This invention relates to an improved acceptor for coins, tokens or like items with an attributable monetary value.
Conventional coin acceptors include a coin rundown path down which coins travel through a sensing station where sensors detect characteristics of the coin. Examples are described in our GB-A-2 169 429 and WO99/23615. Typically, inductive sensors are provided at the sensing station which perform inductive coin tests and produce coin parameter signals that are a function of the material and metallic content of the coin under test. Other sensors may be used, such as one or more optical sensors. The coin parameter signals are digitised and compared with stored coin data by means of a micro controller to determine the acceptability and often the denomination of the tested coin. If the coin is found to be acceptable, the micro controller operates an accept gate and the coin is directed to an accept path, but otherwise the accept gate remains closed and the coin is directed to a reject path.
The coin rundown path comprises an inclined rundown surface or flight deck, along which the coins roll edgewise through the coin sensing station, the flight deck being disposed between closely spaced, generally upwardly extending side walls which maintain the coin with its perimeter edge on the flight deck. One or both of the side walls may be inclined to the vertical so to encourage the coin under test to tip over whilst moving down the flight path, so that one of its major surfaces tends to slide along one of the side walls. This is intended to reduce wobbling of the coin on the rundown path. Coin wobble can vary the distance between the inductive sensors and successive coins as they pass through the sensing station, and produce an unwanted variation in the inductive coupling with the sensors from coin to coin as they are tested, which degrades the coin parameter signals.
Coins may become jammed in the coin rundown path. Conventionally, this problem has been addressed by moving the side walls apart to clear the jam. One of the sidewalls is formed as a part of the main body of the acceptor and the other side wall is defined by a surface on a door that is hinged on the main body. In the event of a coin jam, a release mechanism is operated to open the hinged door slightly, thereby moving apart the side walls so that the jammed coin can fall off the flight deck and into the reject path. The provision of a door however, undesirably adds to the manufacturing cost of the coin acceptor. Also, if the sensors are mounted on the door, a flexible wiring harness needs to be provided to accommodate the hinge and connect the sensors to the micro controller on the main body. The harness also adds to the manufacturing cost.
In accordance with invention there is provided a coin acceptor comprising a coin sensing station, a coin rundown path extending through the sensing station, the path including a coin guiding surface on which a major face of the coin lies in sliding engagement during its passage along the path through the sensing station, wherein the path is curved such that the said face of the coin is urged by centripetal force against the coin guiding surface as it moves along the path.
The pressing of the major surface of the coin against the coin guiding surface by centripetal force reduces the likelihood of coin wobble. Also, the coin path can be made much wider than hitherto, which may obviate the need for a coin jam release mechanism such as the hinged door often used hitherto.
The coin acceptor may have a main body with the coin guiding surface, and a cover mounted on the body, such that the coin path extends between said surface and the cover. The cover can fixedly mounted on the body, without the need for a coin jam release mechanism.
A coin inlet may be provided, with a curved inlet surface for guiding a coin inserted in the inlet to a particular region of the coin guiding surface.
The invention also provides a coin acceptor comprising a coin sensing station, a coin rundown path extending through the sensing station, and sensor coils at the coin sensing station, one of said coils comprising an elongate winding extending longitudinally along the coin rundown path.
The elongate coil may be wound on an elongate former which is longer than it is wide and may be longer than the maximum diameter of coins to be accepted thereby. Processing circuitry may be coupled to the elongate coil to derive therefrom a coin parameter signal as a function of coin diameter.
At least one coil of circular cross section may also be provided at the sensing station, which has a diameter smaller than the minimum diameter of coins to be accepted.
The invention further includes a coin acceptor comprising a coin sensing station, a coin rundown path extending through the sensing station, the path including a curved coin guiding surface on which a major face of the coin lies in sliding engagement during its passage along the path through the sensing station, and a side wall opposite to the coin guiding surface, said coin rundown path extending between the coin guiding surface and the sidewall, wherein said side wall is fixedly mounted relative to the curved coin guiding surface.
The invention also provides a coin acceptor comprising a coin sensing station, a coin rundown path extending through the sensing station, the path including a curved coin guiding surface on which a major face of the coin lies in sliding engagement during its passage along the path through the sensing station, and means to relieve a pressure differential between the major face of the coin and the coin guiding surface to inhibit coins sticking to the coin guiding surface. The acceptor may include pressure relief holes through the coin guiding surface.
In order that the invention may be more fully understood an embodiment thereof will now be described by way of example with reference to the accompanying drawings in which:
The coin sensing station 4 includes three coin sensing coil units S1, S2 and S3, which are energised in order to produce an inductive coupling with the coin. Also, a coil unit PS is provided in the accept path 6, downstream of the gate 5, to act as a credit sensor in order to detect whether a coin that was determined to be acceptable, has in fact passed into the accept path 6. The credit sensor may be mounted in a cash box (not shown) that receives true coins from the accept path rather than the acceptor itself.
The coils are energised at different frequencies by a drive and interface circuit 10 shown schematically in
In order to determine coin authenticity, the coin parameter signals produced by a coin under test are fed to a microcontroller 11 which is coupled to a memory 12. The microcontroller 11 processes the coin parameter signals x1,-x3 derived from the coin under test and compares the outcome with corresponding stored values held in the memory 12. The stored values are held in terms of windows having upper and lower value limits. Thus, if the processed data falls within the corresponding windows associated with a true coin of a particular denomination, the coin is indicated to be acceptable, but otherwise is rejected. If acceptable, a signal is provided on line 13 to a drive circuit 14 which operates the gate 5 shown in
The microcontroller 11 compares the processed data with a number of different sets of operating window data appropriate for coins of different denominations so that the coin acceptor can accept or reject more than one coin of a particular currency set. If the coin is accepted, its passage along the accept path 6 is detected by the post acceptance credit sensor coil unit PS, and the unit 10 passes corresponding data to the microcontroller 11, which in turn provides an output on line 15 that indicates the amount of monetary credit attributed to the accepted coin.
The sensor coil units S each include an inductor coil connected in an individual oscillatory circuit and the coil drive and interface circuit 10 includes a multiplexer to scan outputs from the coil units sequentially, so as to provide data to the microcontroller 11. Each circuit typically oscillates at a frequency in a range of 50-150 kHz and the circuit components are selected so that each sensor coil S1-S4 has a different natural resonant frequency in order to avoid cross-coupling between them.
As the coin passes each of the sensor coil unit S1-S3, its impedance is altered by the presence of the coin over a period of ˜100 milliseconds. As a result, the amplitude of the oscillations through the coil is modified over the period that the coin passes and also the oscillation frequency is altered. The variation in amplitude and frequency resulting from the modulation produced by the coin is used to produce the coin parameter signals x1,-x3 representative of characteristics of the coin.
The Coin Rundown Path
The coin rundown path 2 is defined by a curved surface 22 on the main body 1 and a curved coin guiding surface 23 on the right side cover 16. The coin guiding surface 23 extends into the coin inlet 3 as can be seen from the top plan view of
Referring to
As shown in the sectional view of
As shown in
Thereafter, the coin 26 moves in a curved path shown by arrow B through the coin sensing station. The coin falls by gravity down the inclined ledge 24 and the generally vertically and horizontally curved nature of the surface 22 ensures that one of the major circular side faces of the coin 26 is slidably engaged with surface 22 and is urged by a centripetal force against the surface 22 as it moves along path B through the sensing station 4. Thus, tendency for the coin to wobble is materially reduced due to the fact that it is held by centripetal force in sliding engagement with the surface 22. In contrast, conventional validators have used a linear path so that even if the coin were inclined to the vertical, the rotating coin would tend to try and stand upright as a result of its rotation thereby inducing coin wobble.
When the coin reaches the end of path B, it then falls due to gravity along path C over the generally vertical surface 25 to be accepted or rejected on accept path 6 or reject path 7 in the manner previously described, under the control of gate 5.
Since the coin 26 is urged against surface 22 by centripetal force, spacing between the side walls of the coin rundown path can be made larger than in conventional coin acceptors, obviating the requirement for a hinged door to release coin jams. Thus, the right side cover 16 can be fixedly attached to the main body 1 without the need for a hinged coin door to clear coin jams.
The configuration of the sensor coils S1, S2 and S3 will now be described in more detail.
The elongate coil S3 provides an indication of the diameter of the coin. As the coin passes the coil, a generally rectangular amplitude deviation x3 is produced as shown in
An advantage of the arrangement of coils S1-S3 is that they are all mounted on the same side of the coin rundown path, on the rear wall of the main body that provides the curved surface 22. Thus, the inductive coupling with a coin under test can reliably be formed with the coils through the curved surface 22, and the coin is urged against it by centripetal force, as previously explained. Therefore the distance between the coin under test and the coils S1-S3 remains substantially constant from coin to coin, which improves reliability of the coin parameter signals produced by the coils.
Also, providing the coils S1-S3 only one side of the path 2 has the advantage that no electrical connections need to be made between the main body 1 and the right cover 16, which reduces the cost of the coin acceptor.
Referring now to
Many modifications and variations fall within the scope of the invention. For example, whilst the acceptor has been described for use with coins, it can also be used with tokens and other similar items with an attributable monetary value. Also, the retaining force for the coin as it moves over the curved surface may comprise a centrifugal force and the term centripetal as used herein is to be interpreted accordingly.
Number | Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
0307880.5 | Apr 2003 | GB | national |
Filing Document | Filing Date | Country | Kind | 371c Date |
---|---|---|---|---|
PCT/GB2004/001457 | 4/2/2004 | WO | 00 | 10/3/2006 |
Publishing Document | Publishing Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
WO2004/088597 | 10/14/2004 | WO | A |
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
3907086 | Willis | Sep 1975 | A |
4062435 | Chalabian | Dec 1977 | A |
4821863 | Okada | Apr 1989 | A |
4989714 | Abe | Feb 1991 | A |
5480348 | Mazur et al. | Jan 1996 | A |
6109417 | Kovens et al. | Aug 2000 | A |
6173826 | Furneaux | Jan 2001 | B1 |
6206167 | Taylor et al. | Mar 2001 | B1 |
20030150687 | King | Aug 2003 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
2 293 767 | Jun 2001 | CA |
0 704 825 | Apr 1996 | EP |
2 169 429 | Jul 1986 | GB |
WO 9923615 | May 1999 | WO |
WO 0159714 | Aug 2001 | WO |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20070039800 A1 | Feb 2007 | US |