BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS
Other advantages and features will become more clearly apparent from the following description of particular embodiments of the invention given for non-restrictive example purposes only and represented in the accompanying drawings, in which:
FIGS. 1 to 3 represent a particular embodiment of the invention, respectively in perspective view, in top view and in cross-section seen from below in the plane defined by the two lines A-A and B-B of FIG. 2,
FIG. 4 represents another particular embodiment of the invention, in perspective view.
DESCRIPTION OF A PREFERRED EMBODIMENT OF THE INVENTION
The different types of coils described above can be achieved without necessarily using a magnetic core. Preferably however, the coil envelops a magnetic core.
The coil represented in FIGS. 1 to 3 comprises a plurality of turns 1 separated from one another by a minimum isolating gap 2 separating the adjacent turns 1. The isolating gap 2 is fixed by technological production constraints and the required electromagnetic behavior. The turns 1 form a coil around a magnetic core 3 comprising four parallel branches 11 (11a, 11b, 11c, 11d). The same coil could also be envisaged without a magnetic core or with an open core. The plurality of non-joined turns 1 form a coil around the substantially parallel branches 11 of the magnetic core 3. When this coil is used without a magnetic core, the non-joined turns 1 form a plurality of substantially parallel coil branches.
Each turn 1 comprises a bottom flat section 4 in a bottom plane, a top flat section 5 in a top plane and two rising flat sections 12 and 13. It should be noted that these four elements (the bottom flat section 4, the top flat section 5 and the two rising flat sections 12 and 13) are not joined to one another so as to form a loop, as for example in the case of a conventional solenoid coil. The flat sections 4 and 5 can in fact belong to distinct electrical conductors, each electrical conductor going from the bottom plane for a predetermined branch to the top plane for an adjacent branch and vice-versa. The turns 1 fill almost all of the enveloping surface of the coil, except for the minimum isolating gap 2.
What is meant by enveloping surface of the coil is a continuous surface delineated by the coil and joining the adjacent turns to one another. The enveloping surface of the coil thus includes the turns 1 and the isolating gaps 2. This enveloping surface of the coil has to be filled as far as possible by the turns 1, the isolating gap 2 only serving the purpose of performing electrical isolation between the turns 1. The isolating gaps 2 can moreover be filled with an insulating material.
Thus in FIG. 1, the turns constitute an almost complete envelope of the branches of the magnetic core 3. Unlike devices of the prior art, the micro-inductor uses all the space potentially available for the coil and does not leave any unused space. The micro-inductor thus has a lower resistance for predetermined overall dimensions.
The thickness of the coil is a trade-off between the ease of production and the required resistance level.
The rising sections 12a and 12b of two adjacent branches 11a and 11b arranged between the two adjacent branches 11a and 11b are arranged alternately (12a, 12b, 12a, 12b, . . . ) in a single plane. In the particular embodiment represented in FIG. 1, this single plane is perpendicular to the plane of the magnetic core 3 and passes via the line C-C which passes via the rising sections 12a and 12b. The turns 1 form an almost complete envelope of the branches 11 of the magnetic core, a minimum isolating gap 2 separating the adjacent turns 1.
The turns 1 thus fill almost all the enveloping surface of the coil, the coil being formed by several coil branches, with or without a magnetic core.
On account of their dimensions, the top 5 and bottom 4 sections represent most of the surface of the turns. Thus, whereas the length Lm (FIG. 1) of the rising sections 12 is for example about 20 microns, the length Ls of the bottom 4 and top 5 sections is for example about a few hundred microns. The top 5 and bottom 4 sections preferably have a substantially rectangular shape (see FIGS. 1 to 4), to which connections to the rising sections 12 are added. The top section 5 advantageously has the same dimensions and preferably the same shape as the bottom section 4 corresponding to the same turn 1, and they are preferably aligned with respect to one another. In this way they are completely superposed on one another, i.e. their projections in a plane parallel to the top 5 and bottom 4 sections are the same.
In FIGS. 1 to 3, the top 5 and bottom 4 sections have a larger width than the width of the corresponding rising sections 12a and 12b arranged between two adjacent branches 11a and 11b. The width of the rising sections 12a and 12b arranged between two adjacent branches 11a and 11b is preferably smaller than half of the width of the top 5 and bottom 4 sections to enable the turns to be entangled at the level of the crossings between the turns. The top 5 and bottom 4 sections therefore have a larger width than the sum of the widths of the corresponding rising sections 12 arranged between two adjacent coil branches. Advantageously the rising sections 12a and 12b have the same surface.
The rising sections 13 arranged outside an external branch 11a of the micro-inductor can present the same width as the top 5 and bottom 4 sections of the corresponding turns 1 of the same branch 11a.
In FIGS. 1 to 3, the top 5 and bottom 4 sections of each turn 1 corresponding to the branch 11a (on the right of FIG. 1) are joined by the rising sections 13 arranged on the outside. The top 5 and bottom 4 sections of each turn 1 corresponding to the branch 11d at the other end of the core 3 (on the left of FIG. 1) are joined by the rising sections 12c arranged between the adjacent branches 11c and 11d. Two adjacent turns corresponding to the branch 11d at the end of the core 3 (represented on the left of FIG. 1) are joined by a rising section 12d arranged on the outside and a connecting section 14 arranged in the bottom plane corresponding to the bottom sections 4.
Dimensioning of this coil can be performed in the following manner illustrated in FIG. 2. The length C of the magnetic core is defined. All the branches of the core will be considered to have the same width WMAG. The technological and electrical constraints fix the dimensions V of the rising sections 12, the distance between turns INT and the separating distance M between the coil and the magnetic circuit. It should be noted that FIG. 2 is not to scale and that the distance M is therefore variable in FIG. 2. The distance between two adjacent turns INT corresponds to the minimum isolating gap 2. The distance between the branches I must be at least I=V+2*M. The coil can then be completely defined. The number of turns per branch N (five in FIG. 2) is determined by the required inductance level. The width WMAX of the top 5 and bottom 4 sections is calculated by means of the formula WMAX=(C−2*WMAG−(N−1)*INT−2M)/N. The width WMIN of the rising sections 12 is calculated by means of the formula WMIN=(WMAX−INT)/2. The thickness of conducting material is finally fixed as a trade-off between ease of production and the required resistance level.
A micro-inductor with a substantially annular closed magnetic core 3 only two parallel branches 11 whereof are covered by a coil forming an almost total envelope of the two branches 11 is illustrated in FIG. 4. The same type of coil as the one described above can be used.
The particular embodiment enables the performances of inductive systems to be improved and in particular enables the inductance of the micro-inductor and the compactness of the coil to be increased.
In the particular embodiment described, the turns form an almost complete envelope of the magnetic core over the whole of the parallel branches of the multi-branch core. Only the minimum isolating gaps 2 separate the bottom flat sections 4 of two adjacent turns, the top flat sections 5 of two adjacent turns and two adjacent rising sections. The minimum isolating gap 2 depends on the manufacturing technology used and on the electromagnetic constraints. The gap between turns does not exceed the minimum isolating gap 2.
For integrated components using conventional microfabrication techniques, the two alternative embodiments do not present any additional fabrication difficulties compared with already existing conventional systems. For example, the top 5 and bottom 4 sections can respectively be etched in conducting layers.
Patent Application
20080094165
