The subject invention relates to performing catheter-based diagnostic or therapeutic procedures within the lung. In particular, the invention relates to closing or partially closing intercommunicating channels within the lung in order to prevent a target lung compartment from receiving collateral ventilation through such intercommunicating secondary channels.
The lung consists of a left lung and right lung having two and three lobes respectively (
In some disease states, such interconnections at the lung lobule level and/or connections through incomplete fissures can become more pronounced, rendering certain treatments problematic. For example, emphysema may be treated by minimally invasive lung volume reduction (LVR) where feeding airways that deliver air to diseased hyperinflated lung lobes or segments within a lobe are plugged or otherwise occluded to prevent re-inflation. However, if collateral interconnections exist, LVR can be hampered since the collapsed region can re-inflate through any collateral connection.
Proposed treatments to circumvent this problem include permanently shrinking the targeted region, lobe or lobe segment, such as by ablating, heating, mechanically compressing with an implant, or the like. In such treatments, collateral leakage is immaterial since reinflation of the treated area is physically prevented by nature of the treatment. These treatments, however, are destructive and have not yet achieved good, safe results and are considered undesirable.
Therefore, in the case of minimally invasive lung volume reduction for emphysema treatment it would be desirable to partially or completely block or close collateral passages and pathways which allow collateral ventilation with adjacent regions.
One such method is described in published US Patent Application 2003/0228344 which proposes injecting an agent bronchscopically, transthoracically or by puncturing a bronchial wall, to close the collateral channels while using a one-way valve in an airway to control the air flow path so that the deposition of the agent is directed into the collateral channels. Unfortunately, this technique has a significant disadvantage in that the targeting of the agent is poorly controlled with the methods they describe. Pressure differentials, created by use of a bronchial one-way valve or applying vacuum transthoracically to a lung area, allow the agent to mix and spread to unwanted areas. An additional disadvantage of this technique is that the user must perform lung volume reduction on the patient by implanting bronchial valves or occluders in order to diagnose whether or not the patient possess collateral channels. If the patient does not develop lung area deflation by gas absorption, or absorption atelectasis, then it is concluded there are collateral channels and the patient requires the collateral channel treatment. This is a very inconvenient treatment protocol.
As will be described in the subsequent sections, the present invention solves at least some of the deficiencies of such prior art techniques.
The present invention provides methods and devices for partially or completely closing collateral pathways in lungs, including between and within individual lobes. In particular, the methods comprise isolating a target lung region (TLR) with an isolation catheter, applying vacuum to the target area via the catheter to establish a convective flow current from a neighboring lung compartment (NLC) through the collateral pathway (if any) into the isolated target area and the catheter and out the body. If collateral flow exists, an agent is delivered into the neighboring lung compartment, typically using a catheter or other delivery device introduced through the bronchial tree and into the neighboring lung compartment. The agent is entrained into the convective flow current through the collateral pathway(s) established by the vacuum. The entrained substance enters and lodges in the collateral pathway(s), while excess agent remains entrained with the convective flow current through the collateral pathway and is typically conducted out of the body through the aspiration catheter.
Referring now to
Each lung segment, also referred to as a bronchopulmonary segment, is an anatomically distinct unit or compartment of the lung which is fed air by a tertiary bronchus and which oxygenates blood through a tertiary artery. Normally, the lung segment and its surrounding fibrous septum are intact units which can be surgically removed or separated from the remainder of the lung without interrupting the function of the surrounding lung segments.
The presence of collateral flow channels in the fibrous septum or wall of a diseased lung segment is problematic since the diseased segment cannot be removed or even isolated successfully with the collateral channels intact. In the case of isolation and deflation of the diseased lung segment, the presence of the collateral channels will permit the reentry of air as the patient breathes. Thus, the present invention, by occluding the collateral passages, returns a perforate or porous lung wall into a functionally intact lung wall which permits subsequent treatment of diseased regions using endobronchial or other treatment protocols.
According to one embodiment of the present invention, the patient is usually diagnosed for the presence or absence of collateral ventilation (CV), typically using a minimally invasive catheter-based spirometry test described in co-pending application Ser. No. 11/296,951, the full disclosure of which is incorporated herein by reference. The test requires only a simple benign catheterization procedure. Usually, the patient is further diagnosed, using a minimally invasive catheter-based procedure to determine which area of the lung is most diseased and in most need of treatment, e.g., as described in U.S. patent Ser. No. 10/241,733, the full disclosure of which is incorporated herein by reference. Performing these diagnostic tests pre-operatively will help assure that the collateral channel treatment is performed in a lung area that is free from problematic collateral pathways and which can benefit from the treatment.
Collateral channels may have beneficial effects in emphysematic patients such as limitation of hyperinflation, minimization of bullae formation, and reduce flow limitation during exhalation. Therefore, when closing the collateral channels, the risk has to be offset by the benefit. In the present invention, since the lung area is preferably first diagnosed as an area that can benefit by being collapsed by the lung volume reduction procedure, the benefit of closing the collateral channels is more likely to offset the risk of closing these channels.
Referring to
Referring to
From this point forward, the flow being aspirated is entering the isolated target lung region (TLR) from the collateral pathways, for example in the fibrous septum FS. These pathways will allow air inflow from the neighboring lung compartment (NLC). Thus, a convective flow of air is created from the neighboring lung compartment (NLC), through the collateral pathways in the fibrous septum FS, into the target lung region (TLR). This flow has the characteristics of a flow stream or current which can carry a sealing agent into the pathways in the separating septum, as will be described in detail below.
The vacuum level may be dynamic and synchronized with the breath cycle in order to maintain a desired vacuum level during all phases of the patient's breath cycle. Generally the vacuum level is between −5 cmH2O and −20 cmH2O. The vacuum can also be intermittent, although continuous is preferred in order to maintain a constant flow current through the collateral pathways. Control of the vacuum can be manual or automatic based on feedback from lung using sensors built into the catheter or other sensors monitoring the patient's respiration. The vacuum instrument typically is comprised of a vacuum pump or vacuum source and will usually include, a vacuum regulator with closed loop feedback so that the vacuum output from the instrument is unchanged when conditions at the other end of the catheter change, and the requisite sensors, electronics, power supply and user interface. The vacuum instrument also comprises a particulate trap to intercept and collect any of the agent being administered into the lung, described later.
The applied vacuum fundamentally changes the airflow ventilation dynamics in the affected lung areas. Normally, in the lower airways and lung lobule structures, with or without emphysema, ventilation consists of very small amplitude bidirectional movements of small volumes of air and indeed much of the gas movement can be characterized more accurately by diffusion and not convection. However, once vacuum aspiration is applied, the flow current established by aspiration dominates the flow dynamics in the affected areas and creates a unidirectional convective flow environment. The convective flow is characterized by a static unidirectional flow current and the pre-existing gas diffusion or small bidirectional movements of volume are completely nullified by the convective flow.
Referring to
When the user has confirmed that the aspiration flow current has been properly established by analysis of the aspiration parameters such as pressure and flow, the agent delivery instrument 22 is actuated to release and propel the agent. The agent is ejected from a distal tip 24 of the agent delivery catheter 22 into the neighboring lung compartment (NLC) and is readily entrained into convective flow established by the aspiration catheter 10. The delivery of agent will be controlled in order to maximize the chance that the agent will be entrained. For example, the agent may only be delivered during the inspiratory phase of the patient's breath cycle so that the agent is not spread inadvertently to other lung areas during the counter flow which would occur during exhalation. Propulsion of the agent may be designed such that a burst or high velocity mist is ejected from the agent delivery catheter tip at the designated time in order to increase the time-of-flight to help the agent travel distally to regions of greater aspiration current.
Eventually, the agent is drawn into the collateral pathways e.g., in the fibrous septum FS, by the convective current. Initially much of the agent travels through the collateral pathways into the target lung region (TLR) and is collected by the aspiration catheter 10 and evacuated to a particulate trap or other filter at the aspiration instrument. Only some of the agent is initially deposited on the surfaces of the collateral pathways as the agent is flowing with the aspiration current. But as agent becomes deposited, the collateral pathway aperture size is reduced thus increasing the rate of deposition of agent in the pathways and reducing the rate of agent passing through the pathways from the neighboring lung compartment (NLC) into the target lung region (TLR). Eventually no more agent can travel through the pathways as the pathways become occluded due to agent deposition. Analysis of the aspiration parameters will show a change in resistance to aspiration flow indicating that the upstream conditions have changed, namely the resistance of the collateral pathways. Aspiration and or agent delivery parameters such as amplitude, frequency and composition, can be stopped when the desired resistance is met, or can be modulated to arrive at the desired resistance.
The agent that is delivered to increase the resistance of the collateral pathways can be an aerosolized, nebulized or an atomized agent. To increase time-of-flight the agent can be aerosolized, nebulized or atomized at the distal tip of the agent delivery catheter. The agent can be bioresorptive or biodegradeable, non-resorptive or non-biodegradeable, can be inflammatory or non-inflammatory, can be inert or can cause tissue reaction such as fibroblast encapsulation, ossification or calcification.
Suitable agents can be a solid, such as but not limited to a powder, such as silicone or silica, polyethylene glycol (PEG), bone, calcium hydroxylapatite, polyvinylalcohol (PVA), or the like. Alternatively, the agent can be a fluid or liquid such as but not limited to glucose, glycerin, hyaluronic acid, polylactic acid, liquid silicone, perfluorocarbon, or the like. Additional examples of the clogging agent include sucrose or other sugar-type compounds or isomers; celluloic materials, like sodium carboxymethylcellulose; colloids; and crystalloids. In the case of a liquid it is important that the liquid be adequately aerosolized, nebulized or atomized before it is ejected into the lung airways. The agent can be a single component agent, for example talc powder, or can be a composite, for example glucose and talc powder. In the later example glucose can be nebulized or aerosolized to act as a carrier agent carrying the talc powder in a suspension matrix to the site of deposition. Further, when the composite glucose-talc suspension matrix deposits in the collateral pathways and restricts or clogs them, over time the glucose is resorbed into the tissues while the talc stays deposited in the pathways. Similarly the carrier agent can be phagocytized, sloughed off, dissolved or otherwise removed from the lung. Another example of a composite mixture with a carrier agent is calcium hydroxylapatite suspended in a carrier cloud of nebulized sodium carboxymethylcellulose and saline. The agent can also be a substance, again such as glucose, but which has another ingredient chemically bonded to the glucose, thus using glucose as a carrier molecule to deliver the other ingredient to the site of deposition. At the site, the ingredient dissociates from the glucose molecule at over time. For example the chemical bonds may be relatively weak bonds that simply break over time, or as the glucose is chemically altered as a natural part of resorption into the tissue, the bond is broken releasing the ingredient which then stays behind in the collateral pathway. Or the chemical bond may be designed to break when the molecule reacts with the physiological conditions in the lung, such as temperature, hydroxyl groups, carbon dioxide, etc. Or the chemical bond may remain intact until a secondary agent is introduced to react with the molecule and break the bond releasing the ingredient. The secondary agent can be a certain gas introduced at a later time, or an energy source applied to the area as described below.
In a second embodiment, a method and devices are disclosed in which the agent that is delivered is designed to have a state change or undergo chemical alteration after being deposited in the collateral pathway. The state change allows the agent to be delivered in a highly particalized small state in order to maximize time-of-flight and penetration into the collateral pathways. Once deposited, the agent can change to a less particalized state with sufficient persistence to stay at the site of deposition. For example, typical sizes of the particles in the particulate state can have molecular weights of 100-500 Daltons versus molecular weights of 100-1,000 KDa in an agglomerated or coalesced state. The larger size would immobilize the agent onto the host tissue to resistant migration. The particles in the delivered state may also be hydrophobic or lubricious or very light in viscosity and generally highly un-reactive with like particles in order to maximize penetration into the collateral pathways.
Once at the site of deposition, a state change can convert the agent into a more persistent form having improved clogging behavior. For example, the agent after its state change can react or coalesce with like particles to form large matrices of material, or can become sticky or can become hydrophilic or thicken to a high viscosity. The transformed agent will have improved persistence, for example due to its bulk or due to chemical interaction with the host tissues such as chemical bond forces. Alternatively, the agent could comprise hydroxyl group or other chemical groups which bond to the host tissue surface. In some instances, the agent can be polymerized or otherwise solidified by exposure to activating radiation from a source 30 (
Particalization of the agent immediately prior to delivery is accomplished by aerosolizing, nebulizing or atomizing as described earlier. A persistent or coalesced structure may be created after the agent has been deposited in the collateral pathway and could occur automatically for example with a time-delayed reaction designed into the chemical structure. Or, the agent could be designed to react under the physiological conditions existing in the pathway, as described earlier. Alternatively, coalescence could be induced manually, for example, by applying an energy source to the agent. The energy source can be applied endobronchially (such as using a catheter) or from the outside of the patient's body (e.g., using an MRI machine). The energy source can be for example photodynamic energy, light energy, ultrasonic, radiofrequency, electromagnetic, magnetic or any energy source. The energy is preferentially targeted to the area of agent deposition in the collateral pathways and not to surrounding areas that are not part of the pathways. For example, a targeted ultrasonic or other energy beam can be focused on the area much like lithotripsy.
The blocking treatment can be terminated when the flow resistance of the collateral passages has been increased as desired by the user. The agent delivery and the aspiration flow will be terminated, and the agent delivery catheter 20 is removed from the neighboring lung compartment (NLC). Then as illustrated in
In a further aspect of the present invention, an antidote substance may be delivered to the targeted lung region (TLR) and/or neighboring lung compartment (NLC) in order to dissolve, remove, neutralize or cause resorption of any stray agent that has deposited in undesirable areas. The antidote is delivered via inhalation, aerosolization, nebulization, atomization, or catheter based delivery or lavage.
The present invention thus provides systems and methods for delivery of the agent is that is highly controlled despite the inspiratory and expiratory volume excursions and gas diffusion in the region of interest. In the present invention, unique and novel techniques are employed to control and target the agent delivery; (1) a lung area is definitively diagnosed as requiring treatment for emphysema, (2) that lung area is definitively diagnosed as possessing collateral pathways, (3) an airway is minimally invasively isolated with an isolation catheter, (4) vacuum is applied to a lung region, (5) convective flow is established across a collateral channel, (6) normally present inspiratory and expiratory movements of gas and gas diffusion is canceled out by the convective flow current, (7) agent is introduced into the convective current, (8) the convective current carries the agent to the desired location with negligible losses in other areas, (9) optionally, the agent is activated by chemical reactions or by application of energy from a source to coalesce into a clotting or clogging agent.
It can be appreciated that there are many combinations of the above embodiments that can be combined in different ways for a host of applications. For example, the delivery of the agent can be performed opposite as that described in which aspiration is applied to the neighboring lung compartment (NLC) in which case the agent is delivered into the targeted region. This orientation may be preferred in case some of the agent is inadvertently deposited in unwanted areas; if these areas are in the lung area intended to be collapsed then side effects of the agent can be neglected.
Some additional option configurations of the invention include the catheter configurations, for example, the catheters may or may not include isolation. In various embodiments, the aspiration and agent delivery catheter can be a single multiple lumen catheter, a bifurcated catheter, or two separate catheters. In various embodiments, agent delivery can occur by the patient spontaneously inspiring from a reservoir of agent.
In various embodiments, different or multiple regions of the organ can be treated, simultaneously or sequentially, or regions can have repeat treatments. In various embodiments, the treatment can be acute, lasting only seconds or minutes, or can take a longer period of time, for example days or weeks, in which case there may be required multiple interrupted treatments before the full effect is realized. Certainly, a variety of aspiration vacuum and or agent delivery parameters can be applied, such as different frequencies and amplitudes and concentrations. Emitted dose of agent can be modulated as needed using feedback of the appropriate measured parameter. Agent delivery can be done concurrently with activation or separately.
Navigation and positioning of the catheters can be bronchoscopically or fluoroscopically and catheters can be inserted through the working channel of the bronchoscope or over guide wires or combinations thereof. Placement of the catheters can be bronchoscopically guided and then secured in place with the appropriate means at the distal or proximal end. The bronchoscope can be used during the aspiration and agent delivery or can be removed leaving the aspiration and agent delivery catheters securely positioned in place.
Also, the treatment can be performed using positive pressure by insufflating a target lung region (TLR) with the agent and optionally aspirating it from the neighboring lung compartment (NLC), or visa versa. Or, the agent can be simply instilled into the target area then aspirated back out, either simultaneously or sequentially. Or a differential positive pressure can be created in the system to create the flow current.
In addition, while the above description is directed primarily to a collateral pathway pre-treatment approach as a prerequisite to minimally invasive lung volume reduction for treating emphysema, the collateral pathway treatment may also be applied to other therapeutic or diagnostic procedures, such as tuberculosis treatment, ventilation therapy for ARDS, SARS treatment, CF treatment, cancer treatment, fistula treatment or the like. Additionally, the invention can be applied to other body organ systems with collateral pathways, such as the vascular system, and can be applied to gas filled systems or liquid filled systems. Furthermore, in various embodiments, the collateral pathway treatment can be performed as an outpatient procedure while the patient is spontaneously breathing and properly sedated, or during general anesthesia.
In another embodiment, and with reference now to
The targeted lung region can be suctioned prior to injection of a therapeutic agent into the targeted lung region in order to remove fluid and either reduce the volume or collapse the targeted lung region. This reduction in volume or collapse of the targeted lung region serves to create space in the targeted lung region for injection of the therapeutic agent. As discussed below, suction can also be used after injection of the therapeutic agent, such as to suction the therapeutic agent from the targeted lung region. If a bronchial isolation device is implanted in the lung, the suction can be performed before the device is implanted or while the device is implanted, such as suctioning through the device. In this regard, the suction can be applied either distally or proximally of the implanted bronchial isolation device.
The suction can be applied either continuously or in a pulsatile manner, such as by using either a continuous or pulsatile vacuum source. In one embodiment, fluid can be aspirated from the targeted lung region using a very low vacuum source over a long period of time, such as one hour or more. In this case, the catheter may be inserted nasally and a water seal may control the vacuum source.
In one embodiment, pulsatile suction is defined as a vacuum source that varies in vacuum pressure from atmospheric pressure down to −10 cm H2O. The frequency of the pulse can be adjusted so that the collapsed bronchus has time to re-open at the trough of the suction wave prior to the next cycle. The frequency of the pulse can be fast enough such that the bronchus does not have time to collapse at the peak of the suction wave prior to the next cycle. The suction force can be regulated such that even at the peak suction, the negative pressure is not low enough to collapse the distal airways.
The frequency of the suction (either pulsatile or continuous) could be set to the patient's respiratory cycle such that negative pressure is applied only during inspiration. That is, the suction is synchronized with the patient's respiration such that continuous suction or a series of suction pulses are applied to the targeted lung region only while the patient is inhaling. This can allow the lung's tethering forces to be exerted thereby keeping the distal airways open.
One possible method of implementing pulsatile suction is to utilize a water manometer attached to a vacuum source. The vacuum regulator pipe in the water manometer can be manually or mechanically moved up and down at the desired frequency to the desired vacuum break point (0 to −10 cm). This is only an exemplary method of creating a pulsatile vacuum source and it should be appreciated that other methods can be used.
A therapeutic agent comprised of a bulking agent can be used to fill space (such as space within the targeted lung region and/or a collateral pathway to the targeted lung region) and thereby partially or entirely seal off collateral flow into the targeted lung region.
Various substances can be used as bulking agents and carriers. Some exemplary substances that can be used as bulking agents and carriers include hydrogel and autologous blood among others. A hydrogel is defined as a colloidal gel in which water is the dispersion medium, and a colloid is defined as a mixture with properties between those of a solution and fine suspension. Hydrogels can be used as implantable bulking agents as well as a carrier for other therapeutic agents as the hydrogel can be designed to be absorbed slowly by the body, thus releasing the therapeutic agent into surrounding tissue over time.
Another approach for blocking collateral flow into a targeted lung region is to inject a bulking agent (such as hydrogel) into the target lung region prior to isolating the targeted lung region with bronchial isolation devices. One method for implanting the bulking agent into the target region is to use a catheter.
Once the delivery catheter 710 is deployed in the targeted lung region, the bulking agent 705 can be delivered into the targeted lung region using the delivery catheter 710. This can be accomplished by passing the bulking agent through an internal lumen in the delivery catheter so that the agent exits a hole in the distal end of the delivery catheter 710 into the targeted lung region. As shown in
In order to track the dispersion of the bulking agent, or any other injected therapeutic agent, a small quantity of radiographic contrast can be mixed with the bulking agent prior to injecting the bulking agent. The extent and spread of the injection can then be monitored with fluoroscopy.
Prior to or after the bulking agent is injected, at least one bronchial isolation device can optionally implanted in the bronchial lumen(s) leading to the targeted lung region in order to restrict direct flow to the targeted tissue through the bronchial lumen, as described above. In this manner, the tissue is fully isolated. However, it should be appreciated that the bronchial isolation device is not required to be implanted in combination with use of the bulking agent. It should be appreciated that other methods of delivering the bulking agent to the target location are possible.
A number of embodiments of the invention have been described. Nevertheless, various modifications may be made without departing from the spirit and scope of the invention. Accordingly, other embodiments are within the scope of the following claims.
The present application is a continuation-in-part and claims the benefit of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 11/067,025, entitled Methods and Devices for Blocking Flow Through Collateral Pathways in the Lung, filed Feb. 25, 2005, which claims the benefit of Provisional U.S. Application No. 60/548,791, filed Feb. 27, 2004. The present application is also a continuation-in-part and claims the benefit of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 11/620,016, entitled Collateral Pathway Treatment Using Agent Entrained by Aspiration Flow Current, which claims the benefit of Provisional U.S. Application No. 60/756,732, filed Jan. 6, 2006. The full disclosures of all of the references mentioned above are hereby incorporated herein by reference.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
2981254 | Vanderbilt | Apr 1961 | A |
3322126 | Rusch et al. | May 1967 | A |
3498286 | Polanyi et al. | Mar 1970 | A |
3657744 | Ersek | Apr 1972 | A |
3669098 | Takahashi | Jun 1972 | A |
3677262 | Zukowski | Jul 1972 | A |
3776222 | Smiddy | Dec 1973 | A |
3788327 | Donowitz et al. | Jan 1974 | A |
3866599 | Johnson | Feb 1975 | A |
3874388 | King et al. | Apr 1975 | A |
3913568 | Carpenter | Oct 1975 | A |
4014318 | Dockum et al. | Mar 1977 | A |
4031885 | Davis et al. | Jun 1977 | A |
4041936 | Carden | Aug 1977 | A |
4086665 | Poirier | May 1978 | A |
4212463 | Repinski et al. | Jul 1980 | A |
4250873 | Bonnet | Feb 1981 | A |
4302854 | Runge | Dec 1981 | A |
4327720 | Bronson et al. | May 1982 | A |
4327721 | Goldin et al. | May 1982 | A |
4413632 | Schlessinger et al. | Nov 1983 | A |
4453545 | Inoue | Jun 1984 | A |
4468216 | Muto | Aug 1984 | A |
4477930 | Totten et al. | Oct 1984 | A |
4567882 | Heller | Feb 1986 | A |
4710192 | Liotta et al. | Dec 1987 | A |
4716896 | Ackerman | Jan 1988 | A |
4732152 | Wallsten et al. | Mar 1988 | A |
4742819 | George | May 1988 | A |
4759758 | Gabbay | Jul 1988 | A |
4784133 | Mackin | Nov 1988 | A |
4795449 | Schneider et al. | Jan 1989 | A |
4796639 | Snow et al. | Jan 1989 | A |
4808183 | Panje | Feb 1989 | A |
4819664 | Nazari | Apr 1989 | A |
4830003 | Wolff et al. | May 1989 | A |
4832680 | Haber et al. | May 1989 | A |
4846153 | Berci | Jul 1989 | A |
4846836 | Reich | Jul 1989 | A |
4850371 | Broadhurst et al. | Jul 1989 | A |
4850999 | Planck | Jul 1989 | A |
4852568 | Kensey | Aug 1989 | A |
4862874 | Kellner | Sep 1989 | A |
4877025 | Hanson | Oct 1989 | A |
4896941 | Hayashi et al. | Jan 1990 | A |
4934999 | Bader | Jun 1990 | A |
4949716 | Chenoweth | Aug 1990 | A |
4955375 | Martinez | Sep 1990 | A |
4958932 | Kegelman et al. | Sep 1990 | A |
4961738 | Mackin | Oct 1990 | A |
4968294 | Salama | Nov 1990 | A |
4972842 | Korten et al. | Nov 1990 | A |
4976710 | Mackin | Dec 1990 | A |
5056529 | de Groot | Oct 1991 | A |
5061274 | Kensey | Oct 1991 | A |
5116360 | Pinchuk et al. | May 1992 | A |
5116564 | Jansen et al. | May 1992 | A |
5123919 | Sauter et al. | Jun 1992 | A |
5143062 | Peckham | Sep 1992 | A |
5146916 | Catalani | Sep 1992 | A |
5151105 | Kwan-Gett | Sep 1992 | A |
5161524 | Evans | Nov 1992 | A |
5246012 | Strickland | Sep 1993 | A |
5285778 | Mackin | Feb 1994 | A |
5306234 | Johnson | Apr 1994 | A |
5309903 | Long | May 1994 | A |
5331947 | Shturman | Jul 1994 | A |
5352240 | Ross | Oct 1994 | A |
5358518 | Camilli | Oct 1994 | A |
5361753 | Pothmann et al. | Nov 1994 | A |
5392775 | Adkins et al. | Feb 1995 | A |
5409019 | Wilk | Apr 1995 | A |
5411507 | Heckele | May 1995 | A |
5411552 | Andersen et al. | May 1995 | A |
5413599 | Imachi et al. | May 1995 | A |
5417226 | Juma | May 1995 | A |
5445626 | Gigante | Aug 1995 | A |
5447165 | Gustafss | Sep 1995 | A |
5477851 | Callaghan et al. | Dec 1995 | A |
5486154 | Kelleher | Jan 1996 | A |
5499625 | Frass et al. | Mar 1996 | A |
5499995 | Teirstein | Mar 1996 | A |
5500014 | Quijano et al. | Mar 1996 | A |
5562608 | Sekins et al. | Oct 1996 | A |
5598840 | Iund et al. | Feb 1997 | A |
5642730 | Baran | Jul 1997 | A |
5645519 | Lee et al. | Jul 1997 | A |
5645565 | Rudd et al. | Jul 1997 | A |
5653231 | Bell | Aug 1997 | A |
5660175 | Dayal | Aug 1997 | A |
5662713 | Andersen et al. | Sep 1997 | A |
5682880 | Brain | Nov 1997 | A |
5683451 | Lenker et al. | Nov 1997 | A |
5697968 | Rogers et al. | Dec 1997 | A |
5707352 | Sekins et al. | Jan 1998 | A |
5752921 | Orr | May 1998 | A |
5755770 | Ravenscroft | May 1998 | A |
5757593 | Stoger | May 1998 | A |
5800339 | Salama | Sep 1998 | A |
5840081 | Andersen et al. | Nov 1998 | A |
5851232 | Lois | Dec 1998 | A |
5855587 | Hyon et al. | Jan 1999 | A |
5855597 | Jayaraman | Jan 1999 | A |
5855601 | Bessler et al. | Jan 1999 | A |
5893867 | Bagaoisan et al. | Apr 1999 | A |
5944738 | Amplatz et al. | Aug 1999 | A |
5947997 | Pavcnik et al. | Sep 1999 | A |
5954050 | Christopher | Sep 1999 | A |
5954766 | Zadno-Azizi et al. | Sep 1999 | A |
5957919 | Laufer | Sep 1999 | A |
5957949 | Leonhardt et al. | Sep 1999 | A |
5972026 | Laufer et al. | Oct 1999 | A |
5976174 | Ruiz | Nov 1999 | A |
5984965 | Knapp et al. | Nov 1999 | A |
6007575 | Samuels | Dec 1999 | A |
6009614 | Morales | Jan 2000 | A |
6016839 | Raftis et al. | Jan 2000 | A |
6020380 | Killian | Feb 2000 | A |
6022312 | Chaussy et al. | Feb 2000 | A |
6027525 | Suh et al. | Feb 2000 | A |
6050972 | Zadno-Azizi et al. | Apr 2000 | A |
6051022 | Cai et al. | Apr 2000 | A |
6068602 | Tham et al. | May 2000 | A |
6068635 | Gianotti | May 2000 | A |
6068638 | Makower | May 2000 | A |
6071237 | Weil et al. | Jun 2000 | A |
6077291 | Das | Jun 2000 | A |
6083255 | Laufer et al. | Jul 2000 | A |
6123663 | Rebuffat | Sep 2000 | A |
6135729 | Aber | Oct 2000 | A |
6135991 | Muni et al. | Oct 2000 | A |
6141855 | Morales | Nov 2000 | A |
6162245 | Jayaraman | Dec 2000 | A |
6168614 | Andersen et al. | Jan 2001 | B1 |
6174323 | Biggs et al. | Jan 2001 | B1 |
6174331 | Moe et al. | Jan 2001 | B1 |
6183520 | Pintauro et al. | Feb 2001 | B1 |
6200333 | Laufer | Mar 2001 | B1 |
6206918 | Campbell et al. | Mar 2001 | B1 |
6234996 | Bagaoisan et al. | May 2001 | B1 |
6240615 | Kimes et al. | Jun 2001 | B1 |
6245102 | Jayaraman | Jun 2001 | B1 |
6258100 | Alferness et al. | Jul 2001 | B1 |
6270527 | Campbell et al. | Aug 2001 | B1 |
6283988 | Laufer et al. | Sep 2001 | B1 |
6287290 | Perkins et al. | Sep 2001 | B1 |
6293951 | Alferness et al. | Sep 2001 | B1 |
6302893 | Limon et al. | Oct 2001 | B1 |
6312407 | Zadno-Azizi et al. | Nov 2001 | B1 |
6325777 | Zadno-Azizi et al. | Dec 2001 | B1 |
6325778 | Zadno-Azizi et al. | Dec 2001 | B1 |
6327772 | Zadno-Azizi et al. | Dec 2001 | B1 |
6328689 | Gonzalez | Dec 2001 | B1 |
6355014 | Zadno-Azizi et al. | Mar 2002 | B1 |
6398775 | Perkins et al. | Jun 2002 | B1 |
6402754 | Gonzalez | Jun 2002 | B1 |
6416554 | Alferness et al. | Jul 2002 | B1 |
6450976 | Korotko et al. | Sep 2002 | B2 |
6458076 | Pruitt | Oct 2002 | B1 |
6458153 | Bailey et al. | Oct 2002 | B1 |
6485407 | Alferness et al. | Nov 2002 | B2 |
6488673 | Laufer et al. | Dec 2002 | B1 |
6491706 | Alferness et al. | Dec 2002 | B1 |
6493589 | Medhkour et al. | Dec 2002 | B1 |
6510846 | O'Rourke | Jan 2003 | B1 |
6527761 | Soltesz et al. | Mar 2003 | B1 |
6558418 | Carpentier et al. | May 2003 | B2 |
6568387 | Davenport et al. | May 2003 | B2 |
6585639 | Kotmel et al. | Jul 2003 | B1 |
6599311 | Biggs et al. | Jul 2003 | B1 |
6610043 | Ingenito | Aug 2003 | B1 |
6629951 | Laufer et al. | Oct 2003 | B2 |
6632980 | Yadav et al. | Oct 2003 | B1 |
6653525 | Ingenito et al. | Nov 2003 | B2 |
6679264 | Deem et al. | Jan 2004 | B1 |
6692494 | Cooper et al. | Feb 2004 | B1 |
6709401 | Perkins et al. | Mar 2004 | B2 |
6709427 | Nash et al. | Mar 2004 | B1 |
6712812 | Roschak et al. | Mar 2004 | B2 |
6722360 | Doshi | Apr 2004 | B2 |
6726598 | Jarvis et al. | Apr 2004 | B1 |
6743259 | Ginn | Jun 2004 | B2 |
6749606 | Keast et al. | Jun 2004 | B2 |
6787141 | Melvin et al. | Sep 2004 | B1 |
6878141 | Perkins et al. | Apr 2005 | B1 |
6886558 | Tanaka | May 2005 | B2 |
6997189 | Biggs et al. | Feb 2006 | B2 |
7011094 | Rapacki et al. | Mar 2006 | B2 |
7022088 | Keast et al. | Apr 2006 | B2 |
7086398 | Tanaka | Aug 2006 | B2 |
7100616 | Springmeyer | Sep 2006 | B2 |
7175644 | Cooper et al. | Feb 2007 | B2 |
7186259 | Perkins et al. | Mar 2007 | B2 |
7252086 | Tanaka | Aug 2007 | B2 |
7412977 | Fields et al. | Aug 2008 | B2 |
7588033 | Wondka | Sep 2009 | B2 |
7670373 | Sabanathan | Mar 2010 | B1 |
20010016704 | Zadno-Azizi et al. | Aug 2001 | A1 |
20010025132 | Alferness et al. | Sep 2001 | A1 |
20010041906 | Gonzalez | Nov 2001 | A1 |
20010051799 | Ingenito | Dec 2001 | A1 |
20010052344 | Doshi | Dec 2001 | A1 |
20010056274 | Perkins et al. | Dec 2001 | A1 |
20020007831 | Davenport et al. | Jan 2002 | A1 |
20020026233 | Shaknovich | Feb 2002 | A1 |
20020049370 | Laufer et al. | Apr 2002 | A1 |
20020062120 | Perkins et al. | May 2002 | A1 |
20020077593 | Perkins et al. | Jun 2002 | A1 |
20020077696 | Zadno-Azizi et al. | Jun 2002 | A1 |
20020087153 | Roschak et al. | Jul 2002 | A1 |
20020095209 | Zadno-Azizi et al. | Jul 2002 | A1 |
20020111619 | Keast et al. | Aug 2002 | A1 |
20020111620 | Cooper et al. | Aug 2002 | A1 |
20020112729 | DeVore et al. | Aug 2002 | A1 |
20020138135 | Duerig et al. | Sep 2002 | A1 |
20020147462 | Mair et al. | Oct 2002 | A1 |
20030018327 | Truckai et al. | Jan 2003 | A1 |
20030018344 | Kaji et al. | Jan 2003 | A1 |
20030050648 | Alferness et al. | Mar 2003 | A1 |
20030051733 | Kotmel et al. | Mar 2003 | A1 |
20030083671 | Rimbaugh et al. | May 2003 | A1 |
20030164168 | Shaw | Sep 2003 | A1 |
20030181922 | Alferness | Sep 2003 | A1 |
20030183235 | Rimbaugh et al. | Oct 2003 | A1 |
20030195385 | DeVore | Oct 2003 | A1 |
20030228344 | Fields et al. | Dec 2003 | A1 |
20040073155 | Laufer et al. | Apr 2004 | A1 |
20040073201 | Cooper et al. | Apr 2004 | A1 |
20040093075 | Kuehne | May 2004 | A1 |
20040158228 | Perkins et al. | Aug 2004 | A1 |
20040220556 | Cooper et al. | Nov 2004 | A1 |
20040244802 | Tanaka | Dec 2004 | A1 |
20050196344 | McCutcheon et al. | Sep 2005 | A1 |
20060200076 | Gonzalez et al. | Sep 2006 | A1 |
20060264772 | Aljuri et al. | Nov 2006 | A1 |
20070186932 | Wondka et al. | Aug 2007 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
92057497.7 | Jun 1992 | DE |
0 692 273 | Jan 1996 | EP |
0 621 015 | Mar 1998 | EP |
1 078 601 | Feb 2001 | EP |
1 151 729 | Nov 2001 | EP |
2324729 | Nov 1998 | GB |
2140211 | Oct 1999 | RU |
852321 | Jul 1981 | SU |
1371700 | Feb 1988 | SU |
1593651 | Sep 1990 | SU |
WO 9426175 | Nov 1994 | WO |
WO 9533506 | Dec 1995 | WO |
WO 9744085 | Nov 1997 | WO |
WO 9800840 | Jan 1998 | WO |
WO 9839047 | Sep 1998 | WO |
WO 9844854 | Oct 1998 | WO |
WO 9942059 | Aug 1999 | WO |
WO 9964109 | Dec 1999 | WO |
WO 0015149 | Mar 2000 | WO |
WO 0062699 | Oct 2000 | WO |
WO 0110314 | Feb 2001 | WO |
WO 0112104 | Feb 2001 | WO |
WO 0145590 | Jun 2001 | WO |
WO 0154585 | Aug 2001 | WO |
WO 0154625 | Aug 2001 | WO |
WO 0154685 | Aug 2001 | WO |
WO 0174271 | Oct 2001 | WO |
WO 0232333 | Apr 2002 | WO |
WO 02064045 | Aug 2002 | WO |
WO 02064190 | Aug 2002 | WO |
WO 02069823 | Sep 2002 | WO |
WO 03079944 | Oct 2003 | WO |
WO 03088820 | Oct 2003 | WO |
WO 2006078451 | Jul 2006 | WO |
Entry |
---|
Al Jishi et al., “Selective Bronchial Occlusion for Treatment of Bullous Interstitial Emphysema and Bronchopleural Fistula.” J Pediatric Surgery, 1994; 29:1545-1547. |
Autocath.RTM. 100—Nonsurgical, Intraurethral Bladder Control Device for Incontinent and Retentive Women—Dr. Kulisz's Development, retrieved from the Internet: <http://www.kulisz.com/autocath.htm> on Oct. 22, 2009. |
Becker et al., “Lung Volumes Before and After Lung Volume Reduction Surgery,” Am J Respir Crit Care Med, May 1998;157(5 Pt 1):1593-9. |
Burger et al., “Gas exchange in the parabronchial lung of birds: Experiments in unidirectionally ventilated ducks,” Respiration Physiology Mar. 1979; 36(1):19-37. |
Cohn et al., Novel reverse thernnoresponsiye injectable poly(ether carbonates)s, J Mater Sci Mater Med. Feb. 2003;14(2):175-80. |
Cotran et al., Chaper 15 in Robbins Pathologic Basis of Disease, 5th edition, eds., W.B. Saunders Company, Philadelphia, 1974 p. 683-694. |
Criner et al., “Effect of Lung Volume Reduction Surgery on Diaphragm Strength,” Am J Respir Crit Care Med, May 1998;157(5 Pt 1):1578-85. |
Gonzalez et al., [Abstract] “Should patients undergoing a bronchoscopy be sedated?” Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. Apr. 2003;47(4):411-5. |
Harada et al., “Re-expansion of Refractory Atelectasis Using a Bronchofiberscope with a Balloon Cuff,” Chest. Dec. 1983;84(6):725-8. |
Harris et al., “The Experimental Production in Dogs of Emphysema with Associated Asthmatic Syndrome by Means of an Intratracheal Ball Valve,” J. Lab. Clini. Med., 1919; 9(iv):75-88. |
Institute for Clinical Evaluative Sciences (ICES), “Endotracheal tube choice,” 2001; retrieved from the Internet: <http://www.ices.on.ca/informed/periodical/subissue/133-ip7422.pdf>. |
Kotloff et al., “Comparison of Short-term Functional Outcomes Following Unilateral and Bilateral Lung Volume Reduction Surgery,” Chest. Apr. 1998;113(4):890-5. |
Lewis et al., “Pulmonary Interstitial Emphysema: Selective Broncial Occlusion with a Swan—Ganz Catheter”, Archives of Disease in Childhood, 1988; 63:313-315. |
Mathew et al., “Selective bronchial obstruction for treatment of bullous interstitial emphysema.” J. of Ped., 1980; 96:475-477. |
Morrell et al., “Collateral ventilation and gas exchange during airway occlusion in the normal human lung,” Am Rev Respir Dis. Mar. 1993;147(3):535-539. |
Ojo et al., “Lung Volume Reduction Surgery Alters Management of Pulmonary Nodules in Patients With Severe COPD,” Chest. Dec. 1997;112(6):1494-500. |
Okada et al., “Emergent Bronchofiberoptic Bronchial Occlusion for Intractable Pneumothorax with Severe Emphysema”, Jpn J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. Nov. 1998;46(11):1078-81. |
Puhakka et al., “Acute Bronchial Obstruction: An Experimental Rabbit Model Study”, Int. J. of Pediatric Otorhinolaryngology, 1989; 18:107-118. |
Raasch et al., “Radiographic Anatomy of the Interlobar Fissure: A Study of r100 Specimens,” AJR 1982; 138:1043-1049. |
Sclafani, “Clearing the Airways,” AARC Times, Jan. 1999, pp. 69-72. |
Snider et al., “The Definition of Emphysema: Report of the National Heart Lung and Blood Institute, Division of Lung Diseases Workshop,” Am. Rev. Respir. Dis. 1985; 132:182-185. |
Woodring et al., “Pneumothorax ex Vacuo”, Chest, 1996; 100:1102-1105. |
Woolcock et al., “Mechanical Factors Influencing Collateral Ventilation in Human, Dog, and Pig Lungs,” J. Appl Physiol. Jan. 1971;30(1):99-115. |
Office action dated Jan. 14, 2010 for U.S. Appl. No. 11/620,016. |
Office action dated Jul. 2, 2010 for U.S. Appl. No. 11/620,016. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20110220104 A1 | Sep 2011 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
60756732 | Jan 2006 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 11620016 | Jan 2007 | US |
Child | 12883039 | US | |
Parent | 11067025 | Feb 2005 | US |
Child | 11620016 | US |