1. Field of the Invention
The invention relates to apparatus and methods for treating pelvic conditions by use of anchored pelvic implants, mesh or sutures to support pelvic tissue. The pelvic conditions include conditions of the female or male anatomy, and specifically include treatments of female or male urinary and fecal incontinence, and treatment of female vaginal prolapse conditions including enterocele, rectocele, cystocele, vault prolapse, and any of these conditions in combination.
2. Background
Pelvic health for men and women is a medical area of increasing importance, at least in part due to an aging population. Examples of common pelvic ailments include incontinence (fecal and urinary) and pelvic tissue prolapse (e.g., female vaginal prolapse). Urinary incontinence can further be classified as including different types, such as stress urinary incontinence (SUI), urge urinary incontinence, mixed urinary incontinence, among others. Other pelvic floor disorders include cystocele, rectocele, enterocele, and prolapse such as anal, uterine and vaginal vault prolapse. A cystocele is a hernia of the bladder, usually into the vagina and introitus. Pelvic disorders such as these can result from weakness or damage to normal pelvic support systems.
In its severest forms, vaginal vault prolapse can result in the distension of the vaginal apex outside of the vagina. An enterocele is a vaginal hernia in which the peritoneal sac containing a portion of the small bowel extends into the rectovaginal space. Vaginal vault prolapse and enterocele represent challenging forms of pelvic disorders for surgeons. These procedures often involve lengthy surgical procedure times.
Urinary incontinence can be characterized by the loss or diminution in the ability to maintain the urethral sphincter closed as the bladder fills with urine. Male or female stress urinary incontinence (SUI) occurs when the patient is physically stressed.
One cause of urinary incontinence is damage to the urethral sphincter. Other causes include the loss of support of the urethral sphincter, such as can occur in males after prostatectomy or following radiation treatment, or that can occur due to pelvic accidents and aging related deterioration of muscle and connective tissue supporting the urethra. Other causes of male incontinence include bladder instability, over-flowing incontinence, and fistulas.
The female's natural support system for the urethra is a hammock-like supportive layer composed of endopelvic fascia, the anterior vaginal wall, and the arcus tendineus. Weakening and elongation of the pubourethral ligaments and the arcus tendineus fascia pelvis, and weakening of the endopelvic fascia and pubourethral prolapse of the anterior vaginal wall, may have a role in the loss of pelvic support for the urethra and a low non-anatomic position that leads to urinary incontinence.
In general, urinary continence is considered to be a function of urethral support and coaptation. For coaptation to successfully prevent or cure incontinence, the urethra must be supported and stabilized in its normal anatomic position. A number of surgical procedures and implantable medical devices have been developed over the years to provide urethral support and restore coaptation. Examples of such surgical instruments included Stamey needles, Raz needles, and Pereyra needles. See Stamey, Endoscopic Suspension of the Vesical Neck for Urinary Incontinence in Females, Ann. Surgery, pp. 465-471, October 1980; and Pereyra, A Simplified Surgical Procedure for the Correction of Stress Incontinence in Women, West. J. Surg., Obstetrics & Gynecology, pp. 243-246, July-August 1959.
One alternative surgical procedure is a pubovaginal sling procedure. A pubovaginal sling procedure is a surgical method involving the placement of a sling to stabilize or support the bladder neck or urethra. There are a variety of different sling procedures. Descriptions of different sling procedures are found in U.S. Pat. Nos. 5,112,344; 5,611,515; 5,842,478; 5,860,425; 5,899,909; 6,039,686; 6,042,534; and 6,110,101.
Some pubovaginal sling procedures extend a sling from the rectus fascia in the abdominal region to a position below the urethra and back again. The slings comprise a central portion that is adapted to support the urethra or a pelvic organ (i.e., a “support portion” or “tissue support portion”), and two extension portions bracketing the support portion, optionally a protective sheath or sheaths encasing at least the extension portions. Although complications associated with sling procedures are infrequent, they do occur. Complications include urethral obstruction, prolonged urinary retention, bladder perforations, damage to surrounding tissue, and sling erosion.
Other treatments involve implantation of a Kaufman Prosthesis, an artificial sphincter (such as the AMS-800 Urinary Control System available from American Medical Systems, Inc.), or a urethral sling procedure in which a urethral sling is inserted beneath the urethra and advanced to the retropubic space. Peripheral or extension portions of the elongated urethral sling are affixed to bone or body tissue at or near the retropubic space. A central support portion of the elongated urethral sling extends under the urethral or bladder neck to provide a platform that compresses the urethral sphincter, limits urethral distention and pelvic drop, and thereby improves coaptation. Similar attached slings or supports have been proposed for restoring proper positioning of pelvic organs, e.g., the vagina or bladder.
Elongated “self-fixating” slings have also been introduced for implantation in the body, to treat pelvic conditions such as prolapse and incontinence conditions. Self-fixating slings do not require the extension portions to be physically attached to tissue or bone. Rather, the slings rely upon tissue ingrowth into sling pores to stabilize the sling. See, for example, commonly assigned U.S. Pat. Nos. 6,382,214, 6,641,524, 6,652,450, and 6,911,003, and publications and patents cited therein. The implantation of these implants involves the use of right and left hand sling implantation tools that create transvaginal, transobturator, supra-pubic, or retro-pubic exposures or pathways. A delivery system for coupling the sling ends to ends of elongate insertion tools, to draw sling extension portions through tissue pathways, is also included. Needles of the right and left hand insertion tools described in the above-referenced 2005/0043580 patent publication have a curvature in a single plane and correspond more generally to the BioArc® SP and SPARC® single use sling implantation tools sold in a kit with an elongated urethral sling by American Medical Systems, Inc.
In some sling implantation kits, the needle portion has a proximal straight portion extending from the handle and a distal curved portion terminating in a needle end or tip. As described in the above-referenced '003 patent, the kit may include more than one type of implantation tool (also, “insertion tool”). The kit may include one tool suitable for an outside-in (e.g. from the skin incision toward a vaginal incision) procedure and another that may be suitable for an inside-out (e.g. from the vaginal incision toward a skin incision) procedure. Surgeons that prefer an approach dictated by the surgeon's dominant hand can select the procedure and the appropriate implantation tool. Alternately, universal implantation tools (e.g., right and left sling implantation tools each suitable for both an inside-out and an outside-in approach) may be provided.
Optionally, a detachable protective sheath may encase some portion of an extension portion of a pelvic implant. Connectors may be attached to the ends of the extension portions for connecting with and end of an insertion tool. Generally speaking, the insertion tool ends are inserted axially into the connectors, and the extension portions of the implant are drawn through pathways trailing the connectors and needles to draw a central support portion against the pelvic tissue (e.g., the urethra) to provide support. The connectors are drawn out through skin incisions and the implant and encasing sheath are severed adjacent to the connectors.
Similar transobturator implantation procedures for implanting a pelvic implant to support a pelvic organ, e.g., the vagina, restored in proper anatomic position, are described in commonly assigned U.S. Patent Application Publication Nos. 2005/0043580 and 2005/0065395. Alternate implantation procedures for creating tissue pathways exiting the skin lateral to the anus and implanting an implant extending between the skin incisions to support a pelvic organ, e.g., the vagina, restored in proper anatomic position, are described in commonly assigned U.S. Patent Application Publication No. 2004/0039453 and in PCT Publication No. WO 03/096929. Various ways of attaching a sleeve end and implant mesh extension to a self-fixating tip are detailed in the above-referenced '450 patent, for example. Further ways of attaching extensions of an implant to an implantation tool are described in U.S. Patent Publication 2004/0087970. In each case extra incisions must be made in the patient's abdomen.
The present patent application describes collapsible tissue anchor devices and methods for inserting into a tissue structure in a first non-collapsed configuration and then collapsing it into a second collapsed configuration. The disclosed tissue anchors may include a sleeve having an interior and a bolt or shank extending through it. The bolt or shank may include a head portion that engages an end of the sleeve. An end of the shank or the head portion itself may be exerted upon to apply a force to the sleeve causing it to move from a first generally tubular non-collapsed configuration to a second collapsed configuration. In the second collapsed configuration the sleeve has flanges that extend radially from the shank or bolt. The flanges act to prevent the anchor from being pulled out of the tissue. A sling, suture, mesh or the like may be coupled to a portion of the anchor to support tissue or an organ in order to treat incontinence, prolapse or any other conditions where a particular tissue or organ has moved from its typical anatomical location, thereby causing undesirable physiological symptoms.
The above summary of the invention is not intended to describe each illustrated embodiment or every implementation of the invention. The figures in the detailed description that follow more particularly exemplify these embodiments.
The invention will be better understood when consideration is given to the following detailed description thereof. Such description makes reference to the annexed drawings wherein:
The preceding description of the drawings is provided for example purposes only and should not be considered limiting. The following detailed description is provided for more detailed examples of the invention. Other embodiments not disclosed or directly discussed are also considered to be within the scope and spirit of the invention. It is not the intention of the inventor to limit the scope of the invention by describing one or more example embodiments.
The invention may be embodied in these and other specific forms without departing from the spirit or attributes thereof, and it is therefore desired that the embodiments be considered in all respects as illustrative and not restrictive, reference being made to the appended claims rather than to the foregoing description to indicate the scope of the invention.
Referring generally to
In the embodiments of
A driver tool 25a can be utilized to deploy the bolt device 20 to and through the body tissue 12. Such a driver or actuator tool 25a can be manually and/or electrically powered and operated. The driver tool 25a may include a sleeve 25b having an open distal end 25c for receiving the bolt head 23. The end of the sleeve 25a may include one or more engagement members 25d that engage washer 26a. The engagement members 25d may comprise posts, shafts or rods that mate with openings or holes in washer 26a. A drive mechanism 25e can be operatively disposed in the sleeve 25a to engage and rotate bolt head 23. In one embodiment, washer 26a can include engagement apertures or features 27 adapted to receive a portion of the driver tool 20 such that the driver tool rotates the bolt 22 while keeping the washer 26a and concomitantly the tube 24 from rotating. By keeping the tube 24 and washer 26a stationary while rotating the bolt 22 a physician is able to collapse the tube 24 without needing any external forces against an outer surface of the tube 24 or without needing tissue engagement members or structures extending away from an outer surface of the tube 24 to engage surrounding tissue. Alternatively, a catheter, or other known delivery device can be used to deploy the bolt device 20 to the target tissue, wherein the actuator can then be used to drive the bolt device 20 through the tissue and into the securing configuration of a tissue anchor.
Various structures and techniques are envisioned for penetrating the tissue for positioning of the bolt device 20 through the tissue. For instance, the leading end of the bolt distal the bolt head 23 can include one or more angled members to aid in penetration through the tissue. In another embodiment of the invention either end or both ends of the bolt device 20 may be generally pointed to aid in delivery of the bolt device 20 to a particular tissue location. Alternatively, a drilling tool can be employed to bore through the tissue prior to insertion of the bolt device 20.
To facilitate anchoring within the tissue, the leading edge of the bolt device 20, including the washer 26b, may be inserted through the tissue for positioning on the second side of the tissue. The driver tool may then engage the bolt head 23 and engagement apertures 27. Actuation of the driver tool drives washer 26a and washer 26b toward each other, which in turn provides an increasing level of compression force on the still tube 24. As the compression forces increases with continued turning of the driver tool, the tube 24 begins to buckle due to the compromised structure created by the slots 28. As such, the tube 24 completely buckles to transform at least a portion of the tube 24 from its initial elongated deployment configuration to a compressed anchoring configuration. In the compressed anchoring configuration, the buckled tube 24 defines a plurality of flanges 30 extending radially from a central axis of the bolt 22 such that the body tissue is positioned intermediate washer 26b and the extended flanges 30, providing an anchor in the tissue. Further adjustments, e.g., loosening or tightening, can be made to the bolt head 23 via the driver tool 25a to stabilize and secure the anchor 20.
The bolt anchor 20 and its respective components can be constructed of known compatible metal or plastic materials. In addition, known support structures or devices, such as mesh, sutures and slings, can be selectively attached to one or more portions of the anchor 20, including the bolt head 23 or washer 26a, to provide a tissue anchor site for the support structures or devices. Any sutures or slings now known or to be developed can be connected to a portion of the bolt anchor 20. Additionally, multiple bolt anchors 20 may be used to suspend a suture or sling to support tissue or an organ.
Alternative embodiments of the bolt anchor 20 are depicted in
In another embodiment, as shown in
In use, the sleeve 42 and shank head 45 are inserted through the tissue 12 to the second side of the tissue 12b such that at least a trailing end 42a of the sleeve 42 is positioned on the first side 12a of the tissue 12. The shank head 45 can be angled to aid in tissue penetration. Alternatively, a drilling or deployment tool can be employed to penetrate the tissue 12 to facilitate insertion of the anchor 20. After insertion of the shank head 45 and sleeve 42 through the tissue 12, the shank 44 and corresponding shank head 45 may be pulled back toward the tissue 12 to exert a compression force on the wall of the sleeve 42. This compression force causes the weakened wall portions 46 to bend or fold, causing the sleeve 42 to fold onto itself at the weakened wall portions 46 to form the anchor flanges 48 (
As illustrated in
The embodiment of
Like the embodiments of
Referring to
As illustrated in
As illustrated in
An engagement or push rod 166 is sized and shaped for insertion through the bore 163 of cap member 156, through the sleeve 152 and into the recess 161 of cap member 154, as shown in
The invention described and depicted herein may be embodied in these and other specific forms without departing from the spirit or attributes thereof, and it is therefore desired that the embodiments be considered in all respects as illustrative and not restrictive, reference being made to the appended claims rather than to the foregoing description to indicate the scope of the invention.
The present non-provisional application claims the benefit of U.S. provisional application No. 61/054,202 filed on May 19, 2008.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
3580313 | McKnight | May 1971 | A |
4548202 | Duncan | Oct 1985 | A |
4632100 | Somers et al. | Dec 1986 | A |
4708553 | Braychak et al. | Nov 1987 | A |
4873976 | Schreiber | Oct 1989 | A |
4938760 | Burton et al. | Jul 1990 | A |
4969892 | Burton et al. | Nov 1990 | A |
4979956 | Silvestrini | Dec 1990 | A |
5013316 | Goble et al. | May 1991 | A |
5019032 | Robertson | May 1991 | A |
5085661 | Moss | Feb 1992 | A |
5141520 | Goble et al. | Aug 1992 | A |
5203864 | Phillips | Apr 1993 | A |
5209756 | Seedhom et al. | May 1993 | A |
5256133 | Spitz | Oct 1993 | A |
5268001 | Nicholson et al. | Dec 1993 | A |
5269783 | Sander | Dec 1993 | A |
5328077 | Lou | Jul 1994 | A |
5354292 | Braeuer et al. | Oct 1994 | A |
5370662 | Stone et al. | Dec 1994 | A |
5376097 | Phillips | Dec 1994 | A |
5383904 | Totakura et al. | Jan 1995 | A |
5480403 | Lee et al. | Jan 1996 | A |
5520700 | Beyar et al. | May 1996 | A |
5527342 | Pietrzak et al. | Jun 1996 | A |
5544664 | Benderev et al. | Aug 1996 | A |
5571139 | Jenkins, Jr. | Nov 1996 | A |
5584860 | Goble et al. | Dec 1996 | A |
5591163 | Thompson | Jan 1997 | A |
5591206 | Moufarrege | Jan 1997 | A |
5643320 | Lower et al. | Jul 1997 | A |
5647836 | Blake et al. | Jul 1997 | A |
5674247 | Sohn | Oct 1997 | A |
5690655 | Hart et al. | Nov 1997 | A |
5697931 | Thompson | Dec 1997 | A |
5709708 | Thal | Jan 1998 | A |
5725529 | Nicholson et al. | Mar 1998 | A |
5725541 | Anspach, III et al. | Mar 1998 | A |
5741282 | Anspach, III et al. | Apr 1998 | A |
5754412 | Clavin | May 1998 | A |
5782862 | Bonuttie | Jul 1998 | A |
5807403 | Beyar et al. | Sep 1998 | A |
5836314 | Benderev et al. | Nov 1998 | A |
5842478 | Benderev et al. | Dec 1998 | A |
5873891 | Sohn | Feb 1999 | A |
5925047 | Errico et al. | Jul 1999 | A |
5948001 | Larsen | Sep 1999 | A |
5954057 | Li | Sep 1999 | A |
5972000 | Beyar et al. | Oct 1999 | A |
5980558 | Wiley | Nov 1999 | A |
5984927 | Wenstrom, Jr. | Nov 1999 | A |
5988171 | Sohn et al. | Nov 1999 | A |
5997554 | Thompson | Dec 1999 | A |
6007539 | Kirsch et al. | Dec 1999 | A |
6019768 | Wenstrom et al. | Feb 2000 | A |
6027523 | Schmieding | Feb 2000 | A |
6036701 | Rosenman | Mar 2000 | A |
6048351 | Gordon et al. | Apr 2000 | A |
6053935 | Brenneman et al. | Apr 2000 | A |
6099552 | Adams | Aug 2000 | A |
6200330 | Benderev et al. | Mar 2001 | B1 |
6241736 | Sater et al. | Jun 2001 | B1 |
6245082 | Gellman et al. | Jun 2001 | B1 |
6264676 | Gellman et al. | Jul 2001 | B1 |
6273852 | Lehe et al. | Aug 2001 | B1 |
6319272 | Brenneman | Nov 2001 | B1 |
6334446 | Beyar | Jan 2002 | B1 |
6334750 | Hsieh | Jan 2002 | B1 |
6334865 | Redmond et al. | Jan 2002 | B1 |
6387041 | Harari et al. | May 2002 | B1 |
6406423 | Scetbon | Jun 2002 | B1 |
6406480 | Beyar et al. | Jun 2002 | B1 |
6423072 | Zappala | Jul 2002 | B1 |
6440154 | gellman et al. | Aug 2002 | B2 |
6451024 | Thompson et al. | Sep 2002 | B1 |
6454778 | Kortenbach | Sep 2002 | B2 |
6506190 | Walshe | Jan 2003 | B1 |
6544273 | Harari et al. | Apr 2003 | B1 |
6582443 | Cabak et al. | Jun 2003 | B2 |
6592610 | Beyar | Jul 2003 | B2 |
6599235 | Kovac | Jul 2003 | B2 |
6635058 | Beyar et al. | Oct 2003 | B2 |
6673010 | Skiba et al. | Jan 2004 | B2 |
6730110 | Harari et al. | May 2004 | B1 |
6746455 | Beyar et al. | Jun 2004 | B2 |
6908473 | Skiba et al. | Jun 2005 | B2 |
6911002 | Fierro | Jun 2005 | B2 |
6974462 | Sater | Dec 2005 | B2 |
6981983 | Rosenblatt et al. | Jan 2006 | B1 |
7144415 | Del Rio et al. | Dec 2006 | B2 |
7297102 | Smith et al. | Nov 2007 | B2 |
7326213 | Benderev et al. | Feb 2008 | B2 |
7601118 | Smith et al. | Oct 2009 | B2 |
7637860 | MacLean | Dec 2009 | B2 |
7686759 | Sater | Mar 2010 | B2 |
7740576 | Hodroff | Jun 2010 | B2 |
7762942 | Neisz et al. | Jul 2010 | B2 |
7789821 | Browning | Sep 2010 | B2 |
7887273 | Vigliotti et al. | Feb 2011 | B2 |
20010027321 | Gellman et al. | Oct 2001 | A1 |
20010041895 | Beyer et al. | Nov 2001 | A1 |
20020035369 | Beyar et al. | Mar 2002 | A1 |
20020050277 | Beyar | May 2002 | A1 |
20020055748 | Gellman et al. | May 2002 | A1 |
20020082619 | Cabak et al. | Jun 2002 | A1 |
20020095064 | Beyar | Jul 2002 | A1 |
20020095163 | Beyar | Jul 2002 | A1 |
20020095181 | Beyar | Jul 2002 | A1 |
20020128681 | Broome et al. | Sep 2002 | A1 |
20020147382 | Neisz et al. | Oct 2002 | A1 |
20020161382 | Neisz | Oct 2002 | A1 |
20040193215 | Harari et al. | Sep 2004 | A1 |
20040236373 | Anspach, III | Nov 2004 | A1 |
20050004576 | Benderev | Jan 2005 | A1 |
20050049634 | Chopra | Mar 2005 | A1 |
20050199249 | Karram | Sep 2005 | A1 |
20050256530 | Petros | Nov 2005 | A1 |
20050277806 | Cristalli | Dec 2005 | A1 |
20050283189 | Rosenblatt et al. | Dec 2005 | A1 |
20060089525 | Mamo et al. | Apr 2006 | A1 |
20060229493 | Weiser et al. | Oct 2006 | A1 |
20060229596 | Weiser et al. | Oct 2006 | A1 |
20060252980 | Arnal et al. | Nov 2006 | A1 |
20060260618 | Hodroff et al. | Nov 2006 | A1 |
20060282084 | Blier et al. | Dec 2006 | A1 |
20070015953 | MacLean | Jan 2007 | A1 |
20070078295 | Iandgrebe | Apr 2007 | A1 |
20070173864 | Chu | Jul 2007 | A1 |
20090012353 | Beyer | Jan 2009 | A1 |
20090221868 | Evans | Sep 2009 | A1 |
20100010631 | Otte et al. | Jan 2010 | A1 |
20100094079 | Inman | Apr 2010 | A1 |
20100168505 | Inman et al. | Jul 2010 | A1 |
20100174134 | Anderson et al. | Jul 2010 | A1 |
20100261952 | Montpetit et al. | Oct 2010 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
0643945 | Jul 1994 | EP |
0632999 | Jan 1995 | EP |
WO9310715 | Jun 1993 | WO |
WO9319678 | Oct 1993 | WO |
WO9511631 | May 1995 | WO |
WO9525469 | Sep 1995 | WO |
WO9730638 | Aug 1997 | WO |
WO9747244 | Dec 1997 | WO |
WO9819606 | May 1998 | WO |
WO9835606 | Aug 1998 | WO |
WO9835616 | Aug 1998 | WO |
WO9842261 | Oct 1998 | WO |
WO9937216 | Jul 1999 | WO |
WO9937217 | Jul 1999 | WO |
WO9952450 | Oct 1999 | WO |
WO9953844 | Oct 1999 | WO |
WO9958074 | Nov 1999 | WO |
WO9959477 | Nov 1999 | WO |
WO9853746 | Dec 1999 | WO |
WO0013601 | Mar 2000 | WO |
WO0030556 | Jun 2000 | WO |
WO0040158 | Jul 2000 | WO |
WO0057796 | Oct 2000 | WO |
WO0230293 | Apr 2002 | WO |
WO02069781 | Sep 2002 | WO |
WO03034891 | May 2003 | WO |
WO03034939 | May 2003 | WO |
WO2006015031 | Feb 2006 | WO |
WO2007002071 | Jan 2007 | WO |
WO2007059199 | May 2007 | WO |
WO2007097994 | Aug 2007 | WO |
WO2007137226 | Nov 2007 | WO |
WO2007149348 | Dec 2007 | WO |
WO2008057261 | May 2008 | WO |
WO2009005714 | Jan 2009 | WO |
WO2009017680 | Feb 2009 | WO |
Entry |
---|
Capio™ CL—Transvaginal Suture Capturing Device—Transvaginal Suture Fixation to Cooper's Ligament for Sling Procedures, Boston Scientific, Microvasive®, 8 pages, (2002). |
Mitek Brochure, Therapy of Urinary Stess Incontinence in Women Using Mitek GIII Anchors, by Valenzio C. Mascio, MD. (1993). |
Pelosi, Marco Antonio III et al., Pubic Bone Suburethral Stabilization Sling: Laparoscopic Assessment of a Transvaginal Operation for the Treatment of Stress Urinary Incontinence, Journal of Laparoendoscopic & Advaned Surgical Techniques, vol. 9, No. 1 pp. 45-50 (1999). |
Sanz, Luis E. et al., Modification of Abdominal Sacrocolpopexy Using a Suture Anchor System, The Journal of Reproductive Medicine, vol. 48, n. 7, pp. 496-500 (Jul. 2003). |
Vesica® Percutaneous Bladder Neck Stabilization Kit, A New Approach to Bladder Neck Suspenison, Microvasive® Boston Scientific Corporation, 4 pages (1995). |
Precision Twist, Low Profile design for Precise Anchor Placement, Boston Scientific Microvasive, 2001 2 pp. |
Vesica Sling Kit, Microvasive Boston Scientific, 1997, 6pp. |
Precision Tack, The Precise Approach to Transvaginal Sling Procedures, Boston Scientific, 1998, 4pp. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20090287229 A1 | Nov 2009 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
61054202 | May 2008 | US |