The disclosure relates generally to electrostatic precipitator (ESP) cleaning, and more particularly, to a system and method for cleaning collecting plates of an ESP by applying a resonant frequency wave.
Electrostatic precipitators (ESP), or electrostatic air cleaners, are particulate collection machines that pull particles from a moving gas such as air using an electrostatic charge on or commingled with the particles causing them to move perpendicular to gas flow and come to rest on the collecting plates. In industrial settings, cleaning of ESP collecting plates is accomplished using mechanical force, applied by hitting or rapping the collecting plates using a drop rod or tumbling hammer, which dislodges particles from the collecting plate to a hopper. Specific to electromagnetic rappers, the operator varies the lift height of the plunger, the number of times the plunger strikes and how frequently the rapper strikes. However, there is limited effort to vary the force based on debris load or position within the fields. It is common to vary the lift height of an electromagnetic rapper based on its location within the electrostatic precipitator. However, the tumbling hammer systems can only vary the “on” and “off” time of the cycle.
With regard to the force applied, the mechanical force is typically introduced at a periphery of the collecting plate, e.g., the extreme top or bottom of the collecting plate. Consequently, the shock wave caused by that force dissipates as it travels through the collecting plate. To effectively clean the periphery of the collecting plate, it is necessary to impart excessive force to the components nearest the point of initial impact. The excessive force creates a number of problems such as fatigue failures or misalignment, and collected particle re-entrainment into the gas stream. Most attempts at improving the effectiveness of this cleaning approach relate to decreasing the number of collecting plates cleaned by a single hammer device. In this manner, the disparity between the force at the point of introduction to the periphery on the plate is reduced. However, the change increases the cost of the ESP and increases the number of housing openings required for the ESP.
Industrial ESPs use a number of stages or fields in an ESP to remove particles. However, over 85% of the particles are collected in the inlet field collecting plate(s). As a result, the particle layer on these collecting plates will build up quicker compared to subsequent fields. More particularly, at the inlet of the first field, the particles are typically evenly distributed in the vertical plane. As one progresses through the ESP, however, the particles tend to migrate downward increasing the particle density towards the bottom of the collecting plates. This condition results in a relatively even particle thickness from top to bottom at the inlet field collecting plates and a skewed thickness toward the bottom in the outlet field collecting plates. Current cleaning approaches do not address this anomaly.
Acoustic horns have been applied to remove particles from collecting plates.
A first aspect of the disclosure provides a system comprising: a resonant frequency modeler for determining a resonant frequency of a node on a collecting plate that collects particles from a gas flow; and a wave generating device that applies a wave having an applied frequency substantially equal to the resonant frequency to the node of the collecting plate to remove particles from the collecting plate.
A second aspect of the disclosure provides an electrostatic precipitator (ESP) comprising: a plurality of substantially parallel collecting plates for positioning in a gas flow; an electrostatic generator for generating an electrostatic charge on or around particles in the gas flow causing them to migrate to at least one of the collecting plates; a cleaning system for the at least one collecting plate, the cleaning system including: a resonant frequency modeler for determining a resonant frequency of a node on the at least one collecting plate; and a wave generating device that applies a wave having an applied frequency substantially equal to the resonant frequency to the node of the at least one collecting plate to remove particles from the collecting plate.
A third aspect of the disclosure provides a method comprising: modeling a resonant frequency of a node on a collecting plate that collects particles from a gas flow; and generating an acoustic wave having an applied frequency that is substantially equal to the modeled resonant frequency for application to the node of the collecting plate to remove particles from the collecting plate.
The illustrative aspects of the present disclosure are designed to solve the problems herein described and/or other problems not discussed.
These and other features of this disclosure will be more readily understood from the following detailed description of the various aspects of the disclosure taken in conjunction with the accompanying drawings that depict various embodiments of the disclosure, in which:
It is noted that the drawings of the disclosure are not to scale. The drawings are intended to depict only typical aspects of the disclosure, and therefore should not be considered as limiting the scope of the disclosure. In the drawings, like numbering represents like elements between the drawings.
Referring to the drawings,
As is understood, as particles collect on collecting plates 104A-F, the efficacy of the particle collection diminishes, requiring cleaning of the collecting plates. In accordance with embodiments of the invention, system 102 is provided for cleaning at least one collecting plate 104A-F. System 100 includes a resonant frequency modeler 120 for determining a resonant frequency of a node 122 (
In any event, resonant frequency modeler 120 (
Returning to
Wave generating device 130 may include any now known or later developed device for generating a wave having the requisite resonant frequency to a respective node(s) 122, but does not physically rap, hit or contact the collecting plate. That is, the wave has an applied frequency substantially equal to the resonant frequency. In one embodiment, wave generating device 130 includes one applicator 132 (shown for collecting plate 104A) for a respective collecting plate.
In one embodiment, wave generating device 130, i.e., an applicator 132, may include one or more powered diaphragms 134 (only one labeled as such in
Although illustrated as within gas flow 106, wave generating device 130 (i.e., applicators 132) may be positioned outside of gas flow 106, so as not to impede the gas flow.
In addition to the above-described structure, system 102 may also include a mechanical force applying device 150 for physically rapping, hitting or contacting a collecting plate. Mechanical force applying device 150 may include any now known or later developed system for rapping or hammering a collecting plate 104A-F. In one embodiment, mechanical force applying device 150 is positioned at lower region 136 of a collecting plate, where physical application of force is advantageous to remove very heavy particle collection.
In operation, resonant frequency modeler 120 models resonant frequency of a node(s) 122 on a collecting plate(s) 104A-F. Based on the model generated, wave generating device 130 applies a wave having an applied frequency substantially equal to the resonant frequency to one or more nodes 122 of one or more collecting plates 104A-F to remove particles from the collecting plate. Where multiple applicators 132 are implemented, wave generating device 130 may apply a different frequency to at least two nodes, e.g., within a single collecting plate 104A-F and/or across different collecting plates 104A-F. Furthermore, wave generating device 130 may change the applied frequency depending on an amount of particles at one or more node(s) 122 on the collecting plate(s) 104A-F, e.g., based on a duration of operation or a model's indication.
An advantage that may be realized in the practice of some embodiments of described systems and technique is that the use of resonant frequency harmonics in a collecting plate 104A-F causes particles to cascade to hopper 140 using the least amplitude, minimizing re-entrainment of collected particles and improving gas cleanliness compliance. System 102 may also assist in reducing emissions and increasing fuel flexibility for certain applications. In addition, the life of internal components may be increased by eliminating fatigue. System 102 is also expected to be less expensive than conventional systems, and reduce the number of openings into a housing used for ESP 100.
The terminology used herein is for the purpose of describing particular embodiments only and is not intended to be limiting of the disclosure. As used herein, the singular forms “a”, “an” and “the” are intended to include the plural forms as well, unless the context clearly indicates otherwise. It will be further understood that the terms “comprises” and/or “comprising,” when used in this specification, specify the presence of stated features, integers, steps, operations, elements, and/or components, but do not preclude the presence or addition of one or more other features, integers, steps, operations, elements, components, and/or groups thereof.
The corresponding structures, materials, acts, and equivalents of all means or step plus function elements in the claims below are intended to include any structure, material, or act for performing the function in combination with other claimed elements as specifically claimed. The description of the present disclosure has been presented for purposes of illustration and description, but is not intended to be exhaustive or limited to the disclosure in the form disclosed. Many modifications and variations will be apparent to those of ordinary skill in the art without departing from the scope and spirit of the disclosure. The embodiment was chosen and described in order to best explain the principles of the disclosure and the practical application, and to enable others of ordinary skill in the art to understand the disclosure for various embodiments with various modifications as are suited to the particular use contemplated.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
3504480 | Copcutt et al. | Apr 1970 | A |
3631792 | Bodine | Jan 1972 | A |
3771286 | Scott | Nov 1973 | A |
3892544 | Haupt | Jul 1975 | A |
4032307 | Sommerfeld | Jun 1977 | A |
4036610 | Huppi | Jul 1977 | A |
4221573 | Hankins | Sep 1980 | A |
4255775 | Andrews | Mar 1981 | A |
4285024 | Andrews | Aug 1981 | A |
4413225 | Donig et al. | Nov 1983 | A |
5900043 | Grandjean et al. | May 1999 | A |
6171366 | Vicard et al. | Jan 2001 | B1 |
6221258 | Feke et al. | Apr 2001 | B1 |
7413593 | Altman et al. | Aug 2008 | B2 |
20090282641 | Black et al. | Nov 2009 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
551162 | Jul 1993 | EP |
2125314 | Mar 1984 | GB |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20110146486 A1 | Jun 2011 | US |