Hearing loss can be corrected using a number of approaches, including surgically placing a cochlear implant which includes an electrode array that is inserted into the cochlea of a patient. The electrode array presents electrical stimulation directly to auditory nerve fibers in the cochlea. This leads to the perception of sound in the brain and provides at least partial restoration of hearing function. Occasionally, the cochlear implant may need to be replaced with a new cochlear implant. The original electrode array is removed from the cochlea and a new cochlear lead is inserted. In some instances, the cochlea may have tissue that at least partially occludes the passageway into which the new cochlear lead is to be inserted. This presents a number of challenges that can be addressed by a new cochlear lead design.
The accompanying drawings illustrate various embodiments of the principles described herein and are a part of the specification. The illustrated embodiments are merely examples and do not limit the scope of the claims.
Throughout the drawings, identical reference numbers designate similar, but not necessarily identical, elements.
In human hearing, hair cells in the cochlea respond to sound waves and produce corresponding auditory nerve impulses. These nerve impulses are then conducted to the brain and perceived as sound.
Hearing loss, which may be due to many different causes, is generally of two types: conductive and sensorineural. Conductive hearing loss typically occurs where the normal mechanical pathways for sound to reach the hair cells in the cochlea are impeded, for example, from damage to the ossicles. Conductive hearing loss may often be helped by using conventional hearing aids that amplify sounds so that acoustic information can reach the cochlea and the hair cells. Some types of conductive hearing loss are also treatable by surgical procedures.
Many people who are profoundly deaf, however, have sensorineural hearing loss. This type of hearing loss can arise from the absence or the destruction of the hair cells in the cochlea which then no longer transduce acoustic signals into auditory nerve impulses. Individuals with sensorineural hearing loss may be unable to derive significant benefit from conventional hearing aid systems alone, no matter how loud the acoustic stimulus is. This is because the mechanism for transducing sound energy into auditory nerve impulses has been damaged. Thus, in the absence of properly functioning hair cells, auditory nerve impulses cannot be generated directly from sounds.
To overcome sensorineural deafness, cochlear implant systems, or cochlear prostheses, have been developed that can bypass the hair cells located in the cochlea by presenting electrical stimulation directly to the auditory nerve fibers. This leads to the perception of sound in the brain and provides at least partial restoration of hearing function. Most of these cochlear prosthesis systems treat sensorineural deficit by stimulating the ganglion cells in the cochlea directly using an implanted lead that has an electrode array. Thus, a cochlear prosthesis operates by directly stimulating the auditory nerve cells, bypassing the defective cochlear hair cells that normally transduce acoustic energy into electrical activity to the connected auditory nerve cells.
A cochlear implant system typically comprises both an external unit that receives and processes ambient sound waves and an implanted processor/cochlear lead that receives data from the external unit and uses that data to directly stimulate the auditory nerve. The cochlear lead includes an electrode array that is implanted within one of the cochlear ducts, such as the scala tympani. To minimize damage to sensitive tissues within the patient's cochlea, it can be desirable for the electrode array to be accurately placed within the cochlea using a minimum amount of insertion force. The cochlear implant should be designed so that the insertion forces do not kink or otherwise damage the delicate wires and electrodes contained within the implant.
According to one illustrative embodiment, the electrode array can be constructed from biocompatible silicone, platinum-iridium wires, and platinum electrodes. The portion of the lead to be inserted into the cochlea is designed to be relatively flexible so that it can curve around the helical interior of the cochlea.
This specification describes a stiffening element that provides a desired level of rigidity to the electrode array for improved control by the surgeon and prevents kinking along the length of the cochlear lead during insertion. In some embodiments, the stiffening element extends past the most distal electrode to the tip of the electrode array. This stiffening element can be particularly suited for revision surgeries. The stiffening element is more rigid than the body of the cochlear lead and can be fully encapsulated within the lead to reduce the risk of infection and better stabilize it within the lead. According to one illustrative embodiment, this stiffening element serves at least four purposes. First, the stiffening element provides additional rigidity along the length of the cochlear lead, thereby reducing the likelihood that the insertion forces will kink the lead. Second, the stiffening element provides the surgeon with greater control over the placement of the lead within the cochlea. Third, the stiffening element redirects the insertion force into a tangential force, which allows the cochlear lead to be inserted deeper into the cochlea with less applied force. Fourth, at least a portion of the stiffening element may be formed from a material that plastically deforms during insertion, which allows the stiffening element to conform to the shape of the cochlea and provides the ability to overcome obstructive tissue and provide full insertion of the electrode array.
Revision surgery can be used to explant a cochlear electrode array from the cochlea and replace it with a new electrode array. During revision surgery it is sometimes difficult to insert a compliant pre-curved or lateral electrode array due to the presence of scar tissue/ossification that has formed around the previous electrode array. For a partially ossified cochlea or for a cochlea with fibrous tissue growth, a stiffer electrode can be used to ensure insertion to the full depth of the electrode. In one example, a cochlear lead includes an integral stiffener with suitable malleability. The integral stiffener extends along the complete length of the electrode array and conforms to the shape of the cochlea.
In the following description, for purposes of explanation, numerous specific details are set forth in order to provide a thorough understanding of the present systems and methods. It will be apparent, however, to one skilled in the art that the present systems and methods may be practiced without these specific details. Reference in the specification to “an embodiment,” “an example,” or similar language means that a particular feature, structure, or characteristic described in connection with the embodiment or example is included in at least that one embodiment, but not necessarily in other embodiments. The various instances of the phrase “in one embodiment” or similar phrases in various places in the specification are not necessarily all referring to the same embodiment.
As indicated above, the cochlear implant (300) is a surgically implanted electronic device that provides a sense of sound to a person who is profoundly deaf or severely hard of hearing. In many cases, deafness is caused by the absence or destruction of the hair cells in the cochlea, i.e., sensorineural hearing loss. In the absence of properly functioning hair cells, there is no way auditory nerve impulses can be directly generated from ambient sound. Thus, conventional hearing aids, which amplify external sound waves, provide no benefit to persons suffering from complete sensorineural hearing loss.
Unlike hearing aids, the cochlear implant (300) does not amplify sound, but works by directly stimulating any functioning auditory nerve cells inside the cochlea (150) with electrical impulses representing the ambient acoustic sound. Cochlear prosthesis typically involves the implantation of electrodes into the cochlea. The cochlear implant operates by direct electrical stimulation of the auditory nerve cells, bypassing the defective cochlear hair cells that normally transduce acoustic energy into electrical energy.
External components (200) of the cochlear implant system can include a Behind-The-Ear (BTE) unit (175), which contains the sound processor and has a microphone (170), a cable (177), and a transmitter (180). The microphone (170) picks up sound from the environment and converts it into electrical impulses. The sound processor within the BTE unit (175) selectively filters and manipulates the electrical impulses and sends the processed electrical signals through the cable (177) to the transmitter (180). The transmitter (180) receives the processed electrical signals from the processor and transmits them to the implanted antenna (187) by electromagnetic transmission. In some cochlear implant systems, the transmitter (180) is held in place by magnetic interaction with a magnet (189) in the underlying antenna (187).
The components of the cochlear implant (300) include an internal processor (185), an antenna (187), and a cochlear lead (190) having an electrode array (195). The internal processor (185) and antenna (187) are secured beneath the user's skin, typically above and behind the pinna (110). The antenna (187) receives signals and power from the transmitter (180). The internal processor (185) receives these signals and performs one or more operations on the signals to generate modified signals. These modified signals are then sent through the cochlear lead (190) to the electrode array (195), which is the portion of the cochlear lead (190) that is implanted within the cochlea (150) and provides electrical stimulation to the auditory nerve (160).
The cochlear implant (300) stimulates different portions of the cochlea (150) according to the frequencies detected by the microphone (170), just as a normal functioning ear would experience stimulation at different portions of the cochlea depending on the frequency of sound vibrating the liquid within the cochlea (150). This allows the brain to interpret the frequency of the sound as if the hair cells of the basilar membrane were functioning properly.
The cochlear lead typically comprises an electrode array that is implanted in the scala tympani. The electrode array typically includes several separately connected stimulating electrode contacts, conventionally numbering about 6 to 30, longitudinally disposed on a thin, elongated, flexible carrier. The electrode array is pushed into the scala tympani duct in the cochlea, typically to a depth of about 13 to 30 mm via a cochleostomy or via a surgical opening made in the round window at the basal end of the duct.
In use, the cochlear electrode array delivers electrical current into the fluids and tissues immediately surrounding the individual electrode contacts to create transient potential gradients that, if sufficiently strong, cause the nearby auditory nerve fibers to generate action potentials. The auditory nerve fibers branch from cell bodies located in the spiral ganglion, which lies in the modiolus, adjacent to the inside wall of the scala tympani. The density of electrical current flowing through volume conductors such as tissues and fluids tends to be highest near the electrode contact that is the source of such current. Consequently, stimulation at one contact site tends to selectively activate those spiral ganglion cells and their auditory nerve fibers that are closest to that contact site.
Throughout the specification and appended claims the term “distal” refers to portions that are closer to the tip (440) of the cochlear lead (190) and “proximal” refers to portions that are farther away from the tip (440). The terms “medial” and “lateral” refer to locations that are closer to the center of the cochlea and closer to the outer portions of the cochlea, respectively. For example, the phrase medial wall of the cochlea refers to portions of a cochlear duct that are toward the center of the cochlea.
In the example shown in
The illustrative cochlear lead (190) is specifically designed to provide the surgeon with the desired control and prevent the electrode array from kinking or folding along its length. The cochlear lead (190) includes a lead body (445). The lead body (445) connects the electrode array (195) to the internal processor (185,
The wires (455) that conduct the electrical signals generated by the processor are connected to the electrodes (465) within the electrode array (195). For example, electrical signals which correspond to a low frequency sound may be communicated via a first wire to an electrode near the tip (440) of the electrode array (195). Electrical signals which correspond to a high frequency sound may be communicated by a second wire to an electrode (465) near the proximal end of the electrode array (195). According to one illustrative embodiment, there may be one wire (455) for each electrode (465) within the electrode array (195). The internal processor (185,
According to one illustrative embodiment, the wires (455) and portions of the electrodes (465) are encased in a flexible body (475). The flexible body (475) may be formed from a variety of biocompatible materials, including, but not limited to, medical grade silicone rubber. The flexible body (475) secures and protects the wires (455) and electrodes (465). The flexible body (475) allows the electrode array (195) to bend and conform to the geometry of the cochlea. When placed within the cochlea (150), the electrode array (195) brings the individual electrodes into dose proximity with the tonotopically organized nerves in the cochlea (150).
Additionally, as can be seen in
In some embodiments, the fit of the sheath (540) over the stiffening element may vary from location to location. For example, the sheath (540) may be formed so that it fits relatively loosely over the stiffening element (500) near its proximal and distal ends, but have a tighter fit in the center of the stiffening element. Additionally, the sheath (540) may cover the entire stiffening element (500) or only a portion of the stiffening element (500). For example, the sheath (540) may cover only the distal portion (515) of the stiffening element. Although the sheath (540) is shown with an open end and a closed end, the sheath may have both ends open or both ends closed.
The stiffening element (500) may be located within the flexible body (475) and extend from at or near the molded feature (450) to a location within the electrode array (195). According to one embodiment, the stiffening element (500) comprises or consists essentially of platinum. In other embodiments, it may be made of any material which provides the desired mechanical and chemical properties. These properties may include low yield strength and chemical inertness. By way of example and not limitation, the stiffening element (500) may be a plastic, metal, glass, composite, or other material. According to one illustrative embodiment, the stiffening element (500) may comprise or consist of gold or a gold alloy.
According to one embodiment, stiffening element (500) extends approximately 2 mm to 6 mm from the cochleostomy. For example, the stiffening element may extend into the cochlea approximately 15 mm to 30 mm from the cochleostomy. In this illustrative embodiment, the stiffening element (500) extends from the molded rubber gripping feature (450) through the electrode array past the most distal electrode. The gripping feature (450) can be grasped by general or specialized surgical tools. The extension of the stiffening element into the gripping feature (450) allows these tools to grip the stiffening element through the encapsulation with minimal risk of damage to other components in the cochlear lead. The stiffening element can then be manipulated using the surgical tools to guide the cochlear lead into the desired position within the cochlea.
The stiffness and ductility of the stiffening element (500) can be selected to significantly influence the amount of force required to insert the electrode array (195) into the cochlea. Alternatively or additionally, the geometry of the stiffening element can be altered along its length to create the desired mechanical properties. For example, the distal portion of the stiffener may have a variety of cross sectional geometries, including flattened, elliptical or circular. The cross sections may vary along the length of the stiffener. These cross sections can be selected to produce the desired stiffness, with lower stiffnesses typically desired near the distal end of the stiffener. The different cross sections may be formed in a variety of ways, including grinding, rolling, pressing, drawing, or other suitable technique. In some embodiments, the distal portion of the stiffener may have a number of micro-machined features that produce desired bending characteristics.
A variety of other techniques, such as work hardening, could be used to modify the yield strength, malleability, ductility, stiffness, or other characteristics of the stiffener (700). According to one example, the distal portion (710) of the stiffener (700) is annealed and the tip portion (705) is annealed so that the metal is “dead soft.” The term “dead soft” refers to the condition of maximum softness that is attainable in a metal or metal alloy through annealing. In other embodiments, the distal portion may be annealed but not to the extent that the metal is dead soft.
The annealing may be performed in a stepwise fashion, the entire tip portion (705) having a substantially uniform dead soft anneal and the remainder of the distal portion (710) being annealed to a lesser extent. The temper of the remainder of the stiffener (700) may remain in an “as drawn” state or may be heat treated to alter characteristics of the metal. In one embodiment, portions of the electrode that will be bent to follow the spiral of the cochlea are annealed and portions that remain in the relatively straight basal portion of the cochlea are more rigid. In alternative embodiments, the annealing may vary continuously along the length of the stiffener (700). According to one embodiment, the stiffener may be annealed from the distal tip up to approximately its midpoint.
The sheath (715) is formed by cutting it to length. In this example, the distal end (725) is closed while the proximal end (720) of the sheath is open. The sheath (715) is cut slightly longer than the stiffener. As discussed above, the sheath (715) may be sized to allow for motion of the stiffener (700) within it.
The sheath is only one illustrative example. In other examples, the stiffener (515) may be overcoated with a thin layer. This thin layer may be formed from a number of materials and applied in a variety of ways. In other embodiments, the flexible body may include a lumen may be lined with polytetrafluoroethylene (PTFE) or other friction reducing material. The stiffener can then be inserted into the lumen. In most cases, the stiffener can move relative to the flexible body (475,
The sheath is then formed. As discussed above, the sheath may be a polymer tube that is selected to allow the stiffener to slide freely within its inner diameter. Additionally, the polymer material may be selected for its lubricity and biocompatibility. One end of the tube is closed, with the other end remaining open to receive the stiffener.
In some embodiments an additional cap is placed over the distal end of the sheath. The cap may be a flat plate or semi spherical shape that prevents puncture of the stiffening element through the flexible body. The cap may be used alone or in conjunction with the sheath. In other embodiment, the sheath is fused together to form a ball or caplike structure.
The stiffener is inserted into the sheath (step 810) and the ends of the sheath are closed (step 815). The sheath and the stiffener make up the stiffening element. The stiffening element is then encapsulated in the flexible body (step 820) with the electrodes and wires. A variety of techniques can be used to encapsulate the stiffening element in the flexible body. Illustrative examples of these techniques are described in U.S. application Ser. No. 12/789,264, filed May 27, 2010, entitled “Cochlear Lead” to Chuladatta Thenuwara et al., which was incorporated by reference above.
A variety of other steps can be taken to complete the manufacture of the cochlear lead. For example, these steps may include testing, sterilization, and packaging.
The surgeon attaches the appropriate tool to the cochlear lead by gripping a proximal end of the stiffening element contained within the gripping feature (step 915). This tool may be a special purpose tool that is specifically adapted for insertion of the cochlear lead or may be a more general purpose surgical tool such as tweezers or forceps. In some cases, the surgeon may manually bend the distal portion of the cochlear lead to achieve the desired curvature. Because the distal portion of the cochlear lead is annealed, the cochlear lead will tend to maintain the curvature created by the surgeon. In other examples, the surgeon may leave the cochlear lead in its substantially straight configuration.
The surgeon then inserts the electrode array into the patient's cochlea by manipulating the proximal end of the stiffening element to guide the cochlear lead into the cavity vacated by the previous cochlear lead (step 920). The full length stiffening element provides the surgeon with increased control throughout the insertion process and allows slightly higher forces to be used without kinking or folding over the electrode array. The surgeon can use the increased control and resistance to kinking provided by the stiffening element to maneuver the cochlear lead past obstructions to a predetermined depth in the cochlea.
The preceding description has been presented only to illustrate and describe embodiments and examples of the principles described. This description is not intended to be exhaustive or to limit these principles to any precise form disclosed. Many modifications and variations are possible in light of the above teaching.
The present application is a continuation-in-part, and claims the benefit under 35 U.S.C. §120, of U.S. application Ser. No. 12/789,264, filed May 27, 2010, entitled “Cochlear Lead” to Chuladatta Thenuwara et al. This application is incorporated herein by reference in its entirety.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
5437632 | Engelson | Aug 1995 | A |
5470322 | Horzewski et al. | Nov 1995 | A |
5476497 | Mower et al. | Dec 1995 | A |
5573520 | Schwartz et al. | Nov 1996 | A |
5630839 | Corbett et al. | May 1997 | A |
5653742 | Parker et al. | Aug 1997 | A |
5762630 | Bley et al. | Jun 1998 | A |
5800500 | Spelman et al. | Sep 1998 | A |
5999859 | Jolly | Dec 1999 | A |
6048338 | Larson et al. | Apr 2000 | A |
6119044 | Kuzma et al. | Sep 2000 | A |
6125302 | Kuzma | Sep 2000 | A |
6321125 | Kuzma | Nov 2001 | B1 |
6368316 | Jansen et al. | Apr 2002 | B1 |
6421569 | Treaba et al. | Jul 2002 | B1 |
6428489 | Jacobsen et al. | Aug 2002 | B1 |
6475209 | Larson et al. | Nov 2002 | B1 |
6556873 | Smits | Apr 2003 | B1 |
6562021 | Derbin et al. | May 2003 | B1 |
6604283 | Kuzma | Aug 2003 | B1 |
6757970 | Kuzma et al. | Jul 2004 | B1 |
6858680 | Gunatillake et al. | Feb 2005 | B2 |
6887235 | O'Connor et al. | May 2005 | B2 |
6968238 | Kuzma | Nov 2005 | B1 |
6999821 | Jenney et al. | Feb 2006 | B2 |
7047081 | Kuzma | May 2006 | B2 |
7050858 | Kuzma et al. | May 2006 | B1 |
7063708 | Gibson et al. | Jun 2006 | B2 |
7066931 | O'Connor et al. | Jun 2006 | B2 |
7115183 | Larson et al. | Oct 2006 | B2 |
7146227 | Dadd et al. | Dec 2006 | B2 |
7239923 | Tockman et al. | Jul 2007 | B1 |
7269461 | Dadd et al. | Sep 2007 | B2 |
7272449 | Dadd et al. | Sep 2007 | B2 |
7315763 | Kuzma et al. | Jan 2008 | B2 |
7319906 | Kuzma et al. | Jan 2008 | B2 |
7328072 | Milojevic et al. | Feb 2008 | B2 |
7389148 | Morgan | Jun 2008 | B1 |
7403823 | Kroll et al. | Jul 2008 | B1 |
7451000 | Gibson et al. | Nov 2008 | B2 |
7540865 | Griffin et al. | Jun 2009 | B2 |
7571012 | Gibson | Aug 2009 | B2 |
7742827 | Lenarz et al. | Jun 2010 | B2 |
20020029074 | Treaba et al. | Mar 2002 | A1 |
20020161114 | Gunatillake et al. | Oct 2002 | A1 |
20030040684 | Soukup | Feb 2003 | A1 |
20030045921 | Dadd et al. | Mar 2003 | A1 |
20030093139 | Gibson et al. | May 2003 | A1 |
20030181967 | Dadd et al. | Sep 2003 | A1 |
20040030376 | Gibson et al. | Feb 2004 | A1 |
20040078057 | Gibson | Apr 2004 | A1 |
20040127968 | Kuzma et al. | Jul 2004 | A1 |
20050234535 | Risi et al. | Oct 2005 | A1 |
20060089569 | Soukup et al. | Apr 2006 | A1 |
20060235500 | Gibson et al. | Oct 2006 | A1 |
20060247749 | Colvin | Nov 2006 | A1 |
20070073130 | Finch et al. | Mar 2007 | A1 |
20070073371 | Dadd et al. | Mar 2007 | A1 |
20070127745 | Gibson | Jun 2007 | A1 |
20070162098 | Risi et al. | Jul 2007 | A1 |
20080027527 | Kuzma et al. | Jan 2008 | A1 |
20080077049 | Hirshman | Mar 2008 | A1 |
20080109011 | Thenuwara et al. | May 2008 | A1 |
20080269864 | Dadd et al. | Oct 2008 | A1 |
20090030483 | Risi et al. | Jan 2009 | A1 |
20090043358 | Dadd et al. | Feb 2009 | A1 |
20090043369 | Radeloff | Feb 2009 | A1 |
20090043370 | Gibson et al. | Feb 2009 | A1 |
20090165921 | Kaiser | Jul 2009 | A1 |
20090312769 | Dadd et al. | Dec 2009 | A1 |
20100057180 | Gibson et al. | Mar 2010 | A1 |
20100106232 | Dadd et al. | Apr 2010 | A1 |
20100204768 | Jolly et al. | Aug 2010 | A1 |
20100287770 | Dadd et al. | Nov 2010 | A1 |
20110016710 | Dadd | Jan 2011 | A1 |
20110319907 | Gallegos et al. | Dec 2011 | A1 |
20120035615 | Koester et al. | Feb 2012 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
1341578 | Apr 2002 | EP |
2209520 | Jul 2003 | EP |
1604626 | Dec 2005 | EP |
1604626 | Dec 2005 | EP |
1189560 | Mar 2006 | EP |
1604626 | Dec 2008 | EP |
2042137 | Apr 2009 | EP |
9306698 | Apr 1993 | WO |
9710784 | Mar 1997 | WO |
0071063 | Nov 2000 | WO |
0228473 | Apr 2002 | WO |
0228474 | Apr 2002 | WO |
0230507 | Apr 2002 | WO |
0232498 | Apr 2002 | WO |
0243623 | Jun 2002 | WO |
02094334 | Nov 2002 | WO |
03049658 | Jun 2003 | WO |
2004002570 | Jan 2004 | WO |
2007002879 | Mar 2007 | WO |
2007027879 | Mar 2007 | WO |
2009065127 | May 2009 | WO |
2009065171 | May 2009 | WO |
2009079704 | Jul 2009 | WO |
2010015016 | Feb 2010 | WO |
2010015017 | Feb 2010 | WO |
2010091237 | Aug 2010 | WO |
2010091237 | Nov 2010 | WO |
2011149695 | Dec 2011 | WO |
Entry |
---|
Rebscher et al, Strategies to Improve Electrode Positioning and Safety in Cochlear Implants, IEEE Trans Biomed Eng, 46(3) 340-352, 1999. |
Kha et al, Stiffness Properties of Nucleus Standard Straight and Contour Electrode Arrays, Med and Eng Phys 26 677-685, 2004. |
He, Bo et al., Surface Texture effect on Friction of a Microtextured Polydimethylsiloxane, Tribology Letters, vol. 31, No. 3, Aug. 12, 2008; pp. 1-11. |
Stover, Timo et al., “Microstructured Cochlear Implant Electrodes,” Subproject T1 of Collaborative Research Center 599; pp. 1-2; Feb. 7, 2011. |
Lenarz, Thomas et al., “Nerve-Electrode Interface,” Subproject D2 of Collaborative Research Center 599; pp. 1-2; Feb. 7, 2011. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20120221088 A1 | Aug 2012 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 12789264 | May 2010 | US |
Child | 13463450 | US |