Collapsible crustacean trap

Information

  • Patent Grant
  • 7886480
  • Patent Number
    7,886,480
  • Date Filed
    Friday, October 2, 2009
    15 years ago
  • Date Issued
    Tuesday, February 15, 2011
    14 years ago
Abstract
An improved crustacean, fish & animal trap comprising a collapsible hoop and mesh structure to minimize storage size. The invention is unique in that it collapses through the manipulation of flexible hoops to a size minimized in all three dimensions. The primary configurations would be for crab, prawns and lobster/crayfish; however, in slightly different configurations, can be used to catch or cage animals, fish and other crustaceans. Another embodiment of the trap would feature only one hoop and would be used as a “lift trap.”
Description
BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION

The non-commercial trapping of crustaceans is a pastime enjoyed by thousands of people worldwide. One of the few inhibiting factors in this pursuit is the nature of the crustacean trap itself. It is often bulky and awkward to carry and store. The collapsible crustacean trap solves these problems. There are many collapsible crustacean traps on the market today but most of them do not form into the ultimate shape or size. The ultimate shape being a circular trap so that the crustaceans can easily circle and find the entrance. The ultimate size being large enough so that large amounts of bait can be placed in it and still have adequate separation from the outside wall causing the crustaceans to realize they must find an entrance to get to the food. Patented square/rectangular collapsing traps include inventions by Eric C. Wass (U.S. Pat. No. 706,299), Alan N. McKenzie (U.S. Pat. No. 571,264), John O. Jonason (U.S. Pat. No. 176,434) and Gerald J Cheramie (Patent Application 20040881995). These traps are often complicated to assemble and are not as efficient as circular traps (proven by the commercial designs). There are circular collapsible traps on the market like that envisioned by Charles Ponzo (U.S. Pat. No. 4,587,758) but they only incorporate a single stage of collapsing making it bulky for storing. Ladner Traps of Delta, British Columbia, Canada, also have a circular trap that collapses and folds in half. This design is an improvement on others but still lacks the assembled volume of the present invention and is considerably larger when collapsed in its storage state.


BRIEF SUMMARY OF INVENTION

The present invention, in its standard double hoop configuration, is superior to all existing collapsing traps as it is circular in design and easily has the best volume expansion ratio of approximately 25:1. Most collapsing traps have only one stage of collapsing, namely reducing its size in two dimensions only. The present invention adds another stage of collapsing to allow it to minimize in all dimensions. The present invention, because of its superior collapsibility, is well suited to applications where there are storage limitations such as in cruisers, sailboats, tenders, kayaks, canoes, floatplanes, automobiles, and recreational vehicles or when traveling in general.


The present invention, once assembled, can be deployed into the water and let down to settle on the seafloor/freshwater floor. A rope affixed to a bridal, which in turn is affixed to the trap, generally controls the deployment. A float can be attached to the upper end of the rope if the trap is to be left unattended.


The present invention is a portable frame and mesh trap defined by its unique collapsibility. Its collapsibility is obtained from the manipulation of a flexible hoop or hoops that typically cuts its height by 90% (for the double hoop embodiment) and its diameter by 50% (for all embodiments), bettering its storage ability. There are two main embodiments of this trap: single hoop (an open ‘lift trap’) and double hoop (similar to a standard enclosed circular trap). The uniqueness of the trap is derived mostly from the second stage in folding the trap for storage. The first stage, common in traps, is releasing struts to allow the top of the trap to nest with the bottom of the trap, reducing its size vertically. The typical process in stage two in collapsing the hoop(s) would be to grasp opposite sides (looking at the hoop(s) as a clock, grasp them at the 3 & 9 o'clock positions) and force them together with a slight twist to form a figure eight. A clamp may be used to secure the created waist. Fold the outside curves (originally at the 12 & 6 o'clock positions) of the figure eight toward one another until they are touching. A clamp may be used to secure the hoop(s) together at this point as well. The other necessary parts of the trap are incorporated into the resulting minimized package.


The present invention is distinct from all other traps in the method by which it is collapsed and conversely setup. The method is similar to the folding and storing of a band saw blade. It is also similar to the method defining the invention described by U.S. Pat. No. 4,815,784 for an automobile sunshade. In this patent a sunshield is collapsed by twisting and folding similar members to attain dramatically reduced size dimensions.


The primary configurations for the present invention would be for crabs, prawns, lobsters and crayfish. These traps, in slightly different configurations, can be used to catch and/or contain animals, fish and other crustaceans. The entrance means can be any structure applied to the opening that allows the species to be captured (target species) to enter the trap and not be able to escape unless regulations require otherwise. These structures include, but are not restricted to: mesh funnels, swinging one-way gates and plastic overlapping fingers such as a neptune's trigger. Any species that are meant to be trapped by the present invention are referred to in the Claims as objects.





BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE SEVERAL VIEWS OF THE DRAWING


FIG. 1 illustrates a complete view of crab trap 100, the primary embodiment of the present invention when fully assembled.



FIG. 2A illustrates the first step of collapsing crab trap 100. This and subsequent drawings may not depict netting in order that other prime features are easily identified.



FIG. 2B illustrates the second step of collapsing crab trap 100.



FIG. 3A illustrates the continuation of the collapsing process from the second step to the third.



FIG. 3B illustrates the continuation of the collapsing process from the third step to the fourth step.



FIG. 3C illustrates the continuation of the collapsing process from the fourth step to the fifth step.



FIG. 3D illustrates the continuation of the collapsing process from the fifth step to the sixth step.



FIG. 4 illustrates a large-scale diagram of the frame struts and gates used in crab trap 100.



FIG. 5 illustrates a secondary embodiment of the present invention, being crab trap 200, wherein mesh funnels are incorporated instead of gates to create ingress and prevent egress of objects to be captured.



FIG. 6 illustrates a tertiary embodiment of the present invention, being crab trap 300, wherein a single hoop is used to create what is commonly known as a ‘lift trap’.





DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF DRAWINGS

Although the disclosure hereof is detailed and exact to enable those skilled in the art to practice the invention, the physical embodiments herein disclosed merely exemplify the invention that may be embodied in other specific structure. While the preferred embodiment has been described, the details may be changed without departing from the invention, which is defined by the Claims.



FIG. 1 illustrates a collapsible crab trap 100, the primary embodiment of the present invention. As shown in FIG. 1 the crab trap 100 is substantially formed by two 1×19 strand stainless steel wire ropes. The ends of each of the wire ropes are joined together by a crimped stainless steel tube, crimp 38, such that the two wire ropes form a top hoop 21 and bottom hoop 22. In its assembled state, FIG. 1, crab trap 100 has the top hoop 21 positioned parallel directly above the bottom hoop 22. Top hoop 21 and bottom hoop 22 are held separated by struts. The struts comprise three stainless steel frames, frames 26, positioned equidistantly around the hoops. Frames 26 consist of stainless steel rod running vertical from a hinge 30 on the bottom hoop 22 to the top hoop 21, followed by a 90° bend to follow the top hoop 21 and finally, a further 90° bend downward to connect with hinge 30 on the bottom hoop 22. Hinge 30 consists of a loop in the stainless steel rod of frame 26 around bottom hoop 22. There would be six hinges 30, two on the bottom of each of the three frames 26. The frames 26 are fastened to the bottom hoop 22 by hinge 30 and to the top hoop 21 by hanger 32. Hanger 32 is a facet of frame 26, located one in each top corner of the frame 26 and facing inward, so as to hold up top hoop 21. As there are six hinges 30 on the bottom of the frames there are six hangers 32 at the top. Elastomeric tension lines 24 run adjacent to each side of frames 26 and are connected to the top hoop 21 and bottom hoop 22. Elastomeric tension lines 24 provide tension between the top hoop 21 and bottom hoop 22 so that the top hoop remains firmly in hangers 32. This tension also creates rigidity in the trap. An alternate frame 26 can be permanently attached to the top flexible hoop 21 and the bottom flexible hoop 22 and have the ability to fold to allow the top flexible hoop 21 to lie on the bottom flexible hoop 22.


Crab trap 100 in FIG. 1 comprises of three stainless steel gates 25 that are suspended on gate hinges 31 on frames 26. Gates 25 swing inward to provide ingress for crabs but will block egress by not swinging outward. Details of the gates 25 will be given with description of FIG. 4. Gate 36 illustrates the swinging gate in the open position.



FIG. 1 illustrates the preferred manner of enclosing the trap. Mesh netting 29 would be used to enclose the top and bottom of crab trap 100 as well as portions of the sides outside the frames 26. Biodegradable mesh netting 28, which will degrade within weeks in a sub marine environment, may be employed in the top half of the area within frame 26 to allow crustaceans to exit the trap if it is abandoned or lost.



FIG. 1 illustrates a bait container 27 that is placed inside the trap and clipped onto the mesh netting 29 near the middle of the bottom hoop 22. The bait container would generally be comprised of a plastic mesh envelope that crustacean attractants could be placed within.



FIG. 1 also illustrates the components of crab trap 100 necessary for its deployment and retrieval. Lifting ring 34 is the upper terminus for the three ropes forming the lifting bridal 33. The lifting bridal 33 is attached to the trap by stainless steel lifting points 23, which are welded to the top of frame 26. A retrieval line or pole can be attached to lifting ring 34 to deploy and retrieve the trap.



FIG. 1 illustrates clasps 35 at four equidistant points around the bottom hoop 22. They are molded plastic clasps that fastened together to aid in the collapsing process.


Most collapsing crab traps have only one stage of collapsing, namely reducing their size in two dimensions only. Crab trap 100 adds another stage of collapsing to allow it to minimize in all dimensions. FIGS. 2A and 2B illustrate the first stage. FIGS. 3A, 3B, 3C and 3D illustrate the second stage.



FIGS. 2A and 2B illustrate the first two steps in collapsing crab trap 100. The collapsing process is a key in the uniqueness of the present invention. Top hoop 21 must be lowered onto bottom hoop 22 before the trap is flexed and than folded into its storing configuration, which is its most minimized form. To do this, the top hoop 21 must be lifted off and inward of the six hangers 32, there being two hangers on each frame 26. The frames 26 are than folded out and down, hinging on hinges 30 on the bottom hoop 22. The best time to remove crabs and the bait container is after the first frame is swung away as there is good access to the interior of the trap and it will still be in an erect state. Once all the frames 26 have been folded out, the top hoop 21 will naturally drop onto the bottom hoop 22. FIG. 2B illustrates this stage in collapsing. The elastomeric tension lines 24 become slack as the top hoop 21 descends to the lower hoop 22. The removable bait container 27 is shown outside the trap in FIG. 2B.



FIGS. 3A, 3B, 3C and 3D illustrate the continuation of the procedure to minimize crab trap 100 illustrated in FIGS. 2A and 2B. The typical process in these steps in collapsing the hoops would be to grasp opposite sides of the two aligned hoops 21 & 22, indicated by the clasp 35 positions in FIG. 1, (looking at the hoops as a clock, grasp them at 3 & 9 o'clock positions) as shown in FIG. 3A and force them together until clasps 35 can be fastened. Fastening the opposing clasps carries the force required to flex the wire hoops inward allowing an easy transition to twisting the hourglass shaped hoops into a figure eight as shown in FIG. 3B. Fold the outside curves (originally at 12 & 6 o'clock positions) of the figure eight toward one another until they are touching as shown in FIG. 3C. The two remaining clasps may now be secured. Frames 26 can now be folded on top and below. The resulting configuration is the complete minimization of crab trap 100 as shown in FIG. 3D.



FIG. 4 comprises a detailed illustration of a frame 26 of crab trap 100. Frame 26 supports gate 25, through which crustaceans enter the trap. The three-sided frame 26 is hinged on the bottom hoop 22 by hinge 30. The top hoop 21 is secured by tension lines 24 in hangers 32 on each side at the top of frame 26. The top of gate 25 is a stainless rod 41 that pivots on gate hinges 31. Two separated vertical stainless steel rods 43 are welded at their top ends to rod 41. Bisecting and welded to the two vertical rods 43 is stainless steel rod 42. Its span exceeds that of the width of the frame 26 so that it cannot swing outside the trap thus preventing egress of the captured crustaceans. The top hoop 21, bottom hoop 22 and tension lines 24 are threaded through mesh netting 29. Biodegradable mesh netting 28 is used in the top half of frame 26 to prevent the long-term confinement of crustaceans in the event that the crab trap is abandoned or lost.



FIG. 5 illustrates crab trap 200, the secondary embodiment of the present invention, wherein the primary components of the crab trap remain the same except for gates 25 and degradable mesh 28 (illustrated in FIG. 1), which are replaced with small mesh netting formed to the shape of a funnel 37 in a horizontal axis. The entrance of the trap is formed by threading the large diameter end of the mesh funnel onto the frame 26 and the small diameter end onto a stainless steel ring 44 positioned inside the trap midway between the top hoop 21 and bottom hoop 22. The ring 44 is kept suspended by lateral tension introduced by internal elastomeric tension lines 39. Crabs follow the scent emitted from the bait trap 27 into the funnel 37, climbing up a gentle slope, and passing through ring 44 into the interior of the trap. A biodegradable mesh 28 exit would exist on the top of the trap stitched into standard mesh netting 29.


Crab trap 200 is collapsed, as is crab trap 100, by removing the frames 26. The funnels are fully deformable once the tension lines 39 are released. The full procedure to minimize the trap is the same as crab trap 100 (illustrated with FIGS. 2A, 2B, 3A, 3B, 3C and 3D).


Both crab trap 100 and 200 can easily be transformed into other crustacean traps by varying the mesh netting size and strength. Prawns could be caught with smaller mesh incorporated into the design whereas lobster would need a stronger mesh. Typically, the flexible mesh is nylon or polyester netting. The biodegradable mesh is typically cotton netting.



FIG. 6 illustrates crab trap 300, the simplest embodiment of the present invention. Commonly called a lift trap, it is widely used on docks or areas where there is an abundance of crab. Crab trap 300 consists of a stainless steel wire rope formed into a hoop 40 where the two ends are joined with a stainless steel crimp 38. Hoop 40 is threaded through the perimeter of mesh netting 29. The mesh netting should form a dip or pocket so that, when it is raised from the bottom of the seafloor, it makes it difficult for the crabs to escape over the perimeter, especially if the trap is brought up quickly forcing water pressure on them. Crab trap 300 may consist of two hoops arranged in a manner to form a short mesh wall to prevent the escape of the target species when it is lifted.


Crab trap 300 collapses by the same method as crab trap 100 in FIGS. 3A, 3B, 3C and 3D only easier as there is only one hoop to flex and fold.


Crab trap 300, as illustrated in FIG. 6, utilizes a bait trap 27, and the same lifting mechanisms as crab trap 100 and 200, namely lifting points 23, bridal 33, and lifting ring 34. A line, in turn, can be attached to lifting ring 34 to aid in deployment.


Crab traps 100, 200 and 300 have structures primarily made of stainless steel, as this material is better suited to the marine environment then most materials as it is less prone to degradation. However, composite materials, plastics, reinforced plastics/rubber and a combination of steel and plastics could easily be used to make any part of the trap including the flexible hoops. These traps are scalable in size to fit different applications.

Claims
  • 1. A collapsible trap comprising: an upper resilient hoop;a lower resilient hoop;one or more passageways to allow for entry by animals into said trap;two or more detachable hinged connectors, wherein said connectors are attached to retain said upper hoop and said lower hoop in a spaced, substantially parallel relationship when said trap is extended and said one or more passageways are arranged perpendicularly to said upper hoop and said lower hoop when said trap is extended;wherein said upper hoop and said lower hoop form a substantially coaxial arrangement, comprising a first side and a second side opposite to said first side, when said connectors are detached from one or both of said upper hoop and said lower hoop; andwherein said first side and said second side are adapted to be compressed towards one another to form a substantially hourglass configuration comprising a first lobe and a second lobe; andwherein said first lobe is adapted to be twisted with respect to said second lobe about a longitudinal axis of said substantially hourglass configuration and folded onto said second lobe about a centre of said substantially hourglass configuration.
  • 2. The collapsible trap of claim 1, further comprising a flexible mesh, wherein said flexible mesh substantially encloses a space between said upper hoop and said lower hoop when said trap is extended.
  • 3. The collapsible trap of claim 1, wherein said one or more passageways are tapered.
  • 4. The collapsible trap of claim 1, wherein said one or more passageways comprise flexible walls.
  • 5. A collapsible trap comprising: an upper resilient hoop;a lower resilient hoop;one or more passageways to allow for entry by animals into said trap;two or more detachable hinged connectors, wherein said connectors are attached to retain said upper hoop and said lower hoop in a spaced, substantially parallel relationship when said trap is extended and said one or more passageways are arranged perpendicularly to said upper hoop and said lower hoop when said trap is extended;wherein said upper hoop and said lower hoop form a substantially coaxial arrangement, comprising a first side and a second side opposite to said first side, when said connectors are detached from one or both of said upper hoop and said lower hoop; andwherein said first side and said second side are adapted to be compressed together to form a substantially lemniscate structure comprising a first lobe and a second lobe; andwherein said first lobe is adapted to be twisted with respect to said second lobe about a longitudinal axis of said substantially lemniscate structure and folded onto said second lobe about a centre of said substantially lemniscate structure.
  • 6. The collapsible trap of claim 5, further comprising a flexible mesh, wherein said flexible mesh substantially encloses a space between said upper hoop and said lower hoop when said trap is extended.
  • 7. The collapsible trap of claim 5, wherein said one or more passageways are tapered.
  • 8. The collapsible trap of claim 5, wherein said one or more passageways comprise flexible walls.
CROSS-REFERENCE TO RELATED APPLICATIONS

This application is a divisional of U.S. application Ser. No. 11/961,721 filed Dec. 20, 2007, now U.S. Pat. No. 7,610,716 which is a divisional of U.S. application Ser. No. 11/285,994 filed Nov. 23, 2005, now abandoned which claims the benefit of U.S. Provisional Application No. 60/631,070, filed Nov. 26, 2004.

US Referenced Citations (69)
Number Name Date Kind
664926 Briggs Jan 1901 A
690507 Zangenberg Jan 1902 A
850123 Algate Apr 1907 A
1691904 Gamble Nov 1928 A
1985177 Lawrence Dec 1934 A
2716304 Taylor Aug 1955 A
2760297 Buyken Aug 1956 A
2769274 Ougland Nov 1956 A
2814899 Brosius Dec 1957 A
2910801 Safarik et al. Nov 1959 A
3373523 Olafson Mar 1968 A
3440758 Prince Apr 1969 A
3541721 Sexauer Nov 1970 A
3786593 Gerbrandt Jan 1974 A
3795073 Olsen Mar 1974 A
3960161 Norman Jun 1976 A
3990463 Norman Nov 1976 A
4021956 Hogg May 1977 A
4030232 Niva Jun 1977 A
4134225 Welch Jan 1979 A
4221071 Sjolund Sep 1980 A
4237646 Mims, III Dec 1980 A
4354325 Aho Oct 1982 A
4554760 Ponzo Nov 1985 A
4604823 Ponzo Aug 1986 A
4825892 Norman May 1989 A
4858634 McLeese Aug 1989 A
4864770 Serio Sep 1989 A
4951333 Kaiser et al. Aug 1990 A
5056172 Kaiser et al. Oct 1991 A
5059463 Peters Oct 1991 A
5137044 Brady Aug 1992 A
5218781 Miller Jun 1993 A
5249592 Springer et al. Oct 1993 A
5411046 Wan May 1995 A
5478273 Ives Dec 1995 A
5579799 Zheng Dec 1996 A
5645096 Hazinski et al. Jul 1997 A
5771627 Mattson et al. Jun 1998 A
5924237 Ives Jul 1999 A
6109282 Yoon Aug 2000 A
6199229 Wong Mar 2001 B1
6357510 Zheng Mar 2002 B1
6502596 Danaher Jan 2003 B1
6604537 Zheng Aug 2003 B2
6662488 Heimbrock et al. Dec 2003 B1
6705039 Campbell Mar 2004 B1
6786000 Hong Sep 2004 B1
6851136 Brereton Feb 2005 B2
7040333 Ransom et al. May 2006 B1
7152733 Trickett Dec 2006 B2
7174584 Danaher Feb 2007 B2
7225823 Ransom et al. Jun 2007 B1
7243384 Le Gette et al. Jul 2007 B2
7246630 Ransom et al. Jul 2007 B1
7313887 Hibbs et al. Jan 2008 B2
7365967 Zheng Apr 2008 B2
7533486 Ribeiro De Matos May 2009 B2
7610716 Philbrook Nov 2009 B2
20010013360 Gupta et al. Aug 2001 A1
20020139032 Campbell Oct 2002 A1
20040181995 Cheramie Sep 2004 A1
20060037553 Miller et al. Feb 2006 A1
20060112610 Philbrook Jun 2006 A1
20060288634 Wimbus et al. Dec 2006 A1
20070079858 Chu et al. Apr 2007 A1
20070261292 December Nov 2007 A1
20080113582 Campbell May 2008 A1
20080216388 Thorsen Sep 2008 A1
Foreign Referenced Citations (13)
Number Date Country
19844036 Apr 1999 DE
2775871 Sep 1999 FR
2396092 Jun 2004 GB
07313016 Dec 1995 JP
08266190 Oct 1996 JP
2006109836 Apr 2006 JP
2006197801 Aug 2006 JP
2008011747 Jan 2008 JP
WO 8707818 Dec 1987 WO
WO 8904603 Jun 1989 WO
WO 9418825 Sep 1994 WO
WO 2006064293 Jun 2006 WO
WO 2007078255 Jul 2007 WO
Related Publications (1)
Number Date Country
20100018106 A1 Jan 2010 US
Provisional Applications (1)
Number Date Country
60631070 Nov 2004 US
Divisions (2)
Number Date Country
Parent 11961721 Dec 2007 US
Child 12572553 US
Parent 11285994 Nov 2005 US
Child 11961721 US