The present disclosure relates to a coating plant and a gantry structure for a series coating of workpieces such as, for exam, vehicle bodies, and also to a corresponding method.
Unlike stationary painting robots which are typically used in practice for relatively small workpieces, painting robots in coating plants for larger workpieces such as vehicle bodies are conventionally capable of linear motion on guide rails mounted on the side walls of the spray booth parallel to the conveying path of the bodies (travelling axis or “axis 7”). In most plants nowadays, during painting the bodies are conveyed through the booth in synchronism with the linear motion of the robots, but the bodies can also remain stationary during this process.
While, especially in most of the earlier plants, the guide rails were located in proximity to the booth floor or alongside the bodies (U.S. Pat. No. 4,342,536, U.S. Pat. No. 4,721,630, EP 0 084 523, EP 0 192 338, EP 0 216 482, EP 1 277 521, etc.), for various reasons it can be more effective to arrange the robot guide rails above the conveyor and, in particular, above the bodies, especially because the elevatedly arranged robots have correspondingly improved freedom of movement and robots arranged on the booth floor require substantially wider booths owing to the requisite painting distance from the body and, in the case of electrostatic painting, owing to the distance required for high-voltage insulation. The painting of vertical areas such as, in particular, the nose and tail regions of the bodies, is also made easier. Other reasons are the fact that the elevatedly arranged guide rails there do not restrict the view through the side wall of the booth and accessibility to the bodies as much and/or are less soiled by overspray, which is carried away downwards by the customary air flow in the booths. A possible further advantage of elevatedly mounted robots is that they do not disrupt the air flow from the booth roof downwards along the sides of the bodies into the booth floor as much as robots that are located on the floor alongside the body and that restrict the airway directly at the body, a fact which can lead to an undesirable increase in the flow rate.
In the case of each of the painting plants for vehicle bodies known from WO 2004/037430 and EP 1 609 532, a plurality of painting robots are located on two parallel guide rails which are in turn mounted on a frame enclosure arranged in the interior of the booth and having four upright legs interconnected by cross support members in a similar manner to the known gantry robot structures (European standard EN ISO 8373, 1996 D, page 7 “Gantry robots”; DE 4111889; etc.). One advantage of these gantry enclosures is that they can be easily erected in already existing painting booths without the need for considerable new construction or reconstruction of the booth.
WO 01/68267 also discloses a painting zone in a painting booth for vehicle bodies having an air supply through the upper roof wall and having two accessible control regions that are arranged vertically one above the other on each of the side walls, with robot guide rails arranged elevatedly above the conveyor being incorporated into modular prefabricated side-wall elements of the booth. Unlike the enclosure according to WO 2004/037430 or EP 1 609 532, the supporting structures of the guide rails are separate from each other in the booth interior, thus eliminating cross support members thereof in the booth interior. On the floor of this known painting booth, which is formed as usual by a grid structure for carrying away the vertical air flow, additional guide rails for further robots are mounted alongside the lower control region below the elevatedly arranged guide rails, the robots of the lower level being painting robots and the upper robots being door or bonnet openers. Further coating zones with guide rails arranged above the bodies for painting robots and/or handling robots are described in the patent application EP 06010550.9.
Painting booths for vehicle bodies having robot guide rails mounted vertically one above the other on the booth walls and having a plurality of painting zones arranged one downstream of the other along the transport path of the conveyor are known from EP 0745429.
The various approaches outlined above each require a relatively high degree of effort to construct the coating plants, a large capital outlay and control complexity, and high operating costs. Accordingly, the present disclosure is directed to providing a coating plant for vehicle bodies and a corresponding method, each of which require less construction effort, capital outlay and control complexity, and lower operating costs than the above approaches.
Various exemplary illustrations are explained in detail with reference to the examples shown simplified to some extent but substantially true to scale in the drawings. The exemplary illustrations set forth herein are not intended to be exhaustive or otherwise limit or restrict the claims to the precise fowls and configurations shown in the drawings and disclosed in the following detailed description, in which:
The present disclosure generally provides extremely narrow spray booths that can be achieved or used by dispensing with the mobility of the robots arranged on a gantry structure (that is to say the “gantry robots”). For the painting of car bodies the booth width can be reduced to, for example, approximately 4 to 4.5 m.
The robots can typically be coating robots, in particular painting robots, to which reference is made hereafter. They can, however, also be robots for other purposes, in particular handling robots such as, notably, door manipulators and/or bonnet manipulators, which can also optionally be positioned alongside a coating robot. Accordingly, the tool can, in particular, be an atomiser for the coating material or an opener tool for the doors or bonnets of vehicle bodies.
In the case in point, namely painting robots, the booth width required across the conveying path of the bodies is, first, reduced in that stationary painting robots are mounted by their base body not on the booth floor but on the gantry structure, that is to say substantially higher and advantageously above the body roofs, such that the above-mentioned problems with regard to the atomisers being an adequate painting distance from the body surfaces and high-voltage insulation are reduced. The elevatedly arranged painting robots have a much better workspace than floor-mounted robots arranged in a known manner alongside or below the bodies. An even narrower booth is, however, also made possible by the fact of dispensing with the relatively wide guide rails of the known gantry painting robots and the wide energy chains with movable control and supply cables that are required for mobility.
Narrow spray booths again have considerable advantages not only in terms of construction effort and capital outlay, which are dependent on the size of and space required by the booth, but in particular also in terms of operating costs, which are substantially governed by the air flow required in the booth. The booth air must not only have the correct flow rate but also satisfy strict quality conditions in terms of purity, temperature and humidity, and the expenditure required therefor is dependent on the volume of air required. This expenditure is reduced by the various examples provided herein, since the volumetric flow rate of air per unit of time is less in a narrower booth than in a wider booth.
Dispensing with robot mobility, as described in the examples herein, also eliminates the construction effort associated therewith, as well as the control complexity that known painting plants require for the linear motion of the robots.
Second, the exemplary illustrations also have the fundamental advantage that gantry structures with robots can be simply installed or incorporated in spray booths already in existence or that have been erected with minimal construction effort and, in particular, without solid stable walls.
In one exemplary illustration, the supports and longitudinal beams of the gantry structure are advantageously arranged on the outer face of the painting booth, such that only the base body proper of each of the robots is located inside the booth and, at the appropriate point around the base body, the inner face of the booth is free from other components (known as a “clean wall design”). This arrangement has the added advantage that the cables and hoses running to the robot can be located wholly outside the painting booth. As a rule it is easier to install the supports, longitudinal beams, cabling and hosing, and also the control panel outside the painting booth, and this is particularly advantageous if the gantry structure as described in the various exemplary illustrations is to be installed for an already existing booth and is to replace the hitherto existing machinery thereof as appropriate.
The advantages of the exemplary illustrations explained herein are all the more important since a typical coating plant for vehicle bodies as described herein may include not only one but a plurality of painting zones, each with their own spray booths which are separate from each other and in which the bodies are each painted by robots.
In the spray booth 1 shown in
The bodies 2 are coated by, for example, four or more painting robots which are arranged on the two side walls 5 and 5′ of the booth 1 and of which the painting robots 6 and 7 are visible in
The side walls 5 and 5′ of the booth 1 can be made from relatively thin material with glass windows or the like and are themselves not intended for or capable of carrying and supporting the elevatedly positioned painting robots 6 and 7. Rather, for mounting the painting robots there is a gantry structure provided specifically therefor and substantially consisting of a horizontal rectangular frame standing on legs in proximity to the four corners. The two vertical supports 11 visible in
As shown, for example in
Above the supports 11 and longitudinal beam 12 the outer face of the booth can be provided with further usable surfaces which can also be accessible for observing the painting operation. The reachable-space curves (workspace or “kidney-shaped” workspace) of the painting robots 6 and 7 are also shown in
The exemplary illustrations herein are not limited to the gantry structure between the two side walls 5 and 5′ as shown in
The painting robots 6 and 7 and 6′ and 7′, respectively, of the spray booths 1 and 1′ are distributed at useful positions between the two cross support members 13 and 13′, respectively, lengthwise of the conveying direction 20, with each of these four robots of one booth coating a different surface region of the bodies from the other three robots. The arrangement of the two painting robots 6 and 6′ on the one side and of the other two painting robots 7 and 7′ on the other side of the spray booth is thus selected according to the painting scheme of the plant such that, in the booth, the entire outer surface of the bodies can advantageously be painted in the simplest manner and with as little mutual hindrance of the robots as possible and especially in the shortest time. For these reasons it can also be useful for the painting robots, such as e.g. 7, on the longitudinal beam 12 of the one side wall of the spray booth to be spaced apart from each other and/or to be spaced apart from the cross support members 13 by distances different from the painting robots 6 on the longitudinal beam 12 of the other side wall. In particular, two painting robots arranged facing each other on opposite sides of the booth can, as shown, be mutually offset lengthwise of the conveying direction 20, that is to say be spaced different distances apart from the cross support members 13. As can be seen in
When the bodies are transported through the spray booths 1 and 1′ in the conveying direction 20 by the conveyor 4 (
One of the advantages of applying the two layers in two spray booths 1 and 1′ separate from each other is that, in the event of a malfunction in one of the two painting zones, the automatic painting operation can be continued in the other zone and the then missing other layer of paint can be applied in another manner.
In other cases the purpose of arranging a second spray booth 1′ after the first booth 1, which is separated therefrom by the respective end walls, can be to isolate two coating zones from each other having a different air balance, for example a zone for electrostatic application with rotary atomisers from a zone with air atomisers, in which different rates of air fall are necessary. In such plants or also in other plants, instead of the example described above it can also be useful for the robots in the one booth to paint other surface regions of the bodies from the robots of the other booth and/or to be arranged at other positions lengthwise of the conveying path.
Two (or more) painting lines operated in parallel can also be provided—in the example considered, topcoat lines. In this case there can be present, for example, spatially parallel alongside the spray booths 1 and 1′ shown in
Reference in the specification to “one example,” “an example,” “one embodiment,” or “an embodiment” means that a particular feature, structure, or characteristic described in connection with the example is included in at least one example. The phrase “in one example” in various places in the specification does not necessarily refer to the same example each time it appears.
With regard to the processes, systems, methods, heuristics, etc. described herein, it should be understood that, although the steps of such processes, etc. have been described as occurring according to a certain ordered sequence, such processes could be practiced with the described steps performed in an order other than the order described herein. It further should be understood that certain steps could be performed simultaneously, that other steps could be added, or that certain steps described herein could be omitted. In other words, the descriptions of processes herein are provided for the purpose of illustrating certain embodiments, and should in no way be construed so as to limit the claimed invention.
Accordingly, it is to be understood that the above description is intended to be illustrative and not restrictive. Many embodiments and applications other than the examples provided would be upon reading the above description. The scope of the invention should be determined, not with reference to the above description, but should instead be determined with reference to the appended claims, along with the full scope of equivalents to which such claims are entitled. It is anticipated and intended that future developments will occur in the arts discussed herein, and that the disclosed systems and methods will be incorporated into such future embodiments. In sum, it should be understood that the invention is capable of modification and variation and is limited only by the following claims.
All terms used in the claims are intended to be given their broadest reasonable constructions and their ordinary meanings as understood by those skilled in the art unless an explicit indication to the contrary in made herein. In particular, use of the singular articles such as “a,” “the,” “the,” etc. should be read to recite one or more of the indicated elements unless a claim recites an explicit limitation to the contrary.
Number | Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
10 2006 058 350.7 | Dec 2006 | DE | national |
This application is a National Phase application claiming the benefit of International Application No. PCT/EP2007/010560, filed Dec. 5, 2007, which claims priority to German Patent Application No. DE 10 2006 058 350.7, filed Dec. 11, 2006, the complete disclosures of which are hereby incorporated in by reference in their entireties.
Filing Document | Filing Date | Country | Kind | 371c Date |
---|---|---|---|---|
PCT/EP07/10560 | 12/5/2007 | WO | 00 | 6/27/2011 |