The present application claims the benefit of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 13/927,398 for a Code Symbol Reading System Having Adaptive Autofocus filed Jun. 26, 2013 (and published Jan. 1, 2015 as U.S. Patent Application Publication No. 2015/0001304), now U.S. Pat. No. 9,104,929. Each of the foregoing patent application, patent publication, and patent is hereby incorporated by reference in its entirety.
The present invention relates to the field of code symbol readers, more specifically, to a code symbol reading system having adaptive autofocus.
Mobile computer devices such as smartphones have become an increasingly popular way to scan code symbols (e.g., barcodes) because of their highly functional camera technology as well as their ubiquity. Generally speaking, the greatest challenge when scanning a barcode with a smartphone is first getting the barcode in focus. Presently, most smartphones utilize an autofocus routine that attempts to get an image into focus. This procedure is quite time consuming, principally because the autofocus routine initiates the process without any real sense of the proper focal distance. As a result, the smartphone often spends a great deal of time readjusting the focal distance as it searches for the proper focal setting that will bring the barcode into focus at least enough to read the barcode. Autofocus routines are often hampered in their efforts by excessive motion and poor lighting conditions. This often leads to a significant time delay when scanning a barcode and accounts for the vast majority of the overall scan time.
Therefore, a need exists for a system for reading code symbols that is capable of generating faster readings of code symbols by first making an educated guess at where the focus should be fixed before a barcode scan is attempted.
Accordingly, in one aspect, the present invention embraces a system for reading code symbols having adaptive autofocus. The system for reading code symbols includes an imaging subsystem for capturing images within the imaging subsystem's field of view. The imaging subsystem includes a focusing module. The system for reading code symbols also includes an image processor. The image processor is configured for selecting an initial, predicted focal distance for the imaging subsystem's focusing module. The image processor is also configured for processing an image of a code symbol captured by the imaging subsystem in order to decode the code symbol. The image processor is also configured for storing in memory the focal distance associated with the decoded code symbol. The image processor is configured to select the initial, predicted focal distance as a function of memorized focal distance(s) associated with previously decoded code symbol(s).
In an exemplary embodiment, the image processor is configured to select the initial, predicted focal distance as a function of a plurality of memorized focal distances associated with previously decoded code symbols.
In another exemplary embodiment, the image processor is configured to perform an autofocus routine if processing the captured image of the code symbol at the initial, predicted focal distance fails to decode the code symbol.
In yet another exemplary embodiment, the image processor is configured to perform an autofocus routine if the number of memorized focal distances associated with previously decoded code symbols is less than a predetermined minimum.
In yet another exemplary embodiment, the imaging subsystem detects the presence of a code symbol within the imaging subsystem's field of view.
In yet another exemplary embodiment, the system for reading code symbols according to the present invention also includes an object detection subsystem for detecting the presence of an object (e.g., an object bearing a code symbol) within the imaging subsystem's field of view.
In yet another exemplary embodiment, the system for reading code symbols according to the present invention also includes a hand-supportable housing. The imaging subsystem and image processor are disposed within the hand-supportable housing.
In yet another exemplary embodiment, the system for reading code symbols according to the present invention also includes an input/output subsystem. The input/output subsystem outputs signals from the system for reading code symbols.
In another aspect, the present invention embraces a system for reading code symbols that includes an imaging subsystem and an image processor. The imaging subsystem captures images within the imaging subsystem's field of view. The imaging subsystem includes a focusing module. The image processor is configured for selecting an initial, predicted focal distance for the imaging subsystem's focusing module with respect to a code symbol, and to process one or more images of a code symbol captured by the imaging subsystem at the initial, predicted focal distance. The image processor is configured to perform an autofocus routine if processing a predetermined number of captured images of a code symbol fails to decode the code symbol. The image processor is also configured to store in memory the focal distance associated with the decoded code symbol if processing a captured image of the code symbol decodes the code symbol. The image processor is configured to select the initial, predicted focal distance as a function of a plurality of memorized focal distances associated with previously decoded code symbols.
In an exemplary embodiment, the image processor is configured to store in memory the initial, predicted focal distance associated with the decoded code symbol if processing a captured image of a code symbol at the initial, predicted focal distance decodes the code symbol.
In another exemplary embodiment, the image processor is configured to perform an autofocus routine if the number of memorized focal distances associated with previously decoded code symbols is less than a predetermined minimum.
In yet another exemplary embodiment, the image processor is configured to process one or more additional captured images of the code symbol after the image processor performs an autofocus routine.
In yet another exemplary embodiment, the imaging subsystem detects the presence of a code symbol within the imaging subsystem's field of view.
In yet another exemplary embodiment, the system for reading code symbols according to the present invention includes an object detection subsystem for detecting the presence of a code symbol within the imaging subsystem's field of view.
In yet another exemplary embodiment, the system for reading code symbols according to the present invention includes a hand-supportable housing. The imaging subsystem and image processor are disposed within the hand-supportable housing.
In yet another exemplary embodiment, the system for reading code symbols according to the present invention includes an input/output subsystem for outputting system signals.
The foregoing illustrative summary, as well as other exemplary objectives and/or advantages of the invention, and the manner in which the same are accomplished, are further explained within the following detailed description and its accompanying drawings.
The present invention embraces a system for reading code symbols. The term “code symbol” is intended broadly to refer to any indicia or device used to store information about an object, including barcodes, linear barcodes, 1D barcodes, matrix barcodes, 2D barcodes, QR codes, RFID tags, and optical character recognition (OCR) symbols. When a code symbol is read, the information encoded in the code symbol is decoded. Referring now to
The imaging subsystem 110 of the system 100 according to the present invention includes a focusing module 115. The focusing module 115 functions to bring into focus the code symbol of interest such that the code symbol may be read. Typically, the focusing module includes (i) a lens assembly having one or more lenses and (ii) a small autofocus motor which manipulates the lens assembly to adjust its field of focus. The autofocus motor manipulates the lens assembly by changing the distance between the lens assembly and the image plane, or by otherwise adjusting the lens configuration, to bring the code symbol into focus. Alternatively, the focusing module could include a liquid lens module. The liquid lens module has a liquid lens having a chamber containing at least one type of liquid. A liquid lens driver applies an electric current to the liquid, and can vary the focal characteristics of the liquid lens by varying the level of electric current. These types of liquid lens modules are particularly useful in smaller, mobile devices because they do not require moving parts.
The system 100 according to the present invention also includes an image processor 120. Rather than immediately initiating a potentially time-consuming autofocus routine prior to capturing an image of a code symbol, the image processor 120 first selects an initial, predicted focal distance for the imaging subsystem's 110 focusing module 120. In other words, the image processor 120 estimates the focal distance at which the system 100 should attempt to capture the image of the code symbol. The method used to estimate the focal distance is described below in detail.
After an image of a code symbol is captured by the system 100, the image processor 120 processes the image of the code symbol to decode (e.g., read) the code symbol. If the captured image of the code symbol is of sufficient quality (e.g., focal quality) to allow the image processor 120 to successfully decode the code symbol, then the image processor 120 stores in memory the focal distance associated with the decoded code symbol. In other words, when the system 100 captures an image of a code symbol, the image processor 120 (i) determines the focal distance of the focusing module at the time the image was captured, (ii) determines whether the code symbol can be decoded from the captured image, and (iii) stores in memory the focal distance of each successfully decoded code symbol at the time the image was captured. If the image processor 120 determines that the image quality is not sufficient to permit the decoding of the code symbol, the focal length associated with the unsuccessful image capture is not stored in memory. The process is repeated each time the system 100 captures an image of a code symbol, with the focal distance associated with each image capture resulting in a successful decoding being stored in memory. In this way, the system 100 creates a continuously updated record of each of the focal distances employed to decode the code symbol(s). It will be appreciated by a person of ordinary skill in the art that the number of focal distances stored in memory can vary depending on how large of a sample is desired. Prior to capturing an image of a code symbol, the image processor 120 selects the initial, predicted focal distance needed to capture an image that can successfully decode the code symbol. The initial, predicted focal distance is a function of the memorized focal distance(s) associated with the previously decoded code symbol(s).
In an exemplary embodiment of the system 100 for reading code symbols according to the present invention, the image processor 120 selects the initial, predicted focal distance as a function of a plurality of memorized focal distances associated with previously decoded code symbols. Typically, the image processor 120 selects the initial, predicted focal distance that will be used for the current scan operation (e.g., code symbol image capture) by calculating a weighted moving average of the memorized focal distances. Typically, the image processor 120 keeps a record of the temporal order of memorized focal distances. In other words, the image processor 120 records which focal distance is associated with the most recently captured image, which focal distance is associated with the next most recently captured image, and so on. Using this temporal information, the image processor 120 typically gives greater weight to the focal distances associated with the more recently captured images. This approach is particularly advantageous when reading code symbols from varying distances, because this weighted average approach assumes that the distance of the next code symbol to be scanned will be roughly the same as the distances of the latest successful scans. Because, in many instances, when a user is scanning multiple code symbols in succession, those code symbols will be at similar distances from the system 100, the approach of more heavily weighting the more recent scans typically yields improved results. For example, a worker holding the system in hand while scanning various boxes bearing a code symbol while the boxes are resting on a table of substantially uniform height would likely achieve improved results using this method since most of the code symbols will be at roughly the same distance from the system 100. Any weighting scheme could be applied to find an optimal balance between highly valuing the most recent focal length data while still taking into account focal length data over a longer trend. By way of example, a linear weighting system could be employed. By way of further example, the image processor 120 could employ an exponentially weighted moving average, which would place greater value on the focal distance associated with the most recent scan while taking into consideration all of the memorized focal distances.
In an exemplary embodiment, the image processor 120 first seeks to successfully decode an image by initiating a scan using the initial, predicted focal distance. If the image processor 120 fails to decode the image using the initial, predicted focal distance (for example, because the image is out of focus), the image processor retries the scan attempt using a traditional autofocus routine. In this way, the system 100 seeks to expedite the scanning process by first attempting to decode the code symbol using the faster, educated estimate approach described herein; if that approach is not successful, the system 100 falls back on a traditional autofocus routine.
In another exemplary embodiment, the image processor 120 first checks to see if a sufficiently large sample size of focal distances are stored in memory. If less than a predetermined minimum number of memorized focal distances associated with previously decoded code symbols reside in memory, then the image processor 120 does not attempt to generate an initial, predicted focal distance. Instead, the image processor 120 goes directly to the traditional autofocus routine to attempt to decode the code symbol. In this way, if the available data set of focal distances is below a predetermined minimum number deemed to be sufficient to generate a reliable (e.g., useful) initial, predicted focal distance, the image processor 120 will not waste time or system resources on an estimation step that is unlikely to yield an image with a suitable focal quality.
In an exemplary embodiment, the imaging subsystem 110 detects the presence of a code symbol within the imaging subsystem's 110 field of view. The presence of a code symbol may be detected by an analysis of the image pixels by the imaging subsystem 110 to determine if they are consistent with the presence of a code symbol. This analysis may be capable of detecting the presence of a code symbol even when the image quality is insufficient to support reading the code symbol. If the imaging subsystem 110 detects a code symbol within the field of view of the imaging subsystem 110, it initiates an image capture using the focal distance estimating techniques described herein.
Referring now to
Whether by successfully relying on the initial, predicted focal distance, or by falling back on a traditional autofocus routine, the system 100 ultimately obtains a successful scan of the code symbol. When the code symbol is decoded, the system 100 will need to output the resulting data (e.g., the data decoded from the code symbol) to another system (e.g., a data processing system). The data processing system may be housed either within the same device that houses the system 100 for reading code symbols, or it may be housed in a separate device (e.g., a host device). Referring now to
The system 100 for reading code symbols according to the present invention may take a variety of forms. For instance, the system 100 may be a stationary unit at a checkout register (e.g., point of sale (POS)), similar to a bioptic scanner found in most grocery stores. More typically, the system 100 for reading code symbols according to the present invention will take the form of a hand-held device such as a smartphone, a tablet computer, or a hand-held scanner. For hand-held devices, the system 100 according to the present invention includes a hand-supportable housing in which the imaging subsystem 110 and the image processor 120 are disposed.
In another aspect, the present disclosure embraces a system 100 for reading code symbols that includes an imaging subsystem 110 and an image processor 120. The image processor 120 selects an initial, predicted focal distance for the imaging subsystem's 110 focusing module with respect to a code symbol. The image processor 120 processes one or more images of the code symbol captured by the imaging subsystem 110 at the initial, predicted focal distance. If, after processing a predetermined number of captured images of the code symbol, the image processor 120 fails to decode the code symbol, then the image processor 120 performs an autofocus routine. On the other hand, if the image processor 120 is able to decode a code symbol from a captured image, then the image processor 120 stores in memory the focal distance associated with the decoded code symbol. The image processor 120 selects the initial, predicted focal distance as a function of a plurality of memorized focal distances associated with previously decoded code symbols.
To supplement the present disclosure, this application incorporates entirely by reference the following patents, patent application publications, and patent applications: U.S. Pat. Nos. 6,832,725; 7,159,783; 7,413,127; 7,726,575; 8,390,909; 8,294,969; 8,408,469; 8,408,468; 8,381,979; 8,408,464; 8,317,105; 8,366,005; 8,424,768; 8,322,622; 8,371,507; 8,376,233; 8,457,013; 8,448,863; 8,459,557; 8,469,272; U.S. Patent Application Publication No. 2012/0111946; U.S. Patent Application Publication No. 2012/0223141; U.S. Patent Application Publication No. 2012/0193423; U.S. Patent Application Publication No. 2012/0203647; U.S. Patent Application Publication No. 2012/0248188; U.S. Patent Application Publication No. 2012/0228382; U.S. Patent Application Publication No. 2012/0193407; U.S. Patent Application Publication No. 2012/0168511; U.S. Patent Application Publication No. 2012/0168512; U.S. Patent Application Publication No. 2010/0177749; U.S. Patent Application Publication No. 2010/0177080; U.S. Patent Application Publication No. 2010/0177707; U.S. Patent Application Publication No. 2010/0177076; U.S. Patent Application Publication No. 2009/0134221; U.S. Patent Application Publication No. 2012/0318869; U.S. Patent Application Publication No. 2013/0043312; U.S. Patent Application Publication No. 2013/0068840; U.S. Patent Application Publication No. 2013/0070322; U.S. Patent Application Publication No. 2013/0075168; U.S. Patent Application Publication No. 2013/0056285; U.S. Patent Application Publication No. 2013/0075464; U.S. Patent Application Publication No. 2013/0082104; U.S. Patent Application Publication No. 2010/0225757; U.S. patent application Ser. No. 13/347,219 for an OMNIDIRECTIONAL LASER SCANNING BAR CODE SYMBOL READER GENERATING A LASER SCANNING PATTERN WITH A HIGHLY NON-UNIFORM SCAN DENSITY WITH RESPECT TO LINE ORIENTATION, filed Jan. 10, 2012 (Good); U.S. patent application Ser. No. 13/347,193 for a HYBRID-TYPE BIOPTICAL LASER SCANNING AND DIGITAL IMAGING SYSTEM EMPLOYING DIGITAL IMAGER WITH FIELD OF VIEW OVERLAPPING FIELD OF FIELD OF LASER SCANNING SUBSYSTEM, filed Jan. 10, 2012 (Kearney et al.); U.S. patent application Ser. No. 13/367,047 for LASER SCANNING MODULES EMBODYING SILICONE SCAN ELEMENT WITH TORSIONAL HINGES, filed Feb. 6, 2012 (Feng et al.); U.S. patent application Ser. No. 13/400,748 for a LASER SCANNING BAR CODE SYMBOL READING SYSTEM HAVING INTELLIGENT SCAN SWEEP ANGLE ADJUSTMENT CAPABILITIES OVER THE WORKING RANGE OF THE SYSTEM FOR OPTIMIZED BAR CODE SYMBOL READING PERFORMANCE, filed Feb. 21, 2012 (Wilz); U.S. patent application Ser. No. 13/432,197 for a LASER SCANNING SYSTEM USING LASER BEAM SOURCES FOR PRODUCING LONG AND SHORT WAVELENGTHS IN COMBINATION WITH BEAM-WAIST EXTENDING OPTICS TO EXTEND THE DEPTH OF FIELD THEREOF WHILE RESOLVING HIGH RESOLUTION BAR CODE SYMBOLS HAVING MINIMUM CODE ELEMENT WIDTHS, filed Mar. 28, 2012 (Havens et al.); U.S. patent application Ser. No. 13/492,883 for a LASER SCANNING MODULE WITH ROTATABLY ADJUSTABLE LASER SCANNING ASSEMBLY, filed Jun. 10, 2012 (Hennick et al.); U.S. patent application Ser. No. 13/367,978 for a LASER SCANNING MODULE EMPLOYING AN ELASTOMERIC U-HINGE BASED LASER SCANNING ASSEMBLY, filed Feb. 7, 2012 (Feng et al.); U.S. patent application Ser. No. 13/852,097 for a System and Method for Capturing and Preserving Vehicle Event Data, filed Mar. 28, 2013 (Barker et al.); U.S. patent application Ser. No. 13/780,356 for a Mobile Device Having Object-Identification Interface, filed Feb. 28, 2013 (Samek et al.); U.S. patent application Ser. No. 13/780,158 for a Distraction Avoidance System, filed Feb. 28, 2013 (Sauerwein); U.S. patent application Ser. No. 13/784,933 for an Integrated Dimensioning and Weighing System, filed Mar. 5, 2013 (McCloskey et al.); U.S. patent application Ser. No. 13/785,177 for a Dimensioning System, filed Mar. 5, 2013 (McCloskey et al.); U.S. patent application Ser. No. 13/780,196 for Android Bound Service Camera Initialization, filed Feb. 28, 2013 (Todeschini et al.); U.S. patent application Ser. No. 13/792,322 for a Replaceable Connector, filed Mar. 11, 2013 (Skvoretz); U.S. patent application Ser. No. 13/780,271 for a Vehicle Computer System with Transparent Display, filed Feb. 28, 2013 (Fitch et al.); U.S. patent application Ser. No. 13/736,139 for an Electronic Device Enclosure, filed Jan. 8, 2013 (Chaney); U.S. patent application Ser. No. 13/771,508 for an Optical Redirection Adapter, filed Feb. 20, 2013 (Anderson); U.S. patent application Ser. No. 13/750,304 for Measuring Object Dimensions Using Mobile Computer, filed Jan. 25, 2013; U.S. patent application Ser. No. 13/471,973 for Terminals and Methods for Dimensioning Objects, filed May 15, 2012; U.S. patent application Ser. No. 13/895,846 for a Method of Programming a Symbol Reading System, filed Apr. 10, 2013 (Corcoran); U.S. patent application Ser. No. 13/867,386 for a Point of Sale (POS) Based Checkout System Supporting a Customer-Transparent Two-Factor Authentication Process During Product Checkout Operations, filed Apr. 22, 2013 (Cunningham et al.); U.S. patent application Ser. No. 13/888,884 for an Indicia Reading System Employing Digital Gain Control, filed May 7, 2013 (Xian et al.); U.S. patent application Ser. No. 13/895,616 for a Laser Scanning Code Symbol Reading System Employing Multi-Channel Scan Data Signal Processing with Synchronized Digital Gain Control (SDGC) for Full Range Scanning, filed May 16, 2013 (Xian et al.); U.S. patent application Ser. No. 13/897,512 for a Laser Scanning Code Symbol Reading System Providing Improved Control over the Length and Intensity Characteristics of a Laser Scan Line Projected Therefrom Using Laser Source Blanking Control, filed May 20, 2013 (Brady et al.); U.S. patent application Ser. No. 13/897,634 for a Laser Scanning Code Symbol Reading System Employing Programmable Decode Time-Window Filtering, filed May 20, 2013 (Wilz, Sr. et al.); U.S. patent application Ser. No. 13/902,242 for a System For Providing A Continuous Communication Link With A Symbol Reading Device, filed May 24, 2013 (Smith et al.); U.S. patent application Ser. No. 13/902,144, for a System and Method for Display of Information Using a Vehicle-Mount Computer, filed May 24, 2013 (Chamberlin); U.S. patent application Ser. No. 13/902,110 for a System and Method for Display of Information Using a Vehicle-Mount Computer, filed May 24, 2013 (Hollifield); U.S. patent application Ser. No. 13/912,262 for a Method of Error Correction for 3D Imaging Device, filed Jun. 7, 2013 (Jovanovski et al.) and U.S. patent application Ser. No. 13/912,702 for a System and Method for Reading Code Symbols at Long Range Using Source Power Control, filed Jun. 7, 2013 (Xian et al.).
In the specification and/or figures, typical embodiments of the invention have been disclosed. The present invention is not limited to such exemplary embodiments. The use of the term “and/or” includes any and all combinations of one or more of the associated listed items. The figures are schematic representations and so are not necessarily drawn to scale. Unless otherwise noted, specific terms have been used in a generic and descriptive sense and not for purposes of limitation.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
6336587 | He et al. | Jan 2002 | B1 |
6832725 | Gardiner et al. | Dec 2004 | B2 |
7128266 | Zhu et al. | Oct 2006 | B2 |
7159783 | Walczyk et al. | Jan 2007 | B2 |
7413127 | Ehrhart et al. | Aug 2008 | B2 |
7726575 | Wang et al. | Jun 2010 | B2 |
8294969 | Plesko | Oct 2012 | B2 |
8317105 | Kotlarsky et al. | Nov 2012 | B2 |
8322622 | Liu | Dec 2012 | B2 |
8366001 | Craen et al. | Feb 2013 | B2 |
8366005 | Kotlarsky et al. | Feb 2013 | B2 |
8371507 | Haggerty et al. | Feb 2013 | B2 |
8376233 | Van Horn et al. | Feb 2013 | B2 |
8381979 | Franz | Feb 2013 | B2 |
8390909 | Plesko | Mar 2013 | B2 |
8408464 | Zhu et al. | Apr 2013 | B2 |
8408468 | Horn et al. | Apr 2013 | B2 |
8408469 | Good | Apr 2013 | B2 |
8424768 | Rueblinger et al. | Apr 2013 | B2 |
8448863 | Xian et al. | May 2013 | B2 |
8457013 | Essinger et al. | Jun 2013 | B2 |
8459557 | Havens et al. | Jun 2013 | B2 |
8469272 | Kearney | Jun 2013 | B2 |
8474712 | Kearney et al. | Jul 2013 | B2 |
8479992 | Kotlarsky et al. | Jul 2013 | B2 |
8490877 | Kearney | Jul 2013 | B2 |
8517271 | Kotlarsky et al. | Aug 2013 | B2 |
8523076 | Good | Sep 2013 | B2 |
8528818 | Ehrhart et al. | Sep 2013 | B2 |
8544737 | Gomez et al. | Oct 2013 | B2 |
8548420 | Grunow et al. | Oct 2013 | B2 |
8550335 | Samek et al. | Oct 2013 | B2 |
8550354 | Gannon et al. | Oct 2013 | B2 |
8550357 | Kearney | Oct 2013 | B2 |
8556174 | Kosecki et al. | Oct 2013 | B2 |
8556176 | Van Horn et al. | Oct 2013 | B2 |
8556177 | Hussey et al. | Oct 2013 | B2 |
8559767 | Barber et al. | Oct 2013 | B2 |
8561895 | Gomez et al. | Oct 2013 | B2 |
8561903 | Sauerwein | Oct 2013 | B2 |
8561905 | Edmonds et al. | Oct 2013 | B2 |
8565107 | Pease et al. | Oct 2013 | B2 |
8571307 | Li et al. | Oct 2013 | B2 |
8579200 | Samek et al. | Nov 2013 | B2 |
8583924 | Caballero et al. | Nov 2013 | B2 |
8584945 | Wang et al. | Nov 2013 | B2 |
8587595 | Wang | Nov 2013 | B2 |
8587697 | Hussey et al. | Nov 2013 | B2 |
8588869 | Sauerwein et al. | Nov 2013 | B2 |
8590789 | Nahill et al. | Nov 2013 | B2 |
8596539 | Havens et al. | Dec 2013 | B2 |
8596542 | Havens et al. | Dec 2013 | B2 |
8596543 | Havens et al. | Dec 2013 | B2 |
8599271 | Havens et al. | Dec 2013 | B2 |
8599957 | Peake et al. | Dec 2013 | B2 |
8600158 | Li et al. | Dec 2013 | B2 |
8600167 | Showering | Dec 2013 | B2 |
8602309 | Longacre et al. | Dec 2013 | B2 |
8608053 | Meier et al. | Dec 2013 | B2 |
8608071 | Liu et al. | Dec 2013 | B2 |
8608075 | Tanimoto et al. | Dec 2013 | B2 |
8611309 | Wang et al. | Dec 2013 | B2 |
8615487 | Gomez et al. | Dec 2013 | B2 |
8621123 | Caballero | Dec 2013 | B2 |
8622303 | Meier et al. | Jan 2014 | B2 |
8628013 | Ding | Jan 2014 | B2 |
8628015 | Wang et al. | Jan 2014 | B2 |
8628016 | Winegar | Jan 2014 | B2 |
8629926 | Wang | Jan 2014 | B2 |
8630491 | Longacre et al. | Jan 2014 | B2 |
8635309 | Berthiaume et al. | Jan 2014 | B2 |
8636200 | Kearney | Jan 2014 | B2 |
8636212 | Nahill et al. | Jan 2014 | B2 |
8636215 | Ding et al. | Jan 2014 | B2 |
8636224 | Wang | Jan 2014 | B2 |
8638806 | Wang et al. | Jan 2014 | B2 |
8640958 | Lu et al. | Feb 2014 | B2 |
8640960 | Wang et al. | Feb 2014 | B2 |
8643717 | Li et al. | Feb 2014 | B2 |
8646692 | Meier et al. | Feb 2014 | B2 |
8646694 | Wang et al. | Feb 2014 | B2 |
8651384 | Ogawa et al. | Feb 2014 | B2 |
8657200 | Ren et al. | Feb 2014 | B2 |
8659397 | Vargo et al. | Feb 2014 | B2 |
8668149 | Good | Mar 2014 | B2 |
8678285 | Kearney | Mar 2014 | B2 |
8678286 | Smith et al. | Mar 2014 | B2 |
8682077 | Longacre | Mar 2014 | B1 |
D702237 | Oberpriller et al. | Apr 2014 | S |
8687282 | Feng et al. | Apr 2014 | B2 |
8692927 | Pease et al. | Apr 2014 | B2 |
8695880 | Bremer et al. | Apr 2014 | B2 |
8698949 | Grunow et al. | Apr 2014 | B2 |
8702000 | Barber et al. | Apr 2014 | B2 |
8717494 | Gannon | May 2014 | B2 |
8720783 | Biss et al. | May 2014 | B2 |
8723804 | Fletcher et al. | May 2014 | B2 |
8723904 | Marty et al. | May 2014 | B2 |
8727223 | Wang | May 2014 | B2 |
8740082 | Wilz | Jun 2014 | B2 |
8740085 | Furlong et al. | Jun 2014 | B2 |
8746563 | Hennick et al. | Jun 2014 | B2 |
8750445 | Peake et al. | Jun 2014 | B2 |
8752766 | Xian et al. | Jun 2014 | B2 |
8756059 | Braho et al. | Jun 2014 | B2 |
8757495 | Qu et al. | Jun 2014 | B2 |
8760563 | Koziol et al. | Jun 2014 | B2 |
8763909 | Reed et al. | Jul 2014 | B2 |
8777108 | Coyle | Jul 2014 | B2 |
8777109 | Oberpriller et al. | Jul 2014 | B2 |
8779898 | Havens et al. | Jul 2014 | B2 |
8781520 | Payne et al. | Jul 2014 | B2 |
8783573 | Havens et al. | Jul 2014 | B2 |
8789757 | Barten | Jul 2014 | B2 |
8789758 | Hawley et al. | Jul 2014 | B2 |
8789759 | Xian et al. | Jul 2014 | B2 |
8794520 | Wang et al. | Aug 2014 | B2 |
8794522 | Ehrhart | Aug 2014 | B2 |
8794525 | Amundsen et al. | Aug 2014 | B2 |
8794526 | Wang et al. | Aug 2014 | B2 |
8798367 | Ellis | Aug 2014 | B2 |
8807431 | Wang et al. | Aug 2014 | B2 |
8807432 | Van Horn et al. | Aug 2014 | B2 |
8820630 | Qu et al. | Sep 2014 | B2 |
8822848 | Meagher | Sep 2014 | B2 |
8824692 | Sheerin et al. | Sep 2014 | B2 |
8824696 | Braho | Sep 2014 | B2 |
8842849 | Wahl et al. | Sep 2014 | B2 |
8844822 | Kotlarsky et al. | Sep 2014 | B2 |
8844823 | Fritz et al. | Sep 2014 | B2 |
8849019 | Li et al. | Sep 2014 | B2 |
D716285 | Chaney et al. | Oct 2014 | S |
8851383 | Yeakley et al. | Oct 2014 | B2 |
8854633 | Laffargue | Oct 2014 | B2 |
8866963 | Grunow et al. | Oct 2014 | B2 |
8868421 | Braho et al. | Oct 2014 | B2 |
8868519 | Maloy et al. | Oct 2014 | B2 |
8868802 | Barten | Oct 2014 | B2 |
8868803 | Caballero | Oct 2014 | B2 |
8870074 | Gannon | Oct 2014 | B1 |
8879639 | Sauerwein | Nov 2014 | B2 |
8880426 | Smith | Nov 2014 | B2 |
8881983 | Havens et al. | Nov 2014 | B2 |
8881987 | Wang | Nov 2014 | B2 |
8903172 | Smith | Dec 2014 | B2 |
8908995 | Benos et al. | Dec 2014 | B2 |
8910870 | Li et al. | Dec 2014 | B2 |
8910875 | Ren et al. | Dec 2014 | B2 |
8914290 | Hendrickson et al. | Dec 2014 | B2 |
8914788 | Pettinelli et al. | Dec 2014 | B2 |
8915439 | Feng et al. | Dec 2014 | B2 |
8915444 | Havens et al. | Dec 2014 | B2 |
8916789 | Woodburn | Dec 2014 | B2 |
8918250 | Hollifield | Dec 2014 | B2 |
8918564 | Caballero | Dec 2014 | B2 |
8925818 | Kosecki et al. | Jan 2015 | B2 |
8939374 | Jovanovski et al. | Jan 2015 | B2 |
8942480 | Ellis | Jan 2015 | B2 |
8944313 | Williams et al. | Feb 2015 | B2 |
8944327 | Meier et al. | Feb 2015 | B2 |
8944332 | Harding et al. | Feb 2015 | B2 |
8950678 | Germaine et al. | Feb 2015 | B2 |
D723560 | Zhou et al. | Mar 2015 | S |
8967468 | Gomez et al. | Mar 2015 | B2 |
8971346 | Sevier | Mar 2015 | B2 |
8976030 | Cunningham et al. | Mar 2015 | B2 |
8976368 | Akel et al. | Mar 2015 | B2 |
8978981 | Guan | Mar 2015 | B2 |
8978983 | Bremer et al. | Mar 2015 | B2 |
8978984 | Hennick et al. | Mar 2015 | B2 |
8985456 | Zhu et al. | Mar 2015 | B2 |
8985457 | Soule et al. | Mar 2015 | B2 |
8985459 | Kearney et al. | Mar 2015 | B2 |
8985461 | Gelay et al. | Mar 2015 | B2 |
8988578 | Showering | Mar 2015 | B2 |
8988590 | Gillet et al. | Mar 2015 | B2 |
8991704 | Hopper et al. | Mar 2015 | B2 |
8996194 | Davis et al. | Mar 2015 | B2 |
8996384 | Funyak et al. | Mar 2015 | B2 |
8998091 | Edmonds et al. | Apr 2015 | B2 |
9002641 | Showering | Apr 2015 | B2 |
9007368 | Laffargue et al. | Apr 2015 | B2 |
9010641 | Qu et al. | Apr 2015 | B2 |
9015513 | Murawski et al. | Apr 2015 | B2 |
9016576 | Brady et al. | Apr 2015 | B2 |
D730357 | Fitch et al. | May 2015 | S |
9022288 | Nahill et al. | May 2015 | B2 |
9030964 | Essinger et al. | May 2015 | B2 |
9033240 | Smith et al. | May 2015 | B2 |
9033242 | Gillet et al. | May 2015 | B2 |
9036054 | Koziol et al. | May 2015 | B2 |
9037344 | Chamberlin | May 2015 | B2 |
9038911 | Xian et al. | May 2015 | B2 |
9038915 | Smith | May 2015 | B2 |
D730901 | Oberpriller et al. | Jun 2015 | S |
D730902 | Fitch et al. | Jun 2015 | S |
D733112 | Chaney et al. | Jun 2015 | S |
9047098 | Barten | Jun 2015 | B2 |
9047359 | Caballero et al. | Jun 2015 | B2 |
9047420 | Caballero | Jun 2015 | B2 |
9047525 | Barber | Jun 2015 | B2 |
9047531 | Showering et al. | Jun 2015 | B2 |
9049640 | Wang et al. | Jun 2015 | B2 |
9053055 | Caballero | Jun 2015 | B2 |
9053378 | Hou et al. | Jun 2015 | B1 |
9053380 | Xian et al. | Jun 2015 | B2 |
9057641 | Amundsen et al. | Jun 2015 | B2 |
9058526 | Powilleit | Jun 2015 | B2 |
9064165 | Havens et al. | Jun 2015 | B2 |
9064167 | Xian et al. | Jun 2015 | B2 |
9064168 | Todeschini et al. | Jun 2015 | B2 |
9064254 | Todeschini et al. | Jun 2015 | B2 |
9066032 | Wang | Jun 2015 | B2 |
9070032 | Corcoran | Jun 2015 | B2 |
D734339 | Zhou et al. | Jul 2015 | S |
D734751 | Oberpriller et al. | Jul 2015 | S |
9082023 | Feng et al. | Jul 2015 | B2 |
9104929 | Todeschini | Aug 2015 | B2 |
20040118919 | Breytman et al. | Jun 2004 | A1 |
20070063048 | Havens et al. | Mar 2007 | A1 |
20070131770 | Nunnink | Jun 2007 | A1 |
20090072037 | Good et al. | Mar 2009 | A1 |
20090134221 | Zhu et al. | May 2009 | A1 |
20090166426 | Giebel et al. | Jul 2009 | A1 |
20090206158 | Thuries et al. | Aug 2009 | A1 |
20100177076 | Essinger et al. | Jul 2010 | A1 |
20100177080 | Essinger et al. | Jul 2010 | A1 |
20100177707 | Essinger et al. | Jul 2010 | A1 |
20100177749 | Essinger et al. | Jul 2010 | A1 |
20110169999 | Grunow et al. | Jul 2011 | A1 |
20110202554 | Powilleit et al. | Aug 2011 | A1 |
20120111946 | Golant | May 2012 | A1 |
20120168512 | Kotlarsky et al. | Jul 2012 | A1 |
20120193423 | Samek | Aug 2012 | A1 |
20120203647 | Smith | Aug 2012 | A1 |
20120223141 | Good et al. | Sep 2012 | A1 |
20120237193 | Kawarada | Sep 2012 | A1 |
20130043312 | Van Horn | Feb 2013 | A1 |
20130075168 | Amundsen et al. | Mar 2013 | A1 |
20130175341 | Kearney et al. | Jul 2013 | A1 |
20130175343 | Good | Jul 2013 | A1 |
20130257744 | Daghigh et al. | Oct 2013 | A1 |
20130257759 | Daghigh | Oct 2013 | A1 |
20130270346 | Xian et al. | Oct 2013 | A1 |
20130287258 | Kearney | Oct 2013 | A1 |
20130292475 | Kotlarsky et al. | Nov 2013 | A1 |
20130292477 | Hennick et al. | Nov 2013 | A1 |
20130293539 | Hunt et al. | Nov 2013 | A1 |
20130293540 | Laffargue et al. | Nov 2013 | A1 |
20130306728 | Thuries et al. | Nov 2013 | A1 |
20130306731 | Pedraro | Nov 2013 | A1 |
20130307964 | Bremer et al. | Nov 2013 | A1 |
20130308625 | Park et al. | Nov 2013 | A1 |
20130313324 | Koziol et al. | Nov 2013 | A1 |
20130313325 | Wilz et al. | Nov 2013 | A1 |
20130342717 | Havens et al. | Dec 2013 | A1 |
20140001267 | Giordano et al. | Jan 2014 | A1 |
20140002828 | Laffargue et al. | Jan 2014 | A1 |
20140008439 | Wang | Jan 2014 | A1 |
20140025584 | Liu et al. | Jan 2014 | A1 |
20140034734 | Sauerwein | Feb 2014 | A1 |
20140036848 | Pease et al. | Feb 2014 | A1 |
20140039693 | Havens et al. | Feb 2014 | A1 |
20140042814 | Kather et al. | Feb 2014 | A1 |
20140049120 | Kohtz et al. | Feb 2014 | A1 |
20140049635 | Laffargue et al. | Feb 2014 | A1 |
20140061306 | Wu et al. | Mar 2014 | A1 |
20140063289 | Hussey et al. | Mar 2014 | A1 |
20140066136 | Sauerwein et al. | Mar 2014 | A1 |
20140067692 | Ye et al. | Mar 2014 | A1 |
20140070005 | Nahill et al. | Mar 2014 | A1 |
20140071840 | Venancio | Mar 2014 | A1 |
20140074746 | Wang | Mar 2014 | A1 |
20140076974 | Havens et al. | Mar 2014 | A1 |
20140078341 | Havens et al. | Mar 2014 | A1 |
20140078342 | Li et al. | Mar 2014 | A1 |
20140078345 | Showering | Mar 2014 | A1 |
20140098792 | Wang et al. | Apr 2014 | A1 |
20140100774 | Showering | Apr 2014 | A1 |
20140100813 | Showering | Apr 2014 | A1 |
20140103115 | Meier et al. | Apr 2014 | A1 |
20140104413 | McCloskey et al. | Apr 2014 | A1 |
20140104414 | McCloskey et al. | Apr 2014 | A1 |
20140104416 | Giordano et al. | Apr 2014 | A1 |
20140104451 | Todeschini et al. | Apr 2014 | A1 |
20140106594 | Skvoretz | Apr 2014 | A1 |
20140106725 | Sauerwein | Apr 2014 | A1 |
20140108010 | Maltseff et al. | Apr 2014 | A1 |
20140108402 | Gomez et al. | Apr 2014 | A1 |
20140108682 | Caballero | Apr 2014 | A1 |
20140110485 | Toa et al. | Apr 2014 | A1 |
20140114530 | Fitch et al. | Apr 2014 | A1 |
20140124577 | Wang et al. | May 2014 | A1 |
20140124579 | Ding | May 2014 | A1 |
20140125842 | Winegar | May 2014 | A1 |
20140125853 | Wang | May 2014 | A1 |
20140125999 | Longacre et al. | May 2014 | A1 |
20140129378 | Richardson | May 2014 | A1 |
20140131438 | Kearney | May 2014 | A1 |
20140131441 | Nahill et al. | May 2014 | A1 |
20140131443 | Smith | May 2014 | A1 |
20140131444 | Wang | May 2014 | A1 |
20140131445 | Ding et al. | May 2014 | A1 |
20140131448 | Xian et al. | May 2014 | A1 |
20140133379 | Wang et al. | May 2014 | A1 |
20140136208 | Maltseff et al. | May 2014 | A1 |
20140140585 | Wang | May 2014 | A1 |
20140151453 | Meier et al. | Jun 2014 | A1 |
20140152882 | Samek et al. | Jun 2014 | A1 |
20140158770 | Sevier et al. | Jun 2014 | A1 |
20140159869 | Zumsteg et al. | Jun 2014 | A1 |
20140166755 | Liu et al. | Jun 2014 | A1 |
20140166757 | Smith | Jun 2014 | A1 |
20140166758 | Goren | Jun 2014 | A1 |
20140166759 | Liu et al. | Jun 2014 | A1 |
20140168787 | Wang et al. | Jun 2014 | A1 |
20140175165 | Havens et al. | Jun 2014 | A1 |
20140175172 | Jovanovski et al. | Jun 2014 | A1 |
20140191644 | Chaney | Jul 2014 | A1 |
20140191913 | Ge et al. | Jul 2014 | A1 |
20140197238 | Liu et al. | Jul 2014 | A1 |
20140197239 | Havens et al. | Jul 2014 | A1 |
20140197304 | Feng et al. | Jul 2014 | A1 |
20140203087 | Smith et al. | Jul 2014 | A1 |
20140204268 | Grunow et al. | Jul 2014 | A1 |
20140214631 | Hansen | Jul 2014 | A1 |
20140217166 | Berthiaume et al. | Aug 2014 | A1 |
20140217180 | Liu | Aug 2014 | A1 |
20140231500 | Ehrhart et al. | Aug 2014 | A1 |
20140232930 | Anderson | Aug 2014 | A1 |
20140247315 | Marty et al. | Sep 2014 | A1 |
20140263493 | Amurgis et al. | Sep 2014 | A1 |
20140263645 | Smith et al. | Sep 2014 | A1 |
20140270196 | Braho et al. | Sep 2014 | A1 |
20140270229 | Braho | Sep 2014 | A1 |
20140278387 | DiGregorio | Sep 2014 | A1 |
20140282210 | Bianconi | Sep 2014 | A1 |
20140284384 | Lu et al. | Sep 2014 | A1 |
20140288933 | Braho et al. | Sep 2014 | A1 |
20140297058 | Barker et al. | Oct 2014 | A1 |
20140299665 | Barber et al. | Oct 2014 | A1 |
20140312121 | Lu et al. | Oct 2014 | A1 |
20140319220 | Coyle | Oct 2014 | A1 |
20140319221 | Oberpriller et al. | Oct 2014 | A1 |
20140326787 | Barten | Nov 2014 | A1 |
20140332590 | Wang et al. | Nov 2014 | A1 |
20140344943 | Todeschini et al. | Nov 2014 | A1 |
20140346233 | Liu et al. | Nov 2014 | A1 |
20140351317 | Smith et al. | Nov 2014 | A1 |
20140353373 | Van Horn et al. | Dec 2014 | A1 |
20140361073 | Qu et al. | Dec 2014 | A1 |
20140361082 | Xian et al. | Dec 2014 | A1 |
20140362184 | Jovanovski et al. | Dec 2014 | A1 |
20140363015 | Braho | Dec 2014 | A1 |
20140369511 | Sheerin et al. | Dec 2014 | A1 |
20140374483 | Lu | Dec 2014 | A1 |
20140374485 | Xian et al. | Dec 2014 | A1 |
20150001301 | Ouyang | Jan 2015 | A1 |
20150001304 | Todeschini | Jan 2015 | A1 |
20150003673 | Fletcher | Jan 2015 | A1 |
20150009338 | Laffargue et al. | Jan 2015 | A1 |
20150009610 | London et al. | Jan 2015 | A1 |
20150014416 | Kotlarsky et al. | Jan 2015 | A1 |
20150021397 | Rueblinger et al. | Jan 2015 | A1 |
20150028102 | Ren et al. | Jan 2015 | A1 |
20150028103 | Jiang | Jan 2015 | A1 |
20150028104 | Ma et al. | Jan 2015 | A1 |
20150029002 | Yeakley et al. | Jan 2015 | A1 |
20150032709 | Maloy et al. | Jan 2015 | A1 |
20150039309 | Braho et al. | Feb 2015 | A1 |
20150040378 | Saber et al. | Feb 2015 | A1 |
20150048168 | Fritz et al. | Feb 2015 | A1 |
20150049347 | Laffargue et al. | Feb 2015 | A1 |
20150051992 | Smith | Feb 2015 | A1 |
20150053766 | Havens et al. | Feb 2015 | A1 |
20150053768 | Wang et al. | Feb 2015 | A1 |
20150053769 | Thuries et al. | Feb 2015 | A1 |
20150062366 | Liu et al. | Mar 2015 | A1 |
20150063215 | Wang | Mar 2015 | A1 |
20150063676 | Lloyd et al. | Mar 2015 | A1 |
20150069130 | Gannon | Mar 2015 | A1 |
20150071819 | Todeschini | Mar 2015 | A1 |
20150083800 | Li et al. | Mar 2015 | A1 |
20150086114 | Todeschini | Mar 2015 | A1 |
20150088522 | Hendrickson et al. | Mar 2015 | A1 |
20150096872 | Woodburn | Apr 2015 | A1 |
20150099557 | Pettinelli et al. | Apr 2015 | A1 |
20150100196 | Hollifield | Apr 2015 | A1 |
20150102109 | Huck | Apr 2015 | A1 |
20150115035 | Meier et al. | Apr 2015 | A1 |
20150127791 | Kosecki et al. | May 2015 | A1 |
20150128116 | Chen et al. | May 2015 | A1 |
20150129659 | Feng et al. | May 2015 | A1 |
20150133047 | Smith et al. | May 2015 | A1 |
20150134470 | Hejl et al. | May 2015 | A1 |
20150136851 | Harding et al. | May 2015 | A1 |
20150136854 | Lu et al. | May 2015 | A1 |
20150142492 | Kumar | May 2015 | A1 |
20150144692 | Hejl | May 2015 | A1 |
20150144698 | Teng et al. | May 2015 | A1 |
20150144701 | Xian et al. | May 2015 | A1 |
20150149946 | Benos et al. | May 2015 | A1 |
20150161429 | Xian | Jun 2015 | A1 |
20150169925 | Chen et al. | Jun 2015 | A1 |
20150169929 | Williams et al. | Jun 2015 | A1 |
20150186703 | Chen et al. | Jul 2015 | A1 |
20150193644 | Kearney et al. | Jul 2015 | A1 |
20150193645 | Colavito et al. | Jul 2015 | A1 |
20150199957 | Funyak et al. | Jul 2015 | A1 |
20150204671 | Showering | Jul 2015 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
2013163789 | Nov 2013 | WO |
2013173985 | Nov 2013 | WO |
2014019130 | Feb 2014 | WO |
2014110495 | Jul 2014 | WO |
Entry |
---|
U.S. Appl. No. 13/367,978, filed Feb. 7, 2012, (Feng et al.); now abandoned. |
U.S. Appl. No. 14/462,801 for Mobile Computing Device With Data Cognition Software, filed Aug. 19, 2014 (Todeschini et al.); 38 pages. |
U.S. Appl. No. 14/596,757 for System and Method for Detecting Barcode Printing Errors filed Jan. 14, 2015 (Ackley); 41 pages. |
U.S. Appl. No. 14/277,337 for Multipurpose Optical Reader, filed May 14, 2014 (Jovanovski et al.); 59 pages. |
U.S. Appl. No. 14/200,405 for Indicia Reader for Size-Limited Applications filed Mar. 7, 2014 (Feng et al.); 42 pages. |
U.S. Appl. No. 14/662,922 for Multifunction Point of Sale System filed Mar. 19, 2015 (Van Horn et al.); 41 pages. |
U.S. Appl. No. 14/446,391 for Multifunction Point of Sale Apparatus With Optical Signature Capture filed Jul. 30, 2014 (Good et al.); 37 pages. |
U.S. Appl. No. 29/528,165 for In-Counter Barcode Scanner filed May 27, 2015 (Oberpriller et al.); 13 pages. |
U.S. Appl. No. 29/528,890 for Mobile Computer Housing filed Jun. 2, 2015 (Fitch et al.); 61 pages. |
U.S. Appl. No. 14/614,796 for Cargo Apportionment Techniques filed Feb. 5, 2015 (Morton et al.); 56 pages. |
U.S. Appl. No. 29/516,892 for Table Computer filed Feb. 6, 2015 (Bidwell et al.); 13 pages. |
U.S. Appl. No. 29/523,098 for Handle for a Tablet Computer filed Apr. 7, 2015 (Bidwell et al.); 17 pages. |
U.S. Appl. No. 14/578,627 for Safety System and Method filed Dec. 22, 2014 (Ackley et al.); 32 pages. |
U.S. Appl. No. 14/573,022 for Dynamic Diagnostic Indicator Generation filed Dec. 17, 2014 (Goldsmith); 43 pages. |
U.S. Appl. No. 14/529,857 for Barcode Reader With Security Features filed Oct. 31, 2014 (Todeschini et al.); 32 pages. |
U.S. Appl. No. 14/519,195 for Handheld Dimensioning System With Feedback filed Oct. 21, 2014 (Laffargue et al.); 39 pages. |
U.S. Appl. No. 14/519,211 for System and Method for Dimensioning filed Oct. 21, 2014 (Ackley et al.); 33 pages. |
U.S. Appl. No. 14/519,233 for Handheld Dimensioner With Data-Quality Indication filed Oct. 21, 2014 (Laffargue et al.); 36 pages. |
U.S. Appl. No. 14/533,319 for Barcode Scanning System Using Wearable Device With Embedded Camera filed Nov. 5, 2014 (Todeschini); 29 pages. |
U.S. Appl. No. 14/748,446 for Cordless Indicia Reader With a Multifunction Coil for Wireless Charging and Eas Deactivation, filed Jun. 24, 2015 (Xie et al.); 34 pages. |
U.S. Appl. No. 29/528,590 for Electronic Device filed May 29, 2015 (Fitch et al.); 9 pages. |
U.S. Appl. No. 14/519,249 for Handheld Dimensioning System With Measurement-Conformance Feedback filed Oct. 21, 2014 (Ackley et al.); 36 pages. |
U.S. Appl. No. 29/519,017 for Scanner filed Mar. 2, 2015 (Zhou et al.); 11 pages. |
U.S. Appl. No. 14/398,542 for Portable Electronic Devices Having a Separate Location Trigger Unit for Use in Controlling an Application Unit filed Nov. 3, 2014 (Bian et al.); 22 pages. |
U.S. Appl. No. 14/405,278 for Design Pattern for Secure Store filed Mar. 9, 2015 (Zhu et al.); 23 pages. |
U.S. Appl. No. 14/590,024 for Shelving and Package Locating Systems for Delivery Vehicles filed Jan. 6, 2015 (Payne); 31 pages. |
U.S. Appl. No. 14/568,305 for Auto-Contrast Viewfinder for an Indicia Reader filed Dec. 12, 2014 (Todeschini); 29 pages. |
U.S. Appl. No. 29/526,918 for Charging Base filed May 14, 2015 (Fitch et al.); 10 pages. |
U.S. Appl. No. 14/580,262 for Media Gate for Thermal Transfer Printers filed Dec. 23, 2014 (Bowles); 36 pages. |
Examination Report in counterpart United Kingdom Application No. GB1410734.6 dated Oct. 6, 2015, pp. 1-2. |
Search and Exam Report in Application No. GB1410734.6, related to Current Application, Dated Dec. 18, 2014, 6 pages. |
Examination Report in counterpart United Kingdom Application No. GB1410734.6 dated Jul. 17, 2015, pp. 1-3. |
U.S. Appl. No. 14/519,179 for Dimensioning System With Multipath Interference Mitigation filed Oct. 21, 2014 (Thuries et al.); 30 pages. |
U.S. Appl. No. 14/264,173 for Autofocus Lens System for Indicia Readers filed Apr. 29, 2014, (Ackley et al.); 39 pages. |
U.S. Appl. No. 14/453,019 for Dimensioning System With Guided Alignment, filed Aug. 6, 2014 (Li et al.); 31 pages. |
U.S. Appl. No. 14/452,697 for Interactive Indicia Reader , filed Aug. 6, 2014, (Todeschini); 32 pages. |
U.S. Appl. No. 14/231,898 for Hand-Mounted Indicia-Reading Device with Finger Motion Triggering filed Apr. 1, 2014 (Van Horn et al.); 36 pages. |
U.S. Appl. No. 14/715,916 for Evaluating Image Values filed May 19, 2015 (Ackley); 60 pages. |
U.S. Appl. No. 14/513,808 for Identifying Inventory Items in a Storage Facility filed Oct. 14, 2014 (Singel et al.); 51 pages. |
U.S. Appl. No. 29/458,405 for an Electronic Device, filed Jun. 19, 2013 (Fitch et al.); 22 pages. |
U.S. Appl. No. 29/459,620 for an Electronic Device Enclosure, filed Jul. 2, 2013 (London et al.); 21 pages. |
U.S. Appl. No. 14/483,056 for Variable Depth of Field Barcode Scanner filed Sep. 10, 2014 (McCloskey et al.); 29 pages. |
U.S. Appl. No. 14/531,154 for Directing an Inspector Through an Inspection filed Nov. 3, 2014 (Miller et al.); 53 pages. |
U.S. Appl. No. 29/525,068 for Tablet Computer With Removable Scanning Device filed Apr. 27, 2015 (Schulte et al.); 19 pages. |
U.S. Appl. No. 29/468,118 for an Electronic Device Case, filed Sep. 26, 2013 (Oberpriller et al.); 44 pages. |
U.S. Appl. No. 14/340,627 for an Axially Reinforced Flexible Scan Element, filed Jul. 25, 2014 (Reublinger et al.); 41 pages. |
U.S. Appl. No. 14/676,327 for Device Management Proxy for Secure Devices filed Apr. 1, 2015 (Yeakley et al.); 50 pages. |
U.S. Appl. No. 14/257,364 for Docking System and Method Using Near Field Communication filed Apr. 21, 2014 (Showering); 31 pages. |
U.S. Appl. No. 14/327,827 for a Mobile-Phone Adapter for Electronic Transactions, filed Jul. 10, 2014 (Hejl); 25 pages. |
U.S. Appl. No. 14/334,934 for a System and Method for Indicia Verification, filed Jul. 18, 2014 (Hejl); 38 pages. |
U.S. Appl. No. 29/530,600 for Cyclone filed Jun. 18, 2015 (Vargo et al); 16 pages. |
U.S. Appl. No. 14/707,123 for Application Independent DEX/UCS Interface filed May 8, 2015 (Pape); 47 pages. |
U.S. Appl. No. 14/283,282 for Terminal Having Illumination and Focus Control filed May 21, 2014 (Liu et al.); 31 pages. |
U.S. Appl. No. 14/619,093 for Methods for Training a Speech Recognition System filed Feb. 11, 2015 (Pecorari); 35 pages. |
U.S. Appl. No. 29/524,186 for Scanner filed Apr. 17, 2015 (Zhou et al.); 17 pages. |
U.S. Appl. No. 14/705,407 for Method and System to Protect Software-Based Network-Connected Devices From Advanced Persistent Threat filed May 6, 2015 (Hussey et al.); 42 pages. |
U.S. Appl. No. 14/614,706 for Device for Supporting an Electronic Tool on a User'S Hand filed Feb. 5, 2015 (Oberpriller et al.); 33 pages. |
U.S. Appl. No. 14/628,708 for Device, System, and Method for Determining the Status of Checkout Lanes filed Feb. 23, 2015 (Todeschini); 37 pages. |
U.S. Appl. No. 14/704,050 for Intermediate Linear Positioning filed May 5, 2015 (Charpentier et al.); 60 pages. |
U.S. Appl. No. 14/529,563 for Adaptable Interface for a Mobile Computing Device filed Oct. 31, 2014 (Schoon et al.); 36 pages. |
U.S. Appl. No. 14/705,012 for Hands-Free Human Machine Interface Responsive to a Driver of a Vehicle filed May 6, 2015 (Fitch et al.); 44 pages. |
U.S. Appl. No. 14/715,672 for Augumented Reality Enabled Hazard Display filed May 19, 2015 (Venkatesha et al.); 35 pages. |
U.S. Appl. No. 14/695,364 for Medication Management System filed Apr. 24, 2015 (Sewell et al.); 44 pages. |
U.S. Appl. No. 14/664,063 for Method and Application for Scanning a Barcode With a Smart Device While Continuously Running and Displaying an Application on the Smart Device Display filed Mar. 20, 2015 (Todeschini); 37 pages. |
U.S. Appl. No. 14/735,717 for Indicia-Reading Systems Having an Interface With a User'S Nervous System filed Jun. 10, 2015 (Todeschini); 39 pages. |
U.S. Appl. No. 14/527,191 for Method and System for Recognizing Speech Using Wildcards in an Expected Response filed Oct. 29, 2014 (Braho et al.); 45 pages. |
U.S. Appl. No. 14/702,110 for System and Method for Regulating Barcode Data Injection Into a Running Application on a Smart Device filed May 1, 2015 (Todeschini et al.); 38 pages. |
U.S. Appl. No. 14/535,764 for Concatenated Expected Responses for Speech Recognition filed Nov. 7, 2014 (Braho et al.); 51 pages. |
U.S. Appl. No. 14/687,289 for System for Communication Via a Peripheral Hub filed Apr. 15, 2015 (Kohtz et al.); 37 pages. |
U.S. Appl. No. 14/747,197 for Optical Pattern Projector filed Jun. 23, 2015 (Thuries et al.); 33 pages. |
U.S. Appl. No. 14/674,329 for Aimer for Barcode Scanning filed Mar. 31, 2015 (Bidwell); 36 pages. |
U.S. Appl. No. 14/702,979 for Tracking Battery Conditions filed May 4, 2015 (Young et al.); 70 pages. |
U.S. Appl. No. 29/529,441 for Indicia Reading Device filed Jun. 8, 2015 (Zhou et al.); 14 pages. |
U.S. Appl. No. 14/747,490 for Dual-Projector Three-Dimensional Scanner filed Jun. 23, 2015 (Jovanovski et al.); 40 pages. |
U.S. Appl. No. 14/740,320 for Tactile Switch for a Mobile Electronic Device filed Jun. 16, 2015 (Barndringa); 38 pages. |
U.S. Appl. No. 14/695,923 for Secure Unattended Network Authentication filed Apr. 24, 2015 (Kubler et al.); 52 pages. |
U.S. Appl. No. 14/740,373 for Calibrating a Volume Dimensioner filed Jun. 16, 2015 (Ackley et al.); 63 pages. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20150339504 A1 | Nov 2015 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 13927398 | Jun 2013 | US |
Child | 14818528 | US |