Cold water wash formula

Information

  • Patent Grant
  • 5763382
  • Patent Number
    5,763,382
  • Date Filed
    Wednesday, January 3, 1996
    28 years ago
  • Date Issued
    Tuesday, June 9, 1998
    26 years ago
Abstract
A cold water washing formula and a method of reducing the soil load on a textile by introducing the textile and cold water into an internal assembly within a washing machine. The method includes a first break wash wherein the textile, water, and a solvent are introduced into the washing machine to initiate soil removal. In a second break wash, a surfactant and an alkali are added to the first break wash to continue the washing cycle. The combined first and second break washes are drained from the internal assembly and the textile is rinsed with water. After draining the first rinse from the internal assembly, a second rinse including ozonated water and an acid is introduced into the internal assembly. The second rinse is drained from the internal assembly and a third rinse, which includes ozonated water, is introduced into the internal assembly to rinse the textile. The invention also includes a cold water washing formula which includes ozonated water, a non-ionic surfactant, a solvent, and a sufficient amount of an acid to maintain the cold water washing formula to a pH below 13.
Description

TECHNICAL FIELD
The present invention relates generally to a method of cold water washing to clean and deodorize textiles. More specifically, this invention relates to a method of washing textiles that utilizes ozone, surfactants, solvents, acids and alkalis to increase the efficiency of the laundry wash process.
BACKGROUND
Ozone (O.sub.3) is a triatomic allotrope of oxygen in which the ozone molecule consists of three oxygen atoms in contrast to the two oxygen atoms which comprise the typical oxygen molecule (O.sub.2). Ozone can be generated by passing air or oxygen through a high intensity electric field. Some of the oxygen molecules will be energized and will split into two separate atoms. These individual oxygen atoms will then form weak bonds with other oxygen molecules. The ozone molecule is oxygen in a highly reactive form, which has a tendency to give up its extra oxygen atom and gain electrons. This molecular structure gives ozone its high oxidizing power, which allows ozone to react rapidly with a large variety of compounds.
Although ozone has been primarily employed in disinfection of culinary water and municipal waste water treatment, it can perform other functions such as color reduction, odor and taste removal, and oxidation of inorganic and organic compounds in water.
Ozone acts as a positively charged molecule that is electron deficient. Organic and hydrocarbon stains such as greases, fats, and oils have centers of high electron density and carry a negative charge. When ozone is introduced into a washing machine, it is attracted to these molecules and subsequently reacts chemically with the soil in an oxidation process. The kinetics of the reaction between soil and ozone is very high; thus, the reaction between these two substances is extremely fast. Ozone will begin to react within a fraction of a second after contact. In the process, ozone will give up its third oxygen atom, which will chemically bond with the soil molecule. An oxygen atom is highly electronegative and when added to a soil molecule, the electronegative charge will cause the chemical double bond of the molecule to polarize (reverse charge). Polarization will cause a large soil molecule to fragment into several smaller molecules. The strength of attachment between soil and a textile is largely a function of the size of the soil molecule. Smaller soil molecules will be more easily removed from the textile. The size of the molecule also has a direct effect on the solubility of the soil whereby a reduction in molecular size of the soil will greatly increase the amount of soil that is dissolved in the wash liquor.
Surfactants and alkalis are used in most laundry detergents. Their main purpose is to suspend soil by bonding with the soil molecules to prevent redeposition of the soil. Additionally, surfactants play a key role in loosening of the soil. Some soils can be removed from the textile surface by mechanical action and water alone, but the majority cannot. Thus, a major part of the role of the surfactant is to loosen and dissolve soil from the textile. However, this task can be facilitated by ozone. A primary purpose of ozone in laundry processing is to remove the soil from the textile through polarization. A secondary purpose is to oxidize the soil molecules, making it more soluble and allowing for faster precipitation. Ozone is in a highly reactive gaseous form in laundry processing, allowing it to react with and remove soil at a greatly increased rate, which accounts for a substantial reduction in processing time.
Alkalis are used for controlling the pH and active alkalinity of the wash water. Alkalis bond with cations, such as calcium and magnesium, allowing surfactants to react with soils more effectively. Alkalis can sequester the hardness in water and can prevent calcium and magnesium from forming insoluble soaps. Alkalis have superior soil suspending properties which contribute to the function of surfactants and ozone. Thus, when using ozone as a wash chemical, it is only necessary to use a small amount of alkali on heavy industrial soil and in the bleach cycle for pH control.
Solvents are used to hold other substances, such as surfactants and alkalis, in solution and dissolve soils found on the textile to be cleaned.
The use of ozone in the laundry process reduces or eliminates the need for other laundry chemicals and finishing products such as antichlor, "sour", bactericides, and mildewcides. Antichlor is used to neutralize any residual chlorine bleach. Ozone oxidizes chlorine bleach and completely neutralizes it. For this reason, ozone is not used in a chlorine bleach cycle. However, since ozone has bleaching capability, the need for chlorine bleach is reduced and, consequently, the need for antichlor is likewise reduced. Sour is used to neutralize the effects of alkali on the pH of the wash solution. Since the use of ozone greatly reduces the need for alkali, the need for sour is also reduced or altogether eliminated.
Ozone is the strongest oxidant commercially available for the treatment of water. Due to ozone's high oxidation potential, the duration of the wash cycle can be reduced relative to those cycles using chlorine as an oxidant, while attaining the same or higher oxidative capabilities. Wash temperatures and alkalinity can also be reduced. These contribute to increased textile life by decreasing stress on the fabric through limited mechanical action, more neutral pH's and lower temperatures. It also enhances washroom throughput.
It would be an improvement in the art to have a relatively economical, reliable cold water washing formula and method of washing and deodorizing textiles such as garments or linens.
DISCLOSURE OF THE INVENTION
Surprisingly, it has been found that a cold water wash method utilizing ozonated water together with a surfactant, a solvent, an alkali, and an acid, results in a synergistic cleaning combination. Additional benefits from using ozone in laundry processing include dramatically increased washroom capacity due to decrease in processing or "formula" time, reduction in washroom labor, increased textile life, reduced water usage, and reduced utility consumption. The resulting soil oxide is easier to remove and suspend which allows for the use of greatly reduced break and suds events and the removal of some of the flushes. Due to ozone's high oxidation potential, excellent wash results can be achieved using only about half of the amount of surfactants usually required in washes using non-ozonated water. By using less chemicals, less rinsing is required to remove the chemicals. The reduction in the number of formula events results in a substantial decrease in water usage and a subsequent decrease in the volume of material discharged to sewers.
The present invention includes a cold water wash formula and methods of using the cold water wash to clean textiles. In particular, the invention concerns the use of ozone, a surfactant, a solvent, an acid, and an alkali for the purpose of cleaning heavily soiled textiles.
In one embodiment, the washing method comprises introducing the textile and a "first break wash" into the internal assembly of a washing machine, thus wetting the textile with the water and solvent in order to initiate soil removal. A "break wash" is a chemical bath wherein a surfactant, a solvent, and/or an alkali is added to a wash to initiate soil removal. The first break wash comprises water and a solvent. A second break wash, comprising a surfactant and an alkali, is added to the existing mixture. The resulting first and second break wash mixture is drained from the internal assembly of the washing machine. The textiles are then rinsed with, for example, water.
Following the initial rinse step, a combination of ozone gas, oxygen and/or oxygen enriched air is mixed into a liquid mixture, comprising water and an acid, to form an ozonated wash mixture. The ozonated wash mixture is then removed and the textiles are rinsed with ozonated water.
Throughout the described embodiment, the textiles are contacted with the various mixtures of wash liquids and rinses at temperatures ranging from about 40.degree. F. (4.degree. C.) to about 120.degree. F. (49.degree. C.). Throughout various steps of the method, the textiles are contacted by ozonated water, either alone or in combination with other described ingredients, for a period of time ranging from about 1 to about 30 minutes. The total wash time of the method ranges from about 25 to about 125 minutes.





BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWING
FIG. 1 is a block diagram illustrating the principal components of a washing machine utilizing an ozone injection system which may be used to carry out the method of the present invention.





BEST MODE OF THE INVENTION
The cold water (i.e. water below a temperature of about 125.degree. F. (about 52.degree. C.)) washing method includes sufficient amounts of the selected ingredients within each of the appropriate operational steps to clean and deodorize textiles. The actual amounts of ingredients will be highly dependent upon the amount and type of soils found on the textiles to be washed.
In a preferred mode, the method is carried out in five steps, consisting of two break operations followed by three rinse operations. The first break operation comprises introducing the textile, water, and a solvent into the internal assembly of a washing machine (FIG. 1) in order to initiate soil removal from the textile. The first break operation lasts for a period of time from about 1 minute to about 30 minutes and is maintained at a temperature range of from about 80.degree. F. (27.degree. C.) to about 120.degree. F. (49.degree. C.). The second break operation comprises adding surfactants and an alkali to the contents of the first break operation. The second break operation lasts for a period of time from about 1 minute to about 30 minutes and is maintained at a temperature range of about 80.degree. F. (27.degree. C.) to about 120.degree. F. (49.degree. C.). The liquid contents of the internal assembly of the washing machine are drained, leaving the wetted textile within the internal assembly of the washing machine.
The first rinse operation comprises rinsing the textiles with a first rinse solution which includes water (e.g. "softened" water). Preferably, a high water level, consisting of from about 35 to about 56 liters (ten to about fifteen gallons) of water per five to ten kilograms (10 to 20 pounds) of laundry, is used in the first rinse operation. The first rinse operation is preferably maintained at a temperature range of about 80.degree. F. (27.degree. C.) to about 120.degree. F. (49.degree. C.) and lasts for a period of time from about 1 minute to about 10 minutes. After completion of the first rinse operation, the water is drained from the internal assembly of the washing machine.
The second rinse operation comprises rinsing the textiles with a second rinse solution containing ozonated water and an acid. The ozonated water contains ozone at a concentration, in the gaseous phase, of up to about 15% by weight. The second rinse operation is preferably maintained at a temperature range of about 80.degree. F. (27.degree. C.) to about 110.degree. F. (43.degree. C.) and lasts for a period of time from about 1 minute to about 10 minutes.
Upon completion of the second rinse operation, the liquids are drained from the internal assembly of the washing machine.
The third rinse operation comprises rinsing the textiles with a third rinse solution comprising ozonated water. The ozonated water of the third rinse operation contains ozone at a concentration, in the gaseous phase, of up to about 15 % by weight. The third rinse operation is preferably maintained at a temperature range of about 70.degree. F. (21.degree. C.) to about 100.degree. F. (38.degree. C.) and lasts for a period of time from about 1 minute to about 10 minutes.
Methods of generating ozone and producing ozonated liquids are respectively disclosed in U.S. Pat. No. 5,213,773 to Burris, May 25, 1993, and in U.S. Pat. No. 5,181,399 to Engel et al., Jan. 26, 1993, the contents of which are incorporated herein by reference. In one preferred mode, the ozone gas is generated from oxygen or oxygen-enriched air by a corona discharge device that produces concentrations ranging between about 1% to about 15% by weight of ozone. The combination of ozone gas, oxygen and/or oxygen enriched air introduced into the liquid mixture comprises bubbles of gas having a size from about 5 microns to about 5000 microns in diameter entrained in the liquid portion of the liquid mixture.
In this mode, the concentration of ozone in the ozonated wash liquid ranges from about 0.01 ppm to about 50 ppm depending upon the nature of the textile and the soil type and content. The pH of the ozonated wash liquid is maintained at a pH from about 3 to about 6. The pH of the liquid mixture throughout the entire method (i.e. ozonated and non-ozonated steps) is maintained at a pH from about 3 to about 13. The preferred pH range is from about 4.4 to about 11.8. The temperature of the wash liquor is preferably maintained at a temperature in the range of about 50.degree. F. (10.degree. C.) to about 110.degree. F. (43.degree. C.).
Preferably, the method will use non-ionic surfactants. Preferred non-ionic surfactants contain either an alkyl ethoxylate or nonylphenol surfactants as a principal ingredient, and are commercially available under the trade designations "STAUNCH" and "RD-88" (both available from Unichem Corp., Chicago, Ill.).
A preferred solvent, containing terpene hydrocarbons in combination with a citrus extract, is D-limonene, commercially available from Van Waters & Rogers, Salt Lake City, Utah. Other preferred solvents include mineral spirits, petroleum-based solvents, terpene hydrocarbons, citrus based solvents, or a combination thereof. Compositions containing a combination of mineral spirits and petroleum-based solvents as principal ingredients are commercially available under the trade designations "RESERVE BASE" (available from Unichem Corp., Chicago, Ill.) and "FB SPECIAL" (available from Diversey Wyandotte Corp., Wyandotte, Mich.).
Water is preferably used in the present invention as a carrier for ozone molecules.
Preferred alkalis include sodium metasilicate, potassium orthosilicate, sodium orthosilicate, potassium metasilicate, sodium hydroxide, potassium hydroxide, and mixtures thereof.
Preferred acids include organic acids, mineral acids, and mixtures thereof. The acid used in the preferred mode is acetic acid, from Fisher Scientific, Fair Lawn, N.J. However, it should be understood that any comparable acid known in the art capable of modifying the pH of the cold water wash without damaging the textile or washing machine can be used.
Another preferred method further includes a "sudsing" operation (also known as a "suds wash" ) following the first rinse operation and a final rinse operation following the third rinse operation of the previously described preferred method. A "sudsing" operation is a chemical bath occurring between the break bath and the bleach bath or rinse cycle. The sudsing operation comprises introducing ozonated water, a surfactant, a solvent, an acid, and a suspending agent to the textiles, said textiles having been subjected to two break operations and one rinse operation. The sudsing operation lasts for a period of time from about 1 minute to about 30 minutes and is maintained at a temperature range of about 80.degree. F. (27.degree. C.) to about 120.degree. F. (49.degree. C.). The pH of the sudsing liquid is preferably maintained at a range from about 3 to about 6. After completion of the sudsing operation, the liquid contents of the internal assembly of the washing machine are drained.
The final rinse operation comprises rinsing the textiles with non-ozonated water. The final rinse operation lasts for a period of time from about 1 minute to about 10 minutes and is maintained at a temperature range of about 50.degree. F. (10.degree. C.) to about 80.degree. F. (27.degree. C.). The pH is maintained at a range from about 6 to about 9. The method is completed by draining the rinse solution.
As used herein, "draining" or "removing" a liquid from the washing machine or one of its components involves the removal of a majority of the liquid from the machine or its components so as not to substantially interfere with the next step in the process or the process itself. Complete removal of liquid is, of course, not necessary, and nearly always some rinse, wash or suds liquid will remain associated with the textile to be cleaned.
A preferred suspending agent is carboxymethyl cellulose, available from Sigma Chemical Co., St. Louis, Mo. It is understood that other comparable suspending agents known in the art capable of maintaining the chemicals used in the present method in solution can be used (e.g. sodium metasilicate and sodium polyacrylate).
The following illustrative examples may help to explain the invention:
EXAMPLE I
A method of cold water washing to clean and deodorize textiles was conducted as follows:
______________________________________ Quantity WaterOperation Used Level Time(min.) Temp pH______________________________________Step 1: Break (no 50 ml 7.75 gal 8 95.degree. F. 8.0drain) (29.4 (35.degree. C.)solvent (FB liters)SPECIAL)Step 2: Break 100 g 7.75 gal 5 95.degree. F. 11.8Na metasilicate 25 ml (29.4 (35.degree. C.)surfactant (RD-88) 2 ml liters)surfactant (Staunch)Step 3: Rinse 13 gal 3 95.degree. F. 11.4No chemical (49.2 (35.degree. C.)additions liters)Step 4: Rinse 20 ml 13 gal 8 80.degree. F. 4.44% ozone (w/w) (49.2 (27.degree. C.)acetic acid liters)Step 5: Rinse 13 gal 3 70.degree. F. 5.24% ozone (w/w) (49.2 (21.degree. C.) liters)______________________________________
The cold water wash method was conducted on a 30 pound capacity "SPEED QUEEN" washing machine, available from Speed Queen Company, Ripon, Wis. The wash method was performed on heavily soiled textiles. The method of EXAMPLE I resulted in a thoroughly cleansed and deodorized wash load.
EXAMPLE II
A method of cold water washing to clean and deodorize textiles was conducted as follows:
______________________________________ Quantity WaterOperation Used Level Time(min.) Temp pH______________________________________Step 1: Break (no 100 ml 7.75 10 105.degree. F. 8.0drain) gal (41.degree. C.)solvent (FB (29.4SPECIAL) liters)Step 2: Break 200 g 7.75 8 105.degree. F. 11.8Na metasilicate 45 ml gal (41.degree. C.)surfactant (RD-88) 5 ml (29.4surfactant 10 ml liters)(STAUNCH)D-limoneneStep 3: Rinse 13 gal 5 105.degree. F. 11.4No chemical (49.2 (41.degree. C.)additions liters)Step 4: Suds 25 ml 7.75 10 90.degree. F. 4.46% ozone (w/w) 10 ml gal (32.degree. C.)surfactant (RD-88) 1 g (29.4D-limonene 65 ml liters)Carboxy-methylcelluloseacetic acidStep 5: Ozone 15 ml 13 gal 15 80.degree. F. 4.46% ozone (w/w) (49.2 (27.degree. C.)acetic acid liters)Step 6: Rinse 13 gal 3 70.degree. F. 5.26% ozone (w/w) (49.2 (21.degree. C.) liters)Step 7: Rinse 13 gal 3 60.degree. F. 7.8No chemical (49.2 (16.degree. C.)additions liters)______________________________________
The cold water wash method was conducted on a 30 pound capacity "SPEED QUEEN" washing machine. The wash method was performed on heavily soiled textiles. The method of EXAMPLE II resulted in a thoroughly cleansed and deodorized wash load.
EXAMPLE III
A method of cold water washing to clean and deodorize textiles was conducted using the same method as described in EXAMPLE II, except that the concentration of chemicals used was reduced by 50 percent. The ozone concentrations in steps 4, 5, and 6 remained constant. The heavily soiled textiles washed in EXAMPLE III were substantially similar with respect to soil content as those used in EXAMPLE II.
______________________________________ Quantity WaterOperation Used Level Time(min.) Temp pH______________________________________Step 1: Break (no 50 ml 7.75 10 105.degree. F. 8.0drain) gal (41.degree. C.)solvent (FB (29.4SPECIAL) liters)Step 2: Break 100 g 7.75 8 105.degree. F. 11.8Na metasilicate 22.5 ml gal (41.degree. C.)surfactant (RD-88) 2.5 ml (29.4surfactant 5 ml liters)(STAUNCH)D-limoneneStep 3: Rinse 13 gal 5 105.degree. F. 11.4No chemical (49.2 (41.degree. C.)additions liters)Step 4: Suds 12.5 ml 7.75 10 90.degree. F. 4.46% ozone (w/w) 5 ml gal (32.degree. C.)surfactant (RD-88) .5 g (29.4D-limonene 32.5 ml liters)Carboxy-methylcelluloseacetic acidStep 5: Ozone 7.5 ml 13 gal 15 80.degree. F. 4.46% ozone (w/w) (49.2 (27.degree. C.)acetic acid liters)Step 6: Rinse 13 gal 3 70.degree. F. 5.26% ozone (w/w) (49.2 (21.degree. C.) liters)Step 7: Rinse 13 gal 3 60.degree. F. 7.8No chemical (49.2 (16.degree. C.)additions liters)______________________________________
The results of the method of EXAMPLE III were substantially indistinguishable from the results described in EXAMPLE II.
EXAMPLE IV
A method of cold water washing to clean and deodorize textiles was conducted using the same method as described in EXAMPLE II, except that the concentration of chemicals used was increased by 100 percent. The ozone concentrations in steps 4, 5, and 6 remained constant. The heavily soiled textiles washed in EXAMPLE IV were substantially similar with respect to soil content as those used in EXAMPLE II.
______________________________________ Quantity WaterOperation Used Level Time(min.) Temp pH______________________________________Step 1: Break (no 200 ml 7.75 10 105.degree. F. 8.0drain) gal (41.degree. C.)solvent (FB Special) (29.4 liters)Step 2: Break 400 g 7.75 8 105.degree. F. 11.8Na metasilicate 90 ml gal (41.degree. C.)surfactant (RD-88) 10 ml (29.4surfactant (Staunch) 20 ml liters)D-limoneneStep 3: Rinse 13 gal 5 105.degree. F. 11.4No chemical (49.2 (41.degree. C.)additions liters)Step 4: Suds 50 ml 7.75 10 90.degree. F. 4.46% ozone (w/w) 20 ml gal (32.degree. C.)surfactant (RD-88) 2 g (29.4D-limonene 130 ml liters)Carboxy-methylcelluloseacetic acidStep 5: Ozone 30 ml 13 gal 15 80.degree. F. 4.46% ozone (w/w) (49.2 (27.degree. C.)acetic acid liters)Step 6: Rinse 13 gal 3 70.degree. F. 5.26% ozone (w/w) (49.2 (21.degree. C.) liters)Step 7: Rinse 13 gal 3 60.degree. F. 7.8No chemical (49.2 (16.degree. C.)additions liters)______________________________________
The results of the method of EXAMPLE IV were substantially indistinguishable from the results described in EXAMPLE II.
EXAMPLE V
A method of cold water washing to clean and deodorize textiles was conducted using the same method as described in EXAMPLE I, except that the organic solvent combination used in the break operation of step 1 was "RESERVE BASE" instead of "FB SPECIAL". All other ingredients, quantities, and durations were similar to those found in EXAMPLE I. The heavily soiled textiles washed in EXAMPLE V were substantially similar with respect to soil content as those used in EXAMPLE I. The results of the method of EXAMPLE V were substantially indistinguishable from the results described in EXAMPLE I.
EXAMPLE VI
A method of cold water washing to clean and deodorize textiles was conducted using the same method as described in EXAMPLE II, except that the organic solvent combination used in the break operation of step 1 was "RESERVE BASE" instead of "FB SPECIAL". All other ingredients, quantities, and durations were similar to those found in EXAMPLE II. The heavily soiled textiles washed in EXAMPLE VI were substantially similar with respect to soil content as those used in EXAMPLE II. The results of the method of EXAMPLE VI were substantially indistinguishable from the results described in EXAMPLE II.
Reference herein to specific embodiments or examples should not be interpreted as limitations to the scope of the invention, which is defined by the appended claims.
Claims
  • 1. A cold water washing formula for washing textiles in cold water, said cold water washing formula comprising:
  • ozonated cold water,
  • a surfactant,
  • an organic solvent, and
  • a sufficient amount of an acid to maintain the pH of the cold water washing formula in a range of about 3 up to 6.
  • 2. The cold water washing formula of claim 1, wherein the concentration of ozone in the ozonated cold water ranges from about 0.01 ppm to about 50 ppm.
  • 3. The cold water washing formula of claim 2, wherein said organic solvent is selected from the group consisting of petroleum-based solvents, terpene hydrocarbons, citrus-based solvents, and mixtures thereof.
  • 4. The cold water washing formula of claim 1, wherein said surfactant is a non-ionic surfactant.
  • 5. The cold water washing formula of claim 4, wherein said surfactant is selected from the group consisting of an alkyl ethoxylate and a nonylphenol surfactant present in an amount of 0.5 milliliters to about 4.0 milliliters per liter of ozonated cold water in the cold water washing formula.
  • 6. The cold water washing formula of claim 1, wherein said acid is selected from the group consisting of organic acids, mineral acids, and mixtures thereof.
  • 7. The cold water washing formula of claim 1, wherein said acid is glacial acetic acid.
  • 8. The cold water washing formula of claim 1 further including a suspending agent.
  • 9. The cold water washing formula of claim 1 further including an alkali present in an amount of about 3.0 milligrams to about 14 milligrams per liter of ozonated cold water in the cold water washing formula.
  • 10. The cold water washing formula of claim 9, wherein said alkali is selected from the group consisting of sodium metasilicate, potassium orthosilicate, sodium orthosilicate, potassium metasilicate, sodium hydroxide, potassium hydroxide, and mixtures thereof.
  • 11. A cold water washing formula for washing textiles in cold water, said cold water washing forumla comprising:
  • ozonated cold water,
  • surfactant,
  • a solvent, and
  • a sufficient amount of glacial acetic acid to maintain the pH of the cold water washing formula in a range of about 3 up to 6.
  • 12. The cold water washing formula of claim 11, wherein said solvent is selected from the group consisting of petroleum-based solvents, terpene hydrocarbons, citrus-based solvents, and mixtures thereof.
  • 13. The cold water washing formula of claim 11, wherein said surfactant is a non-ionic surfactant.
  • 14. The cold water washing formula of claim 13, wherein said surfactant is selected from the group consisting of an alkyl ethoxylate and a nonylphenol surfactant present in an amount of about 0.5 milliliters to about 4.0 milliliters per liter of ozonated cold water in the cold water washing formula.
  • 15. The cold water washing formula of claim 11 further including a suspending agent.
  • 16. The cold water washing formula of claim 11 further including an alkali present in an amount of about 3.0 milligrams to about 14 milligrams per liter of ozonated cold water in the cold water washing formula.
  • 17. The cold water washing formula of claim 16, wherein said alkali is selected from the group consisting of sodium metasilicate, potassium orthosilicate, sodium orthosilicate, potassium metasilicate, sodium hydroxide, potassium hydroxide, and mixtures thereof.
  • 18. A cold water washing formula for washing textiles in cold water, said cold water washing formula comprising:
  • ozonated cold water,
  • a surfactant,
  • a solvent selected from the group consisting of petroleum-based solvents, terpene hydrocarbons, citrus-based solvents, and mixtures thereof, and
  • a sufficient amount of an acid to maintain the pH of the cold water washing formula in a range of about 3 up to 6.
  • 19. The cold water washing formula of claim 18, wherein the concentration of ozone in the ozonated water ranges from about 0.01 ppm to about 50 ppm.
  • 20. The cold water washing formula of claim 18, wherein said surfactant is a non-ionic surfactant.
  • 21. The cold water washing formula of claim 20, wherein said surfactant is selected from the group consisting of an alkyl ethoxylate and a nonylphenol surfactant present in an amount of about 0.5 milliliters to about 4.0 milliliters per liter of ozonated cold water in the cold water washing formula.
  • 22. The cold water washing formula of claim 18, wherein said acid is selected from the group consisting of organic acids, mineral acids, and mixtures thereof.
  • 23. The cold water washing formula of claim 19, wherein said acid is glacial acetic acid.
  • 24. The cold water washing formula of claim 18 further including a suspending agent.
  • 25. The cold water washing formula of claim 18 further including an alkali present in an amount of about 3.0 milligrams to about 14 milligrams per liter of ozonated cold water in the cold water washing formula.
  • 26. The cold water washing formula of claim 25, wherein said alkali is selected from the group consisting of sodium metasilicate, potassium orthosilicate, sodium orthosilicate, potassium metasilicate, sodium hydroxide, potassium hydroxide, and mixtures thereof.
US Referenced Citations (161)
Number Name Date Kind
1096991 Blanchard May 1914
1823352 Crespi et al. Sep 1931
2189017 Rivat Feb 1940
2529802 Glass Nov 1950
3065620 Houser Nov 1962
3130570 Rentzepis Apr 1964
3194628 Cannon Jul 1965
3226842 Morey Jan 1966
3606996 Wolf Sep 1971
3659096 Kompanek Apr 1972
3674216 Blair Jul 1972
3778229 Webster et al. Dec 1973
3780308 Nablo Dec 1973
3836786 Lowther Sep 1974
3875303 Hieber Apr 1975
3877152 Gorman Apr 1975
3891561 Lowther Jun 1975
3899683 Lowther Aug 1975
3903426 Lowther Sep 1975
3904521 Stopka Sep 1975
3916652 Speakman Nov 1975
3919433 Senior Nov 1975
3954586 Lowther May 1976
3960673 Morrow et al. Jun 1976
3984697 Lowther Oct 1976
3996474 Lowther Dec 1976
3998714 Armstrong Dec 1976
4003832 Henderson et al. Jan 1977
4013567 Emelyanov et al. Mar 1977
4021347 Teller et al. May 1977
4035296 Armstrong Jul 1977
4035301 Armstrong Jul 1977
4045347 Armstrong Aug 1977
4053399 Donnelly et al. Oct 1977
4076617 Bybel et al. Feb 1978
4100073 Hopcroft Jul 1978
4101296 Lowther Jul 1978
4139405 Seiberling Feb 1979
4141686 Lewis Feb 1979
4145007 Jetzer Mar 1979
4159944 Erickson et al. Jul 1979
4171056 Hannon et al. Oct 1979
4204955 Armstrong May 1980
4214330 Thorsen Jul 1980
4219415 Nassef et al. Aug 1980
4227653 Jetzer Oct 1980
4242310 Greff et al. Dec 1980
4244712 Tongret Jan 1981
4255663 Lewis Mar 1981
4265747 Copa et al. May 1981
4283251 Singh Aug 1981
4300367 Thorsen Nov 1981
4304673 Reynolds et al. Dec 1981
4340489 Adams et al. Jul 1982
4343765 Elston et al. Aug 1982
4363322 Andersson Dec 1982
4375812 Vaseen et al. Mar 1983
4379129 Abe Apr 1983
4384943 Stoner et al. May 1983
4411756 Bennett et al. Oct 1983
4434086 Hill et al. Feb 1984
4462880 Hill et al. Jul 1984
4476041 Hill et al. Oct 1984
4488973 Hill et al. Dec 1984
4504446 Kunicki et al. Mar 1985
4535247 Kurtz Aug 1985
4578185 Wilson et al. Mar 1986
4595498 Cohen et al. Jun 1986
4617230 Shah et al. Oct 1986
4623515 Frei et al. Nov 1986
4625432 Baltes Dec 1986
4675023 Hyink Jun 1987
4752401 Bodenstein Jun 1988
4767405 Lokken Aug 1988
4772411 Sprecker et al. Sep 1988
4780277 Tanaka et al. Oct 1988
4804449 Sweeney Feb 1989
4813210 Masuda et al. Mar 1989
4818488 Jacob Apr 1989
4822563 Joslyn Apr 1989
4849237 Hurst Jul 1989
4869872 Baltes Sep 1989
4881941 Dixon Nov 1989
4912058 Mussi et al. Mar 1990
4915955 Gomori Apr 1990
4917586 Jacob Apr 1990
4941270 Hoffman Jul 1990
4954321 Jensen Sep 1990
4962090 Sprecker et al. Oct 1990
4963285 Sprecker et al. Oct 1990
4966717 Kern Oct 1990
4976920 Jacob Dec 1990
4990494 Narula et al. Feb 1991
4995123 Kern Feb 1991
5004587 Tacchi Apr 1991
5008548 Gat Apr 1991
5014211 Turner et al. May 1991
5024766 Mahmud Jun 1991
5041483 Burch Aug 1991
5053140 Hurst Oct 1991
5073488 Matner et al. Dec 1991
5089098 Tacchi Feb 1992
5089162 Rapisarda et al. Feb 1992
5097556 Engel et al. Mar 1992
5107605 Yamada et al. Apr 1992
5118322 Wasinger et al. Jun 1992
5123176 Yamada et al. Jun 1992
5154895 Moon Oct 1992
5171525 Jacob Dec 1992
5180502 Nishiki et al. Jan 1993
5181399 Engel et al. Jan 1993
5187137 Terui et al. Feb 1993
5200158 Jacob Apr 1993
5207237 Langford May 1993
5211919 Conrad May 1993
5213773 Burris May 1993
5223401 Foltz et al. Jun 1993
5236512 Rogers et al. Aug 1993
5241720 Engel et al. Sep 1993
5244585 Sugimoto Sep 1993
5245845 Langford Sep 1993
5252484 Matner et al. Oct 1993
5258409 Gay Nov 1993
5261925 Wasinger et al. Nov 1993
5262129 Terada et al. Nov 1993
5280876 Atkins Jan 1994
5286447 Fannin et al. Feb 1994
5286700 Terui et al. Feb 1994
5302343 Jacob Apr 1994
5306471 Harbert et al. Apr 1994
5313811 Wasinger et al. May 1994
5322637 O'Grady Jun 1994
5325600 Gentile Jul 1994
5332511 Gay et al. Jul 1994
5342415 Wasinger et al. Aug 1994
5348724 Hagimori et al. Sep 1994
5353745 Fahs, II Oct 1994
5360556 Ball et al. Nov 1994
5366746 Mendenhall Nov 1994
5370793 Sugimoto Dec 1994
5373025 Gay Dec 1994
5384933 Wang Jan 1995
5387350 Mason Feb 1995
5393490 Jacob Feb 1995
5404732 Kim Apr 1995
5409616 Garbutt et al. Apr 1995
5422068 Shalaby et al. Jun 1995
5422185 Egami et al. Jun 1995
5423902 Strutz et al. Jun 1995
5424515 Gentile Jun 1995
5427693 Mansgrover et al. Jun 1995
5433866 Hoppe et al. Jul 1995
5433919 Baltes Jul 1995
5433927 Mausgrover et al. Jul 1995
5443801 Langford Aug 1995
5444102 Nimitz et al. Aug 1995
5451368 Jacob Sep 1995
5456809 Cooper Oct 1995
5460705 Murphy et al. Oct 1995
5484549 Hei et al. Jan 1996
5493743 Schneider et al. Feb 1996
Foreign Referenced Citations (2)
Number Date Country
6-313194 Nov 1994 JPX
WO 9506712 Mar 1995 WOX
Non-Patent Literature Citations (5)
Entry
Jodlowski et al., "Possibilities of Decolorization of Dye Wastes from the Textile Industry Using the Ozonation Method," Przeglad Wlokienniczy: 1979, pp. 37-39, pp. Engl. Tr. 1-13, 1979 (Month Unknown).
Kurbiel, "Removal of Color, Detergents, and Other Refractory Substances form Textile Wastewater," EPA-600/2-78-072, pp. i-xiv, and 248-314, Mar. 1978.
Laundry Logic, Inc., "Laundry Logic Ozone Injection Systems," Bulletin No. OM-105, pp. 1-6, and 16 pages of tables. (Date Unknown).
Nazarov et al., "Ozonization of Waste (Sewage) in Textile Industry", Tekstilnaia promushlennost, pp. 1-13 and 52-56, Jun. 1984.
Rice et al., "Analytical Aspects of Ozone Treatment of Water and Wastewater," Lewis Publishers, Inc., pp. 41-90, 129-159, and 245-255, 1986. (Month Unknown).