Coil tubing winding tool

Information

  • Patent Grant
  • 6435447
  • Patent Number
    6,435,447
  • Date Filed
    Thursday, February 24, 2000
    24 years ago
  • Date Issued
    Tuesday, August 20, 2002
    22 years ago
Abstract
A winding tool operating in conjunction with a level wind spools coiled tubing in a helical pattern onto a reel. In one embodiment, the winding tool includes a plurality of rollers that are urged against the winds of coiled tubing with a biasing member. A driver provides controlled oscillatory translational movement for the rollers.
Description




CROSS-REFERENCE TO RELATED APPLICATIONS




Not Applicable.




STATEMENT REGARDING FEDERALLY SPONSORED RESEARCH OR DEVELOPMENT




Not Applicable.




BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION




1. Field of the Invention




The present invention relates generally to devices used to spool composite coiled tubing. More particularly, the present invention relates to devices that engage composite coiled tubing during the spooling process. Still more particularly, the present invention relates to devices that compressively engage a winding of composite coiled tubing that is being spooled onto a reel. Still more particularly, the present invention relates to devices that oscillate axially to compressively engage consecutive windings of composite coiled tubing that are being spooled onto a reel. Another feature of the present invention relates to methods of spooling composite coiled tubing onto a reel in an even helical layer.




2. Description of the Related Art




Coiled tubing, as currently deployed in the oilfield industry, generally includes small diameter cylindrical tubing made of metal or composites that have a relatively thin cross sectional thickness. Coiled tubing is typically much more flexible and much lighter than conventional drill string. These characteristics of coiled tubing have led to its use in various well operations. Coiled tubing is introduced into the oil or gas well bore through wellhead control equipment to perform various tasks during the exploration, drilling, production, and workover of a well. For example, coiled tubing is routinely utilized to inject gas or other fluids into the well bore, inflate or activate bridges and packers, transport well logging tools downhole, perform remedial cementing and clean-out operations in the well bore, and to deliver drilling tools downhole. The flexible, lightweight nature of coiled tubing makes it particularly useful in deviated well bores.




Conventional coiled tubing handling systems typically include a reel assembly, a tubing injector head, and steel coiled tubing. The reel assembly stores and dispenses tubing and typically includes a cradle for supporting the reel, a rotating reel for storing and retaining the steel coiled tubing, a drive motor to rotate the reel, and a rotary coupling attached to the reel for the injection of gas or liquids into the steel coiled tubing. The tubing injector head pays out and takes up the steel coiled tubing from the borehole.




While prior art coiled tubing handling systems are satisfactory for coiled tubing made of metals such as steel, these systems do not take advantage of beneficial properties inherent in coiled tubing made of composites. One such property is that composite coiled tubing is significantly lighter than steel coiled tubing of similar dimensions. Another useful property is that composites are highly resistant to fatigue failure, which is often a concern with steel coiled tubing. These unique characteristics of composites markedly increase the operational reach of drill string made-up with composite coiled tubing. Thus, composite coiled tubing may allow well completions and workovers to depths previously not easily achieved by other methods. However, these dramatic improvements in drilling operations require handling systems that efficiently and cost-effectively deploy extended lengths of composite coiled tubing.




At the same time, prior art steel coiled tubing handling systems do not adequately address the unique problems inherent with composite coiled tubing. For example, the handling of composite coiled tubing is often complicated by a problem known as “snaking.” Snaking occurs when composite coiled tubing is reeled back onto the spool following a trip downhole. Snaking is defined as an undesired non-uniform coiling of the tubing upon the spool assembly so that the organized fashion in which the tubing is preferred to be stored is disrupted and use of the reel storage space is no longer maximized. The tendency of composite coiled tubing to “snake” appears to be caused by non-uniformities in the composite material, which in turn may be attributable to variances in the manufacturing process. Snaking on the reel can lead to the tubing becoming tangled during successive deployment operations, thereby increasing process time and cost of service.




Prior art coil tubing handling systems often include a level wind that travels back and forth longitudinally along a reel during spooling. While a level wind may initially align the composite coiled tubing in a smooth wrap, the tension in the spooled composite tubing may be insufficient to maintain the smooth wrap. In such situations, the composite coiled tubing may jump, leading all subsequent wraps to fall into a highly undesirable sinusoidal wrapping pattern.




Prior art steel coiled tubing systems also use stationary mechanical restraints in certain applications. An exemplary mechanical restraint includes a stationary wide compliant roller mounted on a hydraulic piston. The compliant roller presses against the outer layer of steel coiled tubing to prevent the steel coiled tubing from spiraling or unwinding off of the reel. This system is somewhat effective for steel tubing, because steel coiled tubing tends to unwind from the reel to release the considerable potential energy gained when the steel coiled tubing is bent to conform to the contour of the reel.




In contrast, composite coiled tubing does not exhibit as great a tendency to spiral or unwind in a similar fashion because composite coiled tubing is relatively more flexible than steel coiled tubing and thus requires much less energy to bend. Instead, coil tubing tends to kink, or shorten in length when placed on the reel without back-tension. Accordingly, devices that tend to resist only spiraling or unwinding do not adequately address the susceptibility of composite coiled tubing to unpredictable non-uniform movement.




A manual procedure to prevent snaking of composite tubing can be tedious and time-consuming. The take up process must be performed slowly and with much care and supervision. Because a faster take up process saves time and money, there is a need for a handling system that minimizes the effects of snaking. While oil and gas recovery operations could greatly benefit from coil handling systems capable of handling long lengths of coiled tubing made of composite and other similar material, the prior art does not disclose such handling systems.




SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION




The present invention features a winding tool that maintains the ordered pattern of windings of composite coiled tubing as the tubing is spooled onto a reel. The winding tool includes a guide, a biasing member, a base, and a driver. Soon after a winding is spooled onto the reel, the biasing member urges the guide against the previous winding so as to prevent undesired movement of the winding. The biasing member is mounted on a base that is propelled by the driver in a oscillatory fashion along the axis of the reel. Optionally, the base may be adapted to ride on a track that provides stability during movement.




In another embodiment, the winding tool features a frame, a guide and a biasing member. The frame includes a lead screw on which the guide is threadedly mounted. The frame also includes a belt arrangement for transferring rotational movement to the lead screw. Rotation of the lead screw propels the guide in oscillatory translational movement. The guide has a plurality of rollers having arcuate surfaces adapted to receive the windings of composite coiled tubing. The biasing member connects with the frame and thereby ultimately urges the guide against the windings.




Thus, the present invention comprises a combination of features and advantages that enable it to overcome various shortcomings of prior art coiled tubing handling devices. The various characteristics described above, as well as other features, will be readily apparent to those skilled in the art upon reading the following detailed description of the preferred embodiments of the invention, and by referring to the accompanying drawings.











BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS




For a more detailed description of the preferred embodiment of the present invention, reference will now be made to the accompanying drawings, wherein:





FIG. 1

illustrates a coiled tubing reel arrangement featuring an embodiment of the present invention;





FIG. 2

is a side view of an embodiment of the present invention;





FIG. 3

is a partial sectional view of the

FIG. 2

embodiment of the present invention;





FIG. 4

is a side view of first alternative embodiment of the present invention;





FIG. 5

is a side view of an alternate driver/base of the

FIG. 4

embodiment of the present invention;





FIG. 6

is a side view of a second alternative embodiment of the present invention; and





FIG. 7

is a Partial cutaway view of a reel arrangement using an embodiment of the present invention.











DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE PREFERRED EMBODIMENT




Referring now to

FIG. 1

, a preferred winding tool


10


is shown as a part of a system including coiled tubing


12


, a reel


14


, a cradle


16


, and a level-wind


18


. Coiled tubing


12


, as used hereinafter, refers to flexible tubular members made of composite material or any other material that exhibits a tendency to jump or snake when spooled onto reel


14


. Composite tubulars are discussed in U.S. application Ser. No. 09/081,981, entitled “Well System,” filed on May 20, 1998, which is hereby incorporated by reference for all purposes.




Cradle


16


is a conventional support structure for reel


14


and may include auxiliary connections and equipment such as are known in the art (not shown). Reel


14


is rotatably disposed within cradle


16


and may be capable of storing thousands of feet of coiled tubing


12


and thus may be several feet in diameter. A design for a transportable reel


14


is discussed in U.S. application Ser. No. 09/502,317, filed Feb. 2, 2000 and entitled “Coiled Tubing Handling Systems and Methods” which is hereby incorporated by reference for all purposes. Cradle


16


includes an axle (not shown) that engages reel


14


. Axle and reel


14


are preferably rotated by a motive force such as an electric motor coupled to a belt drive or a hydraulic drive.




Typically, the operation of reel


14


and an associated tubing injector (not shown) are coordinated in order to pay out and retrieve coiled tubing


12


. When coil tubing


12


is being spooled onto reel


14


, it is preferred that it produce even layers of helical windings. For purposes of this discussion, “spool” or “spooling” refers to the process of rotating a reel


14


to draw in coiled tubing


12


. A “winding” or “windings” refers to a length of coiled tubing


12


that has been disposed on reel


14


by rotation of reel


14


. Windings are generally designated with numeral


20


. Each winding


20


is initially positioned on reel


14


in an orderly helical fashion by level-wind


18


. As is well known in the art, level-wind


18


includes a drive mechanism that provides controlled translational movement along a line parallel to the axis of reel


14


. The mechanism includes a self-actuating switch that reverses the direction of travel once the axial ends of reel


14


are reached. Thus, during operation, level-wind


18


moves in an oscillatory translational fashion.




The designs of cradles, reels and level-winds are generally known in the art and will be apparent to one of ordinary skill in the art. Accordingly, the particulars of their designs will not be discussed in detail.




Referring now to

FIG. 2

, winding tool


10


engages and compresses each winding


20


formed by level-wind


18


(

FIG. 1

) and the rotation of reel


14


. A preferred winding tool


10


includes a track


100


, a driver


110


, a base


120


, a tubing guide


130


and a biasing member


140


. As coiled tubing is spooled onto reel


14


in an orderly fashion by level-wind


18


(FIG.


1


), guide


130


bears on the newly-laid winding


20


and prevents it from snaking.




Referring now to

FIG. 3

, track


100


stabilizes the movement of base


120


. According to one embodiment, track


100


preferably includes four rails


102


arranged in a stacked paired fashion and surrounding a lead screw


112


. Rails


102


may comprise solid steel dowels or rods. Alternatively, rails


102


may comprise hollow tubular members. It will be understood that a particular application may demand more than four rails


102


or may require less than four rails


102


. Further, although a circular cross-section has been shown for rails


102


, it will be understood that generally squared configurations or other cross-sectional configurations may be employed just as easily. It will also be understood that during operation, base


120


will impose bending moments and shearing forces on rails


102


. Thus, the materials selection and design should account for the particular stresses and tensions and other forces that may be encountered during operation. Indeed, such analyses may indicate that rails


102


may be eliminated altogether if it is found that driver


110


(

FIG. 2

) provides sufficient support for base


120


.




Referring still to

FIG. 3

, base


120


rides on driver


110


and provides structural support for guide


130


during operation. Base


120


preferably includes a chassis


122


, eight wheels


124


and four axles


126


. Chassis


122


includes a threaded bore


128


adapted to receive lead screw


112


. Thus, rotation of lead screw


112


is converted into controlled translational movement of base


120


. Axles


126


are disposed in an outboard fashion on chassis


122


. Each axle


134


supports two wheels


124


adapted to ride on track rails


102


during translational movement. It should be understood that more or fewer wheels


124


may be used, or that a roller-shaped wheel or any other suitable translatable support device may be substituted for wheels


124


. Alternatively, chassis


122


may utilize sleeves in lieu of some or all wheels


124


. Indeed, nearly any arrangement that provides stability for base


120


during translational movement may be satisfactorily employed.




Referring again to

FIG. 2

, driver


110


rotates lead screw


112


about its axis to propel base


120


at a predetermined rate of travel. Lead screw


112


is disposed parallel to the axis of reel


14


and provides travel along a distance substantially equal to the full length of reel


14


. The rate of travel may be defined as an axial distance per one rotation of reel


14


. Typically, the rate of travel will correspond to the gage diameter of coiled tubing


12


spooled on reel


14


. Thus, for 2⅞ inch gauge composite tubing, it is expected that the rate of travel should be 2⅞ inch per rotation of reel


14


. By taking into account the threads per inch of driver


110


, the rotational speed of reel


14


, the diameters of the several linked components, the necessary rate of travel can be established. It will be seen that such a rate of travel allows base


120


to smoothly follow each successive winding


20


formed during the spooling process. It will be understood that a lead screw having a threaded surface is only one of numerous arrangements suitable for providing an oscillatory driving force for base


120


. Devices such as indexed ratcheting mechanisms or conveyor-type arrangements using belts or cables may also prove satisfactory. Thus, the use of a lead screw in the present embodiment is only exemplary and is not intended to be limiting.




Driver


110


preferably provides rotation of lead screw


112


via a mechanical link


113


with the motive force used to rotate reel


14


. Moreover, driver


110


preferably shares or utilizes the same travel reversing mechanism used by level-wind


18


in order to provide oscillatory travel. Such an arrangement may facilitate the coordination of the movements of level-wind


18


and driver


110


.




Referring now to

FIG. 4

, guide


130


retains for coiled tubing


12


in order to prevent kinking or snaking and maintain helical layering during the spooling process. Guide


130


includes a frame


132


, an axle


134


, and a plurality of rollers


136


. Frame


132


may be fashioned as a U bracket with axle


134


disposed therein. In one embodiment, three rollers


136


are rotatably mounted onto axle


134


. Rollers


136


may be formed from any material suited to well rig applications such as steel, elastomers or natural rubber. Each roller


136


preferably includes a concave surface


138


for seating coiled tubing


12


. The contour of concave surface


138


is substantially similar to the exterior shape of coiled tubing


12


in order to closely receive windings


20


of coiled tubing


12


as it is being spooled onto reel


14


. Rollers


136


may be fixably connected to each other or may be allowed to rotate independently on axle


134


. Alternatively, a single roller incorporating a plurality of concave surfaces adapted to receive consecutive windings of coiled tubing


12


may be used. Moreover, it should be understood that rollers


136


need not incorporate any form of contoured surfaces. Any configuration that provides a surface capable of maintaining coiled tubing


12


in a helical layer is suitable for guide


130


.




Referring still to

FIG. 4

, biasing member


140


urges guide


130


against the windings


20


of coiled tubing


12


so as to radially compress windings


20


against reel


14


. Guide


130


moves radially outward in order to accommodate the growing circumferential size of coiled tubing windings


20


spooled onto reel


14


. Biasing member


140


is interposed between guide frame


132


and base


120


to regulate the radially outward movement of guide


130


. Preferably, biasing member


140


is provided as a piston cylinder arrangement. Alternatively, the biasing mechanism may be a mechanical spring or a fluid chamber that provides hydraulic pressure. Biasing member


140


may be integral with base


120


or attached to base


120


using a threaded connection or other suitable connection means. Further, biasing member


140


may be configured to provide a constant spring force throughout the spooling process or an increasing or decreasing spring force. The precise spring force required to retain the windings will depend on the particular application. Generally, the spring force should be sufficiently high to minimize the undesired movement of coiled tubing


12


on reel


14


. However, the spring force should not be so high as to inhibit the spooling operation or damage coiled tubing


12


.




It should be understood that there are numerous arrangements and variations that may be provided for winding tool


10


. For example, referring now to

FIG. 5

, an alternate track


200


and base


210


are shown. In this embodiment, track


200


includes two rails


204


. Base


210


includes a threaded bore


212


to receive lead screw


112


and two bores


214


,


216


to receive track rails


204


. Thus, in this arrangement, base


210


is propelled axially by the interaction between lead screw


112


and threaded bore


212


and is stabilized by the interaction between the bores


214


,


216


and rails


204


.




Referring now to

FIG. 6

, another embodiment of the present invention is shown. Here, winding tool


10


includes a guide


300


, a driver


310


and a biasing member


330


. Guide


300


includes a pair of rollers


302


having arcuate surfaces


304


for receiving successive windings


20


of coiled tubing


12


. While two rollers


302


are shown, more or fewer rollers may be used. Driver


310


includes a housing


312


and a lead screw


314


. Guide rollers


302


are threadedly disposed on lead screw


314


. Lead screw


314


engages a drive disk


316


via a belt


318


. Drive disk


316


connects to an external rotator (not shown). Biasing member


330


is preferably mounted on a platform


320


and urges guide


300


against windings


20


of coiled tubing


12


. It will be appreciated that the

FIG. 6

embodiment provides a winding tool


10


with a high degree of portability and interchangeability.




Referring now to

FIG. 7

, winding tool


10


preferably engages a newly spooled winding


20


at a location most susceptible to snaking or other undesirable movement. Reel


14


may be described as having first, second, third and fourth quadrants Q


1


,Q


2


,Q


3


,Q


4


. During normal spooling operations, the level-wind (not shown) directs coiled tubing


12


to generally the fourth quadrant Q


4


of reel


14


. Back tension in coiled tubing


12


tends to diminish the likelihood of snaking as coil tubing proceeds through first quadrant Q


1


of reel


14


. However, the tendency of coiled tubing


12


to snake usually manifests itself as coiled tubing


12


proceeds through the second and third quadrants Q


2


, Q


3


of reel


14


. The transition point between the second and third quadrants Q


2


, Q


3


is often referred to as the “belly” of reel


14


. Accordingly, winding tool


10


is preferably installed proximate to the belly of reel


14


in order to eliminate the snaking of coiled tubing


12


in that region. However, such a location for winding tool


10


is not critical to satisfactory operation. Factors such as safety, space and maintenance requirements or a different spooling technique may require that the winding tool


10


be oriented in another manner. Likewise, it may be ascertained during field use that installing winding tool


10


a location other than the belly of reel


14


provides satisfactory performance. Thus, it is seen that winding tool


10


may be adapted to nearly any spooling system.




During use, the reel is rotated in a manner such that the coiled tubing is withdrawn from the borehole. The coiled tubing is guided by the level-wind into a specific area on the reel. As the level-wind travels along the axis of the reel, the level-wind deposits windings of coiled tubing in a helical pattern. As consecutive windings of coiled tubing are directed onto the reel by the level-wind, the rollers of the winding tool urge the newly spooled windings of the coiled tubing against the reel. The pressure provided by the roller prevents the newly placed winding from jumping or otherwise deforming from the desired helical pattern. The winding tool follows along with the level-wind to assist in maintaining the tight helical pattern for each newly spooled layer of tubing. For much of the spooling process, the action of the roller and level-wind may sometimes be automatic. However, when the level-wind and the rollers reach the furthest extent of axial travel along the reel, it may be preferable to have a manual override for human control of the winding process.




While preferred embodiments of this invention have been shown and described, modifications thereof can be made by one skilled in the art without departing from the spirit or teaching of this invention. The embodiments described herein are exemplary only and are not limiting. Many variations and modifications of the system and apparatus are possible and are within the scope of the invention. Accordingly, the scope of protection is not limited to the embodiments described herein, but is only limited by the claims which follow, the scope of which shall include all equivalents of the subject matter of the claims.



Claims
  • 1. A winding tool for a reel receiving consecutive windings of composite coiled tubing that is susceptible to snaking, the winding tool comprising:a guide positioned proximate to the reel and adapted to seat against at least one winding of coiled tubing and applied both an axial and a radial force to said at least one winding; a biasing member urging said guide against the reel; and a driver associated with said guide, said driver providing oscillatory translational movement for said guide.
  • 2. The winding tool of claim 1 wherein said guide comprises a roller, said roller including a concave surface for seating a winding of composite coiled tubing.
  • 3. The winding tool of claim 1 wherein said biasing member comprises a hydraulic piston.
  • 4. The winding tool of claim 1 wherein said driver moves said guide a distance equivalent to the diameter of the coiled tubing per one reel rotation.
  • 5. The winding tool of claim 1 wherein said driver comprises a threaded lead screw and said guide includes a threaded bore for threadedly engaging said threaded lead screw.
  • 6. The winding tool of claim 1 further comprising a level-wind, said level-wind placing a winding of coiled tubing at a desired location on the reel prior to said guide seating against the winding of coiled tubing.
  • 7. The winding tool of claim 6 wherein said driver movement is coordinated with the operation of said level-wind.
  • 8. A winding tool for a reel adapted to spool composite coiled tubing, the winding tool comprising:a guide having frame, an axle disposed within said frame, and a plurality of rollers rotatably mounted on said axle; a biasing member urging said guide against the reel, said biasing member having a top portion secured to said guide frame and a bottom portion; a base connected to said biasing member bottom portion; and a driver engaging said base, said driver providing oscillatory translational movement for said base.
  • 9. The winding tool of claim 8 wherein said rollers include a concave surface.
  • 10. The winding tool of claim 8 wherein said biasing member comprises a hydraulic piston.
  • 11. The winding tool of claim 8, further comprising a level-wind, said level-wind placing a winding of coiled tubing at a desired location on the reel, said driver and said level-wind having coordinated translational movement.
  • 12. A winding tool for a reel adapted to spool composite coiled tubing, the winding tool comprising:a guide having frame, an axle disposed within said frame, and a plurality of rollers rotatably mounted on said axle; a biasing member urging said guide against the reel, said biasing member having a top portion secured to said guide frame and a bottom portion; a base connected to said biasing member bottom portion; and a driver engaging said base, said driver providing oscillatory translational movement for said base, wherein said base comprises a threaded bore and said driver comprises a threaded lead screw adapted to engage said base threaded bore.
  • 13. A winding tool for a reel adapted to spool composite coiled tubing, the winding tool comprising:a guide having frame, an axle disposed within said frame, and a plurality of rollers rotatably mounted on said axle; a biasing member urging said guide against the reel, said biasing member having a top portion secured to said guide frame and a bottom portion; a base connected to said biasing member bottom portion; and a driver engaging said base, said driver providing oscillatory translational movement for said base, further comprising at least one rail disposed co-axially with said driver, wherein said base rides on said rail.
  • 14. The winding tool of claim 13 wherein said base includes at least one wheel adapted to ride on said rail.
  • 15. A method for spooling coiled tubing onto a reel where the composite coiled tubing is susceptible to undesirable movement, comprising:(a) rotating the reel; (b) directing coiled tubing onto the reel to form a plurality of consecutive windings; (c) restraining subsequent movement of the windings on the reel by applying a compressive force and an axial force against the winding of coiled tubing, said compressive force being normal to the axis of the reel and said axial force being parallel to the axis of the reel; and (d) moving the application of the compressive force along a line parallel to the axis of the reel.
  • 16. The method of claim 15 wherein the compressive force of step (c) is applied on each winding for at least one reel revolution.
  • 17. The method of claim 15 wherein step (b) is performed using a level-wind that oscillates along the axis of the reel.
  • 18. The method of claim 17 wherein step (c) is performed by a roller urging the winding against the reel, and wherein step (d) is accomplished by moving the roller.
  • 19. The method of claim 18 wherein the movement of the roller of step (d) is coordinated with the movement of the level-wind of step (b).
  • 20. A system for deploying and retrieving composite coiled tubing in a well bore, the system comprising:a platform positioned proximate to the well bore; a reel disposed on said platform; a span of composite coiled tubing having a first end fixed to said reel, and a subsurface portion disposed in the well bore; a level-wind for directing the subsurface composite coiled tubing to a specific area on said reel during retrieval, said level-wind directing said composite coiled tubing such that said composite coiled tubing spools in helical layers; a guide applying a compressive force against the composite coiled tubing on the reel during retrieval; and a driver associated with said guide, said driver providing oscillatory axial movement for said guide.
  • 21. The system of claim 20 wherein said guide includes a roller engaging the composite coiled tubing.
  • 22. The system of claim 21 wherein said guide includes a biasing member urging said roller against the composite coiled tubing.
  • 23. The system of claim 22 wherein the driver movement is coordinated with the operation of said level-wind.
US Referenced Citations (33)
Number Name Date Kind
1307526 Tuttle Jun 1919 A
1973446 Rosenquist Sep 1934 A
2058150 Hayward et al. Jul 1936 A
2872130 Nardone Feb 1959 A
3559905 Palynchuk Feb 1971 A
3841407 Bozeman Oct 1974 A
4057202 Carr, Jr. Nov 1977 A
4063691 Bacvarov Dec 1977 A
4148445 Reynolds et al. Apr 1979 A
4202512 Nicholson, Jr. May 1980 A
4213724 Holderness Jul 1980 A
4454999 Woodruff Jun 1984 A
4649954 Dunwoody Mar 1987 A
4795108 Appling Jan 1989 A
4895316 Salloum Jan 1990 A
5002238 Inhofer et al. Mar 1991 A
5242129 Bailey et al. Sep 1993 A
5285204 Sas-Jaworsky Feb 1994 A
5289845 Sipos et al. Mar 1994 A
5469916 Sas-Jaworsky et al. Nov 1995 A
5564637 Berthold et al. Oct 1996 A
5605305 Picton Feb 1997 A
5735482 Kuzik Apr 1998 A
5738173 Burge et al. Apr 1998 A
5823267 Burge et al. Oct 1998 A
5839514 Gipson Nov 1998 A
5865392 Blount et al. Feb 1999 A
5908049 Williams et al. Jun 1999 A
5913337 Williams et al. Jun 1999 A
5988702 Sas-Jaworsky Nov 1999 A
6065540 Thomeer et al. May 2000 A
6264128 Shampine et al. Jul 2001 B1
6290166 Aramaki et al. Sep 2001 B1
Foreign Referenced Citations (2)
Number Date Country
0911483 Apr 1999 EP
55-145968 Nov 1980 JP
Non-Patent Literature Citations (1)
Entry
Alexander Sas-Jaworsky, et al, “Development of Composite Coiled Tubing for Oilfield Services”, SPE 26536, 1-15, (1993).