The present invention relates to a cutting tool, such as, for example, a rotatable cutting tool which is a component of an earth-working apparatus, used to impinge upon earth strata such as, for example, ore-bearing or coal-bearing earth (or mineral) formations, as well as asphaltic roadway material. More specifically, the present invention pertains to such a cutting tool that includes a cutting tool body that contains a hard cutting tip at the axial forward end thereof. The cutting tool body, and especially the portion of the cutting tool body adjacent the axial forward socket that receives the hard cutting tip, has improved strength properties, as well as improved retention of the hard cutting tip to the cutting tool body.
Heretofore, a rotatable cutting tool has been used to impinge upon earth strata, such as for example, ore-bearing or coal-bearing earth (or mineral) formations, as well as asphaltic roadway material and the like. Such a rotatable cutting tool typically comprises an elongate cutting tool body that has an axial forward end and an axial rearward end. In one embodiment of such a cutting tool, the cutting tool body has a socket at the axial forward end wherein the socket receives a hard cutting tip. In such an embodiment, the hard cutting tip is affixed to the cutting tool body by brazing or the like.
As can be appreciated, during operation the entire rotatable cutting tool is typically subjected to a variety of extreme cutting forces in an abrasive and erosive environment. It would be undesirable for the cutting tool body to prematurely wear or fail (whether it be through catastrophic fracture or the like or through abrasive or erosive wear) prior to the hard cutting tip wearing to the end point of its useful life. Further, would be undesirable for the hard cutting tip to become detached prematurely from the cutting tool body, whether it be through catastrophic fracture or the like, prior to the hard cutting tip or the cutting tool body wearing to the end point of their useful life.
In either circumstance, the rotatable cutting tool would have to replaced prior to the normally scheduled time for replacement. Further, the premature failure of the rotatable cutting tool would negatively impact the cutting or milling efficiency of the overall earthworking (e.g., mining) apparatus. It thus becomes apparent that it is important that the cutting tool body possess the requisite strength to maintain its integrity during the intended useful life of the rotatable cutting tool. It is also apparent that it is important for the hard cutting tip to remain attached to the cutting tool body throughout the intended useful life of the rotatable cutting tool.
Heretofore, a cold-heading or cold-forming process has been used to form some portions of the cutting tool body. One exemplary patent is U.S. Pat. No. 4,627,665 to Ewing et al. that shows the cold forming of a cutting tool body. However, a number of steps are necessary to form certain portion of the cutting tool body. For example, the puller groove is formed via a separate roll-forming operation while the socket and the axial forward portion of the rotatable cutting tool is formed via a cold-heading process. U.S. Pat. No. 6,397,652 to Sollami is another example of a patent that shows a cutting tool body formed by a cold forming process.
U.S. Pat. No. 7,360,845 B2 to Ojanen is still another example of a cutting tool body formed by a cold forming process. This patent shows a cold-headed puller groove and a cold-headed socket. However, the cold-headed socket of this patent is a shallow socket. In the specific embodiment, the shallow socket has a depth equal to about one-seventh of the diameter of the shallow socket.
It can therefore be appreciated that it would be desirable to provide an improved cutting tool body, including a rotatable cutting tool body, that exhibits improved strength properties. It can also be appreciated that it would be desirable to provide an improved cutting tool body, including a rotatable cutting tool body, that minimizes the tendency to prematurely wear or fail (whether it be through catastrophic fracture or the like or through abrasive or erosive wear) prior to the hard cutting tip wearing to the end point of its useful life. Further, it would be desirable to provide an improved cutting tool, including a rotatable cutting tool, that minimizes the tendency of the hard cutting tip to become detached prematurely from the cutting tool body, whether it be through catastrophic fracture or the like, prior to the hard cutting tip or the cutting tool body wearing to the end point of their useful life.
In one form thereof, the invention is a cutting tool body that includes an elongate steel body, which has an axial forward end and an axial rearward end. The elongate steel body contains at the axial forward end thereof a cold-headed socket. The cold-headed socket has an axial forward open end, an axial rearward closed surface, and a side socket surface extending between the axial forward open end and the axial rearward closed surface. The side socket surface contains an undercut adjacent the axial rearward closed surface.
In another form thereof, the invention is a rotatable cutting tool that comprises a cutting tool body which has an axial forward end and an axial rearward end. The cutting tool body contains at the axial forward end thereof a cold-headed socket having a central longitudinal socket axis. The cold-headed socket has an axial forward open end, an axial rearward closed surface, and the axial forward open end of the cold-headed socket has a transverse open end width. There is a side socket surface extending between the axial forward open end and the axial rearward closed surface. The side socket surface is generally parallel to the central longitudinal socket axis. The side socket surface has a longitudinal socket surface length. The side socket surface contains an undercut adjacent the axial rearward closed surface. The longitudinal socket surface length is greater than the transverse open end width. The cutting tool further includes a hard cutting tip. The cold-headed socket receives the axial rearward base section whereby the hard cutting tip being affixed to the cutting tool body.
In yet another form thereof, the invention is a rotatable cutting tool that comprises a cutting tool body that has an axial forward end and an axial rearward end. The cutting tool body contains at the axial forward end thereof a cold-headed socket, which has a central longitudinal socket axis. The cold-headed socket has an axial forward open end, an axial rearward closed surface, and the axial forward open end of the cold-headed socket has a transverse open end width. The cold-headed socket has a side socket surface which extends between the axial forward open end and the axial rearward closed surface. The side socket surface is generally parallel to the central longitudinal socket axis. The side socket surface has a longitudinal socket surface length. The side socket surface contains an undercut adjacent the axial rearward closed surface. The longitudinal socket surface length is between about 0.20 times and about four times greater than the transverse open end width. The cutting tool includes a hard cutting tip that has an axial rearward base section having a longitudinal base length and an axial forward tip section. The cold-headed socket receives the axial rearward base section whereby the hard cutting tip being affixed to the cutting tool body.
The following is a brief description of the drawings which form a part of this patent application:
Referring to the drawings,
A plurality of cutting tool holders (or blocks) 30 are affixed (typically by welding) (typically in a helical pattern) to the peripheral surface 24 of the rotatable drum 20. Each one of the cutting tool holders 30 carries a rotatable cutting tool generally designated as 40. There should be an appreciation that, at least in some aspects, there is no intention that the present invention be limited to a rotatable cutting tool. The claims define the true spirit and scope of the present invention.
As shown in
Still referring to
Cutting tool body 42 contains a cold-headed socket 50 at the axial forward end 44 thereof. The cold-headed socket 50 is described in more detail hereinafter. In the specific embodiment of
Referring to
Socket 50 has a cylindrical side socket surface 52 that extends in an axial rearward direction from the axial forward open end 64 (see
The side socket surface 52 has a longitudinal socket surface length B. The longitudinal side socket surface B includes an undercut 55, which is described in more detail hereinafter. The axial forward open end 64 of the cold-headed socket 52 has a transverse open end width C. In the specific embodiment, the longitudinal side socket surface length B is greater than the transverse open end width C. In one range, the longitudinal side socket surface length B is between about 0.20 times and about four times greater than the transverse open end width C. In another range, the longitudinal socket surface length B is between about 0.60 times and about 2.5 times greater than the transverse open end width C. In still another range, the longitudinal socket surface length B is between about 0.80 times and about 1.8 times greater than the transverse open end width C. In a preferred embodiment, the longitudinal socket surface length B is about 0.9 times greater than the transverse open end width C.
Socket 50 further has an undercut 55 adjacent the axial rearward closed surface 58. The undercut 55 is defined by a forward radially outward surface 54 that extends in a radial outward direction from the central longitudinal axis A-A of the deep socket 50. The radially outward surface 54 terminates at a radially outward periphery 56 contiguous with the radially outward surface 54. The undercut 55 is further defined by a rearward radial outward surface 57. The rearward radial outward surface 57 extends in a radial outward direction and is contiguous with the axially rearward closed surface 58.
In regard to the dimensioning of the undercut 55, in one range, the undercut 55 extends along the side socket surface 52 from the axial rearward closed surface 58 toward the axial forward open end 64 an undercut longitudinal distance D equal to between about 0.06 and about 0.33 of the longitudinal socket surface length B. In another range, the undercut 55 extends along the side socket surface 52 from the axial rearward closed end 58 toward the axial forward open end 64 an undercut longitudinal distance D equal to between about 0.12 and about 0.25 of the longitudinal socket surface length B. In still another range, the undercut 55 extends along the side socket surface 52 from the axial rearward closed end 58 toward the axial forward open end 64 an undercut longitudinal distance D equal to between about 0.15 and about 0.20 of the longitudinal socket surface length B. In a preferred embodiment, the undercut 55 extends along the side socket surface 52 from the axial rearward closed end 58 toward the axial forward open end 64 an undercut longitudinal distance D equal to between about 0.18 the longitudinal socket surface length B.
In further reference to the undercut 55, the undercut 55 extends in a radial outward direction from the central longitudinal socket axis A-A an undercut radial distance E from the side socket surface 52. In one range, the undercut 55 extends in a radial outward direction an undercut radial distance E away from the side socket surface 52 equal to between about 0.03 and about 0.06 of the transverse open end width C. In another range, the undercut 55 extends in a radial outward direction an undercut radial distance E away from the side socket surface 52 equal to between about 0.04 and about 0.05 of the transverse open end width C.
Referring to
In reference to
The overall braze joint 90 thus comprises a rearward braze joint 92 and an undercut braze joint 94. By providing an overall braze joint 90 with these two separate sections, i.e., a rearward braze joint 92 and an undercut braze joint 94, there has been an improvement of the retention capability of the cutting tool. The undercut braze joint 94 extends in a radial outward direction an undercut braze joint radial distance J away from the hard cutting tip 70. The undercut braze joint radial distance J is equal to between about 0.03 and about 0.06 of the transverse open end width C. In another range, the undercut braze joint radial distance J is equal to between about 0.04 and about 0.05 of the transverse open end width C.
All patents, patent applications, articles and other documents identified herein are hereby incorporated by reference herein. Other embodiments of the invention may be apparent to those skilled in the art from a consideration of the specification or the practice of the invention disclosed herein. It is intended that the specification and any examples set forth herein be considered as illustrative only, with the true spirit and scope of the invention being indicated by the following claims.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
3807804 | Kniff | Apr 1974 | A |
3970158 | Black et al. | Jul 1976 | A |
4181187 | Lumen | Jan 1980 | A |
4289211 | Lumen | Sep 1981 | A |
4627665 | Ewing | Dec 1986 | A |
4850649 | Beach | Jul 1989 | A |
5161627 | Burkett | Nov 1992 | A |
5324098 | Massa et al. | Jun 1994 | A |
6397652 | Sollami | Jun 2002 | B1 |
6607249 | Taitt | Aug 2003 | B2 |
6851758 | Beach | Feb 2005 | B2 |
7360845 | Ojanen | Apr 2008 | B2 |
7594703 | Hall et al. | Sep 2009 | B2 |
20020063467 | Taitt | May 2002 | A1 |
20080129104 | Hall et al. | Jun 2008 | A1 |
20080246329 | Hall et al. | Oct 2008 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20100187896 A1 | Jul 2010 | US |