The present disclosure generally relates to reverse and parking assist systems, and more specifically, to parking assist systems which account for the cognitive load of a driver of a vehicle.
When reversing a vehicle, both the cognitive load on a driver and the collision risk may vary for a number of reasons. For example, when backing a vehicle and/or trailer into a parking space, the driver may need to monitor front corners of the vehicle in addition to the sides and rear of the vehicle to assure there is enough clearance between the vehicle and surrounding objects. In addition, the surrounding objects may also be moving, such as when a bicycle crosses the projected path of the vehicle. The cognitive load of the driver generally increases with vehicle speed due to the heightened situational awareness needed by the driver in order to operate the vehicle at that speed. While there may be perimeter sensing and collision mitigation features in place to warn the driver and stop the vehicle, it may be desirable to limit the speed of the vehicle to help manage the cognitive load of the driver and provide more comfortable collision mitigation when there are distracting conditions that may be competing for the driver's attention. Furthermore, managing the vehicle speed based on sensor activity can help limit the risk of a collision even with an automated driving system in place.
According to one aspect of the present invention, a parking assist system for a vehicle is provided that includes a speed limiting controller configured to set a speed limit for the vehicle during a maneuver; and an audio sensor configured to sense an ambient sound within the vehicle. The speed limiting controller is configured to reduce the speed limit based on the sensing of the ambient sound within the vehicle.
According to another aspect of the present invention, a method for assisting in parking a vehicle is provided that includes the steps of detecting a first distance to a first obstacle using one or more sensors; detecting an ambient sound volume using an audio sensor; detecting environmental conditions external to the vehicle using an environmental sensor; and generating a brake torque request using a speed limiting controller configured to slow the vehicle. The brake torque request is based on the detection of at least one of the first distance to the first obstacle, the ambient sound volume, and the environmental conditions.
According to a further aspect of the present invention, a parking assist system for a vehicle is provided that includes one or more proximity sensors. An audio sensor is configured to sense an ambient sound volume within the vehicle. An environmental sensor is configured to detect environmental conditions. A speed limiting controller is configured to generate a speed limit for the vehicle during a parking maneuver. The controller is configured to reduce the speed limit based on data from the proximity sensors and the audio sensor.
These and other aspects, objects, and features of the present invention will be understood and appreciated by those skilled in the art upon studying the following specification, claims, and appended drawings.
In the drawings:
For purposes of description herein, the terms “upper,” “lower,” “right,” “left,” “rear,” “front,” “vertical,” “horizontal,” “interior,” “exterior,” and derivatives thereof, shall relate to the invention as oriented in
Referring to
Referring now to
Referring now to
Referring now to
During reversing, the cognitive load, or the total amount of mental effort being used in the driver's working memory, may be higher than under normal driving circumstances due to a variety of factors such as the presence and location of collision hazards (e.g., the first and second obstacles O1, O2), ambient noise within a cabin of the vehicle 10, environmental conditions exterior to the vehicle 10 (e.g., weather), as well as a number of other factors. If the cognitive load of the driver is particularly heavy, the driver may fail to properly account for the movement of the vehicle 10, the speed of the vehicle 10, the location of the first and second obstacles O1, O2, or other tasks associated with operating the vehicle 10, which may lead to a collision. Accordingly, systems, such as the parking assist system 14, can include the ability within the speed limiting controller 30 to limit the speed of the vehicle 10 by establishing a speed limit or a reference speed that the vehicle 10 may not move faster than during the reversing or backing. It will be understood that although described herein as a separate dedicated controller, the speed limiting controller 30 may be embodied as a tangible machine readable code, algorithm, program, and/or operating mode of another shared controller present on the vehicle 10 (e.g., anti-lock braking system controller, parking aid module, vehicle controller area network bus, or electronic control unit) without departing from the scope of the disclosure. The speed limit may be originally generated based on a variety of factors such as an angle between the trailer 42 and the vehicle 10, stability of the vehicle 10 (e.g., as measured by yaw rate sensors), a mass of the vehicle 10 and/or the trailer 42, a grade of a road the vehicle 10 and/or trailer 42 is positioned on, parking space location, road grade of the parking space and/or other factors. It will also be understood that the speed limit may not be generated by the speed limiting controller 30, but generated by another controller or module of the parking assist system 14 or vehicle 10, and provided to the speed limiting controller 30, without departing from the spirit of this disclosure.
The speed limiting controller 30 can be configured for speed limiting by the incorporation of a proportional-integral-derivative (“PID”) controller to monitor the difference between the vehicle speed and the speed limit (such difference being designated a speed error). The speed of the vehicle 10 may be measured through wheel count encoders of the brake system 50, GPS tracking, or other conventional methods of measuring the speed of the vehicle 10. In the event the vehicle speed is greater than the speed limit established by the speed limiting controller 30, the speed limiting controller may issue a brake torque request that will be sent to the brake system 50. The brake system 50 in turn applies the brakes appropriately, which alters the vehicle speed and reduces the speed error (i.e. lowering the speed of the vehicle 10). In alternative embodiments, the speed limiting controller 30 may reduce the output of a powertrain of the vehicle 10 separately, or in conjunction with, the brake torque request to slow the vehicle 10 to the speed limit. In some embodiments, the magnitude of the speed error may dictate the magnitude of the brake torque request and whether the speed limiting controller 30 issues the brake torque request with or without the reduction in powertrain output. The speed limiting controller 30 may take a variety of factors into account when issuing the brake torque request and/or the powertrain reduction such as road grade, powertrain output, the speed error and/or the speed limit, and/or the estimated cognitive load of the driver. In the event the vehicle speed is less than the speed limit, no brake torque request is issued by the speed limiting controller 30. For the purposes of speed limiting within a system such as system 14, the desired response is a system that quickly limits the vehicle speed to the speed limit with very little overshoot.
Referring now to
Referring now to
If the difference between the first time to collision T1 and the second time to collision T2 is less than a predetermined tunable value (e.g., 400 milliseconds, 500 milliseconds, 600 milliseconds) then step 116 of calculating an angle α between the first and second obstacles O1, O2 is performed. In various embodiments, the angle α may be measured in a ground plane, or in the same plane as the vehicle 10. Measuring the angle α between the first and second obstacles O1, O2 may help in the estimation of the cognitive load of the driver as an indicator of the severity with which the driver must alter their field of view (i.e. must move their head) in order to observe both the first and second obstacles O1, O2. The greater the angle α, the farther the driver generally must move their head back and forth to keep track of the first and second obstacles O1, O2 thereby increasing their cognitive load. If the angle α is greater than a predetermined tunable value (e.g., 60°, 75°, 90°, or other angle indicative of the driver's field of vision) in addition to the difference between the first time to collision T1 and the second time to collision T2 being greater than the predetermined tunable value, the speed limiting controller 30 may reduce the speed limit by a predetermined amount (e.g., 10%, 15%, 20%).
Referring again to
The speed limiting controller 30 may also be in electrical communication with the environmental sensor 26 such that the speed limiting controller 30 may also take into consideration environmental conditions external to the vehicle 10 in assessing whether or not to reduce the speed limit in step 124. Environmental conditions may increase the cognitive load of the driver due to changes in visibility around the vehicle 10, handling conditions due to wet or frozen ground, and the likelihood of other driver's mistakes. As such, the speed limiting controller 30 may receive data from the environmental sensor 26 indicative of the environmental conditions external to the vehicle 10 and reduce the speed limit of the vehicle 10 accordingly. In various embodiments, the speed limiting controller 30 may reduce the speed limit by a predetermined tunable amount (e.g., 5%, 10%, 12%, 15%, 20%) for conditions affecting handling of the vehicle 10 (e.g., snow or ice present on the ground leading to slippery conditions) and reduce the speed limit by an additional amount (e.g., 5%, 10%, 12%, 15%, 20%) for conditions affecting the driver's visibility. In various embodiments, the reduction of the speed limit based on environmental conditions may be scalable, or proportional, to the severity of the conditions (e.g., dense fog vs. light fog, snowing vs. white out, black ice vs. light snow).
Once the speed limiting controller 30 has taken into account the potential distractions that may increase the cognitive load of the driver and reduced the speed limit of the vehicle 10 accordingly, the speed limiting controller 30 performs step 128 of determining a difference between the vehicle speed and the speed limit. The speed limiting controller 30 compiles the reductions in the speed limit to determine an adjusted speed limit. If the speed of the vehicle 10 is lower than the adjusted speed limit, the speed limiting controller 30 may take no action. If the speed limiting controller 30 determines that the speed of the vehicle 10 is greater than the adjusted speed limit, step 132 of generating a brake torque request is performed. The brake torque request may be based at least in part on the magnitude of the difference between the adjusted speed limit and the vehicle speed, angle between the trailer 42 and the vehicle 10, stability of the vehicle 10 (e.g., as measured by yaw rate sensors), a mass of the vehicle 10 and/or the trailer 42, a grade of a road the vehicle 10 and/or trailer 42 is positioned on, parking space location, road grade of the parking space and/or other factors. The brake torque request is sent to the brake system 50 to slow the vehicle 10.
It will be understood that although the present disclosure was described in connection with reversing and/or parking the vehicle 10 and/or trailer 42, the disclosure may equally be applied to forward motion and/or maneuvers of the vehicle 10 and/or trailer 42 without departing from the scope of this disclosure. Additionally, it will be understood that any and all of the tunable values explained in this disclosure may be tunable or predetermined based on a variety of factors. For example, certain values may be chosen to provide the driver with a greater amount of time before the speed limiting controller 30 or parking assist system 14 intervenes, or values may be chosen to decrease the time before the speed limiting controller 30 or parking assist system 14 intervenes, which may limit the abruptness of action and require less action by the driver. Further, it will be understood that the speed of the vehicle 10 may be reduced additionally or alternatively to the reduction of the speed limit when the speed limiting controller 30 or parking assist system 14 intervene.
It is to be understood that variations and modifications can be made on the aforementioned structure without departing from the concepts of the present invention, and further it is to be understood that such concepts are intended to be covered by the following claims unless these claims by their language expressly state otherwise.
For purposes of this disclosure, the term “coupled” (in all of its forms: couple, coupling, coupled, etc.) generally means the joining of two components (electrical or mechanical) directly or indirectly to one another. Such joining may be stationary in nature or movable in nature. Such joining may be achieved with the two components (electrical or mechanical) and any additional intermediate members being integrally formed as a single unitary body with one another or with the two components. Such joining may be permanent in nature or may be removable or releasable in nature unless otherwise stated.
It is also important to note that the construction and arrangement of the elements of the invention as shown in the exemplary embodiments is illustrative only. Although only a few embodiments of the present innovations have been described in detail in this disclosure, those skilled in the art who review this disclosure will readily appreciate that many modifications are possible (e.g., variations in sizes, dimensions, structures, shapes and proportions of the various elements, values of parameters, mounting arrangements, use of materials, colors, orientations, etc.) without materially departing from the novel teachings and advantages of the subject matter recited. For example, elements shown as integrally formed may be constructed of multiple parts, or elements shown as multiple parts may be integrally formed, the operation of the interfaces may be reversed or otherwise varied, the length or width of the structures and/or members or connector or other elements of the system may be varied, the nature or number of adjustment positions provided between the elements may be varied. It should be noted that the elements and/or assemblies of the system may be constructed from any of a wide variety of materials that provide sufficient strength or durability, in any of a wide variety of colors, textures, and combinations. Accordingly, all such modifications are intended to be included within the scope of the present innovations. Other substitutions, modifications, changes, and omissions may be made in the design, operating conditions, and arrangement of the desired and other exemplary embodiments without departing from the spirit of the present innovations.
It will be understood that any described processes or steps within described processes may be combined with other disclosed processes or steps to form structures within the scope of the present invention. The exemplary structures and processes disclosed herein are for illustrative purposes and are not to be construed as limiting.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
5919241 | Bolourchi et al. | Jul 1999 | A |
6122579 | Collier-Hallman et al. | Jun 2000 | A |
6370459 | Phillips | Apr 2002 | B1 |
6424895 | Shimizu et al. | Jul 2002 | B1 |
6539288 | Ishida et al. | Mar 2003 | B2 |
6580984 | Fecher et al. | Jun 2003 | B2 |
6604592 | Pietsch et al. | Aug 2003 | B2 |
6631781 | Williams et al. | Oct 2003 | B2 |
7039504 | Tanaka et al. | May 2006 | B2 |
7546191 | Lin et al. | Jun 2009 | B2 |
7706944 | Tanaka et al. | Apr 2010 | B2 |
7777615 | Okuda et al. | Aug 2010 | B2 |
7813855 | Watanabe et al. | Oct 2010 | B2 |
7904222 | Lee et al. | Mar 2011 | B2 |
8020657 | Allard et al. | Sep 2011 | B2 |
8139109 | Schmiedel et al. | Mar 2012 | B2 |
8169341 | Toledo et al. | May 2012 | B2 |
8319614 | Takano | Nov 2012 | B2 |
8374749 | Tanaka | Feb 2013 | B2 |
8406956 | Wey et al. | Mar 2013 | B2 |
8427288 | Schofield et al. | Apr 2013 | B2 |
8464829 | Von Tardy-Tuch et al. | Jun 2013 | B2 |
8498770 | Takano | Jul 2013 | B2 |
8521364 | Hueger et al. | Aug 2013 | B2 |
8571758 | Klier et al. | Oct 2013 | B2 |
8626382 | Obradovich | Jan 2014 | B2 |
8645015 | Oetiker et al. | Feb 2014 | B2 |
8755984 | Rupp et al. | Jun 2014 | B2 |
8798860 | Dechamp | Aug 2014 | B2 |
8823796 | Shen et al. | Sep 2014 | B2 |
8825221 | Hueger et al. | Sep 2014 | B2 |
8888120 | Trevino | Nov 2014 | B2 |
8909426 | Rhode et al. | Dec 2014 | B2 |
8948990 | Kobayashi | Feb 2015 | B2 |
9008890 | Herbach | Apr 2015 | B1 |
9043083 | Kadowaki et al. | May 2015 | B2 |
9102271 | Trombley et al. | Aug 2015 | B2 |
9132856 | Shepard | Sep 2015 | B2 |
9174672 | Zeng et al. | Nov 2015 | B2 |
9208686 | Takamatsu | Dec 2015 | B2 |
9229453 | Lee | Jan 2016 | B1 |
9238483 | Hafner et al. | Jan 2016 | B2 |
9248858 | Lavoie et al. | Feb 2016 | B2 |
9305463 | Yellambalase | Apr 2016 | B1 |
9400897 | Bruening et al. | Jul 2016 | B2 |
9429943 | Wilson et al. | Aug 2016 | B2 |
9464913 | Brown et al. | Oct 2016 | B2 |
9520063 | Noh | Dec 2016 | B2 |
9676377 | Hafner | Jun 2017 | B2 |
9836060 | Ghneim et al. | Dec 2017 | B2 |
9840278 | Lavoie et al. | Dec 2017 | B2 |
20050206225 | Offerle et al. | Sep 2005 | A1 |
20060190147 | Lee et al. | Aug 2006 | A1 |
20060244579 | Raab | Nov 2006 | A1 |
20070057816 | Sakakibara et al. | Mar 2007 | A1 |
20070158128 | Gratz | Jul 2007 | A1 |
20080086269 | Joe | Apr 2008 | A1 |
20090079828 | Lee | Mar 2009 | A1 |
20090222202 | Kato | Sep 2009 | A1 |
20120224059 | Takamatsu | Sep 2012 | A1 |
20120271522 | Rupp et al. | Oct 2012 | A1 |
20120283909 | Dix | Nov 2012 | A1 |
20120316732 | Auer | Dec 2012 | A1 |
20130006472 | McClain et al. | Jan 2013 | A1 |
20130103246 | Staack | Apr 2013 | A1 |
20130120161 | Wakabayashi et al. | May 2013 | A1 |
20130229524 | Vovkushevsky et al. | Sep 2013 | A1 |
20130238193 | Bolourchi et al. | Sep 2013 | A1 |
20140121883 | Shen et al. | May 2014 | A1 |
20140121930 | Allexi et al. | May 2014 | A1 |
20140188344 | Lavoie | Jul 2014 | A1 |
20140244095 | Choi et al. | Aug 2014 | A1 |
20140267727 | Alaniz | Sep 2014 | A1 |
20150012202 | Moore et al. | Jan 2015 | A1 |
20150025732 | Min et al. | Jan 2015 | A1 |
20150077557 | Han et al. | Mar 2015 | A1 |
20150158524 | Lee et al. | Jun 2015 | A1 |
20150191200 | Tsubaki et al. | Jul 2015 | A1 |
20150217692 | Yanagawa | Aug 2015 | A1 |
20150232092 | Fairgrieve et al. | Aug 2015 | A1 |
20150251602 | Baur et al. | Sep 2015 | A1 |
20150274202 | Tsunoda et al. | Oct 2015 | A1 |
20150369613 | Stadler | Dec 2015 | A1 |
20160103499 | Yamamoto | Apr 2016 | A1 |
20160207526 | Franz et al. | Jul 2016 | A1 |
20160229452 | Lavoie et al. | Aug 2016 | A1 |
20160301698 | Katara | Oct 2016 | A1 |
20160304088 | Barth | Oct 2016 | A1 |
20160304122 | Herzog et al. | Oct 2016 | A1 |
20160320477 | Heimberger | Nov 2016 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
202541524 | Nov 2012 | CN |
102005043466 | Mar 2007 | DE |
0842841 | May 2002 | EP |
1006042 | Apr 2006 | EP |
1695888 | Aug 2006 | EP |
2213546 | Aug 2010 | EP |
2496298 | May 2013 | GB |
649063 | Jan 1989 | JP |
2002337717 | Nov 2002 | JP |
2003261053 | Sep 2003 | JP |
2009113512 | May 2009 | JP |
201434289 | Feb 2014 | JP |
20060133750 | Dec 2006 | KR |
20110114897 | Apr 2010 | KR |
1020140004411 | Jan 2014 | KR |
1020150038776 | Apr 2015 | KR |
2014092611 | Jun 2014 | WO |
Entry |
---|
SH.Azadi et al., Automatic Parking of an Articulated Vehicle Using ANFIS, Global Journal of Science, Engineering end Technology, GJSET Publishing, 2013, Issue 14, 2013, pp. 93-104. |
Cuesta et al., Intelligent System for Parallel Parking of Cars and Tractor-Trailers, Intelligent Mobile Robot Navigation, STAR 16, Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2006, pp. 159-188. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20170120903 A1 | May 2017 | US |