheter carrying at least on a portion of its surface at least one drug or drug preparation and at least one lipophilic antioxidant at a ratio of 3-100% by weight of the at least one lipophilic antioxidant in relation to 100% by weight of the drug, wherein a combination of limus drugs with butylated hydroxytoluene as the lipophilic antioxidant is excluded. Preferred embodiments are disclosed in the dependant claims.
During testing of a large variety of coating methods, additives and drug combinations the surprising discovery was made that certain lipophilic antioxidants added to even more lipophilic and less water soluble drugs in a defined mass ratio significantly increase the adherence of the drug to scoring and cutting balloons during handling and on the way to the target lesion even if the target lesion is located far away from the site where the device first enters a blood-filled introductory sheath, guiding catheter or vessel containing rapidly flowing blood. This was also tested with scoring balloons. In spite of the additional mechanical stress (as compared to conventional balloons) imposed on the coating due the movement of the scoring wires surrounding the folded balloons the loss of the drug during the passage through a narrow hemostatic valve and a 3 curved guiding catheter was very low. Thus, at least one lipophilic antioxidant in an amount of 3-100% by weight is used as an adherence improver for drugs coated on a scoring or cutting balloon catheter. The wording “at least one lipophilic antioxidant” means that single antioxidants but also mixtures of different antioxidants are included.
Preferred examples of active drugs are inhibitors of cell proliferation, preferably taxanes such as paclitaxel, do-cetaxel and protaxel, immunosuppressants belonging to the class of substances binding to the mammalian target of ra-pamycin (mTOR), i.e., mTOR inhibitors such as sirolimus, everolimus, zotarolimus, biolimus and temsirolimus, most preferred is sirolimus, referred to as limus-drugs. Alternatively, specific inhibitors of neovascularization such as thalidomide, statins like atorvastatin, cerivastatin, flu-vastatin or anti-inflammatory drugs like corticoids or even more preferred lipophilic derivatives of corticoids such as betamethasone diproprionate or dexamethasone-21-palmitate. Various drugs may be applied or combined if different pharmacological actions are required or efficacy or tolerance is to be improved. Thus, the wording “at least one drug or drug preparation” means that single drugs but also mixtures of different drugs are included. Preferred drugs are either lipophilic (partition coefficient between n-butanol and water >10, or display very poor water solubility (<1 mg/ml, 20° C.).
Preferred additives to the active drugs are lipophilic antioxidants, particularly preferred are antioxidants which are solid at temperatures up to 40° C. Preferred are buty-lated hydroxytoluene, butylated hydroxyanisole, nordihy-droguaiaretic acid, propyl gallate and ascorbyl palmitate. Probucol is not a preferred additive. The combination of mTOR-binding limus-drugs with butylated hydroxytoluene is excluded as already mentioned above. This applies to combinations of the single drug with the single antioxidant as well as to combinations of butylated hydroxytoluene with mixtures consisting of different Limus drugs.
Lipophilic antioxidant means that the partition coefficient of the antioxidant between n-butanol and water is >1, more preferred >10 and even more preferred >100.
Preferably, the drug is more lipophilic than the antioxidant, i.e., the partition coefficient between n-butanol and water of the drug is higher than the partition coefficient between n-butanol and water of the antioxidant.
At the dose density used the chosen antioxidants do not display relevant therapeutic or prophylactic effects in respect of the disease which is treated by the coated medical device nor is the relative amount of the antioxidant chosen to protect the drug from oxidative decomposition. The dose density and the mass relation of the antioxidant to the drug are solely optimized in respect of adherence of the drug to and release from the medical device surface. The antioxidant dose on the medical device is too low to provide the desired pharmacological effect, i.e., it is ineffective on its own. The antioxidant on the medical device is not required to protect the active drug (e.g., the antiproliferative drug) from oxidative decomposition during production, sterilization and storage; at least it is not required at the dose or concentration applied according to this invention. ‘Not required’ means that the active drug is stable enough without the antioxidant or at an antioxidant dose or dose density or ratio to the active drug below the dose according to the present invention. ‘Sufficient stability’ means that less than 5% of the active drug is lost due to oxidative decomposition between the coating of the device and the use in patients one year after production if stored at ambient temperature (=drug or drug preparation stable against oxidative decomposition).
The dose of the antioxidant on the surface of a medical device may be defined in respect of the therapeutic drug. Preferred relationships (weight/weight) are 3-100% antioxidant of the weight of the drug. For example, if the dose density of the drug is 5 μg/mm2 device surface, the amount of antioxidant is 0.15-5.0 μg/mm2. Higher proportions of the antioxidant may be selected if either the drug is applied at a dose below 3 μg/mm2 device surface or the adherence of the drug to the device surface is further improved. The antioxidant load of the device may reach 10 μg/mm2. A higher load is possible. Other preferred ranges for the relationship of antioxidant to drug on a weight/weight basis are 5-100%, more preferred 10-100%, and even more preferred 20-100% in relation to 100% of the drug. The relationship may also be defined in respect of moles in a preferred embodiment the antioxidant is present from 10 mole % relative to the drug to 200 mole %. Higher amounts of the antioxidant may be useful; they are only excluded if they display on their own significant pharmacological prophylactic or therapeutic effects in respect of the disease to be treated application of the same coating composition to more flexible modern balloon catheters resulted in problems, i.e., larger premature loss of the drug. The coating of scoring or cutting balloons with drugs in a reliable way with a dose which is sufficient to be efficacious imposes additional problems because of the more complex structure of the device and the more complex production process.
If more than one drug is used the total weight of the drugs or the total moles of the drugs serve as basis for the calculation of the amount of the antioxidant. If more than one antioxidant is used the total weight of the antioxidants or the total moles of the antioxidants serve as basis for the calculation of the amount of the antioxidants.
Polymer-free coating compositions are preferred. It is a special advantage of the present compositions that they do not require the use of polymers to prevent premature release of the drug.
Usually, drugs and mixtures of drugs with additives are coated on medical devices as liquid formulations in volatile solvents. The choice of solvent is important for the distribution of the drug on the device, especially if the device is coated at an advanced stage of production. An advanced stage of production of a scoring or cutting balloon may include the scoring or cutting elements of the device, the structures required to fix these elements and an already folded balloon. The solvents further determine the structure of the coating in dry state and the adherence and release of the drug from the surface. Preferred organic solvents are acetone, tetrahydrofuran, and various alcohols such as methanol and ethanol. Usually, 1 to 30% (volume/volume) water is added. The drug or drugs and the antioxidant may be applied at the same time dissolved in the same solvent or mixture of solvents. Alternatively, they may be separately dissolved in the same or different solvents and sequentially applied. In a preferred embodiment, the scoring or cutting balloon catheter has been coated with at least one drug and at least one antioxidant both together ore each separately dissolved in tetrahydrofuran or a mixture of solvents containing more than 25% (v/v) tetrahydrofuran. Another preferred embodiment is based on a scoring or cutting balloon catheter, which has been coated with at least one drug and at least one antioxidant both together or each separately dissolved in acetone or a mixture of solvents containing more than 25% (v/v) acetone. Coating with dry particles such as micro- or nanoparticles, crystals, capsules etc. or particles suspended in a liquid preparation is possible. Coating with particles may be facilitated by a roughened or sticky surface of the medical device.
A variety of coating procedures providing more or less uniform layers on medical devices are known from the literature and are disclosed in patent applications. These include simple dipping, spraying, and methods providing precise doses and homogeneous distributions (e.g., WO 2009/018816). Coating may be applied stepwise, either as multiple layers of the same composition or as layers with different compositions e.g. the drug first and the antioxidant second or in the opposite order. All these methods may be applied to the formulations of the current invention. Furthermore, coated medical devices may be dried under different conditions such as temperature, air flow, gas composition, and pressure at different stages of the production process. They may be stored in water-vapor-tight seals with a separately packed water absorbing-agent within the seal.
Subject of the current invention are scoring or cutting balloon catheters, e.g., catheters for angioplasty or coronary angioplasty. Preferred are scoring or cutting balloon catheters for short-lasting use during an interventional image guided therapy. Short lasting use means that the device is not implanted but eliminated from the body when the procedure is finished, usually within less than 10 minutes, but never later than a few, preferably 5, hours after the end of the procedure. Catheters may contain balloon membranes made from various polymers and copolymers, polyam-ides (nylon 12, pebax), polyethylenes, polyurethanes, various polyvinyls and the like. Independently of the type of material, the adherence and release properties of drugs are improved by the addition of lipophilic antioxidants. Furthermore, catheters comprise elements which are aimed at scoring or cutting the surfaces in direct contact with the inflated balloons, e.g. wires with various profiles, or protrusions of the balloon surface.
The scoring or cutting balloon catheter carries the at least one drug or drug preparation and the at least one lipophilic antioxidant at least on a portion of its surface which is aimed at coming into close contact with the tissue to be treated, e.g., the balloon at the distal portion of a catheter shaft. This means that at least 5%, preferably more than 50%, most preferably more than 90% of the surface is coated. The balloon of a scoring or cutting balloon catheter has a central cylindrical part and two opposite conical ends. If less than 100% of the balloon catheter's surface is coated, it is preferred that the cylindrical part is coated and that at least parts of or the complete conical ends remain uncoated.
Below, the invention is described by means of Examples.
Balloons for percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty type A (AngioSculpt 3.5-20 mm, AngioScore, Inc., Fremont Calif., USA were coated either with paclitaxel alone or combined with iopromide (iodinated contrast agent according to WO 02/076509) or different amounts of butylated hydroxy-toluene (BHT); solvent:acetone/ethanol/H2O. Coated balloons were tested in respect of paclitaxel loss during the passage through a hemostatic valve, Medtronic Launcher JL 3.5 6F guiding catheter and one minute in stirred blood (37° C.). When admixed at sufficient concentration to the coating solution, BHT improved the adhesion of paclitaxel.
Balloons for percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty type A were coated either with paclitaxel alone or combined with iopromide (iodinated contrast agent according to WO 02/076509), see example 2, or butylated hydroxytoluene (BHT) or nordihydroguaj arctic acid. Coated balloons were tested in respect of paclitaxel loss during the passage through a hemostatic valve, a Medtronic Launcher JL 3.5 6F guiding catheter and in stirred blood (37° C.) for one minute. When admixed at sufficient concentration to the coating solution, lipophilic antioxidants improve the adhesion of paclitaxel whereas the release during balloon inflation in a coronary artery (determined in separate experiments) was not impaired.
Number | Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
10160347 | Apr 2010 | EP | regional |
This application is a continuation of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 14/877,284, filed Oct. 7, 2015, and issued as U.S. Pat. No. 9,770,536, which is a continuation of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 13/628,627, filed Sep. 27, 2012, and issued as U.S. Pat. No. 9,173,977, which is a continuation of PCT Application No. PCT/EP2011/056179, filed Apr. 18, 2011, which claims the benefit of EP Application No. 10160347.0, filed Apr. 19, 2010, the full disclosures of each of which are incorporated herein by reference in their entirety.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
2701559 | Cooper | Feb 1955 | A |
2854983 | Baskin | Oct 1958 | A |
3045677 | Wallace | Jul 1962 | A |
3467101 | Fogarty et al. | Sep 1969 | A |
3825013 | Craven | Jul 1974 | A |
4327736 | Inoue | May 1982 | A |
4456011 | Warnecke | Jun 1984 | A |
4483340 | Fogarty et al. | Nov 1984 | A |
4578061 | Lemelson | Mar 1986 | A |
4604762 | Robinson | Aug 1986 | A |
4637396 | Cook | Jan 1987 | A |
4649922 | Wiktor | Mar 1987 | A |
4723549 | Wholey et al. | Feb 1988 | A |
4796629 | Grayzel | Jan 1989 | A |
4838853 | Parisi | Jun 1989 | A |
4887613 | Farr et al. | Dec 1989 | A |
4895166 | Farr et al. | Jan 1990 | A |
4921484 | Hillstead | May 1990 | A |
4942788 | Farr et al. | Jul 1990 | A |
4950277 | Farr | Aug 1990 | A |
4956830 | Mock et al. | Sep 1990 | A |
4966604 | Reiss | Oct 1990 | A |
4969458 | Wiktor | Nov 1990 | A |
4976711 | Parins et al. | Dec 1990 | A |
4986807 | Farr | Jan 1991 | A |
4986830 | Owens et al. | Jan 1991 | A |
4998539 | Delsanti | Mar 1991 | A |
5003918 | Olson et al. | Apr 1991 | A |
5019088 | Farr | May 1991 | A |
5019089 | Farr | May 1991 | A |
5026384 | Farr et al. | Jun 1991 | A |
5062384 | Foley et al. | Nov 1991 | A |
5062648 | Gomringer | Nov 1991 | A |
5071407 | Termin et al. | Dec 1991 | A |
5098440 | Hillstead | Mar 1992 | A |
5100386 | Inoue | Mar 1992 | A |
5100423 | Fearnot | Mar 1992 | A |
5101682 | Radisch et al. | Apr 1992 | A |
5102402 | Dror et al. | Apr 1992 | A |
5102417 | Palmaz | Apr 1992 | A |
5108416 | Ryan et al. | Apr 1992 | A |
5112345 | Farr | May 1992 | A |
5116318 | Hillstead | May 1992 | A |
5120322 | Davis et al. | Jun 1992 | A |
5133732 | Wiktor | Jul 1992 | A |
5176693 | Pannek et al. | Jan 1993 | A |
5181911 | Shturman | Jan 1993 | A |
5190058 | Jones et al. | Mar 1993 | A |
5192291 | Pannek et al. | Mar 1993 | A |
5196024 | Barath | Mar 1993 | A |
5199951 | Spears | Apr 1993 | A |
5209727 | Radisch et al. | May 1993 | A |
5221261 | Termin et al. | Jun 1993 | A |
5221727 | Kumpf et al. | Jun 1993 | A |
5222971 | Willard et al. | Jun 1993 | A |
5224945 | Pannek et al. | Jul 1993 | A |
5224949 | Gomringer et al. | Jul 1993 | A |
5226887 | Farr et al. | Jul 1993 | A |
5243997 | Uflacker et al. | Sep 1993 | A |
5263963 | Garrison et al. | Nov 1993 | A |
5295493 | Radisch et al. | Mar 1994 | A |
5295959 | Gurbel et al. | Mar 1994 | A |
5304121 | Sahatjian | Apr 1994 | A |
5306250 | March et al. | Apr 1994 | A |
5308354 | Zacca et al. | May 1994 | A |
5308356 | Blackshear, Jr. et al. | May 1994 | A |
5318576 | Plassche et al. | Jun 1994 | A |
5320634 | Vigil et al. | Jun 1994 | A |
5336178 | Kaplan et al. | Aug 1994 | A |
5336234 | Vigil et al. | Aug 1994 | A |
5344401 | Radisch et al. | Sep 1994 | A |
5344419 | Spears | Sep 1994 | A |
5350101 | Godlewski | Sep 1994 | A |
5354279 | Hofling | Oct 1994 | A |
5370614 | Amundson et al. | Dec 1994 | A |
5376077 | Gomringer | Dec 1994 | A |
5419777 | Hofling | May 1995 | A |
5423745 | Todd et al. | Jun 1995 | A |
5443078 | Uflacker | Aug 1995 | A |
5443446 | Shturman | Aug 1995 | A |
5443496 | Schwartz et al. | Aug 1995 | A |
5449372 | Schmaltz et al. | Sep 1995 | A |
5449373 | Pinchasik et al. | Sep 1995 | A |
5456666 | Campbell et al. | Oct 1995 | A |
5456667 | Ham et al. | Oct 1995 | A |
5458568 | Racchini et al. | Oct 1995 | A |
5460607 | Miyata et al. | Oct 1995 | A |
5470314 | Walinsky | Nov 1995 | A |
5501694 | Ressemann et al. | Mar 1996 | A |
5524635 | Uflacker et al. | Jun 1996 | A |
5527282 | Segal | Jun 1996 | A |
5536178 | Novelli | Jul 1996 | A |
5538504 | Linden et al. | Jul 1996 | A |
5545132 | Fagan et al. | Aug 1996 | A |
5556405 | Lary | Sep 1996 | A |
5556408 | Farhat | Sep 1996 | A |
5562620 | Klein et al. | Oct 1996 | A |
5569195 | Saab | Oct 1996 | A |
5571086 | Kaplan et al. | Nov 1996 | A |
5571523 | Lee et al. | Nov 1996 | A |
5607442 | Fischell et al. | Mar 1997 | A |
5609574 | Kaplan et al. | Mar 1997 | A |
5616149 | Barath | Apr 1997 | A |
5620457 | Pinchasik et al. | Apr 1997 | A |
5624433 | Radisch et al. | Apr 1997 | A |
5628746 | Clayman | May 1997 | A |
5628755 | Heller et al. | May 1997 | A |
5643210 | Iacob | Jul 1997 | A |
5649941 | Lary | Jul 1997 | A |
5681281 | Vigil et al. | Oct 1997 | A |
5690642 | Osborne et al. | Nov 1997 | A |
5695469 | Segal | Dec 1997 | A |
5697944 | Lary | Dec 1997 | A |
5697971 | Fischell et al. | Dec 1997 | A |
5702410 | Klunder et al. | Dec 1997 | A |
5707385 | Williams | Jan 1998 | A |
5713863 | Vigil et al. | Feb 1998 | A |
5713913 | Lary et al. | Feb 1998 | A |
5730698 | Fischell et al. | Mar 1998 | A |
5733303 | Israel et al. | Mar 1998 | A |
5735816 | Lieber et al. | Apr 1998 | A |
5742019 | Radisch et al. | Apr 1998 | A |
5746716 | Vigil et al. | May 1998 | A |
5746968 | Radisch et al. | May 1998 | A |
5755708 | Segal | May 1998 | A |
5755778 | Kleshinski | May 1998 | A |
5755781 | Jayaraman | May 1998 | A |
5766201 | Ravenscroft et al. | Jun 1998 | A |
5766238 | Lau et al. | Jun 1998 | A |
5772681 | Leoni | Jun 1998 | A |
5776141 | Klein et al. | Jul 1998 | A |
5776181 | Lee et al. | Jul 1998 | A |
5779698 | Clayman et al. | Jul 1998 | A |
5792144 | Fischell et al. | Aug 1998 | A |
5792415 | Hijlkema | Aug 1998 | A |
5797935 | Barath | Aug 1998 | A |
5800450 | Lary et al. | Sep 1998 | A |
5807355 | Ramzipoor et al. | Sep 1998 | A |
5810767 | Klein | Sep 1998 | A |
5814061 | Osborne et al. | Sep 1998 | A |
5827321 | Roubin et al. | Oct 1998 | A |
5863284 | Klein | Jan 1999 | A |
5868708 | Hart et al. | Feb 1999 | A |
5868719 | Tsukernik | Feb 1999 | A |
5868779 | Ruiz | Feb 1999 | A |
5868783 | Tower | Feb 1999 | A |
5869284 | Cao et al. | Feb 1999 | A |
5873852 | Vigil et al. | Feb 1999 | A |
5891090 | Thornton | Apr 1999 | A |
5893840 | Hull et al. | Apr 1999 | A |
5902475 | Trozera et al. | May 1999 | A |
5904679 | Clayman | May 1999 | A |
5904698 | Thomas et al. | May 1999 | A |
5906639 | Rudnick et al. | May 1999 | A |
5916166 | Reiss et al. | Jun 1999 | A |
5919200 | Stambaugh et al. | Jul 1999 | A |
5954742 | Osypka | Sep 1999 | A |
5961490 | Adams | Oct 1999 | A |
5967984 | Chu et al. | Oct 1999 | A |
5980486 | Enger | Nov 1999 | A |
5987661 | Peterson | Nov 1999 | A |
5994667 | Merdan et al. | Nov 1999 | A |
6004295 | Langer et al. | Dec 1999 | A |
6013055 | Bampos et al. | Jan 2000 | A |
6036686 | Griswold | Mar 2000 | A |
6036689 | Tu et al. | Mar 2000 | A |
6036708 | Sciver | Mar 2000 | A |
6048356 | Ravenscroft et al. | Apr 2000 | A |
6053913 | Tu et al. | Apr 2000 | A |
6059811 | Pinchasik et al. | May 2000 | A |
6071285 | Lashinski et al. | Jun 2000 | A |
6071286 | Mawad | Jun 2000 | A |
6077298 | Tu et al. | Jun 2000 | A |
RE36764 | Zacca et al. | Jul 2000 | E |
6102904 | Vigil et al. | Aug 2000 | A |
6106548 | Roubin et al. | Aug 2000 | A |
6117104 | Fitz | Sep 2000 | A |
6117153 | Lary et al. | Sep 2000 | A |
6123718 | Tu et al. | Sep 2000 | A |
6129706 | Janacek | Oct 2000 | A |
6129708 | Enger | Oct 2000 | A |
6136011 | Stambaugh | Oct 2000 | A |
6146323 | Fischell | Nov 2000 | A |
6152944 | Holman et al. | Nov 2000 | A |
6156254 | Andrews et al. | Dec 2000 | A |
6156265 | Sugimoto | Dec 2000 | A |
6165187 | Reger | Dec 2000 | A |
6190356 | Bersin | Feb 2001 | B1 |
6190403 | Fischell et al. | Feb 2001 | B1 |
6193686 | Estrada et al. | Feb 2001 | B1 |
6197013 | Reed et al. | Mar 2001 | B1 |
6203569 | Wijay | Mar 2001 | B1 |
6206910 | Berry et al. | Mar 2001 | B1 |
6210392 | Vigil et al. | Apr 2001 | B1 |
6211247 | Goodman | Apr 2001 | B1 |
6224625 | Jayaraman | May 2001 | B1 |
6235043 | Reiley et al. | May 2001 | B1 |
6241762 | Shanley | Jun 2001 | B1 |
6245040 | Inderbitzen et al. | Jun 2001 | B1 |
6258087 | Edwards et al. | Jul 2001 | B1 |
6258108 | Lary | Jul 2001 | B1 |
6261319 | Kveen et al. | Jul 2001 | B1 |
6280411 | Lennox | Aug 2001 | B1 |
6283947 | Mirzaee | Sep 2001 | B1 |
6283951 | Flaherty et al. | Sep 2001 | B1 |
6287336 | Globerman et al. | Sep 2001 | B1 |
6289568 | Miller et al. | Sep 2001 | B1 |
6296651 | Lary et al. | Oct 2001 | B1 |
6299604 | Ragheb et al. | Oct 2001 | B1 |
6306151 | Lary | Oct 2001 | B1 |
6306166 | Barry et al. | Oct 2001 | B1 |
6309414 | Rolando et al. | Oct 2001 | B1 |
6312459 | Huang et al. | Nov 2001 | B1 |
6319229 | Kim et al. | Nov 2001 | B1 |
6319230 | Palasis et al. | Nov 2001 | B1 |
6319242 | Patterson et al. | Nov 2001 | B1 |
6319251 | Tu et al. | Nov 2001 | B1 |
6325779 | Zedler | Dec 2001 | B1 |
6325813 | Hektner | Dec 2001 | B1 |
6332880 | Yang et al. | Dec 2001 | B1 |
6355013 | van Muiden | Mar 2002 | B1 |
6355059 | Richter et al. | Mar 2002 | B1 |
6361545 | Macoviak et al. | Mar 2002 | B1 |
6364856 | Ding et al. | Apr 2002 | B1 |
6371961 | Osborne et al. | Apr 2002 | B1 |
6394995 | Solar et al. | May 2002 | B1 |
6415009 | Toporov et al. | Jul 2002 | B1 |
6416494 | Wilkins | Jul 2002 | B1 |
6416539 | Hassdenteufel | Jul 2002 | B1 |
6419692 | Yang et al. | Jul 2002 | B1 |
6425882 | Vigil | Jul 2002 | B1 |
6425908 | Ravenscroft et al. | Jul 2002 | B2 |
6440158 | Saab | Aug 2002 | B1 |
6447501 | Solar et al. | Sep 2002 | B1 |
6450988 | Bradshaw | Sep 2002 | B1 |
6450989 | Dubrul et al. | Sep 2002 | B2 |
6454775 | Demarais et al. | Sep 2002 | B1 |
6471979 | New et al. | Oct 2002 | B2 |
6475233 | Trozera | Nov 2002 | B2 |
6475234 | Richter et al. | Nov 2002 | B1 |
6475236 | Roubin et al. | Nov 2002 | B1 |
6478807 | Foreman et al. | Nov 2002 | B1 |
6500186 | Lafontaine et al. | Dec 2002 | B2 |
6515099 | Sato et al. | Feb 2003 | B2 |
6517765 | Kelley | Feb 2003 | B1 |
6540722 | Boyle et al. | Apr 2003 | B1 |
6551310 | Ganz et al. | Apr 2003 | B1 |
6554795 | Bagaoisan et al. | Apr 2003 | B2 |
6562062 | Jenusaitis et al. | May 2003 | B2 |
6565528 | Mueller | May 2003 | B1 |
6569180 | Sirhan et al. | May 2003 | B1 |
6575993 | Yock | Jun 2003 | B1 |
6592548 | Jayaraman | Jul 2003 | B2 |
6602281 | Klein | Aug 2003 | B1 |
6605107 | Klein | Aug 2003 | B1 |
6607442 | Ogata et al. | Aug 2003 | B2 |
6613072 | Lau et al. | Sep 2003 | B2 |
6616650 | Rowe | Sep 2003 | B1 |
6616678 | Nishtala et al. | Sep 2003 | B2 |
6626861 | Hart et al. | Sep 2003 | B1 |
6632231 | Radisch et al. | Oct 2003 | B2 |
6648912 | Trout et al. | Nov 2003 | B2 |
6652548 | Evans et al. | Nov 2003 | B2 |
6656156 | Yang et al. | Dec 2003 | B2 |
6656351 | Boyle | Dec 2003 | B2 |
6663660 | Dusbabek et al. | Dec 2003 | B2 |
6682545 | Kester | Jan 2004 | B1 |
6695813 | Boyle et al. | Feb 2004 | B1 |
6730064 | Ragheb et al. | May 2004 | B2 |
6743196 | Barbut et al. | Jun 2004 | B2 |
6746463 | Schwartz | Jun 2004 | B1 |
6783542 | Eidenschink | Aug 2004 | B2 |
6840950 | Stanford et al. | Jan 2005 | B2 |
6872206 | Edwards et al. | Mar 2005 | B2 |
6918920 | Wang et al. | Jul 2005 | B1 |
6939320 | Lennox | Sep 2005 | B2 |
6942680 | Grayzel et al. | Sep 2005 | B2 |
6951566 | Lary | Oct 2005 | B2 |
7011654 | Dubrul et al. | Mar 2006 | B2 |
7011670 | Radisch et al. | Mar 2006 | B2 |
7029483 | Schwartz | Apr 2006 | B2 |
7060051 | Palasis | Jun 2006 | B2 |
7108684 | Farnan | Sep 2006 | B2 |
7131981 | Appling et al. | Nov 2006 | B2 |
7172609 | Radisch et al. | Feb 2007 | B2 |
7186237 | Meyer et al. | Mar 2007 | B2 |
7232432 | Fulton et al. | Jun 2007 | B2 |
7303572 | Melsheimer et al. | Dec 2007 | B2 |
7354445 | Nicholson et al. | Apr 2008 | B2 |
7357813 | Burgermeister | Apr 2008 | B2 |
7396358 | Appling et al. | Jul 2008 | B2 |
7445792 | Toner et al. | Nov 2008 | B2 |
7445795 | Bakhshaee et al. | Nov 2008 | B2 |
7455652 | Laird | Nov 2008 | B2 |
7465311 | Wang et al. | Dec 2008 | B2 |
7494497 | Weber | Feb 2009 | B2 |
7517352 | Evans et al. | Apr 2009 | B2 |
7524319 | Dubrul | Apr 2009 | B2 |
7566319 | McAuley et al. | Jul 2009 | B2 |
7686824 | Konstantino et al. | Mar 2010 | B2 |
7691119 | Farnan | Apr 2010 | B2 |
7708748 | Weisenburgh, II et al. | May 2010 | B2 |
7708753 | Hardert | May 2010 | B2 |
7736375 | Crow | Jun 2010 | B2 |
7763043 | Goodin et al. | Jul 2010 | B2 |
7780715 | Shaked et al. | Aug 2010 | B2 |
7780798 | Stinson et al. | Aug 2010 | B2 |
7803149 | Bates et al. | Sep 2010 | B2 |
7811622 | Bates et al. | Oct 2010 | B2 |
7875284 | Reyes et al. | Jan 2011 | B2 |
7931663 | Farnan et al. | Apr 2011 | B2 |
7955350 | Konstantino et al. | Jun 2011 | B2 |
7963942 | Chen | Jun 2011 | B2 |
7976557 | Kunis | Jul 2011 | B2 |
7998184 | Eidenschink | Aug 2011 | B2 |
8043259 | Radisch et al. | Oct 2011 | B2 |
8052703 | St. Martin et al. | Nov 2011 | B2 |
8066726 | Kelley | Nov 2011 | B2 |
8080026 | Konstantino et al. | Dec 2011 | B2 |
8123770 | Olsen et al. | Feb 2012 | B2 |
8192675 | Burton et al. | Jun 2012 | B2 |
8221444 | Wang et al. | Jul 2012 | B2 |
8323307 | Hardert | Dec 2012 | B2 |
8348987 | Eaton | Jan 2013 | B2 |
8382820 | Addonizio et al. | Feb 2013 | B2 |
8454637 | Aggerholm et al. | Jun 2013 | B2 |
8574248 | Kassab | Nov 2013 | B2 |
8673387 | Bates et al. | Mar 2014 | B2 |
8685050 | Schur et al. | Apr 2014 | B2 |
8685990 | Coats et al. | Apr 2014 | B2 |
9011896 | Speck | Apr 2015 | B2 |
9072812 | Speck | Jul 2015 | B2 |
9078951 | Speck | Jul 2015 | B2 |
9101684 | Speck | Aug 2015 | B2 |
9173977 | Speck | Nov 2015 | B2 |
9629942 | Speck | Apr 2017 | B2 |
9770536 | Speck et al. | Sep 2017 | B2 |
20010001113 | Lim et al. | May 2001 | A1 |
20010001823 | Ryan | May 2001 | A1 |
20010007082 | Dusbabek et al. | Jul 2001 | A1 |
20010012950 | Nishtala et al. | Aug 2001 | A1 |
20010016753 | Caprio et al. | Aug 2001 | A1 |
20020010487 | Evans et al. | Jan 2002 | A1 |
20020010489 | Grayzel et al. | Jan 2002 | A1 |
20020029015 | Camenzind et al. | Mar 2002 | A1 |
20020037358 | Barry et al. | Mar 2002 | A1 |
20020038144 | Trout et al. | Mar 2002 | A1 |
20020045930 | Burg et al. | Apr 2002 | A1 |
20020065548 | Birdsall et al. | May 2002 | A1 |
20020091438 | Trozera | Jul 2002 | A1 |
20020111633 | Stoltze et al. | Aug 2002 | A1 |
20020165599 | Nasralla | Nov 2002 | A1 |
20020193873 | Brucker et al. | Dec 2002 | A1 |
20030018376 | Solar et al. | Jan 2003 | A1 |
20030023200 | Barbut et al. | Jan 2003 | A1 |
20030028235 | McIntosh et al. | Feb 2003 | A1 |
20030032973 | Jenusaitis et al. | Feb 2003 | A1 |
20030065381 | Solar et al. | Apr 2003 | A1 |
20030074046 | Richter | Apr 2003 | A1 |
20030078606 | Lafontaine et al. | Apr 2003 | A1 |
20030097169 | Brucker et al. | May 2003 | A1 |
20030105509 | Jang et al. | Jun 2003 | A1 |
20030114915 | Mareiro et al. | Jun 2003 | A1 |
20030144683 | Sirhan et al. | Jul 2003 | A1 |
20030149468 | Wallsten | Aug 2003 | A1 |
20030152870 | Huang | Aug 2003 | A1 |
20030153870 | Meyer et al. | Aug 2003 | A1 |
20030171799 | Lee et al. | Sep 2003 | A1 |
20030187494 | Loaldi | Oct 2003 | A1 |
20030195609 | Berenstein et al. | Oct 2003 | A1 |
20030199970 | Shanley | Oct 2003 | A1 |
20030199988 | Devonec et al. | Oct 2003 | A1 |
20030208244 | Stein et al. | Nov 2003 | A1 |
20030208255 | O'Shaughnessy et al. | Nov 2003 | A1 |
20040034384 | Fukaya | Feb 2004 | A1 |
20040106975 | Solovay et al. | Jun 2004 | A1 |
20040111108 | Robert Faman | Jun 2004 | A1 |
20040127475 | New et al. | Jul 2004 | A1 |
20040133223 | Weber | Jul 2004 | A1 |
20040143287 | Konstantino et al. | Jul 2004 | A1 |
20040193257 | Wu et al. | Sep 2004 | A1 |
20040208985 | Rowan et al. | Oct 2004 | A1 |
20040210299 | Rogers et al. | Oct 2004 | A1 |
20040230293 | Yip et al. | Nov 2004 | A1 |
20040243158 | Konstantino et al. | Dec 2004 | A1 |
20050010278 | Vardi et al. | Jan 2005 | A1 |
20050021070 | Feld et al. | Jan 2005 | A1 |
20050021071 | Konstantino et al. | Jan 2005 | A1 |
20050033417 | Borges et al. | Feb 2005 | A1 |
20050037048 | Song | Feb 2005 | A1 |
20050070888 | DiMatteo et al. | Mar 2005 | A1 |
20050080478 | Barongan | Apr 2005 | A1 |
20050083768 | Hara | Apr 2005 | A1 |
20050119723 | Peacock | Jun 2005 | A1 |
20050131512 | Vonderwalde | Jun 2005 | A1 |
20050137690 | Salahieh et al. | Jun 2005 | A1 |
20050271844 | Mapes et al. | Dec 2005 | A1 |
20050278021 | Bates et al. | Dec 2005 | A1 |
20050288629 | Kunis | Dec 2005 | A1 |
20060004323 | Chang et al. | Jan 2006 | A1 |
20060015133 | Grayzel et al. | Jan 2006 | A1 |
20060020243 | Speck et al. | Jan 2006 | A1 |
20060074484 | Huber | Apr 2006 | A1 |
20060085025 | Farnan et al. | Apr 2006 | A1 |
20060111736 | Kelley | May 2006 | A1 |
20060112536 | Herweck et al. | Jun 2006 | A1 |
20060129093 | Jackson | Jun 2006 | A1 |
20060149308 | Melsheimer et al. | Jul 2006 | A1 |
20060173487 | Uflacker et al. | Aug 2006 | A1 |
20060184191 | O'Brien | Aug 2006 | A1 |
20060240014 | Sukhatme | Oct 2006 | A1 |
20060247674 | Roman | Nov 2006 | A1 |
20060259005 | Konstantino et al. | Nov 2006 | A1 |
20060259062 | Konstantino | Nov 2006 | A1 |
20060270193 | Hidaka et al. | Nov 2006 | A1 |
20070020380 | Ding | Jan 2007 | A1 |
20070037739 | Wang et al. | Feb 2007 | A1 |
20070112422 | Dehdashtian | May 2007 | A1 |
20070128242 | Zhao | Jun 2007 | A1 |
20070185513 | Woolfson et al. | Aug 2007 | A1 |
20070190103 | Hossainy et al. | Aug 2007 | A1 |
20070198047 | Schon et al. | Aug 2007 | A1 |
20070212394 | Reyes et al. | Sep 2007 | A1 |
20070213808 | Roubin et al. | Sep 2007 | A1 |
20080021385 | Barry et al. | Jan 2008 | A1 |
20080118544 | Wang | May 2008 | A1 |
20080181927 | Zhao | Jul 2008 | A1 |
20080241215 | Falotico et al. | Oct 2008 | A1 |
20080300610 | Chambers | Dec 2008 | A1 |
20090105686 | Snow et al. | Apr 2009 | A1 |
20090105687 | Deckman et al. | Apr 2009 | A1 |
20090136560 | Bates et al. | May 2009 | A1 |
20090246252 | Arps et al. | Oct 2009 | A1 |
20090246253 | Ding | Oct 2009 | A1 |
20090264859 | Mas | Oct 2009 | A1 |
20090281490 | McAuley et al. | Nov 2009 | A1 |
20090306582 | Granada et al. | Dec 2009 | A1 |
20100042121 | Schneider et al. | Feb 2010 | A1 |
20100121372 | Farnan | May 2010 | A1 |
20100179647 | Carpenter et al. | Jul 2010 | A1 |
20100209472 | Wang | Aug 2010 | A1 |
20100233228 | Speck | Sep 2010 | A1 |
20100233236 | Zhao | Sep 2010 | A1 |
20100278997 | Speck et al. | Nov 2010 | A1 |
20100285085 | Stankus et al. | Nov 2010 | A1 |
20100286720 | Shaked et al. | Nov 2010 | A1 |
20100286721 | Goodin et al. | Nov 2010 | A1 |
20100324645 | Stankus et al. | Dec 2010 | A1 |
20110054396 | Kangas et al. | Mar 2011 | A1 |
20110082483 | Diamant et al. | Apr 2011 | A1 |
20110125247 | Farnan et al. | May 2011 | A1 |
20110143014 | Stankus et al. | Jun 2011 | A1 |
20110160756 | Aggerholm et al. | Jun 2011 | A1 |
20110196340 | Barry et al. | Aug 2011 | A1 |
20110230818 | Kunis | Sep 2011 | A1 |
20110264039 | Thielen et al. | Oct 2011 | A1 |
20110270177 | Chambers et al. | Nov 2011 | A1 |
20110295200 | Speck et al. | Dec 2011 | A1 |
20120059401 | Konstantino et al. | Mar 2012 | A1 |
20120172787 | McClain et al. | Jul 2012 | A1 |
20120215251 | Burton et al. | Aug 2012 | A1 |
20120239001 | Barry et al. | Sep 2012 | A1 |
20120277626 | Burbank et al. | Nov 2012 | A1 |
20130023817 | Speck et al. | Jan 2013 | A1 |
20130037777 | Mikawa et al. | Feb 2013 | A1 |
20130041315 | Speck | Feb 2013 | A1 |
20130041391 | Spencer et al. | Feb 2013 | A1 |
20130041399 | Hardert | Feb 2013 | A1 |
20130046237 | Speck et al. | Feb 2013 | A1 |
20130060127 | Burton et al. | Mar 2013 | A1 |
20130066346 | Pigott | Mar 2013 | A1 |
20130096604 | Hanson et al. | Apr 2013 | A1 |
20130150874 | Kassab | Jun 2013 | A1 |
20130211381 | Feld | Aug 2013 | A1 |
20130218181 | Feld et al. | Aug 2013 | A1 |
20130231638 | Speck et al. | Sep 2013 | A1 |
20140058358 | Kassab | Feb 2014 | A1 |
20140066960 | Feld et al. | Mar 2014 | A1 |
20140128801 | Speck et al. | May 2014 | A1 |
20140257181 | Speck | Sep 2014 | A1 |
20150297797 | Speck et al. | Oct 2015 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
1688350 | Oct 2005 | CN |
104689377 | Jun 2015 | CN |
0565796 | May 1997 | EP |
0623315 | Jun 1999 | EP |
1169970 | Jan 2002 | EP |
1179323 | Feb 2002 | EP |
0832608 | Mar 2003 | EP |
1042997 | Mar 2005 | EP |
1581298 | Aug 2006 | EP |
1414373 | May 2008 | EP |
1337198 | Jun 2009 | EP |
1748816 | Jul 2010 | EP |
2063924 | Oct 2010 | EP |
2283890 | Feb 2011 | EP |
1962696 | Mar 2012 | EP |
1737530 | Mar 2013 | EP |
2564890 | Mar 2013 | EP |
2886136 | Jun 2015 | EP |
2886137 | Jun 2015 | EP |
2002126086 | May 2002 | JP |
2002126086 | May 2002 | JP |
2004148013 | May 2004 | JP |
2008504059 | May 2005 | JP |
2005343897 | Dec 2005 | JP |
5745030 | Jun 2013 | JP |
WO1991002494 | Mar 1991 | WO |
9217118 | Oct 1992 | WO |
WO1993001753 | Feb 1993 | WO |
WO1994010919 | May 1994 | WO |
1994023787 | Oct 1994 | WO |
WO1994023787 | Oct 1994 | WO |
WO1994024946 | Nov 1994 | WO |
WO1995003083 | Feb 1995 | WO |
WO1998005377 | Feb 1998 | WO |
WO1998045506 | Oct 1998 | WO |
1999017680 | Apr 1999 | WO |
1999055253 | Nov 1999 | WO |
1999062430 | Dec 1999 | WO |
02083011 | Oct 2002 | WO |
2002076509 | Oct 2002 | WO |
WO2002083011 | Oct 2002 | WO |
WO2003026536 | Apr 2003 | WO |
WO2003039628 | May 2003 | WO |
WO2003041760 | May 2003 | WO |
2004022124 | Mar 2004 | WO |
2004028582 | Apr 2004 | WO |
WO2004028610 | Apr 2004 | WO |
WO2004060460 | Jul 2004 | WO |
WO2004066852 | Aug 2004 | WO |
2004108130 | Dec 2004 | WO |
WO2005025458 | Mar 2005 | WO |
2006007173 | Jan 2006 | WO |
2009018816 | Feb 2009 | WO |
2009066330 | May 2009 | WO |
2009155405 | Dec 2009 | WO |
2013177175 | Nov 2013 | WO |
Entry |
---|
Cremers et al. Comparison of Two Different Paclitaxel-Coated Balloon Catheters in the Porcine Coronary Restenosis Model; Clin Res Cardiol (2009) 98:325-350; DOI 10.1007/s00392-009-0008-2. |
EP Examination Report dated Oct. 9, 2013 from corresponding EP Application No. 10775805.4, 6 pages. |
European Search Opinion issued in EP Application No. 15154222, dated May 18, 2015, 5 pages. |
European search report and search opinion dated May 4, 2010 for EP 06770116.9. |
European search report and search opinion dated Dec. 28, 2009 for EP 05792875.6. |
European Search Report issued in EP Application No. 15154222 dated May 18, 2015. 2 pages. |
Extended European Search Report issued in EP Application No. 11827369.7, dated Apr. 7, 2014. 6 pages. |
File History for U.S. Appl. No. 11/411,635, filed Apr. 26, 2006. |
File History for U.S. Appl. No. 13/044,425, filed Mar. 9, 2011. |
File History for U.S. Appl. No. 13/842,080, filed Mar. 15, 2013. |
First Examination Report dated Feb. 5, 2014 from corresponding EP Application No. 05733012.8. |
International search report and written opinion dated Feb. 27, 2007 for PCT/US2006/017872. |
International search report and written opinion dated May 23, 2006 for PCT /2005/009571. |
International search report and written opinion dated Jul. 26, 2007 for PCT/2005/028809. |
International search report and written opinion dated Nov. 4, 2004 for PCT/2004/000177. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion issued in PCT Application No. PCTEP2010066754 dated May 1, 2011, 11 pages. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion issued in PCT/US2011/052392 dated Jan. 11, 2012, 7 pages. |
International Search Report issued in PCT/US2002/035547 dated May 20, 2003 , 3 Pages. |
International Search Report issued in PCT/US2004/027836 dated Dec. 30, 2004 , 1 Page. |
Japanese office action dated Jul. 9, 2010 for JP 2007-505113. (in Japanese with English translation). |
Notification of Office Action dated Aug. 14, 2014 from corresponding JP Application No. 2013-505347. |
Notification of the First Office Action dated Jan. 16, 2014, from corresponding Chinese Application No. 201080066293.3. |
Scheller et al. Paclitaxel Balloon Coating, A Novel Method for Prevention and Therapy of Restenosis; Circulation. 2004;110:810-814, Aug. 9, 2004. |
Supplementary European Search Report dated Nov. 20, 2013 from corresponding EP Application No. 05733012.8. |
Suzuki et al. Anti-Oxidants for Therapeutic Use: Why Are Only a Few Drugs in Clinical Use? Advanced Drug Delivery Reviews, vol. 61, 2009, pp. 287-289. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20170340778 A1 | Nov 2017 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 14877284 | Oct 2015 | US |
Child | 15664941 | US | |
Parent | 13628627 | Sep 2012 | US |
Child | 14877284 | US | |
Parent | PCT/EP2011/056179 | Apr 2011 | US |
Child | 13628627 | US |