The invention relates to a coke oven of horizontal construction (non-recovery/heat recovery type) consisting of at least one coking chamber, laterally arranged vertical downcomers as well as bottom flues arranged horizontally and extending underneath the coking chamber for indirect reheating of said coking chamber, wherein one or more gas space dividing walls are arranged in the oven free space which in the intended operation of the coke oven is not destined for being filled with solid matter.
Coke ovens of horizontal construction are known from prior art in technology and they are in frequent use. Examples of such coke ovens are described in U.S. Pat. Nos. 4,111,757, 4,344,820, 6,596,128 B2 or DE 691 06 312 T2.
Known from prior art in technology are different approaches designed to speed up the coking time of coal and to assure a uniform advance of coal carbonisation in the coal charge or stamped coal cake.
The approach strongly pursued here was to improve gas routing in the oven room. In DE 10 2005 055483 it is proposed to automate the air feed which is accomplished through the oven doors and to control it depending on the coking time through a central drive. Even though a good controllability is thereby achieved, the problem still exists of supplying the depth of the oven room evenly with combustion air without unnecessarily increasing the burn-off in the area near the oven door too much.
DE 10 2005 025955 proposes a multiple feed of combustion air which is realised through a distribution system that is mainly arranged on the oven top. Through this distribution system, primary combustion air is conducted from above through the oven top via many openings into the oven room. This system of feeding combustion gas represents a marked improvement versus a central introduction of combustion air through openings in the oven door. Still there is a demand, however, to further improve the gas routing in the coke oven and to reduce the coking time, thereby improving the economic efficiency of this method.
This task is solved by the coke oven of horizontal construction (non-recovery/heat recovery type) as defined in the principal claim. This coke oven consists of at least one coking chamber, laterally arranged vertical downcomers as well as bottom flues arranged horizontally and extending underneath the coking chamber for indirect reheating of said coking chamber, wherein one or more gas space dividing walls are arranged in the oven free space which in the intended operation of the coke oven is not destined for being filled with solid matter.
The gas space dividing walls may have any form and are ideally shaped as hanging ribs or hanging walls, which can be further improved to have openings or a partly open structure.
In principle the gas space dividing walls can be fastened in any kind in the oven chamber. Ideally the gas space dividing walls are detachably hung into suitable holders, with these holders being mounted in the wall and/or top of the coking chamber. On the one hand it has the advantage that the gas space dividing walls can be taken out more easily when work is to be done on a coke oven chamber, and on the other hand it is avoided in this manner that expansion processes are transferred into the oven brickwork.
Another improved variant of the coke oven lies in adapting the gas routing to the positioning of the gas space dividing walls. Thus, when the coking chamber is section-wise divided by the gas space dividing walls, at least one air feeder main for primary combustion air is led into each of these sections and one or two downcomers are led out from each of these sections.
An improved variant of the coke oven lies in that at least part of the interior walls of the coking chamber and/or part of the surfaces of the gas space dividing walls is configured as secondary gas heating surfaces by coating them with a high-emission coating (HEB), with the emission degree of this high-emission coating being equal to or greater than 0.9.
This HEB preferably consists of the substances Cr2O3 or Fe2O3 or of a mixture containing these substances, with the portion of Fe2O3 amounting to at least 25% by wt. in a mixture and with the portion of Cr2O3 amounting to at least 20% by wt. in a mixture. Alternatively, the HEB can also contain SiC with a portion of at least 20% by wt.
In an improved variant of this coke oven, the HEB furthermore contains one or more inorganic binding agents. It has also been found that the constituents of the HEB should have a special grain size which is smaller than or equal to 15 μm and which ideally ranges between 2.5 and 10 μm.
By way of the HEB, the radiation situation in the coke oven room is substantially improved and the fast coking process from top to bottom is further speeded up.
The coke oven can be further improved by coating the walls of flue gas channels extending horizontally underneath the coking chamber partly or entirely with HEB in any one of the material composition as described hereinabove, thus improving the indirect heat transport through the floor of the coke oven chamber.
Also covered by the present invention is a method for production of coke by implementing the coke oven described hereinabove, utilising one of the embodiments. In general, a multitude of the described coke ovens are then operated more or less in parallel.
According to a particularly suitable variant of the method it is provided that the temperature in the coking chamber during the coking process ideally amounts to 1,000 to 1,400° C. on average. This temperature may also be exceeded for a short period of time.
Through vertical downcomers 11, which extend in the oven walls 3 from the oven free space of the oven room 5 to the horizontal flue gas channels 8 underneath the oven floor 4, the gases developing during coal carbonisation can be discharged.
The interior surfaces of the oven room 5 are provided with an HEB that consists of Cr2O3, Fe2O3 and SiC in equal portions. This HEB of the interior walls, thereby becoming secondary heating surfaces, has not been shown here any further. Furthermore, gas space dividing walls 12, tertiary heating surfaces, are mounted in oven room 5 vertically and parallel to each other which, by and large, fill the free cross-section above the coal charge 7 and which are also coated with this HEB. The gas space dividing walls 12 are mounted to the holder elements 13 which in the case shown here have a shape of wall and roof anchors. In the example shown here, a small, circumferential gap 14 is left between the interior wall surfaces of the oven room 5, coal charge 7 and the outer edge of gas space dividing wall 12 in order to allow for a horizontal convection in the oven room 5 and to prevent damage to material due to differences in the expansion behaviour of the structural parts.
In a sectional view,
By way of this division of the coke oven into various sections with a section-wise gas routing and by way of the homogenisation of radiation through the gas space dividing wall, it was managed to reduce coking time and to minimise losses of product in the area close to oven doors.
Number | Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
10 2006 045 056 | Sep 2006 | DE | national |
Filing Document | Filing Date | Country | Kind | 371c Date |
---|---|---|---|---|
PCT/EP2007/007812 | 9/7/2007 | WO | 00 | 5/21/2010 |
Publishing Document | Publishing Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
WO2008/034531 | 3/27/2008 | WO | A |
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
4111757 | Ciarimboli | Sep 1978 | A |
4284072 | McKaveney | Aug 1981 | A |
4287024 | Thompson | Sep 1981 | A |
4344820 | Thompson | Aug 1982 | A |
5114542 | Childress et al. | May 1992 | A |
5318671 | Pruitt | Jun 1994 | A |
6596128 | Westbrook | Jul 2003 | B2 |
20090152092 | Kim et al. | Jun 2009 | A1 |
20100025217 | Schuecker et al. | Feb 2010 | A1 |
20100065412 | Kim | Mar 2010 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
44 02 390 | May 1995 | DE |
691 06 312 | May 1995 | DE |
10 2005 025 955 | Mar 2007 | DE |
10 2005 055 483 | May 2007 | DE |
0 742 276 | Nov 1996 | EP |
Entry |
---|
Ulrich Kochanski et al; Overview of Uhde Heat Recovery Cokemaking Technology; AISTech 2005 Proceedings, Iron and Steel Technology Conference Proceedings, Association for Iron and Steel Technology; 2005; pp. 25-32, vol. I; U.S.; XP008068124. |
Walter E. Buss et al; Thyssen Still Otto/PACTI nonrecovery cokemaking system; Iron and Steel Engineer, Association of Iron and Steel Engineers; Jan. 1999; pp. 33-38, vol. 76, No. 1; Pittsburgh, U.S.; XP000799176. |
Meinhard Schulte et al; Einsatz von Hochemissions-Coatings an Innenwaenden von Waermoefen; Stahl und Eisen; Mar. 14, 1990; pp. 99-104, vol. 110, No. 3; Duesseldorf, Germany; XP000135342. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20100065413 A1 | Mar 2010 | US |