Coating method for modifying adhesion of thin films to substrates

Information

  • Patent Grant
  • 6534114
  • Patent Number
    6,534,114
  • Date Filed
    Wednesday, February 28, 2001
    23 years ago
  • Date Issued
    Tuesday, March 18, 2003
    21 years ago
Abstract
A method is taught for that allows for controlling and optimizing the level of adhesion between a multilayer composite applied to a support web. The method comprises the steps of selecting the support web with or without a subbing layer applied thereto; selecting an organic solvent that is substantially free of other constituents as a carrier layer; forming a multilayer composite including the carrier layer, the carrier layer being the lowermost layer thereof; applying the multilayer composite to the support web or the subbing layer; drying the multilayer composite on the support web, the carrier layer evaporating from the multilayer composite; testing the adhesive strength between the support web or subbing layer and the multilayer composite after drying; and repeating these steps until a desired level of adhesion is found.
Description




FIELD OF THE INVENTION




This invention relates generally to methods for coating a moving web and, more particularly, to controlling adhesion levels between the moving web and the coating applied thereto, and most particularly, to controlling adhesion levels between photographic film base web and the multilayer coatings applied thereto.




BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION




Multilayer coating is well known in the prior art as described, for example, in U.S. Pat. No. 2,761,791 to Russell. In the method typically referred to as slide bead coating, a multilayer composite comprised of superimposed individual liquid layers is delivered to the moving substrate through the use of a coating die. At the end of the coating die, the layers form a continuous liquid bridge or coating bead between the die and the moving substrate. The slide bead coating method is useful for making thin, highly uniform, composite elements suitable for numerous applications, including photographic, thermographic, x-ray, and photoelectric films, among others.




Various methods are known in the prior art to promote adhesion between the support and applied layers. In most cases, an adhesive layer or subbing layer is required on a support prior to application of the functional layers. There are a number of disclosures describing unique chemical compositions suitable for subbing layers. U.S. Pat. No. 4,748,150 to Vanier teaches the use of a vinylidene chloride copolymer as a subbing layer to promote the adhesion of a subsequent layer containing a polycarbonate. Alternatively, a support may be subjected to electrical discharge pretreatments including corona discharge as described in U.S. Pat. No. 3,376,208 to Wood, glow discharge as described in U.S. Pat. No. 5,425,980 to Grace, or electron-beam irradiation U.S. Pat. No. 4,594,262 to Kreil. More commonly, a substrate requires a combination of electrical treatment and the application of a subbing layer to achieve good adhesion such as, for example, described for example in U.S. Pat. No. 4,128,426 to Ohta, U.S. Pat. No. 4,689,359 to Ponicello, and U.S. Pat. No. 5,232,825 to Hattori.




The equipment required for electrical treatment of substrates, such as those described above, is expensive and adds complexity to the manufacturing process. Moreover, such treatments may not be suitable for some coatings when layers are sensitive to chemical alteration of the support by electrical treatment. Similarly, the materials required for an effective subbing layer may be expensive or difficult to identify. There are no known coating methods describing enhancement of adhesion of a functional layer to the support.




Finally, it is sometimes desirable to attenuate the adhesive strength of a functional layer to the support depending on product requirements. In most cases, strong adhesion between applied layers and support is needed. However, some products, such as those designed to delaminate during usage, may require only weak adhesive strength. Continuous modification of the chemistry of the subbing layer to achieve such aims may be expensive and time consuming.




SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION




It is therefore an object of the present invention to provide a method for controlling the level of adhesion between a web and a coating applied thereto.




It is a further object of the present invention to provide a method for applying multilayer coatings to moving webs which allows for modification of adhesion levels between the moving web and the multilayer coating.




Briefly stated, the foregoing and numerous other features, objects and advantages of the present invention will become readily apparent upon a review of the detailed description, claims and drawings set forth herein. These features, objects and advantages are accomplished by selecting the support web with or without a subbing layer applied thereto; selecting an organic solvent that is substantially free of other constituents as a carrier layer; forming a multilayer composite including the carrier layer, the carrier layer being the lowermost layer thereof; applying the multilayer composite to the support web or the subbing layer; drying the multilayer composite on the support web, the carrier layer evaporating from the multilayer composite; testing the adhesive strength between the support web or subbing layer and the multilayer composite after drying; and repeating these steps until a desired level of adhesion is found. The method of the present invention may be practiced in conjunction with slide bead coating apparatus, extrusion hopper coating apparatus, and curtain coating apparatus. In a slide bead coating operation, the multilayer composite flows down the slide surface of the slide bead coating hopper and over a coating lip of the coating hopper to form a coating bead bridging the gap between the lip in the moving web. In this manner, the multilayer composite is applied to the support web or the subbing layer. The carrier layer preferably has a viscosity in the range of 1-10 cp and is applied at a wet thickness in the range of 1-20 μm; flowing the multilayer composite down the slide surface and over a coating lip of the coating hopper; and forming a coating bead between the coating lip and the web.




In the practice of the method of the present invention, one or more of the upper layers preferably has a viscosity that is greater than the viscosity of the carrier layer. When the carrier layer is formed of a blend of organic solvents, preferably at least two of the following components: methanol, ethanol, isopropanol, n-butanol, acetone, methylethyl ketone, methylisobutyl ketone, toluene and methylene chloride are contained in the blend. It is also preferred that the layers above the carrier layer contain at least one of the following polymeric materials: cellulosics, polyvinylbutyrals, polycarbonates, polyurethanes and polyesters. Further, in the practice of the method of the present invention, it is preferred that the layers above the carrier layer have a combined wet thickness in the range of range of 1-500 μm and at least one of such upper layers has a viscosity in the range of 10-5,000 cp. In addition, one or more of such upper layers may include water.




As mentioned above, the present invention allows for the control of the level of adhesion between the multilayer composite and the web such that the physical bond therebetween is strong or weak. In particular, the use of the present invention is shown to substantially improve the adhesion of a functional layer to the substrate. Moreover, this advantage is achieved without chemical modification of the support through the use of electrical discharge treatments. Finally, this advantage is achieved without the use of permanent chemical additives in the coated layer. Such additives may be expensive or detrimental to the properties of the final film.




Although the present invention is discussed herein with particular reference to a slide bead coating operation, those skilled in the art will understand that the present invention can be advantageously practiced with other coating operations. For example, the control of the level of adhesion should also be achievable with multilayer extrusion hopper coating operations and multilayer curtain coating operations. In addition, those skilled in the art will recognize that the present invention can be advantageously practiced with carrier layers containing additives such as polymers, surfactants, and etching agents. Practical applications of the present invention include photographic, thermographic and x-ray films as well as photographic, thermographic and inkjet papers, among others.











BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS





FIG. 1

is a schematic of an exemplary multi-slot slide bead coating apparatus which may be used in the practice of the method of the present invention.











DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE INVENTION




Turning to

FIG. 1

, there is shown a schematic of an exemplary and well known multi-slot slide bead coating apparatus


10


suitable for practicing the method of the present invention. The multi-slot slide bead coating apparatus


10


is typically used to deliver and coat multiple coating compositions simultaneously as a stacked composite of layers. Coating hopper


10


is shown as having only four slots, but multiple slot hoppers


10


may have fewer than four slots and are also known to deliver a composite layer comprised of five or six (or even more) coating composition layers.




Coating hopper


10


, shown in side elevational cross-section, includes a front section


12


, a second section


14


, a third section


16


, a fourth section


18


, and a back plate


20


. There is an inlet


22


into second section


14


for supplying coating liquid to first metering slot


24


via pump


26


to thereby form a lowermost layer or carrier layer


28


. There is an inlet


30


into third section


16


for supplying coating liquid to second metering slot


32


via pump


34


to form layer


36


. There is an inlet


38


into fourth section


18


for supplying coating liquid to third metering slot


40


via pump


42


to form layer


44


. There is an inlet


46


into back plate


20


for supplying coating liquid to fourth metering slot


48


via pump


50


to form layer


52


. Each slot


24


,


32


,


40


,


48


includes a transverse distribution cavity. Front section


12


includes an inclined slide surface


54


, and a coating lip


56


. There is a second inclined slide surface


58


at the top of second section


14


. There is a third inclined slide surface


60


at the top of third section


16


. There is a fourth inclined slide surface


62


at the top of fourth section


18


. Back plate


20


extends above inclined slide surface


62


to form a back land surface


64


.




Residing adjacent the hopper


10


is a coating backing roller


66


about which a web


70


is conveyed. Typically, the hopper


10


is movable from a non-coating position toward the coating backing roller


66


and into a coating position.




In the practice of the method of the present invention, the lowermost or carrier layer


28


is an organic solvent or blend of organic solvents that is substantially free of other constituents. The term “substantially free of other constituents” as used herein is intended to mean that the organic solvent or blend of organic solvents have a purity level of at least 98% and that any contaminants or additives present do not affect the viscosity of the carrier layer


28


. This lowermost layer or carrier layer


28


which is metered through the first metering slot


24


, moves down the first slide surface


54


, and wets the moving web


70


at the point where the coating bead


72


contacts the web


70


. In a preferred embodiment of the present invention, the lowermost layer


28


is an organic solvent or blend of organic solvents having a viscosity of less than 10 cp., a surface tension of less than 40 dynes/cm, and a wet thickness range of from about 1 to about 20 μm on the moving web


70


.




As mentioned above, the lowermost layer


28


may be comprised of a single organic solvent. Examples of suitable organic solvents at 20° C. include methanol (0.6 cp.), acetone (0.3 cp.), methylethyl ketone (0.4 cp.), methyl isobutyl ketone (0.6 cp.), methylene chloride (0.4 cp.), toluene (0.6 cp.), methyl acetate (0.4 cp.), ethyl acetate (0.5 cp.), isopropyl acetate (0.5 cp.), n-propyl acetate (0.6 cp.), ethanol (1.2 cp.), n-propanol (2.3 cp.) and n-butanol (3.0 cp.).




Alternatively, the lowermost layer


28


may be comprised of a combination of two or more organic solvents. Examples of suitable organic solvent blends at 20° C. include 1.1 methanol:methylene chloride (0.6 cp.), 1:1 acetone:methanol (0.4 cp.), 1:1:1 acetone:methanol:methylene chloride (0.5 cp.), 1:1 acetone:n-propanol (0.6 cp.), 1:1 acetone:ethanol (0.5 cp.), 1:1 methanol:ethanol (0.7 cp.), 1:1 methylene chloride:ethanol (0.8 cp.), 1:1:1 acetone:methylene chloride:ethanol (0.5 cp.), 1:1:1 methanol:methlylene chloride:n-butanol (0.8 cp.), 1:1:1 acetone:ethanol:n-butanol (0.8 cp.), 1:1:1 methanol:methylene chloride:ethanol (0.8 cp.), and 1:1:1:1 acetone:methanol:methylene chloride:n-propanol (0.6 cp.). For these examples, solvent ratios are by weight.




The second liquid layer


36


which is metered through a second metering slot


32


, moves down the second slide surface


58


, and is accelerated by the carrier layer


28


down the first slide surface


54


to the coating bead


72


. The second layer


36


must be miscible with lowermost layer


28


and is therefore preferably organic, but may contain water. As noted by layers


44


,


52


in

FIG. 1

, additional upper layers may also be applied using the slide bead coating apparatus


10


. These additional upper layers may be of a distinct composition relative to the second layer


36


or of the same composition. Similarly, the number of upper layers may also be further increased beyond three by extension of the number of die slots (not shown explicitly in FIG.


1


). In a preferred embodiment of the present invention, the upper layers have a combined wet thickness in the range of from about 1 to about 500 μm, and at least one of the upper layers has a viscosity greater than 10 cp.




Because the method of the present invention may involve application of highly volatile organic solvents, the temperature at which coating is performed is preferably less than or equal to 25° C. to avoid non-uniformities due to streaks and mottle. Methylene chloride, acetone, methyl acetate and methanol are examples of highly volatile organic solvents having a vapor pressure above 100 mm Hg at 25° C.




The method of the present invention is suitable for application of multilayer coatings to a variety of substrates such as polyethylene terephthalate (PET), cellulose acetate (CA), polycarbonate, polystyrene, and other polymeric films. Additional substrates may include paper, laminates of paper and polymeric films, glass, cloth, aluminum and other metal supports. In some cases, substrates may be pretreated with subbing layers or electrical discharge devices. Substrates may also be pretreated with functional layers containing various binders and addenda.




The advantages of the present invention are demonstrated by the following practical examples given below.




EXAMPLE 1




The apparatus


10


illustrated in

FIG. 1

, was used to apply three organic layers to a moving substrate


70


of untreated polyethylene terephthalate (PET). All coating fluids were comprised of a polyvinylburyral (hydroxyl content of 12%) dissolved in 1:1 methanol:ethanol. The lowermost layer


28


was a variety of organic solvents having a wet thickness in the range of 2.5-7.5 μM. The organic solvents used as carrier layer


28


in this Example included ethanol, methylethyl ketone, and methylene chloride. The second and third layers each had a viscosity of 600 cp. and a combined final wet thickness of 30 μm on the moving web


70


. Coatings were applied at a temperature of 23.9° C. The gap between the coating lip


56


and the moving web


70


was 200 μm. The pressure differential across the coating bead


72


was adjusted between 0-10 cm of water to establish a uniform coating. For Example 1, the substrate was untreated polyethylene terephthalate (PET). Coatings were made at substrate speeds of 100 cm/s without defects resulting from entrained air or streaks. Finished samples were analyzed for adhesive strength. Results are summarized in Table 1. As shown in Table 1, adhesive strength is greater on untreated PET when films were prepared with methylene chloride or methylethyl ketone as the carrier layer. In some cases, adhesive strength was more than doubled. For example, the adhesive strength of the polyvinylbutyral layer increased from 2 to 5 N/m on an untreated PET support having no subbing layer when the organic solvent used in the lowermost layer


28


was changed from ethanol to methylene chloride.




EXAMPLE 2




The conditions were identical to those described in Example 1, except that the PET substrate was modified by various subbing layers. In Example 2, PET was precoated with a subbing layer of either cellulose acetate butyrate (CAB) having 38% butryl content or nitrocellulose having 12% nitrogen as noted in Table 1. A coating of polyvinylbutyral was subsequently coated on to the modified PET, dried and tested for adhesive strength as described in Example 1 above. The results are summarized in Table 1. As shown in Table 1, adhesive strength was greater on PET supports having a subbing layer of CAB when films are prepared using methylene chloride or methylethyl ketone as the carrier layer. In some cases, adhesive strength was improved by more than ten fold. For example, the adhesive strength increased from 10 to 160 N/m on a PET support having a subbing layer of CAB when the organic solvent used in the lowermost layer was changed from ethanol to methylene chloride.




EXAMPLE 3




The conditions were identical to those described in Example 1, except that the substrate is changed to untreated cellulose acetate (CA). A coating of polyvinylbutyral was coated on to the cellulose acetate substrate, dried and tested for adhesive strength as described in Example 1 above. The results are summarized in Table 1. As shown in Table 1, adhesive strength was greater on cellulose acetate supports when films were prepared using methylene chloride or methylethyl ketone as the carrier layer. In some cases, adhesive strength was improved by more than ten fold. For example, the adhesive strength increases from 9 to 160 N/m on a cellulose acetate support when the organic solvent used in the lowermost layer was changed form ethanol to methylene chloride.
















TABLE 1












Polymer




Adhesive






Carrier Solvent




Support




Sub Layer




Compatibility




Strength











Ethanol




PET




None




No




2 N/m






Methylethyl ketone




PET




None




No




 3






Methylene chloride




PET




None




No




 5






Ethanol




PET




CAB




Partially




10






Methylethyl ketone




PET




CAB




Partially




68






Methylene chloride




PET




CAB




Partially




160 






Ethanol




PET




Nitro-




Yes




unable to








cellulose





peel*






Methylethyl ketone




PET




Nitro-




Yes




unable to








cellulose





peel






Methylene chloride




PET




Nitro-




Yes




unable to








cellulose





peel






Ethanol




CA




None




Partially




 9






1:1 Methanol:ethanol




CA




None




Partially




13






Methylethyl ketone




CA




None




Partially




29






Methylene chloride




CA




None




Partially




160 











*Samples prepared with nitrocellulose had very good adhesion and a quantitative measure of adhesive strength was not attained because peeling could not be initiated.













For the data presented in Table 1, multilayer coatings of polyvinylbutyral were applied to various supports using organic solvents as the carrier layer with the slide bead die illustrated in FIG.


1


. Final film samples were tested for adhesion by measuring the force required to peel the polyvinylbutyral layers from the support. Results are given in Newtons per meter (N/m). Results are for conditions described in Example 1.




The following test was used to determine the level of adhesion data presented in Table 1. The adhesion strength of the coated samples was measured using a modified 180° peel test with an Instron 1122 Tensile Tester with a 500 gram load cell. First, 0.0254 m (one inch) wide strips of the coated sample were prepared. Delamination of the coating at one end was initiated using a piece of 3M 810 Magic Tape. An additional piece of tape was then attached to the delaminated part of the coating and served as the gripping point for testing. The extending tape was long enough to extend beyond the support such that the Instron grips did not interfere with the testing. The sample was then mounted into the Instron 1122 Tensile Tester with the substrate clamped in the upper grip and the coating/tape assembly clamped in the bottom grip. The average force (in units of Newtons) required to peel the coating off the substrate at a 180° angle at a speed of 2 inches/min (50.8 mm/min) was recorded. Using this force value the adhesive strength in units of N/m was calculated using the equation:








S




A




=F




p


(1−cos θ)/


w








wherein S


A


is the adhesive strength, F


p


is the peel force, θ is the angle of peel (180°), and w is the width of the sample (0.0254 m).




From the foregoing, it will be seen that this invention is one well adapted to obtain all of the ends and objects hereinabove set forth together with other advantages which are apparent and which are inherent to the apparatus.




It will be understood that certain features and subcombinations are of utility and may be employed with reference to other features and subcombinations. This is contemplated by and is within the scope of the claims.




As many possible embodiments may be made of the invention without departing from the scope thereof, it is to be understood that all matter herein set forth and shown in the accompanying drawings is to be interpreted as illustrative and not in a limiting sense.















PARTS LIST:
























10




multi-slot slide bead coating apparatus/hopper






12




front section






14




second section






16




third section






18




fourth section






20




back plate






22




inlet






24




first metering slot






26




pump






28




carrier layer






30




inlet






32




second metering slot






34




pump






36




layer






38




inlet






40




third metering slot






42




pump






44




layer






46




inlet






48




fourth metering slot






50




pump






52




layer






54




first inclined slide surface






56




coating lip






58




second inclined slide surface






60




third inclined slide surface






62




fourth inclined slide surface






64




back land surface






66




coating backing roller






70




moving web






72




coating bead













Claims
  • 1. A method for controlling a level of adhesion between a support web and a coating applied thereto in a slide bead coating operation comprising the steps of:(a) selecting the support web; (b) selecting an organic solvent or blend of organic solvents that is substantially free of other constituents as a carrier layer; (c) flowing a multilayer composite down a slide surface and over a coating lip of a coating hopper, the multilayer composite including the carrier layer; (d) forming a coating bead between the coating lip and the web to thereby apply the multilayer composite to the support web; (e) drying the multilayer composite on the support web, the carrier layer evaporating from the multilayer composite; (f) testing an adhesive strength between the support web or subbing layer and the multilayer composite after drying; and (g) if a desired level of adhesion is not found in the testing step, selecting a different organic solvent or blend of organic solvents to modify the adhesive strength between the support web or subbing layer and the multilayer composite and repeating steps (c) through (g) until the desired level of adhesion is found.
  • 2. A method as recited in claim 1 further comprising the step of:determining whether to apply a subbing layer to the support web.
  • 3. A method as recited in claim 2 further comprising the step of:applying the subbing layer to the support web prior to the flowing step if so determined in the determining step.
  • 4. A method as recited in claim 1 further comprising the step of:applying a subbing layer to the support web prior to the flowing step.
  • 5. A method for controlling a level of adhesion between a support web and a coating applied thereto in a slide bead, curtain, or extrusion hopper coating operation comprising the steps of(a) selecting the support web with or without a subbing layer applied thereto; (b) selecting an organic solvent or a blend of organic solvents that is substantially free of other constituents as a carrier layer; (c) forming a multilayer composite including the carrier layer, the carrier layer being the lowermost layer thereof; (d) applying the multilayer composite to the support web or the subbing layer; (e) drying the multilayer composite on the support web, the carrier layer evaporating from the multilayer composite; (f) testing the adhesive strength between the support web or subbing layer and the multilayer composite after drying; and (g) if a desired level of adhesion is not found in the testing step, selecting a different organic solvent or blend of organic solvents and repeating steps (c) through (g) until the desired level of adhesion is found.
  • 6. A method as recited in claim 5 further comprising the step of:forming a coating bead with the multilayer composite to perform the applying step.
  • 7. A method as recited in claim 5 wherein:the carrier layer is comprised of a blend of organic solvents containing at least two of the following components: methanol, ethanol, isopropanol, n-butanol, acetone, methylethyl ketone, methylisobutyl ketone, toluene and methylene chloride.
  • 8. A method as recited in claim 7 wherein:the layers of the multilayer composite above the carrier layer contain at least one of the following polymeric materials: cellulosics, polyvinylbutyrals, polycarbonates, polyurethanes, and polyesters.
  • 9. A method as recited in claim 8 wherein:the layers of the multilayer composite above the carrier layer have a combined wet thickness in a range of 1-500 μm.
  • 10. A method as recited in claim 9 wherein:at least one layers of the multilayer composite above the carrier layer has a viscosity in the range of 10-5,000 cp.
  • 11. A method as recited in claim 5 wherein:the layers of the multilayer composite above the carrier layer contain at least one of the following polymeric materials: cellulosics, polyvinylbutyrals, polycarbonates, polyurethanes, and polyesters.
  • 12. A method as recited in claim 5 wherein:the layers of the multilayer composite above the carrier layer have a combined wet thickness in a range of 1-500 μm.
  • 13. A method as recited in claim 5 wherein:at least one layer of the multilayer composite above the carrier layer has a viscosity in the range of 10-5,000 cp.
  • 14. A method as recited in claim 5 wherein:at least one layer of the multilayer composite above the carrier layer includes water.
  • 15. A method as recited in claim 5 wherein:the moving web is untreated polyethylene terephthalate.
  • 16. A method as recited in claim 5 wherein:the moving web has a subbing layer.
  • 17. A method as recited in claim 5 wherein:the carrier layer has a surface tension of less than 40 dynes/cm.
  • 18. A method as recited in claim 5 wherein:the carrier layer has a wet thickness in the range of from about 1 to about 20 μm.
  • 19. A method as recited in claim 5 wherein:the carrier layer has a wet thickness of less than about 5 μm.
  • 20. A method as recited in claim 5 wherein:the moving web is untreated cellulose acetate.
  • 21. A method as recited in claim 5 wherein:the organic solvent is selected from the following group: methanol (0.6 cp.), acetone (0.3 cp.), methylethyl ketone (0.4 cp.), methyl isobutyl ketone (0.6 cp.), methylene chloride (0.4 cp.), toluene (0.6 cp.), methyl acetate (0.4 cp.), ethyl acetate (0.5 cp.), isopropyl acetate (0.5 cp.), n-propyl acetate (0.6 cp.), ethanol (1.2 cp.), n-propanol (2.3 cp.) and n-butanol (3.0 cp.).
  • 22. A method as recited in claim 21 wherein:the layers of the multilayer composite above the carrier layer contain at least one of the following polymeric materials: cellulosics, polyvinylbutyrals, polycarbonates, polyurethanes, and polyesters.
  • 23. A method as recited in claim 22 wherein:the layers of the multilayer composite above the carrier layer have a combined wet thickness in a range of 1-500 μm.
  • 24. A method as recited in claim 23 wherein:at least one layers of the multilayer composite above the carrier layer has a viscosity in the range of 10-5,000 cp.
US Referenced Citations (13)
Number Name Date Kind
2761791 Russell Sep 1956 A
3376208 Wood Apr 1968 A
3411908 Crawford et al. Nov 1968 A
3531314 Kerr et al. Sep 1970 A
3755683 Kiikka et al. Aug 1973 A
4128426 Ohta et al. Dec 1978 A
4594262 Kreil et al. Jun 1986 A
4689359 Ponticello et al. Aug 1987 A
4748150 Vanier et al. May 1988 A
5232825 Hattori et al. Aug 1993 A
5425980 Grace et al. Jun 1995 A
5458925 Hirshburg et al. Oct 1995 A
5849363 Yapel et al. Dec 1998 A