1. Field of the Invention
The invention relates to a coaxial two-component cartridge.
2. Prior Art
Such coaxial two-component cartridges are advantageously manufactured so that the outer tube and the inner tube are manufactured separately. The two tubes must then be assembled together at a later time in order to obtain a coaxial cartridge. A suitable engagement must guarantee that the inner tube is rigidly anchored to the outer tube. The inner tube must not loosen when the cartridge is being transported or emptied. An inner tube that is not well-fastened, especially one that is no longer arranged in the center, can cause problems in an automatic emptying device because the emptying device might no longer be able to find the inner tube. Furthermore, when the cartridge is squeezed, the resulting internal pressure in the cartridge also acts on the floor of the inner tube, which can have the effect, if there is inadequate anchoring, of making the inner tube come loose, so that the cartridge can no longer be squeezed.
According to Utility Model DE 298 07 938 U1, two-part coaxial cartridges made from plastic are known. The engagement is released by a shoulder lying in one plane in the neck region of the outer tube and associated catch tabs on the inner tube. [Formation of] the shoulder in the outer tube is solved in terms of tool technology in that a separating plane is provided in the region of the shoulder. When opening the mold, here, the tool part engaging the tube above the separating plane is removed upward and the tool part engaging the tube below the separating plane is removed downward. With this method, it is possible to produce a shoulder with an arbitrary width, so that the locking tab can be engaged and held without a problem. However, because both sides must be removed from the mold, it is not possible with this design to produce a cartridge with a molded seal that is integrated with the outer tube. Instead, it requires an additional sealing cap, which means increased production and assembly costs.
In principle, the shoulder can also be demolded from the rear as an undercut, so that the cartridge can be produced in a closed configuration with a molded sealing cover. Because the undercut requires forcible ejection, the shoulder cannot be made with sharp edges and the width of the shoulder is limited to a few tenths of a millimeter. This leads to a greatly reduced, potentially inadequate, retaining force.
A two-part coaxial cartridge is known From DE 199 43 877 A1 in which the inner tube is produced from aluminum. Sawtooth-shaped ribs are formed on the inner tube. The aluminum ribs dig into the soft outer tube consisting of plastic during pressing and thus form a tight anchoring effect. The disadvantage of this solution is that the use of aluminum tubes is expensive, and a cartridge consisting of metal and plastic creates a problem ecologically with regard to disposal.
Taking into consideration this prior art, the task of the invention is to create a two-part coaxial cartridge that can be produced from economical plastic and is suitable for a closed outlet that is connected integrally to the cartridge and that is opened by ripping, cutting, or breaking. In addition, this coaxial cartridge preserves the anchoring of the inner tube and guarantees a central positioning of the same.
The task is solved according to the invention by the features disclosed hereinafter, and the advantageous refinements of the invention as described.
By means of the invention, the retaining force for fixing the inner tube relative to the outer tube is distributed through a Christmas tree-like channel structure on the outer side of the neck of the inner tube to a plurality of channel branches on the inner side of the neck of the outer tube, and thus uniformly over a significant portion of the length of both necks. This guarantees a fixed seat of the connection and, also, a stable coaxial position of both tubes relative to each other with only a minimal channel depth and a rounded channel shape.
In this way, the inner profile of the outer tube, which features a plurality of successive channels, is manufactured advantageously in an injection-molding process with final removal from the mold in a single direction, namely opposite the later installation direction of the inner tube. To realize a minimal channel depth, a forced removal is possible, and to realize the channels as threads, it is also possible to cut the threads.
The connection of the two tubes can be realized by axial pressing, wherein the ribs are bent back against the installation direction and remain permanently in this deformed state in order to exert an axial retaining force on the inner tube. For a realization of the channels and ribs as matching threads, the connection can also be produced by rotation, wherein the retaining force is produced from the thread connection.
In the following, embodiments of the invention are described with reference to the drawings. Shown here are:
According to a first embodiment shown in
The mechanical connection of the two tubes 2 and 3 is realized in the region of the necks 6 and 7 respectively, forming the outlet channels for the two components. Here, the neck 6 of the outer tube 2 features in its lower region on the inner side a plurality of similar, successive channels 8 that are equidistant in the axial direction. The depth of the channels 8 is dimensioned such that, for production by injection molding, a forced removal on the inner side of the neck 6 is still possible. Starting from the lower end of the neck 6, the grooves 8 extend over approximately more than its lower half in the axial direction. They lie in parallel planes the normal direction of which is the axial direction of the cartridge 1.
As a counterpart to the channels 8 on the inner side of the neck 6 of the outer tube 2, the neck 7 of the inner tube 3 features on its outer side a plurality of similar, successive integrated ribs 9, which are likewise equidistant in the axial direction. In this way, the axial spacing of the ribs 9 is the same as that of the channels 8. The outer diameter of the neck 7 of the inner tube 3, including the ribs 9, is greater than the clearance diameter of the channels 8. The axial length of the region of the neck 7 of the inner tube 3 over which the ribs 9 extend corresponds approximately to the axial length of the region of the neck 6 of the outer tube 23 over which the channels 8 extend, i.e., the number of ribs 9 agrees at least approximately with the number of channels 8, with this not, however, being an exact match. The number of grooves 8 and ribs 9 lies between 10 and 15, and is 13 for the example shown in
As can be seen from
When, as shown in
The axial thickness of the ribs 9 on the outer side of the inner tube 3 is designed in relation to their radial length so that the ribs bend far enough downward when a predetermined axial force is exerted on the inner tube 3, in the position shown in
For axial centering of the neck 7 of the inner tube 3 relative to the neck 6 of the outer tube 2, several, i.e., at least three, four in the example shown, tabs 17 are formed integrally on the neck 7 above the ribs 10. These tabs have a diagonal outer surface. Matching this configuration, the transition 11 of the outer tube 2 is likewise angled at its neck 6 on the inner side, so that from a non-centered position of the two tubes 2 and 3 relative to each other, when an axial force is exerted on the inner tube 3 the diagonal outer surface of the tab 17 that first contacts the outer tube 2 slides along the aforementioned angled inner side of the transition 11, and can move the inner tube 3 toward the center position.
At the top right,
From the detail enlargement in
For an axial force exerted on the inner tube 3 opposite that of its installation direction, the ribs 9 permit a large axial force component to be transferred to the lower channel sides due to their slope and therefore prevent possible unlocking, i.e., loosening of the connection.
A side view of the inner tube 3 of the cartridge 1 in the unassembled original state is shown enlarged in
The outer diameter of the neck 7 of the inner tube 3 including the ribs 9, as well as the inner diameter of the neck 6 of the outer tube 2 decreases slightly in the direction towards the corresponding outlet end. In the present case, this slight amount of taper, which is known for injection-molded parts in view of their ejection, means that the force necessary for pressing the inner neck 7 into the outer neck 6 increases somewhat less strongly with increasing pressing depth than would be the case for uniform outer or inner diameters. However, the outer diameter of the inner neck 7 at the height of the topmost of the ribs 9, including the same, is greater than even the inner diameter of the outer neck 6 at its lower beginning, so that already the topmost of the ribs 9 must be bent downward when it is pressed into the lowermost of the channels 8 in order to be able to be locked.
From the cross section along the line A—A in
The essentially radial end wall 19 of the inner tube 3 extends like a flange in the region of the ribs 10 projecting upward away from it over the envelope surface of the inner tube 3, and thus likewise has essentially the shape of a cross. This configuration enables a correspondingly greater length of the ribs 10, which realizes a correspondingly more stable support of the inner tube 3 against the end wall 12 of the outer tube 2.
A second embodiment of the present invention is shown in
For the second embodiment, the shape of the outer tube 102 for the most part agrees with that of the previously described first embodiment. In relation to the outer tube 102, the inner tube 103 has a greater diameter in comparison to the first embodiment, which is not important, however. The essential difference relative to the first embodiment lies in the shape of the ribs 109 on the outer side of the neck 107 of the inner tube 103 as well as in the matching shape of the channels 108 on the inner side of the neck 106 of the outer tube 102.
As can be seen from
The ribs 109 are thicker in the axial direction of the cartridge 101 than for the first embodiment and, in contrast to that embodiment, they are not arranged, so that for assembly of the cartridge 101 the ribs are brought into a deformed state that remains permanent in the final assembly state. Instead, the ribs 109 are either deformed insignificantly, which is the case when the connection between the outer tube 102 and the inner tube 103 is realized by rotating the outer thread formed by the ribs 109 in the inner thread formed by the channels 108, or the neck 107 of the inner tube 103 is pressed into the neck 106 of the outer tube 102 as in the first embodiment, with this leading to temporary elastic deformations and with the ribs snapping over several thread pitches, before they lock in each other in the final position of the two tubes 102 and 103. The last mentioned assembly method obviously assumes a relatively low depth at least in one of the two threads, wherein preferably the inner thread formed by the channels 109 is designed to be flat so that it can be removed from the mold by forcible ejection.
Otherwise, the construction of the second embodiment essentially corresponds to that of the first, so that a repeated explanation of the other construction features, such as the ribs 110 acting as axial stops and the rib-free, peripheral segments 118 of the neck 107 creating vertical outlet channels, can be eliminated.
The preceding description of the two embodiments discloses a series of modifications of the invention for someone skilled in the art. These include varying, e.g., the number of peripheral segments with ribs, their lengths in relation to the rib-free segments, as well as their arrangement in the peripheral position across the height. Similarly, the profile of the ribs and the channels in the longitudinal section, as well as the length of the neck sections provided with ribs or channels, e.g., can also be varied. Such modifications and comparable modifications that are subject to the discretion of someone skilled in the art should be included under the protection of the patent.
Number | Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
203 16 879 U | Oct 2003 | DE | national |
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
750565 | Austin | Jan 1904 | A |
1469009 | Coleman | Sep 1923 | A |
1645032 | Wilson | Oct 1927 | A |
2066956 | Williams | Jan 1937 | A |
2172602 | Williams | Sep 1939 | A |
2218092 | Nitardy | Oct 1940 | A |
3586239 | Blass | Jun 1971 | A |
3958761 | Watanabe | May 1976 | A |
4771919 | Ernst | Sep 1988 | A |
5295613 | Barthomeuf et al. | Mar 1994 | A |
5738388 | Sundelin | Apr 1998 | A |
6283511 | Kamp | Sep 2001 | B1 |
6634524 | Helmenstein | Oct 2003 | B1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
11 12 447 | Aug 1961 | DE |
692 04 232 | May 1996 | DE |
199 19 748 | Nov 1999 | DE |
199 43 877 | Mar 2001 | DE |
1202911 | Jan 1960 | FR |
2676210 | Apr 1992 | FR |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20050093300 A1 | May 2005 | US |