Coaxial cable is used to transmit radio frequency (RF) signals in various applications, such as connecting radio transmitters and receivers with their antennas, computer network connections, and distributing cable television signals. Coaxial cable typically includes an inner conductor, an insulating layer surrounding the inner conductor, an outer conductor surrounding the insulating layer, and a protective jacket surrounding the outer conductor.
Each type of coaxial cable has a characteristic impedance which is the opposition to signal flow in the coaxial cable. The impedance of a coaxial cable depends on its dimensions and the materials used in its manufacture. For example, a coaxial cable can be tuned to a specific impedance by controlling the diameters of the inner and outer conductors and the dielectric constant of the insulating layer. All of the components of a coaxial system should have the same impedance in order to reduce internal reflections at connections between components. Such reflections increase signal loss and can result in the reflected signal reaching a receiver with a slight delay from the original.
Two sections of a coaxial cable in which it can be difficult to maintain a consistent impedance are the terminal sections on either end of the cable to which connectors are attached. For example, the attachment of some field-installable compression connectors requires the removal of a section of the insulating layer at the terminal end of the coaxial cable in order to insert a support structure of the compression connector between the inner conductor and the outer conductor. The support structure of the compression connector prevents the collapse of the outer conductor when the compression connector applies pressure to the outside of the outer conductor. Unfortunately, however, the dielectric constant of the support structure often differs from the dielectric constant of the insulating layer that the support structure replaces, which changes the impedance of the terminal ends of the coaxial cable. This change in the impedance at the terminal ends of the coaxial cable causes increased internal reflections, which results in increased signal loss.
Another difficulty with field-installable connectors, such as compression connectors or screw-together connectors, is maintaining acceptable levels of passive intermodulation (PIM). PIM in the terminal sections of a coaxial cable can result from nonlinear and insecure contact between surfaces of various components of the connector. A nonlinear contact between two or more of these surfaces can cause micro arcing or corona discharge between the surfaces, which can result in the creation of interfering RF signals. For example, some screw-together connectors are designed such that the contact force between the connector and the outer conductor is dependent on a continuing axial holding force of threaded components of the connector. Over time, the threaded components of the connector can inadvertently separate, thus resulting in nonlinear and insecure contact between the connector and the outer conductor.
Where the coaxial cable is employed on a cellular communications tower, for example, unacceptably high levels of PIM in terminal sections of the coaxial cable and resulting interfering RF signals can disrupt communication between sensitive receiver and transmitter equipment on the tower and lower powered cellular devices. Disrupted communication can result in dropped calls or severely limited data rates, for example, which can result in dissatisfied customers and customer churn.
Current attempts to solve these difficulties with field-installable connectors generally consist of employing a pre-fabricated jumper cable having a standard length and having factory-installed soldered or welded connectors on either end. These soldered or welded connectors generally exhibit stable impedance matching and PIM performance over a wider range of dynamic conditions than current field-installable connectors. These pre-fabricated jumper cables are inconvenient, however, in many applications.
For example, each particular cellular communication tower in a cellular network generally requires various custom lengths of coaxial cable, necessitating the selection of various standard-length jumper cables that is each generally longer than needed, resulting in wasted cable. Also, employing a longer length of cable than is needed results in increased insertion loss in the cable. Further, excessive cable length takes up more space on the tower. Moreover, it can be inconvenient for an installation technician to have several lengths of jumper cable on hand instead of a single roll of cable that can be cut to the needed length. Also, factory testing of factory-installed soldered or welded connectors for compliance with impedance matching and PIM standards often reveals a relatively high percentage of noncompliant connectors. This percentage of non-compliant, and therefore unusable, connectors can be as high as about ten percent of the connectors in some manufacturing situations. For all these reasons, employing factory-installed soldered or welded connectors on standard-length jumper cables to solve the above-noted difficulties with field-installable connectors is not an ideal solution.
In general, example embodiments of the present invention relate to coaxial cable connectors. The example coaxial cable connectors disclosed herein improve impedance matching in coaxial cable terminations, thus reducing internal reflections and resulting signal loss associated with inconsistent impedance. Further, the example coaxial cable connectors disclosed herein also improve mechanical and electrical contacts in coaxial cable terminations, which reduces passive intermodulation (PIM) levels and associated creation of interfering RF signals that emanate from the coaxial cable terminations.
In one example embodiment, a coaxial cable connector for terminating a coaxial cable is provided. The coaxial cable includes an inner conductor, an insulating layer surrounding the inner conductor, an outer conductor surrounding the insulating layer, and a jacket surrounding the outer conductor. The coaxial cable connector includes an internal connector structure, an external connector structure, and a conductive pin. The external connector structure cooperates with the internal connector structure to define a cylindrical gap that is configured to receive an increased-diameter cylindrical section of the outer conductor. As the coaxial cable connector is moved from an open position to an engaged position, the external connector structure is configured to be clamped around the increased-diameter cylindrical section so as to radially compress the increased-diameter cylindrical section between the external connector structure and the internal connector structure. Further, as the coaxial cable connector is moved from an open position to an engaged position, a contact force between the conductive pin and the inner conductor is configured to increase.
In another example embodiment, a connector for terminating a corrugated coaxial cable is provided. The corrugated coaxial cable includes an inner conductor, an insulating layer surrounding the inner conductor, a corrugated outer conductor having peaks and valleys and surrounding the insulating layer, and a jacket surrounding the corrugated outer conductor. The connector includes a mandrel, a clamp, and a conductive pin. The mandrel has a cylindrical outside surface with a diameter that is greater than an inside diameter of valleys of the corrugated outer conductor. The clamp has a cylindrical inside surface that surrounds the cylindrical outside surface of the mandrel and cooperates with the mandrel to define a cylindrical gap. The cylindrical gap is configured to receive an increased-diameter cylindrical section of the corrugated outer conductor. As the coaxial cable connector is moved from an open position to an engaged position, the cylindrical inside surface is configured to be clamped around the increased-diameter cylindrical section so as to radially compress the increased-diameter cylindrical section between the clamp and the mandrel. Further, as the coaxial cable connector is moved from an open position to an engaged position, a contact force between the conductive pin and the inner conductor is configured to increase.
In yet another example embodiment, a connector for terminating a smooth-walled coaxial cable is provided. The smooth-walled coaxial cable includes an inner conductor, an insulating layer surrounding the inner conductor, a smooth-walled outer conductor surrounding the insulating layer, and a jacket surrounding the smooth-walled outer conductor. The connector includes a mandrel, a clamp, and a conductive pin. The mandrel has a cylindrical outside surface with a diameter that is greater than an inside diameter of the smooth-walled outer conductor. The clamp has a cylindrical inside surface that surrounds the cylindrical outside surface of the mandrel and cooperates with the mandrel to define a cylindrical gap. The cylindrical gap is configured to receive an increased-diameter cylindrical section of the smooth-walled outer conductor. As the coaxial cable connector is moved from an open position to an engaged position, the cylindrical inside surface is configured to be clamped around the increased-diameter cylindrical section so as to radially compress the increased-diameter cylindrical section between the clamp and the mandrel. Further, as the coaxial cable connector is moved from an open position to an engaged position, a contact force between the conductive pin and the inner conductor is configured to increase.
This Summary is provided to introduce a selection of concepts in a simplified form that are further described below in the Detailed Description. This Summary is not intended to identify key features or essential characteristics of the claimed subject matter, nor is it intended to be used as an aid in determining the scope of the claimed subject matter. Moreover, it is to be understood that both the foregoing general description and the following detailed description of the present invention are exemplary and explanatory and are intended to provide further explanation of the invention as claimed.
Aspects of example embodiments of the present invention will become apparent from the following detailed description of example embodiments given in conjunction with the accompanying drawings, in which:
Example embodiments of the present invention relate to coaxial cable connectors. In the following detailed description of some example embodiments, reference will now be made in detail to example embodiments of the present invention which are illustrated in the accompanying drawings. Wherever possible, the same reference numbers will be used throughout the drawings to refer to the same or like parts. These embodiments are described in sufficient detail to enable those skilled in the art to practice the invention. Other embodiments may be utilized and structural, logical and electrical changes may be made without departing from the scope of the present invention. Moreover, it is to be understood that the various embodiments of the invention, although different, are not necessarily mutually exclusive. For example, a particular feature, structure, or characteristic described in one embodiment may be included within other embodiments. The following detailed description is, therefore, not to be taken in a limiting sense, and the scope of the present invention is defined only by the appended claims, along with the full scope of equivalents to which such claims are entitled.
I. Example Coaxial Cable and Example Compression Connector
With reference now to
Also disclosed in
With reference now to
The inner conductor 102 is positioned at the core of the example coaxial cable 100 and may be configured to carry a range of electrical current (amperes) and/or RF/electronic digital signals. The inner conductor 102 can be formed from copper, copper-clad aluminum (CCA), copper-clad steel (CCS), or silver-coated copper-clad steel (SCCCS), although other conductive materials are also possible. For example, the inner conductor 102 can be formed from any type of conductive metal or alloy. In addition, although the inner conductor 102 of
The insulating layer 104 surrounds the inner conductor 102, and generally serves to support the inner conductor 102 and insulate the inner conductor 102 from the outer conductor 106. Although not shown in the figures, a bonding agent, such as a polymer, may be employed to bond the insulating layer 104 to the inner conductor 102. As disclosed in
The corrugated outer conductor 106 surrounds the insulating layer 104, and generally serves to minimize the ingress and egress of high frequency electromagnetic radiation to/from the inner conductor 102. In some applications, high frequency electromagnetic radiation is radiation with a frequency that is greater than or equal to about 50 MHz. The corrugated outer conductor 106 can be formed from solid copper, solid aluminum, copper-clad aluminum (CCA), although other conductive materials are also possible. The corrugated configuration of the corrugated outer conductor 106, with peaks and valleys, enables the coaxial cable 100 to be flexed more easily than cables with smooth-walled outer conductors.
The jacket 108 surrounds the corrugated outer conductor 106, and generally serves to protect the internal components of the coaxial cable 100 from external contaminants, such as dust, moisture, and oils, for example. In a typical embodiment, the jacket 108 also functions to limit the bending radius of the cable to prevent kinking, and functions to protect the cable (and its internal components) from being crushed or otherwise misshapen from an external force. The jacket 108 can be formed from a variety of materials including, but not limited to, polyethylene (PE), high-density polyethylene (HDPE), low-density polyethylene (LDPE), linear low-density polyethylene (LLDPE), rubberized polyvinyl chloride (PVC), or some combination thereof. The actual material used in the formation of the jacket 108 might be indicated by the particular application/environment contemplated.
It is understood that the insulating layer 104 can be formed from other types of insulating materials or structures having a dielectric constant that is sufficient to insulate the inner conductor 102 from the outer conductor 106. For example, as disclosed in
With reference to
The term “cylindrical” as used herein refers to a component having a section or surface with a substantially uniform diameter throughout the length of the section or surface. It is understood, therefore, that a “cylindrical” section or surface may have minor imperfections or irregularities in the roundness or consistency throughout the length of the section or surface. It is further understood that a “cylindrical” section or surface may have an intentional distribution or pattern of features, such as grooves or teeth, but nevertheless on average has a substantially uniform diameter throughout the length of the section or surface.
This increasing of the diameter of the corrugated outer conductor 106 can be accomplished using any of the tools disclosed in co-pending U.S. patent application Ser. No. 12/753,729, titled “COAXIAL CABLE PREPARATION TOOLS,” filed Apr. 2, 2010 and incorporated herein by reference in its entirety. Alternatively, this increasing of the diameter of the corrugated outer conductor 106 can be accomplished using other tools, such as a common pipe expander.
As disclosed in
As disclosed in
As disclosed in
The preparation of the terminal section of the example corrugated coaxial cable 100 disclosed in
Although the insulating layer 104 is shown in
In addition, it is understood that the corrugated outer conductor 106 can be either annular corrugated outer conductor, as disclosed in the figures, or can be helical corrugated outer conductor (not shown). Further, the example compression connectors disclosed herein can similarly benefit a coaxial cable with a helical corrugated outer conductor (not shown).
II. Example Compression Connector
With reference now to
As disclosed in
The mandrel 290 is an example of an internal connector structure as at least a portion of the mandrel 290 is configured to be positioned internal to a coaxial cable. The clamp 300 is an example of an external connector structure as at least a portion of the clamp 300 is configured to be positioned external to a coaxial cable. The mandrel 290 has a cylindrical outside surface 292 that is surrounded by a cylindrical inside surface 302 of the clamp 300. The cylindrical outside surface 292 cooperates with the cylindrical inside surface 302 to define a cylindrical gap 340.
The mandrel 290 further has an inwardly-tapering outside surface 294 adjacent to one end of the cylindrical outside surface 292, as well as an annular flange 296 adjacent to the other end of the cylindrical outside surface 292. As disclosed in
Although the majority of the outside surface of the mandrel 290 and the inside surface of the clamp 300 are cylindrical, it is understood that portions of these surfaces may be non-cylindrical. For example, portions of these surfaces may include steps, grooves, or ribs in order achieve mechanical and electrical contact with the increased-diameter cylindrical section 116 of the example coaxial cable 100.
For example, the outside surface of the mandrel 290 may include a rib that corresponds to a cooperating groove included on the inside surface of the clamp 300. In this example, the compression of the increased-diameter cylindrical section 116 between the mandrel 290 and the clamp 300 will cause the rib of the mandrel 290 to deform the increased-diameter cylindrical section 116 into the cooperating groove of the clamp 300. This can result in improved mechanical and/or electrical contact between the clamp 300, the increased-diameter cylindrical section 116, and the mandrel 290. In this example, the locations of the rib and the cooperating groove can also be reversed. Further, it is understood that at least portions of the surfaces of the rib and the cooperating groove can be cylindrical surfaces. Also, multiple rib/cooperating groove pairs may be included on the mandrel 290 and/or the clamp 300. Therefore, the outside surface of the mandrel 290 and the inside surface of the clamp 300 are not limited to the configurations disclosed in the figures.
III. Cable Termination Using the Example Compression Connector
With reference now to
As disclosed in
Further, as the compression connector 200 is moved into the engaged position, a shoulder 336 of the compression sleeve 330 axially biases against the jacket seal 320, which axially biases against the clamp ring 310, which axially forces the inwardly-tapering outside transition surface 308 of the clamp 300 against an outwardly-tapering inside surface 238 of the connector body 230. As the surfaces 308 and 238 slide past one another, the clamp 300 is radially forced into the smaller diameter connector body 230, which radially compresses the clamp 300 and thus reduces the outer diameter of the clamp 300 by narrowing or closing the slot 304 (see
In addition, as the compression connector 200 is moved into the engaged position, the clamp 300 axially biases against the annular flange 296 of the mandrel 290, which axially biases against the conductive pin 270, which axially forces the conductive pin 270 into the insulator 260 until a shoulder 276 of the collet portion 274 abuts a shoulder 262 of the insulator 260. As the collet portion 274 is axially forced into the insulator 260, the fingers 278 of the collet portion 274 are radially contracted around the inner conductor 102 by narrowing or closing the slots 279 (see
With reference now to
With continued reference to
With reference to
Also disclosed in
It is understood that one of the mandrel 290 or the clamp 300 can alternatively be formed from a non-metal material such as polyetherimide (PEI) or polycarbonate, or from a metal/non-metal composite material such as a selectively metal-plated PEI or polycarbonate material. A selectively metal-plated mandrel 290 or clamp 300 may be metal-plated at contact surfaces where the mandrel 290 or the clamp 300 makes contact with another component of the compression connector 200. Further, bridge plating, such as one or more metal traces, can be included between these metal-plated contact surfaces in order to ensure electrical continuity between the contact surfaces. It is understood that only one of these two components needs to be formed from metal or from a metal/non-metal composite material in order to create a single electrically conductive path between the outer conductor 106 and the connector body 230.
The increased-diameter cylindrical section 116 of the outer conductor 106 enables the inserted portion of the mandrel 290 to be relatively thick and to be formed from a material with a relatively high dielectric constant and still maintain favorable impedance characteristics. Also disclosed in
Once inserted, the mandrel 290 replaces the material from which the insulating layer 104 is formed in the cored-out section 114. This replacement changes the dielectric constant of the material positioned between the inner conductor 102 and the outer conductor 106 in the cored-out section 114. Since the impedance of the coaxial cable 100 is a function of the diameters of the inner and outer conductors 102 and 106 and the dielectric constant of the insulating layer 104, in isolation this change in the dielectric constant would alter the impedance of the cored-out section 114 of the coaxial cable 100. Where the mandrel 290 is formed from a material that has a significantly different dielectric constant from the dielectric constant of the insulating layer 104, this change in the dielectric constant would, in isolation, significantly alter the impedance of the cored-out section 114 of the coaxial cable 100.
However, the increase of the diameter of the outer conductor 106 of the increased-diameter cylindrical section 116 is configured to compensate for the difference in the dielectric constant between the removed insulating layer 104 and the inserted portion of the mandrel 290 in the cored-out section 114. Accordingly, the increase of the diameter of the outer conductor 106 in the increased-diameter cylindrical section 116 enables the impedance of the cored-out section 114 to remain about equal to the impedance of the remainder of the coaxial cable 100, thus reducing internal reflections and resulting signal loss associated with inconsistent impedance.
In general, the impedance z of the coaxial cable 100 can be determined using Equation (1):
where ε is the dielectric constant of the material between the inner and outer conductors 102 and 106, φOUTER is the effective inside diameter of the corrugated outer conductor 106, and φINNER is the outside diameter of the inner conductor 102. However, once the insulating layer 104 is removed from the cored-out section 114 of the coaxial cable 100 and the metal mandrel 290 is inserted into the cored-out section 114, the metal mandrel 290 effectively becomes an extension of the metal outer conductor 106 in the cored-out section 114 of the coaxial cable 100.
In general, the impedance z of the example coaxial cable 100 should be maintained at 50 Ohms. Before termination, the impedance z of the coaxial cable is formed at 50 Ohms by forming the example coaxial cable 100 with the following characteristics:
ε=1.100;
φOUTER=0.458 inches;
φINNER=0.191 inches; and
z=50 Ohms.
During termination, however, the inside diameter of the cored-out section 114 of the outer conductor 106 φOUTER of 0.458 inches is effectively replaced by the inside diameter of the mandrel 290 of 0.440 inches in order to maintain the impedance z of the cored-out section 114 of the coaxial cable 100 at 50 Ohms, with the following characteristics:
ε=1.000;
φOUTER (the inside diameter of the mandrel 290)=0.440 inches;
φINNER=0.191 inches; and
z=50 Ohms.
Thus, the increase of the diameter of the outer conductor 106 enables the mandrel 290 to be formed from metal and effectively replace the inside diameter of the cored-out section 114 of the outer conductor 106 φOUTER. Further, the increase of the diameter of the outer conductor 106 also enables the mandrel 290 to alternatively be formed from a non-metal material having a dielectric constant that does not closely match the dielectric constant of the material from which the insulating layer 104 is formed.
As disclosed in
As disclosed in
This relative increase in the amount of force that can be directed inward on the increased-diameter cylindrical section 116 increases the security of the mechanical and electrical contacts between the mandrel 290, the increased-diameter cylindrical section 116, and the clamp 300. Further, the contracting configuration of the insulator 260 and the conductive pin 270 increases the security of the mechanical and electrical contacts between the conductive pin 270 and the inner conductor 102. Even in applications where these mechanical and electrical contacts between the compression connector 200 and the coaxial cable 100 are subject to stress due to high wind, precipitation, extreme temperature fluctuations, and vibration, the relative increase in the amount of force that can be directed inward on the increased diameter cylindrical section 116, combined with the contracting configuration of the insulator 260 and the conductive pin 270, tend to maintain these mechanical and electrical contacts with relatively small degradation over time. These mechanical and electrical contacts thus reduce, for example, micro arcing or corona discharge between surfaces, which reduces the PIM levels and associated creation of interfering RF signals that emanate from the example compression connector 200.
In contrast,
It is noted that although the PIM levels achieved using the prior art compression connector generally satisfy the minimum acceptable industry standard of −140 dBc (except at 1906 MHz for the signal F2) required in the 2G and 3G wireless industries for cellular communication towers. However, the PIM levels achieved using the prior art compression connector fall below the minimum acceptable industry standard of −155 dBc that is currently required in the 4G wireless industry for cellular communication towers. Compression connectors having PIM levels above this minimum acceptable standard of −155 dBc result in interfering RF signals that disrupt communication between sensitive receiver and transmitter equipment on the tower and lower-powered cellular devices in 4G systems. Advantageously, the relatively low PIM levels achieved using the example compression connector 200 surpass the minimum acceptable level of −155 dBc, thus reducing these interfering RF signals. Accordingly, the example field-installable compression connector 200 enables coaxial cable technicians to perform terminations of coaxial cable in the field that have sufficiently low levels of PIM to enable reliable 4G wireless communication. Advantageously, the example field installable compression connector 200 exhibits impedance matching and PIM characteristics that match or exceed the corresponding characteristics of less convenient factory-installed soldered or welded connectors on pre-fabricated jumper cables.
In addition, it is noted that a single design of the example compression connector 200 can be field-installed on various manufacturers' coaxial cables despite slight differences in the cable dimensions between manufacturers. For example, even though each manufacturer's ½″ series corrugated coaxial cable has a slightly different sinusoidal period length, valley diameter, and peak diameter in the corrugated outer conductor, the preparation of these disparate corrugated outer conductors to have a substantially identical increased-diameter cylindrical section 116, as disclosed herein, enables each of these disparate cables to be terminated using a single compression connector 200. Therefore, the design of the example compression connector 200 avoids the hassle of having to employ a different connector design for each different manufacturer's corrugated coaxial cable.
Further, the design of the various components of the example compression connector 200 is simplified over prior art compression connectors. This simplified design enables these components to be manufactured and assembled into the example compression connector 200 more quickly and less expensively.
IV. Another Example Coaxial Cable and Example Compression Connector
With reference now to
Also disclosed in
With reference now to
As disclosed in
With reference to
As disclosed in
As disclosed in
V. Cable Termination Using the Example Compression Connector
With reference now to
As disclosed in
In addition, as the compression connector 200′ is moved into the engaged position, the axial force of the shoulder 336 of the compression sleeve 330 combined with the opposite axial force of the clamp ring 310 axially compresses the jacket seal 320′ causing the jacket seal 320′ to become shorter in length and thicker in width. The thickened width of the jacket seal 320′ causes the jacket seal 320′ to press tightly against the jacket 408 of the smooth-walled coaxial cable 400, thus sealing the compression sleeve 330 to the jacket 408 of the smooth-walled coaxial cable 400. Once sealed, the narrowest inside diameter 322′ of the jacket seal 320′, which is equal to the outside diameter 124′ of the jacket 408, is less than the sum of the diameter 298 of the cylindrical outside surface 292 of the mandrel 290 plus two times the thickness of the jacket 408.
As noted above in connection with the example compression connector 200, the termination of the smooth-walled coaxial cable 400 using the example compression connector 200′ enables the impedance of the cored-out section 414 to remain about equal to the impedance of the remainder of the coaxial cable 400, thus reducing internal reflections and resulting signal loss associated with inconsistent impedance. Further, the termination of the smooth-walled coaxial cable 400 using the example compression connector 200′ enables improved mechanical and electrical contacts between the mandrel 290, the increased-diameter cylindrical section 416, and the clamp 290, as well as between the inner conductor 402 and the conductive pin 270, which reduces the PIM levels and associated creation of interfering RF signals that emanate from the example compression connector 200′.
VI. Another Example Compression Connector
With reference now to
As disclosed in
As disclosed in
With reference to
As disclosed in
As disclosed in
As noted above in connection with the example compression connectors 200 and 200′, the termination of the corrugated coaxial cable 700 using the example compression connector 500 enables the impedance of the cored-out section 714 of the cable 700 to remain about equal to the impedance of the remainder of the cable 700, thus reducing internal reflections and resulting signal loss associated with inconsistent impedance. Further, the termination of the corrugated coaxial cable 700 using the example compression connector 500 enables improved mechanical and electrical contacts between the mandrel 590, the increased-diameter cylindrical section 716, and the clamp 600, as well as between the inner conductor 702 and the conductive pin 540, which reduces the PIM levels and associated creation of interfering RF signals that emanate from the example compression connector 500.
The example embodiments disclosed herein may be embodied in other specific forms. The example embodiments disclosed herein are to be considered in all respects only as illustrative and not restrictive.
This application is a continuation of the earlier U.S. Utility patent application to Chawgo et al., entitled “COAXIAL CABLE COMPRESSION CONNECTORS,” Ser. No. 12/753,735, filed Apr. 2, 2010, the disclosure of which is hereby incorporated entirely herein by reference.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
2258737 | Browne | Oct 1941 | A |
2785384 | Wickesser | Mar 1957 | A |
3022482 | Waterfield et al. | Feb 1962 | A |
3076169 | Blaisdell | Jan 1963 | A |
3184706 | Atkins | May 1965 | A |
3221290 | Stark et al. | Nov 1965 | A |
3275913 | Blanchard et al. | Sep 1966 | A |
3297979 | O'Keefe et al. | Jan 1967 | A |
3321732 | Forney, Jr. | May 1967 | A |
3355698 | Keller | Nov 1967 | A |
3372364 | O'Keefe et al. | Mar 1968 | A |
3406373 | Forney, Jr. | Oct 1968 | A |
3498647 | Schroder | Mar 1970 | A |
3539976 | Reynolds | Nov 1970 | A |
3581269 | Frey | May 1971 | A |
3629792 | Dorrell | Dec 1971 | A |
3671922 | Zerlin et al. | Jun 1972 | A |
3671926 | Nepovim | Jun 1972 | A |
3678446 | Siebelist | Jul 1972 | A |
3686623 | Nijman | Aug 1972 | A |
3710005 | French | Jan 1973 | A |
3744011 | Blanchenot | Jul 1973 | A |
3757279 | Winston | Sep 1973 | A |
3764959 | Toma et al. | Oct 1973 | A |
3845453 | Hemmer | Oct 1974 | A |
3879102 | Horak | Apr 1975 | A |
3915539 | Collins | Oct 1975 | A |
3936132 | Hutter | Feb 1976 | A |
3963321 | Burger et al. | Jun 1976 | A |
3985418 | Spinner | Oct 1976 | A |
4035054 | Lattanzi | Jul 1977 | A |
4046451 | Juds et al. | Sep 1977 | A |
4047291 | Spinner | Sep 1977 | A |
4053200 | Pugner | Oct 1977 | A |
4059330 | Shirey | Nov 1977 | A |
4126372 | Hashimoto et al. | Nov 1978 | A |
4156554 | Aujla | May 1979 | A |
4168921 | Blanchard | Sep 1979 | A |
4173385 | Fenn et al. | Nov 1979 | A |
4227765 | Neumann et al. | Oct 1980 | A |
4280749 | Hemmer | Jul 1981 | A |
4305638 | Hutter | Dec 1981 | A |
4339166 | Dayton | Jul 1982 | A |
4346958 | Blanchard | Aug 1982 | A |
4354721 | Luzzi | Oct 1982 | A |
4373767 | Caims | Feb 1983 | A |
4400050 | Hayward | Aug 1983 | A |
4408821 | Forney, Jr. | Oct 1983 | A |
4408822 | Nikitas | Oct 1983 | A |
4421377 | Spinner | Dec 1983 | A |
4444453 | Kirby et al. | Apr 1984 | A |
4456324 | Staeger | Jun 1984 | A |
4484792 | Tengler et al. | Nov 1984 | A |
4491685 | Drew et al. | Jan 1985 | A |
4533191 | Blackwood | Aug 1985 | A |
4545637 | Bosshard et al. | Oct 1985 | A |
4557546 | Dreyer | Dec 1985 | A |
4575274 | Hayward | Mar 1986 | A |
4583811 | McMills | Apr 1986 | A |
4596435 | Bickford | Jun 1986 | A |
4600263 | DeChamp et al. | Jul 1986 | A |
4614390 | Baker | Sep 1986 | A |
4645281 | Burger | Feb 1987 | A |
4650228 | McMills et al. | Mar 1987 | A |
4655159 | McMills | Apr 1987 | A |
4660921 | Hauver | Apr 1987 | A |
4668043 | Saba et al. | May 1987 | A |
4674818 | McMills et al. | Jun 1987 | A |
4676577 | Szegda | Jun 1987 | A |
4684201 | Hutter | Aug 1987 | A |
4691976 | Cowen | Sep 1987 | A |
4738009 | Down et al. | Apr 1988 | A |
4746305 | Nomura | May 1988 | A |
4747786 | Hayashi et al. | May 1988 | A |
4755152 | Elliot et al. | Jul 1988 | A |
4789355 | Lee | Dec 1988 | A |
4804338 | Dibble et al. | Feb 1989 | A |
4806116 | Ackerman | Feb 1989 | A |
4813886 | Roos et al. | Mar 1989 | A |
4824400 | Spinner | Apr 1989 | A |
4824401 | Spinner | Apr 1989 | A |
4834675 | Samchisen | May 1989 | A |
4854893 | Morris | Aug 1989 | A |
4857014 | Alf et al. | Aug 1989 | A |
4869679 | Szegda | Sep 1989 | A |
4892275 | Szegda | Jan 1990 | A |
4902246 | Samchisen | Feb 1990 | A |
4906207 | Banning et al. | Mar 1990 | A |
4917631 | Souders et al. | Apr 1990 | A |
4923412 | Morris | May 1990 | A |
4925403 | Zorzy | May 1990 | A |
4929188 | Lionetto et al. | May 1990 | A |
4973265 | Heeren | Nov 1990 | A |
4990104 | Schieferly | Feb 1991 | A |
4990105 | Karlovich | Feb 1991 | A |
4990106 | Szegda | Feb 1991 | A |
5002503 | Campbell et al. | Mar 1991 | A |
5011432 | Sucht et al. | Apr 1991 | A |
5021010 | Wright | Jun 1991 | A |
5024606 | Ming-Hwa | Jun 1991 | A |
5037328 | Karlovich | Aug 1991 | A |
5062804 | Jamet et al. | Nov 1991 | A |
5066248 | Gaver, Jr. et al. | Nov 1991 | A |
5073129 | Szegda | Dec 1991 | A |
5083943 | Tarrant | Jan 1992 | A |
5127853 | McMills et al. | Jul 1992 | A |
5131862 | Gershfeld | Jul 1992 | A |
5137471 | Verespej et al. | Aug 1992 | A |
5141451 | Down | Aug 1992 | A |
5154636 | Vaccaro et al. | Oct 1992 | A |
5166477 | Perin, Jr. et al. | Nov 1992 | A |
5181161 | Hirose et al. | Jan 1993 | A |
5195906 | Szegda | Mar 1993 | A |
5205761 | Nilsson | Apr 1993 | A |
5207602 | McMills et al. | May 1993 | A |
5217391 | Fisher, Jr. | Jun 1993 | A |
5217393 | Del Negro et al. | Jun 1993 | A |
5269701 | Leibfried, Jr. | Dec 1993 | A |
5283853 | Szegda | Feb 1994 | A |
5284449 | Vaccaro | Feb 1994 | A |
5295864 | Birch et al. | Mar 1994 | A |
5316494 | Flanagan et al. | May 1994 | A |
5322454 | Thommen | Jun 1994 | A |
5338225 | Jacobsen et al. | Aug 1994 | A |
5340332 | Nakajima et al. | Aug 1994 | A |
5342218 | McMills et al. | Aug 1994 | A |
5352134 | Jacobsen et al. | Oct 1994 | A |
5354217 | Gabel et al. | Oct 1994 | A |
5371819 | Szegda | Dec 1994 | A |
5371821 | Szegda | Dec 1994 | A |
5371827 | Szegda | Dec 1994 | A |
5393244 | Szegda | Feb 1995 | A |
5431583 | Szegda | Jul 1995 | A |
5435745 | Booth | Jul 1995 | A |
5444810 | Szegda | Aug 1995 | A |
5455548 | Grandchamp et al. | Oct 1995 | A |
5456611 | Henry et al. | Oct 1995 | A |
5456614 | Szegda | Oct 1995 | A |
5466173 | Down | Nov 1995 | A |
5470257 | Szegda | Nov 1995 | A |
5494454 | Johnsen | Feb 1996 | A |
5501616 | Holliday | Mar 1996 | A |
5518420 | Pitschi | May 1996 | A |
5525076 | Down | Jun 1996 | A |
5542861 | Anhalt et al. | Aug 1996 | A |
5548088 | Gray et al. | Aug 1996 | A |
5561900 | Hosier, Sr. | Oct 1996 | A |
5571028 | Szegda | Nov 1996 | A |
5586910 | Del Negro et al. | Dec 1996 | A |
5598132 | Stabile | Jan 1997 | A |
5607325 | Toma | Mar 1997 | A |
5619015 | Kirma | Apr 1997 | A |
5651698 | Locati et al. | Jul 1997 | A |
5651699 | Holliday | Jul 1997 | A |
5662489 | Stirling | Sep 1997 | A |
5667405 | Holliday | Sep 1997 | A |
5785554 | Ohshiro | Jul 1998 | A |
5795188 | Harwath | Aug 1998 | A |
5863220 | Holliday | Jan 1999 | A |
5938474 | Nelson | Aug 1999 | A |
5957724 | Lester | Sep 1999 | A |
5975951 | Burris et al. | Nov 1999 | A |
5984723 | Wild | Nov 1999 | A |
5993254 | Pitschi et al. | Nov 1999 | A |
5997350 | Burris et al. | Dec 1999 | A |
6019636 | Langham | Feb 2000 | A |
6027373 | Gray et al. | Feb 2000 | A |
6032358 | Wild | Mar 2000 | A |
6034325 | Nattel et al. | Mar 2000 | A |
6036237 | Sweeney | Mar 2000 | A |
RE36700 | McCarthy | May 2000 | E |
6080015 | Andreescu | Jun 2000 | A |
6089912 | Tanis et al. | Jul 2000 | A |
6089913 | Holliday | Jul 2000 | A |
6146197 | Holliday et al. | Nov 2000 | A |
6159046 | Wong | Dec 2000 | A |
6168455 | Hussaini | Jan 2001 | B1 |
6217380 | Nelson et al. | Apr 2001 | B1 |
6293004 | Holliday | Sep 2001 | B1 |
6396367 | Rosenberger | May 2002 | B1 |
6409536 | Kanda et al. | Jun 2002 | B1 |
6471545 | Hosier, Sr. | Oct 2002 | B1 |
6536103 | Holland et al. | Mar 2003 | B1 |
6551136 | Johnsen et al. | Apr 2003 | B2 |
6607398 | Henningsen | Aug 2003 | B2 |
6634906 | Yeh | Oct 2003 | B1 |
6648683 | Youtsey | Nov 2003 | B2 |
6667440 | Nelson et al. | Dec 2003 | B2 |
6733336 | Montena et al. | May 2004 | B1 |
6780052 | Montena et al. | Aug 2004 | B2 |
6808415 | Montena | Oct 2004 | B1 |
6808417 | Yoshida | Oct 2004 | B2 |
6840803 | Wlos et al. | Jan 2005 | B2 |
6887103 | Montena et al. | May 2005 | B2 |
6994588 | Montena | Feb 2006 | B2 |
7011546 | Vaccaro | Mar 2006 | B2 |
7029304 | Montena | Apr 2006 | B2 |
7044785 | Harwath et al. | May 2006 | B2 |
7104839 | Henningsen | Sep 2006 | B2 |
7108547 | Kisling et al. | Sep 2006 | B2 |
7127806 | Nelson et al. | Oct 2006 | B2 |
7128603 | Burris et al. | Oct 2006 | B2 |
7140914 | Kojima | Nov 2006 | B2 |
7207838 | Andreescu | Apr 2007 | B2 |
7217154 | Harwath | May 2007 | B2 |
7261581 | Henningsen | Aug 2007 | B2 |
7275957 | Wlos | Oct 2007 | B1 |
7311554 | Jackson et al. | Dec 2007 | B1 |
7335059 | Vaccaro | Feb 2008 | B2 |
7357671 | Wild et al. | Apr 2008 | B2 |
7381089 | Hosler, Sr. | Jun 2008 | B2 |
7384307 | Wang | Jun 2008 | B1 |
7435135 | Wlos | Oct 2008 | B2 |
7488209 | Vaccaro | Feb 2009 | B2 |
7527512 | Montena | May 2009 | B2 |
7588460 | Malloy et al. | Sep 2009 | B2 |
7637774 | Vaccaro | Dec 2009 | B1 |
7934954 | Chawgo et al. | May 2011 | B1 |
20010051448 | Gonzales | Dec 2001 | A1 |
20050159043 | Harwath et al. | Jul 2005 | A1 |
20050159044 | Harwath et al. | Jul 2005 | A1 |
20070123101 | Palinkas | May 2007 | A1 |
20070190854 | Harwath | Aug 2007 | A1 |
20090019704 | Ehret et al. | Jan 2009 | A1 |
20090233482 | Chawgo et al. | Sep 2009 | A1 |
20110239451 | Montena et al. | Oct 2011 | A1 |
20110239455 | Montena et al. | Oct 2011 | A1 |
20110244721 | Amidon | Oct 2011 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
29800824 | Apr 1998 | DE |
0010567 | May 1980 | EP |
0918370 | May 1999 | EP |
2063501 | May 2009 | EP |
2002373743 | Dec 2002 | JP |
Entry |
---|
Amidon, J., Impedance Management in Coaxial Cable Terminations, U.S. Appl. No. 12/753,719, filed Apr. 2, 2010. |
Montena, N. et al., Coaxial Cable Preparation Tools, U.S. Appl. No. 12/753,729, filed Apr. 2, 2010. |
Montena, N. and Chawgo, S., Passive Intermodulation and Impedance Management in Coaxial Cable Terminations, U.S. Appl. No. 12/753,742, filed Apr. 2, 2010. |
Chawgo, S., et al., Coaxial Cable Compression Connectors, U.S. Appl. No. 12/753,735, filed Apr. 2, 2010, Office Action Summary, dated Sep. 8, 2010. |
Chawgo, S., et al., Coaxial Cable Compression Connectors, U.S. Appl. No. 12/753,735, filed Apr. 2, 2010, Notice of Allowance, dated Dec. 23, 2010. |
PCT/US2011/031011 International Search Report and Written Opinion. Date of Mailing: Oct. 31, 2011. 10 pp. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20110244722 A1 | Oct 2011 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 12753735 | Apr 2010 | US |
Child | 13093937 | US |