The present invention pertains to personal dive buoys and like open water surface markers. In particular, the invention regards inflatable dive buoys that are collapsible when not in use to provide a small size for ease of storage and portability.
Recreational diving, both with and without specialized underwater breathing equipment, is a sport found throughout the world and in most every body of water. When diving in open waters, such as with SCUBA equipment, a diver generally marks his location by use of a floating marker or buoy. This is a safety precaution to assure that any approaching boats do not overrun the diver. Many areas require, by statute or local regulation, that all divers be accompanied by a “diver down” flag visible above the water's surface. This is typically supported from a dive boat or a floating buoy or raft.
Various signal or flag-supporting dive floats and buoys are taught in the prior art as represented by U.S. Pat. No. 5,516,316 to Rumminger; No. 5,735,719 to Berg; No. 4,144,606 to McIntyre; No. 4,123,813 to Adams; and 6,273,773 to Bourke. One difficulty that any dive buoy design must address is the problem of supporting a flag in an upright orientation. Due both the inherent weight and height of any usefully sized flag, there is a tendency for a flag to fall over, either by distorting its base, or overturning its base. This problem is heightened in the presence of any but the lightest wind. This problem is addressed in prior designs in primarily two ways: 1) with a wide base support structure together with a rigid flag pole connection, or 2) by a below-surface counterweight. Retaining a flag pole in an upright orientation may be made easier by use of a rigid float as the buoyancy element. However, a rigid float is inconvenient for handling and storing before and after use, due to both its rigidity, and its inherently larger than convenient size. Several prior dive floats rely on a counterweight or anchor with minimal flagpole base support, such as the device of Rumminger (see above) on which a flag is mounted on the top of an inflated body. However, such a design is too easily overturned in the lightest wind. A design that provides good flag support is that taught in the Adams patent, which uses an inflatable annular float with a center flag support. However, the Adams design, and most inflatable buoys, are susceptible to damage and failure from puncture of the float. Once the float skin is punctured the entire device is disabled and lost for use.
An additional design issue with dive buoys is the need and desire to reduce their handling and storage size. Recreational diving with SCUBA equipment requires a large number and volume of specialized equipment. Transportation of this equipment is a burden that reduces the enjoyment of the sport for many people. Reflecting this, specialized gear bags have evolved to storage and transport personal diving equipment. There is a need to provide equipment that requires a minimum of space to reduce the equipment handling effort. Most dive floats available today are too bulky and add greatly to a diver's equipment burden. Most compact and easily stored dive floats rely on inflatable float elements that are not durable and therefore unreliable. What is needed is an improved dive float including a diver-down flag that is both durable and collapsible for easy handling and storage.
The present invention is an inflatable dive float with a supported flag that is collapsible to a small size for ease of handling and storage. The dive float includes a novel buoyancy element formed of a durable flexible cover and lightweight replaceable bladder. The cover is configured to allow easy replacement of the bladder. Due to the protection of the durable cover and the ease of replacement, the bladder may be provided by a conventional and easily obtained balloon. A collapsible frame element internal to the cover provides rigid support for a flag pole and connection to a rigid counterweight staff. The internal frame element is held in place, during use, by the pressure of the inflated bladder. Deflation of the bladder allows collapsing of the frame element and the cover which provides a greatly reduced geometry for storage and handling after use. Both the flag pole and counterweight staff are preferably collapsible as well to reduce storage dimensions.
In a preferred embodiment, buoyancy is provided by a spherical cover formed of thin flexible plastic, mesh or fabric cloth. The collapsible frame consists of a single curved frame arm extending between and rigidly supporting a flag pole and counterweight staff. The frame arm hinges at its middle to enable collapse of the arm and float. The frame arm is supported, in use, between the cover and an inflated internal bladder by the pressure of the bladder against the cover. A typical entertainment “party” balloon provides the bladder. The flag pole and counterweight staff are both removeable and collapsible. The entire dive float and flag are configured to collapse to a maximum linear dimension of less than 8 inches for convenience of storage.
The invention includes a dive float kit including a number of replaceable balloons to be inserted into the cover before use as bladders. Additional novel aspects and benefits of the invention will be discerned from the following description of particular embodiments and the accompanying figures.
To retain flotation air a thin, lightweight bladder 14 is used inside the cover 12. The present design is intended to benefit from the low cost and ready availability of novelty balloons and the like that are typically formed of thin latex rubber or similar elastic materials. Because a dive float is typically used for short time periods, an extremely low air loss bladder is not necessary. Similarly, because high pressure is not needed, a balloon that is filled by mouth using a person's breath force is sufficient. As a consequence, the use of a balloon bladder is adequate and therefore beneficial for its low cost.
An additional benefit of using a balloon bladder is that it may be easily and cheaply replaced in case of loss, puncture or deterioration from environmental conditions. To reflect this aspect of the invention,
While the low pressure air of the bladder 14 within the cover 12 is sufficient to provide proper buoyancy, a cover 12 so filled is not sufficiently rigid by itself, to properly support an extended dive signal device. The dive float of
In assembly of the dive float, the internal frame 40 in located inside the cover (for clarity not shown in
The lower arm portion 42 terminates at its lower end with a like structure that captures the cover 12 at the perimeter of a lower hole 56 that is diametrically opposite the upper hole 54. Extending rigidly from the respective securing nuts 49 are the base elements of the flagpole 25 and staff 30. These are shown truncated in
The frame 40 is rigidly connected to the associated support pads and has sufficient rigidity and strength that, together with the support afforded by the bladder pressure and tension in the cover 12 when inflated, the flagpole 25 and staff 30 are rigidly linked and will not appreciably overturn at their bases during use even in high wind conditions. To maximize the support to the frame 40 from the cover 12 and inflated bladder 14, the frame arm portion 41, 42 are curved to match, and bear against, the inside surface of the cover 12. This configuration minimizes the necessary size and support of the arms themselves such that a single frame arm is sufficient. As well, the support to the frame sufficient to allow the arm portions 41, 42 to be pivotably joined. The arms 41, 42 may be entirely unconnected to the cover 12 itself. This configuration makes the dive float easy to collapse when the bladder is deflated, as the arms' support is thereby released and they are then allowed to fold at the hinge 43. The manner of folding of the arms 41, 42 after deflation is indicated by the movement arrows in
For a suggested dive float having a float body of the above suggested size, the following parameters define an acceptable internal frame structure. The support pad outer diameter (or nominal width) is suggested to be in the range of 1.5 to 2 inches. Because of their being partially supported in use by the inflated bladder and therefore somewhat prevented from bending, the arms 41, 42 may be relatively small in cross-section. The arms are suggested to be of flat cross-section having a width of 0.75 to 1 inches and an orthogonal (radial) dimension in the range of 0.125 to 0.25 inches. Other cross-section shapes having similar bending sections are also applicable. Larger, stiffer elements are not necessary and detract from weight and size demands of the invention. The above dimensions are suggested for an internal frame formed of the material polyethylene. Other materials, including, but not limited to other metal alloys and high strength industrial plastics such as nylon or polyvinylchloride (PVC) may also be used; the dimensions may be then adjusted on an equal stiffness basis. Any material used should have corrosion resistant properties and be generally durable.
The support pad 44 and capture plate 46 and the method of engaging the cover 12 and flagpole 25 as shown, is only one example of a structure meeting the functions of the invention. Other support pad configurations that provide a broad area of engagement with cover 12 at the flagpole base and that is rigidly connected to an extended rigid arm between the cover and bladder may provide the same benefit. The capture plate 46 and securing nut 49 may, alternatively take other forms, including being integrated into a single piece. Other devices or structures for joining a broad base support such as the support pad 44 to the cover 12 are contemplated. For example, a support pad may be secured to the inside of the cover by adhesive bonding with a mating capture element and pole base similarly bonded to the outside of the cover. Such a configuration will provide the same result in a cover not having the holes needed for pass-through of the vertical post 48 as discussed above. In yet another alternative, the function of the support pad and capture plate may be combined in a single structure integral with a cover; the support element being essentially a cover area of increased thickness and rigidity. Such a construction may be produced in molded plastic.
The flagpole 25 and counterweight staff 30 must be sufficiently stiff and strong to maintain shape under bending load of the associated flag 24 and counterweight 32. Preferably, the flagpole 25 and staff 30 are formed of multiple collapsible subparts to allow reduction to a smaller geometry. The mating ends of each subpart preferably include, and interconnect with, releasable threaded connectors 33 to ensure rigidity during use. Other releasable connectors, such as what are commonly known as “quarter-turn” locking connectors may also be used. For convenience, a multi-part flagpole or staff is suggested to include an internal elastic cord 34 to retain the parts when disassembled (the staff 30 in
The embodiment of the figures discussed herein illustrates a generally spherical dive float. This shape is greatly preferred as lending itself well to easily available balloons as a bladder means—such balloons being typically rounded and easily fitting within a spherical cover. However, the novel concepts of the inventive dive float, and the advantages of a dive float with an internal collapsible frame, may be extended to dive floats of other geometries.
A dive buoy typically includes a line or leash by which a diver user tows the buoy or retains it near the dive location. In the present invention, a leash may be attached in any of a variety of ways. For example, a leash strap may be attached by stitching to the cover 12. Alternatively, a leash may be tied to the counterweight staff 30 or counterweight.
The preceding discussion is provided for example only. Other variations of the claimed inventive concepts will be obvious to those skilled in the art. For example, the concept of a bladder supported collapsible internal frame may be applied to rounded non-spherical shaped floats. Adaptation or incorporation of known alternative devices and materials, present and future is also contemplated. The intended scope of the invention is defined by the following claims.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
3425390 | Isaac | Feb 1969 | A |
4123813 | Adams | Nov 1978 | A |
4144606 | McIntyre | Mar 1979 | A |
4675686 | Robinson et al. | Jun 1987 | A |
4796553 | Cogswell et al. | Jan 1989 | A |
5141458 | Church | Aug 1992 | A |
5179907 | Galbraith | Jan 1993 | A |
5329873 | Tiballi | Jul 1994 | A |
5516316 | Rumminger | May 1996 | A |
5687664 | Sofian | Nov 1997 | A |
5735719 | Berg | Apr 1998 | A |
6162106 | Shieh | Dec 2000 | A |
6200026 | Carmichael | Mar 2001 | B1 |
6273773 | Bourke | Aug 2001 | B1 |
6652339 | Carmichael | Nov 2003 | B1 |
6860773 | Carmichael | Mar 2005 | B2 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
2039120 | Jul 1980 | GB |