The invention pertains to optical communication systems.
Optical fibers provide communication bandwidths as large as tens of Terahertz (THz). Such large bandwidths are too large to be fully used by single-channel communication systems that transmit data by amplitude modulation of a narrow-bandwidth optical carrier such as by directly modulating a distributed feedback laser. Factors limiting the bandwidth occupied by simple amplitude-modulated systems include bandwidth limits on available electronic and optical components such as optical modulators and detectors, as well as fiber dispersion.
In order to more fully use the available bandwidth of an optical fiber, multiplexing techniques have been developed that permit several communication channels to use the same optical fiber. The total fiber bandwidth used by these channels can be as large as the sum of the individual channel bandwidths. Conventional methods for multiplexing in optical communication systems include time-division multiplexing (TDM), wavelength-division multiplexing (WDM), and optical-code-division multiple access (OCDMA). These optical multiplexing methods are typically used in long haul, point-to-point communication and in short haul, ring-topology communication systems. Each of these methods has benefits as well as drawbacks associated with it.
A passive optical network (PON) capable of transmitting and receiving data from a large number of users simultaneously reduces cost and increases system reliability. A PON includes passive optical components that route optically encoded data streams to and from designated users or network nodes. Communication systems based on the Synchronous Optical Network (“SONET”) are not PONs since each user or node in a SONET system must have active equipment to detect and demultiplex the data stream to recover data, and then retransmit data to the next user or node.
WDM systems are PONs, but each user of a WDM system is assigned a specific wavelength, so that WDM-based PONs are expensive and are not readily reconfigurable.
The use of OCDMA in a PON is advantageous in that data encoded onto a single transmitter can be distributed among many users because data is distinguished by a complex temporal code, and not wavelength as in WDM systems. Furthermore, CDMA coding has the advantage that the number of users is flexible, dependent on system usage. Also, most OCDMA implementations inherently offer hardware encryption by making channel decoding difficult without knowledge of the OCDMA encoding scheme. However, flexible tree-architecture PONs based on OCDMA typically require expensive equipment that must be located at each network node or an end-user location. Therefore, improved systems, methods, and architectures are needed for practical PON OCDMA systems.
In the communication system 100, multiple data streams are multiplexed and demultiplexed by using optical-code-division multiple access (OCDMA). As shown in
A central station address encoder 205 receives the optical data signal from the optical transmitter 203 and encodes the modulated optical signal with an optical code such as a composite code serving as an address for a selected user. In an alternative embodiment, the central station address encoder 205 can include encoders for every user (a total of nxm encoders), or a smaller number of programmable encoders depending on system requirements, e.g., the aggregate downstream bandwidth and the number of users to be simultaneously addressed.
Composite codes are described in a U.S. patent application entitled CODES, METHODS, AND APPARATUS FOR OPTICAL ENCODING AND DECODING, co-filed with the present application and incorporated herein by reference. Representative encoders and decoders using fiber Bragg gratings are described in U.S. patent application Ser. No. 09/354,851, TIME-WAVELENGTH MULTIPLE ACCESS COMMUNICATION SYSTEM that is incorporated herein by reference.
The composite codes are made of one or more code sets, each code set corresponding to the number of mux levels. In the two-node (two mux levels) network of
Returning further to
The central station 103 further comprises an input module 209 that receives optical signals from the level-A mux station 111 and delivers optical signals to a central station address decoder 211 that decodes the level A and level B codes with which the optical signals are encoded. After the optical signals are thus decoded, an optical receiver 213 produces an uncoded electrical signal corresponding to the decoded optical signal, and an optical transmitter (“output data module”) 215 transmits a corresponding optical signal on the communication link 121.
The level-A mux station 111 also includes input modules (“input means”) 3071, . . . , 307n that receive optical data signals from respective level-B mux stations 1131, . . . , 113n. A level-A address encoder 309 applies a level-A code to the received optical signals and directs the encoded optical signals to an output module (“output means”) 311 for delivery to the central station 103.
The user stations 117il, . . . , 117nm include respective interface modules, such as a representative interface module 901ij shown in
For communication in an upstream direction, i.e., from a user station 117ij towards the central station 103, an input module 913ij receives data from a user input 915ij. The received data modulates an optical transmitter (“modulated optical source”) 917ij and the output module 903ij transmits an uncoded optical signal to a level-B mux. The optical transmitter 917ij can include a laser diode that is directly modulated by the received data, or that is modulated by an electro-optic, acousto-optic, electro-absorptive, or other modulator. Corresponding level-A and level-B mux stations apply level-A and level-B codes to the uncoded optical signal, and the coded signal arrives at the central station 103 where it can be decoded for transmission by stripping the level-A and level-B codes that indicate the data source.
Returning to
The embodiments described herein comprise encoders and decoders that include optical circulators and reflective complex fiber Bragg gratings. Other coding methods and apparatus can be used. Such methods and apparatus also apply selected linear spectral transforms to optical signals. Furthermore, other methods and apparatus, such as beam splitters or fiber couplers, can be used to separate counterpropagating optical data signals instead of optical circulators. Representative optical encoders and decoders include passive diffractive devices such as Bragg gratings and fiber Bragg gratings as described in, for example, U.S. Pat. No. 5,812,318; U.S. patent application Ser. No. 09/115,331, SEGMENTED TASM GRATINGS, Ser. No. 09/120,959, SEGMENTED COMPLEX FIBER GRATING, and Ser. No. 09/354,851, TIME WAVELENGTH MULTIPLE ACCESS COMMUNICATION SYSTEM. These documents are incorporated herein by reference.
The communication system 100 of
For convenience in describing embodiments, decoders were referred to as “stripping” a code from a signal. Decoding generally permits data recovery by a detector, and decoding need not restore a signal exactly to its pre-encoded form. In addition, a signal from which a code has been stripped can be referred to as a “decoded” signal. Finally, for clarity, encoders and decoders are referred to in the above description, but can be more generally referred to as “coders.”
For convenience, composite codes that include two code levels and suitable for use in a passive optical network and in address encoders/decoders are described with reference to
A supercode encoder 1007 receives the data signal 1003 and applies a predetermined code Ri selected from a code set R to the data signal 1003. For purposes of illustration, a code Ri={1, −1, 1} is selected and applied to a representative bit 1009 of the data signal 1003. As specified by the code R, the encoder 1007 receives the bit 1009 and transforms the bit into a “supercoded” bit packet 1011. The supercoded bit packet 1011 includes super-coded bits (“superbits”) 1013–1015 that are relatively delayed by a delay time TRC, wherein TRC is a supercode chip duration. In addition, the phase of the superbit 1014 is inverted, while the phases of the superbits 1013, 1015 are unchanged. The encoder 1007 applies the code Ri to the entire data signal 1003 to produce a supercoded data signal that is a sum of superbits corresponding to all respective bits of the data signal 1003.
A subcode encoder 1017 receives the supercoded data signal and applies a code Si selected from a code set S. For purposes of illustration, a code Si={−1, 1, −1} is selected. The code Si is applied to the supercoded bit packet 1011 to produce a combined subcoded and supercoded (“composite-coded”) bit packet 1021 that includes subcoded bits 1023, 1025, 1027, corresponding to respective superbits 1013, 1014, 1015. The encoder 1017 encodes each of the supercoded bits 1013–1015 by relatively delaying portions by a delay time TSC wherein TSC is a subcode chip duration, and changing the phase of the supercoded bits 1013, 1015, to produce the corresponding subcoded bits 1023, 1025, 1027. The encoder 1017 applies the code Si to the supercoded data signal, producing a composite-coded data signal.
The encoders 1007, 1017 apply codes from respective sets R, S to the data signal 1003. If the sets R, S contain NR and NS codes, respectively, then NR×NS different encodings are available. For example, if sets R, S each include 5 codes, then 25 encodings are possible. Thus, the number of available encodings increases as the product of NR and NS increases so that large numbers of encodings are possible even with small code sets. In addition, the sets R, S can be subsets of a large code set and can include different or identical codes. In this way, a set of N codes can be used to produce N2 different encodings.
The codes Ri, Si used above are selected as representative examples. More generally, codes include two or more “chips” that specify modulations to be applied to a signal. The chip modulations are applied to a signal at relative times differing by a chip duration TC. Thus, a code and a chip duration specify an encoding of a data signal. A supercode is further specified by an interchip duration. A code R, having a total duration TR, a number of chips NR, and a chip duration TRC, and a code S, having a total duration TS, a number of chips NS, and chip duration or interchip delay TSC, are effectively orthogonal as decoded if TR<TSC. A composite code can be produced from the code R (a subcode), and from the code S (a supercode). The composite code has a given duration equal to the duration of the supercode and has a number of chips equal to the product of the number of chips of the subcode and the supercode. The chip duration is equal to the subcode chip duration. In the composite code, the subcode is repeated a number of times equal to the number of chips in the supercode.
Code sets and chip durations of supercodes and subcodes (and sub-subcodes) are preferably selected so that a data signal encoded with a particular composite code is decoded only with a matching decoding composite code. Decoding with an unmatched composite code produces only a noise-like background or low amplitude “sidelobes” or “crosstalk.”
Given temporal orthogonality between a supercode and the subcode (i.e., low-amplitude cross-correlation and noise-like background), composite code sets of sufficient orthogonality can be generated from a code set with a small number of chips if the codes of the code set are sufficiently orthogonal. A code in a composite code set is generated by using a selected code of the code set as a supercode and another selected code of the code set as a subcode. A composite code set comprises all combinations of supercodes and subcodes. For example, if a code set has M codes each containing Nm chips, then the composite code set contains M×M codes each having Nm×Nm chips.
Having illustrated and demonstrated the principles of the invention, it should be apparent to those skilled in the art that the embodiments described can be modified in arrangement and detail without departing from such principles. We claim as the invention all that comes within the scope of these claims.
This application claims the benefit of U.S. Provisional Application No. 60/108,701, filed Nov. 17, 1998.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
3568167 | Carson | Mar 1971 | A |
3896420 | Szabo | Jul 1975 | A |
3922061 | Glass et al. | Nov 1975 | A |
4101976 | Castro et al. | Jul 1978 | A |
4158890 | Burland | Jun 1979 | A |
4329059 | Pond et al. | May 1982 | A |
4387955 | Ludman et al. | Jun 1983 | A |
4459682 | Mossberg | Jul 1984 | A |
4474427 | Hill et al. | Oct 1984 | A |
4533211 | Bjorklund et al. | Aug 1985 | A |
4655547 | Heritage et al. | Apr 1987 | A |
4670854 | Mossberg et al. | Jun 1987 | A |
4703474 | Foschini et al. | Oct 1987 | A |
4725110 | Glenn et al. | Feb 1988 | A |
4779266 | Chung et al. | Oct 1988 | A |
4809362 | Claus et al. | Feb 1989 | A |
4866699 | Brackett et al. | Sep 1989 | A |
4867522 | Cassidy | Sep 1989 | A |
4941733 | Leib | Jul 1990 | A |
4989199 | Rzeszewski | Jan 1991 | A |
5073980 | Prucnal et al. | Dec 1991 | A |
5132824 | Patel et al. | Jul 1992 | A |
5136666 | Anderson et al. | Aug 1992 | A |
5166818 | Chase et al. | Nov 1992 | A |
5239548 | Babbitt et al. | Aug 1993 | A |
5276637 | Mossberg | Jan 1994 | A |
5315423 | Hong | May 1994 | A |
5337382 | Mizrahi | Aug 1994 | A |
5351147 | Frenkel | Sep 1994 | A |
5367588 | Hill et al. | Nov 1994 | A |
5377288 | Kashyap et al. | Dec 1994 | A |
5383179 | Saini et al. | Jan 1995 | A |
5388173 | Glenn | Feb 1995 | A |
5467212 | Huber | Nov 1995 | A |
5519526 | Chua et al. | May 1996 | A |
5568301 | Tiemann et al. | Oct 1996 | A |
5600466 | Tsushima et al. | Feb 1997 | A |
5668901 | Keck et al. | Sep 1997 | A |
5701186 | Huber | Dec 1997 | A |
5712932 | Alexander et al. | Jan 1998 | A |
5718738 | Kohnke et al. | Feb 1998 | A |
5726785 | Chawki et al. | Mar 1998 | A |
5729548 | Holender | Mar 1998 | A |
5737106 | Sansonetti et al. | Apr 1998 | A |
5742416 | Mizrahi | Apr 1998 | A |
5748350 | Pan et al. | May 1998 | A |
5748814 | Painchaud et al. | May 1998 | A |
5760941 | Young et al. | Jun 1998 | A |
5761351 | Johnson | Jun 1998 | A |
5764829 | Judkins et al. | Jun 1998 | A |
5784506 | Pfeiffer | Jul 1998 | A |
5790287 | Darcie et al. | Aug 1998 | A |
5793907 | Jalali et al. | Aug 1998 | A |
5796502 | Haller, Jr. | Aug 1998 | A |
5805583 | Rakib | Sep 1998 | A |
5808764 | Frigo et al. | Sep 1998 | A |
5812318 | Babbitt et al. | Sep 1998 | A |
5825520 | Huber | Oct 1998 | A |
5841776 | Chen | Nov 1998 | A |
5850189 | Sakanaka et al. | Dec 1998 | A |
5859716 | O'Sullivan et al. | Jan 1999 | A |
5886539 | Bell | Mar 1999 | A |
5907421 | Warren et al. | May 1999 | A |
6292282 | Mossberg et al. | Sep 2001 | B1 |
6313771 | Munroe et al. | Nov 2001 | B1 |
6314220 | Mossberg et al. | Nov 2001 | B1 |
6381053 | Fathallah et al. | Apr 2002 | B1 |
6404956 | Brennan, III et al. | Jun 2002 | B1 |
6765908 | Chen | Jul 2004 | B1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
0 100 418 | Feb 1984 | EP |
0 231 629 | Dec 1987 | EP |
2 178 262 | Apr 1987 | GB |
2 189 038 | Oct 1987 | GB |
1-282931 | Nov 1989 | JP |
6-350566 | Dec 1994 | JP |
7-007523 | Jan 1995 | JP |
WO 9823057 | May 1998 | WO |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
60108701 | Nov 1998 | US |