Coccidiosis vaccines

This invention relates to coccidiosis vaccines, and in particular to vaccines for preventing and combatting coccidiosis in poultry.
Coccidiosis is a disease of animals and birds caused by protozoal parasites called coccidia. In many cases, under natural environmental conditions, this disease is relatively benign; though with domesticated animals infections can be severe especially in poultry where the use of intensive rearing conditions favours the reproduction of the parasites. Coccidiosis of poultry is caused by coccidia belonging to the genus Eimeria which invade the tissue of the intestinal tract where some species of the parasite may cause haemorrhage, all species may cause weight loss and in the case of severe infection most may cause death. Thus the prevention and control of this disease is of great commercial importance in the chicken and egg production industries.
Anticoccidial drugs are widely used to prevent and combat the disease of coccidiosis in poultry, the drugs normally being given to the birds together with their feed. The use of anticoccidial drugs is not altogether satisfactory, however, in view of expense and also effectiveness which is limited by emergence of drug resistant strains of coccidia requiring a continued search for new effect anti-coccidial agents and the attendant expense of meeting national safety and efficacy regulations.
Coccidiosis of chickens is caused by seven main species of Eimeria parasites: E. acervulina, E. brunetti, E. maxima, E. mivati, E. praecox, E. necatrix and E. tenella; the coccidia undergoing and completing a complex life cycle in the tissues of the intestinal tract of the chicken. The first invasive forms of the parasite are sporozoites which are released from sporocysts derived from sporulated oocysts, the coccidia then passing through a number of asexual multiplicative phases (schizogony) having merozoite invasive forms and culminating in a sexual reproductive phase (gametogony) giving rise to oocysts which are passed from the bird with faecal material and which, on becoming infective (sporulated), act as a source of further infection.
In view of the inherent disadvantages of anticoccidial drugs mentioned previously attempts have been made to develop vaccines to protect poultry against coccidial infection. Hitherto, these vaccines have generally been based upon low doses of live, pathogenic organisms, and thus are not wholly desirable as it is possible that the vaccine itself can give rise to field cases of coccidiosis. More recently, some species of Eimeria parasites, namely E. mivati and E. tenella, have been attenuated in embryonated eggs, and thus there now exists a limited possibility of preparing a vaccine from live, attenuated, non-pathogenic organisms. Unfortunately, however, immunity is species specific and the attenuation of all Eimeria species is necessary for production of a fully effective attenuated coccidiosis vaccine. Moreover, attempts to attenuate other species of Eimeria, including E. maxima, E. brunetti and especially the highly pathogenic species E. necatrix, have proved unsuccessful, E. necatrix, appearing to be capable of completing the sexual reproductive stages of its life cycle only in the natural host, the chicken. Growth of E. necatrix through its whole life cycle in embryonated eggs was reported some time ago (Shibalova, Acta Protozoologica, Warszawa, 1972, Volume IX, fasc. 19, pages 299-303), but subsequent attempts to repeat this work have proved completely unsuccessful (P. L. Long, "The growth of Eimeria in cultured cells and in chicken embryos: a review", Proceedings of the Symposium on Coccidia and Related Organisms, Ontario 1974 page 63), and it had not been generally accepted that E. necatrix can be propagated through its complete life cycle in embryonated eggs.
It has now been found, contrary to expectation, that E. necatrix can be propagated throughout its complete life cycle in embryonated eggs, and further that repeated passaging of this organism in embryonated eggs leads to attenuation of the parasite.
Accordingly the present invention comprises a process in which pathogenic E. necatrix is passaged in embryonated eggs for a sufficient number of passages to produce an attenuated strain of E. necatrix suitable for use in the production of a live, attenuated vaccine.
Thus, the invention also includes egg attenuated strains of E. necatrix suitable for use in live attenuated vaccines.
Furthermore the invention includes vaccines, processes for the production of vaccines and methods of preventing and controlling coccidiosis in poultry using attenuated strains of E. necatrix according to the invention.
Eggs from any suitable breed of chicken may be used for attenuation of E. necatrix according to the invention, and in particular attenuation is carried out in the chorioallantoic membrane (CAM) of embryonated eggs. It has been found that eggs of some breeds of chickens appear to give better yields of parasite oocysts than eggs of other breeds. Thus, for instance, embryonated Rhode Island Red (RIR) eggs appear to give increased yields of oocysts as compared with Brown Leghorn (BrL) eggs.
Generally also, any suitable in ovo culture conditions may be employed during attenuation of E. necatrix. Advantageously, however, it has been found that relatively elevated temperatures, e.g. temperatures of about 41.degree. C., e.g. 39.degree.-43.degree. C., are desirable for growth of E. necatrix in embryonated eggs. Furthermore, it has been found that regular turning of eggs, e.g. a minimum of at least once or twice a day, is desirable during propagation in the CAM, and for example, an automatic incubation facility which automatically turns the eggs about 48 times during the course of one day has been found to give highly successful results.
Embryonated eggs may be inoculated with sporozoites of E. necatrix and oocysts subsequently recovered from the eggs, usually from the urate and other debris present in the allantoic fluid. Initially it may be desirable to use relatively high doses of sporozoites, usually about 1.times.10.sup.5 sporozoites or more per egg, e.g. from 1.times.10.sup.5 up to 1.times.10.sup.7 sporozoites per egg, to establish an egg-adapted strain, though subsequently, e.g. after about 13-14 passages, lower doses, e.g. about 5.times.10.sup.4 sporozoites or less per egg, are generally required. Also it may be desirable, particularly during the initial stages of passaging e.g. for about the first 6-10 egg passages, to carry out alternate passages in eggs and chickens so as to obtain a reasonable yield of oocysts. Harvesting of oocysts may be carried out after a suitable period of incubation for each passage, usually at least 6 or 7 days after inoculation, though preferably after a longer period, e.g. about 7-8 days. Relatively short incubation periods, e.g. 6 or 7 days or even as little as 5 days in some cases, may be used when selection for precocious development is imposed on the parasite during passaging. During the earlier passages, however, longer periods of incubation, e.g. about 8 days, are desirable to obtain satisfactory yields of oocysts, and such longer incubation periods may also be used during later stages of passaging to obtain enhanced oocyst yields.
Typically passaging is continued for a sufficient number of passages to produce a non-pathogenic strain of E. necatrix of suitable immunogenicity and stability for use in a live attenuated vaccine. In this regard, E. necatrix appears to behave anomalously on passaging when compared with other species of Eimeria, e.g. E. tenella, which have been previously attenuated by passaging in eggs. It has been found that in parallel with loss of pathogenicity on passaging immunogenicity also decreased, and furthermore that stability has not yet become a genetically stable trait at the stage at which useful immunogenicity still remains. Thus an attenuated strain of E. necatrix according to the invention represents an acceptable compromise between the opposing tendencies of decreasing immunogenicity as against increasing stability, coupled with non-pathogenicity.
It has been found in accordance with the present invention that from about 20 up to about 50 passages or more are required to produce a strain of E. necatrix suitable for use in a live attenuated vaccine. For instance, up to about 50 or 60 egg passages may be used when selection pressures such as selection for precocious development are relaxed during passaging; though under such relaxed selection conditions, from about 30 up to about 50 passages are normally required, preferably from about 35 to about 39 passages. Alternatively when selection pressures, such as selection for precocious development, are imposed, as specifically described hereinafter, normally from about 20 up to about 40 passages, preferably from about 25 up to about 35 passages, or especially from about 28 up to about 33 passages are used.
The attenuated strains of the invention are characteristically altered with respect to the parent pathogenic strain by the passaging procedure and may be distinguished therefrom in terms of pathogenicity and adaptation to growth in eggs.
Thus attenuated strains of the invention typically do not cause death when administered to susceptible chickens, e.g. at doses of about 5.times.10.sup.4 of fresh oocysts per chicken. Preferably also, the attenuated strains cause only relatively minor changes to the gross appearance of the intestine on infection, and especially cause no actual weight loss (weight loss being determined on a group basis) when administered to chickens at doses of about 5.times.10.sup.4 of fresh oocysts per bird.
Additionally, the attenuated strains are typically of stability such that they are of reduced pathogenicity when compared with the parent pathogenic strain, after they have undergone at least 5, e.g. 5 or 6, or especially 10, consecutive chicken passages after attenuation and before administration to the susceptible chickens. Thus, for example an attenuated strain, attenuated by 29 passages in eggs followed by 6 consecutive passages in chickens, causes less than 50%, e.g. 30%, mortality in chickens at a dose of 5.times.10.sup.4 oocysts per chicken, compared with 100% mortality caused by the same dose of the pathogenic parent strain.
Thus, it will be appreciated that strains of E. necatrix attenuated according to the invention even after subsequent passaging in chickens are more advantageous, from the point of view of pathogenicity, for vaccine use than the parent pathogenic strains. Typically also the attenuated strains provide reasonable protection against subsequent challenge with virulent E. necatrix. Thus, attenuated strains usually provide at least 85% and preferably at least 95% protection against challenge with virulent E. necatrix, for example, as reckoned by a procedure in which immunised and non-immunised birds are given a small challenge of virulent organisms and the resultant output of oocysts in the immunised and non-immunised birds are compared.
Generally also attenuated strains according to the invention typically reproduce in chickens less readily, though grow in eggs more easily, than the parent pathogenic strains. Thus, for example, a 5.times.10.sup.3 dose of oocysts of the parent strain produces a yield of about 25.times.10.sup.6 oocysts in chickens whereas a 25.times.10.sup.3 dose of an attenuated strain after 29 egg passages produces only about 1.times.10.sup.6 oocysts, and after 36 egg passages produces only about 0.4.times.10.sup.6 oocysts. Conversely, as regards growth in eggs, for example, a 10.sup.5 dose of sporozoites of the parent pathogenic strain per egg gave a yield of only 3.times.10.sup.3 oocysts after 8 days incubation; whereas a 2.2.times.10.sup.4 dose of sporozoites per egg of a strain attenuated by 29 egg passages gave a yield of 560.times.10.sup.3 oocysts after only 6 days incubation.
Attenuated non-pathogenic strains of E. necatrix according to the invention may be formulated as desired into vaccines for prevention and control of coccidiosis in poultry. Attenuated E. necatrix, which may be in the form of sporocysts, though is usually in the form of oocysts, may be formulated into vaccines with other strains of Eimeria including live pathogenic strains of Eimeria such as E. maxima, E. acervulina and E. brunetti, usually as low doses thereof, and/or preferably other attenuated non-pathogenic strains of Eimeria such as E. tenella and E. mivati. Such combined coccidiosis vaccines preferably contain, in addition to attenuated E. necatrix, strains of all the major coccidia of poultry, i.e. E. acervulina, E. brunetti, E. maxima, E. mivati and E. tenella, preferably as attenuated strains thereof, and may also contain strains of E. praecox to provide a fully effective vaccine for use against coccidiosis of poultry.
In preferred embodiments vaccines according to the present invention comprise, in addition to egg attenuated E. necatrix, egg attenuated E. tenella and/or egg attenuated E. mivati, and/or E. acervulina attenuated by selection for precocious development in the chicken. In addition or alternatively E. tenella, and possibly also E. mivati, may be attenuated by selection for precocious development in the chicken. Vaccines according to the invention may also comprise low doses of pathogenic E. maxima, this species being highly immunogenic and therefore requiring only a low dose for effective protection.
Vaccines according to the invention may also comprise antigenic material from other species of organisms besides Eimeria, such as viruses.
The vaccines of the invention may be in any suitable form for administration to poultry including those forms in which coccidiosis vaccines have been provided in the past, e.g. COCCIVAC. Vaccine is typically in the form of a suspension of oocysts or sporocysts, normally a suspension in a sterile aqueous medium, which may contain suspending agents such as gelatin. Oocysts or sporocysts may be pretreated prior to vaccine formulation; for instance, treated with an agent e.g. hypochlorite or "Chlorox", to render the oocysts more readily infective e.g. for use with young birds. The vaccine may be administered to birds by intravenous or intraperitoneal injection, but this is generally an inefficient ultilisation of the vaccine and vaccine is preferably administered by mouth. For instance, vaccine may be given individually by mouth in the form of graded doses of oocysts, e.g. up to about 5.times.10.sup.3 oocysts of each strain per bird, though such individual vaccination is normally only economically feasible for vaccination of layer, replacement and breeder birds. In preferred methods for vaccination of broiler chickens, oocysts are given to the chickens together with their feed, e.g. in bulk feed or in a feed concentrate alternative, or drinking water. Feed and drinking water vaccination may be carried out by administering small doses of oocysts, e.g. 10-10.sup.3 oocysts of each strain per day, over an extended period of time, e.g. 1-5 weeks. Alternatively drinking water vaccination may be carried out by giving the birds one or two larger doses of about 5.times.10.sup.3 oocysts e.g. from about 5.times.10.sup.2 up to about 5.times.10.sup.4 oocysts, of each strain per bird. Such feed and drinking water vaccines may be made from concentrated stock vaccine preparations, usually comprising aqueous suspensions of oocysts.
The present invention is concerned with the preparation of a "live" vaccine, and thus it will be appreciated that the attenuated strains or the vaccine itself may be used as a seed material for production of oocysts or sporocysts, preferably by propagation in eggs, for use in vaccine. Thus the invention includes per se attenuated strains of E. necatrix produced by the method of the invention. Birds may be vaccinated at any suitable age, and are usually at least 3 days old before first vaccination, though it may be possible to vaccinate as early as one day old if sporozoites are used. When two doses of vaccine are used, the first is normally given when the birds are 3 days to a week old and subsequently after a further 1-10 weeks dependent upon the type of bird being vaccinated.
Generally also the birds are preferably maintained under conditions which permit them access to their litter allowing reinfection with oocysts derived from the vaccine, and thereby advantageously increasing the level of immunological protection. For example, the litter may be dampened periodically to assist sporulation of the oocysts.
It will be appreciated from the foregoing that the present invention is primarily concerned with processes for attenuation of pathogenic E. necatrix by passaging in embryonated eggs, advantageously to provide live attenuated E. necatrix vaccines for protection of poultry. In as far, however, as the live attenuated strains of E. necatrix produced on passaging are new organisms produced by human intervention from the parent pathogenic strain, the present invention also concerns new and useful organisms. Thus, for better exemplification of the invention, samples of representative attenuated strains of E. necatrix have been deposited with the Central Veterinary Laboratory, Weybridge, Surrey, England, a U.K. Government laboratory having extensive experience of maintaining cultures of poultry parasites, including coccidia. Cultures of strains of E. necatrix attenuated by 21, 32 and 48 egg passages were deposited with the Central Veterinary Laboratory on the 21st August 1980 and are identified as strains L/5B/G/21, L/5B/G/32 and L/5B/G/48 respectively, and also as strains B3/6/R/21, B3/6/R/32 and B3/6/R/48 respectively. These and other attenuated strains of E. necatrix of the invention exhibit the typical characteristics of coccidia of species E. necatrix, though having pathogenicity and adaptation of growth in eggs altered as herein described with respect to the parent pathogenic strain.

The invention is further described by way of illustration only in Examples 1 and 2 which relate to the attenuation of E. necatrix in embryonated eggs and refer to the accompanying diagrams:
FIG. 1 which is a graph comparing body weight gains of chickens after infection with parent pathogenic organisms with those of chickens infected with organisms attenuated by 20 chicken passages, and
FIG. 2 which is a similar graph comparing strains attenuated by 36 egg passages, and 29 egg passages plus 6 consecutive chicken passages with the fully pathogenic parent strain.
Example 3 is included to describe a method, as yet unpublished, for attenuating E. acervulina by selection for precocious development in the chicken and refers to FIG. 3 which is a graph comparing body weight gains of chickens after infection with the parent pathogenic strain of E. acervulina (H) with those of chickens infected with the attenuated, precocious line of E. acervulina (HP).
EXAMPLE 1
The Houghton (H) strain of E. necatrix isolated at Houghton in December 1956 and described by Horton-Smith and Long (Journal of Comparative Pathology and Therapeutics (1959), 77, 315-325) was used as the starting material in the production of an attenuated strain of E. necatrix according to the invention.
Sporozoites were obtained as described by Long (Journal of Comparative Pathology (1972), 82, 439-445) and were inoculated into the allantoic cavity of eggs by the method of Long (Journal of Comparative Pathology (1972), 82, 429-437).
In a preliminary experiment, thirty 10-day-old embryonating Brown Leghorn (BrL) eggs given 1.3.times.10.sup.5 sporozoites of E. necatrix (H) were examined for oocysts 6, 7 and 8 days after inoculation. In one egg examined on the sixth day no oocysts were found, but an average of 2.5.times.10.sup.3 oocysts was recovered from each of 9 eggs on the seventh day. At 190 h the urate of the remaining 20 eggs was examined and a total of 0.39.times.10.sup.6 oocysts were recovered. These oocysts sporulated and were subsequently inoculated into 3-week-old Light Sussex (LS) chickens to confirm the identity of the parasites recovered from eggs as E. necatrix.
The embryonating eggs used in the above and subsequent experiments were maintained at 37.degree. C. for the first 10 days of incubation and after inoculation at this time with sporozoites the temperature was raised to 41.degree. C. Similarly occysts were recovered from eggs 6, 7 or 8 days after inoculation using the trypsin-digest method described by Long in the second of the above mentioned Journal of Comparative Pathology publications.
Serial Passage
A dose response experiment in which eggs were inoculated with 0.5, 1, 2 or 3.times.10.sup.5 sporozoites indicated that the optimum dose with regard to yield of oocysts was 1.times.10.sup.5. Yields were consistently poor, however, even with this dose and in order to establish an egg-adapted line it was found necessary initially to carry out alternate egg and chicken passages, up to the first eight egg passages. Replacement of BrL eggs by RIR eggs, and turning of the eggs in the incubator, however, was found to increase the number of oocysts recovered on the eighth day after inoculation. In view of this improvement the inoculum of sporozoites was reduced to about 6.times.10.sup.4 sporozoites per egg by the sixteenth passage.
Initially very few oocysts appeared in the urate by the seventh day and it was found necessary to continue incubation until after the eighth day to obtain sufficient parasites for further passages. Oocysts recovered at this time sporulated well and sporulation rates between 80 and 90% were usual.
Little mortality due to coccidiosis was observed throughout the passages, although some deaths occurred between 4 and 6 days after inoculation. These, and other data which summarise the development of E. necatrix during the first twenty passages in eggs, are given in Table 1 below.
With the apparent step-wise improvement in yield of oocysts particularly between the eighth and fourteenth passage, it became possible thereafter to recover sufficient parasites 7, and even 6 days after inoculation and to impose upon the parasite a more severe selection for egg-adaptation.
TABLE 1______________________________________The reproduction of E. necatrix in eggs during serial passagePas- Number Day after Mor-age Breed sporozoites inoculation Oocysts tal-Num- of egg given/egg when oocysts recovered/ ityber used (.times. 10.sup.-3) harvested egg(.times.10.sup.-3) (%)______________________________________1.sub.0 BrL 100 8 3 02.sub.1 BrL 50 8 3 03.sub.2 BrL 100 8 2 74.sub.3 BrL 100 8 12 195.sub.3 BrL 50 8 3 06.sub.4 BrL 100 8 2 06.sub.4 BrL 150 8 10 156.sub.4 BrL 200 8 4 57.sub.6 BrL 110 8 4 57.sub.6 RIR 110 8 65 28.sub.7 RIR 90 8 40 18.sub.7 RIR 45 8 7 09.sub.7 RIR 90 8 56 110.sub.7 RIR 110 8 450 711.sub.7 RIR 100 8 340 012.sub.7 RIR 85 8 115 513.sub.7 RIR 100 8 910 214.sub.7 RIR 100 8 1,300 014.sub.7 RIR 50 8 730 014.sub.7 RIR 100 7 850 015.sub.7 RIR 100 7 750 116.sub.7 RIR 85 6 (140h) 10 217.sub.7 RIR 65 7 1,280 018.sub.7 RIR 55 6 (140h) 10 019.sub.7 RIR 53 7 1,330 020.sub.7 RIR 52 7 840 0______________________________________
The numerical code used to indicate passage number in Table 1 comprises a main number indicating the number of egg passages and a subscript number indicating the number of chicken passages used, and is employed elsewhere in the description. Thus E. necatrix NA 20.sub.7 indicates an egg-adapted line of E. necatrix which has undergone 20 passages including initially 7 intermittent passages in chickens.
Effect of E. necatrix (H) and E. necatrix (NA 20.sub.7) on the body weight gain of 3-weeks-old LS chickens and lesion scores
Body weight gain
For this experiment five groups each consisting of three sub-groups of ten chickens were used. Group 1 was given 1.times.10.sup.4 oocysts of E. necatrix (NA 20.sub.7); group 2 was given 1.times.10.sup.4 oocysts of E. necatrix (H); group 3 was given 5.times.10.sup.4 oocysts of E. necatrix (NA 20.sub.7) and group 4 was given 5.times.10.sup.4 oocysts of E. necatrix (H). Group 5 was not infected. The birds were weighed individually one day before infection (D-1), and 4, 6, 7, 8, 11 and 14 days after infection. The body weights are shown in the accompanying diagram FIG. 1, each value given being the mean determined from observations on the 30 chickens (or survivors) in each group. Details of the deaths occurring in inoculated groups (1-4) are given in Table 2 below.
TABLE 2______________________________________Pathogenicity of E. necatrix (NA 20.sub.7) and E. necatrix (H):Summary of mortality Per- cent-Parasite and age Days after infection ondose of oocysts Number mor- which deaths occurredgiven of birds tality 5 6 7 8 9 10 11______________________________________NA20 1 .times. 10.sup.4 30 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0H 1 .times. 10.sup.4 30 3 0 1 0 0 0 0 0NA20 5 .times. 10.sup.4 30 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0H 5 .times. 10.sup.4 30 40 2 5 3 2 0 0 1______________________________________
The non-passaged parent strain (E. necatrix (H)) was found to be highly pathogenic and caused loss in body weight beginning 4 days after inoculation at both dose levels, the weight loss being greatest for the highest dose level. One chicken given 1.times.10.sup.4 oocysts died, whilst 13 (40%) died in the group given 5.times.10.sup.4 oocysts. In contrast no deaths occurred in the groups inoculated with the egg-adapted line and, althugh the weight gain of infected chickens was depressed with respect to the controls, there was no weight loss. From the 6th day after inoculation the growth of chickens within groups 1 and 2 was significantly different (P<0.001) from the growth of chickens in groups 3 and 4.
Lesion Scores
Twenty chickens, each given 5.times.10.sup.4 oocysts of E. necatrix (NA 20.sub.7) or E. necatrix (H) were killed 6 days after inoculation and the intestinal lesions graded according to an arbitary scale between 0 and 4.
Grade 0 indicated no gross lesions; grade 1 presence of small scattered petechiae and white spots visible from the serosal surface; grade 2, numerous petechiae on the serosal surface and some slight ballooning of the intestine; grade 3 for extensive haemorrhage in the lumen and the presence of red or brown mucus, extensive petechiae on the serosal surface, marked ballooning of the intestine and the absence of normal intestinal contents. Grade 4 was reserved for dead birds.
Mean values obtained for the two infections were 3.2 and 1.2 for E. necatrix (H) and E. necatrix (NA 20.sub.7) respectively; 6 chickens given E. necatrix (H) died.
Immunogenicity of E. necatrix (NA 20.sub.7) and E. necatrix (H)
Two groups of 20, 3-weeks-old LS chickens maintained in four sub-groups of five, were given 1.times.10.sup.4 oocysts of either E. necatrix (NA 20.sub.7) or E. necatrix (H). Twelve days later both groups, with a further group of previously uninfected chickens, were challenged with 5.times.10.sup.2 oocysts of E. necatrix (H). Oocyst production between 6 and 13 days after inoculation was measured and the results are given below in Table 3.
TABLE 3______________________________________Cross-protection between E. necatrix (NA 207) and E. necatrix (H) Total oocysts produced Percent Parasite used for (.times. 10.sup.-6) per bird after cross- primary inoculation challenge inoculation protec-Group (Dose: 1 .times. 10.sup.4 with 5 .times. 10.sup.2 oocysts tion (c.f.No. oocysts) of E. necatrix (H) Group 3)______________________________________1 E. necatrix (NA 20.sub.7) 3.55 85.002 E. necatrix (H) 0.01 99.993 None 23.67______________________________________
Chickens given the parent strain (E. necatrix (H)) were almost completely protected against homologous challenge whereas those given the egg-adapted line showed 85% protection when compared with the non-immunised group challenged with E. necatrix (H). Two further groups of 10 chickens, similarly given a primary dose of 1.times.10.sup.4 oocysts of E. necatrix (NA 20.sub.7) or E. necatrix (H) were challenged, together with a non-immunised group, with 5.times.10.sup.4 oocysts of E. necatrix (H). These chickens were killed after 6 days and the lesions graded. Mean lesion scores per chicken for the three groups were 2.35 (E. necatrix (NA 20.sub.7)), 0.05 (E. necatrix (H)) and 2.80 (non-immunised controls).
EXAMPLE 2
E. necatrix (NA 20.sub.7) as produced in Example 1 was passaged further in eggs up to a total of 40 egg passages. Information concerning the development of E. necatrix during these further twenty passages is given below in Table 4, being an extension of the information already given for the first twenty passages in Table 1, Example 1. Selection pressure for precocious development was continued during these further passages, parasites having been collected at 5 or 6 days after inoculation after the 23rd passage. It will be appreciated, however, that considerably higher yields of oocysts can be obtained if selection pressures are relaxed and oocysts recovered at a later stage after inoculation e.g. 7 or 8 days, during these and previous passages.
TABLE 4______________________________________Reproduction of E. necatrix during serial passage in RIR eggs:oocysts collected 5, 6 or 7 days after inoculation of sporozoitesPass- No. sporozoites Day after inoculation No. oocystsage given per egg when oocysts were recovered perNo. (.times. 10.sup.-3) recovered egg (.times. 10.sup.-3)______________________________________21.sub.7 50 6 11022.sub.7 33 6 21023.sub.7 29 5 (125-127h) 124.sub.7 1 7 1025.sub.7 4 6 14026.sub.7 20 6 64027.sub.7 26 6 6028.sub.7 20 6 5029.sub.7 22 6 56030.sub.7 39 5 (125-127h) 2031.sub.7 44 5 (123-125h) 532.sub.7 27 6 74033.sub.7 23 5 (125-127h) 534.sub.7 20 6 1,00035.sub.7 28 5 (125-127h) 2036.sub.7 25 6 30037.sub.7 25 5 (123.sub.125h) 3038.sub.7 20 5 (123-125h) 1039.sub.7 15 6 61040.sub.7 8 6 980______________________________________
The immunogenicity of the egg-adapted line was determined after a total of 22 egg passages.
Immunogenicity of E. necatrix (NA 22.sub.7) in chickens maintained in floor pen isolators
Four groups of 30, 3-week-old chickens were used. Group 1 was given 1.times.10.sup.2 oocysts of E. necatrix (NA 22.sub.7); group 2 was given 1.times.10.sup.2 oocysts of E. necatrix (H) and groups 3 and 4 were not inoculated with oocysts. Six weeks later (day 41) groups 1, 2 and 3 were challenged with 5.times.10.sup.4 oocysts of E. necatrix (H). Group 4 was maintained as a non-immunised, non-challenged control group. The body weights of all chickens were measured at the time of primary infection (day 0), 41 days later--at the time of challenge--and 7 days after the challenge infection (day 48). All chickens were killed at the latter time and the lesions graded.
Body weight gains of immunised chickens (groups 1 and 2) and non-immunised control chickens in group 4 were not significantly different 41 days after the primary infection as shown in Table 5 below. The body weight gain of group 3 was significantly different to that of group 1 only (P<0.05).
TABLE 5______________________________________Body weight changes of chickens given E. necatrix and maintainedin litter pen isolators______________________________________Group Parasite used for Initial Weight gain numbernum- immunisation body weight day 0 to day 41ber (1 .times. 10.sup.2 oocysts) (g) (day 0) (g)______________________________________1 E. necatrix 197.7 864.5 (NA 22)2 E. necatrix (H) 197.7 814.13 None 197.7 785.0*4 None 197.3 802.5______________________________________ Challenged withGroup 5 .times. 10.sup.4 oocysts Weight gain Mean intestinal lesionnum- of E. necatrix (H) day 41 to score 7 days afterber at day 41 day 48 (g) challenge______________________________________1 YES 159.8 02 YES 158.3 03 YES -19.2*** 2.24 NO 164.7______________________________________ ***Significantly different from Groups 1, 2 and 4 (P<0.001)? *Significantly different from Group 1 (P<0.05)?
Following challenge with 5.times.10.sup.4 oocysts of E. necatrix (H) none of the immunised chickens died and their mean body weights (i.e groups 1 and 2) were not significantly different from that of group 4. In contrast, one chicken in group 3 died and the mean body weight was severely depressed with respect to group 4 (P<0.001). No coccidial lesions were seen in any of the chickens in groups 1 and 2 but a mean lesion score of 2.2 was recorded for group 3.
Stability of loss of pathogenicity of E. necatrix (NA 29.sub.7)
A preliminary experiment was conducted using two groups of 13 and one of 12, 3-weeks-old chickens. Each group was given 5.times.10.sup.4 oocysts and group 1 received E. necatrix (H); group 2 received E. necatrix (NA 30.sub.7) and group 3 received E. necatrix (NA 29.sub.7 +1). (The reference NA 29.sub.7 +1 indicates that the organisms had been passaged 29 times in eggs followed by a single passage in chickens.) Six days after inoculation the chickens were killed and the intestinal lesions scored.
Mean lesion scores for the groups given E. necatrix (H), E. necatrix (NA 30.sub.7) and E. necatrix (NA 29.sub.7 +1) were 2.62, 0 and 0.42 respectively, the overall results being given below in Table 6. Although the loss of pathogenicity of the egg-adapted line did not appear to be genetically stable, it is clear that full virulence (i.e. to that of the parent strain) was not restored. E. necatrix (NA 29.sub.7 +1) was passaged in chickens a further 5 times and its pathogenicity was then more critically evaluated against both the parent Houghton strain and the egg-adapted line.
TABLE 6______________________________________Lesion scores associated with infections of E. necatrix (H);E. necatrix (NA 30.sub.7) and E. necatrix (NA 29 + 1) Number of chickens showing a lesion score of:-Parasite given 0 1/2 1 11/2 2 21/2 3 31/2 4______________________________________E. necatrix (H) 0 0 0 1 3 1 6 1 0E. necatrix (NA 29 + 1) 6 3 4 0 0 0 0 0 0E. necatrix (NA 30) 13 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0______________________________________
Pathogenicity of E. necatrix (H), E. necatrix (NA 36.sub.7) and E. necatrix (NA 29.sub.7 +6) in 3-week-old LS chickens
Body weight gain
Five groups each consisting of 3 sub-groups of 10 chickens were used. Group 1 was given 5.times.10.sup.4 oocysts of E. necatrix (NA 36.sub.7), group 2 was given 2.times.10.sup.5 oocysts of E. necatrix (NA 36.sub.7), group 3 was given 5.times.10.sup.4 oocysts of E. necatrix (NA 29.sub.7 +6) and group 4 was given 5.times.10.sup.4 oocysts of E. necatrix (H). Group 5 was not inoculated, the chickens were weighed individually and assigned to the groups one day before inoculation (day -1) and then re-weighed 4, 6, 7, 8, 11 and 14 days after inoculation. The results obtained are given in the accompanying diagram FIG. 2, each value being the mean determined from observations on the 30 chickens (or survivors) in each group. No chickens given oocysts of E. necatrix (NA 36.sub.7) died, and throughout the duration of the experiment there were no significant differences between the weight gains of groups 1 and 2 and the non-infected control group 5. (The weight gains of groups 1 and 2 given 5.times.10.sup.4 and 2.times.10.sup.5 oocysts of E. necatrix (NA 36.sub.7), respectively, were identical and thus results for group 1 alone are shown.)
Severe coccidiosis resulted from inoculation of 5.times.10.sup.4 oocysts of both E. necatrix (NA 29.sub.7 +6) and E. necatrix (H) and the mortality rates were 10% (3/30) and 60% (18/30) respectively. The weight gains of these chickens were severely retarded with the greatest effect being associated with E. necatrix (H) infection.
Lesion Scores
Groups of 10, 3-weeks-old chickens were inoculated with 5.times.10.sup.4 oocysts of either E. necatrix (H), E. necatrix (NA 36.sub.7) or E. necatrix (NA 29.sub.7 +6) or 2.times.10.sup.5 oocysts of E. necatrix (NA 36.sub.7). Six days later the chickens were killed and the intestinal lesions scored. No lesions were associated with E. necatrix (NA 36.sub.7) infection, whereas all chickens given E. necatrix (H) died (lesion score of 4) and those given E. necatrix (NA 29.sub.7 +6) showed a mean lesion score of 3.15. The results obtained are given more fully in Table 7 below.
TABLE 7______________________________________Lesion scores associated with infections of E. necatrix (H)E. necatrix (NA 36.sub.7) and E. necatrix (NA 29.sub.7 + 6) Numbers of chickens showing a lesionParasite and dose score of:-of oocysts given 0 1/2 1 11/2 2 21/2 3 31/2 4______________________________________E. necatrix (H) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 10(5 .times. 10.sup.4)E. necatrix (NA 36.sub.7) 10 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0(5 .times. 10.sup.4)E. necatrix (NA 36.sub.7) 10 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0(2 .times. 10.sup.5)E. necatrix (NA 29.sub.7 + 6) 0 0 0 0 0 5 0 2 3(5 .times. 10.sup.4)______________________________________
Reproduction of E. necatrix (H), (NA 23.sub.7), (NA 29.sub.7), (NA 33.sub.7) and (NA 36.sub.7) in chickens
To compare the reproductive potential of the parasites, groups of 15 chickens (three sub-groups of 5) were given either 5.times.10.sup.3 oocysts of E. necatrix (H) or 25.times.10.sup.3 or 1.times.10.sup.5 oocysts of the egg-attenuated lines. Oocyst production was measured daily between 6 and 13 days after inoculation and the results obtained are given in Table 8 below.
TABLE 8______________________________________Reproduction of E. necatrix (H), (NA 23.sub.7), (NA 29.sub.7), (NA33.sub.7)and (NA 36.sub.7) in chickens Dose of Mean number of oocysts ooxysts given produced per birdParasite (.times. 10.sup.-3) (.times. 10.sup.-6)______________________________________E. necatrix (H).sup.+ 5 30.90 25.51 26.33 23.73E. necatrix (NA 23.sub.7) 25 1.29 100 1.69*E. necatrix (NA 29.sub.7) 25 1.34 100 3.30E. necatrix (NA 33.sub.7) 25 0.56 100 1.84E. necatrix (NA 36.sub.7) 25 0.04 100 0.87______________________________________ .sup.+ included for each experiment as an internal standard *2 birds died from coccidiosis
Very few oocysts were produced following inoculation with E. necatrix (NA 36.sub.7) even when the infective dose contained 1.times.10.sup.5 oocysts. The peak of oocyst production for E. necatrix (NA 36.sub.7) and E. necatrix (H) occurred between 6 and 8 and 10 days after inoculation, respectively.
Immunogenicity of E. necatrix (NA 29.sub.7) in chickens maintained in litter pen isolators
In an experiment similar to that described previously for E. necatrix (NA 22.sub.7) the immunogenicity of E. necatrix (NA 29.sub.7) was determined. Six groups of 30, 3-weeks-old chickens kept in litter pen isolators were used. Two groups of chickens were given a primary infection of 5.times.10.sup.3 oocysts of E. necatrix (NA 29.sub.7), two groups a primary infection of 1.times.10.sup.2 oocysts of E. necatrix (H) and the remaining two groups were left uninfected. Subsequently all groups were challenged with a dose of 5.times.10.sup.4 oocysts per chicken of E. necatrix (H). The body weights of all chickens were measured at the times of primary infection (day 0), at challenge (day 41) and 7 days after challenge (day 48); all chickens being killed at this latter time and their lesions graded. During the period of immunisation, litter in the isolators was sprayed with water 11 times between 8 and 24 days after primary infection to provide conditions favourable for the recycling of parasites. The results which were obtained are given below in Table 9 showing that the dose of 5.times.10.sup.3 oocysts provides adequate protection against subsequent challenge with the parent pathogenic strain. Two of the chickens given a primary infection of E. necatrix (H) died as a result of acute coccidiosis between 17 and 19 days after inoculation, but there were no deaths associated with primary infection with E. necatrix (NA 29.sub.7).
Chickens given primary infections of E. necatrix (H) were completely immune to subsequent challenge as judged by body weight gain and lesion score. Some lesions were observed in chickens given E. necatrix (NA 29.sub.7) primary infection, but changes in body weight gain were not significantly different from those of the control group. In contrast, unimmunised birds had severe lesions as a result of challenge (two birds died) and the weight gain was significantly depressed (P<0.001) compared with the control group.
TABLE 9__________________________________________________________________________Body weight changes of chickens given E. necatrix (H) and (NA29)and maintained in litter pen isolators Parasite and dose of Initial Challenged with Mean intestinalGroup oocysts given for body weight Weight gain (g) 5 .times. 10.sup.4 oocysts Weight gain (g) lesion score 7 daysNo. immunisation.psi. (g) day 0 day 0 to day 42 of E. necatrix (H) day 42 to day after__________________________________________________________________________ challenge1 E. necatrix (NA29) 5 .times. 10.sup.3 161.1 772.3 YES 144.1 0.42 E. necatrix (NA29) 5 .times. 10.sup.3 161.1 767.2 NO 175.63 E. necatrix (H) 1 .times. 10.sup.2 161.3 694.1+ YES 163.4 0.04. E. necatrix (H) 1 .times. 10.sup.2 161.7 680.6 NO 165.05. None 161.4 751.9 YES 6.4*** 2.6 (two birds died)6. None 161.1 678.8.phi. NO 140.1__________________________________________________________________________ +Two birds in this group died from infection with E. necatrix .phi.A`leak` occurred in this isolator and large numbers of oocysts of E. acervulina were seen during the regular monitoring of litter up to day 42 .psi.Litter sprayed with water 11 times during period of immunisation. ***Significantly different from groups 1, 2, 3, 4 and 6 (P<0.001)
EXAMPLE 3
An attenuated line of E. acervulina has also been developed by selection for precocious development of coccidia grown in chickens. This precocious, "attenuated" line hereinafter referred to as the (HP) line of E. acervulina may be incorporated with egg attenuated E. necatrix (NA), as described in previous examples, into vaccines for combatting and controlling chicken coccidiosis of poultry, according to a preferred embodiment of the invention.
Development of the precocious, "attenuated" strain E. acervulina (HP)
In a preliminary experiment the prepatent period of the parent pathogenic Houghton (H) strain of E. acervulina was found to be 89 h as determined by salt flotations of faecal samples taken at intervals of one hour.
In order to develop a precocious line, therefore, oocysts were initially recovered 96 h post infection (PI), and thereafter the first oocysts produced were inoculated into further chickens (LS) and within 2 passages the prepatent period had been reduced to 83 h. Some difficulty was experienced at the 4th passage in collecting sufficient oocysts at 83 h but, subsequently, it proved possible to reduce the time required to collect workable numbers of oocysts to 72 h. At this latter stage it was necessary to relax the selection pressure for precocious development after 2 unsuccessful attempts to reduce further the collection time, and oocysts were collected after 90 h. The earlist time after infection at which it was possible to collect oocysts was 70 h, at the 14th passage.
Parallel chicken passages of the parent pathogenic strain were carried out, oocysts being collected 120 h PI. The prepatent period after 15 passages of the parent (H) strain was found to be 89 h.
Characteristics of the precocious line
1. Reproduction
The reproduction of the HP line was examined after the 12th passage (10 passages followed by 2 passages of relaxed selection pressure). Four groups of 3-weeks-old LS chickens were inoculated with doses of 1.times.10.sup.2 or 1.times.10.sup.4 oocysts per bird of either E. acervulina (H), or E. acervulina (HP), and the oocyst production of each group during the period from 3 to 9 days after inoculation was determined. The results obtained are given below in Table 10.
TABLE 10______________________________________The total mean oocyst output over 9 days per LS chickengiven either 1 .times. 10.sup.2 or 1 .times. 10.sup.4 oocystsof E. acervulina (H) or (HP)Strain and dose of Mean oocyst outputoocysts given per bird (.times. 10.sup.-6)______________________________________(H) 1 .times. 10.sup.2 11.9(H) 1 .times. 10.sup.4 299.5(HP) 1 .times. 10.sup.2 1.7(HP) 1 .times. 10.sup.4 119.0______________________________________
Up to the ninth day after infection the parent (H) strain produced numbers of oocysts which were greater than those produced by the precocious line by factors of 6.9 and 2.5 for inoculations of 1.times.10.sup.2 and 1.times.10.sup.4 oocysts respectively.
2. Histology
Endogenous stages of (HP) line and the (H) strain were studied in stained sections of intestine. It was found that development of the endogenous strains of the two parasites was identical up to 60 h PI. At 66 h PI, however, gametocytes were found in the (HP) line infection, but did not appear in the parent (H) strain infection until 80 h. A few mature 4th generation schizonts were seen in infections with both parasites at 66 h but subsequently were abundant only in association with the (H) strain. It appears, therefore, that gametocytes of the (HP) line develop mainly from 3rd generation schizonts with a small number developing later from 4th generation schizonts.
Pathogenicity and Immunogenicity
1. Pathogenicity
As in previous examples for E. necatrix, the pathogenicity of E. acervulina (H) and (HP) was measured by comparing the weight gains of uninfected and infected birds. Birds were weighed individually each day from the day before infection until the 14th day after infection and the mean weight gains were calculated. E. acervulina (HP) oocysts used in this experiment were obtained after the 13th passage (10 passages followed by 3 passages of relaxed selection pressure). Five groups of 3-weeks-old weight-matched LS chickens (each group divided into 3 sub-groups of 7) were used; four groups being given 1.times.10.sup.5 or 1.times.10.sup.6 oocysts per chicken of either the (H) strain or the (HP) line; and the remaining group being kept as an uninfected control group. The results obtained are given diagrammatically in FIG. 3 showing that the weight losses of birds infected with E. acervulina (HP) were significantly (P<0.001) less than for the (H) strain infected birds. Birds given 1.times.10.sup.5 oocysts of the (HP) line showed no mean weight loss while birds given the same dose of the (H) strain lost weight on day 5 after challenge. The higher dose (10.sup.6 oocysts) of the (H) strain and (HP) line both produced weight loss, though chickens given the (HP) line recovered significantly faster. Four chickens (19%) given the higher dose of the (H) strain died, whilst no birds given the oocysts of the (HP) line died.
2. Immunogenicity
Oocysts of the (HP) line from the 12th passage (10 passages followed by 2 passages of relaxed selection pressure) were used for this experiment. Four groups of 3-weeks-old LS birds (each group made up of 3 subgroups of 4 birds) were given 1.times.10.sup.5 oocysts per bird of the (H) strain or (HP) line and challenged 14 days later with 1.times.10.sup.3 oocysts per bird of either parasite. At the time of challenge 2 control groups were also given 1.times.10.sup.3 oocysts of either parasite. The results obtained are given below in Table 11, indicating that chickens given a primary infection of the (HP) line were almost completely immune to challenge with the (H) strain as judged by their oocyst output. These birds were also strongly immune to subsequent challenge with the (HP) line. These results indicate that, despite a reduction in the reproductive capacity of the (HP) line, it is still characterised by stages which contain the antigens responsible for protective immunity.
TABLE 11______________________________________Cross-immunity between the (H) strain and(HP) line of E.acervulina in LS chickensImmunising Challengeparasite parasite Oocysts/bird(1 .times. 10.sup.5 oocysts) (1 .times. 10.sup.3 oocysts) days 4-8 (.times. 10.sup.-6)______________________________________H H 0.06HP HP 0.1HP H 6.65-- H 352.9-- HP 56.8______________________________________
Attenuated, precocious lines of E. acervulina (HP), such as those described above may be incorporated with the egg-attenuated lines of E. necatrix (NA) of the invention in vaccines for prevention and control of coccidiosis in chickens.

Number	Name	Date
3029282	Toy et al.	Apr 1962
3864394	Via et al.	Feb 1975
4241021	Skrzec	Dec 1980

Coccidiosis vaccines

Information

Patent Number

Date Filed

Date Issued

Inventors

Original Assignees

Examiners

Agents

CPC

US Classifications

Field of Search

US

International Classifications

Abstract

Description

Claims

Priority Claims (1)

US Referenced Citations (3)

Non-Patent Literature Citations (4)

Entry
T. A. Shibalova, vol. IX, pp. 299-303, (1972), "Acta Protozoologica".
P. L. Long, "The Growth of Eimeria in Cultured Cells and in Chicken Embryos" Symp. Proceedings, Ontario, (1974).
D. J. Doran, Journ. of Parasitology, vol. 57, No. 5, Oct. 1971, "Survival and Development of Five Species of Chicken Coccidia in Primary Chicken Kidney Cell Cultures".
P. L. Long, Parasitology, 56, pp. 575-581, (1966), "The Growth of Some Species of Eimeria in Avian Embryos".