The invention relates to a coil comprising a plurality of non-joined turns forming a plurality of substantially parallel coil branches, each turn comprising a rectangular bottom flat section in a bottom plane, a rectangular top flat section in a top plane and two rising sections, the rising sections of two adjacent branches arranged between the two adjacent branches being arranged alternately in a single plane.
The invention relates to the field of integrated micro-inductors for power electronics applications. It can, in a more general manner, apply to all inductive systems, either integrated or not (inductors, transformers, magnetic recording heads, actuators, sensors, etc . . . ) requiring a high electric power density.
Micro-inductors of various types have existed for a number of years. However, discrete components remain for the most part essentially used in applications using high power densities, as only this kind of component enable very thick coil wires to be used enabling very low electric resistance levels to be achieved. Most of the micro-inductors used on the market are discrete components manufactured by micro-mechanical methods of micro-machining, sticking, micro-winding, etc . . . . These methods are heavy to implement, require individual treatment, are far from flexible in terms of design, and greatly limit miniaturization of the power circuits. In particular, the thickness of the discrete micro-inductors (typically greater than 0.5 mm) does not enable the power supply circuits currently used for mobile telephony, for example, to be suitably incorporated in a chip.
The manufacturing techniques used in microelectronics provide a much greater flexibility as far as implementing different designs is concerned, enable collective treatment to be performed, and are compatible with the idea of miniaturization, as the thickness (substrate included) can easily be less than 300 μm. However, they are not suitable for depositions of large thicknesses (greater than 10 μm) of magnetic or dielectric conducting materials and for etching of these materials after photolithography.
For integrated components, technological manufacturing constraints constitute a limitation. Indeed, depositing conducting layers having a thickness of more than 100 micrometers is not for the moment envisageable in a standard industrial process.
Toroidal solenoid type micro-inductors present a good trade-off between inductance losses and level as they come close to the ideal case of the infinite solenoid.
The article “Numerical Inductor Optimization” by A. von der Weth et al. (Trans. Magn. Soc. Japan, Vol. 2, No. 5, pp. 361-366, 2002) describes a micro-inductor with an open magnetic circuit composed of a plurality of parallelepipedic cores. A plurality of turns not joined to one another forms a coil around the branches of the magnetic core. Each turn comprises a bottom flat section in a bottom plane, a top flat section in a top plane, and two rising flat sections. The rising sections of two adjacent branches arranged between the two adjacent branches are arranged alternately in a single plane, which enables a small spacing to be obtained between two adjacent branches, thereby enabling the compactness of the device to be increased. For these devices, it is sought to increase the inductance level and to minimize losses.
The object of the invention consists in improving the performances of a micro-inductor while at the same time increasing the compactness of the micro-inductor.
According to the invention, this object is achieved by a coil according to the appended claims and more particularly by the fact that the top and bottom sections corresponding to one and the same turn being aligned with respect to one another and having a larger width than the width of the corresponding rising sections arranged between two adjacent coil branches, the turns fill almost all of the enveloping surface of the coil, a minimum isolating gap separating the adjacent turns.
Other advantages and features will become more clearly apparent from the following description of particular embodiments of the invention given for non-restrictive example purposes only and represented in the accompanying drawings, in which:
The different types of coils described above can be achieved without necessarily using a magnetic core. Preferably however, the coil envelops a magnetic core.
The coil represented in
Each turn 1 comprises a bottom flat section 4 in a bottom plane, a top flat section 5 in a top plane and two rising flat sections 12 and 13. It should be noted that these four elements (the bottom flat section 4, the top flat section 5 and the two rising flat sections 12 and 13) are not joined to one another so as to form a loop, as for example in the case of a conventional solenoid coil. The flat sections 4 and 5 can in fact belong to distinct electrical conductors, each electrical conductor going from the bottom plane for a predetermined branch to the top plane for an adjacent branch and vice-versa. The turns 1 fill almost all of the enveloping surface of the coil, except for the minimum isolating gap 2.
What is meant by enveloping surface of the coil is a continuous surface delineated by the coil and joining the adjacent turns to one another. The enveloping surface of the coil thus includes the turns 1 and the isolating gaps 2. This enveloping surface of the coil has to be filled as far as possible by the turns 1, the isolating gap 2 only serving the purpose of performing electrical isolation between the turns 1. The isolating gaps 2 can moreover be filled with an insulating material.
Thus in
The thickness of the coil is a trade-off between the ease of production and the required resistance level.
The rising sections 12a and 12b of two adjacent branches 11a and 11b arranged between the two adjacent branches 11a and 11b are arranged alternately (12a, 12b, 12a, 12b, . . . ) in a single plane. In the particular embodiment represented in
The turns 1 thus fill almost all the enveloping surface of the coil, the coil being formed by several coil branches, with or without a magnetic core.
On account of their dimensions, the top 5 and bottom 4 sections represent most of the surface of the turns. Thus, whereas the length Lm (
In
The rising sections 13 arranged outside an external branch 11a of the micro-inductor can present the same width as the top 5 and bottom 4 sections of the corresponding turns 1 of the same branch 11a.
In
Dimensioning of this coil can be performed in the following manner illustrated in
A micro-inductor with a substantially annular closed magnetic core 3 only two parallel branches 11 whereof are covered by a coil forming an almost total envelope of the two branches 11 is illustrated in
The particular embodiment enables the performances of inductive systems to be improved and in particular enables the inductance of the micro-inductor and the compactness of the coil to be increased.
In the particular embodiment described, the turns form an almost complete envelope of the magnetic core over the whole of the parallel branches of the multi-branch core. Only the minimum isolating gaps 2 separate the bottom flat sections 4 of two adjacent turns, the top flat sections 5 of two adjacent turns and two adjacent rising sections. The minimum isolating gap 2 depends on the manufacturing technology used and on the electromagnetic constraints. The gap between turns does not exceed the minimum isolating gap 2.
For integrated components using conventional microfabrication techniques, the two alternative embodiments do not present any additional fabrication difficulties compared with already existing conventional systems. For example, the top 5 and bottom 4 sections can respectively be etched in conducting layers.
Number | Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
06 09274 | Oct 2006 | FR | national |
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
2709791 | Anderson | May 1955 | A |
3798959 | Astle et al. | Mar 1974 | A |
4810989 | Brandenberg et al. | Mar 1989 | A |
5939966 | Shin'Ei | Aug 1999 | A |
6114937 | Burghartz et al. | Sep 2000 | A |
6147584 | Shin'el | Nov 2000 | A |
6367143 | Sugimura | Apr 2002 | B1 |
6380727 | Jitaru | Apr 2002 | B1 |
6833781 | Padmanabhan et al. | Dec 2004 | B1 |
7194799 | Liang et al. | Mar 2007 | B2 |
20070008058 | Hashimoto | Jan 2007 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
101 04 648 | Jan 2002 | DE |
58137206 | Aug 1983 | JP |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20080094165 A1 | Apr 2008 | US |